Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T00:47:02.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2022

Henrik Mouritsen
Henrik Mouritsen
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Roman Elite and the End of the Republic
The <i>Boni</i>, the Nobles and Cicero
 , pp. 305 - 318
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achard, G. 1973. ‘L’emploi de boni, boni cives, et de leurs formes superlatives dans l’action politique de Cicéron’, LEC 41: 207–21.Google Scholar
Achard, G. 1981. Pratique, rhétorique et idéologie dans les discours ‘optimates’ de Cicéron. Leiden.Google Scholar
Achard, G. 1990. ‘Le De Republica: une candidature deguisée’, Latomus 49: 370–82.Google Scholar
Akar, P. 2013. Concordia. Un idéal de laclasse dirigeante romaine à la fin de la république. Paris.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. C. 2002. The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Alföldy, G. 1985. The Social History of Rome. (1st ed. 1975).Google Scholar
André, J.-M. 1966. L’Otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle à Rome des origines à l’époque augustéenne. Paris.Google Scholar
Andreau, J. 1999. Banking and Business in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Andreau, J. and Coudry, M.. 2016. Le luxe et les lois somptuaires dans la Rome antique, eds. Andreau, J. and Coudry, M.. MEFRA 128.1.Google Scholar
Angius, A. 2018. La repubblica delle opinioni. Informazione politica e partecipazione popolare a Roma tra II e I secolo a.C. Milan.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1989. ‘Cicero on Stoic moral philosophy and private property’, in Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 151–73.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 2001. ‘The politician as public servant in Cicero’s De Re Publica’, in Cicéron et Philodeme: la polémique en philosophie, eds. Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D.. Paris: 109–28.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. 2000. ‘Cicero’, in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, eds. Rowe, C. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 477–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badel, C. 2005. La noblesse de l’empire romain. Les masques et la vertu. Champ Vallon, Seyssel.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1969. ‘Quaestiones Variae’, Historia 18: 447–91.Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1990. ‘The consuls, 179–49 BC’, Chiron 20: 371–413.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1960. ‘Auctoritas, dignitas, otium’, CQ 10: 43–50.Google Scholar
Baltrusch, E. 1989. Regimen morum. Die Reglementierung des Privatlebens der Senatoren und Ritter in der römischen Republik und frühen Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Bannon, C. J. 2000. ‘Self-help and social status in Cicero’s “Pro Quinctio”’, Ancient Society 30: 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baraz, Y. 2020. Reading Roman Pride. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barlow, C. T. 1980. ‘The Roman government and the Roman economy, 92–80 BC’, AJPh 101: 202–19.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. J. 2012. ‘Cicero on property and the state’, in Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, ed. Nicgorski, W.. Notre Dame, IN: 212–41.Google Scholar
Baroin, C. 2010. ‘Remembering one’s ancestors, following in their footsteps, being like them. The role and forms of family memory in the building of identity’, in Children, Memory, and Family Identity in Roman Culture, eds. Dasen, V. and Späth, T.. Oxford: 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastonsky, S. J. 1990. ‘Rich and poor: the great divide in ancient Rome and Victorian England’, Greece & Rome 37: 37–43.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. and Damon, C. 2006. Caesar’s Civil War. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, H. 2008. ‘Die Rolle des Adligen und die Krise der römischen Republik’, in Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik, ed. Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Munich: 53–71.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. 2005. Cives Epicurei: Les épicuriens et l’idée de monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave. Brussels.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. 1996. Cicero, Pro P. Sulla oratio. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. 1996. 2003. ‘Eqvester ordo tvvs est’: Did Cicero win his cases because of his support for the Equites?’, CQ 53: 222–34.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. 1996. 2020. Cicero’s Catilinarians. Oxford.Google Scholar
Biesinger, B. 2016. Römische Dekadenzdiskurse. Untersuchungen zur römischen Geschichtsschreibung und ihren Kontexten (2. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis 2. Jahrhundert n. Chr.), Historia Einzelschriften 242. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Billows, R. A. 2009. Julius Caesar. The Colossus of Rome. London, New York.Google Scholar
Bleicken, J. 1981. ‘Die Nobilität der römischen Republik’, Gymnasium 88: 236–53.Google Scholar
Bleicken, J. 1995. Cicero und die Ritter. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Blom, H. van der 2010. Cicero’s Role Models. The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. 2011. ‘Die Demilitarisierung der römischen Nobilität von Sulla bis Caesar’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana. Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J. Stuttgart: 55–80.Google Scholar
Blösel, W. 2016. ‘Provincial commands and money in the late Roman republic’, in Money and Power in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H., Jehne, M., and Serrati, J.. Coll. Latomus 355. Bruxelles: 68–81.Google Scholar
