References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 January 2019
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pragmatism, Objectivity, and Experience , pp. 243 - 253Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alexander, T. M. (1987), John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience, and Nature: The Horizons of Feeling. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Avramides, A. (2001), “Davidson, Grice, and the Social Aspects of Language,” in Cosenza, G. (ed.) Paul Grice’s Heritage. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1960), “Introduction,” in Bernstein, R. J. (ed.) On Experience, Nature, and Freedom. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1961), “John Dewey’s Metaphysics of Experience,” Journal of Philosophy, 58: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1964), “Peirce’s Theory of Perception,” in Moore, E. C. and Robin, R. S. (eds.) Studies in the Philosophy of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1971), “The Challenge of Scientific Materialism,” in Rosenthal, D. (ed.) Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1992), “The Resurgence of Pragmatism,” Social Research, 59: 813–840.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1995), “American Pragmatism: The Conflict of Narratives,” in Saatkamp, H. J. Jr. (ed.) Rorty and Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (2007), “The New Pragmatists,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Review, 28: 3–38.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1962), “Dewey’s Philosophy of Language,” Journal of Philosophy, 59: 505–523.Google Scholar
Blattner, W. (2008), “What Heidegger and Dewey Could Learn from Each Other,” Philosophical Topics, 36: 57–78.Google Scholar
Boisvert, R. (1982), “Dewey, Subjective Idealism, and Metaphysics,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 18: 232–243.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice, trans. Nice, R.. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M. (2016), “Additive Theories of Rationality: A Critique,” European Journal of Philosophy, 24: 527–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. (1995), “Knowledge and the Social Articulation of the Space of Reasons,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55: 895–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. (1996), “Perception and Rational Constraint: McDowell’s Mind and World,” Philosophical Issues, 7: 241–259.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2000a), Articulating Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. (2000d), “Facts, Norms, and Normative Facts: A Reply to Habermas,” European Journal of Philosophy, 8: 356–374.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2002a), “The Centrality of Sellars’ Two-Ply Account of Observation to the Arguments of ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’,” in Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2002b), “Non-Inferential Knowledge, Perceptual Experience, and Secondary Qualities: Placing McDowell’s Empiricism,” in Smith, N. H. (ed.) Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2002c), “No Experience Necessary: Empiricism, Non-Inferential Knowledge, and Secondary Qualities,” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2010a), “Reply to Stout,” in Weiss, B. and Wanderer, J. (eds.) Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2010b), “Reply to McDowell,” in Weiss, B. and Wanderer, J. (eds.) Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2011a), Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2011b), “Linguistic Pragmatism and Pragmatism about Norms: An Arc of Thought from Rorty’s Eliminative Materialism to His Pragmatism,” in Brandom 2011a.Google Scholar
Bridges, J. (2006), “Davidson’s Transcendental Externalism,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73: 290–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodsky, G. (1969), “Absolute Idealism and Dewey’s Instrumentalism,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 5: 44–62.Google Scholar
Brown, M. (2012), “John Dewey’s Philosophy of Science,” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 2: 258–306.Google Scholar
Burke, T. (1991), Ecological Psychology and Dewey’s Theory of Perception, Report No. CSLI-91–151, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Burke, T. (1994), Dewey’s New Logic: A Reply to Russell. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (1985), “Possession of Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 85: 149–170.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (1986), “Conceptual Structure,” in Travis, Charles (ed.) Meaning and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (1993), “A Simple View of Color,” in Haldane, John J. and Wright, C. (eds.) Reality, Representation, and Projection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. and Cassam, Q. (2014), Berkeley’s Puzzle: What Does Experience Teach Us? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassam, Q. (2005), “Space and Objective Experience,” in Bermúdez, J. L. (ed.) Thought, Reference, and Experience: Themes from the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cobb-Stevens, R. (1974), James and Husserl: The Foundations of Meaning. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. R. (1940), “Some Difficulties in Dewey’s Anthropomorphic Naturalism,” Philosophical Review, 49: 196–228.Google Scholar
Cooke, E. (2011), “Phenomenology of Error and Surprise: Peirce, Davidson, and McDowell,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 47: 62–86.Google Scholar
Crowther, T. (2006), “Two Conceptions of Conceptualism and Nonconceptualism,” Erkenntnis, 65: 245–276.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1999), “Reply to Føllesdal,” in Hahn, L. E. (ed.) The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (2001a), Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (2001b), “Externalisms,” in Kotatko, P. and Kotatko, S. (eds.) Interpreting Davidson. Stanford, CA: CSLI Press.Google Scholar
