Book contents
- The Politics of Legal Expertise in EU Policy-Making
- Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy
- The Politics of Legal Expertise in EU Policy-Making
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties, Legislation and Institutional Sources
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Who Are EU Legal Advisers?
- 3 What Do EU Legal Advisers Do?
- 4 Confidentiality of Legal Advice
- 5 The Commission Legal Service
- 6 Legal Advice in Council Decision-Making
- 7 Legal Advice in the European Parliament
- 8 Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 September 2021
Book contents
- The Politics of Legal Expertise in EU Policy-Making
- Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy
- The Politics of Legal Expertise in EU Policy-Making
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties, Legislation and Institutional Sources
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Who Are EU Legal Advisers?
- 3 What Do EU Legal Advisers Do?
- 4 Confidentiality of Legal Advice
- 5 The Commission Legal Service
- 6 Legal Advice in Council Decision-Making
- 7 Legal Advice in the European Parliament
- 8 Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Politics of Legal Expertise in EU Policy-Making , pp. 308 - 328Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Primary Sources
Abels, G. and Behrens, M. ‘Interviewing Experts in Political Science: A Reflection on Gender and Policy Effects Based on Secondary Analysis’ in Bogner, A., Littig, B. and Menz, W. (eds.), Interviewing Experts (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 138–56Google Scholar
Agerbeek, F. R. ‘The Legal Service of the Commission’ in Guinchard, E. and Granger, M. P. (eds.), The New EU Judiciary: An Analysis of Current Judicial Reforms (Alphen van den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2017), pp. 221–32Google Scholar
Ambrus, M., Arts, K., Hey, E. and Raulus, H. (eds.), The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armati, L. ‘Acts of Rebellion, or the Enemy Within? A Consideration of the Combative Ruling of the Supreme Court of Denmark and the Imperative of Genuine Judicial Dialogue’ in Lenaerts, K., Bonichot, J.-C., Kanninen, H., Naômé, C. and Pohjankoski, P. (eds.) An Ever-Changing Union? Perspectives on the Future of EU Law in Honour of Allan Rosas (Oxford: Hart, 2019)Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. and Davis, G. ‘Empirical Research in Law’ in Cane, P. and Tushnet, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 880-99Google Scholar
Banks, K. ‘The Lisbon Treaty’s Competence Arrangement Viewed from the European Commission Practice’ in Garben, S. and Govaere, I. (eds.), The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States: Reflections on the Past, Present and the Future (Oxford: Hart, 2017), pp. 188–97Google Scholar
Baquero Cruz, J. What’s Left of the Law of Integration? Decay and Resistance in European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Beach, D. ‘The Facilitator of Efficient Negotiations in the Council: The Impact of the Council Secretariat’ in Naurin, D. and Wallace, H. (eds.), Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 219–37Google Scholar
Berman, F. ‘The International Lawyer, Inside and Outside Foreign Ministries’ in Hill, C. and Beshoff, P. (eds.), The Two Worlds of International Relations: Academics, Practitioners and the Trade in Ideas (Abingdon: Routledge, 1994), pp. 79–92Google Scholar
Bishop, M. ‘The Council’s Legal Service’ in Westlake, M. and Galloway, D. (eds.), The Council of the European Union, 3rd ed. (London: John Harper, 2004), pp. 357–66Google Scholar
Bishop, M. and Naert, F. ‘The Role of the Council Legal Service in Ensuring Respect for the Law’ in Czuczai, J. and Naert, F. (eds.), The EU as a Global Actor – Bridging Legal Theory and Practice: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Ricardo Gosalbo Bono (Leiden: Brill, 2017), pp. 87–110Google Scholar
Bogner, A. and Menz, W. ‘The Theory-Generating Expert Interview: Epistemological Interest, Forms of Knowledge, Interaction’ in Bogner, A., Littig, B. and Menz, W. (eds.), Interviewing Experts (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 43–80Google Scholar
Bull, T. ‘Judges without a Court: Judicial Preview in Sweden’ in Campbell, T., Ewing, K. D. and Tomkins, A. (eds.), The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 392–409Google Scholar
Cotterell, R. Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar
Cummings, S. L. ‘What Good Are Lawyers?’ in Cummings, S. L. (ed.) The Paradox of Professionalism: Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 1–28Google Scholar
Driessen, B. Transparency in EU Institutional Law: A Practitioner’s Handbook (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2012)Google Scholar
