Book contents
- Systems, Relations, and the Structures of International Societies
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
- Systems, Relations, and the Structures of International Societies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Systems, Relations, Levels, and Explanations
- Part II Waltzian Structural Theory
- Part III Systems, Relations, and Processes
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2023
Book contents
- Systems, Relations, and the Structures of International Societies
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
- Systems, Relations, and the Structures of International Societies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Systems, Relations, Levels, and Explanations
- Part II Waltzian Structural Theory
- Part III Systems, Relations, and Processes
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Aall, Pamela, Crocker, Chester A., and Hampson, Fen Osler. 2020. “A New Concert? Diplomacy for a Chaotic World.” Survival 62 (6):77–94.Google Scholar
Abatecola, Gianpaolo, Breslin, Dermot, and Kask, Johan. 2020. “Do Organizations Really Co-evolve? Problematizing Co-evolutionary Change in Management and Organization Studies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 155:119964.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1988. “Transcending General Linear Reality.” Sociological Theory 6 (2):169–186.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., Green, Jessica F., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2016. “Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance.” International Organization 70 (2):247–277.Google Scholar
Abell, Peter. 2011. “Singular Mechanisms and Bayesian Narratives.” In Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, edited by Demeulenaere, Pierre. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abouheif, Ehab et al. 2014. “Eco-Evo-Devo: The Time Has Come.” In Ecological Genomics: Ecology and the Evolution of Genes and Genomes, edited by Landry, Christian R. and Aubin-Hearth, Nadia. Springer.Google Scholar
Abrahamsen, Adele, Sheredos, Benjamin, and Bechtel, William. 2017. “Explaining Visually Using Mechanism Diagrams.” In The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, edited by Glennan, Stuart and Illari, Phyllis. Routledge.Google Scholar
Abrahamsen, Rita and Williams, Michael C.. 2009. “Security beyond the State: Global Security Assemblages in International Politics.” International Political Sociology 3 (1):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2014. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. 3rd ed. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acuto, Michele and Curtis, Simon, eds. 2014. Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acuto, Michele and Leffel, Benjamin. 2021. “Understanding the Global Ecosystem of City Networks.” Urban Studies 58 (9):1758–1774.Google Scholar
Adams, Julia. 2005. The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Simon. 1990. “Tactics or Politics? ‘The Military Revolution’ and the Hapsburg Hegemony, 1525–1648.” In Tools of War: Instruments, Ideas, and Institutions of Warfare, 1445–1871, edited by Lynn, John A.. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2008. “The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (2):195–195.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2019. World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael N., eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Greve, Patricia. 2009. “When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance.” Review of International Studies 35 (S1):59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, eds. 2011. International Practices. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2011. “Inter- and Transnational Field(s) of Power: On a Field Trip with Bourdieu.” International Political Sociology 5 (3):327–331.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2015. “Conclusion: Relationalism or Why Diplomats Find International Relations Theory Strange.” In Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics, edited by Sending, Ole Jacob, Pouliot, Vincent, and Neumann, Iver B.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Pouliot, Vincent. 2014. “Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (4):889–911.Google Scholar
Aggestam, Lisbeth and Johansson, Markus. 2017. “The Leadership Paradox in EU Foreign Policy.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (6):1203–1220.Google Scholar
Agnew, John A., Mitchell, Katharyne, and Tuathail, Gearóid Ó, eds. 2003. A Companion to Political Geography. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Agrawal, Anurag A. and Zhang, Xuening. 2021. “The Evolution of Coevolution in the Study of Species Interactions.” Evolution 75 (7):1594–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Otaibi, Saleh Zaid. 2020. “The Impact of Arab Revolution on the Security of the Arabian Gulf: The Yemeni Revolution as a Model.” Review of Economics and Political Science 5 (2):136–148.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias and Bathon, Felix Maximilian. 2020. “Quantum and Systems Theory in World Society: Not Brothers and Sisters but Relatives Still?” Security Dialogue 51 (5):434–449.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias and Buzan, Barry. 2013. “International Relations Theory and the “Social Whole”: Encounters and Gaps between IR and Sociology.” International Political Sociology 7 (2):117–135.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zurn, Michael. 2013. “Introduction: Differentiation Theory and International Relations.” In Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, edited by Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zurn, Michael. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. 1996. Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Colin and Neal, Jacob. 2020. “Teleological Notions in Biology.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/teleology-biology/.Google Scholar
Allen, T. F. H. and Starr, T. B.. 2017. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. and Powell, G. Bingham. 1978. Comparative Politics: System, Process, and Policy. Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Almudi, Isabel and Fatas-Villafranca, Francisco. 2021. Coevolution in Economic Systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altman, Dan. 2020. “The Evolution of Territorial Conquest after 1945 and the Limits of the Territorial Integrity Norm.” International Organization 74 (3):490–522.Google Scholar
Ames, Christine Caldwell. 2015. Medieval Heresies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amstutz, Mark R. 2013. International Ethics: Concepts, Theories, and Cases in Global Politics. 4th ed. Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Andersen, Jakob L. et al. 2021. “Defining Autocatalysis in Chemical Reaction Networks.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03086.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. S. 1998 [1988]. War and Society in Europe of the Old Regime 1618–1789. McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Andreas, Holger and Guenther, Mario. 2021. “Regularity and Inferential Theories of Causation.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/causation-regularity/.Google Scholar
Angell, Norman. 1910. The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage. G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Angell, Norman. 1914. Arms and Industry: A Study of the Foundations of International Polity. G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Angell, Norman. 1921. The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to “The Great Illusion”. The Century Company.Google Scholar
Angstrom, Jan. 2000. “The Sociology of Studies of Ethnic Conflict: Explaining the Causal Status of Development.” Civil Wars 3 (3):23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anjum, Rani Lill and Mumford, Stephen. 2017. “Emergence and Demergence.” In Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation, edited by Paolini Paoletti, Michele and Orilla, Francesco. Routledge.Google Scholar
Anjum, Rani Lill and Mumford, Stephen. 2018a. Causation in Science and the Methods of Scientific Discovery. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anjum, Rani Lill and Mumford, Stephen. 2018b. “Dispositionalism: A Dynamic Theory of Causation.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ankersen, Christopher. 2021. “A Kaleidoscopic Future: The State and Assemblages in Global Affairs.” In The Future of Global Affairs: Managing Discontinuity, Disruption and Destruction, edited by Ankersen, Christopher and Sidhu, Waheguru Pal Singh. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Arcand, Bernard. 1999. “The Cuiva.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1982. “Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action.” British Journal of Sociology 33 (4):455–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 2000. “For Structure: Its Reality, Properties and Powers. A Reply to Anthony King.” Sociological Review 48 (3):464–472.Google Scholar
Ariew, André. 2007. “Teleology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Hull, David L. and Ruse, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ariew, André, Cummins, Robert, and Perlman, Mark, eds. 2002. Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. 2000. The Ideological Origins of the British Empire. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnellos, Argyris. 2018. “From Organizations of Processes to Organisms and Other Biological Individuals.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Benjamin. 1991. Princes and Territories in Medieval Germany. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 2003 [1966]. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Art, Robert J. and Jervis, Robert, eds. 1973. International Politics: Anarchy, Force, Imperialism. Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Asch, Ronald G. 2014. Sacral Kingship between Disenchantment and Re-Enchantment: The French and English Monarchies, 1587–1688. Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Asch, Ronald G. 2015. “Monarchy in Western and Central Europe.” In The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern European History. Volume II: Cultures and Power, edited by Scott, Hamish. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism.” International Organization 38 (2):225–286.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. 1988. “Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique.” Millennium 17 (2):227–262.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Lucian M. 2017. “David Mitrany on The International Anarchy: A Lost Work of Classical Realism?” Journal of International Political Theory 13 (3):311–324.Google Scholar
Austin, Christopher J. 2020. “Organisms, Activity, and Being: On the Substance of Process Ontology.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (2):1–21.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K., eds. 2010. Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah and Westerwinter, Oliver, eds. 2016. The New Power Politics: Networks and Transnational Security Governance. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1981. “The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists.” American Political Science Review 75 (2):306–318.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert and Keohane, Robert O.. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38 (1):226–254.Google Scholar
Ayala, Francisco J. 1970. “Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary Biology.” Philosophy of Science 37 (1):1–15.Google Scholar
Aylmer, G. E. 1980. “From Office-Holding to Civil Service: The Genesis of Modern Bureaucracy. The Prothero Lecture.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 30:91–108.Google Scholar
Bachmann, Jan, Bell, Colleen, and Holmqvist, Caroline, eds. 2015. War, Police and Assemblages of Intervention. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bachmann, Pascale Angelica, Luigi Luisi, Pier, and Lang, Jacques. 1992. “Autocatalytic Self-Replicating Micelles as Models for Prebiotic Structures.” Nature 357 (6373):57–59.Google Scholar
Baedke, Jan. 2018. Above the Gene, beyond Biology: Toward a Philosophy of Epigenetics. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Baedke, Jan and Gilbert, Scott F.. 2020. “Evolution and Development.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/evolution-development/.Google Scholar
Bailer-Jones, Daniela M. 2009. Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Kenneth D. 1983. “Relationships among Conceptual, Abstracted, and Concrete Systems.” Behavioral Science 28 (3):219–232.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. H. 1938. International Studies in Modern Education. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bain, William. 2019. “International Anarchy and Political Theology: Rethinking the Legacy of Thomas Hobbes.” Journal of International Relations and Development 22 (2):278–299.Google Scholar
Baird, Julia et al. 2019. “Emergence of Collaborative Environmental Governance: What Are the Causal Mechanisms?” Environmental Management 63 (1):16–31.Google Scholar
Baldanza, Kathlene. 2016. Ming China and Vietnam: Negotiating Borders in Early Modern Asia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balzacq, Thierry. 2011. “A Theory of Secutitization: Origins, Core Assumptions, Variations.” In Understanding Securitisation Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by Balzacq, Thierry. Routledge.Google Scholar
Balzacq, Thierry. 2019. “Securitization Theory: Past, Present, and Future.” Polity 51 (2):331–348.Google Scholar
Bang, Peter Fibiger and Bayly, C. A., eds. 2011. Tributary Empires in Global History. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Banks, Michael. 1969. “Systems Analysis and the Study of Regions.” International Studies Quarterly 13 (4):335–360.Google Scholar
Bapteste, Eric and Anderson, Gemma. 2018. “Intersecting Processes Are Necessary Explanantia for Evolutionary Biology, but Challenge Retrodiction.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bapteste, Eric and Dupré, John. 2013. “Towards a Processual Microbial Ontology.” Biology & Philosophy 28 (2):379–404.Google Scholar
Bardini, R. et al. 2017. “Multi-Level and Hybrid Modelling Approaches for Systems Biology.” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 15:396–402.Google Scholar
Barkdull, John. 1995. “Waltz, Durkheim, and International Relations: The International System as an Abnormal Form.” American Political Science Review 89 (3):669–680.Google Scholar
Barker, Gillian and Odling-Smee, John. 2014. “Integrating Ecology and Evolution: Niche Construction and Ecological Engineering.” In Entangled Life: Organism and Environment in the Biological and Social Sciences, edited by Barker, Gillian, Desjardins, Eric, and Pearce, Trevor. Springer.Google Scholar
Barman, Emily. 2016. “Varieties of Field Theory and the Sociology of the Non-Profit Sector.” Sociology Compass 10 (6):442–458.Google Scholar
Barnard, Alan. 1992. Hunters and Herders of Southern Africa: A Comparative Ethnography of the Khoisan Peoples. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnard, Alan. 2002. “The Foraging Mode of Thought.” In Self- and Other-Images of Hunter-Gatherers, edited by Stewart, Henry, Barnard, Alan, and Omura, Keiichi. National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Barnes, Harry Elmer. 1930. World Politics and Modern Civilization: The Contributions of Nationalism, Capitalism, Imperialism and Militarism to Human Culture and International Anarchy. A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 1993. “Institutions, Roles, and Disorder: The Case of the Arab States System.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (3):271–296.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 1998. Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2017. “Hierarchy and Paternalism.” In Hierarchies in World Politics, edited by Zarakol, Ayse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond, eds. 2005. Power in Global Governance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2008. “From International Relations to Global Society.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Joshua. 2013. Great Power Peace and American Primacy: The Origins and Future of a New International Order. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barresi, Michael J. F. and Gilbert, Scott F.. 2020. Developmental Biology. 12th (Kindle) ed. Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. 1995b. “The Trial of Judgment: A Note on Kant and the Paradoxes of Internationalism.” International Studies Quarterly 39 (2):255–279.Google Scholar
Bartha, Paul. 2019. “Analogy and Analogical Reasoning.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/reasoning-analogy/.Google Scholar
Barthélemy, Dominique. 2009 [1997]. The Serf, the Knight, and the Historian. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bathelt, Harald and Glückler, Johannes. 2003. “Toward a Relational Economic Geography.” Journal of Economic Geography 3 (2):117–144.Google Scholar
Bathelt, Harald and Li, Peng-Fei. 2014. “Evolutionary Economic Geography and Relational Geography.” In Handbook of Regional Science, edited by Fischer, Manfred M. and Nijkamp, Peter. Springer.Google Scholar
Baumann, Rainer and Dingwerth, Klaus. 2015. “Global Governance vs Empire: Why World Order Moves towards Heterarchy and Hierarchy.” Journal of International Relations and Development 18 (1):104–128.Google Scholar
Baur, Nina and Ernst, Stefanie. 2011. “Towards a Process-Oriented Methodology: Modern Social Science Research Methods and Norbert Elias’s Figurational Sociology.” The Sociological Review 59 (S1):117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Derek. 2013. “Taking Mechanisms Seriously?” European Political Science 12 (1):13–15.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek. 2015. “Liberal International Relations Theory and EU Foreign Policy.” In The SAGE Handbook of European Foreign Policy, edited by Jorgensen, Knud Erik et al. SAGE Publishers.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek. 2020. “Multi-Method Research in the Social Sciences: A Review of Recent Frameworks and a Way Forward.” Government and Opposition 55 (1):163–182.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. 2019. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. 2nd ed. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Kyle et al. 2020. “Hierarchy and the Provision of Order in International Politics.” The Journal of Politics 82 (2):731–746.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L. and Rosenberg, Alexander. 1981. Hume and the Problem of Causation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William. 2011. “Mechanism and Biological Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 78 (4):533–557.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William. 2016. “Mechanists Must be Holists Too! Perspectives from Circadian Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 49 (4):705–731.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William. 2017a. “Diagrammatic Reasoning.” In Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science, edited by Magnani, Lorenzo and Bertolotti, Tomasso. Springer.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William. 2017b. “Explicating Top-Down Causation Using Networks and Dynamics.” Philosophy of Science 84 (2):253–274.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William. 2017c. “Systems Biology: Negotiating between Holism and Reductionism.” In Philosophy of Systems Biology: Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers, edited by Green, Sara. Springer.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William and Abrahamsen, Adele. 2005. “Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36:421–441.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William and Richardson, Robert C.. 1992. “Emergent Phenomena and Complex Systems.” In Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism, edited by Beckermann, Ansgar, Flohr, Hans, and Kim, Jaegwon. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William and Richardson, Robert C.. 2010. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Heike. 2003. “The Least Sexist Society? Perspectives on Gender, Change and Violence among Southern African San.” Journal of Southern African Studies 29 (1):5–23.Google Scholar
Bedau, Mark A. 2002. “Downward Causation and the Autonomy of Weak Emergence.” Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 6 (1):5–50.Google Scholar
Bedau, Mark A. and Humphreys, Paul, eds. 2008. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Begon, Michael and Townsend, Colin R.. 2021. Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems. 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Behnke, Nathalie, Broschek, Jörg, and Sonnicksen, Jared, eds. 2019. Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beik, William, ed. 2000. Louis XIV and Absolutism: A Brief Study with Documents. Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Beik, William. 2005. “The Absolutism of Louis XIV as Social Collaboration.” Past & Present 188:195–224.Google Scholar
Beldade, Patrícia and Monteiro, Antónia. 2021. “Eco-Evo-Devo Advances with Butterfly Eyespots.” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 69:6–13.Google Scholar
Bell, Martin. 2008. “Hume on Causation.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, 2nd ed., edited by Norton, David Fate and Taylor, Jacqueline. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Belmonte, Rosalba and Cerny, Philip G.. 2021. “Heterarchy: Toward Paradigm Shift in World Politics.” Journal of Political Power 14 (1):235–257.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1977 [1960]. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Benedict, Philip. 1992. “French Cities from the Sixteenth Century to the Revolution: An Overview.” In Cities and Social Change in Early Modern France, edited by Benedict, Philip. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, Bo and Ruonavaara, Hannu. 2017. “Comparative Process Tracing: Making Historical Comparison Structured and Focused.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (1):44–66.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. 2010. “Process Tracing and Causal Inference.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed., edited by Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. 2013. “The Mother of All Isms: Causal Mechanisms and Structured Pluralism in International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3):459–481.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T., eds. 2015a. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytical Tool. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2015b. “Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices.” In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytical Tool, edited by Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berenskoetter, Felix. 2011. “Reclaiming the Vision Thing: Constructivists as Students of the Future.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (3):647–668.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M. van den and Stagl, Sigrid. 2003. “Coevolution of Economic Behaviour and Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Change.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13 (3):289–317.Google Scholar
Berling, Trine Villumsen. 2015. The International Political Sociology of Security: Rethinking Theory and Practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernard, Luther Lee and Bernard, Jessie. 1934. Sociology and the Study of International Relations. Washington University.Google Scholar
Bertolaso, Marta. 2017. “A Systems Approach to Cancer: From Things to Relations.” In Philosophy of Systems Biology: Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers, edited by Green, Sara. Springer.Google Scholar
Bertolaso, Marta and Dupré, John. 2018. “A Processual Perspective on Cancer.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Betts, Matthew W., Hardenberg, Mari, and Stirling, Ian. 2015. “How Animals Create Human History: Relational Ecology and the Dorset–Polar Bear Connection.” American Antiquity 80 (1):89–112.Google Scholar
Bickhard, Mark H. 2004. “Process and Emergence: Normative Function and Representation.” Axiomathes 14 (3):121–155.Google Scholar
Bickhard, Mark H. 2011. “Some Consequences (and Enablings) of Process Metaphysics.” Axiomathes 21 (1):3–32.Google Scholar
Biesele, Megan and Royal, Kxao-/o/oo. 1999. “The Ju/’hoansi of Botswana and Namibia.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biggiero, Luccio et al., eds. 2022. The Relational View of Economics: A New Research Agenda for the Study of Relational Transactions. Springer.Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier. 2011. “Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices, Practices of Power.” International Political Sociology 5 (2):225–258.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1980. “Willow Smoke and Dogs Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation.” American Antiquity 45 (1):4–20.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander. 2018. “Thomas Kuhn.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/thomas-kuhn/.Google Scholar
Bird-David, Nurit. 1992. “Beyond ‘The Original Affluent Society’: A Culturalist Reformulation.” Current Anthropology 33 (1):25–34.Google Scholar
Bird-David, Nurit. 1994. “Sociality and Immediacy: Or, Past and Present Conversations on Bands.” Man 29 (3):583–603.Google Scholar
Birmingham, David. 2018. A Concise History of Portugal. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Anthony. 1998. “Popes and Councils.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Jeremy. 1991. A Military Revolution? Military Change and European Society, 1550–1800. Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Black, Jeremy. 2011. Beyond the Military Revolution: War in the Seventeenth Century World. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blackmore, H. 2021. “The Seven Themes of Heterarchy: Reviewing a 75-Year-Old Concept and Suggestions for Further Development.” Cybernetics and Human Knowing 28 (1–2):11–29.Google Scholar
Blagden, David. 2021. “Uneven and Combined Development: Convergence Realism in Communist Regalia?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 34 (2):250–266.Google Scholar
Blaney, David L. and Trownsell, Tamara A.. 2021. “Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18 (70):45–62.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Blockmans, Wim. 1978. “A Typology of Representative Institutions in Late Medieval Europe.” Journal of Medieval History 4 (2):189–215.Google Scholar
Blockmans, Wim. 1997. A History of Power in Europe: Peoples, Markets, States. Fonds Mercator.Google Scholar
Blockmans, Wim. 1998. “Representation (Since the Thirteenth Century).” In The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blokhuis, Alex, Lacoste, David, and Nghe, Philippe. 2020. “Universal Motifs and the Diversity of Autocatalytic Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (41):25230–25236.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Uta-Renate. 1988 [1982]. The Investiture Controversy: Church and Monarchy from the Ninth to the Twelfth Century. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Uta-Renate. 2004. “The Papacy, 1024–1122.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 4 c. 1024–c. 1198, Part II, edited by Luscombe, David and Riley-Smith, Jonathan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. 1874. Le droit international codifié. 2nd ed. Librairie de Guillaumin et cie.Google Scholar
Boehm, Christopher. 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boggs, Jeffrey S. and Rantisi, Norma M.. 2003. “The ‘Relational Turn’ in Economic Geography.” Journal of Economic Geography 3:109–116.Google Scholar
Bonnassie, Pierre. 2009 [1985]. From Slavery to Feudalism in South-Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonney, Richard. 1978. “The French Civil War, 1649–53.” European History Quarterly 8:71–100.Google Scholar
Bonney, Richard. 1979. “The Failure of the French Revenue Farms, 1600–60.” The Economic History Review 32 (1):11–32.Google Scholar
Bonney, Richard. 1981. “Cardinal Mazarin and the Great Nobility during the Fronde.” The English Historical Review 96 (381):818–833.Google Scholar
Boogerd, Fred C. et al. 2005. “Emergence and Its Place in Nature: A Case Study of Biochemical Networks.” Synthese 145 (1):131–164.Google Scholar
Boorse, Christopher. 1976. “Wright on Functions.” The Philosophical Review 85 (1):70–86.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken. 1991. “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice.” International Affairs 67 (3):527–545.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P. et al. 2009. “Network Analysis in the Social Sciences.” Science 323 (5916):892–895.Google Scholar
Bossenga, Gail. 1991. The Politics of Privilege: Old Regime and Revolution in Lille. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bossenga, Gail. 2012. “Estates, Orders, and Corps.” In The Oxford Handbook of The Ancien Régime, edited by Doyle, William. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bossuet, Jacques. 1999 [1707]. Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Frédéric. 2013. “What Is a Symbiotic Superindividual and How Do You Measure Its Fitness?” In From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, edited by Bouchard, Frédéric and Huneman, Philippe. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Frédéric. 2018. “Symbiosis, Transcient Biological Individuality, and Evolutionary Processes.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boudon, Raymond. 1998. “Social Mechanisms without Black Boxes.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977 [1972]. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996 [1989]. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc J. D.. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc J. D.. 1993. “From Ruling Class to Field of Power: An Interview with Pierre Bourdieu on La noblesse d’État.” Theory, Culture and Society 10 (1):19–44.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, Yann et al. 2021. “Balancing Selection for Pathogen Resistance Reveals an Intercontinental Signature of Red Queen Coevolution.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 38 (11):4918–4933.Google Scholar
Bourrat, Pierrick. 2021. Facts, Conventions, and the Levels of Selection. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourrat, Pierrick and Griffiths, Paul E.. 2018. “Multispecies Individuals.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (2):1–23.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Antoine. 2017. “A Revolution in Military Affairs? Changing Technologies and Changing Practices of Warfare.” In Technology and World Politics: An Introduction, edited by McCarthy, Daniel R.. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Antoine and Curtis, Simon. 2011. “Beyond Models and Metaphors: Complexity Theory, Systems Thinking, and International Relations.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 (1):43–62.Google Scholar
Bowden, Brett. 2009. The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, Isaiah. 1921. The New World: Problems in Political Geography. World Book Company.Google Scholar
Brady, Ciaran. 1991. “The Decline of the Irish Kingdom.” In Conquest and Coalescence: The Shaping of the State in Early Modern Europe, edited by Greengrass, Mark. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E. 2008. “Causation and Explanation in Social Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brailsford, Henry Noel. 1917 [1914]. The War of Steel and Gold: A Study of Armed Peace. G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. 1982. “The Levels of Selection.” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982 (1):315–323.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. 1999. “The Units of Selection Revisited: The Modules of Selection.” Biology and Philosophy 14 (2):167–180.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2012. The Great Powers and the International System: Systemic Theory in Empirical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, Benjamin, Schindler, Sebastian, and Wille, Tobias. 2019. “Rethinking Agency in International Relations: Performativity, Performances and Actor-Networks.” Journal of International Relations and Development 22:787–807.Google Scholar
Brewer, John. 1990 [1988]. The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brigg, Morgan. 2018. “Beyond the Thrall of the State: Governance as a Relational-Affective Effect in Solomon Islands.” Cooperation and Conflict 53 (2):154–172.Google Scholar
Brillouin, L. 1950. “Thermodynamics and Information Theory.” American Scientist 38 (4):594–599.Google Scholar
Brillouin, L. 1951. “Maxwell’s Demon Cannot Operate: Information and Entropy. I.” Journal of Applied Physics 22 (3):334–337.Google Scholar
Brillouin, L. 1953. “The Negentropy Principle of Information.” Journal of Applied Physics 24 (9):1152–1163.Google Scholar