Bolkestein, H. 1939. Wohltätigkeit und Armenpflege im vorchristlichen Altertum: Ein Beitrag zum Problem ‘Moral und Gesellschaft’. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. 1941. ‘Cum dignitate otium’, REA 63: 172–91.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. 2000. The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bruhns, H. 1978. Caesar und die römische Oberschicht in den Jahren 49–44 v. Chr. Hypomnemata 55. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bruhns, H. 1980. ‘Ein politischer Kompromiss im Jahr 70 v. Chr.: die lex Aurelia iudiciaria’, Chiron 10: 263–72.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1971a. Italian Manpower (225 B.C. – A.D. 14). Oxford.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1971b. Social Conflicts in the Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1986. ‘Cicero’s officium in the civil war’, JRS 76: 12–32.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1988. The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burck, E. 1967. ‘Vom Sinn des Otium im alten Rom’, in Römische Wertbegriffe. Wege der Forschung 34, ed. Oppermann, H.. Darmstadt: 503–15.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, L. A. 1990. ‘The political elite of the Roman Republic: comments on recent discussion of the concepts “Nobilitas and Homo Novus”’, Historia 39: 77–99.Google Scholar
Burns, A. 1966. ‘Pompey’s strategy and Domitius’ stand at Corfinium’, Historia: 15: 74–95.Google Scholar
Cabe, R. W. 2002. ‘Cicero’s consular speeches’, in Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M. Leiden: 113–58.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. 2007. Caesar: The People’s Dictator. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Carcopino, J. 1947. Les secrets de la correspondence de Cicéron. Paris.Google Scholar
Cary, M. 1932. ‘Ch. XI: Rome in the absence of Pompey’, CAH 9: 475–505.Google Scholar
Chiavia, C. 2002. Programmata. Manifesti elettorali nella colonia romana di Pompei. Torino.Google Scholar
Chrissanthos, S. G. 2019. The Year of Julius and Caesar: 59 BC and the Transformation of the Roman Republic. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Christes, J. 1988. ‘Cum dignitate otium (Cic. Sest. 98) – eine Nachbereitung’, Gymnasium 95: 303–15.Google Scholar
Christopherson, A. J. 1989. ‘Invidia Ciceronis: Some political circumstances involving Cicero’s exile and return’, in Studia Pompeiana et Classica in Honor of Wilhelmina F. Jashemski, ed. R. I. Curtis. New York: vol. II 33–57.Google Scholar
Coffee, N. 2011. ‘Caesar Chrematopoios’, CJ 106: 397–421.Google Scholar
Collins, A. and Walsh, J.. 2015. ‘Debt deflationary crisis in the late Roman Republic’, Ancient Society 45: 125–70.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2007. The State of Speech. Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Cornwell, H. 2017. Pax and the Politics of Peace: Republic to Principate. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courrier, C. 2014. La plèbe de Rome et sa culture (fin du II siècle av. J.C.–fin du Ier siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome.Google Scholar
Courrier, C. 2017. ‘Plebeian culture in the city of Rome, from the late Republic to the early Empire’, in Popular Culture in the Ancient World, ed. Grig, L.. Cambridge: 107–28.Google Scholar
Craver, S. E. 2010. ‘Urban real estate in late republican Rome’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 55: 135–58.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W. 1984. M. Tullius Cicero: The Lost and Unpublished Orations. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W. 1994. M. Tullius Cicero: The Fragmentary Speeches. Atlanta. (2nd ed.)Google Scholar
Crawford, J. W. 2002. ‘The lost and fragmentary Orations’, in Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden: 305–30.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. 1974. Roman Republican Coinage. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. 1996. ed. Roman Statutes. London.Google Scholar
Dalfen, J. 2000. ‘Ciceros cum dignitate otium: einiges zur [nicht unproblematischen] Freizeitkultur grosser Römer’, in Otium-Negotium, ed. Sigot, E.. Vienna: 169–87.Google Scholar
Damon, C. 1997. The Mask of the Parasite: A Pathology of Roman Patronage. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. H. 1980. ‘Senators’ involvement in commerce in the late republic: Some Ciceronian evidence’, in The Seaborne Commerce of Ancient Rome: Studies in Archaeology and History, eds. D’Arms, J. H and Kopff, E. C. MAAR 36: 77–89.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. H. 1983. Commerce and Social Standing in Ancient Rome. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Dasen, V. 2010. ‘Wax and plaster memories. Children in elite and non-elite strategies’, in Children, Memory, and Family Identity in Roman Culture, eds. Dasen, V. and Späth, T.. Oxford: 109–46.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. 2019. A History of the Roman Equestrian Order. Cambridge.Google Scholar
De Ligt, L. and Garnsey, P., 2012. ‘The album of Herculaneum and a model of the town’s demography’, JRA 25: 69–94.Google Scholar
De Ligt, L. and Garnsey, P., 2016. ‘Migration in early-Imperial Italy: Herculaneum and Rome compared’, in Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire, eds. de Ligt, L. and Tacoma, L. E.. Leiden: 72–94.Google Scholar
Diehl, H. 1988. Sulla und seine Zeit im Urteil Ciceros. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Dondin-Payre, M. 1981. ‘Homo novus: un slogan de Caton à César’, Historia 30: 22–81.Google Scholar
