Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 January 2020
INTRODUCTION
“This has a whiff of August 1945. Somebody just used a new weapon and this weapon will not be put back in the box.”
That is how the former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and National Security Agency (NSA) director Michael Hayden referred to the computer virus StuxNet that silently accelerated a few hundred Iranian nuclear centrifuges leading to their self-destruction. Then the quintessential cyberwar scenario became reality in Ukraine in 2015 with the electricity blackout following the unprecedented hack of Ukraine's power grid. On top of that, WannaCry and NotPetya displayed across the globe the extent of the damage for people and infrastructure that malicious cyber-attacks can inflict.
Faced with widespread cyber-attacks and a deadlock in the global negotiations about international law and state responsible behaviour in cyberspace, the EU decided to develop its own framework to combat malicious cyber activities and build stronger cybersecurity. While the Union has foreseen some measures aimed at increased prevention and early warning mechanisms with regard to cyber-attacks, until recently it was lacking an appropriate framework for a joint EU diplomatic response to malicious cyber operations. And contrary to some Member States, which publicly attributed cyber-attacks, the EU has not taken any act of attribution or follow up with regard to potential perpetrators. Thus, the further development of a common and comprehensive approach on cyber diplomacy was necessary in order to contribute to the “mitigation of cybersecurity threats, conflict prevention and greater stability in international relations through the use of diplomatic and legal instruments”.
In 2016, the Dutch presidency submitted a Non-paper on “Developing a joint EU diplomatic response against coercive cyber operations”. This non-paper argues that while resilience and security of networks are essential for preventing certain cyber operations, broader response and a comprehensive use of a multitude of policy instruments may be required. The EU's reaction must be proportionate to the scope, scale and duration of an aggressive behaviour in cyberspace. The use of cyber diplomacy tools is meant to influence rational cost-benefit analysis of state and non-state actors carrying out cyber-attacks for politico-military purposes.
In June 2017, the Council continued its work on the issue and presented its draft conclusions on a Framework for a Joint EU Diplomatic Response to Malicious Cyber Activities.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.