Brockhurst, Michael A. et al. 2014. “Running with the Red Queen: The Role of Biotic Conflicts in Evolution.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281 (1797):20141382.Google Scholar
Bromley, Simon. 2004. “International Politics: States, Anarchy, and Governance.” In Making the International: Economic Interdependence and Political Order, edited by Bromley, Simon, Mackintosh, Maureen, and Brown, William. Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Daniel S. 2021. “Levels of Organization as Tool and Doctrine in Biology.” In Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences, edited by Brooks, Daniel S., DiFrisco, James, and Wimsatt, William C.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Daniel S., DiFrisco, James, and Wimsatt, William C.. 2021a. “Introduction. Levels of Organization: The Architecture of the Scientific Image.” In Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences, edited by Brooks, Daniel S., DiFrisco, James, and Wimsatt, William C.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Daniel S., DiFrisco, James, and Wimsatt, William C., eds. 2021b. Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., John Ikenberry, G., and Wohlforth, William. 2012. “Don’t Come Home Again, America: The Case against Retrenchment.” International Security 37 (3):7–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Bill. 2020. “Re-Assemblage (Theory, Practice, Mode).” Critical Inquiry 46 (2):259–303.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris. 2012. “The ‘Practice Turn’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory?” Millennium 40 (3):439–456.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith M., Tanner, Roland, and Mann, Alastair J., eds. 2004. The History of the Scottish Parliament, Volume I: Parliament and Politics in Scotland, 1235–1560. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith M., Tanner, Roland, and Mann, Alastair J., eds. 2005. The History of the Scottish Parliament, Volume II: Parliament and Politics in Scotland, 1567–1707. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael E. et al., eds. 2000. Rational Choice and Security Studies: Stephen Walt and His Critics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., eds. 1995. The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Philip Marshall. 1923. International Society: Its Nature and Interests. The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Bruce, A. P. 1980. The Purchase System in the British Army, 1660–1871. Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar
Bruun, Hans Hendrik and Whimster, Same, eds. 2012. Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bucher, Bernd. 2017. “Moving beyond the Substantialist Foundations of the Agency-Structure Dichotomy: Figurational Thinking in International Relations.” Journal of International Relations and Development 20 (2):408–433.Google Scholar
Bucholz, Robert and Key, Newton. 2009. Early Modern England 1485–1714: A Narrative History. 2nd ed. Wiley.Google Scholar
Buckley, Walter Frederick, ed. 1968. Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist: A Sourcebook. Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian. 2014. “Pathways to Practice: Praxiography and International Politics.” European Political Science Review 6 (3):383–406.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian. 2016a. “Doing Europe: Agency and the European Union in the Field of Counter-Piracy Practice.” European Security 25 (4):407–422.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian. 2016b. “Security as Practice.” In Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, 2nd ed., edited by Cavelty, Myriam Dunn and Balzacq, Thierry. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian. 2018. “Territory, Authority, Expertise: Global Governance and the Counter-Piracy Assemblage.” European Journal of International Relations 24 (3):614–637.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank. 2015. “The Play of International Practice.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (3):449–460.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank. 2018. International Practice Theory. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario. 1960. “Levels: A Semantic Preliminary.” Review of Metaphysics 13 (3):396–406.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario. 1979. A World of Systems (Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Volume 4, Ontology II). D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario. 1982. “Is Chemistry a Branch of Physics?” Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (2):209–223.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario. 1992. “Systems Everywhere.” In Cybernetics and Applied Systems, edited by Negoita, Constantin Virgil. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario. 1997. “Mechanism and Explanation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (4):410–465.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario. 2000. “Systemism: The Alternative to Individualism and Holism.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 29 (2):147–157.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario. 2003. Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Roland. 2010. Decolonization and Human Rights. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, John W. 1965. International Relations: A General Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butcher, Charles and Griffiths, Ryan. 2021. “War, Interaction Capacity, and the Structures of State Systems.” International Theory 13 (2):372–396.Google Scholar
Butcher, Charles and Griffiths, Ryan D.. 2022. “Toward a Theory of Heteronomy.” International Studies Quarterly 66 (1):1–9.Google Scholar
Butler, Nicholas Murray. 1912. The International Mind: An Argument for the Judicial Settlement of International Disputes. Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin, eds. 1966. Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 1984. “Peace, Power, and Security: Contending Concepts in the Study of International Relations.” Journal of Peace Research 21 (2):109–125.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 1995. “The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations Reconsidered.” In International Relations Theory Today, edited by Booth, Ken and Smith, Steve. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International Society to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Albert, Mathias. 2010. “Differentiation: A Sociological Approach to International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 16 (3):315–337.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles A., and Little, Richard. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George. 2015. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard. 2000. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Schouenborg, Laust. 2018. Global International Society: A New Framework for Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, and de Wilde, Jaap. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Byrne, David and Callaghan, Gillian. 2014. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art. Routledge.Google Scholar
Calcott, Brett and Sterelny, Kim, eds. 2011. The Major Transitions in Evolution Revisited. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caldera, Eric J. et al. 2019. “Local Adaptation of Bacterial Symbionts within a Geographic Mosaic of Antibiotic Coevolution.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 85 (24):e01580–19.Google Scholar
Callebaut, Werner and Rasskin-Gutman, Diego, eds. 2005. Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 1998. National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia. University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1974. “‘Downward Causation’ in Hierarchically Organised Biological Systems.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ayala, Francisco José and Dobzhansky, Theodosius. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Campbell, Peter R. 2012. “Absolute Monarchy.” In The Oxford Companion of The Ancien Régime, edited by Doyle, William. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Richard J. and Bickhard, Mark H.. 2011. “Physicalism, Emergence and Downward Causation.” Axiomathes 21 (1):33–56.Google Scholar
Cannon, John. 2007. “The British Nobility, 1660–1800.” In The European Nobilities in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Volume I: Western and Southern Europe, 2nd ed., edited by Scott, H. M.. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Canto-Milà, Natàlia. 2018. “Georg Simmel’s Concept of Forms of Association as an Analytical Tool in Relational Sociology.” In The Plagrave Handbook of Relational Sociology, edited by Dépelteau, François. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cantry, Nicholas. 1995. “Irish, Scottish and Welsh Responses to Centralisation, c. 1530–c. 1640: A Comparative Perspective.” In Uniting the Kingdom? The Making of British History, edited by Grant, Alexander and Stringer, Keith. Routledge.Google Scholar
Capano, Giliberto and Howlett, Michael. 2021. “Causal Logics and Mechanisms in Policy Design: How and Why Adopting a Mechanistic Perspective Can Improve Policy Design.” Public Policy and Administration 36 (2):141–162.Google Scholar
Caporael, Linda R., Griesemer, James R., and Wimsatt, William C., eds. 2014. Developing Scaffolds in Evolution, Culture, and Cognition. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof and Luisi, Pier Luigi. 2014. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Nessa. 2012. The Epigenetics Revolution: How Modern Biology Is Rewriting Our Understanding of Genetics, Disease, and Inheritance. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Carlborg, Örjan and Haley, Chris S.. 2004. “Epistasis: Too Often Neglected in Complex Trait Studies?” Nature Reviews Genetics 5 (8):618–625.Google Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., eds. 2002. Handbook of International Relations. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., eds. 2013. Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Charli. 2011. “Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms.” International Organization 65 (1):69–102.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Christine. 1997. The Wars of the Roses: Politics and the Constitution in England, c.1437–1509. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1964 [1946]. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 2d ed. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Carroll, John W. 2016. “Laws of Nature.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward M.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/laws-of-nature/.Google Scholar
Carsten, F. L. 1959. Princes and Parliaments in Germany: From the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Century. The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Bob and Harris, Oliver J. T.. 2020. “The End of Normal Politics: Assemblages, Non-Humans and International Relations.” In Non-Human Nature in World Politics: Theory and Practice, edited by Pereira, Joana Castro and Saramago, André. Springer.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 2014. “Causal Inference.” In Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction, edited by Cartwright, Nancy and Montuschi, Eleonora. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy and Ward, Keith, eds. 2016. Rethinking Order: After the Laws of Nature. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Cat, Jordi. 2017. “The Unity of Science.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/scientific-unity/.Google Scholar
Cavelty, Myriam Dunn and Daniel Jaeger, Mark. 2015. “(In)visible Ghosts in the Machine and the Powers that Bind: The Relational Securitization of Anonymous.” International Political Sociology 9 (2):176–194.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1994. “Emergent Polarity: Analyzing State-Formation and Power Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 38 (4):501–533.Google Scholar
Cerny, Philip G. 2010. Rethinking World Politics: A Theory of Transnational Neopluralism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chafer, Tony. 2002. The End of Empire in French West Africa: France’s Successful Decolonization. Berg.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, Anjan. 2017. “Scientific Realism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Science, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Adam William and Young, Kevin L.. 2020. “Network Effects in the Formation of the Financial Industry’s Regulatory Preferences in the European Union.” Business and Politics 22 (1):52–84.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2006. “Tracing Causal Mechanisms.” International Studies Review 8 (2):362–370.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2015. “Mechanisms, Process, and the Study of International Institutions.” In Process Tracing: From Meatphor to Analytical Tool, edited by Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Bernard. 1998. “The Recovery of France, 1450–1520.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambrdige University Press.Google Scholar
Cheverud, James M. 1996. “Developmental Integration and the Evolution of Pleiotropy.” American Zoologist 36 (1):44–50.Google Scholar
Cheverud, James M. 2000. “The Genetic Architecture of Pleiotropic Relations and Differential Epistasis.” In The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology, edited by Wagner, Günter P.. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cheverud, James M. and Routman, Eric J.. 1995. “Epistasis and Its Contribution to Genetic Variance Components.” Genetics 139 (3):1455–1461.Google Scholar
Childs, John. 1982. Armies and Warfare in Europe, 1648–1789. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Chipman, Ariel D. 2021. “Developmental Exaptation.” In Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide, edited by Rosa, Laura Nuño de la and Müller, Gerd B.. Springer.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Stanley. 1972. Christian Political Theory and Church Politics in the Mid-Twelfth Century: The Ecclesiology of Gratian’s Decretum. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Christov, Theodore. 2005. “Liberal Internationalism Revisited: Grotius, Vattel, and the International Order of States.” The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms 10 (6):561–584.Google Scholar
Christov, Theodore. 2017. “The Invention of Hobbesian Anarchy.” Journal of International Political Theory 13 (3):296–310.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul M. and Hooker, Clifford, eds. 1985. Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cineda, Ion. 2006. “Complex Systems: New Conceptual Tools for International Relations.” Perspectives (26):46–68.Google Scholar
Clapton, William. 2014. Risk and Hierarchy in International Society: Liberal Interventionism in the Post-Cold War Era. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clark, Samuel. 1995. State and Status: The Rise of the State and Aristocratic Power in Western Europe. McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Ellen. 2010. “The Problem of Biological Individuality.” Biological Theory 5 (4):312–325.Google Scholar
Clarke, Killian and Kocak, Korhan. 2020. “Launching Revolution: Social Media and the Egyptian Uprising’s First Movers.” British Journal of Political Science 50 (3):1025–1045.Google Scholar
Clastres, Pierre. 1972. “The Guayaki.” In Hunters and Gatherers Today: A Socioeconomic Study of Eleven Such Cultures in the Twentieth Century, edited by Bicchieri, M. G.. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Clastres, Pierre. 1977 [1974]. Society Against the State: The Leader as Servant and the Humane Use of Power among the Indians of the Americas. Urizen Books.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly. 2001. “What Does it Mean to Be an American Social Science? A Pragmatist Case for Diversity in International Relations.” In International Relations – Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought, edited by Crawford, Robert M. A. and Jarvis, David S. L.. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly. 2002. “Deweyan Pragmatism and Post-Positivist Social Science in IR.” Millennium 31 (3):525–548.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly. 2012. “Pragmatism and International Relations: A Story of Closure and Opening.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4 (IV-1). 10.4000/ejpap.777.Google Scholar
Cohen, Saul Bernard. 2009. Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Colas, Alejandro. 2016. “Barbary Coast in the Expansion of International Society: Piracy, Privateering, and Corsairing as Primary Institutions.” Review of International Studies 42 (5):840–857.Google Scholar
Collar, Anna et al. 2015. “Networks in Archaeology: Phenomena, Abstraction, Representation.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22 (1):1–32.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4):823–830.Google Scholar
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E., and Seawright, Jason. 2010. “Introduction to the Second Edition.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed., edited by Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Collier, Jamie. 2018. “Cyber Security Assemblages: A Framework for Understanding the Dynamic and Contested Nature of Security Provision.” Politics and Governance 6 (2):13–21.Google Scholar
Collins, James B. 1994. Classes, Estates, and Order in Early Modern Brittany. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colyvas, Jeannette A. and Maroulis, Spiro. 2012. “Academic Laboratories and the Reproduction of Proprietary Science: Modeling Organizational Rules through Auutocatalytic Networks.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Conca Messina, Silvia A. 2019 [2016]. A History of States and Economic Policies in Early Modern Europe. Routledge.Google Scholar
Connelly, Brian D. et al. 2016. “Negative Niche Construction Favors the Evolution of Cooperation.” Evolutionary Ecology 30 (2):267–283.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale. 2003. “A Realist Critique of the English School.” Review of International Studies 29 (3):427–441.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale. 2012. “Realism and Neorealism in the Study of Regional Conflict.” In International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, edited by Paul, T. V.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cordell, Heather J. 2002. “Epistasis: What It Means, What It Doesn’t Mean, and Statistical Methods to Detect It in Humans.” Human Molecular Genetics 11 (20):2463–2468.Google Scholar
Cordes, Christian. 2006. “Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Continuity.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16 (5):529–541.Google Scholar
Corvisier, André. 1979 [1976]. Armies and Societies in Europe, 1494–1789. University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Costa-Buranelli, Filippo. 2015. “‘Do You Know What I Mean?’ ‘Not Exactly’: English School, Global International Society and the Polysemy of Institutions.” Global Discourse 5 (3):499–514.Google Scholar
Costa, Fernando Dores. 2021. “Was There an Early Modern Military Revolution in Mainland Portugal?” In The First World Empire: Portugal, War, and Military Revolution, edited by Carvalhal, Hélder, Murteira, André, and Jesus, Roger Lee de. Routledge.Google Scholar
Costa Buranelli, Filippo. 2020. “Standard of Civilization, Nomadism and Territoriality in Nineteenth-Century International Society.” In Nomad-State Relationships in International Relations: Before and after Borders, edited by Levin, Jamie. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Costello, Elizabeth K. et al. 2012. “The Application of Ecological Theory towards an Understanding of the Human Microbiome.” Science 336 (6086):1255–1262.Google Scholar
Côté-Boucher, Karine, Infantino, Federica, and Salter, Mark B.. 2014. “Border Security as Practice: An Agenda for Research.” Security Dialogue 45 (3):195–208.Google Scholar
Cox, Kevin R., Low, Murray, and Robinson, Jennifer, eds. 2009. The SAGE Handbook of Political Geography. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1981. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium 10 (2):126–155.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. 2001. “Role Functions, Mechanisms, and Hierarchy.” Philosophy of Science 68 (1):53–74.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. 2015. “Levels and Emergence.” In Open MIND: 8(R), edited by Metzinger, Thomas K. and Windt, Jennifer M.. MIND Group.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. 2016. “The Explanatory Power of Network Models.” Philosophy of Science 83 (5):698–709.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. and Darden, Lindley. 2013. In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. and Kaiser, Marie I.. 2013. “Mechanisms and Laws: Clarifying the Debate.” In Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics, edited by Chao, Ksiang-Ke, Chen, Szu-Ting, and Millstein, Roberta L.. Springer.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. and Kaplan, David M.. 2020. “Are More Details Better? On the Norms of Completeness for Mechanistic Explanations.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (1):287–319.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. and Tabery, James. 2019. “Mechanisms in Science.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/science-mechanisms/.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. et al. 2020. “Gloomy Prospects and Roller Coasters: Finding Coherence in Genome-Wide Association Studies.” Philosophy of Science 87 (5):1084–1095.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Creath, Richard. 2022. “Logical Empiricism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/logical-empiricism.Google Scholar
Cronin, Bruce. 1999. Community under Anarchy: Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Crossley, Nick. 2013. “Interactions, Juxtapositions, and Tastes: Conceptualizing ‘Relations’ in Relational Sociology.” In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, edited by Powell, Christopher and Dépelteau, François. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Crumley, Carole L. 1987. “Celtic Settlement before the Conquest: The Dialectics of Landscape and Power.” In Regional Dynamics: Burgundian Landscapes in Historical Perspective, edited by Crumley, Carole L. and Marquardt, William H.. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Crumley, Carole L. 2005. “Remember How to Organize: Heterarchy across Disciplines.” In Nonlinear Models for Archaeology and Anthropology: Continuing the Revolution, edited by Beekman, Christopher S. and Baden, William W.. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Erika and Hobden, Stephen. 2013. “Complexity, Ecologism, and Posthuman Politics.” Review of International Studies 39 (3):643–664.Google Scholar
Cui, Shunji and Buzan, Barry. 2016. “Great Power Management in International Society.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9 (2):181–210.Google Scholar
Curry, Dion. 2006. “Relations Revisited: A Nuanced Approach to Multilevel Governance.” CEU Political Science Journal 5:77–93.Google Scholar
Damiano, Luisa and Luisi, Pier Luigi. 2010. “Towards an Autopoietic Redefinition of Life.” Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 40 (2):145–149.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley. 2002. “Strategies for Discovering Mechanisms: Schema Instantiation, Modular Subassembly, Forward/Backward Chaining.” Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S354–S365.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley. 2008. “Thinking Again about Biological Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 75 (5):958–969.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley. 2013. “Mechanisms versus Causes in Biology and Medicine.” In Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics, edited by Chao, Ksiang-Ke, Chen, Szu-Ting, and Millstein, Roberta L.. Springer.Google Scholar
Daugherty, William H. 1993. “System Management and the Endurance of the Concert of Europe.” In Coping with Complexity in the International System, edited by Snyder, Jack L. and Jervis, Robert. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Andrew. 2013. “Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist Fate?” European Journal of International Relations 19 (1):27–48.Google Scholar
Davenport, Andrew. 2020. “Multiplicity: Anarchy in the Mirror of Sociology.” Globalizations 17 (3):532–545.Google Scholar
Davidson, Eric H. 2001. Genomic Regulatory Systems: Development and Evolution. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Eric H. 2006. The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks in Development and Evolution. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mathew. 2016. “A Community of Practice: Explaining Change and Continuity in ASEAN’s Diplomatic Environment.” The Pacific Review 29 (2):211–233.Google Scholar
Davies, Sara E. and True, Jacqui, eds. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davison, Dinah R. and Michod, Richard E.. 2021. “Phenotypic Plasticity and Evolutionary Transitions in Individuality.” In Phenotypic Plasticity & Evolution: Causes, Consequences, Controversies, edited by Pfennig, David W.. CRC Press.Google Scholar
De Keersmaeker, Goedele. 2014. “Polariteit als basisconcept van de Internationale Betrekkingen: theoretische analyse, historische situering en hedendaagse relevantie.” PhD Thesis. Ghent University.Google Scholar
De Keersmaeker, Goedele. 2017. Polarity, Balance of Power, and International Relations Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
De Visser, J. Arjan G. M., Cooper, Tim F., and Elena, Santiago F.. 2011. “The Causes of Epistasis.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278 (1725):3617–3624.Google Scholar
Debray, Eva. 2015. “Evolutionary Economics: A Specific Form of Evolution?” In Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences, edited by Heams, Thomas et al. SpringerGoogle Scholar
DeGarmo, Denise. 2005. International Environmental Treaties and State Behavior: Factors Influencing Cooperation. Routledge.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole and Daase, Christopher. 2021. “Rule and Resistance in Global Governance.” International Theory 13 (1):122–130.Google Scholar
Del Treppo, Mario. 1998. “Aragon.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeLanda, Manuel. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix. 1987 [1980]. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Demetriou, Chares. 2012. “Processual Comparative Sociology: Building on the Approach of Charles Tilly.” Sociological Theory 30 (1):51–65.Google Scholar
Demeulenaere, Pierre, ed. 2011. Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Denemark, Robert A. 2021. “World-Systems Analysis.” In Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations, edited by de Carvalho, Benjamin, Lopez, Julia Costa, and Leira, Halvard. Routledge.Google Scholar
Dépelteau, François. 2013. “Comparing Elias and Bourdieu as Relational Thinkers.” In Norbert Elias and Social Theory, edited by Dépelteau, François and Landini, Tatiana Savpoia. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dépelteau, François and Savpoia Landini, Tatiana, eds. 2013. Norbert Elias and Social Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Der Derian, James and Wendt, Alexander. 2020. “‘Quantizing International Relations’: The Case for Quantum Approaches to International Theory and Security Practice.” Security Dialogue 51 (5):399–413.Google Scholar
Dessler, David. 1989. “What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization 43 (3):441–474.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel. 1995. “The Philadelphian System: Sovereignty, Arms Control, and Balance of Power in the American States-Union, circa 1787–1861.” International Organization 49 (2):191–228.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel. 2007. Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel and John Ikenberry, G.. 1999. “The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order.” Review of International Studies 25 (2):179–196.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. 1953. Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. Wiley.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. 1963. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. and David Singer, J.. 1964. “Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability.” World Politics 16 (3):390–406.Google Scholar
Di Floristella, Angela Pennisi. 2015. The ASEAN Regional Security Partnership: Strengths and Limits of a Cooperative System. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Edwin DeWitt. 1920a. The Equality of States in International Law. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Difrisco, James. 2018. “Biological Processes: Criteria of Identity and Persistence.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Difrisco, James and Jaeger, Johannes. 2019. “Beyond Networks: Mechanism and Process in Evo-Devo.” Biology & Philosophy 34 (6) 1–24.Google Scholar
Dillon Savage, Jesse 2021. “Common-Pool Hierarchy: Explaining the Emergence of Cooperative Hierarchies.” International Studies Quarterly 65 (3):712–723.Google Scholar
Dittmer, Jason. 2015. “Everyday Diplomacy: UK-USA Intelligence Cooperation and Geopolitical Assemblages.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (3):604–619.Google Scholar
Dixon, Peter and Tenove, Chris. 2013. “International Criminal Justice as a Transnational Field: Rules, Authority and Victims.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 7 (3):393–412.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1951 [1937]. Genetics and the Origin of Species. 3rd ed. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dodds, Klaus. 2014. Geopolitics: A Very Short Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, Peter. 1998. “Haute Finance and High Theory: Recent Scholarship on Global Financial Relations.” Mershon International Studies Review 42 (1):1–28.Google Scholar
Domingo, Júlia, Baeza-Centurion, Pablo, and Lehner, Ben. 2019. “The Causes and Consequences of Genetic Interactions (Epistasis).” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 20 (1):433–460.Google Scholar
Donati, Pierpaolo. 2011. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. Routledge.Google Scholar
Donati, Pierpaolo and Archer, Margaret S.. 2015. The Relational Subject. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1998. “Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization?” International Affairs 74 (1):1–24.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2006. “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (2):139–170.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2009. “Rethinking Political Structures: From ‘Ordering Principles’ to ‘Vertical Differentiation’ – and Beyond.” International Theory 1 (1):49–86.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2012. “The Elements of the Structures of International Systems.” International Organization 66 (4):609–643.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2013. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2015. “Normative versus Taxonomic Humanity: Varieties of Human Dignity in the Western Tradition.” Journal of Human Rights 14 (1):1–22.Google Scholar
Dorussen, Han, Gartzke, Erik A., and Westerwinter, Oliver. 2016. “Networked International Politics: Complex Interdependence and the Diffusion of Conflict and Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 53 (3):283–291.Google Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni and Nelson, Richard R.. 1994. “An Introduction to Evolutionary Theories in Economics.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4 (3):153–172.Google Scholar
Dougherty, James and Pfaltzgraff, William Jr. 1971. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Dougherty, James and Pfaltzgraff, William Jr. 1981. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. 2nd ed. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dougherty, James and Pfaltzgraff, William Jr. 1990. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. 3rd ed. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dougherty, James and William Pflatzgraff Jr. 1997. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. 4th ed. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Downing, Brian M. 1992. The Military Revolution and Political Change: Origins of Democracy and Autocracy in Early Modern Europe. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):205–235.Google Scholar
Doyle, William. 1992. The Old European Order, 1660–1800. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, William. 1996. Venality: The Sale of Offices in Eighteenth-Century France. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, William, ed. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of the Ancien Régime. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drago, Antonino. 2020. “A New Definition of Reduction between Two Scientific Theories: No Reduction of Chemistry to Quantum Mechanics.” Foundations of Chemistry 22 (3):421–445.Google Scholar
