Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:58:20.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - On Being a Woman in Academic Psychology

from Part III - Your Research/Academic Career

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2022

Mitchell J. Prinstein
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

The goal of this chapter is to offer a candid snapshot of what it’s like to be a woman in modern academic Psychology and Neuroscience. We also hope to generate conversation around shared experiences and provide a vision into a more equitable path forward for women in our field. By academic Psychology, we mean careers focused on research and teaching in the fields of psychological science or neuroscience. We are most directly speaking to careers that are housed in universities, colleges, or research institutes, but of course the issues we discuss are not unique to those places (or even Psychology or academia, more specifically).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Portable Mentor
Expert Guide to a Successful Career in Psychology
, pp. 303 - 326
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alper, J. (1993). The pipeline is leaking women all the way along. Science, 260, 409411. doi:10.1126/science.260.5106.409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychological Association, Committee on Women in Psychology. (2017). The changing gender composition of psychology: Update and expansion of the 1995 task force report. Retrieved from www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/gender-composition/task-force-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Amanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 256267. doi:10.1037/a0017094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artz, B., Goodall, A. H., & Oswald, A. J. (2018). Do women ask? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 57, 611636. doi:10.1111/irel.12214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bareket-Shavit, C., Goldie, P. D., Mortenson, E., & Roberts, S. O. (in preparation). Gender Inequality in Psychological Research. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Brower, A., & James, A. (2020). Research performance and age explain less than half of the gender pay gap in New Zealand universities. PLoS One, 15(1), Article e0226392. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226392Google Scholar
Carter-Sowell, A. R., Dickens, D. D., Miller, G., & Zimmerman, C. A. (2016). Present but not accounted for: Examining how marginalized intersectional identities create a double bind for women of color in the academy. In Ballenger, J., Polnick, B., & Irby, B. (Eds.), Research on Women and Education Series. Women of color in STEM: Navigating the workforce (pp. 181200). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 75141. doi:10.1177/1529100614541236Google Scholar
Dworkin, J. D., Linn, K. A., Teich, E. G., Zurn, P., Shinohara, R. T., & Bassett, D. S. (2020). The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nature Neuroscience, 23, 918926. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geiger, A. W., Livingston, G., Bialik, K. (2019, May 6). Six facts about U.S. moms (Analysis of American Time Use Survey Data). Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/08/facts-about-u-s-mothers/Google Scholar
Guarino, C. M., & Borden, V. M. H. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58, 672694. doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2Google Scholar
Guy, B., & Arthur, B. (2020). Academic motherhood during COVID-19: Navigating our dual roles as educators and mothers. Gender, Work and Organization, 27, 887899. doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12493">doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12493CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruber, J., Mendle, J., Lindquist, K. A., Schmader, T., Clark, L. A., Bliss-Moreau, E., Akinola, M., Atlas, L., Barch, D. M., Barrett, L. F., Borelli, J. L., Brannon, T. N., Bunge, S. A., Campos, B., Cantlon, J., Carter, R., Carter-Sowell, A. R., Chen, S., Craske, M. G., … Williams, L. A. (2021). The future of women in psychological science. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 16, 483516. doi: 10.1177/1745691620952789Google Scholar
Hechtman, L. A., Moore, N. P., Schulkey, C. E., Miklos, A. C., Calcagno, A. M., Aragon, R., & Greenberg, J. H. (2018). NIH funding longevity by gender. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 79437948. doi:10.1073/pnas.1800615115Google Scholar
Hengle, E. (2020). Publishing while female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Retrieved from: www.erinhengel.com/research/publishing_female.pdfGoogle Scholar
King, M. M., Bergstrom, C. T., Correll, S. J., Jacquet, J., & West, J. D. (2017). Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 122. doi:10.1177/2378023117738903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kugler, K. G., Reif, J. A. M., Kaschner, T., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2018). Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 198222. doi:10.1037/bul0000135Google Scholar
Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347, 262265. doi:10.1126/science.1261375CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindquist, K. A., Gruber, J., Schleider, J. L., Beer, J. S., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Weinstock, L. (2020, November 25). Flawed data and unjustified conclusions cannot elevate the status of women in science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qn3aeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magua, W., Zhu, X., Bhattacharya, A., Filut, A., Potvien, A., Leatherberry, R., Lee, Y.-G., Jens, M., Malikireddy, D., Carnes, M., & Kaatz, A. (2017). Are female applicants disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health peer review? Combining algorithmic text mining and qualitative methods to detect evaluative differences in R01 reviewers’ critiques. Journal of Women’s Health, 26, 560570. doi:10.1089/jwh.2016.6021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N. H., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter? Gender and family in the ivory tower. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Minello, A. (2020). The pandemic and the female academic. Nature. doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01135-9">doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01135-9doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01135-9>Google Scholar
Minello, A., Martucci, S., & Manzo, L. K. (2021). The pandemic and the academic mothers: Present hardships and future perspectives. European Societies, 23(Suppl. 1), S82S94. doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1809690">doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1809690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2014). Survey of doctorate recipients, 2013. Retrieved from http://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/doctoratework/2013/Google Scholar
Odic, D., & Wojcik, E. H. (2020). The publication gender gap in psychology. American Psychologist, 75, 92103. doi:10.1037/amp0000480CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D., & Mortenson, E. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 12951309. doi:10.1177/1745691620927709CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sege, R., Nykiel-Bub, L., & Selk, S. (2015). Sex differences in institutional support for junior biomedical researchers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 314, 11751177. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8517CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witteman, H. O., Hendricks, M., Straus, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2019). Are gender gaps due to evaluation of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. The Lancet, 10171, 531540. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4Google Scholar
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 55123). New York: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7Google Scholar
Zimmerman, C. A., Carter-Sowell, A. R., & Xu, X. (2016). Examining workplace ostracism experiences in academia: Understanding how gender differences in the faculty ranks influence inclusive climates on campus. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 753. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00753Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×