Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:05:54.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Lydia White
Lydia White
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar , pp. 288 - 311
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adjémian, C. (1976). On the nature of interlanguage systems. Language Learning 26: 297–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikawa, T. (1999). Reflexives. In N. Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 154–90). Oxford: Blackwell
Aitchison, J. (1976). The articulate mammal. New York: Routledge
Archangeli, D. and T. Langendoen (eds.). (1997). Optimality Theory: an overview. Oxford: Blackwell
Bailey, N., Madden, C. and Krashen, S.. (1974). Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning?Language Learning 24: 235–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. L. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 533–81Google Scholar
Baker, C. L. and J. McCarthy (eds.). (1981). The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Baker, M. (1997). Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: handbook in generative syntax (pp. 73–137). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Balcom, P. (1997). Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research 13: 1st person–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, M. (1997). The morpho-syntax of nominal and verbal categories in Capeverdean Creole. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, Harvard University
Bard, E. G., Robertson, D. and Sorace, A.. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72: 32–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1987). Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language Learning 37: 385–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Beard, R. (1987). Morpheme order in a lexeme/morpheme-base morphology. Lingua 72: 1st person–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany: SUNY Press
Beck, M.-L. (1997). Viruses, parasites and optionality in L2 performance. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Michigan State University
Beck, M.-L. (1998a). L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 311–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, M.-L. (ed.). (1998b). Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Belletti, A. (1991). Generalized verb movement: aspects of verb syntax. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier
Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L.. (1988). Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S. (1994). Interpretation of English reflexives by adolescent speakers of Serbo-Croatian. Second Language Research 10: 125–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S. and L. Progovac. (1998). Morphological status of reflexives in second language acquisition. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 187–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Bernstein, J. (1993). Topics in the syntax of nominal structure across Romance. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, City University of New York
Berwick, R. and A. Weinberg. (1984). The grammatical basis of linguistic performance: language use and acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Bialystok, E. (1997). The structure of age: in search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13: 116–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. New York: Springer Verlag
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language 68: 706–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (ed.). (1999). Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case of systematicity. Language Learning 33: 1st person–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 20: 3rd person–49Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1996). Conservative pattern accumulation in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the European Second Language Association, Nijmegen
Bley-Vroman, R. (1997). Features and patterns in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Michigan State University
Bley-Vroman, R. and C. Chaudron. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In E. Tarone, S. Gass and A. Cohen (eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 245–61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S. and Ioup, G.. (1988). The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research 4: 1st person–32Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. and D. Masterson. (1989). Reaction time as a supplement to grammaticality judgements in the investigation of second language competence. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL 8.2: 207–37
Bley-Vroman, R. and N. Yoshinaga. (1992). Broad and narrow constraints on the English dative alternation: some fundamental differences between native speakers and foreign language learners. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL. 11: 157–99
Bloom, P. (ed.). (1994). Language acquisition: core readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Bobaljik, J. (To appear). Realizing Germanic inflection: why morphology does not drive syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics
Bobaljik, J. and Thráinsson, H.. (1998). Two heads aren't always better than one. Syntax 1st person: 37–71Google Scholar
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris
Borer, H. (1989). Anaphoric Agr. In O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 69–109). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Borer, H. (1996). Access to Universal Grammar: the real issues. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 718–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. and B. Rohrbacher. (1997). Features and projections: arguments for the full competence hypothesis. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes and A. Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 24–35). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Borer, H. and K. Wexler. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper and E. Williams (eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 123–72). Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRef
Brown, C. (1998). The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research 14: 136–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. (2000). The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 4–63). Oxford: Blackwell
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Bruhn-Garavito, J. (1995). L2 acquisition of verb complementation and Binding Principle B. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileman and R. Rutkowski Weber (eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 79–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Bruhn de Garavito, J. and L. White. (2000). L2 Acquisition of Spanish DPs: the status of grammatical features. In C. Howell, S. Fish and T. Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 164–75). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Bruhn de Garavito, J. and L. White. (2002). L2 acquisition of Spanish DPs: the status of grammatical features. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux and J. Liceras (eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: the L1/L2 connection (pp. 151–76). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: a government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel
Carroll, S. (1996). Parameter-setting in second language acquisition: explanans and explanandum. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 720–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. (1999). Input and SLA: adults' sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender. Language Learning 49: 37–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: the raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Carroll, S. and Meisel, J.. (1990). Universals and second language acquisition: some comments on the state of current theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 201–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstens, V. M. (1991). The morphology and syntax of determiner phrases in Kiswahili. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, UCLA
Carstens, V. M. (2000). Concord in Minimalist Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgements: a review of theory, methods and results. Language Learning 33: 343–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. and Sybesma, R.. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of noun phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behaviour. Language 35: 26–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon Books
Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell
Chomsky, N. (1981a). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris
Chomsky, N. (1981b). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 32–75). London: Longman
Chomsky, N. (1986a). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, N. (1986b). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger
Chomsky, N. (1991). Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 417–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, N. (1999). On the nature, use and acquisition of language. In T. Bhatia and W. Ritchie (eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 33–54). San Diego: Academic Press
Christie, K. (1992). Universal Grammar in the second language: an experimental study of the cross-linguistic properties of reflexives in English, Chinese and Spanish. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Delaware
Christie, K. and J. Lantolf. (1998). Bind me up bind me down: reflexives in L2. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 239–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Cinque, G. (1990). Types of A′ -Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: a crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Clahsen, H. (1988). Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition: a study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults. In S. Flynn and W. O'Neil (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 47–75). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Clahsen, H. (1990). The comparative study of first and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 135–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1990/1991). Constraints on parameter setting: a grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition 1st person: 361–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., S. Eisenbeiss and M. Penke. (1996). Lexical learning in early syntactic development. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 129–59). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Clahsen, H., S. Eisenbeiss and A. Vainikka. (1994). The seeds of structure: a syntactic analysis of the acquisition of Case marking. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Clahsen, H. and Hong, U.. (1995). Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: new evidence from reaction-time experiments. Second Language Research 11: 57–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., J. Meisel and M. Pienemann. (1983). Deutsch als Zweitsprache: der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Gunther Narr Verlag
Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P.. (1986). The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: a study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research 2nd person: 93–119Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P.. (1989). The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 5: 1st person–29Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. and M. Penke. (1992). The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: new evidence on German child language from the Simone-corpus. In J. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement (pp. 181–224). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Clahsen, H., Penke, M. and Parodi, T.. (1993/1994). Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 395–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. and Roberts, I.. (1993). A computational approach to language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 299–345Google Scholar
Cole, P. (1987). Null objects in Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 597–612Google Scholar
Cole, P., Hermon, G. and Sung, L.-M.. (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 1st person–22Google Scholar
Cook, V. (1988). Chomsky's Universal Grammar: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Cook, V. (1990). Timed comprehension of binding in advanced L2 learners of English. Language Learning 40: 557–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research 7: 103–17Google Scholar
Cook, V. (1997). Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 34: 35–49Google Scholar
Cook, V. and M. Newson. (1996). Chomsky's Universal Grammar: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language 63: 544–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5: 161–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. and R. Thornton. (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: a guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Davies, W. and Kaplan, T.. (1998). Native speaker vs. L2 learner grammaticality judgements. Applied Linguistics 19: 183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (1999). Creolization, language change, and language acquisition: a prologomenon. In M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. and Anderson, B.. (1997). The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: the process-result distinction in English-French interlanguage grammars. Language Acquisition 6: 297–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. and Anderson, B.. (1998). Interlanguage A-bar dependencies: binding construals, null prepositions and Universal Grammar. Second Language Research 14: 341–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K. (1994). On the ‘underspecification’ of functional categories. In B. Lust, M. Suñer and J. Whitman (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 1: Heads, projections and learnability (pp. 119–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Dresher, E. (1999). Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 27–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, E. and Kaye, J.. (1990). A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition 34: 137–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
du Plessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L. and White, L.. (1987). UG or not UG, that is the question: a reply to Clahsen and Muysken. Second Language Research 3rd person: 56–75Google Scholar
Duffield, N. and White, L.. (1999). Assessing L2 knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: converging methodologies. Second Language Research 15: 133–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, N., White, L., Bruhn de Garavito, J., Montrul, S. and Prévost, P.. (2002). Clitic placement in L2 French: evidence from sentence matching. Journal of Linguistics38.3Google Scholar
Dulay, H. and Burt, M.. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24: 37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. (1994). Local and long-distance anaphora in second-language acquisition. In E. Tarone, S. Gass and A. Cohen (eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 207–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Ellis, R. (1990). Grammaticality judgments and learner variability. In H. Burmeister and P. Rounds (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Second Language Research Forum (pp. 25–60). American English Institute, University of Oregon
Emonds, J. (1978). The verbal complex V′ – V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 151–75Google Scholar
Epstein, S., Flynn, S. and Martohardjono, G.. (1996). Second language acquisition: theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 677–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S., S. Flynn and G. Martohardjono. (1998). The strong continuity hypothesis: some evidence concerning functional categories in adult L2 acquisition. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 61–77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Eubank, L. (1993). Sentence matching and processing in L2 development. Second Language Research 9: 253–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L. (1993/1994). On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 183–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L. (1994). Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 369–88). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Eubank, L. (1996). Negation in early German-English interlanguage: more valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research 12: 73–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L., Bischof, J., Huffstutler, A., Leek, P. and West, C.. (1997). ‘Tom eats slowly cooked eggs’: thematic-verb raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition 6: 171–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L. and S. Grace. (1998). V-to-I and inflection in non-native grammars. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in L2 knowledge (pp. 69–88). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Felix, S. (1986). Cognition and language growth. Dordrecht: Foris
Felix, S. (1988). UG-generated knowledge in adult second language acquisition. In S. Flynn and W. O'Neil (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 277–94). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Felix, S. and Weigl, W.. (1991). Universal Grammar in the classroom: the effects of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Second Language Research 7: 162–80Google Scholar
Ferdinand, A. (1996). The development of functional categories: the acquisition of the subject in French. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics
Fernández, E. (1999). Processing strategies in second language acquisition. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 217–39). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Fernández, E. (To appear). Bilingual sentence processing: relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Fillmore, C. (1968). A case for case. In E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston
Finer, D. (1991). Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 351–74). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Finer, D. and E. Broselow. (1986). Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding. In S. Berman, J.-W. Choe and J. McDonough (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16 (pp. 154–68). University of Massachusetts at Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Students Association
Flege, J. E. and Liu, S.. (2001). The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 527–52Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. and Liu, S.. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41: 78–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S. (1987). A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel
Flynn, S. (1996). A parameter-setting approach to second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 121–58). San Diego: Academic PressCrossRef
Flynn, S. and G. Martohardjono. (1994). Mapping from the initial state to the final state: the separation of universal principles and language-specific principles. In B. Lust, M. Suñer and J. Whitman (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 1: Heads, projections and learnability (pp. 319–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Fodor, J. D. (1994). How to obey the Subset Principle: binding and locality. In B. Lust, G. Hermon and J. Kornfilt (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 2: Binding, dependencies and learnability (pp. 429–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Fodor, J. D. (1998). Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 1st person–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. D. (1999). Learnability theory: triggers for parsing with. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 363–403). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Fodor, J., Fodor, J. D. and Garrett, M.. (1975). The psychological unreality of semantic representations. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 515–31Google Scholar
Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research 17: 213–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, S. and Forster, K.. (1985). The psychological status of overgenerated sentences. Cognition 19: 101–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuda, M. (1993). Head government and case marker drop in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 168–72Google Scholar
Fukui, N. and Speas, M.. (1986). Specifiers and projection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 128–72Google Scholar
Gass, S. (2001). Sentence matching: a reexamination. Second Language Research 17: 421–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavruseva, L. and D. Lardiere. (1996). The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L1 acquisition. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 225–36). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Gerbault, J. (1978). The acquisition of English by a five year old French speaker. Unpublished MA thesis, UCLA
Gess, R. and J. Herschensohn. (2001). Shifting the DP parameter: a study of anglophone French L2ers. In C. R. Wiltshire and J. Camps (eds.), Romance syntax, semantics and their L2 acquisition (pp. 105–19). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Gibson, E. and Wexler, K.. (1994). Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 407–54Google Scholar
Giorgi, A. and F. Pianesi. (1997). Tense and aspect: from semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition 1st person: 3rd person–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodluck, H. (1991). Language acquisition: a linguistic introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Green, G. (1974). Semantics and syntactic regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Gregg, K. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–81). San Diego: Academic PressCrossRef
Gregg, K. (2003). SLA theory construction and assessment. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRef
Grimshaw, J. (1981). Form, function and the language acquisition device. In C. L. Baker and J. McCarthy (eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Grimshaw, J. and Rosen, S. T.. (1990). Knowledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 187–222Google Scholar
Grondin, N. and White, L.. (1996). Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition 5: 1st person–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R. and Wilson, R.. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65: 205–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. (1965). Lexical structures in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland
Guasti, M. T. (1994). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: finite and non-finite verbs. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 1st person–40Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell
Haegeman, L. (1995). Root infinitives, tense and truncated structures. Language Acquisition 4: 205–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. (1996). Can UG and the L1 be distinguished in L2 acquisition?Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 728–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. (1992). The syntactic character of thematic structure. In I. Roca (ed.), Thematic structure: its role in grammar (pp. 107–44). Dordrecht: ForisCrossRef
Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 53–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Halle, M. and A. Marantz. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Hamilton, R. (1998). Underdetermined binding of reflexives by adult Japanese-speaking learners of English. Second Language Research 14: 292–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. (1991). The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 27–62Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (1998). The inaccessibility of formal features of functional categories in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Pacific Second Language Research Forum, Tokyo
Hawkins, R. (2000). Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 34: 75–90Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2001a). Second language syntax: a generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Hawkins, R. (2001b). The theoretical significance of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17: 345–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. and Chan, Y.-H. C.. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research 13: 187–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. (1997). L2 acquisition by a Turkish-speaking child: evidence for L1 influence. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes and A. Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 245–56). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Haznedar, B. (2001). The acquisition of the Inflection Phrase system in child L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 1st person–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. and B. D. Schwartz. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes and A. Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257–68). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Herschensohn, J. (2000). The second time round: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Hilles, S. (1991). Access to Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 305–38). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Hirakawa, M. (1990). A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research 6: 60–85Google Scholar
Hirakawa, M. (1995). L2 acquisition of English unaccusative constructions. In D. MacLaughlin and S. McEwen (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 291–302). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Hirakawa, M. (1999). L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs by speakers of English and Chinese. In K. Kanno (ed.), The acquisition of Japanese as a second language (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Hirakawa, M. (2000). Unaccusativity in second language Japanese and English. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, McGill University
Hirakawa, M. (2001). L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 221–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Treiman, R. and Schneiderman, M.. (1984). Brown and Hanlon revisited: mothers' sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. Journal of Child Language 11: 81–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T. and Hyams, N.. (1998). Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua 106: 81–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T., N. Hyams and M. Becker. (1999). The role of the specifier and finiteness in early grammar. In D. Adger, S. Pintzuk, B. Plunkett and G. Tsoulas (eds.), Specifiers: minimalist approaches (pp. 251–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hornstein, N. and D. Lightfoot (eds.). (1981). Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition. London: Longman