DeVries, B. and Triplett, T. (2002), Knowledge, Mind, and the Given: Reading Wilfrid Sellars’ “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.” Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1969–1990), The Collected Works of John Dewey 1882–1953 (Early Works, Middle Works, and Late Works). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (2007), Essays in Experimental Logic. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (2010), “1897 Lecture on Hegel,” in Shook, J. R. and Good, J. A. (eds.) John Dewey’s Philosophy of Spirit. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Dicker, G. (1972), “John Dewey on the Object of Knowledge,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 8: 152–166.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2000), “A Merleau-Pontyian Critique of Husserl’s and Searle’s Representationalist Accounts of Action,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 100: 287–302.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2013), “The Myth of the Pervasiveness of the Mental,” in Schear, J. K. (ed.) Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Eilan, N. (1997), “Objectivity and the Perspective of Consciousness,” European Journal of Philosophy, 5: 235–250.Google Scholar
Eilan, N. (2007), “Consciousness, Self-consciousness and Communication,” in Baldwin, T. (ed.) Reading Merleau-Ponty: On Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eldridge, M. (1998), Transforming Experience: John Dewey’s Cultural Instrumentalism. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1985), “Things without the Mind,” in Collected Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1999), Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1986), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Girel, M. (2003), “The Metaphysics and Logic of Psychology: Peirce’s Reading of James’s Principles,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 39: 163–203.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2010), “Dewey, Continuity, and McDowell,” in De Caro, M. and Macarthur, D. (eds.) Naturalism and Normativity. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Good, J. A. (2006), A Search for Unity in Diversity: The “Permanent Hegelian Deposit” in the Philosophy of John Dewey. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Grimm, S. (2006), “Is Understanding a Species of Knowledge?,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57: 515–535.Google Scholar
Gubeljic, M., Link, S., Müller, P., and Osburg, G. (2000), “Nature and Second Nature in McDowell’s Mind and World,” in Willaschek, M. (ed.) John McDowell: Reason and Nature. Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, A. (1966a), “On the Object of Thought,” in Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, A. (1966b), “William James’s Theory of the ‘Transitive Parts’ of the Stream of Consciousness,” in Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Haugeland, J. (1998), “Objective Perception,” in Having Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
High, R. P. (1981), “Shadworth Hodgson and William James’s Formulation of Space Perception: Phenomenology and Perceptual Realism,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 17: 466–485.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, D. (2003), Beyond Realism and Anti-Realism: John Dewey and the Neo-Pragmatists. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, D. (ed.) (2014), Symposium: Language or Experience: Charting Pragmatism’s Course for the 21st Century. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 6. http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/275.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, D. (in press), “Dewey,” in Malachowski, A. (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Rorty. Malden. MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hookway, C. (2012), “The Principle of Pragmatism: Peirce’s Formulations and Examples,” in The Pragmatic Maxim: Essays on Peirce and Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1950), Cartesian Meditations, trans. Cairnes, D.. Dortrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (2001), Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis, Steinbock, A. J. (ed.) Dortrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Jackman, H. (1998), “James’ Pragmatic Account of Intentionality and Truth,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 34: 155–181.Google Scholar
James, W. (1976), Essays in Radical Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1988a), Manuscript Essays and Notes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1961), “Comment on Professor Bernstein’s Paper, ‘John Dewey’s Metaphysics of Experience’,” The Journal of Philosophy, 58: 14–21.Google Scholar
Kestenbaum, V. (1977), The Phenomenological Sense of John Dewey: Habit and Meaning. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (2012), “Pragmatism and Realism: A Modest Proposal,” in Preludes to Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, A. (2009), “On Hume on Space: Green’s Attack, James’s Empirical Response,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47: 415–449.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, J. T. (1986), Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, J. T. (1996), “Pragmatism: An Old Name for Some New Ways of Thinking?” Journal of American History, 83: 100–138.Google Scholar
Koopman, C. (2009), Pragmatism as Transition: Historicity and Hope in James, Dewey, and Rorty. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, C. (2014), “Conduct Pragmatism: Beyond Experientialism and Lingualism,” in Hildebrand 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, C. (2002), “Is Objectivity Perspectival: Reflexions on Brandom’s and Habermas’ Pragmatist Conceptions of Objectivity,” in Aboulafia, M., Bookman, M. O., and Kemp, C. (eds.) Habermas and Pragmatism. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Laurier, D. (2005a), “Pragmatics: Pittsburgh Style,” Pragmatics and Cognition, 13: 141–160.Google Scholar
