Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:53:22.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2019

Edited by
Pieter de Wilde ,
Ruud Koopmans ,
Wolfgang Merkel ,
Oliver Strijbis  and
Michael Zürn
Pieter de Wilde
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Ruud Koopmans
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Wolfgang Merkel
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Oliver Strijbis
Affiliation:
Universitat Zurich
Michael Zürn
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Struggle Over Borders
Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism
 , pp. 249 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alber, J. (1985) ‘Modernisierung, neue Spannungslinien und die politischen Chancen der Grünen’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 26: 211–26.Google Scholar
Andeweg, R. B. (2003) ‘Beyond Representativeness? Trends in Political Representation’, European Review 11(2): 147–61. doi:10.1017/S1062798703000164.Google Scholar
Anheier, H., Glasius, M. and Kaldor, M. (eds.) (2001) Global Civil Society. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Archibugi, D. (2004) ‘Cosmopolitan Democracy and its Critics: A Review’, European Journal of International Relations 10(3): 437–73.Google Scholar
Archibugi, D. (2008) The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Towards Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Archibugi, D. (2010) ‘The Architecture of Cosmopolitan Democracy’, in Brown, G. W. and Held, D. (eds.), The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 312–33.Google Scholar
Archibugi, D. and Held, D. (eds.) (1995) Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Azmanova, A. (2011) ‘After the Left–right (Dis)continuum: Globalization and the Remaking of Europe’s Ideological Geography’, International Political Sociology 5: 384–407.Google Scholar
Bale, T. (2003) ‘Cinderella and Her Ugly Sisters: The Mainstream and Extreme Right in Europe’s Bipolarising Party Systems’, West European Politics 26(3): 67–90.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. N. and Finnemore, M. (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. (2005) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. (2007) ‘The Class Cleavage: Conceptual and Methodological Framework’, in Bartolini, S. (ed.), The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–53.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2002) Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter: Neue weltpolitische Ökonomie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Becker, U. and Schwartz, H. (2005) Employment ‘Miracles’: A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Swiss, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US. Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Beisheim, M., Dreher, S., Walter, G., Zangl, B. and Zürn, M. (1999) Im Zeitalter der Globalisierung? Thesen und Daten zur gesellschaftlichen und politischen Denationalisierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (1979) ‘Bounded Morality: Justice and the State in World Politics’, International Organization 33(3): 405–24.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (1990) Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (1994) ‘Cosmopolitan Liberalism and the States System’, in Brown, C. (ed.), Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 123–36.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (2004) ‘Human Rights and the Law of Peoples’, in Chatterjee, D. K. (ed.), The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy. Cambridge University Press pp. 193–216.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. R. (2009) The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, C. (1993) ‘Future Hypothesis: A Concert of Powers?’ in Leaver, R. and Richardson, J. L. (eds.), Charting the Post-Cold War Order. Boulder, CO: Westview Press pp. 110–20.Google Scholar
Bellah, R. N. (1967) Civil Religion in America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (2007) Another Cosmopolitanism, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. and Entman, R. M. (eds.) (2001) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Best, H. (2012) ‘Elite Foundations of European Integration: A Causal Analysis’, in Best, H., Lengyel, G. and Verzichelli, L. (eds.), The Europe of Elites: A Study into the Europeanness of Europe’s Political and Economic Elites. Oxford University Press, pp. 208–33.Google Scholar
Best, H., Lengyel, G. and Verzichelli, L. (2012) The Europe of Elites: A Study into the Europeanness of Europe’s Political and Economic Elites. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Betz, H.-G. (1994) Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P. and Zelli, F. (eds.) (2012) Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binder, M. and Heupel, M. (2014) ‘The Legitimacy of the UN Security Council: Evidence from Recent General Assembly Debates’, International Studies Quarterly 59(2): 238–50.Google Scholar
Borg, I. and Groenen, P. J. F. (2005) Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bornschier, S. (2010) Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Börzel, T. A. (2005) ‘Mind the Gap! European Integration between Level and Scope’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(2): 217–36. doi:10.1080/13501760500043860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, D., Beckfield, J. and Zhao, W. (2007) ‘The Consequences of Economic Globalization for Affluent Democracies’, Annual Review of Sociology 33(1): 313–34. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131636.Google Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R. and Golder, M. (2006) ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82.Google Scholar