Druzin, Bryan H. 2014. “Opening the Machinery of Private Order: Public International Law as a Form of Private Ordering.” Saint Louis University Law Journal 58 (2):423–466.Google Scholar
Druzin, Bryan H. 2021. “Can the Liberal Order Be Sustained? Nations, Network Effects, and the Erosion of Global Institutions.” Michigan Journal of International Law 42 (1):1–46.Google Scholar
Duarte Villa, Rafael. 2017. “Security Community or Balance of Power? Hybrid Security Governance in Latin America.” In Power Dynamics and Regional Security in Latin America, edited by Suarez, Marcial A. G., Villa, Rafael Duarte, and Weiffen, Brigitte. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. 1980 [1978]. The Three Orders: Feudal Society Imagined. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Duffield, John S. 2001. “Transatlantic Relations after the Cold War: Theory, Evidence, and the Future.” International Studies Perspectives 2 (1):93–115.Google Scholar
Duffy, Michael, ed. 1980. The Military Revolution and the State: 1500–1800. University of Exeter, Department of History and Archaeology.Google Scholar
Dunn, Frederick Sherwood. 1937. Peaceful Change: A Study of International Procedures. Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Dunn, Frederick Sherwood. 1950. War and the Minds of Men. Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim, Cox, Michael, and Booth, Ken, eds. 1998. The Eighty Years’ Crisis: International Relations 1919–1999. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian, eds. 2017. The Globalization of International Society. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. 1995. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. 2020. “Life As Process.” Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 57 (2):96–113.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. 2021. “Processes within Processes: A Dynamic Account of Living Beings and Its Implications for Understanding the Human Individual.” In Biological Identity: Perspectives from Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Meincke, Anne Sophie and Dupré, John. Routledge.Google Scholar
Dupré, John A. and Nicholson, Daniel J.. 2018. “A Manifesto for a Processual Philosophy of Biology.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duque, Marina G. 2018. “Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach.” International Studies Quarterly 62 (3):577–592.Google Scholar
Duran, Manuel. 2022. “Regional Diplomacy: Re-Territorialisation as a Piece in the Neo-Medieval Puzzle?” In Geopolitics and International Relations: Grounding World Politics Anew, edited by Crieksmans, David. Brill.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 2013 [1895]. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Methods. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Dutkiewicz, Piotr, Casier, Tom, and Arte Scholte, Jan, eds. 2021. Hegemony and World Order: Reimagining Power in Global Politics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Dyer, Christopher. 1998. “Rural Europe.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Earle, Edward Meade, Craig, Gordon A., and Gilbert, Felix, eds. 1943. Makers of Modern Strategy: Military Thought from Machiavelli to Hitler. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Arthur. 2017. “Thucydides, International Law, and International Anarchy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides, edited by Forsdyke, Sara, Foster, Edith, and Balot, Ryan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eder, James F. 1999. “Batak.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Robert M., Crumley, Carole L., and Levy, Janet E., eds. 1995. Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies. American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul R. and Raven, Peter H.. 1964. “Butterflies and Plants: A Study in Coevolution.” Evolution 18 (4):586–608.Google Scholar
Eigen, Manfred. 1971. “Self-Organization of Matter and the Evolution of Biological Macromolecules.” Die Naturwissenschaften 58:465–523.Google Scholar
Eigen, Manfred and Schuster, Peter. 1977. “The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization (Part One).” Die Naturwissenschaften 64:541–565.Google Scholar
Eigen, Manfred and Schuster, Peter. 1978a. “The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization (Part Three).” Die Naturwissenschaften 65:341–369.Google Scholar
Eigen, Manfred and Schuster, Peter. 1978b. “The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization (Part Two).” Die Naturwissenschaften 65:7–41.Google Scholar
Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette. 2014. “Network Theory and Security Governance.” In Handbook of Governance and Security, edited by Sperling, James. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1964. “Social Change, Differentiation and Evolution.” American Sociological Review 29 (3):375–386.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1993 [1963]. The Political System of Empires. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave. 2007a. “For Emergence: Refining Archer’s Account of Social Structure.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (1):25–44.Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave. 2007b. “Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an Emergentist Theory of Action.” Sociological Theory 25 (4):325–346.Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave. 2012. “Top-Down Causation and Social Structures.” Interface Focus 2 (1):82–90.Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, Dave. 2014. “Social Entities and the Basis of Their Powers.” In Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate, edited by Zahle, Julie and Collin, Finn. Springer.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles. 1985. Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles. 1996. “Hierarchies in Macroevolution.” In Evolutionary Paleobiology, edited by Valentine, James W.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles and Jay Gould, Stephen. 1972. “Punctuated Equillibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology, edited by Schopf, Thomas J. M.. Feeeman, Cooper.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles et al., eds. 2016. Evolutionary Theory: A Hierarchical Perspective. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 2000 [1939]. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Rev. ed. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. H. 1963. The Revolt of the Catalans: A Study in the Decline of Spain. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. H. 1969. “Revolution and Continuity in Early Modern Europe.” Past & Present 42:35–56.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. H. 1986. The Count-Duke of Olivares: The Statesman in an Age of Decline. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. H. and Brockliss, L. W. B., eds. 1999. The World of the Favourite. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius. 1997. “Lakatos and Neorealism: A Reply to Vasquez.” American Political Science Review 91 (4):923–926.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius, eds. 2003. Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elrod, Richard B. 1976. “The Concert of Europe: A Fresh Look at an International System.” World Politics 28 (2):159–174.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2015. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Revised ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eltis, David. 1995. The Military Revolution in Sixteenth-Century Europe. I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (2):281–317.Google Scholar
Emmeche, Claus, Køppe, Simo, and Stjernfelt, Frederik. 1997. “Explaining Emergence: Towards an Ontology of Levels.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (1):83–117.Google Scholar
Emmeche, Claus, Køppe, Simo, and Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2000. “Levels, Emergence, and Three Versions of Downward Causation.” In Downward Causation: Minds, Bodies and Matter, edited by Andersen, Peter Bogh et al. Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Endicott, Karen L. 1999. “Gender Relations in Hunter-Gatherer Societies.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia H. 2001 [1989]. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Gil S. 2008. “Herd and Network Effects in Migration Decision-Making.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34 (4):567–583.Google Scholar
Epstein, Joshua M. 2006. Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven A. 2009. An Economic and Social History of Later Medieval Europe, 1000–1500. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc, ed. 1992. The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, Marc and Pedroso, Makmiller. 2013. “Biological Individuality: The Case of Biofilms.” Biology & Philosophy 28 (2):331–349.Google Scholar
Erikson, Emily and Occhiuto, Nicholas. 2017. “Social Networks and Macrosocial Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 43:229–248.Google Scholar
Eronen, Markus I. 2021. “Levels, Nests, and Branches: Compositional Organization and Downward Causation in Biology.” In Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences, edited by Brooks, Daniel S., DiFrisco, James, and Wimsatt, William C.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eronen, Markus I. and Brooks, Daniel Stephen. 2018. “Levels of Organization in Biology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/levels-org-biology/.Google Scholar
Ertman, Thomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ertman, Thomas. 2005. “Building States – Inherently a Long-Term Process? An Argument from Comparative History.” In States and Development: Historical Antecedents of Stagnation and Advance, edited by Lange, Matthew and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Erwin, Douglas H. 2008. “Macroevolution of Ecosystem Engineering, Niche Construction and Diversity.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23 (6):304–310.Google Scholar
Falkner, Robert and Buzan, Barry. 2019. “The Emergence of Environmental Stewardship as a Primary Institution of Global International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 25 (1):131–155.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. and Lynch, Julia F.. 2009. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (9):1143–1166.Google Scholar
Faludi, Andreas. 2018. The Poverty of Territorialism: A Neo-Medieval View of Europe and European Planning. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Fararo, Thomas J. 2011. “Generative Process Model Building.” In Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, edited by Demeulenaere, Pierre. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faude, Benjamin and Groβe-Kreul, Felix. 2020. “Let’s Justify! How Regime Complexes Enhance the Normative Legitimacy of Global Governance.” International Studies Quarterly 64 (2):431–439.Google Scholar
Fehl, Caroline and Freistein, Katja. 2020. “Organising Global Stratification: How International Organisations (Re)produce Inequalities in International Society.” Global Society 34 (3):285–303.Google Scholar
Félix, Joël. 2012. “Finances.” In The Oxford Companion of the Ancien Régime, edited by Doyle, William. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Yale H. and Mansbach, Richard W.. 1988. The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics. University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Yale H. and Mansbach, Richard W.. 1996. Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change. University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Feros, Antonio. 2000. Kingship and Favoritism in the Spain of Philip III, 1598–1621. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Figgis, J. Neville. 1896. The Theory of the Divine Right of Kings. The [Cambridge] University Press.Google Scholar
Findlay, C. Scott and Lumsden, Charles J.. 1988. “The Creative Mind: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Discovery and Innovation.” Journal of Social and Biological Systems 11 (1):3–55.Google Scholar
Finley-Croswhite, S. Annette. 1999. Henry IV and the Towns: The Pursuit of Legitimacy in French Urban Society, 1589–1610. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Daniel X. O. 2018. “Situating Border Control: Unpacking Spain’s SIVE Border Surveillance Assemblage.” Political Geography 65:67–76.Google Scholar
Flanagan, James G. and Rayner, Steve. 1988. “Introduction.” In Rules, Decisions, and Inequality in Egalitarian Societies, edited by Flanagan, James G. and Rayner, Steve. Avebury.Google Scholar
Flood, Robert L. and Carson, Ewart R.. 1993. Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science. 2nd ed. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Floridi, Luciano. 2008. “The Method of Levels of Abstraction.” Minds and Machines 18 (3):303–329.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1974. “Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis).” Synthese 28 (2):97–115.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. 1920. The New State: Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government. Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Fortna, Virginia Page. 2004. “Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms and Empirical Effects.” World Politics: 481–519.Google Scholar
Fowler, Chris. 2013. The Emergent Past: A Relational Realist Archaeology of Early Bronze Age Mortuary Practices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, Chris. 2017. “Relational Typologies, Assemblage Theory and Early Bronze Age Burials.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27 (1):95–109.Google Scholar
Fox, Nick J. and Alldred, Pam. 2020. “Re-assembling Climate Change Policy: Materialism, Posthumanism, and the Policy Assemblage.” The British Journal of Sociology 71 (2):269–283.Google Scholar
Fox, William T. R. 1944. The Super-Powers: The United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union – Their Responsibility for Peace. Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Fox, William T. R., ed. 1959. Theoretical Aspects of International Relations. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Francis, Richard C. 2011. Epigenetics: How Environment Shapes Our Genes. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Freedman, Paul H. 2000. “Rural Society.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume VI c. 1300–c. 1415, edited by Jones, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron L. 2005. “The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?” International Security 30 (2):7–45.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl Joachim. 1938. Foreign Policy in the Making: The Search for a New Balance of Power. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg. 2001. “The Meaning of New Medievalism.” European Journal of International Relations 7 (4):475–501.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg. 2016. “Causal Mechanisms and Process Patterns in International Relations: Thinking within and without the Box.” St Antony’s International Review 12 (1):76–89.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg and Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2009. “On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology.” International Organization 63 (4):701–731.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman and Hartman, Stephan. 2020. “Models in Science.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Stephan. 2001. Against Essentialism: A Theory of Culture and Society. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Horst. 1986 [1983]. Germany in the High Middle Ages c. 1050–1200. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gabora, Liane and Steel, Mike. 2017. “Autocatalytic Networks in Cognition and the Origin of Culture.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 431:87–95.Google Scholar
Gade, Emily Kalah et al. 2019. “Networks of Cooperation: Rebel Alliances in Fragmented Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (9):2071–2097.Google Scholar
Gadinger, Frank and Peters, Dirk. 2016. “Feedback Loops in a World of Complexity: A Cybernetic Approach at the Interface of Foreign Policy Analysis and International Relations Theory.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (1):251–269.Google Scholar
Galis, Frietson and Metz, Johan A. J.. 2021. “A Macroevolutionary Perspective on Developmental Constraints in Animals.” In Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide, edited by la Rosa, Laura Nuño de and Müller, Gerd B.. Springer.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter and Stump, David J., eds. 1996. The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallop, Max and Minhas, Shahryar. 2021. “A Network Approach to Measuring State Preferences.” Network Science 9 (2):135–152.Google Scholar
Galton, Antony. 2006. “On What Goes On: The Ontology of Processes and Events.” In Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (FOIS 2006), edited by Bennett, Brandon and Fellbaum, Christiane. IOS Press.Google Scholar
Galton, Antony and Mizoguchi, Riichiro. 2009. “The Water Falls but the Waterfall Does Not Fall: New Perspectives on Objects, Processes and Events.” Applied Ontology 4 (2):71–107.Google Scholar
Gardner, Peter. 1972. “The Paliyans.” In Hunters and Gatherers Today: A Socioeconomic Study of Eleven Such Cultures in the Twentieth Century, edited by Bicchieri, M. G.. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gardner, Peter. 1999. “The Paliyan.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garnsey, Elizabeth and McGlade, James, eds. 2006. Complexity and Co-evolution: Continuity and Change in Socio-Economic Systems. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Garson, Justin. 2019. What Biological Functions Are and Why They Matter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gatti, Roberto Cazzolla et al. 2018. “Niche Emergence as an Autocatalytic Process in the Evolution of Ecosystems.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 454:110–117.Google Scholar
Gazit, Orit. 2019. “Van Gennep Meets Ontological (In)Security: A Processual Approach to Ontological Security in Migration.” International Studies Review 21 (4):572–597.Google Scholar
Geldenhuys, Deon. 2014. “The African Union, Responsible Sovereignty, and Contested States.” Global Responsibility to Protect 6 (3):350–374.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray. 1994. “Complex Adaptive Systems.” In Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. No.19. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gentles, Ian. 2014 [2007]. The English Revolution and the Wars in the Three Kingdoms, 1638–1652. Routledge.Google Scholar
George, Jason T. and Levine, Herbert. 2021. “Implications of Tumor–Immune Coevolution on Cancer Evasion and Optimized Immunotherapy.” Trends in Cancer 7 (4):373–383.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J. 2009. Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms: Yes, But ….” Comparative Political Studies 43 (11):1499–1526.Google Scholar
Getz, Kathleen A. 2006. “The Effectiveness of Global Prohibition Regimes: Corruption and the Antibribery Convention.” Business & Society 45 (3):254–281.Google Scholar
Gheciu, Alexandra and Wohlforth, William C., eds. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of International Security. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, Michael T. 1974. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.” Systematic Biology 23 (4):536–544.Google Scholar
Gibson, Thomas. 1985. “The Sharing of Substance versus the Sharing of Activity among the Buid.” Man 20 (3):391–411.Google Scholar
Gibson, Thomas. 1986. Sacrifice and Sharing in the Philippine Highlands: Religion and Society among the Buid of Mindoro. Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 2004. “How Models Are Used to Represent Reality.” Philosophy of Science 71 (5):742–752.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 2006a. “Modest Evolutionary Naturalism.” Biological Theory 1 (1):52–60.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 2010. “An Agent-Based Conception of Models and Scientific Representation.” Synthese 172 (2):269–281.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 2014. “Naturalism.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, 2nd ed., edited by Curd, Martin and Psillos, Stathis. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Jack A. et al. 2018. “Current Understanding of the Human Microbiome.” Nature Medicine 24 (4):392–400.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Scott F. 2018. “Rethinking Parts and Wholes.” In Landscapes of Collectivity in the Life Sciences, edited by Gissis, Snait B., Lamm, Ehud, and Shavit, Ayelet. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Scott F. 2019. “Evolutionary Transitions Revisited: Holobiont Evo-Devo.” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 332 (8):307–314.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Scott F., Bosch, Thomas C. G., and Ledón-Rettig, Cristina. 2015. “Eco-Evo-Devo: Developmental Symbiosis and Developmental Plasticity as Evolutionary Agents.” Nature Reviews Genetics 16 (10):611–622.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Scott F. and Tauber, Alfred I.. 2016. “Rethinking Individuality: The Dialectics of the Holobiont.” Biology & Philosophy 31 (6):839–853.Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen, ed. 1993. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1975. U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Direct Foreign Investment. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gissis, Snait B., Lamm, Ehud, and Shavit, Ayelet. 2018. Landscapes of Collectivity in the Life Sciences. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. 2010. Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. and Kaufmann, Chaim. 1998. “What is the Offense-Defense Balance and Can We Measure It?” International Security 22 (4):44–82.Google Scholar
Glenn, John. 2009. “Realism versus Strategic Culture: Competition and Collaboration?” International Studies Review 11 (3):523–551.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart. 2010. “Mechanisms, Causes, and the Layered Model of the World.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2):362–381.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart. 2016. “Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy.” In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, edited by Humphreys, Paul. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart and Illari, Phyllis, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Glete, Jan. 2002. War and the State in Early Modern Europe: Spain, the Dutch Republic and Sweden as Fiscal-Military States. Routledge.Google Scholar
Glouberman, Sholom and Zimmerman, Brenda. 2012. Complicated and Complex Systems: What Would Successful Reform of Medicare Look Like? Ottawa: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/235920/publication.html.Google Scholar
Go, Julian. 2008. “Global Fields and Imperial Forms: Field Theory and the British and American Empires.” Sociological Theory 26 (3):201–229.Google Scholar
Go, Julian. 2011. Patterns of Empire: The British and American Empires, 1688 to the Present. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Go, Julian and Krause, Monika. 2016. “Fielding Transnationalism: An Introduction.” The Sociological Review 64 (2 suppl):6–30.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2009a. “Brokering Change: Networks and Entrepreneurs in International Politics.” International Theory 1 (2):249–281.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2009b. Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E., MacDonald, Paul K., and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2019. “Repertoires of Statecraft: Instruments and Logics of Power Politics.” International Relations 33 (2):304–321.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2005. “Paradigm Lost? Reassessing Theory of International Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 11 (1):9–61.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2006. “The Strategy of Model-Based Science.” Biology and Philosophy 21 (5):725–740.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2016. “Individuality and Life Cycles.” In Individuals across the Sciences, edited by Guay, Alexandre and Pradeu, Thomas. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goemans, Hein and Spaniel, William. 2016. “Multimethod Research: A Case for Formal Theory.” Security Studies 25 (1):25–33.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2017. Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goh, Evelyn. 2008. “Hierarchy and the Role of the United States in the East Asian Security Order.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 8 (3):353–377.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Ilan and Erenreich, Ian M.. 2021. “Genetic Variation in Phenotypic Plasticity.” In Phenotypic Plasticity & Evolution: Causes, Consequences, Controversies, edited by Pfennig, David W.. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Martin and Goldstein, Inga F.. 1995. The Refrigerator and the Universe: Understanding the Laws of Energy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez-Márquez, Jaime. 2021. “What is Life?” Molecular Biology Reports 48 (8):6223–6230.Google Scholar
Gómez-Mera, Laura, Morin, Jean-Frédéric, and Van de Graaf, Thijs. 2020. “Regime Complexes.” In Architectures of Earth System Governance: Institutional Complexity and Structural Transformation, edited by Biermann, Frank and Kim, Rahkyun E.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gomulkiewicz, Richard et al. 2007. “Dos and Don’ts of Testing the Geographic Mosaic Theory of Coevolution.” Heredity 98 (5):249–258.Google Scholar
Gomulkiewicz, Richard et al. 2000. “Hot Spots, Cold Spots, and the Geographic Mosaic Theory of Coevolution.” The American Naturalist 156 (2):156–174.Google Scholar
Gong, Gerrit W. 1984. The Standard of ‘Civilisation’ in International Society. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana. 2009. “The Primary Institutions of the Middle Eastern Regional Interstate Society.” In International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level, edited by Buzan, Barry and Gonzalez-Pelaez, Ana. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Michael. 2005. Democracy as Human Rights: Freedom and Equality in the Age of Globalization. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip S. 2003. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip S. 2005. “The Protestant Ethic and the Bureaucratic Revolution: Ascetic Protestantism and Administrative Rationalization in Early Modern Europe.” In Max Weber’s Economy and Society: A Critical Companion, edited by Camic, Charles, Gorski, Philip S., and Trubek, David M.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Götz, Elias. 2021. “Neoclassical Realist Theories, Intervening Variables, and Paradigmatic Boundaries.” Foreign Policy Analysis 17 (2):oraa026.Google Scholar
Gougen, Joseph A. and Varela, Francisco J.. 1979. “Systems and Distinctions: Duality and Complementarity.” International Journal of General Systems 5 (1):31–43.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1980. “The Evolutionary Biology of Constraint.” Daedalus 109 (2):39–52.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1997. “The Exaptive Excellence of Spandrels as a Term and Prototype.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94 (20):10750–10755.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2001. “The Evolutionary Definition of Selective Agency, Validation of the Theory of Hierarchical Selection, and Fallacy of the Selfish Gene.” In Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspective, edited by Singh, Rama S. et al. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay and Lewontin, Richard C.. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 205 (1161):581–598.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay and Lloyd, Elisabeth A.. 1999. “Individuality and Adaptation across Levels of Selection: How Shall We Name and Generalize the Units of Darwinism?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96 (21):11904–11909.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay and Vrba, Elisabeth S.. 1982. “Exaptation – A Missing Term in the Science of Form.” Paleobiology 8 (1):4–15.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gowdy, John. 1999. “Hunter-Gatherers and the Mythology of the Market.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gowdy, John. 2013. Coevolutionary Economics: The Economy, Society and the Environment. SpringerGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Franciszek and Strzalka, Dominik. 2008. Simple, Complicated and Complex Systems: The Brief Introduction. In 2008 Conference on Human Systems Interactions. Krakow, Poland, 25–27 May.Google Scholar
Graham, Aaron and Walsh, Patrick, eds. 2016. The British Fiscal-Military States, 1660–c.1783. Routledge.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6):1360–1380.Google Scholar
Grant, A. J. et al. 1916. An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Graves, Michael A. R. 2001. The Parliaments of Early Modern Europe. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Green, Jessica F. 2022a. “Hierarchy in Regime Complexes: Understanding Authority in Antarctica.” International Studies Quarterly 66 (1):sqab084.Google Scholar
Green, Sara. 2017. Philosophy of Systems Biology: Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers. Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Green, Sara. 2022b. “Philosophy of Systems and Synthetic Biology.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/systems-synthetic-biology/.Google Scholar
Greengrass, Mark. 1991. “Conquest and Coalescence.” In Conquest and Coalescence: The Shaping of the State in Early Modern Europe, edited by Greengrass, Mark. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds. 1975. Handbook of Political Science, Volume 8: International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie. 1967. “Biology and the Problem of Levels of Reality.” The New Scholasticism 41 (4):427–449.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42 (3):485–507.Google Scholar
Griesemer, James. 2000. “Development, Culture, and the Units of Inheritance.” Philosophy of Science 67 (S3):S348–S368.Google Scholar
Griesemer, James. 2001. “The Units of Evolutionary Transition.” Selection 1 (1–3):67–80.Google Scholar
Griesemer, James. 2018. “Individuation of Developmental Systems: A Reproducer Perspective.” In Individuation, Process, and Scientific Practices, edited by Bueno, Otávio, Chen, Ruey-Lin, and Fagan, Melinda Bonnie. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griesemer, James 2021. “Levels, Perspectives, and Thickets: Toward an Ontology of Scaffolded Living Systems.” In Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences, edited by Brooks, Daniel S., DiFrisco, James, and Wimsatt, William C.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Ryan D. 2018. “The Waltzian Ordering Principle and International Change: A Two-Dimensional Model.” European Journal of International Relations 24 (1):130–152.Google Scholar
Guay, Alexandre and Pradeu, Thomas, eds. 2016a. Individuals across the Sciences. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guay, Alexandre and Pradeu, Thomas. 2016b. “To Be Continued: The Genidentity of Physical and Biological Processes.” In Individuals across the Sciences, edited by Guay, Alexandre and Pradeu, Thomas. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guenée, Bernard. 1985 [1981]. States and Rulers in Later Medieval Europe. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Guisasola, Santiago Orlando. Introduction to Complexity (Online Course). www.complexityexplorer.org/courses/144-introduction-to-complexity/segments/14475?summary#.Google Scholar
Gunitsky, Seva. 2013. “Complexity and Theories of Change in International Politics.” International Theory 5 (1):35–63.Google Scholar
Guttinger, Stephan. 2018. “A Process Ontology for Macromolecular Biology.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Alan J. 1985. Oeconomy and Discipline: Officership and Administration in the British Army, 1714–63. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano, ed. 2012a. The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2012b. “Which Geopolitics?” In The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises, edited by Guzzini, Stefano. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2013. “Power: Bourdieu’s Field Analysis of Relational Capital, Misrecognition, and Domination.” In Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, edited by Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. Routledge.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1964. Beyond the Nation State: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1991. “Policy Responses to Stratospheric Ozone Depletion.” Global Environmental Change 1 (3):224–234.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, Kahler, Miles, and Montgomery, Alexander H.. 2009. “Network Analysis for International Relations.” International Organization 63 (3):559–592.Google Scholar