Drexhage, R. 1989. ‘Tabulae novae, frumentationes und die stadtrömische plebs’, in Migratio et Commutatio: Studien zur alten Geschichte und deren Nachleben. Thomas Pekáry zum 60. Geburtstag am 13. September 1989 dargebracht von Freunden, Kollegen und Schülern, eds. Drexhage, H.-J and Sünskes, J.. St. Katharinen: 119–35.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford. 6–15Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 2004. ‘Cicero’s “Devotio”: The rôles of dux and scape-goat in his “Post reditum” rhetoric’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 102: 299–314.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 2010. A Commentary on Cicero, De legibus. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Earl, D. C. 1961. The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. 2020. ‘Non sunt composita mea verba. Reflected narratology in Sallust’s speech for Marius’, in Sallust, eds. Batstone, W. W and Feldherr, A.. Oxford: 316–39. (First published 2010.)Google Scholar
Elster, M. 2020. Die Gesetze der späten römischen Republik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. 2007. ‘The Sulpician law on debt: implications for the political elite and broader ramifications’, Acta Classica 50: 81–94.Google Scholar
Favory, F. 1976. ‘Classes dangereuses et crise de l’État dans le discours cicéronien d’après les écrits de Cicéron de 57 à 52’, in Texte, politique, idéologie: Cicéron. Besançon: 109–233.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 1980. ‘Les chevaliers romains sous la république’, REL 58: 313–37.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 1988. ‘Rogatio Servilia agraria’, Athenaeum 66: 141–64.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1973. The Ancient Economy. London.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1980. Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology. London.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1983. Politics in the Ancient World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fiori, R. 2008. ‘Fides et bona fides. Hiérarchie sociale et catégories juridiques’, Revue historique de droit français et étranger 86: 465–81.Google Scholar
Flaig, E. 2003. Ritualisierte Politik. Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fontanella, F. 2005. ‘La orazione De lege agraria: Cicerone e il senato di fronte alla riforma di P. Servilio Rullo (63 a.C)’, Athenaeum 93: 149–91.Google Scholar
Frazel, T. D. 2004. ‘The composition and circulation of Cicero’s In Verrem’, CQ 54: 128–42.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, M. W. 1966. ‘Caesar, Cicero and the problem of debt’, JRS 56: 128–44.Google Scholar
Frisch, H. 1946. Cicero’s Fight for the Republic. The Historical Background of Cicero’s Philippics. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Frier, B. W. 1977. ‘The rental market in early Imperial Rome’, JRS 67: 27–37.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. 1960. ‘Cum dignitate otium. Politisches Programm und Staatstheorie bei Cicero’, Gymnasium 67: 481–500.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. F. 2009. ‘The dictator’, in A Companion to Julius Caesar, ed. Griffin, M.. Malden: 57–71.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. D. A. 2007. Thinking about Property. From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. D. A. 2009. ‘Cicero on property’, in Agricoltura e scambi nell’Italia tardo-repubblicana, eds. Carlsen, J. and Lo Cascio, E.. Bari: 157–66.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. D. A. 2010. ‘Roman patronage’, in From the Tetrarchs to the Theodosians. Later Roman History and Culture, 284–450 CE, ed. McGill, S.. Cambridge: 33–54.Google Scholar
Gauthier, F. 2019. ‘Remarks on the existence of a senatorial property qualification in the Republic’, Historia 68: 285–301.Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. 1969, The Roman Nobility. Oxford. (1st German ed. 1912)Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2011. Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2020. ‘Frugalitas, or: The invention of a Roman virtue’, in Roman Frugality. Modes of Moderation from the Archaic Age to the Early Empire and Beyond, eds. Gildenhard, I. and Viglietti, C.. Cambridge: 237–346.Google Scholar
Giovannini, A. 1995. ‘Catilina et le problème des dettes’, in Leaders and Masses in the Roman World. Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavetz, eds. Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn, Z. W.. Leiden: 15–32.Google Scholar
Giovannini, A. 2010. ‘Cheval public et ordre équestre à la fin de la république’, Athenaeum 98: 353–64.Google Scholar
Goldmann, F. 2002. ‘Nobilitas als Status und Gruppe – Überlegungen zum Nobilitätsbegriff der römischen Republik’, in Res publica reperta. Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats (Festschrift Jochen Bleicken). Stuttgart: 45–66.Google Scholar
Gotter, U. 1996. Der Diktator ist tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des zweiten Triumvirats. Historia Einzelschriften 110. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. 2011. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. London.Google Scholar
Grilli, A. 1951. ‘Otium cum dignitate’, Acme 4: 227–40.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1974. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1980. ‘Review of Bruhns 1978’, Gnomon 52: 585–7.Google Scholar
Hanchey, D. 2013. ‘Otium as civic and personal stability in Cicero’s dialogues’, Classical World 106: 171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, K. and Scheidel, W.. 2018. ‘Roman slavery and the idea of “slave society”, in What Is a Slave Society? The Practice of Slavery in Global Perspective, eds. Lenski, N. and Cameron, C. M.. Cambridge: 86–105.Google Scholar
