Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T01:21:10.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Induced Abortion and Feticide

from Section 3 - Professionally Responsible Clinical Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2019

Laurence B. McCullough
Affiliation:
Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
John H. Coverdale
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Frank A. Chervenak
Affiliation:
Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides an ethical framework for offering, recommending, performing, and referring for induced abortion and feticide.

Counseling pregnant women about induced abortion and feticide presents the obstetrician with a distinct set of challenges., The American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have provided general guidance. Based on the ethical principles of beneficence and respect for autonomy in professional ethics in obstetrics and gynecology (see Chapter 2), this chapter provides practical, clinically comprehensive ethical guidance on when to offer, recommend, perform, and refer for abortion and feticide.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 515.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethically justified practical approach to offering, recommending, performing, and referring for induced abortion and feticide. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 560.e1–6.Google Scholar
American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 4.2.7. Abortion. Available at www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/abortion (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Available at www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Ethics/co390.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20181231T2040174286 (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar
Stedman’s Medical Dictionary. Available at online.statref.com/DictionaryHelp/DictionaryHelp (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 369. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 15111515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Campbell, S. Is third trimester abortion justified? Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 434435.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Campbell, S. Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough? Brit J Obstet Gynæcol 1999; 106: 293296.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Knapp, RC, Caputo, TA, Barber, HR. A clinically comprehensive ethical framework for offering and recommending cancer treatment before and during pregnancy. Cancer 2004; 100(2): 215222.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Sharma, G, Davis, J, Gross, S. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 19.e1–4.Google Scholar
Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Bayer, T. Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 169173.Google Scholar
Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA, Bayer, T, Weeks, S. Clinical implications of respect for autonomy in the psychiatric treatment of pregnant patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48: 209212.Google Scholar
McCullough, LB, Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 696702.Google Scholar
Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 659664.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The ethics of direct and indirect referral for termination of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 232.e1–232.e3.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Does obstetric ethics have any role to place in the obstetrician’s response to the abortion controversy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 14251429.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×