Haim, Dotan A. 2016. “Alliance Networks and Trade.” Journal of Peace Research 53 (3):472–490.Google Scholar
Hajizada, Mukhtar. 2018. “Challenges and Opportunities for Establishing a Security Community in the Wider Black Sea Area.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 18 (4):529–548.Google Scholar
Haldén, Peter. 2017. “Heteronymous Politics beyond Anarchy and Hierarchy: The Multiplication of Forms of Rule 750–1300.” Journal of International Political Theory 13 (3):266–281.Google Scholar
Hall, Martin. 2004. On the Morphology of International Systems: Political Space as Structure and Process in Early Medieval Europe. CFE [Center for European Studies at Lund University] Working Paper.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2013. “Tracing the Progress of Process Tracing.” European Political Science 12 (1):20–30.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 1997. “Moral Authority as a Power Resource.” International Organization 51 (4):591–622.Google Scholar
Hallgrimsson, Benedikt and Hall, Brian K., eds. 2011. Epigenetics: Linking Genotype and Phenotype in Development and Evolution. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, Joseph Y. and Pearl, Judea. 2005. “Causes and Explanations: A Structural-Model Approach. Part II: Explanations.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):889–911.Google Scholar
Hanau Santini, Ruth and Moro, Francesco N.. 2019. “Between Hierarchy and Heterarchy: Post-Arab Uprisings, Civil–Military Relations and the Arab State.” Mediterranean Politics 24 (2):137–156.Google Scholar
Hanrieder, Tine and Zangl, Bernhard. 2015. “The Embedded State: The New Division of Labor in the Provision of Governance Functions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, edited by Leibfried, Stefan et al. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Lene. 2012. “Reconstructing Desecuritisation: The Normative-Political in the Copenhagen School and Directions for How to Apply It.” Review of International Studies 38 (3):525–546.Google Scholar
Harding, Alan. 1978. Anatomy of a Power Elite: Provincial Governors in Early Modern France. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Alan. 2002. Medieval Law and the Foundations of the State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harknett, Richard J. and Yalcin, Hasan B.. 2012. “The Struggle for Autonomy: A Realist Structural Theory of International Relations.” International Studies Review 14 (4):499–521.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom. 1986. Varieties of Realism: A Rationale for the Natural Sciences. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, Graham P. and Heathwaite, A. Louise. 2012. “Why is Achieving Good Ecological Outcomes in Rivers So Difficult?” Freshwater Biology 57:91–107.Google Scholar
Harris, Oliver J. T. 2020. “What Do We Mean by Relational Anyway?” In Archaeological Theory in Dialogue, edited by Crellin, Rachel J. et al. Routledge.Google Scholar
Harrison, Neil E., ed. 2006. Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Harrison-Buck, Eleanor and Hendon, Julia A.. 2018. Relational Identities and Other-than-Human Agency in Archaeology. University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Härter, Karl. 2013. “The Early Modern Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation (1495–1806): A Multilayered Legal System.” In Law and Empire: Ideas, Practices, Actors, edited by Duindam, Jeroen et al. Brill.Google Scholar
Hartley, Janet. 2009. “Russia as a Fiscal-Military State, 1689–1825.” In The Fiscal-Military State in Eighteenth-Century Europe: Essays in Honour of P.G.M. Dickson, edited by Storrs, Christopher. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hartwell, Leland H. et al. 1999. “From Molecular to Modular Cell Biology.” Nature 402 (6761):C47–C52.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2006. Spaces of Global Capitalism: A Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Verso.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hast, Susanna. 2016 [2014]. Spheres of Influence in International Relations: History, Theory and Politics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hatleberg, William L. and Hinman, Veronica F.. 2021. “Modularity and Hierarchy in Biological Systems: Using Gene Regulatory Networks to Understand Evolutionary Change.” In Current Topics in Developmental Biology, edited by Gilbert, Scott F.. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan and Pritchard, Alex. 2017. “Anarchy and International Relations Theory: A Reconsideration.” Journal of International Political Theory 13 (3):252–265.Google Scholar
Hayton, D. W. and Kelly, James. 2010a. “Conclusion.” In The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689–1800, edited by Hayton, D. W., Kelly, James, and Bergin, John. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hayton, D. W. and Kelly, James. 2010b. “Introduction: The Irish Parliament in European Context: A Representative Institution in a Composite State.” In The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689–1800, edited by Hayton, D. W., Kelly, James, and Bergin, John. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Headlam-Morley, J. W. 1927. “Treaties of Guarantee.” Cambridge Historical Journal 2 (2):151–170.Google Scholar
Heams, Thomas et al., eds. 2015. Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences. Springer.Google Scholar
Heatley, D. P. 1919. Diplomacy and the Study of International Relations. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hébert, Michel. 2014. Parlementer: assemblées représentatives et échange politique en Euope occidentale à la fin du Moyen Age. Editions De Boccard.Google Scholar
Hedlund, Gunnar. 1986. “The Hypermodern MNC: A Heterarchy?” Human Resource Management 25 (1):9–35.Google Scholar
Hedlund, Gunnar and Rolander, Dag. 1996. “Action in Heterarchies: New Approaches to Managing the MNC.” In Managing the Global Firm, edited by Bartlett, Christopher A. and Hedlund, Gunnar. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytic Sociology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter and Bearman, Peter, eds. 2009a. The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter and Bearman, Peter. 2009b. “What Is Analytical Sociology All About? An Introductory Essay.” In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by Hedström, Peter and Bearman, Peter. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard. 1996. “Social Mechanisms.” Acta Sociologica 39 (3):281–308.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard. 1998. “Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter and Ylikoski, Petri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 36:49–76.Google Scholar
Hehmeyer, Jenks. 2019. “Two Potential Evolutionary Origins of the Fruiting Bodies of the Dictyostelid Slime Moulds.” Biological Reviews 94 (5):1591–1604.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. and Oppenheim, Paul. 1948. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135–175.Google Scholar
Hendry, Robin Findlay. 2012. “Reduction, Emergence and Physicalism.” In Philosophy of Chemistry, edited by Woody, Andrea I., Hendry, Robin Findlay, and Needham, Paul. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Hendry, Robin Findlay and Needham, Paul. 2007. “Le Poidevin on the Reduction of Chemistry.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):339–353.Google Scholar
Henning, C. Randall and Pratt, Tyler. 2021. “Hierarchy and Differentiation in International Regime Complexes: A Theoretical Framework for Comparative Research.” www.tylerbpratt.com/s/Henning-Pratt-Hierarchy-and-Differentiation-in-Regime-Complexes-June-2021-distribution.pdf.Google Scholar
Henshall, Nicholas. 1992. The Myth of Absolutism: Change and Continuity in Early Modern European Monarchy. Longman.Google Scholar
Herde, Peter. 2000. “From Adolf of Nassau to Lewis of Bavaria, 1292–1347.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VI c. 1300–c. 1415, edited by Jones, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrera, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Technology and International Systems.” Millennium 32 (3):559–593.Google Scholar
Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, Hiedanpää, Juha, and Soini, Katriina. 2022. “The Co-Evolutionary Approach to Nature-Based Solutions: A Conceptual Framework.” Nature-Based Solutions 2:100011.Google Scholar
Herva, Vesa-Pekka et al. 2010. “Daughters of Magic: Esoteric Traditions, Relational Ontology and the Archaeology of the Post-Medieval Past.” World Archaeology 42 (4):609–621.Google Scholar
Herz, John H. 1959. International Politics in the Atomic Age. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, Markus and Mei-Ling, Catherine. 2020. “Cities Seen through a Relational Lens.” Geographische Zeitschrift 108 (2):74–98.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy, and Johnson, Burke, eds. 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hettema, Hinne. 2015. “Reduction for a Dappled World: Connecting Chemical and Physical Theories.” In Philosophy of Chemistry: Growth of a New Discipline, edited by Scerri, Eric and McIntyre, Lee. Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederick Charles. 1920. The “New World Order”: International Organization, International Law, International Cooperation. Doubleday, Page & Company.Google Scholar
Hilgarth, J. N. 1978. The Spanish Kingdoms 1250–1516: Volume II, 1410–1516, Castilian Hegemony. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hill, David Jayne. 1911. World Organization as Affected by the Nature of the Modern State. The Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Erica. 2011. “Animals as Agents: Hunting Ritual and Relational Ontologies in Prehistoric Alaska and Chukotka.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21 (3):407–426.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim and Hurtado, A. Magdalena. 1999. “The Aché of Paraguay.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hintze, Otto. 1975. The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze. Edited by Gilbert, Felix. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Robert K. and Ebert, James I.. 1989. “Modelling Kalahari Hunter-Gatherer Subsistence and Settlement Systems.” Anthropos 84 (1/3):47–62.Google Scholar
Hlavacek, Ivan. 2000. “The Luxemburgs and Rupert of the Palatine, 1347–1410.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VI c. 1300–c. 1415, edited by Jones, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. 1992. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. and Sharman, J. C.. 2005. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations 11 (1):63–98.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hoddie, Mathew and Hartzell, Caroline. 2005. “Signals of Reconciliation: Institution-Building and the Resolution of Civil Wars.” International Studies Review 7 (1):21–40.Google Scholar
Hodges, Charles. 1931. The Background of International Relations: Our World Horizons, National and International. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2000. “The Concept of Emergence in Social Sciences: Its History and Importance.” Emergence, A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management 2 (4):65–77.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Carl. 1986. The Punan: Hunters and Gatherers of Borneo. Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Philip T. 1994. “Early Modern France, 1450–1700.” In Fiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450–1789, edited by Hoffman, Philip T. and Norberg, Kathryn. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Gerhard. 1987. “Protectorates.” In Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume 10, edited by Bernhardt, Rudolf. North Holland.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1965. The State of War: Essays on the Theory and Practice of International Relations. Frederick I. Praeger.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1979. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas R. and Sander, Emmanuel. 2013. Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Carsten. 1970. The Concert of Europe: A Study in German and British International Theory, 1815–1914. Longman.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. 1992 [1975]. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. 2012. Signals and Boundaries: Building Blocks for Complex Adaptive Sysems. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. 2014. Complexity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, Bert and Wilson, E. O.. 2009. The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Holmes, Marcus. 2011. “Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed: Representations of Anarchy in International Relations Theory.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11 (2):279–308.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 2004. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, Mack P. 2005. The French Wars of Religion, 1562–1629. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holthaus, Leonie. 2020. “Who Practices Practice Theory (and How)? (Meta-)theorists, Scholar-practitioners, (Bourdieusian) Researchers, and Social Prestige in Academia.” Millennium 48 (3):323–333.Google Scholar
Hope, Jessica. 2021. “The Anti-politics of Sustainable Development: Environmental Critique from Assemblage Thinking in Bolivia.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 46 (1):208–222.Google Scholar
Hordijk, Wim, Hein, Jotun, and Steel, Mike. 2010. “Autocatalytic Sets and the Origin of Life.” Entropy 12 (7):1733–1742.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Richard S. 2004. “International Law and State Transformation in China, Siam, and the Ottoman Empire in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of World History 15 (4):445–486.Google Scholar
Horrox, Rosemary. 1998. “Yorkist and Early Tudor England.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hsu, Cho-yun. 1999. “The Spring and Autumn Period.” In The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 B.C., edited by Loewe, Michael and Shaughnessy, Edward L.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hui, Victoria Tin-bor. 2005. War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1976. “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Zoology 25 (2):174–191.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1978. “A Matter of Individuality.” Philosophy of Science 45 (3):335–360.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hull, William I. 1908. The Two Hague Conferences and Their Contributions to International Law. Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Adam R. C. 2017. “Concerts as a Mode of Ordering in World Politics.” In Great Power Multilateralism and the Prevention of War, edited by Müller, Harald and Rauch, Carsten. Routledge.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2014. “The UN Security Council and the International Rule of Law.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 7 (3):361–379.Google Scholar
Hutson, Scott R. 2010. Dwelling, Identity, and the Maya: Relational Archaeology at Chunchucmil. AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Hynek, Nik. 2018. “Theorizing International Security Regimes: A Power-Analytical Approach.” International Politics 55 (3):352–368.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Mitsuo. 1999. “The Mbuti of Northern Congo.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2002. America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ilardi, Stephen S. and Feldman, David. 2001. “On Mental Events, Disciplinary Boundaries, and Reductionism: A Reply to Plaud.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 57 (9):1103–1107.Google Scholar
Illari, Phyllis. 2019. “Mechanisms, Models and Laws in Understanding Supernovae.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 50 (1):63–84.Google Scholar
Illari, Phyllis and Russo, Federica. 2014. Causality: Philosophical Theory Meets Scientific Practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Illari, Phyllis and Williamson, Jon. 2012. “What is a Mechanism? Thinking about Mechanisms across the Sciences.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):119–135.Google Scholar
Illari, Phyllis and Williamson, Jon. 2013. “In Defence of Activities.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 44 (1):69–83.Google Scholar
Imbens, Guido W. and Rubin, Donald B.. 2015. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 1992. “Comment on ‘beyond “The Original Affluent Society”’.” Current Anthropology 33 (1):41–42.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 1999. “On the Social Relations of the Hunter-Gatherer Band.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2004. “Beyond Biology and Culture: The Meaning of Evolution in a Relational World.” Social Anthropology 12 (2):209–221.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi and Bacon, Paul. 2001. “The Study of International Relations in Japan: Towards a More International Discipline.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1 (1):1–20.Google Scholar
Irigoin, Alejandra and Grafe, Regina. 2008. “Bargaining for Absolutism: A Spanish Path to Nation-State and Empire Building.” Hispanic American Historical Review 88 (2):173–209.Google Scholar
Jablonka, Eva. 2017. “The Evolutionary Implications of Epigenetic Inheritance.” Interface Focus 7 (5):20160135.Google Scholar
Jablonka, Eva and Lamb, Marion J.. 1989. “The Inheritance of Acquired Epigenetic Variations.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 139 (1):69–83.Google Scholar
Jablonka, Eva and Lamb, Marion J.. 2014. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Rev. ed. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2006. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implication for the Study of World Politics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2017. “The Production of Facts: Ideal-Typification and the Preservation of Politics.” In Max Weber and International Relations, edited by Lebow, Richard Ned. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H.. 1999. “Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (3):291–332.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2009. “Pragmatic Faults in International-Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 53 (4):907–930.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2019. “Reclaiming the Social: Relationalism in Anglophone International Studies.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (5):582–600.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Stephen T. and Sax, Dov F.. 2010. “Balancing Biodiversity in a Changing Environment: Extinction Debt, Immigration Credit and Species Turnover.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25 (3):153–160.Google Scholar
Jackson, Van. 2014. “Power, Trust, and Network Complexity: Three Logics of Hedging in Asian Security.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 14 (3):331–356.Google Scholar
Jackson, Van. 2020. “Understanding Spheres of Influence in International Politics.” European Journal of International Security 5 (3):255–273.Google Scholar
Jacob, Frank and Visoni-Alonzo, Gilmar. 2016. The Military Revolution in Early Modern Europe: A Revision. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Bengt, Pierre, Jon, and Sundström, Göran. 2015. Governing the Embedded State: The Organizational Dimension of Governance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jago, Charles. 1981. “Habsburg Absolutism and the Cortes of Castile.” The American Historical Review 86 (2):307–326.Google Scholar
Jago, Charles. 1992. “Crown and Cortes in Early-Modern Castile.” Parliaments, Estates and Representation 12 (2):177–192.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Susanne. 1999. “International Relations and Global Environmental Change: Review of the Burgeoning Literature on the Environment.” Cooperation and Conflict 34 (2):205–236.Google Scholar
James, Patrick. 1993. “Neorealism as a Research Enterprise: Toward Elaborated Structural Realism.” International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 14 (2):123–148.Google Scholar
James, Patrick. 2002. International Relations and Scientific Progress: Structural Realism Reconsidered. Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
James, Patrick. 2017. “Clarifying Causal Mechanisms in International Relations.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, edited by William R. Thompson. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, Patrick. 2019. “Systemist International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 63 (4):781–804.Google Scholar
James, William. 1904. “The Pragmatic Method.” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1 (25):673–687.Google Scholar
James, William. 1907. “Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4 (6):141–155.Google Scholar
Jansen, Jan C. and Osterhammel, Jürgen. 2017. Decolonization. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, Stef. 2016. “For a Relational, Historical Ethnography of Hope: Indeterminacy and Determination in the Bosnian and Herzegovinian Meantime.” History and Anthropology 27 (4):447–464.Google Scholar
Jantsch, Erich. 1975. Design for Evolution: Self-Organization and Planning in the Life of Human Systems. G. Braziller.Google Scholar
Jantsch, Erich. 1980a. The Self-organizing Universe: Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of Evolution. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Jantsch, Erich. 1980b. “The Unifying Paradigm Behind Autopoiesis, Dissipative Structure, Hyper- and Ultracycles.” In Autopoiesis, Dissipative Structures, and Spontaneous Social Orders, edited by Zeleny, Milan. American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Jepperson, Ronald L. and Meyer, John W.. 2011. “Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms.” Sociological Theory 29 (1):54–73.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30 (2):167–214.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1985. “From Balance to Concert: A Study of International Security Cooperation.” World Politics 38 (1):58–79.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1992. “A Political Science Perspective on the Balance of Power and the Concert.” American Historical Review 97 (3):716–724.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1999. “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate.” International Security 24 (1):42–63.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 2010. “Thinking Systemically about Geopolitics.” Geopolitics 15 (1):165–171.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 2020. “Liberalism, the Blob, and American Foreign Policy: Evidence and Methodology.” Security Studies 29 (3):434–456.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1998. “The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure: The Case of Economic Development.” International Social Science Journal 50 (155):29–45.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 2005. “Multi-level Governance and Multi-level Metagovernance: Changes in the EU as Integral Moments in the Transformation and Reorientation of Contemporary Statehood.” In Multi-level Governance, edited by Bache, Ian and Flinders, Matthew. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Allan G. 2000. The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology. 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnson, Allen W. and Earle, Timothy. 2000. The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State. 2nd ed. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D. P. 2004. Overconfidence and War: The Havoc and Glory of Positive Illusions. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel G. B. and Ahn, Woo-kyoung. 2017. “Causal Mechanisms.” In The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning, edited by Waldman, Michael R.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 2001 [1966]. The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Clive G., Lawton, John H., and Shachak, Moshe. 1994. “Organisms as Ecosystem Engineers.” Oikos 69 (3): 373–386.Google Scholar
Jones, Clive G. et al. 2010. “A Framework for Understanding Physical Ecosystem Engineering by Organisms.” Oikos 119 (12):1862–1869.Google Scholar
Jonsson, Christer and Tallberg, Jonas. 1998. “Compliance and Post-Agreement Bargaining.” European Journal of International Relations 4 (4):371–408.Google Scholar
Jooss, Christian. 2020. Self-Organization of Matter: A Dialectical Approach to Evolution of Matter in the Microcosm and Macrocosmos. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan. 2018. “Beyond Relationalism in Peacebuilding.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12 (3):425–434.Google Scholar
Jung, Ludwig. 2021. The Political Economy of International Prohibition Regimes: A Transaction Cost Perspective on Relational Contracting between States. Nomos Verlag.Google Scholar
Kaare, Bwire and Woodburn, James. 1999. “The Hadza of Tanzania.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kadushin, Charles. 2012. Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Korina. 1997/98. “The Myth of the European Concert: The Realist-Institutionalist Debate and Great Power Behavior in the Eastern Question, 1821–1841.” Security Studies 7 (2):1–57.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles and Lake, David A.. 2004. “Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (3):409–414.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Marie I. 2018. “Individuating Part-Whole Relations in the Biological World.” In Individuation, Process, and Scientific Practices, edited by Bueno, Otávio, Chen, Ruey-Lin, and Fagan, Melinda Bonnie. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kamen, Henry. 1968. “The Economic and Social Consequences of the Thirty Years’ War.” Past & Present 39:44–61.Google Scholar
Kaminsky, Howard. 2000. “The Great Schism.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VI c. 1300–c. 1415, edited by Jones, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2020. “International Order in Historical East Asia: Tribute and Hierarchy beyond Sinocentrism and Eurocentrism.” International Organization 74 (1):65–93.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 2000. “The Darker Side of the ‘Original Affluent Society’.” Journal of Anthropological Research 56 (3):301–324.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morton A. 1957. System and Process in International Politics. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kármán, Gabor and Kunčević, Lovro, eds. 2013. The European Tributary States of the Ottoman Empire in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Brill.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in International Politics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D., eds. 1999a. Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D.. 1999b. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics.” In Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A.. 2018. Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. 1986. “Autocatalytic Sets of Proteins.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 119 (1):1–24.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. 1993. The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. 1995. At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart, Little, Richard, and Wohlforth, William, eds. 2007. The Balance of Power in World History. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kauppi, Niilo and Rask Madsen, Mikael, eds. 2013. Transnational Power Elites: The New Professionals of Governance, Law and Security. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kavalski, Emilian. 2007. “The Fifth Debate and the Emergence of Complex International Relations Theory: Notes on the Application of Complexity Theory to the Study of International Life.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20 (3):435–454.Google Scholar
Kavalski, Emilian. 2016. “Relationality and Its Chinese Characteristics.” China Quarterly 226:551–559.Google Scholar
Kay, Adrian and Baker, Phillip. 2015. “What Can Causal Process Tracing Offer to Policy Studies? A Review of the Literature.” Policy Studies Journal 43 (1):1–21.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, K.. 1999. “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics.” International Social Science Journal 51 (159):89–101.Google Scholar
Kedar, Asaf. 2007. “Ideal Types as Hermeneutic Concepts.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (3):318–345.Google Scholar
Keeley, Lawrence H. 1997. War before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2005. International Political Thought: An Historical Introduction. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2014. “The Standard of ‘Civilisation,’ the Expansion Thesis and the 19th-Century International Social Space.” Millennium 42 (3):651–673.Google Scholar
Kegley, Charles W. and Raymond, Gregory A.. 2011. The Global Future: A Brief Introduction to World Politics. 4th ed. Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Kelly, Phil. 2020. “The Present Transition in Global Politics.” World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues 24 (1):10–23.Google Scholar
Kelly, Raymond C. 2000. Warless Societies and the Origin of War. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Robert E. 2012. “A ‘Confucian Long Peace’ in pre-Western East Asia?” European Journal of International Relations 18 (3):407–430.Google Scholar
Kelly, Robert L. 1995. The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Dane Keither. 2016. Decolonization: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Denis and Beaton, Brian. 2016. “Two Steps Forward? Assessing Latin American Regionalism through CELAC.” Latin American Policy 7 (1):52–79.Google Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O. 1980. Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986b. “Reciprocity in International Relations.” International Organization 40 (1):1–27.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986c. “Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond.” In Neo-Realism and Its Critics, edited by Keohane, Robert O.. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1993. “Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War.” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Baldwin, David A.. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2001. “Governance in a Partially Globalized World.” American Political Science Review 95 (1):1–13.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2012. “Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism.” International Relations 26 (2):125–138.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., eds. 1972. Transnational Relations and World Politics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S.. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S.. 1987. “Power and Interdependence Revisited.” International Organization 41 (4):725–753.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Victor, David G.. 2011. “The Regime Complex for Climate Change.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (1):7–23.Google Scholar
Kerin, Roger A., Rajan Varadarajan, P., and Peterson, Robert A.. 1992. “First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions.” Journal of Marketing 56 (4):33–52.Google Scholar
Kerr, Philip Henry (Marquis of Lothian). 1935. Pacifism Is Not Enough, nor Patriotism Either. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, Philip Henry (Marquis of Lothian). 1941. The American Speeches of Lord Lothian, July 1939 to December 1940. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. 2017. “Microfoundations in International Relations.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 34 (1):81–97.Google Scholar
Kettering, Sharon. 1986a. “Patronage and Politics during the Fronde.” French Historical Studies 14 (3):409–441.Google Scholar
Kettering, Sharon. 1986b. Patrons, Brokers, and Clients in Seventeenth-Century France. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kettering, Sharon. 1988. “The Historical Development of Political Clientelism.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 (3):419–447.Google Scholar
Keuschnigg, Marc, Lovsjö, Niclas, and Hedström, Peter. 2018. “Analytical Sociology and Computational Social Science.” Journal of Computational Social Science 1 (1):3–14.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1920. The Economic Consequences of the Peace. Harcourt, Brace and Howe.Google Scholar
Kiel, L. Douglas and Elliott, Euel W.. 1996. Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences: Foundations and Applications. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. 2008. “Reduction and Reductive Explanation: Is One Possible without the Other?” In Being Reduced: New Essays on Reduction, Explanation, and Causation, edited by Hohwy, Jakob and Kallestrup, Jesper. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Moonhawk and Wolford, Scott. 2014. “Choosing Anarchy: Institutional Alternatives and the Global Order.” International Theory 6 (1):28–67.Google Scholar