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–74Google Scholar
Hulk, A. (1991). Parameter setting and the acquisition of word order in L2 French. Second Language Research 7: 1st person–34Google Scholar
Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel
Hyams, N. (1992). The genesis of clausal structure. In J. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement (pp. 371–400). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Hyams, N. (1994). V2, null arguments and COMP projections. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 21–55). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Hyams, N. (1996). The underspecification of functional categories in early grammar. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 91–127). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Hyams, N. and K. Safir. (1991). Evidence, analogy and passive knowledge: comments on Lakshmanan. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 411–18). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Hyams, N. and Sigurjonsdottir, S.. (1990). The development of ‘long-distance anaphora’: a cross-linguistic comparison with special reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition 1st person: 57–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. and N. Abrahamsson. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRef
Iatridou, S. (1990). About Agrpreposition. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 551–7Google Scholar
Inagaki, S. (1997). Japanese and Chinese learners' acquisition of the narrow-range rules for the dative alternation in English. Language Learning 47: 637–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inagaki, S. (2001). Motion verbs with goal prepositional phrases in the L2 acquisition of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 153–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inagaki, S. (2002). Japanese learners' acquisition of English manner-of-motion verbs with locational/directional prepositional phrases. Second Language Research 18: 3rd person–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T. and Wexler, K.. (2002). Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research 18: 95–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S. and Lakshmanan, U.. (1998). Learnability, negative evidence, and the L2 acquisition of the English passive. Second Language Research 14: 62–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, R. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51: 639–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris
Jaeggli, O. and N. Hyams. (1988). Morphological uniformity and the setting of the null subject parameter. Proceedings of NELS 18 (pp. 238–53). University of Massachusetts at Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Students Association
Jaeggli, O. and K. Safir. (1989). The null subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 1–44). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Johnson, J. and Newport, E.. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition 39: 215–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A. (1996a). Learnability and the lexicon: theories and second language acquisition research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Juffs, A. (1996b). Semantics-syntax correspondences in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 12: 177–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A. (2000). An overview of the second language acquisition of links between verb semantics and morpho-syntax. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 187–227). Oxford: Blackwell
Juffs, A. and Harrington, M.. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 483–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A. and Harrington, M.. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning 46: 283–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanno, K. (1996). The status of a nonparameterized principle in the L2 initial state. Language Acquisition 5: 317–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanno, K. (1997). The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English speakers. Second Language Research 13: 265–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanno, K. (1998a). Consistency and variation in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 14: 376–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanno, K. (1998b). The stability of UG principles in second language acquisition. Linguistics 36: 1125–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanno, K. (1999). Case and the ECP revisited: reply to Kellerman and Yoshioka (1999). Second Language Research 16: 267–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katada, F. (1991). The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 287–313Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Kellerman, E., J. van Ijzendoorn and H. Takashima. (1999). Retesting a universal: the Empty Category Principle and learners of (pseudo)Japanese. In K. Kanno (ed.), The acquisition of Japanese as a second language (pp. 71–87). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Kellerman, E. and Yoshioka, K.. (1999). Inter- and intra-population consistency: a comment on Kanno (1998). Second Language Research 15: 101–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, M., B. Landau and C. Phillips. (1999). Cross-linguistic differences in children's syntax for locative verbs. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield and C. Tano (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 337–48). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Klein, E. (1993a). A problem for UG in L2 acquisition. Issues in Applied Linguistics 4: 33–56Google Scholar
Klein, E. (1993b). Toward second language acquisition: a study of null-prep. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Klein, E. (1995a). Evidence for a ‘wild’ L2 grammar: when prepositional phrases rear their empty heads. Applied Linguistics 16: 87–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, E. (1995b). Second versus third language acquisition: is there a difference?Language Learning 45: 419–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, E. (2001). (Mis)construing null prepositions in L2 intergrammars: a commentary and proposal. Second Language Research 17: 37–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, E. and G. Martohardjono. (1999). Investigating second language grammars: some conceptual and methodological issues in generative SLA research. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative perspective (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge
Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Lakshmanan, U. (1993/1994). ‘The boy for the cookie’ – some evidence for the nonviolation of the case filter in child second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 55–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakshmanan, U. (2000). Clause structure in child second language grammars. In A. Juffs, T. Talpas, G. Mizera and B. Burtt (eds.), Proceedings of GASLA IV (pp. 15–39). University of Pittsburgh Working Papers in Linguistics
Lakshmanan, U. and Selinker, L.. (1994). The status of Complementizer Phrase and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2 grammars of English. Second Language Research 10: 25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakshmanan, U. and Selinker, L.. (2001). Analysing interlanguage: how do we know what learners know?Second Language Research 17: 393–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, B. and L. Gleitman. (1985). Language and experience: evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Lantolf, J. (1990). Reassessing the null-subject parameter in second language acquisition. In H. Burmeister and P. Rounds (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Second Language Research Forum (pp. 429–52). American English Institute, University of Oregon
Lardiere, D. (1998a). Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research 14: 1st person–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1998b). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research 14: 359–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1998c). Parameter-resetting in morphology: evidence from compounding. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 283–305). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Lardiere, D. (1999). Suppletive agreement in second language acquisition. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield and C. Tano (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 386–96). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102–29). Oxford: Blackwell