Harries, J. 2011. ‘Violating the principles of partnership: Cicero on Quinctius and Naevius’, in Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric, eds. Smith, C. and Covino, R.. Swansea: 127–43.Google Scholar
Hartmann, B. 2020. The Scribes of Rome. A Cultural and Social History of the Scribae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. 1924. ‘Ciceros Staat als politische Tendenzschrift’, Hermes 59: 73–94.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. 1963. Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris.Google Scholar
Henderson, M. I. 1963. ‘The establishment of the equester ordo’, JRS 53: 61–72.Google Scholar
Hillman, T. P. 1988. ‘Strategic reality and the movements of Caesar, January 49 BC’, Historia 37: 248–52.Google Scholar
Hinard, F. 1984. ‘La naissance du mythe de Sylla’, REL 62: 81–97.Google Scholar
Hinard, F. 1985. Les proscriptions de la Rome républicaine. Paris.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1993. ‘Conquest, competition and consensus: Roman expansion in Italy and the rise of the nobilitas’, Historia 42: 12–39.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2010. Reconstructing the Roman Republic. An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton, NJ. (1st German ed. 2004)Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2011. Die Entstehung der Nobilität. Stuttgart. (1st ed. 1987)Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2017. Libera res publica. Die politische Kultur des antiken Rom – Positionen und Perspektiven. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2020. Roman Republican Reflections. Studies in Politics, Power, and Pageantry. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Beck, H., eds. 2019. Verlierer und Aussteiger in der ‘Konkurrenz unter Anwesenden’. Agonalität in der politischen Kultur des antiken Rom. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1983. Death and Renewal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ioannatou, M. 2006. Affaires d’argent dans la correspondence de Cicéron. L’aristocratie sénatoriale face à ses dettes. Paris.Google Scholar
Jacotot, M. 2013. Question d’honneur: les notions d’honos, honestum et honestas dans la République romaine antique. Collection de l’École française de Rome, 479. Rome.Google Scholar
Jal, P. 1963. La guerre civile à Rome: étude littéraire et morale. Paris.Google Scholar
Jaczynowska, M. 1962. ‘The economic differentiation of the Roman nobility at the end of the republic’, Historia 11: 486–99.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2006. ‘Who attended Roman assemblies? Some remarks on political participation in the Roman Republic’, in Repúblicas y ciudadanos: modelos de participación cívica en el mundo antiguo, eds. Simón, F. M, Pina Polo, F., and Remesal Rodríguez, J.. Barcelona: 221–34.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2007. ‘Methods, models, and historiography’, in A Companion to the Roman Republic, eds. Morstein-Marx, R. and Rosenstein, N.. Malden: 3–28.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2016. ‘The senatorial economics of status in the late republic’, in Money and Power in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H., Jehne, M., and Serrati, J.. Coll. Latomus 355. Bruxelles: 188–207.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. 2017. ‘Why the anti-Caesarians failed: political communication on the eve of the Civil War (51 to 49)’, in Political Communication in the Roman World, ed. Rosillo, C.-López, . Leiden/Boston: 201–27.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L. 2008. ‘Redefining imagines: ancestor masks and political legitimacy in the rhetoric of new men’, Mouseion 8: 409–16.Google Scholar
Karataç, S. 2019. Zwischen Bitten und Bestechen. Ambitus in der politischen Kultur der römischen Republik – Der Fall des Cn. Plancius, Hermes Einzelschriften 115. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kaser, M. 1971. Das römische Privatrecht I. Munich. (2nd ed.)Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. 2006. Marcus Tullius Cicero. Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. 2020. Cicero. Brutus and Orator. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kay, P. 2014. Rome’s Economic Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. M. 1966. Roman Litigation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Knopf, F. 2018. Partizipationsmotive der plebs urbana im spätrepublikanischen Rom. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kurczyk, S. 2006. Cicero und die Inszenierung der eigenen Vergangenheit. Autobiographisches Schreiben in der späten Römischen Republik. Cologne.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. 2020. ‘The histories. The crisis of the Res Publica’, in Sallust, eds. Batstone, W. W. and Feldherr, A.. Oxford: 350–70. (1st Italian ed. 1968)Google Scholar
Lacey, W. K. 1961. ‘The tribunate of Curio’, Historia 10: 318–29.Google Scholar
Lacey, W. K. 1970. ‘Boni atque improbi’, Greece & Rome 17: 3–16.Google Scholar
Lapyrionok, R. 2008. Consensus bonorum omnium: Untersuchungen zur politischen Terminologie der späten römischen Republik. Bonn.Google Scholar
Leach, J. 1978. Pompey the Great. London.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, J. 1998/99. ‘Senat und Volk in Ciceros Reden “De lege agraria”’, Acta Classica Debrecen 34/35: 279–92.Google Scholar
Lepore, E. 1954. Il princeps ciceroniano e gli ideali politici della tarda repubblica. Naples.Google Scholar