Kim, Rakhyun E. 2019. “Understanding Institutional Complexity through Networks.” In Global Challenges, Governance, and Complexity: Applications and Frontiers, edited by Galaz, Victor. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Kim, Rakhyun E. 2020. “Is Global Governance Fragmented, Polycentric, or Complex? The State of the Art of the Network Approach.” International Studies Review 22 (4):903–931.Google Scholar
Kim, Rakhyun E. and Morin, Jean-Frédéric. 2021. “Massive Institutional Structures in Global Governance.” Global Environmental Politics 21 (3):1–23.Google Scholar
Kincaid, Harold. 2012. “Mechanisms, Causal Modeling, and the Limitations of Traditional Multiple Regression.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science, edited by Kincaid, Harold. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1984. A Financial History of Western Europe. George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kingra, Mahinder S. 1993. “The Trace Italienne and the Military Revolution during the Eighty Years War, 1567–1648.” The Journal of Military History 57 (3):431.Google Scholar
Kirk, Grayson L. 1947. The Study of International Relations in American Colleges and Universities. Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Kishigami, Nobuhiro. 2004. “A New Typology of Food-Sharing Practices among Hunter-Gatherers, with a Special Focus on Inuit Examples.” Journal of Anthropological Research 60 (3):341–358.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A. 1957. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812–22. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kistler, Max. 2009. “Mechanisms and Downward Causation.” Philosophical Psychology 22 (5):595–609.Google Scholar
Kitano, Hiroaki. 2002b. “Systems Biology: A Brief Overview.” Science 295 (5560):1662–1664.Google Scholar
Kitchen, Nicholas. 2010. “Systemic Pressures and Domestic Ideas: A Neoclassical Realist Model of Grand Strategy Formation.” Review of International Studies 36 (1):117.Google Scholar
Kivinen, Osmo and Piiroinen, Tero. 2006. “Toward Pragmatist Methodological Relationalism.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3):303–329.Google Scholar
Klassen, John. 1998. “Hus, the Hussites and Bohemia.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klunk, Jennifer et al. 2022. “Evolution of Immune Genes Is Associated with the Black Death.” Nature 611 (7935):312–319.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knox, MacGregor and Murray, Williamson, eds. 2001. The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300–2050. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knudsen, Tonny Brems and Navari, Cornelia. 2019. International Organization in the Anarchical Society: The Institutional Structure of World Order. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knuppe, Austin J. 2014. “Handcuffing the Hegemon: The Paradox of State Power under Unipolarity.” International Politics Reviews 2 (2):61–71.Google Scholar
Kobrin, Stephen. 1999. “Neomedievalism and the Postmodern Digital World Economy.” In Globalization and Governance, edited by Hart, Jeffrey A. and Prakash, Aseem. Routledge.Google Scholar
Koebner, Richard and Schmidt, Helmut Dan. 1965. Imperialism: The Story and Significance of a Political Word, 1840–1960. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, H. G. 1978. “Monarchies and Parliaments in Early Modern Europe: Dominium Regale or Dominium Politicum et Regale?” Theory and Society 5 (2):191–217.Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, H. G. 1986. Politicians and Virtuosi: Essays in Early Modern History. The Hambeldon Press.Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, H. G. 1995. “Parliaments and Estates.” In The Origins of Modern Freedom in the West, edited by Davis, Richard W.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kondepudi, Dilip and Prigogine, Ilya. 2015. Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures. 2nd ed. Wiley.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization 55 (4):761–799.Google Scholar
Koshland, Daniel E. Jr. 2002. “The Seven Pillars of Life.” Science 295 (5563):2215–2216.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2002. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Policy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization 36 (2):185–206.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1992. “Realism, Imperialism, and Democracy: A Response to Gilbert.” Political Theory 20 (1):38–52.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2007a. “Evidence, Inference, and Truth as Problems of Theory Building in the Social Sciences.” In Theory and Evidence in Comparative Politics and International Relations, edited by Lebow, Richard Ned and Lichbach, Mark Irving. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2007b. “Of False Promises and Good Bets: A Pragmatic Approach to Theory Building.” Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (1):1–15.Google Scholar
Kratz, Corinne A. 1999. “The Okiek of Kenya.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krebs, Ronald R. 1999. “Perverse Institutionalism: NATO and the Greco-Turkish Conflict.” International Organization 53 (2):343–377.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. and Parsons, Talcott. 1958. “The Concepts of Culture and of Social System.” American Sociological Review 23 (5):582–583.Google Scholar
Krohs, U. et al., eds. 2009. Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuorikoski, Jaakko. 2009. “Two Concepts of Mechanism: Componential Causal System and Abstract Form of Interaction.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):143–160.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. and Kupchan, Clifford. 1991. “Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe.” International Security 16 (1):114–161.Google Scholar
Kurki, Milja. 2008. Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kurki, Milja. 2020. International Relations in a Relational Universe. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kurki, Milja. 2022. “Relational Revolution and Relationality in IR: New Conversations.” Review of International Studies 48 (5):821–836.Google Scholar
Kustermans, Jorg. 2016. “Parsing the Practice Turn: Practice, Practical Knowledge, Practices.” Millennium – Journal of International Studies 44 (2):175–196.Google Scholar
Kutschera, Ulrich. 2018. “Systems Biology of Eukaryotic Superorganisms and the Holobiont Concept.” Theory in Biosciences 137 (2):117–131.Google Scholar
Kwan, Alan Shiu Cheung. 2016. “Hierarchy, Status and International Society: China and the Steppe Nomads.” European Journal of International Relations 22 (2):362–383.Google Scholar
Kwass, Michael. 2000. Privilege and the Politics of Taxation in Eighteenth-Century France: Liberté, Franternité, Fiscalité. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, Seok-Woo et al. 2020. “Network Brokerage: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda.” Journal of Management 46 (6):1092–1120.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew. 2018. “Game Theory and the Future of International Security.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Security, edited by Alexandra Gheciu and William C. Wohlforth. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James and Wiesner, Karoline. 2020. What Is a Complex System? Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James, Lambert, James, and Wiesner, Karoline. 2013. “What Is a Complex System?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3:33–67.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Lakatos, Imré and Musgrave, Alan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imré. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2003a. “International Relations Theory and Internal Conflict: Insights from the Interstices.” International Studies Review 5 (4):81–90.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2003b. “The New Sovereignty in International Relations.” International Studies Review 5 (3):303–323.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laland, Kevin N. et al. 2015. “The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282 (1813):20151019.Google Scholar
Landini, Tatiana Savpoia and Dépelteau, François. 2014. Norbert Elias and Empirical Research. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold J. 1921. The Foundations of Sovereignty and Other Essays. Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. 1933. The Function of Law in the International Community. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. J. 1898 [1895]. The Principles of International Law. 2nd ed. D. C. Heath & Co.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. J. 1919. The Society of Nations: Its Past, Present, and Possible Future. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin. 2005. “Missing Elements and Missing Premises: A Combinatorial Argument for the Ontological Reduction of Chemistry.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):117–134.Google Scholar
Leacock, Eleanor and Lee, Richard. 1982. “Introduction.” In Politics and History in Band Societies, edited by Leacock, Eleanor and Lee, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Learoyd, Arthur. 2018. “Configurations of Semi-sovereignty in the Long Nineteenth Century.” In De-centering State Making: Comparative and International Perspectives, edited by Bartelson, Jens, Hall, Martin, and Teorell, Jan. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lechner, Silviya. 2017. “Why Anarchy Still Matters for International Relations: On Theories and Things.” Journal of International Political Theory 13 (3):341–359.Google Scholar
Lechner, Silviya and Frost, Mervyn. 2018. Practice Theory and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ledón-Rettig, Cristina and Ragsdale, Eric J.. 2021. “Physiological Mechanisms and the Evolution of Plasticity.” In Phenotypic Plasticity & Evolution: Causes, Consequences, Controversies, edited by Pfennig, David W.. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Ji-young. 2016. China’s Hegemony: Four Hundred Years of East Asian Domination. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard B. 1968. “What Hunters Do for a Living, or, How to Make Out on Scarce Resources.” In Man the Hunter, edited by Lee, Richard B. and DeVore, Irven. Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard B. 1979. The !Kung San: Men, Women and Work in a Foraging Society. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard B. 1982. “Politics, Sexual and Non-sexual, in an Egalitarian Society.” In Politics and History in Band Societies, edited by Leacock, Eleanor and Lee, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard B. 1986. “!Kung Kin Terms, the Name Relationship and the Process of Discovery.” In The Past and Future of !Kung Ethnography: Critical Reflections and Symbolic Perspectives. Essays in Honour of Lorna Marshall, edited by Biesele, Megan. Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. 1999. “Foragers and Others.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard B. and DeVore, Irven. 1968. “Problems in the Study of Hunters and Gatherers.” In Man the Hunter, edited by Lee, Richard B. and DeVore, Irven. Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lee, Yong Wook. 2019. “Relational Ontology and the Politics of Boundary-Making: East Asian Financial Regionalism.” Politics 39 (1):18–34.Google Scholar
Lees, Nicholas. 2020. “Conflict and the Separateness of Peoples: Investigating the Relationship between Multiplicity, Inequality and War.” Globalizations 17 (3):404–418.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine and Hookway, Christopher. 2021. “Pragmatism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism/.Google Scholar
Legg, Stephen. 2009. “Of Scales, Networks and Assemblages: The League of Nations Apparatus and the Scalar Sovereignty of the Government of India.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34 (2):234–53.Google Scholar
Lentner, Howard H. 2006. “Hegemony and Power in International Relations.” In Hegemony and Power: Consensus and Coercion in Contemporary Politics, edited by Haugaard, Mark and Lentner, Howard H.. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Leonardi, Paul M., Bailey, Diane E., and Pierce, Casey S.. 2019. “The Coevolution of Objects and Boundaries over Time: Materiality, Affordances, and Boundary Salience.” Information Systems Research 30 (2):665–686.Google Scholar
Levin, Janet. 2018. “Functionalism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/functionalism/.Google Scholar
Levin, Simon A. 1992. “The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology.” Ecology 73 (6):1943–1967.Google Scholar
Levin, Simon A. 2005. “Self-Organization and the Emergence of Complexity in Ecological Systems.” BioScience 55 (12):1075–1079.Google Scholar
Levine, Michael and Davidson, Eric H.. 2006. “Gene Regulatory Networks for Development.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (14):4936–4942.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. and Thompson, William R.. 2013. “The Decline of War? Multiple Trajectories and Diverging Trends.” International Studies Review 15 (3):411–419.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. 1970. “The Units of Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:1–18.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Bruce S. and Vrba, Elisabeth S.. 1995. “Hierarchy Theory, Selection, and Sorting.” BioScience 45 (6):394–399.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Marvin B. and Montgomery, David B.. 1988. “First‐Mover Advantages.” Strategic Management Journal 9 (S1):41–58.Google Scholar
Light, Ryan and Moody, James, eds. 2021. The Oxford Handbook of Social Networks. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lim, Alwyn. 2020. “Global Fields, Institutional Emergence, and the Regulation of Transnational Corporations.” Social Forces 99 (3):1060–1085.Google Scholar
Lind, Gunner. 1996. “Great Friends and Small Friends: Clientelism and the Power Elite.” In Power Elites and State Building, edited by Reinhard, Wolfgang. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lind, Jennifer M. 2004. “Pacifism or Passing the Buck? Testing Theories of Japanese Security Policy.” International Security 29 (1):92–121.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew. 2011. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew and Mennell, Stephen. 2010. “Norbert Elias, The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations – An Overview and Assessment.” History and Theory 49 (3):384–411.Google Scholar
Lipp, Charles T. 2011. Noble Strategies in an Early Modern Small State: The Mahuet of Lorraine. University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1943. U.S. Foreign Policy: Shield of the Republic. Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Lipschutz, Ronnie D. 1998. “Bioregionalism, Civil Society, and Global Environmental Governance.” In Bioregionalism, edited by McGinnis, Michael Vincent. Routledge.Google Scholar
Little, Daniel. 2011. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Realm.” In Causality in the Sciences, edited by Illari, Phyllis McKay, Russo, Federica, and Williamson, Jon. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Little, Richard. 2007. The Balance of Power in International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Xin. 2016. “Anarchy in the East: Eurocentrism, China-Centred Geopolitics and Uneven and Combined Development.” International Politics 53 (5):574–595.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Gould, Stephen J.. 1993. “Species Selection on Variability.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90 (2):595–599.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. and Gould, Stephen Jay. 2017. “Exaptation Revisited: Changes Imposed by Evolutionary Psychologists and Behavioral Biologists.” Biological Theory 12 (1):50–65.Google Scholar
Lombrozo, Tania and Carey, Susan. 2006. “Functional Explanation and the Function of Explanation.” Cognition 99 (2):167–204.Google Scholar
Long, David. 1995. “Conclusion: Inter-War Idealism, Liberal Internationalism, and Contemporary International Theory.” In Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed, edited by Long, David and Wilson, Peter. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Long, David and Wilson, Peter, eds. 1995. Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lopez, Anthony C. and Johnson, Dominic. 2020. “The Determinants of War in International Relations.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 178:983–997.Google Scholar
López-Jiménez, Ana Teresa et al. 2019. “The Developmental Cycle of Dictyostelium discoideum Ensures Curing of a Mycobacterial Infection at Both Cell-Autonomous Level and by Collaborative Exclusion.” bioRxiv:586263. 10.1101/586263Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward N. 1963. “Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow.” Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 20 (2):130–141.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward N. 1972. “Predictability: Does the Flap of a Butterfly’s Wing in Brazil Set Off a Tornado in Texas?” American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, December 29.Google Scholar
Lottin, Alain. 1991. “Louis XIV and Flanders.” In Conquest and Coalescence: The Shaping of the State in Early Modern Europe, edited by Greengrass, Mark. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Loudon, Claire Marie et al. 2016. “Experimental Evidence that Evolution by Niche Construction Affects Dissipative Ecosystem Dynamics.” Evolutionary Ecology 30 (2):221–234.Google Scholar
Love, Alan. 2020. “Developmental Biology.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/biology-developmental/.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1936. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lovett, A. W. 1977. Philip II and MateoVázquez de Leca: The Government of Spain (1572–1592). Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Lowenheim, Oded. 2007. Predators and Parasites: Persistent Agents of Transnational Harm and Great Power Authority. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1990a. “The Autopoiesis of Social Systems.” In Essays on Self-Reference. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1990b. “The Paradox of System Differentiation and the Evolution of Society.” In Differentiation Theory and Social Change: Comparative and Historical Perspectives, edited by Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Colomy, Paul. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 2002. “The Cognitive Program of Constructivism and the Reality that Remains Unknown.” In Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity, edited by Rasch, William. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luisi, Pier Luigi. 2016. The Emergence of Life: From Chemical Origins to Synthetic Biology. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lunau, Klaus. 2004. “Adaptive Radiation and Coevolution: Pollination Biology Case Studies.” Organisms Diversity & Evolution 4 (3):207–224.Google Scholar
Lye, Tuck-Po. 2004. Changing Pathways: Forest Degradation and the Batek of Pahang, Malaysia. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lynn, John A. 1997. Giant of the Grand Siècle: The French Army 1610–1715. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, John A. 2001. “Forging the Western Army in Seventeenth-Century France.” In The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300–2050, edited by Knox, MacGregor and Murray, Williamson. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynn-Jones, Sean M. and Miller, Steven E.. 1995. “Preface.” In The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security, edited by Brown, Michael E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Timothy D. 2016. “Scientific Realism.” In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, edited by Humphreys, Paul. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maccoby, Malcolm. 1991. “Move from Hierarchy to Heterarchy.” Research Technology Management 34 (5):46–47.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Paul K. 2014. Networks of Domination: The Social Foundations of Peripheral Conquest in International Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Paul K. 2018. “Embedded Authority: A Relational Networks Approach to Hierarchy in World Politics.” Review of International Studies 44 (1):128–150.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter. 2004. “Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):27–39.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F.. 2000. “Thinking about Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1–25.Google Scholar
Macinnes, Allan I. 2003. “The Multiple Kingdoms of Britain and Ireland: The ‘British Problem’.” In A Companion to Stuart Britain, edited by Coward, Barry. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Macinnes, Allan I., German, Kieran, and Graham, Lesley, eds. 2016 [2014]. Living with Jacobitism, 1690–1788: The Three Kingdoms and Beyond. Routledge.Google Scholar
MacKay, Angus. 1998. “Castile and Navarre.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacKay, Joseph. 2013. “International Politics in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Central Asia: Beyond Anarchy in International Relations Theory.” Central Asian Survey 32 (2):210–224.Google Scholar
MacKay, Joseph. 2014. “Rethinking the IR Theory of Empire in Late Imperial China.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 15 (1):53–79.Google Scholar
MacKay, Ruth. 1999. The Limits of Royal Authority: Resistance and Obedience in Seventeenth-Century Castile. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Kenneth D. 2004. “The Process Approach to Multi-Level Organizational Behavior.” In Multi-Level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Processes, edited by Yammarino, Francis J. and Danserau, Fred. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mackinder, H. J. 1919. Democratic Ideals and Reality: A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction. Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Mahan, A. T. 1912. Armaments and Arbitration or the Place of Force in the International Relations of States. Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2001. “Review Essay: Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method.” Sociological Forum 16 (3):575–593.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2012. “The Logic of Process-Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methods & Research 41 (4):570–597.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2016. “Mechanisms, Bayesianism, and Process Tracing.” New Political Economy 21 (5):493–499.Google Scholar
Major, J. Russell. 1962. “The French Renaissance Monarchy as Seen through the Estates General.” Studies in the Renaissance 9:113–125.Google Scholar
Major, J. Russell. 1964. “The Crown and the Aristocracy in Renaissance France.” The American Historical Review 69 (3):631–645.Google Scholar
Major, J. Russell. 1980. Representative Government in Early Modern France. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Major, J. Russell. 1986. “The Revolt of 1620: A Study of Ties of Fidelity.” French Historical Studies 14 (3):391–408.Google Scholar
Major, J. Russell. 1994. From Renaissance Monarchy to Absolute Monarchy. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Malanima, Paolo. 2009. Pre-modern European Economy: One Thousand Years (10th–19th Centuries). Brill.Google Scholar
Mallett, Michael and Shaw, Christine. 2014 [2012]. The Italian Wars 1494–1559: War, State and Society in Early Modern Europe. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mallon, Ron. 2007. “A Field Guide to Social Construction.” Philosophy Compass 2 (1):93–108.Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff. 2012. “Putting Space in Place: Philosophical Topography and Relational Geography.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30 (2):226–242.Google Scholar
Mancilla Garcia, Maria, Hertz, Tilman, and Schlüter, Maja. 2020. “Towards a Process Epistemology for the Analysis of Social-Ecological System.” Environmental Values 29 (2):221–239.Google Scholar
Mandel, Robert. 2013. Global Security Upheaval: Armed Nonstate Groups Usurping State Stability Functions. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power, Volume I: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, C. A. W. 1932. The Policies of the British Dominions in the League of Nations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manning, C. A. W., ed. 1937. Peaceful Change: An International Problem. The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Mansbach, Richard W. 2004. “The Meaning of 11 September and the Emerging Postinternational World.” In 11 September and Its Aftermath: The Geopolitics of Terror, edited by Brunn, Stanley D.. Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. 1993. “Concentration, Polarity, and the Distribution of Power.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (1):105–128.Google Scholar
Manzo, Gianluca, ed. 2014. Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mao, Shuhua et al. 2020. “Grey–Lotka–Volterra Model for the Competition and Cooperation between Third-Party Online Payment Systems and Online Banking in China.” Applied Soft Computing 95:106501.Google Scholar
Margulis, Lynn. 1991. “Symbiogenesis and Symbiontism.” In Symbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation: Speciation and Morphogenesis, edited by Margulis, Lynn and Fester, René. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maroney, Owen. 2009. “Information Processing and Thermodynamic Equillibrium.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/information-entropy/.Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter. 2009. The Reformation: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter, ed. 2015. The Oxford Illustrated History of the Reformation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martens, Georg Friedrich von. 1986 [1795]. Summary of the Law of Nations, Founded on the Treaties and Customs of the Modern Nations of Europe. Fred B. Rothman & Co. [Thomas Bradford].Google Scholar
Martin, John Levi. 2003. “What Is Field Theory?” American Journal of Sociology 109 (1):1–49.Google Scholar
Massimi, Michela and McCoy, Casey, eds. 2020. Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects. Routledge.Google Scholar
Masterman, Margaret. 1970. “The Nature of a Paradigm.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Lakatos, Imré and Musgrave, Alan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. 1964. “World Politics as a Primitive Political System.” World Politics 16 (4):595–619.Google Scholar
Mastrobuono-Battisti, Alessandra et al. 2019. “Star Formation at the Galactic Centre: Coevolution of Multiple Young Stellar Discs.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (4):5820–5831.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto R. and Varela, Francisco J.. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John and Szathmáry, Eörs. 1995. The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John and Szathmáry, Eörs. 1999. The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John et al. 1985. “Developmental Constraints and Evolution.” Quarterly Review of Biology 60 (3):265–287.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William B.. 1998 [1980]. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2008. “Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention.” Qualitative Sociology 31 (4):307–331.Google Scholar
McCants, Ann. 2015. “Historical Demography.” In The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern European History, 1350–1750. Volume I: Peoples and Places, edited by Scott, Hamish. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McClamrock, Ron. 1991. “Marr’s Three Levels: A Re-Evaluation.” Minds and Machines 1 (2):185–196.Google Scholar
McClamrock, Ron. 2005. “Modularity.” In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences, edited by Nadel, Lynn. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles A. 1966. Theory and the International System. The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
McCluskey, Phil. 2013. Absolute Monarchy on the Frontiers: Louis XIV’s Military Occupations of Lorraine and Savoy. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
McConaughey, Meghan, Musgrave, Paul, and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2018. “Beyond Anarchy: Logics of Political Organization, Hierarchy, and International Structure.” International Theory 10 (2):181–218.Google Scholar
McCormack, Daniel. 2019. Great Powers and International Hierarchy. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McCourt, David M. 2014. Britain and World Power since 1945: Constructing a Nation’s Role in International Politics. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McCourt, David M. 2016. “Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (3):475–485.Google Scholar
McDonald, Matt. 2008. “Securitization and the Construction of Security.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (4):563–587.Google Scholar
McIntyre, David P. and Srinivasan, Arati. 2017. “Networks, Platforms, and Strategy: Emerging Views and Next Steps.” Strategic Management Journal 38 (1):141–160.Google Scholar
McKitterick, Rosamond. 1999. “The Church.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume 3, c. 900–1024, edited by Reuter, Timothy. Cambridge Univrsity Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. 2001. What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNair, Arnold D. 1927. “Equality in International Law.” Michigan Law Review 26 (2):131–152.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2006. “Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer (Part II).” International Relations 20 (2):231–243.Google Scholar
Medeiros, Lucas P. et al. 2018. “The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution in Mutualistic Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (47):12017–12022.Google Scholar
Meibauer, Gustav et al. 2021. “Rethinking Neoclassical Realism at Theory’s End.” International Studies Review 23 (1):268–295.Google Scholar
Meijer, Hugo and Jensen, Benjamin. 2018. “The Strategist’s Dilemma: Global Dynamic Density and the Making of US ‘China Policy’.” European Journal of International Security 3 (2):211–234.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Claude. 1981 [1975]. Maidens, Meals and Money. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meincke, Anne Sophie. 2018. “Persons as Biological Processes: A Bio-Processual Way Out of the Personal Identity Dilemma.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meincke, Anne Sophie. 2019a. “Autopoiesis, Biological Autonomy and the Process View of Life.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9:1–16.Google Scholar
Meincke, Anne Sophie. 2019b. “Human Persons: A Process View.” In Was sind und wie existieren Personen?, edited by Noller, Jörg. Mentis.Google Scholar
Meincke, Anne Sophie and Dupré, John, eds. 2021. Biological Identity: Perspectives from Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Biology. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mennell, Stephen. 1998. Norbert Elias: An Introduction. University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
Menzies, Peter and Beebee, Helen. 2019. “Counterfactual Theories of Causation.” In The Stanford Encylcopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/causation-counterfactual/.Google Scholar
Mettam, Roger. 2007. “The French Nobility, 1610–1715.” In The European Nobilities in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Volume I: Western and Southern Europe, 2nd ed., edited by Scott, H. M.. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meyer, Andreas. 2007. “Papal Monarchy.” In A Companion to the Medieval World, edited by Lansing, Carol and English, Edward D.. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, and Thomas, George M.. 1987. “Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account.” In Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and Individual, edited by Thomas, George M. et al. Sage.Google Scholar
Michael, Donald N. 1983. “Neither Hierarchy nor Anarchy: Notes for Norms on Governance in a Systemic World.” In Rethinking Liberalism, edited by Anderson, Walter Truett. Avon Books.Google Scholar
Middlebush, Frederick A. and Hill, Chesney. 1940. Elements of International Relations. McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel S. 1997. “Studying the State.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, Structure, edited by Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Militello, Guglielmo, Bich, Leonardo, and Moreno, Alvaro. 2021. “Functional Integration and Individuality in Prokaryotic Collective Organisations.” Acta Biotheoretica 69 (3):391–415.Google Scholar