Lardiere, D. and Schwartz, B. D.. (1997). Feature-marking in the L2 development of deverbal compounds. Journal of Linguistics 33: 327–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. and Schachter, J.. (1997). Sensitive period effects in binding theory. Language Acquisition 6: 333–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, Y.-K. I. (2001). The initial state of L3A: full transfer and failed features? In X. Bonch-Bruevich, W. Crawford, J. Hellerman, C. Higgins and H. Nguyen (eds.), The past, present and future of second language research: selected proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 55–75). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Levin, B. and M. Rappaport-Hovav. (1995). Unaccusativity: at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Liceras, J. (1986). Linguistic theory and second language acquisition. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag
Liceras, J. (1997). The then and now of L2 growing pains. In L. Díaz and C. Pérez (eds.), Views on the acquisition and use of a second language (pp. 65–85). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Liceras, J. and Díaz, L.. (2000). Triggers in L2 acquisition: the case of Spanish N-N compounds. Studia Linguistica 54: 197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1989). The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 12: 321–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1999a). Creoles and cues. In M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 431–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Lightfoot, D. (1999b). The development of language: acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell
Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 251–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRef
Lumsden, J. (1992). Underspecification in grammatical and natural gender. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 469–86Google Scholar
Lust, B. (1994). Functional projection of Complementizer Phrase and phrase structure parameterization: an argument for the strong continuity hypothesis. In B. Lust, M. Suñer and J. Whitman (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 1: Heads, projections and learnability (pp. 85–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Lust, B., S. Flynn and C. Foley. (1996). What children know about what they say: elicited imitation as a research tool for assessing children's syntax. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee and H. S. Cairns (eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax (pp. 55–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
MacLaughlin, D. (1996). Second language acquisition of English reflexives: is there hope beyond transfer. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 453–64). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
MacLaughlin, D. (1998). The acquisition of the morphosyntax of English reflexives by non-native speakers. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 195–226). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Manzini, R. and Wexler, K.. (1987). Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 413–44Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1995). The minimalist program. In G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program (pp. 349–82). Oxford: Blackwell
Martohardjono, G. (1993). Wh-movement in the acquisition of a second language: a crosslinguistic study of three languages with and without movement. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, Cornell University
Martohardjono, G. (1998). Measuring competence in L2 acquisition: commentary on Part II. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 151–7). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Martohardjono, G. and J. Gair. (1993). Apparent UG inaccessibility in second language acquisition: misapplied principles or principled misapplications? In F. Eckman (ed.), Confluence: linguistics, L2 acquisition and speech pathology (pp. 79–103). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Mazurkewich, I. (1984a). Dative questions and markedness. In F. Eckman, L. Bell and D. Nelson (eds.), Universals of second language acquisition (pp. 119–31). Rowley, MA: Newbury House
Mazurkewich, I. (1984b). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language Learning 34: 91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazurkewich, I. and White, L.. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition 16: 261–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDaniel, D., Cairns, H. S. and Hsu., J. R. (1990). Binding principle in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition 1st person: 121–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, D., C. McKee and H. S. Cairns. (1996). Methods for assessing children's syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Meador, D. J. E. Flege and MacKay, I.. (2000). Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3rd person: 55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In K. Hyltenstam and L. Obler (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss (pp. 13–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Meisel, J. (1991). Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language learning: some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 231–76). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Meisel, J. (1997). The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13: 227–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H. and Pienemann, M.. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3rd person: 109–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montalbetti, M. (1984). After binding: on the interpretation of pronouns. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT
Montrul, S. (2000). Transitivity alternations in L2 acquisition: toward a modular view of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 229–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2001a). Agentive verbs of manner of motion in Spanish and English as second languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 171–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2001b). First-language-constrained variability in the second-language acquisition of argument-structure-changing morphology with causative verbs. Second Language Research 17: 144–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. and R. Slabakova. (2001). Is native-like competence possible in L2 acquisition? Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Montrul, S. and R. Slabakova. (2002). Acquiring morphosyntactic and semantic properties of aspectual tenses in L2 Spanish. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux and J. Liceras (eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: the L1/L2 connection (pp. 113–49). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Montrul, S. and Slabakova, R.. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: an investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition25.3Google Scholar
Müller, N. (1998). UG access without parameter setting: a longitudinal study of (L1 Italian) German as a second language. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in L2 knowledge (pp. 115–63). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Müller, N. and Hulk, A.. (2000). Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3rd person: 227–44Google Scholar
Murphy, V. (1997). Level-ordering and dual-mechanisms as explanations of L2 grammars. In M. Hughes and A. Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 410–21). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Neeleman, A. and Weerman, F.. (1997). L1 and L2 word order acquisition. Language Acquisition 6: 125–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative systems of foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics 9: 115–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. and R. Aslin. (2000). Innately constrained learning: blending old and new approaches to language acquisition. In C. Howell, S. Fish and T. Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 1–21). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Noguchi, T. (1997). Two types of pronouns and variable binding. Language 73: 770–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, W. (1987). Principles of grammar and learning. Chicago: Chicago University Press
O'Grady, W. (1996). Language acquisition without Universal Grammar: a general nativist proposal for L2 learning. Second Language Research 12: 374–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, W. (1997). Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
O'Grady, W. (2003). The radical middle: nativism without Universal Grammar. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRef
Oshita, H. (1997). The unaccusative trap: L2 acquisition of English intransitive verbs. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Southern California
Oshita, H. (2000). What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: a corpus study of ‘passive’ unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research 16: 293–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional categories and parametric variation. London: Routledge