Laurier, D. (2005b), “Between Phenomenalism and Objectivism: An Examination of R. Brandom’s Account of the Objectivity of Discursive Deontic Status,” Journal of Philosophical Research, 30: 189–214.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2010), “Rorty, Davidson, and the New Pragmatists,” Philosophical Topics, 36: 167–192.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2012), “Brandom’s Pragmatism,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 48: 125–140.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2013) “Does James Have a Place for Objectivity?: A Response to Misak,” Symposium on Cheryl Misak’s The American Pragmatists, in the European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 5. http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/551Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2015a), “Norms and Habits: Brandom on the Sociality of Action,” European Journal of Philosophy, 23: 248–272.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2015c), “Hegel, Dewey, and Habits,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23: 632–656.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2016), “Sellars and Nonconceptual Content,” European Journal of Philosophy, 24: 855–878.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2017), “Comment on Axtell’s Objectivity,” in S. F. Aikin (ed.) “Symposium on Guy Axtell’s Objectivity,” Syndicate, https://syndicate.network/symposia/philosophy/objectivity/Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2018), “James and Phenomenology,” in Klein, A. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of William James. Oxford: Oxford University Press. www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395699.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199395699-e-24Google Scholar
Levine, S. (in press a), “Rethinking Sellars’ Naturalism,” in Giladi, P. (ed.) Responses to Naturalism: Critical Perspectives from Idealism and Pragmatism. New York, NY: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (in press b), “Rorty, Davidson, and Representation,” in Malachowski, A. (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Rorty. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Linschoten, H. (1968), On the Way toward a Phenomenological Psychology: The Psychology of William James. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Loeffler, R. (2005), “Normative Phenomenalism: On Robert Brandom’s Practice-Based Explanation of Meaning,” European Journal of Philosophy, 13: 32–69.Google Scholar
Ludwig, K. (2011), “Triangulation Triangulated,” in Amoretti, C. & Preyer, G. (eds.) Triangulation: From and Epistemological Point of View. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1996b), “Response to Perception and Rational Constraint,” Philosophical Issues, 7: 290–300.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1998a), “Reply to Brandom,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58: 403–409.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1998b), “Reply to Peacocke,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58: 414–419.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2000b) “Response to Willaschek,” in Willaschek, M. (ed.) John McDowell: Reason and Nature. Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2000c) “Response to Gubeljic, Link, Müller, and Osburg,” in Willaschek, M. (ed.) John McDowell: Reason and Nature. Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2008), “Response to Halbig,” in Lingaard, J. (ed.) Experience, Norm, and Nature. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2009a), “Self-Determining Subjectivity and External Constraint,” in Having the World in View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2009b), “Conceptual Capacities in Perception,” in Having the World in View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2009c), “Avoiding the Myth of the Given,” in Having the World in View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2009d), “What Myth?” in The Engaged Intellect. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGilvary, E. B. (1908), “The Chicago ‘Idea’ and Idealism,” The Journal of Philosophy, 5: 589–597.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1962). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013), Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Landes, D.. New York, NY: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Mounce, H. (1997), The Two Pragmatisms: From Peirce to Rorty. New York, NY: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. E. (1951), “Dewey’s Epistemology and Metaphysics,” in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) The Philosophy of John Dewey. New York, NY: Tudor Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Myers, G. (1986), William James: His Life and Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1979), “Panpsychism,” in Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Shea, J. (2007), Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pappas, G. (2016), “John Dewey’s Radical Logic: The Function of the Qualitative in Thinking,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 52: 435–468.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. (1998), “Nonconceptual Content Defended,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58: 381–388.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. (2001), “Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content?” Journal of Philosophy, 98: 239–264.Google Scholar
Pearce, T. (2014), “The Dialectical Biologist, circa 1890: John Dewey and the Oxford Hegelians,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 52: 747–777.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1992), The Essential Peirce, Volume 1: Selected Philosophical Writings‚ (1867–1893), Houser, N. and Kloesel, J. K. (eds.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1998), The Essential Peirce, Volume 2: Selected Philosophical Writings, (1893–1913). The Peirce Edition Project (ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, B. (2006), “Explaining Action with Habits,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 43: 57–68.Google Scholar
Price, H. (2003), “Truth as Convenient Friction,” Journal of Philosophy, 100: 167–190.Google Scholar
Price, H. (2013), Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prien, B. (2010), “Robert Brandom on Communication, Reference, and Objectivity,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 18: 433–458.Google Scholar