Miller, Benjamin. 2004. “The International System and Regional Balance in the Middle East.” In Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, edited by Paul, T. V., Wirtz, James J., and Fortman, Michel. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, John H. 2015. A Crude Look at the Whole: The Science of Complex Systems in Business, Life, and Society. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Miller, John H. and Page, Scott E.. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Maureen C. 2005. Power and the Holy in the Age of the Investiture Conflict: A Brief History with Documents. Bedford/St. Martins.Google Scholar
Miller, Stephen J. 2010. “The Estates of Languedoc in Eighteenth-Century France: Administrative Expansion and Feudal Revitalisation.” In The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Irealand and Europe, 1689–1800, edited by Hayton, D. W., Kelly, James, and Bergin, John. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1998. “Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International, American, and Comparative Politics.” International Organization 52 (4):759–786.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. and Moravcsik, Andrew, eds. 2009. Power, Interdpendence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann. 2011. “Relational Sociology, Culture, and Agency.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by Scott, John and Carrington, Peter J.. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra D. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra D. 2012. “Emergence: Logical, Functional and Dynamical.” Synthese 185 (2):171–186.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin and Hensel, Paul R.. 2007. “International Institutions and Compliance with Agreements.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4):721–737.Google Scholar
Mitrany, David. 1933. The Progress of International Government. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mitrany, David. 1944. A Working Peace System: An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization. Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2013. Power in Concert: The Nineteenth-Century Origins of Global Governance. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miura, Satoshi. 2003. “The Heterarchical Society: Networks and Authorities in World Politics Institutionalization of International Relations.” International Relations 2003 (132):58–76.Google Scholar
Miura, Satoshi. 2004. “Heterarchy in World Politics: Circularity, Distributed Authority, and Networks.” Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, Fathali M., Walker, Benjamin J., and Harré, Rom. 2003. “Cultural Distance, Levels of Abstraction, and the Advantages of Mixed Methods.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, edited by Tashakkori, Abbas and Teddlie, Charles. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Moisio, Sami and Paasi, Anssi. 2013. “Beyond State-Centricity: Geopolitics of Changing State Spaces.” Geopolitics 18 (2):255–266.Google Scholar
Molter, Dan. 2017. “On Mushroom Individuality.” Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1117–1127.Google Scholar
Monson, Andrew. 2020. “Alexander’s Tributary Empire.” In The Legitimation of Conquest: Monarchical Representation and the Art of Government in the Empire of Alexander the Great, edited by Trampedach, Kai and Meeus, Alexander. Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Alexander H. 2016. “Centrality in Transnational Governance: How Networks of International Institutions Shape Power Processes.” In The New Power Politics: Networks and Transnational Security Governance, edited by Avant, Deborah and Westerwinter, Oliver. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monton, Bradley and Molder, Chad. 2021. “Constructive Empiricism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/constructive-empiricism/.Google Scholar
Moody, Theodore William, Martin, Francis X., and Jon Byrne, Frances. 1991 [1976]. Early Modern Ireland, 1534–1691. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Moore, John Bassett. 1898. History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to Which the United States Has Been a Party. Vol. I-VI. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Moore, R. I. 2007 [1987]. Formation of a Persecuting Society: Authority and Deviance in Western Europe 950–1250. 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Moote, A. Lloyd. 1962. “The French Crown versus Its Judicial and Financial Officials, 1615–1683.” Journal of Modern History 34 (2):146–160.Google Scholar
Moote, A. Lloyd. 1971. The Revolt of the Judges: The Parlement of Paris and the Fronde, 1643–1652. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alvaro and Mossio, Matteo. 2015. Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Inquiry. Springer.Google Scholar
Morgan, Stephen L. and Winship, Christopher. 2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Stephen L. and Winship, Christopher. 2012. “Bringing Context and Variability Back into Causal Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by Kincaid, Harold. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Stephen L. and Winship, Christopher. 2015. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1946. Scientific Man versus Power Politics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1951. In Defense of the National Interest: A Critical Examination of American Foreign Policy. Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1962. Politics in the Twentieth Century. Volume I: The Decline of Democratic Politics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morran, Levi T. et al. 2011. “Running with the Red Queen: Host-Parasite Coevolution Selects for Biparental Sex.” Science 333 (6039):216–218.Google Scholar
Morris, Christopher W. 2004. “The Modern State.” In Handbook of Political Theory, edited by Kukathas, Chandran and Gaus, Gerald F.. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Mouritzen, Hans. 1980. “Selecting Explanatory Level in International Politics: Evaluating a Set of Criteria.” Cooperation and Conflict 15 (3):169–182.Google Scholar
Mousnier, R[oland]. 1970. “French Institutions and Society 1610–61.” In The New Cambridge Modern History, IV: The Decline of Spain and the Thirty Years War 1609–48/59, edited by Cooper, J. P.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mousnier, Roland. 1971 [1946]. La Venalité des offices sous Henri IV et Louis XIII. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Mousnier, Roland. 1979 [1974]. The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy 1598–1789. Volume I: Society and the State. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mousnier, Roland. 1979 [1980]. The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy 1598–1789. Volume II: The Organs of State and Society. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mowat, R. B. 1929. The European States System: A Study in International Relations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Milton, Schmidt, Andreas, and Kuerbis, Brenden. 2013. “Internet Security and Networked Governance in International Relations.” International Studies Review 15 (1):86–104.Google Scholar
Mulich, Jeppe. 2020. In a Sea of Empires: Networks and Crossings in the Revolutionary Caribbean. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Gerd B. 2007. “Evo–Devo: Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis.” Nature Reviews Genetics 8 (12):943–949.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Jon. 2005. Post-Structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 2016. “Realist Multilateralism.” In Seeking Order in Anarchy: Multilateralism as State Strategy, edited by Murray, Robert W.. University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Paul and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2018. “Defending Hierarchy from the Moon to the Indian Ocean: Symbolic Capital and Political Dominance in Early Modern China and the Cold War.” International Organization 72 (3):591–626.Google Scholar
Nadelman, Ethan A. 1990. “Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society.” International Organization 44 (4):479–526.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Harourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Nantermoz, Olivia. 2020. “International Refugee Protection and the Primary Institutions of International Society.” Review of International Studies 46 (2):256–277.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry. 2008. “Theorising the International Rule of Law.” Review of International Studies 34 (385–401).Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia. 2020. “Agents, Structures and Institutions: Some Thoughts on Method.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33 (4):467–470.Google Scholar
Nealson, Kenneth H. and Conrad, Pamela G.. 1999. “Life: Past, Present and Future.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 354 (1392):1923–1939.Google Scholar
Nedal, Dani K. and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2019. “Anarchy and Authority: International Structure, the Balance of Power, and Hierarchy.” Journal of Global Security Studies 4 (2):169–189.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph. 1937. Integrative Levels: A Revaluation of the Idea of Progress. The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1971. “Penan Friendship-Names.” In The Translation of Culture: Essays to E. E. Evans-Pritchard, edited by Beidelman, T. O.. Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1972. “Punan-Penan.” In Ethnic Groups of Insular Southeast Asia. Volume 1: Indonesia, Andaman Islands, and Madagascar, edited by Lebar, Frank M.. Human Relations Area Files Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, I. B. 2002. “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy.” Millennium – Journal of International Studies 31 (3):627–651.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. and Neumann, Iver B.. 2018. “Hegemonic-Order Theory: A Field-Theoretic Account.” European Journal of International Relations 24 (3):662–686.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. and Wright, Thomas. 2007. “What’s at Stake in the American Empire Debate.” American Political Science Review 101 (2):253–271.Google Scholar
Neyer, Jürgen. 2003. “Discourse and Order in the EU: A Deliberative Approach to Multi-Level Governance.” In European Governance, Deliberation and the Quest for Democratisation, edited by Eriksen, Eric O., Joerges, Christian, and Neyer, Jürgen. ARENA and European University Institute.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Daniel J. 2018. “Reconceptualizing the Organism: From Complex Machine to Flowing Stream.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Daniel J. and Gawne, Richard. 2015. “Neither Logical Empiricism nor Vitalism, but Organicism: What the Philosophy of Biology Was.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37 (4):345–381.Google Scholar
Nicolescu, Basarab. 2010. “Methodology of Transdisciplinarity: Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included and Complexity.” Transdisciplinarity in Science and Religion 1 (1):19–38.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1932. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Noble, Denis. 2017. “Evolution Viewed from Physics, Physiology and Medicine.” Interface Focus 7 (5):20160159.Google Scholar
Nordin, Astrid H. M. et al. 2019. “Towards Global Relational Theorizing: A Dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone Scholarship on Relationalism.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (5):570–581.Google Scholar
Normandin, Sebastian and Wolfe, Charles T., eds. 2013. Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science, 1800–2010. Springer.Google Scholar
Nuño de la Rosa, Laura. 2018. “Capturing Process: The Interplay of Modelling Strategies and Conceptual Understanding in Developmental Biology.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nuño de la Rosa, Laura and Müller, Gerd B., eds. 2021. Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide. Springer.Google Scholar
O’Hanlon, Michael. 2000. Technological Change and the Future of Warfare. The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
O’Hanlon, Michael. 2018. A Retrospective on the So-Called Revolution in Military Affairs. The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
O’Siochrú, Michael. 2008. God’s Executioner: Oliver Cromwell and the Conquest of Ireland. Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Oatley, Thomas et al. 2013. “The Political Economy of Global Finance: A Network Model.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (1):133–153.Google Scholar
Obert, Jonathan and Padgett, John F.. 2012. “Conflict Displacement and Dual Inclusion in the Construction of Germany.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. John, Laland, Kevin N., and Feldman, Marcus W.. 1996. “Niche Construction.” The American Naturalist 147 (4):641–648.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. John, Laland, Kevin N., and Feldman, Marcus W.. 2003. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, John et al. 2013. “Niche Construction Theory: A Practical Guide for Ecologists.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 88 (1):3–28.Google Scholar
Oestrich, Gerhard. 1982. Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oh, Si Jin. 2019. “Resolving the Misunderstood Historical Order: A Korean Perspective on the Historical Tributary Order in East Asia.” Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international 21 (3):341–377.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2005. “Multilevel Selection and the Major Transitions in Evolution.” Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1013–1025.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2011. “Précis of Evolution and the Levels of Selection.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (1):212–220.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2018. “Methodological Individualism in Evolutionary Biology and in Social Science: A Comparison.” In Landscapes of Collectivity in the Life Sciences, edited by Gissis, Snait B., Lamm, Ehud, and Shavit, Ayelet. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2020. “The Relation between Kin and Multilevel Selection: An Approach using Causal Graphs.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):435–470.Google Scholar
Oliver, Pamela and Myers, Daniel. 2003. “The Coevolution of Social Movements.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 8 (1):1–24.Google Scholar
Olson, William and Onuf, Nicholas. 1985. “The Growth of a Discipline: Reviewed.” In International Relations: British and American Perspectives, edited by Smith, Steve. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1995. “Levels.” European Journal of International Relations 1 (1):35–58.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 2009. “Structure? What Structure?” International Relations 23 (2):183–199.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L. 1906. International Law: A Treatise. Volume II: War and Neutrality. Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L. 1955. International Law: A Treatise. 8th ed. 2 vols. David McKay Company.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Paul and Putnam, Hilary. 1958. “Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:3–36.Google Scholar
Orsini, Amandine et al. 2020. “Complex Systems and International Governance.” International Studies Review 22 (4):1008–1038.Google Scholar
Osgood, Robert E. and Tucker, Robert W.. 1967. Force, Order, and Justice. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 1998. “Reading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited.” International Studies Quarterly 42 (3):409–432.Google Scholar
Owen, John M. IV. 2010. The Clash of Ideas in World Politics: Transnational Networks, States, and Regime Change, 1510–2010. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, Taylor. 2016. “The Networked State and the End of 20th Century Diplomacy.” Global Affairs 2 (3):301–307.Google Scholar
Paaby, Annalise B. and Rockman, Matthew V.. 2013. “The Many Faces of Pleiotropy.” Trends in Genetics 29 (2):66–73.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. 2012a. “Autocatalysis in Chemistry and the Origin of Life.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter D.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. 2012b. “Country as Global Market: Netherlands, Calvinism, and the Joint-Stock Company.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. 2012c. “The Emergence of Corporate Merchant Banks in Dugento Tuscany.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. 2012d. “Transposition and Refunctionality: The Birth of Partnership Systems in Renaissance Florence.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. 2017. “The Emergence of Organizations and States.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, edited by Victor, Jennifer Nicoll, Montgomery, Alexander H., and Lubell, Mark. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F., McMahan, Peter, and Zhong, Xing. 2012. “Economic Production as Chemistry II.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. 2012a. “Coda: Reflections on the Study of Multiple Networks.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W., eds. 2012b. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. 2012c. “Introduction to Part I, Autocatalysis.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. 2012d. “Introduction to Part IV, Contemporary Capitalism and Science.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. 2012e. “The Problem of Emergence.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Padovani, Flavia. 2013. “Genidentity and Topology of Time: Kurt Lewin and Hans Reichenbach.” In The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism, edited by Milkov, Nikolay and Peckhaus, Volker. Springer.Google Scholar
Palacios, Patricia. 2022. Emergence and Reduction in Physics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Chengxin. 2020. “Enfolding Wholes in Parts: Quantum Holography and International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 26 (S1):14–38.Google Scholar
Panaite, Viorel. 2019. Ottoman Law of War and Peace: The Ottoman Empire and Its Tribute-Payers from the North of the Danube. 2nd revised ed. Brill.Google Scholar
Pańkowska, Malgorzata, ed. 2021. Handbook of Research on Autopoiesis and Self-Sustaining Processes for Organizational Success. IGI Global.Google Scholar
Paoletti, Michele Paolini and Orilia, Francesco, eds. 2017. Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation. Routledge.Google Scholar
Papilloud, Christian. 2018. “Georg Simmel and Relational Sociology.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology, edited by Dépelteau, François. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Papineau, David. 2020. “Naturalism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/naturalism/.Google Scholar
Parent, Joseph M. and Baron, Joshua A.. 2011. “Elder Abuse: How the Moderns Mistreat Classical Realism.” International Studies Review 13 (2):193–213.Google Scholar
Paris, Roland. 2006. “Bringing the Leviathan Back In: Classical versus Contemporary Studies of the Liberal Prace.” International Studies Review 8 (3):425–440.Google Scholar
Parker, David. 2003. “Absolutism, Feudalism and Property Rights in the France of Louis XIV.” Past & Present 179:60–96.Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey. 1976. “The ‘Military Revolution,’ 1560–1660 – A Myth?” Journal of Modern History 48 (2):195–214.Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey. 1996. The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey. 2008. “Crisis and Catastrophe: The Global Crisis of the Seventeenth Century Reconsidered.” The American Historical Review 113 (4):1053–1079.Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey and Smith, Lesley M.. 1997. The General Crisis of the Seventeenth Century. 2nd ed. Routledge.Google Scholar
Parrott, David. 1985. “Strategy and Tactics in the Thirty Years’ War: The ‘Military Revolution’.” Militärgeschichtliche Zeitschrift 38 (2):7–24.Google Scholar
Parrott, David. 2001. Richelieu’s Army: War, Government and Society in France, 1624–1642. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parrott, David. 2012a. “Armed Forces.” In The Oxford Handbook of The Ancien Régime, edited by Doyle, William. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parrott, David. 2012b. The Business of War: Military Enterprise and Military Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parry, R. H., ed. 1970. The English Civil War and After, 1642–1658. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, ed. 1966. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1979. “Concrete Systems and ‘Abstracted’ Systems.” Contemporary Sociology 8 (5):696–705.Google Scholar
Patomaki, Heikki. 2002. After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re)Construction of World Politics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Paul, Michael C. 2004. “The Military Revolution in Russia, 1550–1682.” The Journal of Military History 68 (1):9–45.Google Scholar
Paulle, Bowen, van Heerikhuizen, Bart, and Emirbayer, Mustafa. 2012. “Elias and Bourdieu.” Journal of Classical Sociology 12 (1):69–93.Google Scholar
Payne, Joshua L. and Wagner, Andreas. 2019. “The Causes of Evolvability and their Evolution.” Nature Reviews Genetics 20 (1):24–38.Google Scholar
Payne, Stanley G. 1984. Spanish Catholicism: An Historical Overview. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, Judea. 2009a. “Causal Inference in Statistics: An Overview.” Statistics Surveys 3:96–146.Google Scholar
Pearl, Judea. 2009b. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, Judea, Glymour, Madelyn, and Jewell, Nicholas P.. 2016. Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Pedroso, Makmiller. 2018. “Forming Lineages by Sticking Together.” Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 11 (16):1–15.Google Scholar
Penesyan, Anahit et al. 2021. “Three Faces of Biofilms: A Microbial Lifestyle, a Nascent Multicellular Organism, and an Incubator for Diversity.” npj Biofilms and Microbiomes 7 (80):1–9.Google Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. 1993. The Prince and the Law, 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Penny, David. 2005. “An Interpretive Review of the Origin of Life Research.” Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):633–671.Google Scholar
Penttila, R. E. J. 2003. “The G8 as a Concert of Powers.” Adelphi Papers 43 (355):17–32.Google Scholar
Perdue, Peter C. 2015. “The Tenacious Tributary System.” Journal of Contemporary China 24 (96):1002–1014.Google Scholar
Perkins, Dexter. 1952. The American Approach to Foreign Policy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Edward. 1980. Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Nicolas. 1993. “Demand Sharing: Reciprocity and the Pressure for Generosity among Foragers.” American Anthropologist 95 (4):860–874.Google Scholar
Phillimore, Robert. 1854. Commentaries upon International Law. 3 vols. T. & J. W. Johnson.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew. 2017. “Making Empires: Hierarchy, Conquest and Customization.” In Hierarchies in World Politics, edited by Zarakol, Ayse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew and Sharman, Jason C.. 2015a. “Explaining Durable Diversity in International Systems: State, Company, and Empire in the Indian Ocean.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (3):436–448.Google Scholar
Phillips, Andrew and Sharman, Jason C.. 2015b. International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pickel, Andreas. 2011. “Systems Theory.” In The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, edited by Jarvie, Ian C. and Zamora-Bonilla, Jesús. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Pickering, Jonathan. 2019. “Deliberative Ecologies: Complexity and Social–Ecological Dynamics in International Environmental Negotiations.” Global Environmental Politics 19 (2):61–80.Google Scholar
Piel, Damien et al. 2022. “Phage–Host Coevolution in Natural Populations.” Nature Microbiology 7 (7):1075–1086.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, Massimo. 2001. Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, Massimo and Müller, Gerd B., eds. 2010. Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Plank, Geoffrey. 2006. Rebellion and Savagery: The Jacobite Rising of 1745 and the British Empire. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Plotynski, Anya. 2019. “Cancer.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward M.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/cancer/.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1990. The State: Its Nature, Development and Prospects. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Poli, Roberto. 2009. “Two Theories of Levels of Reality: In Dialogue with Basarab Nicolescu.” Transdisciplinarity in Science and Religion 6:135–150.Google Scholar
Poli, Roberto. 2013. “A Note on the Difference between Complicated and Complex Social Systems.” Cadmus 2 (1). http://cadmus.newwelfare.org/2013/10/27/a-note-on-the-difference-between-complicated-and-complex-social-systems/.Google Scholar
Politis, Nicolas. 1926. New Aspects of International Law. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Poole, Stafford. 1981. “Institutionalized Corruption in the Letrado Bureaucracy: The Case of Pedro Farfán (1568–1588).” The Americas 38 (2):149–171.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Porter, Bryan, ed. 1972. The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919–1969. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Terry B. 2006. “Coevolution as a Research Framework for Organizations and the Natural Environment.” Organization & Environment 19 (4):479–504.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. 1993. “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict.” In Ethnic Conflict and International Security, edited by Brown, Michael E.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. 2017. “Civil Wars and the Structure of World Power.” Daedalus 146 (4):167–179.Google Scholar
Potochnik, Angela. 2021. “Our World Isn’t Organized into Levels.” In Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences, edited by Brooks, Daniel S., DiFrisco, James, and Wimsatt, William C.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Mark. 2003a. Corps and Clienteles: Public Finance and Political Change in France, 1688–1715. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Potter, Mark. 2003b. “War Finance and Absolutist State Development in Early Modern Europe: An Examination of French Venality in the Seventeenth Century.” Journal of Early Modern History 7 (1–2):120–147.Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B. 1922. An Introduction to the Study of International Organization. The Century Company.Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B. 1929. This World of Nations: Foundations, Institutions, Practices. The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B. and West, Roscoe L.. 1927. International Civics: The Community of Nations. The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2010. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2013. “Putting Practice Theory into Practice.” In Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethnking Key Concepts in IR, edited by Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. Routledge.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Povich, Mark and Craver, Carl F.. 2017. “Mechanistic Levels, Reduction, and Emergence.” In The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, edited by Glennan, Stuart and Illari, Phyllis. Routledge.Google Scholar
Powell, Christopher. 2013. “Radical Relationism: A Proposal.” In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, edited by Powell, Christopher and Dépelteau, François. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Powell, Christopher and Dépelteau, François, eds. 2013. Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (4):1303–1320.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1993. “Guns, Butter, and Anarchy.” American Political Science Review 87 (1):115–132.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1994. “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate.” International Organization 48 (2):313–344.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W. and Owen-Smith, Jason. 2012. “An Open Elite: Arbiters, Catalysts, or Gatekeepers in the Dynamics of Industry Evolution?” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., Packalen, Kelley, and Whittington, Kjersten. 2012. “Orrganizational and Institutional Genesis: The Emergence of High-Tech Clusters in the Life Sciences.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W. and Sandholtz, Kurt. 2012. “Chance, Nécessité, et Naïveté: Ingredients to Create a New Organizational Form.” In The Emergence of Organizations and Markets, edited by Padgett, John F. and Powell, Walter W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pradeu, Thomas. 2016. “The Many Faces of Biological Individuality.” Biology & Philosophy 31 (6):761–773.Google Scholar
Pradeu, Thomas. 2018. “Genidentity and Biological Processes.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel. 2016a. “Pragmatism as Ontology, Not (Just) Epistemology: Exploring the Full Horizon of Pragmatism as an Approach to IR Theory.” International Studies Review 18 (3):508–527.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel. 2016b. “A Relational View of Ontological Security in International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 61 (1):78–85.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel et al. 2021. “Pragmatism in IR: The Prospects for Substantive Theorizing.” International Studies Review 23 (4):1933–1958.Google Scholar
Pratt, Tyler. 2018. “Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes.” International Organization 72 (3):561–590.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya. 1975. “Dissipative Structures, Dynamics and Entropy.” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 9 (S9):443–456.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya. 1978. “Time, Structure, and Fluctuations.” Science 201 (4358):777–785.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya. 1987. “Exploring Complexity.” European Journal of Operational Research 30 (2):97–103.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I[lya] and Nicolis, G.. 1967. “On Symmetry-Breaking Instabilities in Dissipative Systems.” The Journal of Chemical Physics 46 (9):3542–3550.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya and Stengers, Isabelle. 1984. Order Out of Chaos: Man’s Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Proctor, Lita M. et al. 2019. “The Integrative Human Microbiome Project.” Nature 569 (7758):641–648.Google Scholar
Pross, Addy. 2016. What is Life? How Chemistry Becomes Biology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K. 2017 [2007]. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Tenth Anniversary Expanded ed. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Purkiss, Diane. 2009. The English Civil War: Papists, Gentlewomen, Soldiers, and Witchfinders in the Birth of Modern Britain. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Putra, Bama Andika. 2019. “ASEAN Political-Security Community: Challenges of Establishing Regional Security in the Southeast Asia.” Journal of International Studies 12 (1):33–49.Google Scholar
Querejazu, Amaya. 2022. “Cosmopraxis: Relational Methods for a Pluriversal IR.” Review of International Studies 48 (5):875–890.Google Scholar
Querengässer, Alexander. 2021. Before the Military Revolution: European Warfare and the Rise of the Early Modern State 1300–1490. Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Rabajante, Jomar F. et al. 2015. “Red Queen Dynamics in Multi-Host and Multi-Parasite Interaction System.” Science Reports 5:10004.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1968. “Forward.” In Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist: A Sourcebook, edited by Buckley, Walter. Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Raska, Michael. 2021. “The Sixth RMA Wave: Disruption in Military Affairs?” Journal of Strategic Studies 44 (4):456–479.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian. 2008. “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism.” Security Studies 17 (2):294–321.Google Scholar
Rawlings, Helen. 2002. Church, Religion, and Society in Early Modern Spain. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ray, Celeste and Fernández-Götz, Manuel, eds. 2019. Historical Ecologies, Heterarchies and Transtemporal Landscapes. Routledge.Google Scholar
Raymond, Gregory A. 1997. “Problems and Prospects in the Study of International Norms.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (S2):205–245.Google Scholar