Papp, S. (2000). Stable and developmental optionality in native and non-native Hungarian grammars. Second Language Research 16: 173–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. and Genesee, F.. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: autonomous or interdependent. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 1st person–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parodi, T., Schwartz, B. D. and Clahsen, H.. (1997). On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 15: 1st person–43Google Scholar
Patkowski, M. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning 30: 440–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T. and W. Glass. (1997). OPC effects in the L2 acquisition of Spanish. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux and W. Glass (eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish. Vol. 1: Developing grammars (pp. 149–65). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Pérez-Leroux, A. T. and Glass, W.. (1999). Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research 15: 220–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T. and X. Li. (1998). Selectivity in the acquisition of complex noun phrase islands. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 148–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Peters, A. (1985). Language segmentation: operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: The theoretical issues (pp. 1029–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Phillips, C. (1995). Syntax at age two: cross-linguistic differences. In C. Schütze, J. Ganger and K. Broihier (eds.), Papers on language processing and acquisition. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26: 325–82
Phillips, C. (1996). Root infinitives are finite. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Arnitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 588–99). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Pica, P. (1987). On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In J. McDonough and B. Plunkett (eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society (pp. 483–500). University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow and Co
Platzack, C. (1986). The position of the finite verb in Swedish. In H. Haider and M. Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages (pp. 27–47). Dordrecht: ForisCrossRef
Platzack, C. (1996). The initial hypothesis of syntax: a minimalist perspective on language acquisition and attrition. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 369–414). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Platzack, C. and Holmberg, A.. (1989). The role of AGR and finiteness. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 43: 51–76Google Scholar
Poeppel, D. and Wexler, K.. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69: 1st person–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of Inflection Phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. (1997). Notes on clause structure. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: handbook in generative syntax (pp. 237–79). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Prévost, P. (1997). Truncation in second language acquisition. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, McGill University
Prévost, P. and L. White. (2000a). Accounting for morphological variation in L2 acquisition: truncation or missing inflection? In M.-A. Friedemann and L. Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax (pp. 202–35). London: Longman
Prévost, P. and White, L.. (2000b). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16: 103–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L. (1992). Relativized subject: long-distance reflexives without movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 671–80Google Scholar
Progovac, L. (1993). Long-distance reflexives: movement-to-Infl vs. relativized subject. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 755–72Google Scholar
Progovac, L. and P. Connell. (1991). Long-distance reflexives, Agr-subjects, and acquisition. Paper presented at the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell
Radford, A. (1997). Syntactic theory and the structure of English: a minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Reinhart, T. and Reuland, E.. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720Google Scholar
Rice, K. and P. Avery. (1995). Variability in a deterministic model of language acquisition: a theory of segmental acquisition. In J. Archibald (ed.), Phonological acquisition and phonological theory (pp. 23–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Ritchie, W. and T. Bhatia (eds.). (1999). Handbook of child language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press
Ritter, E. (1991). Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew. In S. Rothstein (ed.), Syntax and Semantics (pp. 37–62). San Diego: Academic Press
Ritter, E. (1992). Cross-linguistic evidence for number phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, E. (1993). Where's gender?Linguistic Inquiry 24: 795–803Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris
Rizzi, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–57Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge: MIT Press
Rizzi, L. (1993/1994). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: the case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 371–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1994). Early null subjects and root null subjects. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 151–76). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Rizzi, L. (2000). Remarks on early null subjects. In M.-A. Friedemann and L. Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax: studies in comparative developmental linguistics (pp. 269–92). London: Longman
Rizzi, L. and Roberts, I.. (1989). Complex inversion in French. Probus 1st person: 1st person–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research 16: 135–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. and A. Sorace. (1999). Losing the V2 constraint. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 317–61). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Rochette, A. (1988). Semantic and syntactic aspects of Romance sentential complementation. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT
Roeper, T. and J. de Villiers. (1992). Ordered decisions in the acquisition of wh-questions. In J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck and T. Roeper (eds.), Theoretical issues in language acquisition: continuity and change in development (pp. 191–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Roeper, T. and J. Weissenborn. (1990). How to make parameters work: comment on Valian. In L. Frazier and J. de Villiers (eds.), Language processing and language acquisition (pp. 147–62). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Rohrbacher, B. (1994). The Germanic VO languages and the full paradigm: a theory of V to I raising. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Rohrbacher, B. (1999). Morphology-driven syntax: a theory of V to I raising and pro-drop. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT
Rumelhart, D. E. and M. J. L. (1987). Learning the past tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 195–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT
Sawyer, M. (1996). L1 and L2 sensitivity to semantic constraints on argument structure. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 646–57). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Schachter, J. (1988). Second language acquisition and its relationship to Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics 9: 219–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J. (1989). Testing a proposed universal. In S. Gass and J. Schachter (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 73–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Schachter, J. (1990). On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 6: 93–124Google Scholar
Schachter, J. (1996). Maturation and the issue of Universal Grammar in L2 acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 159–93). New York: Academic Press
Schachter, J. and Yip, V.. (1990). Grammaticality judgments: why does anyone object to subject extraction?Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 379–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J. (2000). Direct object scrambling and clitic placement: syntax and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Schütze, C. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Schütze, C. and K. Wexler. (1996). Subject case-licensing and English root infinitives. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 670–81). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Schwartz, B. D. (1987). The modular basis of second language acquisition. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Southern California
Schwartz, B. D. (1990). Un-motivating the motivation for the fundamental difference hypothesis. In H. Burmeister and P. Rounds (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Second Language Research Forum (pp. 667–84). American English Institute, University of Oregon
Schwartz, B. D. (1991). Conceptual and empirical evidence: a response to Meisel. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 277–304). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and ‘linguistic behavior’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 147–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1997). On the basis of the Basic Variety. Second Language Research 13: 386–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1998a). On two hypotheses of ‘Transfer’ in L2A: minimal trees and absolute L1 influence. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 35–59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Schwartz, B. D. (1998b). The second language instinct. Lingua 106: 133–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. and Eubank, L.. (1996). What is the ‘L2 initial state’?Second Language Research 12: 1st person–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. and Gubala-Ryzak, M.. (1992). Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: against negative evidence causing unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research 8: 1st person–38Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. and R. Sprouse. (1994). Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 317–68). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Schwartz, B. D. and Sprouse, R.. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. and R. Sprouse. (2000a). The use and abuse of linguistic theory in L2 acquisition research. In A. Juffs, T. Talpas, G. Mizera and B. Burtt (eds.), Proceedings of GASLA IV (pp. 176–87). University of Pittsburgh Working Papers in Linguistics
Schwartz, B. D. and R. Sprouse. (2000b). When syntactic theories evolve: consequences for L2 acquisition research. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 156–86). Oxford: Blackwell
Schwartz, B. D. and A. Tomaselli. (1990). Some implications from an analysis of German word order. In W. Abraham, W. Kosmeijer and E. Reuland (eds.), Issues in Germanic syntax (pp. 251–74). Berlin: Walter de GruyterCrossRef
Schwartz, B. D. and S. Vikner. (1996). The verb always leaves Inflection Phrase in V2 clauses. In A. Belletti and L. Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and functional heads: essays in comparative syntax (pp. 11–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10: 209–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sells, P. (1984). The syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Slabakova, R. (2000). L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native speakers. Linguistics 38: 739–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2001). Telicity in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Smith, N. and I.-M. Tsimpli. (1995). The mind of a savant. Oxford: Blackwell
Snow, C. and M. Hoefnagel-Hohle. (1978). Age differences in second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (ed.), Second language acquisition: a book of readings. Rowley, MA: Newbury House
Snyder, W. (1995a). Language acquisition and language variation: the role of morphology. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT
Snyder, W. (1995b). A neo-Davidsonian approach to resultatives, particles and datives. In J. Beckman (ed.) Proceedings of NELS 25 (pp. 457–71). University of Massachusetts at Amherst, GLSA
Snyder, W., Senghas, A. and Inman, K.. (2002). Agreement morphology and the acquisition of noun-drop in Spanish. Language Acquisition 9: 157–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W. and Stromswold, K.. (1997). The structure and acquisition of English dative constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 281–317Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (1993a). Incomplete and divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research 9: 22–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (1993b). Unaccusativity and auxiliary choice in non-native grammars of Italian and French: asymmetries and predictable indeterminacy. Journal of French Language Studies 3rd person: 71–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In T. Bhatia and W. Ritchie (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Sorace, A. (1999). Initial states, end-states and residual optionality in L2 acquisition. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield and C. Tano (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 666–74). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Sorace, A. (2000). Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of near-native L2 speakers. In C. Howell, S. Fish and T. Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 719–25). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Sorace, A. (2003). Optimality as a feature of L2 end-state grammars. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell
Sprouse, R. (1997). The acquisition of German and the ‘Initial Hypothesis of Syntax’: a reply to Platzack. In W. Abraham and E. van Gelderen (eds.), German: syntactic problems – problematic syntax (pp. 307–17). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer VerlagCrossRef
Sprouse, R. (1998). Some notes on the relationship between inflectional morphology and parameter setting in first and second language acquisition. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 41–67). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of phrase-structure. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT
Stromswold, K. (1996). Analyzing children's spontaneous speech. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee and H. S. Cairns (eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax (pp. 23–53). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Thiersch, C. (1978). Topics in German syntax. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT
Thomas, M. (1991a). Do second language learners have ‘rogue’ grammars of anaphora. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 375–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Thomas, M. (1991b). Universal Grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language 67: 211–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (1993). Knowledge of reflexives in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Thomas, M. (1994). Young children's hypotheses about English reflexives. In J. Sokolov and C. Snow (eds.), Handbook of research in language development using CHILDES (pp. 254–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Thomas, M. (1995). Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in Logical Form. Second Language Research 11: 206–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (1998). Binding and related issues in second language acquisition: commentary on Part III. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 261–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Thráinsson, H. (1996). On the (non-) universality of functional categories. In W. Abraham, S. Epstein, H. Thráinsson and J.-W. Zwart (eds.), Minimal ideas: syntactic studies in the minimalist framework (pp. 253–81). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Tiphine, U. (undated). The acquisition of English negation by four French children. University of Kiel
Trahey, M. (1996). Positive evidence in second language acquisition: some long term effects. Second Language Research 12: 111–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trahey, M. and White, L.. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 181–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, L. (1984). Parameters and effects of word order variation. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT
Travis, L. (1988). The syntax of adverbs. Special Issue on Comparative German Syntax. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics: 280–310Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M. and Roussou, A.. (1991). Parameter resetting in L2?, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3rd person: 149–69Google Scholar
Underhill, R. (1976). Turkish Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Vainikka, A. (1993/1994). Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 257–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A. and M. Young-Scholten. (1994). Direct access to X'-theory: evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 265–316). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Vainikka, A. and Young-Scholten, M.. (1996a). The early stages of adult L2 syntax: additional evidence from Romance speakers. Second Language Research 12: 140–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A. and Young-Scholten, M.. (1996b). Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research 12: 7–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A. and M. Young-Scholten. (1998). Morphosyntactic triggers in adult SLA. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Valian, V. (1990). Null subjects: a problem for parameter-setting models of language acquisition. Cognition 35: 105–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valois, D. (1991). The internal syntax of DP. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, UCLA
Verrips, M. and J. Weissenborn. (1992). Verb placement in early German and French: the independence of finiteness and agreement. In J. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition (pp. 283–331). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
Vikner, S. (1995). Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Vikner, S. (1997). V-to-I movement and inflection for person in all tenses. In L. Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax (pp. 189–213). London: Longman
Webelhuth, G. (1995). X-bar theory and case theory. Government and binding theory and the minimalist program (pp. 15–95). Oxford: Blackwell
Weissenborn, J. and B. Höhle (eds.). (2001). Approaches to bootstrapping: phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Werker, J. and Tees, R.. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behaviour and Development 7: 49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In D. Lightfoot and N. Hornstein (eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106: 23–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (1999). Maturation and growth of grammar. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 55–109). San Diego: Academic Press
Wexler, K. and R. Manzini. (1987). Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In T. Roeper and E. Williams (eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 41–76). Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRef
White, L. (1982). Grammatical theory and language acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris
White, L. (1985a). Is there a logical problem of second language acquisition?TESL Canada 2nd person: 29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1985b). The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 35: 47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1986). Implications of parametric variation for adult second language acquisition: an investigation of the ‘pro-drop’ parameter. In V. Cook (ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 55–72). Oxford: Pergamon Press
White, L. (1987a). Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics 8: 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1987b). Markedness and second language acquisition: the question of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 261–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1988). Island effects in second language acquisition. In S. Flynn and W. O'Neil (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 144–72). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef
White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
White, L. (1990). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 121–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1990/1991). The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 1st person: 337–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1991a). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7: 133–61Google Scholar
White, L. (1991b). Argument structure in second language acquisition. Journal of French Language Studies 1st person: 189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1992a). Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 273–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1992b). On triggering data in L2 acquisition: a reply to Schwartz and Gubala-Ryzak. Second Language Research 8: 120–37Google Scholar
White, L. (1992c). Subjacency violations and empty categories in L2 acquisition. In H. Goodluck and M. Rochemont (eds.), Island Constraints (pp. 445–64). Dordrecht: Kluwer
White, L. (1995a). Chasing after linguistic theory: how minimal should we be? In L. Eubank, L. Selinker and M. Sharwood Smith (eds.), The current state of interlanguage: studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (pp. 63–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
White, L. (1995b). Input, triggers and second language acquisition: can binding be taught? In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileman and R. Rutkowski Weber (eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 63–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
White, L. (1996a). Clitics in L2 French. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 335–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
White, L. (1996b). Universal grammar and second language acquisition: current trends and new directions. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 85–120). New York: Academic Press
White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition: from initial to final state. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 130–55): Blackwell
White, L. (2002). Morphological variability in endstate L2 grammars: the question of L1 influence. In A. Do, S. Fish, and B. Skarabela (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 758–68). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
White, L., C. Brown, J. Bruhn de Garavito, D. Chen, M. Hirakawa and S. Montrul. (1999). Psych verbs in second language acquisition. In G. Martohardjono and E. Klein (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 173–99). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef
White, L., Bruhn-Garavito, J., Kawasaki, T., Pater, J. and Prévost, P.. (1997). The researcher gave the subject a test about himself: problems of ambiguity and preference in the investigation of reflexive binding. Language Learning 47: 145–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. and Genesee, F.. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research 11: 233–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., Hirakawa, M. and Kawasaki, T.. (1996). Effects of instruction on second language acquisition of the Japanese long distance reflexive zibun. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 41: 235–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. and A. Juffs. (1998). Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of non-native language acquisition: competence and processing. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 111–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. and Ranta, L.. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics 12: 416–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., E. Valenzuela, M. Macgregor, Y.-K. I. Leung and H. Ben-Ayed. (2001). The status of abstract features in interlanguage grammars: gender and number in L2 Spanish. In A. H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez and A. Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 792–802). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Whong-Barr, M. and Schwartz, B. D.. (2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 579–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. (1981). Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1st person: 81–114Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1994). Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Williams, E. (1995). Theta theory. In G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program (pp. 99–124). Oxford: Blackwell
Yip, V. (1995). Interlanguage and learnability: from Chinese to English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Yoo, M., Y. Kayama, M. Mazzotta and L. White. (2001). Case drop in L2 Japanese. In A. H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez and A. Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 825–34). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press
Yuan, B. (1998). Interpretation of binding and orientation of the Chinese reflexive ziji by English and Japanese speakers. Second Language Research 14: 324–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, B. (2001). The status of thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese. Second Language Research 17: 248–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, L. and Langendoen, T.. (1985). Topic structures in Chinese. Language 61: 1st person–27Google Scholar
Zobl, H. (1989). Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In S. Gass and J. Schachter (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 203–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Zobl, H. and Liceras, J.. (1994). Functional categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning 44: 159–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, J.-W. (1993). Dutch syntax: a minimalist approach. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Groningen

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Lydia White, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Lydia White, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Lydia White, McGill University, Montréal
  • Book: Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065.012
Available formats
×