Pratt, S. (1997), “‘A Sailor in a Storm’: Dewey on the Meaning of Language,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 33: 839–862.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1990a), “Realism with a Human Face,” in Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1990b), “James’ Theory of Perception,” in Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1997), “James’ Theory of Truth,” in Putnam, R. A. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1998), “Pragmatism and Realism,” in Dickstein, M. (ed.) The Revival of Pragmatism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1999), The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body, and World. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ramberg, B. (2000), “Post-Ontological Philosophy of Mind: Rorty versus Davidson,” in Brandom 2000b.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1965), “Mind-Body Identity, Privacy, and Categories,” in Rosenthal, D. (ed.) Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1970), “Incorrigibility as the Mark of the Mental,” Journal of Philosophy, 67: 399–424.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1971), “In Defense of Eliminative Materialism,” in Rosenthal, D. (ed.) Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1982), “Dewey’s Metaphysics,” in The Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1985), “Comments on Sleeper and Edel,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 21: 39–48.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1991a), Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1998c), “Robert Brandom on Social Practices and Representations,” in Rorty 1998a.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1998d), “The Very Idea of Human Answerability to the World: John McDowell’s Version of Empiricism,” in Rorty 1998a.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1999a), “Davidson’s Mental-Physical Distinction,” in Hahn, L. E. (ed.) Donald Davidson (Library of Living Philosophers). Peru, IL: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1999b), “Pragmatism As Anti-Authoritarianism,” in Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 53: 7–20.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (2007), “Pragmatism and Romanticism,” in Philosophy as Cultural Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rock, I. (1990), “A Look Back at William James’s Theory of Perception,” in Johnson, M. G. and Henley, T. B. (eds.) Reflections on The Principles of Psychology: William James after a Century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1951), “Dewey’s New Logic,” in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) The Philosophy of John Dewey. New York, NY: Tudor Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1996), “Warranted Assertibility,” in An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Sachs, C. (2009), “Natural Agents: A Transcendental Argument for Pragmatic Naturalism,” Contemporary Pragmatism, 6: 15–37.Google Scholar
Sachs, C. (2014), Intentionality and Myths of the Given. New York, NY: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. (1951), “Dewey’s Naturalistic Metaphysics,” in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) The Philosophy of John Dewey. New York, NY: Tudor Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1975), “Autobiographical Reflections,” in Castañeda, Hector-Neri (ed.) Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Critical Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1981), “Foundations for a Metaphysics of Pure Process (The Carus Lectures),” The Monist, 64: 3–90.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1991), Science, Perception and Reality. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1997), Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shook, J. (1995), “John Dewey’s Struggle with American Realism, 1904–1910,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31: 542–566.Google Scholar
Shusterman, R. (1994), “Dewey on Experience: Foundation or Reconstruction?” The Philosophical Forum, 26: 127–148.Google Scholar
Siewert, C. (2005), “Attention and Sensorimotor Intentionality,” in Smith, D. W. and Thomasson, A. L. Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skrupskelis, I. L. (1989), “James and Kant’s Second Analogy,” Kant-Studien, 80: 173–179.Google Scholar
Siegfried, C. H. (1978), Chaos and Context: A Study in William James. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Sleeper, R. (1986), The Necessity of Pragmatism: John Dewey’s Conception of Philosophy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Speaks, J. (2005), “Is There a Problem about Nonconceptual Content?” The Philosophical Review, 114: 359–398.Google Scholar
Stern, R. (2000), Transcendental Arguments and Skepticism: Answering the Question of Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. (2017), “Physicalist Panpsychism,” in Schneider, S. and Velmans, M. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stout, J. (2007), “On Our Interest in Getting Things Right: Pragmatism without Narcissism,” in Misak, C. (ed.) New Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stout, R. (2010), “Being Subject to the Rule to Do What the Rules Tell You to Do,” in Weiss, B. and Wanderer, J. (eds.) Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Testa, I. (2017), “Dewey, Second Nature, Social Criticism, and the Hegelian Heritage,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 9. http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/990Google Scholar
Tiles, J. E. (2010), “The Primacy of Practice in Dewey’s Experimental Empiricism,” in Cochran, M. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Dewey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999), The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wanderer, J. (2008), Robert Brandom. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Welchman, J. (2008), “Dewey and McDowell on Naturalism, Values, and Second Nature,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 22: 50–58.Google Scholar
Willaschek, M. (1999), “On ‘The Unboundedness of the Conceptual’,” in Willaschek, M. (ed.) John McDowell: Reason and Nature. Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2000) ‘Epistemology and the Mirror of Nature’, in Brandom, 2000b (ed.) Rorty and His Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Wilshire, B. (1968), William James and Phenomenology: A Study of the “Principles of Psychology.” Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar