Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Figures
- Preface
- Postscript: The 2008 Financial Crisis
- Acknowledgements
- Glossary and Acronyms
- The Editors
- The Contributors
- 1 A Brief Overview of Growth and Poverty in Indonesia during the New Order and after the Asian Economic Crisis
- Part One Trends in Poverty and Technical Issues of Measurement
- 2 The Impact of the Economic Crisis on Consumption Expenditures and Poverty Incidence
- 3 Poverty and Vulnerability in Indonesia Before and After the Economic Crisis
- 4 Short-term Poverty Dynamics in Rural Indonesia during the Economic Crisis
- 5 The Evolution of Poverty during the Crisis in Indonesia
- Part Two Poverty Alleviation Policies and Programs
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - Short-term Poverty Dynamics in Rural Indonesia during the Economic Crisis
from Part One - Trends in Poverty and Technical Issues of Measurement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Figures
- Preface
- Postscript: The 2008 Financial Crisis
- Acknowledgements
- Glossary and Acronyms
- The Editors
- The Contributors
- 1 A Brief Overview of Growth and Poverty in Indonesia during the New Order and after the Asian Economic Crisis
- Part One Trends in Poverty and Technical Issues of Measurement
- 2 The Impact of the Economic Crisis on Consumption Expenditures and Poverty Incidence
- 3 Poverty and Vulnerability in Indonesia Before and After the Economic Crisis
- 4 Short-term Poverty Dynamics in Rural Indonesia during the Economic Crisis
- 5 The Evolution of Poverty during the Crisis in Indonesia
- Part Two Poverty Alleviation Policies and Programs
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
INTRODUCTION
During the economic crisis in Indonesia, the headcount rate on poverty changed relatively quickly over short periods of time. Poverty increased rapidly when the crisis worsened and, likewise, decreased rapidly when the economy stabilized. This implies that large numbers of households were moving in and out of poverty relatively frequently. It also implies that a significant number of households experienced relatively short periods of poverty, that is, just a fraction of a year.
Generally, the movement of households in and out of poverty is assessed on a yearly basis (for example, Bane and Ellwood 1983; Baulch and Hoddinott 2000; Jalan and Ravallion 1999a, 2000). These studies utilize panel data of households with a year as the basic time unit. According to these data, a household deemed not poor in two consecutive surveys will be considered as having never been poor during the whole period between the two surveys. In reality, however, the household could have experienced a period of poverty in between the two surveys. Such a situation could occur, for example, if each year the survey was conducted in the harvest season, a period when rural households are generally better off.
To understand the short-term dynamics of poverty, it is necessary to have panel data that rely upon a time unit that is less than a year. Muller (1997), for example, uses quarterly panel data in a one-year period between 1982 and 1983 to estimate the transient seasonal and chronic poverty of peasants in rural Rwanda. He finds that the worst poverty occurs after the dry season at the end of the year. Severe poverty is generally the result of a seasonal, transient component of annual poverty, where the seasonal component of the incidence of poverty is much smaller. Hence he concludes that the actual differences in the severity of poverty, either between developing and developed countries or between rural and urban areas in developing countries, may be much worse than shown by the usual chronic annual poverty measures or by measures of the seasonal incidence of poverty.
Similarly, Dercon and Krishnan (2000) use a panel data set of households in rural Ethiopia that were visited three times over an eighteen-month period.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Poverty and Social Protection in Indonesia , pp. 63 - 80Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2010