Burgoon, B. (2010) ‘Betwixt and Between? The European Union’s Redistributive Management of Globalization’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(3): 433–48.Google Scholar
Burley, A.-M. and Mattli, W. (1993) ‘Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’, International Organization 47(1): 41–76.Google Scholar
Busing, F. M. T. A., Groenen, P. J. F. and Heiser, W. J. (2005) ‘Avoiding Degeneracy in Multidimensional Unfolding by Penalizing on the Coefficient of Variation’, Psychometrika 70(1): 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busing, F. M. T. A., Heiser, W. J. and Cleaver, G. (2010) ‘Restricted Unfolding: Preference Analysis with Optimal Transformations of Preferences and Attributes’, Food Quality and Preference 21: 82–92.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C. (2002a) ‘Imagining Solidarity: Cosmopolitanism, Constitutional Patriotism, and the Public Sphere’, Political Culture 14(1): 141–71.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C. (2002b) ‘The Class Consciousness of Frequent Travelers: Toward a Critique of Actually Existing Cosmopolitanism’, The South Atlantic Quarterly 101(4): 869–97.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C. (2003) ‘The Class Consciousness of Frequent Travellers: Towards a Critique of Actually Existing Cosmopolitanism’, in Archibugi, D. (ed.), Debating Cosmopolitics. London: Verso pp. 86–116.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2005) Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, E. G. and Stimson, J. A. (1989) Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. (2006) ‘Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 34(2): 147–75.Google Scholar
Coser, L. A. (1957) ‘Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change’, British Journal of Sociology 8(3): 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. (1989) Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1999) ‘Can International Organizations be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View’, in Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (eds.), Democracy’s Edges. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1959) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (2005) The Crisis of Democracy: In Conversation with Antonio Polito. London: Gibson Square Books.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (1984) ‘Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, The Journal of Politics 46(1): 264–84. doi:10.2307/2130444.Google Scholar
Dambrun, M., Kamiejski, R., Haddadi, N. and Duarte, S. (2009) ‘Why Does Social Dominance Orientation Decrease with University Exposure to the Social Sciences? The Impact of Institutional Socialization and the Mediating Role of “Geneticism”’, European Journal of Social Psychology 39(1): 88–100.Google Scholar
De Lange, S. L. (2007) ‘A New Winning Formula?’ Party Politics 13(4): 411–35. doi:10.1177/1354068807075943.Google Scholar
De Wilde, P. (2011a) ‘Ex Ante vs. Ex Post: The Trade-off Between Partisan Conflict and Visibility in Debating EU Policy-formulation in National Parliaments’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(5): 672–89.Google Scholar
De Wilde, P. (2011b) ‘No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration’, Journal of European Integration 33(5): 559–75.Google Scholar
De Wilde, P. and Zürn, M. (2012) ‘Can the Politicization of European Integration Be Reversed?’ Journal of Common Market Studies 50(S1): 137–53.Google Scholar
De Wilde, P., Koopmans, R. and Zürn, M. (2014) ‘The Political Sociology of Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism: Representative Claims Analysis’, WZB Discussion Papers, SP IV 2014/102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2014/iv14-102.pdf.Google Scholar
Deegan-Krause, K. (2013) ‘Full and Partial Cleavages’, in Berglund, S., Ekman, J., Deegan-Krause, K. and Knutsen, T. (eds.), The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, 3rd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 35–50.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K. W. (1961) ‘Social Mobilization and Political Development’, American Political Science Review 100(4): 678–9.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K. W. (1968) Analysis of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dinan, D. (1999) Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Dinas, E. (2012) ‘Left and Right in the Basque Country and Catalonia: The Meaning of Ideology in a Nationalist Context’, South European Society and Politics 17(3): 467–85. doi:10.1080/13608746.2012.701898.Google Scholar
Dreher, A., Gaston, N. and Martens, P. (2008) Measuring Globalization: Gauging Its Consequences. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2011) ‘Cosmopolitan Politicization: How Perceptions of Interdependence Foster Citizens’ Expectations in International Institutions’, European Journal of International Relations 18(3): 481–508.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. (1966) Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eribon, D. (2013) Returning to Reims. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985) Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esteban, J.-M. and Ray, D. (1994) ‘On the Measurement of Polarization’, Econometrica 62(4): 819–51.Google Scholar
Esteban, J.-M. and Ray, D. (1999) ‘Conflict and Distribution’, Journal of Economic Theory 87(2): 379–415.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1998) The Essential Communitarian Reader. Lanham, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
European Parliament (2004) ‘Future of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’, 13 October 2004, Brussels, E. Parliament, Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament (2008) ‘Freedom, Security and Justice (annual debate) (Articles 2 and 39 TEU)’, PV 31/01/2008–4, Brussels, www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEX.Google Scholar
Fischer, M., Kauder, B., Potrafke, N. and Ursprung, H. W. (2016) ‘Support for Free-Market Policies and Reforms: Does the Field of Study Influence Students’ Political Attitudes?’ [online], European Journal of Political Economy, retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268016300672.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. (2008) Euro-Clash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flockhart, T. (2005) ‘Critical Junctures and Social Identity Theory: Explaining the Gap between Danish Mass and Elite Attitudes to Europeanization’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 43(2): 251–71. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00554.x.Google Scholar
Flora, P. (ed.) (2000) Stein Rokkan: Staat, Nation und Demokratie in Europa. Die Theorie Stein Rokkans aus seinen gesammelten Werken. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Flora, P., Kuhnle, S. and Urwin, D. W. (eds.) (1999) State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2011) The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (1992) ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, in Calhoun, C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–42.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (2009) Scales of Justice. Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Frieden, J. A. (1991) ‘Invested Interests: the Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance’, International Organization 45(4): 425–51.Google Scholar
Gabel, M. (1998a) ‘Economic Integration and Mass Politics: Market Liberalization and Public Attitudes in the European Union’, American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 936–53.Google Scholar
Gabel, M. (1998b) ‘Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories’, The Journal of Politics 60(2): 333–54. doi:10.2307/2647912.Google Scholar
Goodhart, D. (2004) ‘Too Diverse’, Prospect (February 20, 2004), retrieved 28 September 2017 from www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/too-diverse-david-goodhart-multiculturalism-britain-immigration-globalisation.Google Scholar
Goodhart, D. (2017) The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics. London: C. Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable: A Re-Analysis of Our Social Responsibilities. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grant, R. W. and Keohane, R. O. (2005) ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’, American Political Science Review 99(1): 29–43.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. (2007) ‘The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe’, Political Studies 35: 607–28.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1986) Politik, Kunst, Religion: Essays über zeitgenössische Philosophen. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1991[1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. B. (1987) ‘The Elements of the Concept of Ideology’, Political Studies 35(1): 18–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1987.tb00186.x.Google Scholar
Haus, M. (2003) Kommunitarismus – Einführung und Analyse. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L. and Tierney, M. J. (eds.) (2006) Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heideking, J. (2000) ‘Generalversammlung’, in Volger, H. (ed.), Lexikon der Vereinten Nationen. Munich: Oldenbourg, pp. 178–83.Google Scholar
Helbling, M. and Teney, C. (2015) ‘The Cosmopolitan Elite in Germany: Transnationalism and Postmaterialism’, Global Networks 15(4): 446–68. doi:10.1111/glob.12073.Google Scholar
Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitical Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Held, D. (2004) Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Held, D. (2010) ‘Principles of Cosmopolitan Order’, in Brown, G. W. and Held, D. (eds.), The Cosmopolitan Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 229–47.Google Scholar
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations. Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hellwig, T. (2015) Globalization and Mass Politics: Retaining the Room to Maneuver. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks, C. M. (2009) ‘The Democratic Soup: Mixed Meanings of Political Representation in Governance Networks’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 22(4): 689–715.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, K. and Dalton, R. J. (1978) ‘The New Politics’, in Kaase, M. and von Beyme, K. (eds.), Elections and Parties. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 69–96.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1972) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hiscox, M. J. (2001) ‘Class Versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade’, International Organization 55(1): 1–46. doi:10.1162/002081801551405.Google Scholar
Hix, S. (2005) The Political System of the European Union, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hix, S., Noury, A. and Roland, G. (2006) ‘Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament’, American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 494–511.Google Scholar
