Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:01:28.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Embryo quality (classification and selection)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2016

By
Alberto Tejera ,
Natalia Basile ,
Mauro Caiazzo  and
Marcos Meseguer
Edited by
Marcos Meseguer
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Time-Lapse Microscopy in In-Vitro Fertilization , pp. 104 - 127
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Guerin, P, El Mouatassim, S, Menezo, Y. Oxidative stress and protection against reactive oxygen species in the pre-implantation embryo and its surroundings. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:175–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittemer, C, Ohl, J, Bailly, M, Bettahar-Lebugle, K, Nisand, I. Does body mass index of infertile women have an impact on IVF procedure and outcome? J Assist Reprod Genet 2000;17:547–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Dechaud, H, Anahory, T, Reyftmann, L, Loup, V, Hamamah, S, Hedon, B. Obesity does not adversely affect results in patients who are undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;127:88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, RG, Fishel, SB, Cohen, J, Fehilly, CB, Purdy, JM, Slater, JM, et al. Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1984;1:3–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, TK, Slama, R, Ducot, B, Suominen, J, Cawood, EH, Andersen, AG, et al. Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy among fertile couples from four European cities. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2697–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamiz, P, Rubio, C, de los Santos, MJ, Mercader, A, Simon, C, Remohi, J, et al. The effect of pronuclear morphology on early development and chromosomal abnormalities in cleavage-stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2413–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metwally, M, Cutting, R, Tipton, A, Skull, J, Ledger, WL, Li, TC. Effect of increased body mass index on oocyte and embryo quality in IVF patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;15:532–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alikani, M, Palermo, G, Adler, A, Bertoli, M, Blake, M, Cohen, J. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in dysmorphic human oocytes. Zygote 1995;3:283–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krizanovska, K, Ulcova-Gallova, Z, Bouse, V, Rokyta, Z. Obesity and reproductive disorders. Sb Lek 2002;103:517–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Lintsen, AM, Pasker-de Jong, PC, de Boer, EJ, Burger, CW, Jansen, CA, Braat, DD, et al. Effects of subfertility cause, smoking and body weight on the success rate of IVF. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1867–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metwally, M, Ong, KJ, Ledger, WL, Li, TC. Does high body mass index increase the risk of miscarriage after spontaneous and assisted conception? A meta-analysis of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2008;90:714–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, KR, Andersen, ML, Schantz, AL. Obesity and pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:1022–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, JX, Davies, MJ, Norman, RJ. Obesity increases the risk of spontaneous abortion during infertility treatment. Obes Res 2002;10:551–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, L. The biological basis of non-invasive strategies for selection of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update 2003;9:237–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, RH, Wilcox, AJ, Skjaerven, R, Baird, DD. Men’s body mass index and infertility. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2488–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metwally, M, Tuckerman, EM, Laird, SM, Ledger, WL, Li, TC. Impact of high body mass index on endometrial morphology and function in the peri-implantation period in women with recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14:328–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veeck, LL. Oocyte assessment and biological performance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988;541:259–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goyanes, VJ, Ron-Corzo, A, Costas, E, Maneiro, E. Morphometric categorization of the human oocyte and early conceptus. Hum Reprod 1990;5:613–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabrielsen, A, Lindenberg, S, Petersen, K. The impact of the zona pellucida thickness variation of human embryos on pregnancy outcome in relation to suboptimal embryo development. A prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2166–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, NN, Goldstein, J, Rowland, DY, Goldfarb, JM. Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2190–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tao, J, Tamis, R, Fink, K, Williams, B, Nelson-White, T, Craig, R. The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1513–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balaban, B, Urman, B, Sertac, A, Alatas, C, Aksoy, S, Mercan, R. Blastocyst quality affects the success of blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;74:282–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK, Lane, M, Stevens, J, Schlenker, T, Schoolcraft, WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1155–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoolcraft, WB, Gardner, DK. Blastocyst culture and transfer increases the efficiency of oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 2000;74:482–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Racowsky, C, Combelles, CM, Nureddin, A, Pan, Y, Finn, A, Miles, L, et al. Day 3 and day 5 morphological predictors of embryo viability. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;6:323–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, KS, Harris, DC, Daneshmand, ST, Shapiro, BS. Quantitative grading of a human blastocyst: optimal inner cell mass size and shape. Fertil Steril 2001;76:1157–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoukir, Y, Campana, A, Farley, T, Sakkas, D. Early cleavage of in-vitro fertilized human embryos to the 2-cell stage: a novel indicator of embryo quality and viability. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1531–6.Google Scholar
Kovacic, B, Vlaisavljevic, V, Reljic, M, Cizek-Sajko, M. Developmental capacity of different morphological types of day 5 human morulae and blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;8:687–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montag, M, Liebenthron, J, Koster, M. Which morphological scoring system is relevant in human embryo development? Placenta 2011;32 Suppl 3:S252–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciray, HN, Campbell, A, Agerholm, IE, Aguilar, J, Chamayou, S, Esbert, M, et al. Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group. Hum Reprod 2014;29:2650–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemmen, JG, Agerholm, I, Ziebe, S. Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:385–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, CC, Loewke, KE, Bossert, NL, Behr, B, De Jonge, CJ, Baer, TM, et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:1115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzarello, A, Hoest, T, Mikkelsen, AL. The impact of pronuclei morphology and dynamicity on live birth outcome after time-lapse culture. Hum Reprod 2012;27:2649–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamayou, S, Patrizio, P, Storaci, G, Tomaselli, V, Alecci, C, Ragolia, C, et al. The use of morphokinetic parameters to select all embryos with full capacity to implant. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:703–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkegaard, K, Kesmodel, US, Hindkjaer, JJ, Ingerslev, HJ. Time-lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2643–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aguilar, J, Motato, Y, Escriba, MJ, Ojeda, M, Munoz, E, Meseguer, M. The human first cell cycle: impact on implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;28:475–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meseguer, M, Herrero, J, Tejera, A, Hilligsoe, KM, Ramsing, N, Remohi, J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 2011:1–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Basile, N, Vime, P, Florensa, M, Aparicio Ruiz, B, Garcia Velasco, JA, Remohi, J, et al. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection. Hum Reprod 2015;30(2): 276–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dal Canto, M, Coticchio, G, Mignini Renzini, M, De Ponti, E, Novara, PV, Brambillasca, F, et al. Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:474–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freour, T, Dessolle, L, Lammers, J, Lattes, S, Barriere, P. Comparison of embryo morphokinetics after in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in smoking and nonsmoking women. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1944–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A, Fishel, S, Bowman, N, Duffy, S, Sedler, M, Hickman, CF. Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;26:477–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz, M, Garrido, N, Herrero, J, Perez-Cano, I, Munoz, M, Meseguer, M. Timing of cell division in human cleavage-stage embryos is linked with blastocyst formation and quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:371–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubio, I, Kuhlmann, R, Agerholm, I, Kirk, J, Herrero, J, Escriba, MJ, et al. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril 2012 ; 98(6):1458–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hlinka, D, Kalatova, B, Uhrinova, I, Dolinska, S, Rutarova, J, Rezacova, J, et al. Time-lapse cleavage rating predicts human embryo viability. Physiol Res 2012;61:513–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Basile, N, Nogales Mdel, C, Bronet, F, Florensa, M, Riqueiros, M, Rodrigo, L, et al. Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis. Fertil Steril 2014;101:699–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chavez, SL, Loewke, KE, Han, J, Moussavi, F, Colls, P, Munne, S, et al. Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage. Nat Commun 2012;3:1251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubio, I, Galan, A, Larreategui, Z, Ayerdi, F, Bellver, J, Herrero, J, et al. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertil Steril 2014; 102(5):1287–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conaghan, J, Chen, AA, Willman, SP, Ivani, K, Chenette, PE, Boostanfar, R, et al. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Fertil Steril 2013;100:412,9.e5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A, Fishel, S, Bowman, N, Duffy, S, Sedler, M, Thornton, S. Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27(2):140–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×