Levick, B. 2015. Catiline. London.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 2015. ‘Ancient texts, contemporary stakes. J. Carcopino as reader of Cicero’s letters’, in Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Cicero, ed. Altman, W. H. F. Leiden/Boston: 198–212.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. G. 2006. Asconius. Commentaries on Speeches by Cicero. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 1992. Judicial Reform and Land Reform in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 1999. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 2008. Cicero as Evidence: A Historian’s Companion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Liu, J. 2017. ‘Urban poverty in the Roman Empire: material conditions’, in Paul and Economics: A Handbook, eds. Blanton, T. R and Pickett, R.. Minneapolis, MN: 23–54.Google Scholar
Livadiotti, U. 2017. La forza del nome. Identità politica e mobilitazione popolare nella Roma tardorepubblicana. Rome.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, E. 2016. ‘The impact of migration on the demographic profile of the city of Rome: A reassessment’, in Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire, eds. de Ligt, L. and Tacoma, L. E. Leiden: 23–32.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1995. ‘Cicero’s politics in the De officiis’, in Justice and Generosity. Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, eds. Laks, A. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 213–40.Google Scholar
Lott, J. B. 2015. ‘The earliest Augustan gods outside Rome’, CJ 110: 129–58Google Scholar
Lovano, M. 2002. The Age of Cinna: Crucible of the Republic, Historia Einzelschriften 158. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Luke, T. S. 2014. Ushering in a New Republic. Theologies of Arrival at Rome in the First Century BCE. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
MacRae, D. 2016. Legible Religion: Books, Gods, and Rituals in Roman Culture. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2007. Cicero, Philippics 3–9: Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2018. Cicero, Agrarian Speeches. Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Martin, P. M. 1980. ‘Cicéron “Princeps”’, Latomus 39: 850–78.Google Scholar
Märtin, S. 2012. Die politische Führungsschicht der römischen Republik im 2. Jh. v. Chr. zwischen Konformitätsstreben und struktureller Differenzierung. Trier.Google Scholar
McDermott, M. C. 1972. ‘Cicero’s publication of his consular orations’, Philologus 116: 277–84.Google Scholar
McDermott, M. C. 1977. ‘The Verrine jury’, RhM 120: 64–75.Google Scholar
McGushin, P. 1992. Sallust. The Histories, vol. I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mayer, E. 2012. The Ancient Middle Classes: Urban Life and Aesthetics in the Roman Empire, 100 BCE–250 CE. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Meier, C. 1965. ‘Populares’, RE suppl. 10: 549–615.Google Scholar
Meier, C. 1980. Res publica amissa. Frankfurt am Main. (1st ed. 1966)Google Scholar
Meier, C. 1982. Caesar. Berlin.Google Scholar
Meier, C. 1990. ‘C. Caesar Divi filius and the formation of the alternative in Rome’, in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, eds. Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M.. Berkeley, CA: 54–70.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. 1918. Caesars Monarchie und das Prinzipat des Pompejus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. N. 1979. Cicero. The Ascending Years. New Haven/London.Google Scholar
Moreau, P. 1980. ‘Cicéron, Clodius et la publication du Pro Murena’, REL 58: 220–37.Google Scholar
Morley, N. 2006. ‘The poor in the city of Rome’, in Poverty in the Roman World, eds. Atkins, M. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 21–39.Google Scholar
Morley, N. 2007. ‘Social structure and demography’, in A Companion to the Roman Republic, eds. Morstein-Marx, R. and Rosenstein, N.. Malden: 297–323.Google Scholar
Morley, N. 2008. ‘Das Altertum das sich nicht übersetzen lässt’: Translation and untrans latability in ancient history’, in Translation and the Classic: Identity as Change in the History of Culture, eds. Lanieri, A. and Zajko, V.. Oxford: 128–47.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2004. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 1988. Elections, Magistrates and Municipal Elite. Studies in Pompeian Epigraphy. Analecta Romana Instituti Danici Suppl. 15. Rome.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 1998. Italian Unification. A Study in Ancient and Modern Historiography. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Suppl. 70: London.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2001. Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2005. ‘Review of Morstein-Marx 2004’, JRS 95: 251–2.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2011a. ‘Lottery and elections: Containing elite competition in Venice and Rome’, in Competition in the Ancient World, eds. van Wees, H. and Fisher, N.. Cardiff: 221–38.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2011b. The Freedman in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2012. ‘Review of Mayer 2012’, BMCR 9: 40.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2013. ‘From meeting to text: The contio in the late Roman republic’, in Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and van der Blom, H.. Oxford: 63–82.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2014. ‘Pagane Lebensmodelle? Gods, pietas, and the Roman maiores’, in Der Mensch zwischen Weltflucht und Weltverantwortung. Lebensmodelle der paganen und der jüdisch-christlichen Antike, eds. Rühl, M. and Nesselrath, H.-G.. Tübingen: 47–62.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2015a. ‘Status and social hierarchies: The case of Pompeii’, in Social Status and Prestige in the Graeco-Roman World, ed. Kuhn, A.. Stuttgart: 87–114.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2015b. ‘Local elites in Italy and the Western Mediterranean’, in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy, eds. Bruun, C. and Edmondson, J.. Oxford: 227–49.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2017a. ‘Cicero’s familia urbana and the social structure of late republican Rome’, in Politische Kultur und soziale Struktur der Römischen Republik. Bilanzen und Perspektiven, eds. Harders, A.-C and Haake, M.. Stuttgart: 215–30.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2017b. Politics in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2019a. ‘From hostes acerrimi to homines nobilissimi. Two Studies in the Ancient Reception of the Social War’, Historia 68: 302–26.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2019b. ‘Slavery and manumission in Imperial Italy: The album from Herculaneum revisited’, in Popolazione, risorse e urbanizzasione nella Campania antica dall’età preromana alla tarda antichità, eds. Maiuro, M. and Balbo, A.. Bari: 211–31.Google Scholar