Höffe, O. (1999) Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Lange, U. (2007) ‘Studying Elite vs Mass Opinion’, in Donsbach, W. and Traugott, M. W. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 53–63.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. (2009) ‘Legislation, Delegation and Implementation under the Treaty of Lisbon: Typology meets Reality’, European Law Journal 15(4): 482–505.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (ed.) (1993) Kommunitarismus – Eine Debatte über die moralischen Grundlagen moderner Gesellschaften. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000409.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2014) ‘Delegation and Pooling in International Organizations’, Review of International Organizations, online first: doi:10.1007/s11558-014-9194-4:1–24.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Wilson, C. J. (2002) ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?’, Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 965–89.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Wilson, C. J. (2004) ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?’, in Marks, G. and Steenbergen, M. R. (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–40.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Niedzwiecki, S., Chapman Osterkatz, S. and Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016) Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, vol. 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999) ‘Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives’, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1): 1–55.Google Scholar
Hutter, S. (2014) Protesting Culture and Economics in Western Europe: New Cleavages in Left and Right Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Igarashi, H. and Saito, H. (2014) ‘Cosmopolitanism as Cultural Capital: Exploring the Intersection of Globalization, Education and Stratification’, Cultural Sociology, March. doi:10.1177/1749975514523935.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. F. (1970) ‘Cognitive Mobilization and European Identity’, Comparative Politics 3(1): 45–70. doi:10.2307/421501.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. F., Rabier, J.-R. and Reif, K. (1987) ‘The Evolution of Public Attitudes toward European Integration: 1970-1986’, Journal of European Integration 10(2–3): 135–55. doi:10.1080/07036338708428902.Google Scholar
Janssen, J. I. H. (1991) ‘Postmaterialism, Cognitive Mobilization and Public Support for European Integration’, British Journal of Political Science 21(4): 443–68. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006256.Google Scholar
Katz, R. S. and Mair, P. (1995) ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics 1(1): 5–28. doi:10.1177/1354068895001001001.Google Scholar
Keane, J. (2003) Global Civil Society. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks Beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1925) Allgemeine Staatslehre. Enzyklopädie der Rechts- und Sozialwissenschaften, 23. Bd. Berlin: J. Springer.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, O. (1965) ‘Der Wandel des westeuropäischen Parteiensystems’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 6(1): 20–41.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. P. (1988) ‘Left-Libertarian Parties: Explaining Innovation in Competitive Party Systems’, World Politics 40(2): 194–234. doi:10.2307/2010362.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. P. (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. P. (1995) Party Systems in East Central Europe: Consolidation or Fluidity? Studies in Public Policy, 241. Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. P. and Hellemans, S. (1990) ‘The Left–right Semantics and the New Politics Cleavage’, Comparative Political Studies 23(2): 210–38.Google Scholar
Knutsen, O. (1995) ‘Value Orientations, Political Conflicts and Left–Right Identification: A Comparative Study’, European Journal of Political Research 28(1): 63–93.Google Scholar
Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2011) ‘Fuzzy Citizenship in Global Society’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 20(4): 456–80.Google Scholar
Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2012) ‘Global Democracy and Domestic Analogies’, in Archibugi, D., Koenig-Archibugi, M. and Marchetti, R. (eds.), Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, pp. 160–82.Google Scholar
Kohut, A., Keeter, S., Doherty, C., Dimock, M. and Leah, C. (2012) Assessing the Representativeness of Public Opinion Surveys. Washington DC: The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R. (2007) ‘Who Inhabits the European Public Sphere? Winners and Losers, Supporters and Opponents in Europeanised Political Debates’, European Journal of Political Research 46(2): 183–210.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R. and Erbe, J. (2004) ‘Towards a European Public Sphere? Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions of Europeanized Political Communication’, Innovation 17(2): 97–118.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R. and Statham, P. (1999) ‘Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches’, Mobilization: An International Quarterly 4(2): 203–21.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R. and Statham, P. (2010) The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, R., Stathan, P., Giugni, M. and Passy, F. (2005) Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Social movements, protest, and contention, vol. 25. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. and Frey, T. (2008) ‘The United Kingdom: Moving Parties in a Stable Configuration’, in Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T., West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–207.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2008) ‘Globalization and Its Impact on National Spaces of Competition’, in Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T., West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S. and Wüest, B. (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2010) ‘The Rise and Fall of Multiculturalism? New Debates on Inclusion and Accommodation in Diverse Societies’, International Social Science Journal 61(199): 97–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2451.2010.01750.x.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (2005) On Political Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lake, D. A. (2010) ‘Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance’, International Studies Quarterly 54: 587–613.Google Scholar
Lechner, F. J. and Boli, J. (2005) World Culture: Origins and Consequences. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Leonisio, R. and Strijbis, O. (2014) ‘Beyond Self-Placement: Why Nationalism Is a Better Predictor of Electoral Behaviour in the Basque Country’, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 146: 47–68.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1960) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Raab, E. (1970) The Politics of the Unreason: Right Wing Extremism in America, 1790–1970. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (1967) ‘Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction’, in Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (eds.) (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. and Bracken, C. C. (2002) ‘Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability’, Human Communication Research 28(4): 587–604.Google Scholar
Lord, C. and Tamvaki, D., (2013) ‘The Politics of Justification? Applying the “Discourse Quality Index” to the Study of the European Parliament’, European Political Science Review 5(1): 27–54.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1988) Whose Justice? Which Rationality? University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2005) ‘Cleavages’, in Katz, R. S. and Crotty, W. (ed.), Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 371–5.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2006) Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2003) ‘Rethinking Representation’, American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–28. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000856.Google Scholar
Margalit, Y. (2012) ‘Lost in Globalization: International Economic Integration and the Sources of Popular Discontent’, International Studies Quarterly 56(3): 484–500.Google Scholar
Marks, G. (2004) ‘Conclusion: European Integration and Political Conflict’, in Marks, G. and Steenbergen, M. (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–59.Google Scholar
Mattila, M. and Raunio, T. (2006) ‘Cautious Voters – Supportive Parties: Opinion Congruence Between Voters and Parties on the EU Dimension’, European Union Politics 7(4): 427–49. doi:10.1177/1465116506069434.Google Scholar
May, J. D. (1973) ‘Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity’, Political Studies 21(2): 135–51.Google Scholar
McCoy, D. C. and Kim, H. Y. (2016) Latent Variable Analysis (Part I): Structural Equation Modeling, Harvard Graduate School of Education, retrieved from https://canvas.harvard.edu/courses/8737/Google Scholar
Meckled-Garcia, S. (2008) ‘On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency’, Journal of Political Philosophy 16(3): 245–71.Google Scholar
Merkel, W. (2004) ‘Embedded and Defective Democracies’, Democratization 11(5): 33–58.Google Scholar
Merkel, W. and Kneip, S. (eds.) (2018) Democracy and Crisis: Challenges in Turbulent Times. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
Merkel, W. and Scholl, F. (2018) ‘Illiberalism, Populism and Democracy in East and West’, Czech Journal of Political Science (XXV) 1: 28–44.Google Scholar
Milanović, B. (2016) Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. St. (1882) A System of Logic. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1995) On Nationality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2005) ‘The “End of Politics” and the Challenge of Right-Wing Populism’, in Panitza, F. (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, pp. 50–71.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2007) Über das Politische. Wider die kosmopolitische Illusion. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (English original: 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (2013) Agonistics: The World Politically. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (1999) ‘The Single-Issue Party Thesis: Extreme Right Parties and the Immigration Issue’, West European Politics 22(3): 182–97.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2004) ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition 39(4): 541–63.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2010) ‘The Populist Radical Right: A Pathological Normalcy’, West European Politics 33(6), retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/cas_mudde/26/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013) Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. and Swift, A. (1992) Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2016) Was ist Populismus? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (2005) ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 33(2): 113–47.Google Scholar