Raymond, Gregory A. 2021. “Introduction: Order without Leviathan.” In International Norms and the Resort to War, edited by Raymond, Gregory A.. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Wolfgang. 1996a. “Introduction: Power Elites, State Servants, Ruling Classes and the Growth of State Power.” In Power Elites and State Building, edited by Reinhard, Wolfgang. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Reinsch, Paul S. 1900. World Politics at the End of the Nineteenth Century, as Influenced by the Oriental Situation. The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Reinsch, Paul S. 1911. Public International Unions: Their Work and Organization, a Study in International Administrative Law. Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Renault, Emmanuel. 2016. “Critical Theory and Processual Social Ontology.” Journal of Social Ontology 2 (1):17–32.Google Scholar
Rendall, Matthew. 2006. “Defensive Realism and the Concert of Europe.” Review of International Studies 32 (3):523–540.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin and Cherry, John F., eds. 1986. Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1996. Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 2000. Process Philosophy: A Survey of Basic Issues. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ress, Georg. 1984a. “Guarantee.” In Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume 7, edited by Bernhardt, Rudolf. North Holland.Google Scholar
Ress, Georg. 1984b. “Guarantee Treaties.” In Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume 7, edited by Bernhardt, Rudolf. North Holland.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1997. “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions.” International Organization 51 (4):555–589.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan, eds. 2008. Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reuter, Timothy. 2006. Medieval Polities and Modern Mentalities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reutlinger, Alexander et al. 2019. “Ceteris Paribus Laws.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward M.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/lceteris-paribus/.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Susan. 1984. Kingdoms and Communities in Western Europe, 900–1300. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Lewis F. 1960. Arms and Insecurity: A Mathematical Study of the Causes and Origins of War. The Boxwood Press.Google Scholar
Riggs, Fred W. 1961. “International Relations as a Prismatic System.” In The International System: Theoretical Essays, edited by Knorr, Klaus and Verba, Sidney. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin M., Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., and Lobell, Stephen E.. 2016. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2007. “Transnational Actors and World Politics.” In Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, edited by Zmerli, Walther Ch., Holzinger, Markus, and Richter, Klaus. Springer.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rittberger, Volker. 2008. “Global Governance: From ‘Exclusive’ Executive Multilateralism to Inclusive, Multipartite Institutions.” Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association.Google Scholar
Rivière, Jean. 1924. “Sur l’origine de la formule juridique: ‘Rex imperator in regno suo’.” Revue des sciences relgieuses 4:580–586.Google Scholar
Roberts, John T. 2016. “Laws of Nature.” In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, edited by Humphreys, Paul. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, I. S. 1988. “Church and Papacy.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c. 350–c. 1450, edited by Burns, J. H.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, I. S. 2004. “The Papacy, 1122–1198.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 4 c. 1024–c. 1198, Part II, edited by Luscombe, David and Riley-Smith, Jonathan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodger, Nicholas A. M. 2011. “From the ‘Military Revolution’ to the ‘Fiscal-Naval State’.” Journal for Maritime Research 13 (2):119–128.Google Scholar
Rogers, Clifford J. 1993. “The Military Revolutions of the Hundred Years’ War.” The Journal of Military History 57 (2):241–278.Google Scholar
Rogers, Clifford J., ed. 1995. The Military Revolution Debate: Readings on the Military Transformaiton of Early Modern Europe. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rollo-Koster, Joëlle. 2015. Avignon and Its Papacy, 1309–1417: Popes, Institutions, and Society. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rollo-Koster, Joëlle and Izbicki, Thomas M., eds. 2009. A Companion to the Great Western Schism (1378–1417). Brill.Google Scholar
Rorem, Paul. 1993. Pseudo-Dionysius: A Commentary on the Texts and an Introduction to Their Influence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Gideon. 2019. “The Fourth Founding: The United States and the Liberal Order.” Foreign Affairs 98 (1):10–21.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard N. 1963. Action and Reaction in World Politics: International Systems in Perspective. Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard N. 1966. “Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and the Future.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 10 (3):314–327.Google Scholar
Rosen, Robert. 1991. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N., ed. 1961. International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Policy. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 2005. “Illusions of Power and Empire.” History and Theory 44 (4):73–87.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. and Durfee, Mary. 2000. Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1994a. Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 2007. “Reductionism (and Antireductionism) in Biology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Hull, David L. and Ruse, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Eugene and Zilber-Rosenberg, Ilana. 2018. “The Hologenome Concept of Evolution after 10 Years.” Microbiome 6 (1):1–14.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin. 1994b. The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Verso.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin. 2006. “Why Is There No International Historical Sociology?” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3):307–340.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin. 2016. “International Relations in the Prison of Political Science.” International Relations 30 (2):127–153.Google Scholar
Roth, Ariel Ilan. 2009. “Reassurance: A Strategic Basis of U.S. Support for Israel.” International Studies Perspectives 10 (4):378–393.Google Scholar
Roux, Natacha et al. 2020. “Anemonefish, A Model for Eco-Evo-Devo.” Evodevo 11 (1):1–11.Google Scholar
Rowlands, Guy. 2002. The Dynastic State and the Army under Louis XIV: Royal Service and Private Interest 1661–1701. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Royle, Trevor. 2004. The British Civil War: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms, 1638–1660. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Dustin R. et al. 2019. “Coevolution of Genome Architecture and Social Behavior.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 34 (9):844–855.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (5):688.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference. Comment: Which Ifs Have Causal Answers.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (396):961–962.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 2005. “Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes: Design, Modeling, Decisions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 100 (469):322–331.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis.” World Politics 35 (2):261–285.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47 (1):139–174.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Frank M. 1936. Theories of International Relations. D. Appleton-Century Company.Google Scholar
Ruthenberg, Klaus and Mets, Ave. 2020. “Chemistry is Pluralistic.” Foundations of Chemistry 22 (3):403–419.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall D. 1968. “Notes on the Original Affluent Society.” In Man the Hunter, edited by Lee, Richard B. and DeVore, Irven. Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sakwa, Richard. 2021. “Heterarchy: Russian Politics between Chaos and Control.” Post-Soviet Affairs 37 (3):222–241.Google Scholar
Salazar-Ciudad, Isaac. 2021. “Mechanisms of Pattern Formation, Morphogenesis, and Evolution.” In Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide, edited by Rosa, Laura Nuño de la and Müller, Gerd B.. Springer.Google Scholar
Salmon, J. H. M. 1975. Society in Crisis: France in the Sixteenth Century. Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Salmond, Anne. 2012. “Ontological Quarrels: Indigeneity, Exclusion and Citizenship in a Relational World.” Anthropological Theory 12 (2):115–41.Google Scholar
Salter, Mark B. 2002. Barbarians and Civilization in International Relations. Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Salter, Mark B. 2019. “Security Actor-Network Theory: Revitalizing Securitization Theory with Bruno Latour.” Polity 51 (2):349–364.Google Scholar
Salthe, Stanley N. 2009. “A Hierarchical Framework for Levels of Reality: Understanding through Representation.” Axiomathes 19:87–99.Google Scholar
Sampson, Aaron Beers. 2002. “Tropical Anarchy: Waltz, Wendt, and the Way We Imagine International Politics.” Alternatives 27 (4):429–457.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard. 2012. “Massive Modularity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, edited by Samuels, Richard. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanchéz-Avilés, Constanza and Ditrych, Ondrej. 2018. “The Global Drug Prohibition Regime: Prospects for Stability and Change in an Increasingly Less Prohibitionist World.” International Politics 55 (3):463–481.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Stephen K. 1987. “Eclecticism and Its Alternatives.” Current Perspectives in Social Theory 8:315–345.Google Scholar
Sanz, Porfirio. 1994. “The Cities in the Aragonese Cortes in the Medieval and Early Modern Periods.” Parliaments, Estates and Representation 14 (2):95–108.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 2008 [2006]. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Updated ed. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Savage, Glenn C. 2020. “What is Policy Assemblage?” Territory, Politics, Governance 8 (3):319–335.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. Keith. 2005. Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saylor, Ryan. 2020. “Why Causal Mechanisms and Process Tracing Should Alter Case Selection Guidance.” Sociological Methods & Research 49 (4):982–1017.Google Scholar
Sazak, Selim Can. 2020. “Bad Influence: Social Networks, Elite Brokerage, and the Construction of Alliances.” European Journal of International Relations 25 (S1):64–90.Google Scholar
Scartozzi, Cesare M. 2018. “A New Taxonomy for International Relations: Rethinking the International System as a Complex Adaptive System.” Journal on Policy and Complex Systems 4 (1):109–133.Google Scholar
Scerri, Eric. 2007. “Reduction and Emergence in Chemistry: Two Recent Approaches.” Philosophy of Science 74 (5):920–931.Google Scholar
Schakel, Arjan H., Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2015. “Multilevel Governance and the State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, edited by Leibfried, Stefan et al. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore. 2016. “Practice Theory as Flat Ontology.” In Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life, edited by Spaargaren, Gert, Weenink, Don, and Lamers, Machiel. Routledge.Google Scholar
Schieder, Siegfried and Spindler, Manuela. 2014. “Theory in International Relations.” In Theories of International Relations, edited by Schieder, Siegfried and Spindler, Manuela. Routledge.Google Scholar
Schieve, William C. and Allen, Peter M., eds. 1982. Self-Organization and Dissipative Structures: Applications in the Physical and Social Sciences. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. 2002. “Anarchy, World Politics and the Birth of a Discipline: American International Relations, Pluralism and the Myth of Interwar Idealism.” International Relations 16 (1):9–31.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. 2004. “Realism as Tragedy.” Review of International Studies 30 (3):427–441.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Andreas, Witte, Daniel, and Gengnagel, Vincent. 2017. “Pluralizing Field Analysis: Toward a Relational Understanding of the Field of Power.” Social Science Information 56 (1):49–73.Google Scholar
Schneider, Volker. 2015. “Relationalism in Political Theory and Research: The Challenge of Networked Politics and Policy-Making.” Political Science Review 4:191–206.Google Scholar
Schoellhammer, Sarah. 2020. Innovation Exposed: Case Studies of Strategy, Organization and Culture in Heterarchies. Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
Schouenborg, Laust. 2013. The Scandinavian International Society: Primary Institutions and Binding Forces, 1815–2010. Routledge.Google Scholar
Schouten, Peer. 2014. “Security as Controversy: Reassembling Security at Amsterdam Airport.” Security Dialogue 45 (1):23–42.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, Erwin. 2012 [1944]. What is Life? With Mind and Matter and Autobiographical Sketches. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, Matthias. 2017. “The Concert of Europe and International Security Governance.” In Great Power Multilateralism and the Prevention of War, edited by Müller, Harald and Rauch, Carsten. Routledge.Google Scholar
Schuman, Frederick Lewis. 1933. International Politics: An Introduction to the Western State System. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schwaninger, M. 2000. “Distributed Control in Social Systems.” In The Performance of Social Systems: Perspectives and Problems, edited by Luna, Francisco Parra. Springer.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Rolf. 2017. “Project for a Kantian Europe.” Democracy and Security 13 (2):144–165.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg. 1951. Power Politics: A Study of International Society. 2nd ed. Stevens/F. A. Praeger.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg. 1955. “The Standard of Civilisation in International Law.” Current Legal Problems 8:212–234.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1993. “Tripolarity and the Second World War.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (1):73–103.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1997. “New Realist Research on Alliances: Refining, Not Refuting, Waltz’s Balancing Proposition.” American Political Science Review 91 (4):927–930.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1999. “Forum: Fantasy Theory.” Review of International Studies 25 (1):147–150.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 2003. “The Progressiveness of Neo-Classical Realism.” In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, edited by Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendis. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 2006. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 2010. “Entropy and the Trajectory of World Politics: Why Polarity Has Become Less Meaningful.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23 (1):145–163.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 2014. Maxwell’s Demon and the Golden Apple: Global Discord in the New Millennium. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. and Wohlforth, William C.. 2002. “Power Test: Evaluating Realism in Response to the End of the Cold War.” Security Studies 9 (3):60–107.Google Scholar
Scott, David. 2004. Politics and War in the Three Stuart Kingdoms, 1637–49. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scott, H. M. and Storrs, Christopher. 2007. “The Consolidation of Noble Power in Europe, c. 1600–1800.” In The European Nobilities in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Volume I: Western and Southern Europe, 2nd ed., edited by Scott, H. M.. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scott, Tom. 1998. “Germany and the Empire.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, Nathan Alexander. 2017. “The Neoclassical Realist Research Program: Between Progressive Promise and Degenerative Dangers.” International Politics Reviews 5 (1):21–31.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason. 2021. “What Can Multi-Method Research Add to Experiments?” In Advances in Experimental Political Science, edited by Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason and Collier, David. 2010. “Glossary.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed., edited by Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Seibt, Johanna, ed. 2011. Process Theories: Crossdisciplinary Studies in Dynamic Categories. Springer Science.Google Scholar
Seibt, Johanna. 2017. “Units and Levels of Selection.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/process-philosophy/.Google Scholar
Seibt, Johanna. 2018. “Ontological Tools for the Process Turn in Biology: Some Basic Notions of General Proocess Theory.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Selg, Peeter. 2016. “Two Faces of the ‘Relational Turn’.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (1):27–31.Google Scholar
Sellato, Bernard. 1994 [1989]. Nomads of the Borneo Rainforest: The Economics, Politics, and Ideology of Settling Down. University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Sellato, Bernard. 2007. “Resourceful Children of the Forest: The Kalimantan Punan through the Twentieth Century.” In Beyond the Green Myth: Hunter-Gatherers of Borneo in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Sercombe, Peter G. and Sellato, Bernard. NIAS Press.Google Scholar
Sender, Ron, Fuchs, Shai, and Milo, Ron. 2016. “Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the Body.” PLoS Biology 14 (8):e1002533.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (1):1–29.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, Paul B. and Miller, Gregory A.. 2019. “Reduction and Autonomy in Psychology and Neuroscience: A Call for Pragmatism.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 39 (1):18.Google Scholar
Sharp, Walter R. and Kirk, Grayson L.. 1940. Contemporary International Politics. Farrar & Rinehart.Google Scholar
Sheredos, Benjamin and Bechtel, William. 2019. “Imagining Mechanisms with Diagrams.” In The Scientific Imagination, edited by Levy, Arnon and Godfrey-Smith, Peter. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1975. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shotwell, James T. 1929. War as an Instrument of Policy and Its Renunciation in the Pact of Paris. Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America.” International Organization 47 (Summer):411–441.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2010a. “Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2):411–431.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2010b. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Silberbauer, George B. 1981. Hunter and Habitat in the Central Kalahari Desert. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silberbauer, George B. 1982. “Political Process in G/wi Bands.” In Politics and History in Band Societies, edited by Leacock, Eleanor and Lee, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silberbauer, George B. 1996. “Neither Are Your Ways My Ways.” In Cultural Diversity among Twentieth-Century Foragers, edited by Kent, Susan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simão, Licínia. 2017. The EU’s Neighbourhood Policy towards the South Caucasus: Expanding the European Security Community. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1962. “The Architecture of Complexity.” Proceedings of the American Philological Society 106 (6):467–482.Google Scholar
Simon, Jean-Christophe et al. 2019. “Host-Microbiota Interactions: From Holobiont Theory to Analysis.” Microbiome 7 (1):1–5.Google Scholar
Simonds, Frank H. and Emeny, Brooks. 1935. The Great Powers and World Politics: International Relations and Economic Nationalism. American Book Company.Google Scholar
Simons, Peter. 2018. “Processes and Precipitates.” In Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, edited by Dupré, John and Nicholson, Daniel J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, George Gaylord. 1944. Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David. 1961. “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations.” World Politics 14 (1):77–92.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, ed. 1968. Quantitative International Politics: Insights and Evidence. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Deepak. 1996. “The Heterarchical Society: Explaining and Understanding Post-Cold War International Relations.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Miami.Google Scholar
Sinopoli, Carla M. 1994. “The Archaeology of Empires.” Annual Review of Anthropology 23:159–180.Google Scholar
Sivéry, Gérard. 1999. “Social Change in the Thirteenth Century: Rural Society.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume V c. 1198–c. 1300, edited by Abulafia, David. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skalník, Peter. 1978. “The Early State as a Process.” In The Early State, edited by Claessen, Henri J. M. and Skalník, Peter. Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Skiadas, Christos H. and Skiadas, Charilaos, eds. 2017. Handbook of Applications of Chaos Theory. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Skillings, Derek. 2016. “Holobionts and the Ecology of Organisms: Multi-Species Communities or Integrated Individuals?” Biology & Philosophy 31 (6):875–892.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1995. “Liberal International Relations Theory and International Economic Law.” American University Journal of International Law and Policy 10 (2):717–743.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Steven. 2019. “The G20 and Realist International Relations Theory.” In The G20 and International Relations Theory: Perspectives on Global Summitry, edited by Slaughter, Steven. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Small, David B. 1995. “Heterarchical Paths to Evolution: The Role of External Economies.” In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Ehrenreich, Robert M., Crumley, Carole L., and Levy, Janet E.. American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Smith, M. G. 1956. “On Segmentary Lineage Systems.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 86 (2):39–80.Google Scholar
Smith, M. G. 1966. “A Structural Approach to Comparative Politics.” In Varieties of Political Theories, edited by Easton, David. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marisya, eds. 1996. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1991a. “International Cooperation among Relative Gains Maximizers.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (4):387–402.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1991b. “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation.” American Political Science Review 85 (3):701–726.Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. 1961. Deterrence and Defense: Toward a Theory of National Security. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. 1996. “Process Variables in Neorealist Theory.” Security Studies 5 (3):167–192.Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. and Diesing, Paul. 1977. Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2002. “Anarchy and Culture: Insights from the Anthropology of War.” International Organization 56 (1):7–45.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack and Jervis, Robert, eds. 1993. Coping with Complexity in the International System. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1993 [1984]. The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1999. “The Multiple Realizability Argument Against Reductionism.” Philosophy of Science 66 (4):542–564.Google Scholar
Solé, Ricard V. and Bascompte, Jordi. 2012. Self-Organization in Complex Ecosystems. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Solovieff, Nadia et al. 2013. “Pleiotropy in Complex Traits: Challenges and Strategies.” Nature Reviews Genetics 14 (7):483–495.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Johann P. 2016 [2012]. “Early Modern Absolutism in Practice and Theory.” In Monarchism and Absolutism in Early Modern Europe, edited by Cuttica, Cesare and Burgess, Glenn. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sotomayor, Marilda, Pérez-Castrillo, David, and Castiglione, Filippo, eds. 2020. Complex Social and Behavioral Systems: Game Theory and Agent-Based Models. SpringerGoogle Scholar
Spandler, Kilian. 2015. “The Political International Society: Change in Primary and Secondary Institutions.” Review of International Studies 41 (3):601–622.Google Scholar
Sperling, James and Webber, Mark. 2014. “Security Governance in Europe: A Return to System.” European Security 23 (2):126–144.Google Scholar
Spickard, James V. 2004. “Globalization and Religious Organizations: Rethinking the Relationship between Church, Culture, and Market.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 18 (1):47–63.Google Scholar
Sprout, Harold and Sprout, Margaret, eds. 1945. Foundations of National Power: Readings on World Politics and American Security. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sprout, Harold and Sprout, Margaret. 1965. The Ecological Perspective on Human Affairs: With Special Reference to International Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2002. “The Origins, Development, and Possible Decline of the Modern State.” Annual Review of Political Science 5 (1):127–149.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2017. “Collective Imaginations and International Order: The Contemporary Context of the Chinese Tributary System.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 77 (1):21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 2020. The World Imagined: Collective Beliefs and Political Order in the Sinocentric, Islamic and Southeast Asian International Societies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spykman, Nicholas J. 1942. America’s Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power. Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Stampnitzky, Lisa. 2013. Disciplining Terror: How Experts Invented ‘Terrorism’. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, David. 1999. “Heterarchy: Distributing Authority and Organizing Diversity.” In The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise, edited by Clippinger III, John Heny. Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 2016 [2013]. On Geopolitics: Space, Place, and International Relations. Routledge.Google Scholar
Stearns, Frank W. 2010. “One Hundred Years of Pleiotropy: A Retrospective.” Genetics 186 (3):767–773.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. Ledyard Jr. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Steel, Daniel. 2004. “Social Mechanisms and Causal Inference.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):55–78.Google Scholar
Steel, Daniel. 2008. Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George, ed. 2005. The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. 2007. The Devil’s Handwriting: Precoloniality and the German Colonial State in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. 2008. “The Colonial State as a Social Field: Ethnographic Capital and Native Policy in the German Overseas Empire before 1914.” American Sociological Review 73 (4):589–612.Google Scholar
Stensrud, Astrid B. 2016. “Climate Change, Water Practices and Relational Worlds in the Andes.” Ethnos 81 (1):75–98.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Paul. 2013. “Twenty Years of Multi-Level Governance: ‘Where Does It Come From? What Is It? Where Is It Going?’.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (6):817–837.Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2002. Theories of International Cooperation and the Primacy of Anarchy: Explaining U.S. International Policy-Making after Bretton Woods. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Stetter, Stephan. 2013. “Some Quanta of Solace: World Politics in the Era of Functional Differentiation.” In Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, edited by Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zurn, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiner, Mary C. 2021. “The Challenges of Documenting Coevolution and Niche Construction: The Example of Domestic Spaces.” Evolutionary Anthropology 30 (1):63–70.Google Scholar
Stivachtis, Yannis A. 2000. “The International System and the Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction.” Journal of Strategic Studies 23 (1):101–131.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. et al. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stolz, Jörg. 2016. “Opening the Black Box: How the Study of Social Mechanisms Can Benefit from the Use of Explanatory Mixed Methods.” Analyse & Kritik 38 (1):257–286.Google Scholar
Storey, David, ed. 2020. A Research Agenda for Territory and Territoriality. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Storrs, Christopher, ed. 2009. The Fiscal-Military State in Eighteenth-Century Europe: Essays in Honour of P. G. M. Dickson. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Storrs, Christopher. 2019. “War and the Military Revolution.” In Interpreting Early Modern Europe, edited by Dixon, C. Scott and Kümin, Beat. Routledge.Google Scholar
Storrs, Christopher and Scott, H.M.. 1996. “The Military Revolution and the European Nobility, c. 1600–1800.” War in History 3 (1):1–41.Google Scholar
Stovel, Katherine and Shaw, Lynette. 2012. “Brokerage.” Annual Review of Sociology 38:139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoyle, Mark. 2005. Soldiers and Strangers: An Ethnic History of the English Civil War. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Strang, David. 1991. “Global Patterns of Decolonization, 1500–1987.” International Studies Quarterly 35 (4):429–454.Google Scholar
Strauss, Bernhard et al., eds. 2021. Rethinking Cancer: A New Paradigm for the Postgenomics Era. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Strausz-Hupé, Robert. 1942. Geopolitics: The Struggle for Space and Power. G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Strayer, Joseph R. 1970. On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Streinzer, Andreas. 2016. “Stretching Money to Pay the Bills: Temporal Modalities and Relational Practices of ‘Getting By’ in the Greek Economic Crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 34 (1):45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Philip H. 1994. The Reforms of the Council of Constance (1414–1418). E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Sugawara, Kazuyoshi. 2005. “Possession, Equality and Gender Relations in /Gui Discourse.” In Property and Equality: Ritualisation, Sharing, Egalitarianism, edited by Widlok, Thomas and Tadesse, Wolde Gossa. Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Sugawara, Kazuyoshi. 2012. “Interactive Significance of Simultaneous Discource or Overlap in Everyday Conversations among /Gui Former Foragers.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (5):577–618.Google Scholar
Sultan, Sonia E. 2015. Organism and Environment: Ecological Development, Niche Construction, and Adaptation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sultan, Sonia E. 2021. “Phenotypic Plasticity as an Intrinsic Property of Organisms.” In Phenotypic Plasticity & Evolution: Causes, Consequences, Controversies, edited by Pfennig, David W.. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Nicola M. 1992. “The Origins of the Thirty Years War and the Structure of European Politics.” The English Historical Review 107 (424):587–625.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2005. “Japan’s Socialization into Janus-Faced European International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 11 (1):137–164.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2009. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society. Routledge.Google Scholar
Swann, Julian. 2001. “The State and Political Culture.” In Old Regime France 1648–1788, edited by Doyle, William. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swann, Julian. 2003. Provincial Power and Absolute Monarchy: The Estates General of Burgundy, 1661–1790. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swann, Julian. 2007. “The French Nobility in the Eighteenth Century.” In The European Nobilities in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Volume I: Western and Southern Europe, 2nd ed., edited by Scott, H. M.. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 2018. “How to Use Max Weber’s Ideal Types in Sociological Analysis.” Journal of Classical Sociology 18 (3):181–196.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard and Agevall, Ola. 2016. The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts. 2nd ed. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Symons, John, Pombo, Olga, and Manuel Torres, Juan, eds. 2011. Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science. Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Szathmáry, Eörs. 2015. “Toward Major Evolutionary Transitions Theory 2.0.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (33):10104–10111.Google Scholar