Nadjo, L. 1989. L’argent et les affaires à Rome des origines au IIe siècle avant. J. C. Étude d’un vocabulaire technique. Louvain/Paris.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1960. ‘Consul togatus: remarques sur le vocabulaire politique de Cicéron et de Tite-Live’, REL 38: 236–63.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1966. L’ordre équestre à l’époque républicaine (312-43 av. J.-C.), vol. 1. Paris.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1976. Tributum. Recherches sur la fiscalité directe sous la République romaine (Antiquitas 1 Abhandlungen zur alten Geschichte).Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1980. The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1984. ‘Augustus, government, and the propertied classes’, in Caesar Augustus. Seven Aspects, eds. Millar, F. and Segal, E.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1984. ‘Les ordres romains: définition, recrutement et fonctionnement’, in Des ordres à Rome, ed. Nicolet, C.. Paris: 7–21.Google Scholar
Nippel, W. 1995. Public Order in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. 2003. ‘Going round in circles: popular speech in ancient Rome’, Classical Antiquity 22: 135–76.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2006. Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Paananen, U. 1972. Sallust’s Politico-Social Terminology. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2011. The Consul at Rome: The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2012. ‘Veteres candidate: Losers in the elections in republican Rome’, in Vae victis! Perdedores en el mundo antiguo, eds. Marco Simón, F., Pina Polo, F., and Remesal Rodríguez, J.. Barcelona: 63–82.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2016. ‘Cupiditas pecuniae: wealth and power in Cicero’, in Money and Power in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H., Jehne, M., and Serrati, J.. Coll. Latomus 355: Bruxelles: 165–77.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. 2019. ‘Losers in the civil war between Caesarians and Pompeians. Punishment and survival’, in Verlierer und Aussteiger in der Konkurrenz unter Anwesenden. Agonalität in der politischen Kultur des antiken Rom, eds. Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Beck, H.. Stuttgart: 147–68.Google Scholar
Pleket, H. W. 2018. ‘Review of Social Status and Prestige in the Graeco-Roman World’, ed. A. Kuhn’, BABESCH 93: 274–7.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. 1994. ‘The rector rei publicae of Cicero’s De Republica’, SCI 13: 19–29.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. 2012. ‘Cicero’s De Re Publica and the virtues of the statesman’, in Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, ed. Nicgorski, W.. Notre Dame, IN: 14–42.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J. eds. 2004. Cicero. The Advocate. Oxford.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 1974. Dignitatis contentio. Studien zur Motivation und politischen Taktik im Bürgerkrieg zwischen Caesar und Pompeius. Vestigia 20. Munich.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 2011. ‘Peace as the highest end and good? The role of peace in Roman thought and politics’, in Fines imperii – imperium sine fine? Römische Okkupations- und Grenzpolitik im frühen Prinzipat, eds. Moosbauer, G. and Wiegels, R. Rahden/Westfalen: 323–38.Google Scholar
Rafferty, D. 2021. ‘Rural voters in Roman elections’, TAPA 151: 127–53.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. T. 2005. ‘Mark Antony’s judiciary reform and its revival under the Triumvirs’, JRS 95: 20–37.Google Scholar
Raskolnikoff, M. 1977. ‘La richesse et les riches chez Cicéron’, Ktema 2: 357–72.Google Scholar
Rauh, N. K. 1989a. ‘Finance and estate sales in Republican Rome’, Aevum: 45–76.Google Scholar
Rauh, N. K. 1989b. ‘Auctioneers and the Roman Economy’, Historia 38: 451–71.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. 1999. Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome. Austin.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. 2002. ‘The Post Reditum Speeches’, in Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. Leiden: 159–95.Google Scholar