Niedermayer, O. and Sinnot, R. (eds.) (1990) Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2007) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Özbudun, E. (2014) ‘AKP at the Crossroads: Erdogan’s Majoritarian Drift’, South European Society and Politics 19(2): 155–67.Google Scholar
Pappi, F. U. (1973) ‘Parteiensystem und Sozialstruktur in der Bundesrepublik’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 14: 191–213.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. J. (2007) ‘General Assembly’, in Weiss, T. G. and Daws, S. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on the United Nations. Oxford University Press, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Petrocik, J. R. (1996) ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 825–50.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (1972) The Concept of Representation. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (1989) Realizing Rawls: Political Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (1992) ‘Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty’, Ethics 103(1): 48–75. doi:10.1086/293470.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2002) ‘Moral Universalism and Global Economic Justice’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1(1): 29–58.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1976) The Comparative Study of Political Elites. London: Pearson Education Canada.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2012) On Global Justice. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, T. (2000) ‘Let’s Argue: Communicative Action in World Politics’, International Organization 54(1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Risse, T. (2012) ‘Identity Matters: Exploring the Ambivalence of EU Foreign Policy’, Global Policy 3(s1): 87–95.Google Scholar
Risse, T., Ropp, S. C. and Sikkink, K. (2013) The Persistent Power of Human Rights. From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge Studies in International Relations, vol. 126. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rittberger, B. (2005) Building Europe’ Parliament: Democratic Representation beyond the Nation-State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. I. and Harris, J. (2000) ‘Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class’, Science & Society 64(1): 11–54.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2011) The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rogowski, R. (1989) Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1970) ‘The Growth and Structuring of Mass Politics in Western Europe: Reflections of Possible Models of Explanation’, Scandinavian Political Studies 5(A5): 65–83. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1970.tb00472.x.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S., Flora, P., Kuhnle, S. and Urwin, D. W. (1999) State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan: Based on His Collected Works. Comparative European Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. (1993) ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations’, International Organization 47(1): 139–74.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. J. (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. J. (1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, W. and Stone Sweet, A. (2004) ‘Law, Politics and International Governance’, in Reus-Smit, C. (ed.), The Politics of International Law. Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–71.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, A. (2008) ‘Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality’, Journal of Political Philosophy 16(2): 137–64.Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2010) The Representative Claim. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinegart and Winston.Google Scholar
Scheffer, P. (2011) Immigrant Nation. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Scheve, K. and Slaughter, M. J. (2004) ‘Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production’, American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 662–74. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00094.x.Google Scholar
Scheve, K. and Slaughter, M. J. (2004) ‘Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production’, American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 662–74.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2001) ‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’, International Organization 55(1): 47–80.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (2009) ‘Re-Presenting Representation’, Government and Opposition 44(4): 476–90.Google Scholar
Singer, P. W. (2002) ‘Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry and Its Ramifications for International Security’, International Security 26(3): 186–220.Google Scholar
Sklair, L. (2002) ‘The Transnational Capitalist Class and Global Politics: Deconstructing the Corporate-State Connection’, International Political Science Review 23(2): 159–74.Google Scholar
Sklair, L. (2012) ‘Transnational Capitalist Class’ [online], The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog585/abstract.Google Scholar
Sombart, W. (1906) Warum gibt es in den Vereinigten Staaten keinen Sozialismus? Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Spittler, M. (2018) ‘Are Right-Wing Populist Parties a Threat to Democracy?’ in Merkel, W. and Kneip, S. (eds.), Democracy and Crisis: Challenges in Turbulent Times. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 97–121.Google Scholar
Statham, P. and Trenz, H.-J. (2014) ‘Understanding the Mechanisms of EU Politicization: Lessons from the Eurozone Crisis’, Comparative European Politics 13(3): 287–306.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, M. R. and Marks, G. (2004) ‘Introduction: Models of Political Conflict in the European Union’, in Steenbergen, M. R. and Marks, G. (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (2012) The Price of Inequality. How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stolper, W. F. and Samuelson, P. A. (1941) ‘Protection and Real Wages’, The Review of Economic Studies 9(1): 58–73. doi:10.2307/2967638.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2017) ‘The Return of the Repressed as the Beginning of the End of Neoliberal Capitalism’, in Geiselberger, H. (ed.), The Great Regression. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 157–72.Google Scholar
Suvarierol, S. (2011) ‘Everyday Cosmopolitanism in the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(2): 181–200.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1992) The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. S. (1994) ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in Taylor, C., Multiculturalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–74.Google Scholar
Teney, C. and Helbling, M. (2014) ‘How Denationalization Divides Elites and Citizens’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 43(4): 258–71.Google Scholar
Teney, C., Strijbis, O., Carol, S. and Tepe, S. (2018) ‘Elite survey of the Bridging Project “The Political Sociology of Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism”. Technical Report’. WZB Discussion Paper, 1–67.Google Scholar
The Sun (2016) ‘Rage of the working class’, The Sun, 24 June 2016, retrieved from www.thesun.co.uk/news/1334368/rage-of-the-working-class/.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1993) Die europäischen Revolutionen. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
United Nations (2005) ‘5th Plenary Meeting’, Sixtieth Session, G. Assembly, A/60/PV.5, 15 September 2005, New York.Google Scholar
United Nations (2007) ‘63rd Plenary Meeting’, Sixty-second session, G. Assembly, A/62/PV.63, New York.Google Scholar
United Nations (2008) ‘10th Plenary Meeting’, Sixty-third session, G. Assembly, A/63/PV.10, New York.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. and Warren, M. E. (2008) ‘The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory’, Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 387–412. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533.Google Scholar
Viola, L. A., Snidal, D. and Zürn, M. (2015) ‘Sovereign (In)Equality in the Evolution of the International System’, in Leibfried, S., Huber, E., Lange, M., Levy, J., Nullmeier, F. and Stephens, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 221–237.Google Scholar
Voeten, E. (2000) ‘Clashes in the Assembly’, International Organization 54(2): 185–215.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1994) Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (2007) Thinking Politically: Essays in Political Theory. Binghamton: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Weenink, D. (2008) ‘Cosmopolitanism as a Form of Capital: Parents Preparing Their Children for a Globalizing World’, Sociology 42(6): 1089–106. doi:10.1177/0038038508096935.Google Scholar
Weßels, B. (1991) Erosion des Wachstumsparadigmas: Neue Konfliktstrukturen im politischen System der Bundesrepublik? Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Weßels, B. (1995) ‘Support for Integration: Élite or Mass-Driven’, Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance 2: 137–62.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (1998) Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Denationalisierung und Globalisierung als Chance, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2000) ‘Democratic Governance beyond the Nation State: The EU and Other International Organizations’, European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 183–221.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2011) ‘Perspektiven des demokratischen Regierens und die Rolle der Politikwissenschaft im 21. Jahrhundert’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 52(4): 603–35.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2014) ‘The Politicization of World Politics and Its Effects: Eight Propositions’, European Political Science Review 6(1): 47–71.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2015) ‘Survey Article: Four Models of a Global Order with Cosmopolitan Intent: An Empirical Assessment’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 24(1): 88–119.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2018) A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy & Contestation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. and Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (eds.) (2013) Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik: Umkämpfte internationale Institutionen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. and de Wilde, P. (2016) ‘Debating Globalization: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism as Political Ideologies’, Journal of Political Ideologies 21(3): 280–301. doi:10.1080/13569317.2016.1207741.Google Scholar
Zürn, M., Binder, M. and Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012) International Authority and Its Politicization. International Theory 4(1): 69–106.Google Scholar
Young, A. (2010) ‘Perspectives on the Changing Global Distribution of Power: Concepts and Context’, Politics 30(S1): 2–14.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×