Szathmáry, Eörs and Maynard Smith, John. 1995. “The Major Evolutionary Transitions.” Nature 374 (6519):227–232.Google Scholar
Szechi, Daniel. 1994. The Jacobites: Britain and Europe, 1688–1788. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Szechi, Daniel. 2002. “The Jacobite Movement.” In A Companion to Eighteenth-Century Britain, edited by Dickinson, H. T.. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Szechi, Daniel. 2012. “Scottish Jacobinism in Its International Context.” In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Scottish History, edited by Devine, T. M. and Wormald, Jenny. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tahara, Takeru et al. 2018. “Asymptotic Stability of a Modified Lotka-Volterra Model with Small Immigrations.” Scientific Reports 8 (1):1–7.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. 2000/2001. “Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited.” International Security 25 (3):128–161.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Jiro and Sugawara, Kazuyoshi. 1999. “/Gui and //Gana.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, edited by Lee, Richard B. and Daly, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, Frank. 1955. The American Tradition in Foreign Policy. University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Tavassoly, Iman, Goldfarb, Joseph, and Iyengar, Ravi. 2018. “Systems Biology Primer: The Basic Methods and Approaches.” Essays in Biochemistry 62 (4):487–500.Google Scholar
Tellenbach, Gerd. 1959. Church, State and Christian Society at the Time of the Investiture Contest. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tëmkin, Ilya and Eldredge, Niles. 2015. “Networks and Hierarchies: Approaching Complexity in Evolutionary Theory.” In Macroevolution: Explanation, Interpretation, Evidence, edited by Serrelli, Emanuele and Gontier, Nathalie. Springer.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 2002. “Idiosyncratic Production Regimes: Co-evolution of Economic and Legal Institutions in the Varieties of Capitalism.” Proceedings of the British Academy 112:161–181.Google Scholar
Teufel, Thomas. 2011. “Wholes that Cause Their Parts: Organic Self-Reproduction and the Reality of Biological Teleology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (2):252–260.Google Scholar
Theibault, John. 1993. “The Rhetoric of Death and Destruction in the Thirty Years War.” Journal of Social History 27 (2):271–290.Google Scholar
Theis, Kevin R. et al. 2016. “Getting the Hologenome Concept Right: An Eco-Evolutionary Framework for Hosts and Their Microbiomes.” Msystems 1 (2):e00028–16.Google Scholar
Thelen, Tatjana, Vetters, Larissa, and von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet. 2018. Stategraphy: Toward a Relational Anthropology of the State. Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Thies, Cameron G. 2010. “State Socialization and Structural Realism.” Security Studies 19 (4):689–717.Google Scholar
Thomas, Martin, Moore, Bob, and Butler, Larry. 2015. Crises of Empire: Decolonization and Europe’s Imperial States. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Thompson, I. A. A. 1967. “The Armada and Administrative Reform: The Spanish Council of War in the Reign of Philip II.” The English Historical Review 82 (325):698–725.Google Scholar
Thompson, John N. 1999. “The Evolution of Species Interactions.” Science 284 (5423):2116–2118.Google Scholar
Thompson, John N. 2005. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, John N. 2009. “Coevolution.” In The Princeton Guide to Ecology, edited by Levin, Simon A. et al. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, John N., Segraves, Kari A., and Althoff, David M.. 2021. “Coevolution and Macroevolution.” In Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide, edited by Rosa, Laura Nuño de la and Müller, Gerd B.. Springer.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. 1973. “The Regional Subsystem: A Conceptual Explication and a Propositional Inventory.” International Studies Quarterly 17 (1):89–117.Google Scholar
Thurner, Paul W. et al. 2019. “Network Interdependencies and the Evolution of the International Arms Trade.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (7):1736–1764.Google Scholar
Thurner, Stefan, Hanel, Rudolf, and Klimek, Peter. 2018. Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 2014. A Feminist Voyage through International Relations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. 1961. The Crisis of Church and State, 1050–1300. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1995. “To Explain Political Processes.” American Journal of Sociology 100 (6):1594–1610.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2001a. “Mechanisms in Political Processes.” Annual Review of Political Science 4:21–41.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2001b. “Relational Origins of Inequality.” Anthropological Theory 1 (3):355–372.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2010. “Mechanisms of the Middle Range.” In Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science, edited by Calhoun, Craig. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tirard, Stéphan. 2015. “Life.” In Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences, edited by Heams, Thomas et al. Springer.Google Scholar
Toje, A. and Kunz, B., eds. 2012. Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back In. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. 2012. “Governance Networks.” In The Oxford Handbook of Governance, edited by Levi-Faur, David. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torre, Angelo. 2009. “Empowering Interactions and Entwining Jurisdictions.” In Empowering Interactions: Political Culture and the Emergence of the State in Europe, 1300–1900, edited by Holenstein, André, Blockmans, Wim, and Mathieu, Jon. Ashgagte Publishing.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc. 2012. The Cold War and After: History, Theory, and the Logic of International Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh R. 1959. “The General Crisis of the 17th Century.” Past & Present 16:31–64.Google Scholar
Trueblood, Benjamin Franklin. 1899. The Federation of the World. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
Tsekeris, Charalambos. 2013. “Norbert Elias on Relations: Insights and Perspectives.” In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, edited by Powell, Christopher and Dépelteau, François. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tuathail, Gearóid Ó. 1996. Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Colin M. 1968. “The Importance of Flux in Two Hunting Societies.” In Man the Hunter, edited by Lee, Richard B. and DeVore, Irven. Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Colin M. 1981. “Mbuti Womanhood.” In Woman the Gatherer, edited by Dahlberg, Frances. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. Scott. 2000. The Extended Organism: The Physiology of Animal-Built Structures. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. Scott. 2004. “Extended Phenotypes and Extended Organisms.” Biology and Philosophy 19 (3):327–352.Google Scholar
Turner, J. Scott. 2016. “Homeostasis and the Physiological Dimension of Niche Construction Theory in Ecology and Evolution.” Evolutionary Ecology 30 (2):203–219.Google Scholar
Twiss, Travers. 1861. The Law of Nations Considered as Independent Political Communities. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tzouvala, Ntina. 2020. Capitalism as Civilisation: A History of International Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uller, Tobias et al. 2018. “Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.” Genetics 209 (4):949–966.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter. 1975. Law and Politics in the Middle Ages: An Introduction to the Sources of Medieval Political Ideas. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter. 1979. “This Realm of England is an Empire.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 30 (2):175–203.Google Scholar
Ulrich, H. and Probst, G. J. B., eds. 1984. Self-Organization and Management of Social Systems: Insights, Promises, Doubts, and Questions. Spinger-Verlag.Google Scholar
Vale, Malcolm. 1998. “France at the End of the Hundred Years War (c. 1420–1461).” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VII c. 1415–c. 1500, edited by Allmand, Christopher. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Ham, Peter and Medvedev, Sergei. 2002. Mapping European Security after Kosovo. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
van Hateren, J. H. 2017. “A Unifying Theory of Biological Function.” Biological Theory 12 (2):112–126.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter. 2002. “What Do We Refer to When We Say “I”?” In The Blackwell Guide to Metaphysics, edited by Gale, Richard M.. Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Krieken, Robert. 2001. “Norbert Elias and Process Sociology.” In Handbook of Social Theory, edited by Ritzer, George and Smart, Barry. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1997. “The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz’s Balancing Proposition.” American Political Science Review 91 (4):899–912.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emerich de. 1916 [1758]. The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law Applied to the Conduct of the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns. The Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Veit, Walter. 2022. “Scaffolding Natural Selection.” Biological Theory 17 (2):163–180.Google Scholar
Verzijl, J. H. W. 1968. International Law in Historical Perspective: Part II, International Persons. A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Victor, Jennifer Nicoll, Montgomery, Alexander H., and Lubell, Mark. 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne. 2013. “Stratificatory Differentiation as a Constitutive Principle of the International System.” In Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, edited by Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zurn, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne. 2020. “‘Systemically Significant States’: Tracing the G20’s Membership Category as a New Logic of Stratification in the International System.” Global Society 34 (3):335–352.Google Scholar
Von Bertalanffy, Ludwig. 1950. “The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology.” Science 111 (2872):23–29.Google Scholar
Von Bertalanffy, Ludwig. 1968. General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller.Google Scholar
von Foerster, Heinz. 2007 [1959]. “On Self-Organizing Systems and Their Environments.” In Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition, edited by von Foerster, Heinz. Springer-Verlag New York.Google Scholar
Vrba, Elisabeth S. 1993. “Turnover-pulses, the Red Queen, and Related Topics.” American Journal of Science 293 (A):418–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrba, Elisabeth S. and Eldredge, Niles. 1984. “Individuals, Hierarchies and Processes: Towards a More Complete Evolutionary Theory.” Paleobiology 10 (2):146–171.Google Scholar
Vrba, Elisabeth S. and Jay Gould, Stephen. 1986. “The Hierarchical Expansion of Sorting and Selection: Sorting and Selection Cannot Be Equated.” Paleobiology 12 (2):217–228.Google Scholar
Vucetic, Srdjan. 2011. “Bound to Follow? The Anglosphere and US-Led Coalitions of the Willing, 1950–2001.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (1):27–49.Google Scholar
Waever, Ole. 1998. “Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in the West European Non-War Community.” In Security Communities, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waever, Ole. 2009. “Waltz’s Theory of Theory.” International Relations 23 (2):201–222.Google Scholar
Wagner, Günter P., Pavlicev, Mihaela, and Cheverud, James M.. 2007. “The Road to Modularity.” Nature Reviews Genetics 8 (12):921–931.Google Scholar
Wagner, Maren. 2016. Social Emergence in International Relations: Institutional Dynamics in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 1983. “The Theory of Games and the Problem of International Cooperation.” American Political Science Review 77 (2):330–346.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 1993. “What was Bipolarity?” International Organization 47 (1):77–106.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 2007. War and the State: The Theory of International Politics. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia. 2007. “Complexity Theory, Systems Theory, and Multiple Intersecting Social Inequalities.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):449–470.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia. 2009. Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Waldner, David. 2012. “Process Tracing and Causal Mechanisms.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by Kincaid, Harold. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldner, David. 2015. “What Makes Process Tracing Good? Causal Mechanisms, Causal Inference, and the Completeness Standard in Comparative Politics.” In Process Tracing: From Meatphor to Analytical Tool, edited by Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2011 [1976]. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. M. 2008. “Teleology.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, Edmund A., ed. 1922. The History and Nature of International Relations. The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1988. “Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: The Case of Southwest Asia.” International Organization 42 (2):275–316.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1998. “International Relations: One World, Many Theories.” Foreign Policy 110:29–46.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 1997. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization 51 (3):335–364.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1981. “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better.” Adelphi Papers 171:1–32.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986. “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics.” In Neo-Realism and Its Critics, edited by Keohane, Robert O.. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1988. “The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 (4):615–628.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1990a. “Nuclear Myths and Political Realities.” American Political Science Review 84 (3):731–745.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1990b. “Realist Thought and Neo-Realist Theory.” Journal of International Affairs 44 (1):21–37.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1993. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics.” International Security 18 (2):44–79.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1997. “Evaluating Theories.” American Political Science Review 91 (4):913–917.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2000. “Structural Realism after the Cold War.” International Security 25 (1):5–41.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2004. “Neorealism: Confusions and Criticisms.” Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1):2–6.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2007. “Kenneth N. Waltz.” In 10 x 10, edited by Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis, Rasmussen, Ole Dahl, and Waever, Ole. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. and Kreisler, Harry. 2003. “Theory and International Politics. Conversation with Kenneth N. Waltz.” www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9eV5gPlPZg.Google Scholar
Wang, Liping and Adams, Julia. 2011. “Interlocking Patrimonialisms and State Formation in Qing China and Early Modern Europe.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 636 (1):164–181.Google Scholar
Wang, Zhi, Liao, Ben-Yang, and Zhang, Jianzhi. 2010. “Genomic Patterns of Pleiotropy and the Evolution of Complexity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (42):18034–18039.Google Scholar
Ward, Kevin. 2010. “Towards a Relational Comparative Approach to the Study of Cities.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (4):471–487.Google Scholar
Ware, Edith E. 1934. The Study of International Relations in the United States. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waskan, Jonathan. 2011. “Mechanistic Explanation at the Limit.” Synthese 183 (3):389–408.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Kyoko et al. 2019. “A Global Overview of Pleiotropy and Genetic Architecture in Complex Traits.” Nature Genetics 51 (9):1339–1348.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Routledge.Google Scholar
Watt, J. A. 1999. “The Papacy.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume V c. 1198–c. 1300, edited by Abulafia, David. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Christopher. 2014. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things. Routledge.Google Scholar
Watts, John. 2009. The Making of Polities: Europe 1300–1500. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Helmick Beavin, Janet, and Jackson, Don D.. 1967. Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Inter-Actional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. Norton.Google Scholar
Webber, Mark. 1996. The International Politics of Russia and the Successor States. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Bruce H. 2010. “What is Life? Defining Life in the Context of Emergent Complexity.” Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 40 (2):221–229.Google Scholar
Weber, Eugen. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Katja. 1997. “Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: A Transaction Costs Approach to International Security Cooperation.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (2):321–340.Google Scholar
Weber, Katja. 2000. Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: Transaction Costs and Institutional Choice. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. 2 vols. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1994. Weber: Political Writings. Edited by Lassman, Peter and Speirs, Ronald. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Yuval. 2019. “Measuring Hierarchy in the European Union and Eastern Partnership Countries.” In Resilience and the EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood Countries, edited by Rouet, Gilles and Pascariu, Gabriela Carmen. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wegner, Lars H. and Lüttge, Ulrich, eds. 2019. Emergence and Modularity in Life Sciences. Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijer, Cornelis J. 2004. “Dictyostelium Morphogenesis.” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 14 (4):392–398.Google Scholar
Weinert, Matthew S. 2007. “Bridging the Human Rights-Sovereignty Divide: Theoretical Foundations of Democratic Sovereignty.” Human Rights Review 8 (2):5–32.Google Scholar
Weinert, Matthew S. 2016. “Regional Multilateralism and the Reconfiguration of International Society: A View from the English School.” In Seeking Order in Anarchy: Multilateralism as State Strategy, edited by Murray, Robert W.. University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Daniel M., Watson, Richard A., and Chao, Lin. 2005. “Perspective: Sign Epistasis and Genetic Constraint on Evolutionary Trajectories.” Evolution 59 (6):1165–1174.Google Scholar
Weis, Eberhard. 1986. “Enlightenment and Absolutism in the Holy Roman Empire: Thoughts on Enlightened Absolutism in Germany.” The Journal of Modern History 58:S181–S197.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Michael, Needham, Paul, and Hendry, Robin. 2019. “Philosophy of Chemistry.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/chemistry/.Google Scholar
Weiss, Moritz. 2018. “How to Become a First Mover? Mechanisms of Military Innovation and the Development of Drones.” European Journal of International Security 3 (2):187.Google Scholar
Weltman, John J. 1973. Systems Theory in International Relations: A Study in Metaphoric Hypertrophy. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (3):335–370.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2):391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2003. “Why a World State is Inevitable.” European Journal of International Relations 9 (4):491–542.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2005. “Agency, Teleology and the World State: A Reply to Shannon.” European Journal of International Relations 11 (4):589–598.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2015. Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander and Friedheim, Daniel. 1995. “Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State.” International Organization 49 (4):689–721.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, Mary Jane. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whaley, Joachim. 2012. Germany and the Holy Roman Empire. Volume I: From Maximilian I to the Peace of Westphalia 1493–1648. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wheaton, Henry. 1866. Elements of International Law. 8th ed. Little, Brown and Company. Reprint, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, James Scott. 2002. The Irish and British Wars, 1637–1654: Triumph, Tragedy, and Failure. Routledge.Google Scholar
White, Harrison C. 1992. Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
White, Harrison C. 2008. Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge. 2nd ed. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whittlesey, Derwent. 1939. The Earth and the State: A Study of Political Geography. Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert. 1961 [1948]. Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and Machine. 2nd ed. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wiessner, Polly. 1982. “Risk, Reciprocity and Social Influence on !Kung San Economics.” In Politics and History in Band Societies, edited by Leacock, Eleanor and Lee, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiessner, Polly. 1986. “!Kung San Networks in a Generational Perspective.” In The Past and Future of !Kung Ethnography: Critical Reflections and Symbolic Perspectives. Essays in Honour of Lorna Marshall, edited by Biesele, Megan. Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Wight, Colin. 2006. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Lauren B. 2015. Bodies of Violence: Theorizing Embodied Subjects in International Relations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, E. N. 1999 [1970]. The Ancien Régime in Europe: Government and Society in the Major States, 1648–1789. Pimlico.Google Scholar
Williams, George C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, George C. 1992. Natural Selection: Domains, Levels and Challenges. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Patrick. 2010. The Great Favourite: The Duke of Lerma and the Court and Government of Philip III of Spain, 1598–1621. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Willoughby, Westel Woodbury. 1896. An Examination of the Nature of the State: A Study in Political Philosophy. Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan and Sober, Elliott. 1989. “Reviving the Superorganism.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 136 (3):337–356.Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan and Sober, Elliott. 1994. “Reintroducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):585–608.Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter. 2012. “The English School Meets the Chicago School: The Case for a Grounded Theory of International Institutions.” International Studies Review 14 (4):567–590.Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter H. 2004. From Reich to Revolution: German History, 1558–1806. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter H. 2009. The Thirty Years War: Europe’s Tragedy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter H. 2016. Heart of Europe: A History of the Holy Roman Empire. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. 1994. “The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 24 (sup1):207–274.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. 2007. Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winder, Nick, McIntosh, Brian S., and Jeffrey, Paul. 2005. “The Origin, Diagnostic Attributes and Practical Application of Co-evolutionary Theory.” Ecological Economics 54 (4):347–361.Google Scholar
Winning, Jason. 2020. “Mechanistic Causation and Constraints: Perspectival Parts and Powers, Non-perspectival Modal Patterns.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1385–1409.Google Scholar
Wivel, Anders. 2013. “The Politics of International Theory: Reading Waltz 1979 as a Classic.” In Classics of International Relations: Essays in Criticism and Appreciation, edited by Bliddal, Henrik, Sylvest, Casper, and Wilson, Peter. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. 2011. “Gilpinian Realism and International Relations.” International Relations 25 (4):499–511.Google Scholar
Wolf, Jason B. et al., eds. 2000. Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold. 1940. Britain and France between Two Wars: Conflicting Strategies of Peace Since Versailles. Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold. 1962. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Womack, Brantly. 2012. “Asymmetry and China’s Tributary System.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (1):37–54.Google Scholar
Wood, James B. 1996. The King’s Army: Warfare, Soldiers, and Society during the Wars of Religion in France, 1562–1576. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodburn, James. 1968. “Stability and Flexibility in Hadza Residential Groupings.” In Man the Hunter, edited by Lee, Richard B. and DeVore, Irven. Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Woodburn, James. 1979. “Minimal Politics: The Political Organization of the Hadza of North Tanzania.” In Politics in Leadership: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Shack, William A. and Cohen, Percy S.. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Woodburn, James. 1988. “African Hunter-Gatherer Social Organization: Is It Best Understood as a Product of Encapsulation?” In Hunters and Gatherers 1: History, Evolution, and Social Change, edited by Ingold, Tim, Riches, David, and Woodburn, James. Berg.Google Scholar
Woodburn, James. 1998. “‘Sharing is Not a Form of Exchange’: An Analysis of Property-Sharing in Immediate-Return Hunter-Gatherer Societies.” In Property Relations: Renewing the Anthropological Tradition, edited by Hann, C. M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodburn, James. 2005. “Egalitarian Societies Revisited.” In Property and Equality: Ritualisation, Sharing, Egalitarianism, edited by Widlok, Thomas and Tadesse, Wolde Gossa. Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Woodward, James. 2004. “Counterfactuals and Causal Explanation.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):41–72.Google Scholar
Woodward, James. 2016. “Causation and Manipulability.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/causation-mani/.Google Scholar
Woodward, James and Ross, Lauren. 2021. “Scientific Explanation.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/scientific-explanation/.Google Scholar
Wootton, David, ed. 2003. Divine Right and Democracy: An Anthology of Political Writing in Stuart England. Hackett.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. 2010. “Oliver Cromwell and the Protectorate.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 20:57–83.Google Scholar
Wright, Cory and Bechtel, William. 2007. “Mechanisms and Psychological Explanation.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Psychology and Cognitive Science, edited by Thagard, Paul. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wright, Justin P. and Jones, Clive G.. 2006. “The Concept of Organisms as Ecosystem Engineers Ten Years On: Progress, Limitations, and Challenges.” BioScience 56 (3):203–209.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. 1930. Research in International Relations since the War. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Wu, Zhengyu. 2018. “Classical Geopolitics, Realism and the Balance of Power Theory.” Journal of Strategic Studies 41 (6):786–823.Google Scholar
Xavier, Joana C. et al. 2020. “Autocatalytic Chemical Networks at the Origin of Metabolism.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 287 (1922):20192377.Google Scholar
Yan, Xuetong. 2011. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yeung, Henry Wai‐chung. 2005. “Rethinking Relational Economic Geography.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (1):37–51.Google Scholar
Yin, Yian et al. 2021. “Coevolution of Policy and Science during the Pandemic.” Science 371 (6525):128–130.Google Scholar
Ylikoski, Petri. 2012. “Micro, Macro, and Mechanisms.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science, edited by Kincaid, Harold. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yoffee, Norman. 2005. Myths of the Archaic State: Evolution of the Earliest Cities, States and Civilizations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, John R. 2001. “The Scottish Parliament and European Diplomacy 1641–1647: The Palatine, The Dutch Republic and Sweden.” In Scotland and the Thirty Years’ War: 1618–1648, edited by Murdoch, Steve. Brill.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1994. International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 2017. Governing Complex Systems: Social Capital for the Anthropocene. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zahle, Julie. 2016. “Methodological Holism in the Social Sciences.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/holism-social/.Google Scholar
Zaks, Sherry. 2016. “The Logic of Process Tracing: Contributions, Pitfalls and Future Directions.” In Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Political Science, edited by Keman, Hans and Woldendorp, Jaap J.. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2017b. “Theorizing Hierarchies: An Introduction.” In Hierarchies in World Politics, edited by Zarakol, Ayse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeleny, Milan. 1977. “Self-Organization of Living Systems.” International Journal of General Systems 4 (1):13–28.Google Scholar
Zeleny, Milan, ed. 1980. Autopoiesis, Dissipative Structures, and Spontaneous Social Orders. American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Zhang, Feng. 2012. “The Tsinghua Approach and the Inception of Chinese Theories of International Relations.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (1):73–102.Google Scholar
Zhang, Feng. 2014. “International Societies in Pre-modern East Asia: A Preliminary Framework.” In Contesting International Society in East Asia, edited by Buzan, Barrry and Zhang, Yongjin. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shiming. 2006. “A Historical and Jurisprudential Analysis of Suzerain–Vassal State Relationships in the Qing Dynasty.” Frontiers of History in China 1 (1):124–157.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongjin and Buzan, Barry. 2012. “The Tributary System as International Society in Theory and Practice.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (1):3–36.Google Scholar
Zielonka, Jan. 2006. Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zielonka, Jan. 2013. “The International System in Europe: Westphalian Anarchy or Medieval Chaos?” Journal of European Integration 35 (1):1–18.Google Scholar
Zimmern, Alfred E. 1936. The League of Nations and the Rule of Law, 1918–1935. 2nd ed. Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
Zmora, Hillay. 1991. Monarchy, Aristocracy and the State in Europe 1300–1800. Routledge.Google Scholar
Zorzi, Andrea. 2000. “The ‘Material Constitution’ of the Florentine Dominion.” In Florentine Tuscany: Structures and Practices of Power, edited by Connell, William J. and Zorzi, Andrea. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zurn, Michael, Buzan, Barry, and Albert, Mathias. 2013. “Conclusion: Differentiation Theory and World Politics.” In Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory, edited by Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zurn, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zutshi, P. N. R. 2000. “The Avignon Papacy.” In The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume VI c. 1300–c. 1415, edited by Jones, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zwolski, Kamil. 2016. “How to Explain the Transnational Security Governance of the EU?” In International Relations Theory and European Security: We Thought We Knew, edited by Cladi, Lorenzo and Locatelli, Andrea. Routledge.Google Scholar