Robb, M. A. 2010. Beyond populares and optimates. Political Language in the Late Republic. Historia Einzelschriften 213. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rollinger, C. 2009. Solvendi sunt nummi: Die Schuldenkultur der späten römischen Republik im Spiegel der Schriften Ciceros. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 2008. ‘Aristocrats and agriculture in the middle and late Republic’, JRS 98: 1–26.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 2009. ‘Aristocrats and agriculture in the late republic: the “high count”’, in Agricoltura e scambi nell’Italia tardo-repubblicana, eds. Carlsen, J. and Lo Cascio, E.. Bari: 243–57.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. 2011. ‘War, wealth and consuls’, in Consuls and Res Publica, ed. Beck, H.. Cambridge: 133–57.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C. 2016. ‘Cash is king: The monetization of politics and its economic consequences in the Late Roman Republic’, in Money and Power in the Roman Republic, eds. Beck, H., Jehne, M., and Serrati, J.. Coll. Latomus 355: Bruxelles: 26–36.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C. 2017a. ‘Informal conversations between senators in the late Roman Republic’, in Political Communication in the Roman World, ed. Rosillo-López, C.. Leiden/Boston. 34–51.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C. 2017b. Public Opinion and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C. 2019. ‘How did Romans perceive and measure public opinion?’, in Communicating Public Opinion in the Roman Republic, ed. C. Rosillo-López. Historia Einzelschriften 256. Stuttgart: 57–81.Google Scholar
Royer, J. P. 1967. ‘Le problème des dettes à la fin de la République romaine’, Revue historique du droit français et étranger 46: 191–240, 407–50.Google Scholar
Russell, A. 2016. The Politics of Public Space in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. 1982. Personal Patronage under the Early Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2006. ‘Sulla and the senate: a reconsideration’, Cahiers du Centre Gustave-Glotz 17: 7–22.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2016. ‘Performing passions, negotiating survival: Italian cities in the late republican civil wars’, in Civil War in Ancient Greece and Rome. Contexts of Disintegration and Reintegration, eds. Börm, H., Mattheis, M., and Wienand, J.. Stuttgart: 127–48.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2004. ‘Human mobility in Roman Italy, I: The free population’, JRS 94: 1–26.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2006. ‘Stratification, deprivation and quality of life’, in Poverty in the Roman World, eds. Atkins, M. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 40–59.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. and Friesen, S. J. 2009. ‘The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire’, JRS 99: 61–91.Google Scholar
Schiavone, A. 2000. The End of the Past. Ancient Rome and the Modern West. Cambridge, MA. (1st Italian ed. 1996).Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2007. ‘Lucretius and Roman politics and history’, in The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, eds. Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.. Cambridge: 41–58.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2021. Cicero. Political Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Scholz, P. 2011. Den Vätern folgen. Sozialisation und Erziehung der republikanischen Senatsaristokratie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schneider, H. 2011. ‘Atque nos omnia plura habere volumus – die Senatoren im Wirtschaftsleben der späten römischen Republik’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana. Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W. and Hölkeskamp, K.-J.. Stuttgart: 113–33.Google Scholar
Schulz, R. 2011. ‘Rapaces magistratus? – Die Möglichkeiten der Statthalter zur Ausbeutung der Provinzen in der späten römischen Republik’, in Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana. Prominenzrollen und Karrierefelder im antiken Rom, eds. Blösel, W and Hölkeskamp, K.-J. Stuttgart: 93–111.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 2002. Pompey the Great. Oxford. (1st ed. 1979)Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2009. ‘Epicureanism in the Roman Republic’, in The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J.. Cambridge: 29–45.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1960. ‘The Roman nobility in the second civil war’, CQ 10: 253–67.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1965–70. Letters to Atticus, 7 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1986. ‘Nobiles and Novi reconsidered’, AJPh 107: 255–60.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1991. Cicero. Back from Exile: Six Speeches upon His Return. Chicago.Google Scholar
Shatzman, I. 1975. Senatorial Wealth and Roman Politics. Coll. Latomus 142. Brussels.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 1975. ‘Debt in Sallust’, Latomus 34: 187–96.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature of the Wealth of Nations. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. J. 2006. The Roman Clan. The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E. 1958. Service in the Post-Marian Roman Army. Manchester.Google Scholar
Smith, T. 2021. ‘Elections in the time of Cinna’, Historia 70: 29–54.Google Scholar
Stemmler, M. 1997. Eques Romanus – Reiter und Ritter. Begriffsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu den Enstehungsbedingungen einer römischen Adelskategorie im Heer und in den comitia centuriata. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Stern, G. 2015. ‘The new cult of pax Augusta’, Acta Antiqua 55: 1–15.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2002–3. ‘Cicero’s Brutus. The end of oratory and the beginning of history?’, BICS 46: 195–211.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2005. Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome. London.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2013. ‘Pompeius, Helvius Mancia, and the politics of public debate’, in Oratory and Politics in the Roman Republic, eds. Steel, C. and Blom, H. van der. Oxford: 151–9.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2014a. ‘Rethinking Sulla: The case of the Roman senate’, CQ 64: 657–68.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2014b. ‘The Roman senate and the post-Sullan res publica’, Historia 63: 323–39.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. 2005. ‘Readings of Scipio’s dictatorship in Cicero’s De Re Publica 6.12’, CQ 55: 140–52.Google Scholar
