Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Social work in extremis – disaster capitalism, ‘social shocks’ and ‘popular social work’
- one ‘Popular social work’ in the Palestinian West Bank: dispatches from the front line
- two Samidoun: grassroots welfare and popular resistance in Beirut during the 33-Day War of 2006
- three Grassroots community organising in a post-disaster context: lessons for social work education from Ilias, Greece
- four Grassroots community social work with the ‘unwanted’: the case of Kinisi and the rights of refugees and migrants in Patras, Greece
- five In search of emancipatory social work practice in contemporary Colombia: working with the despalzados in Bogota
- six Addressing social conflicts in Sri Lanka: social development interventions by a people's organisation
- seven International organisations, social work and war: a ‘frog's perspective’ reflection on the bird's eye view
- eight Welfare under warfare: the Greek struggle for emancipatory social welfare (1940–44)
- nine Social welfare services to protect elderly victims of war in Cyprus
- ten Worker's eye view of neoliberalism and Hurricane Katrina
- eleven Social work, social development and practice legitimacy in Central Asia
- Conclusion: Social work in extremis – some general conclusions
- References
- Index
four - Grassroots community social work with the ‘unwanted’: the case of Kinisi and the rights of refugees and migrants in Patras, Greece
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Social work in extremis – disaster capitalism, ‘social shocks’ and ‘popular social work’
- one ‘Popular social work’ in the Palestinian West Bank: dispatches from the front line
- two Samidoun: grassroots welfare and popular resistance in Beirut during the 33-Day War of 2006
- three Grassroots community organising in a post-disaster context: lessons for social work education from Ilias, Greece
- four Grassroots community social work with the ‘unwanted’: the case of Kinisi and the rights of refugees and migrants in Patras, Greece
- five In search of emancipatory social work practice in contemporary Colombia: working with the despalzados in Bogota
- six Addressing social conflicts in Sri Lanka: social development interventions by a people's organisation
- seven International organisations, social work and war: a ‘frog's perspective’ reflection on the bird's eye view
- eight Welfare under warfare: the Greek struggle for emancipatory social welfare (1940–44)
- nine Social welfare services to protect elderly victims of war in Cyprus
- ten Worker's eye view of neoliberalism and Hurricane Katrina
- eleven Social work, social development and practice legitimacy in Central Asia
- Conclusion: Social work in extremis – some general conclusions
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
In this chapter I reflect upon my engagement – as both a social worker and an activist – in the Kinisi movement, which has worked with refugees and migrants in Patras both to meet their needs and to campaign for political change in the way migrants and refugees are treated within the European Union (EU). I start by outlining the situation facing refugees in Greece, then proceed to look at the development of Kinisi, before reflecting on the role of social work in the campaign.
But before I proceed I want to highlight one ‘linguistic’ issue. In political debate a distinction is drawn between refugees, asylum seekers and migrants. Migrants are viewed as people who move for a job. Refugees are those who flee their home country because of political, religious or cultural oppression. An asylum seeker is someone who seeks formal recognition for their refugee status. But in reality, these distinctions are quite unhelpful and based on old and legalistic definitions. For example, if someone flees Afghanistan because they are a Communist facing persecution they would count as a legitimate ‘refugee’, but someone from the same country who left home because their village had been destroyed by imperialist intervention and they could no longer support themselves would be a migrant! Our view is that these distinctions are not helpful. The people with whom Kinisi works have fled countries destroyed by war and military intervention – we consider them all people who should have the right to free movement and the same human rights as everyone else. In what follows I refer to refugees, migrants and asylum seekers without distinction.
The EU's anti-immigration policy
The motto on the official website of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Border (Frontex) is ‘Libertas Securitas Justitia’ (Frontex, 2010). It has replaced one of the core demands of the French Revolution (equality) with one related to modern concerns (security). The three elements of the slogan, ‘freedom, equality, justice’, were seen for many years as interconnected. Interestingly, in contemporary Europe ‘equality’ has been sacrificed in the name of ‘safety’. This issue is in line with the dominant policies of the EU and the US, by which, in the name of ‘safety’, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have produced massive waves of displaced people.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Work in ExtremisLessons for Social Work Internationally, pp. 65 - 80Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2011