Stone, A. M. 2005. ‘Optimates: An archaeology’, in Roman Crossings. Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic, eds. Welch, K. and Hillard, T. W.. Swansea: 39–94.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. 1939. ‘Optimates’, RE 18.1: 773–98.Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. 1956. Concordia ordinum. Eine Untersuchung zur Politik Ciceros. Amsterdam. (1st ed. 1931)Google Scholar
Stroh, W. 1975. Taxis und Taktik. Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. 2010. Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons: The Generation of the Text. Cambridge/New York.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Takahata, T. 1999. ‘Politik-Philosophie-Rhetorik in cum dignitate otium Ciceros’, Classical Studies 16: 60–97.Google Scholar
Tansey, P. 2017. A Selective Prosopographical Study of Marriage in the Roman Elite in the Second and First Centuries B.C.: Revisiting the Evidence. PhD thesis, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 2007. ‘Alterum est tamen boni viri, alterum boni petitoris: the good man canvasses’, Phoenix 61: 109–35.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 2018. Quintus Cicero. A Brief Handbook on Canvassing for Office. Oxford.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1948. Party Politics in the Age of Caesar. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Tempest, K. 2017. Brutus. The Noble Conspirator. New Haven/London.Google Scholar
Tiersch, C. 2018. ‘Political communication in the Late Roman Republic: Semantic battles between optimates and populares?’, in Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, Audience and Decision, eds. Blom, H. van der, Gray, C., and Steel, C.. Cambridge: 35–68.Google Scholar
Tröster, M. 2013. ‘Roman politics and whims of the crowd. The plebs contionalis revisited’, Latomus 72: 128–34.Google Scholar
Vanderbroeck, P. J. J. 1987. Popular Leadership and Collective Behavior in the Late Roman Republic (ca. 80–50 B.C.). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. 2009. ‘Cicero, domestic politics and the first action of the Verrines’, CA 28: 101–37.Google Scholar
Venturini, C. 1979. ‘Luxus e avaritia nell’opera di Sallustio’, Athenaeum 57: 276–92.Google Scholar
Verboven, K. 2002. The Economy of Friends. Economic Aspects of Amicitia and Patronage in the Late Republic. Brussels.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1979. ‘Mythe et réalité de l’autarchie à Rome’, REA 81: 262–80.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 2000. ‘La “plebe Moyenne” sous le Haut-Empire’, Annales (HSS) 55: 1169–99.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1989. ‘Patronage in Roman society: from Republic to Empire’, in Patronage in Ancient Society, ed. Wallace-Hadrill, A.. London/New York: 63–87.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2013. ‘Trying to define and identify the Roman “middle classes”’, JRA 26: 605–9.Google Scholar
Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und res publica. Zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Walter, U. 2013. Cicero. Zweite Rede an das Volk gegen den Volkstribunen Publius Servilius Rullus über das Ackergesetz. Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Ward, A. M. 1972. ‘Cicero’s fight against Crassus and Caesar in 65 and 63 B.C.’, Historia 21: 244–59.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. 1954. ‘Cicero’s cum dignitate otium: A reconsideration’, JRS 44: 1–13.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. 1961. ‘Avdaces: A study in political phraseology’, JRS 51: 12–22.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1970. ‘The definition of Eques Romanus in the Late Republic and Early Empire’, Historia 19: 67–83.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1971. New Men in the Roman Senate, 139 BC–14 AD. Oxford: 109–16.Google Scholar
Wood, N. 1983. ‘The economic dimension of Cicero’s political thought: Property and state’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 16: 739–56.Google Scholar
Wood, N. 1988. Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. 2014. ‘Marius speaks to the people: “New man”’, Roman nobility and Roman political culture’, SCI 33: 283–300.Google Scholar
Yavetz, Z. 1958. ‘The living conditions of the urban plebs’, Latomus 17: 500–17.Google Scholar
Yavetz, Z. 1963. ‘The failure of Catiline’s conspiracy’, Historia 12: 485–99.Google Scholar
Zanda, E. 2011. Fighting Hydra-Like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic. Bristol.Google Scholar
Zarecki, J. 2014. Cicero’s Ideal Statesman in Theory and Practice. London.Google Scholar
Zetzel, E. G. 1995. Cicero De Re Publica. Selections. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, R. 1990. The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Cape Town.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Henrik Mouritsen, King's College London
  • Book: The Roman Elite and the End of the Republic
  • Online publication: 15 December 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009180665.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Henrik Mouritsen, King's College London
  • Book: The Roman Elite and the End of the Republic
  • Online publication: 15 December 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009180665.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Henrik Mouritsen, King's College London
  • Book: The Roman Elite and the End of the Republic
  • Online publication: 15 December 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009180665.025
Available formats
×