Driessen, B. ‘How Elastic Is Article 263 TFEU? Some Comments from a Sore Winner’ in Czuczai, J. and Naert, F. (eds.), The EU as a Global Actor – Bridging Legal Theory and Practice: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Ricardo Gosalbo Bono (Leiden: Brill, 2017), pp. 166–73Google Scholar
Dewost, J.-L. ‘Allan’s Legal Battles before the Court, Acting as the Commission’s Agent’ in Lenaerts, K., Bonichot, J.-C., Kanninen, H., Naômé, C. and Pohjankoski, P. (eds.), An Ever-Changing Union? Perspectives on the Future of EU Law in Honour of Allan Rosas (Oxford: Hart, 2019), pp. 177–81Google Scholar
Eckes, C. EU Powers under External Pressure: How the EU’s External Actions Alter Its Internal Structures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Fenster, M. The Transparency Fix: Secrets, Leaks and Uncontrollable Government Information (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Fish, S. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Foster, K.R. and Huber, P.W. Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Foucault, M. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (London: Routledge 1970/2004)Google Scholar
Garcón Clariana, G. ‘The Shifting Powers of the European Parliament: Democratic Legitimacy and the Competences of the European Union’ in Garben, S. and Govare, I. (eds.), The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States: Reflections on the Past, the Present and the Future (Oxford: Hart, 2017), pp. 276–83Google Scholar
Garzón Clariana, G. ‘The Work of the Legal Adviser of International Organisations, with Special Reference to the European Union’ in Jiménez Piernes, C. (ed.), The Legal Practice in International Law and European Community Law: A Spanish Perspective (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2007), pp. 239–54Google Scholar
Georgakakis, D. European Civil Service in (Times of) Crisis: A Political Sociology of the Changing Power of Eurocrats (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017)Google Scholar
Gläser, J. and Laudel, G. ‘On Interviewing “Good” and “Bad” Experts’ in Bogner, A., Littig, B. and Menz, W. (eds.), Interviewing Experts (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 117–37Google Scholar
Granger, M. P. ‘From the Margins of the European Legal Field: The Governments’ Agents and Their Influence on the Development of European Union Law’ in Vauchez, A. and de Witte, B. (eds.), Lawyering Europe: European Law as a Transnational Social Field (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 55–72Google Scholar
Häge, F. M. Bureaucrats as Law-Makers: Committee Decision-Making in the EU Council of Ministers (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013)Google Scholar
Halliday, T. C. and Karpik, L. ‘Politics Matter: A Comparative Theory of Lawyers in the Making of Political Liberalism’ in Halliday, T. C. and Karpik, L. (eds.), Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism: Europe and North America from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 15–64Google Scholar
Hofmann, A. Strategies of the Repeat Player: The European Commission between Courtroom and Legislature (Berlin: Epubli, 2013)Google Scholar
Howarth, D. Law as Engineering. Thinking About What Lawyers Do (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013)Google Scholar
Jacqué, J.-P. ‘The Role of Legal Services in the Elaboration of European Legislation’ in Vauchez, A. and de Witte, B. (eds.), Lawyering Europe: European Law as a Transnational Social Field (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 43–54Google Scholar
Jansen, N. ‘Making Doctrine for European Law’ in van Gestel, R., Micklitz, H.-W. and Rubin, E. L. (eds.), Rethinking Legal Scholarship: A Transatlantic Dialogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 229–61Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovchelovitsch, S. and Bauer, M. W. ‘Narrative Interviewing’ in Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (eds.), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook (London: Sage, 2000), pp. 58–74Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. ‘The Legal Scholar as Academic Expert’ in Korkea-aho, E. and Leino-Sandberg, P. (eds.), Law, Legal Expertise and EU Policy-Making (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar
Klamert, M., Kellerbauer, M. and Tomkin, J. (eds.), The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Kleine, M. Informal Governance in the European Union: How Governments Make International Organizations Work (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komárek, J. ‘Legal Reasoning in EU Law’ in Arnull, A. and Chalmers, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 28–51Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘Between Commitment and Cynicism: Outline for a Theory of International Law as Practice’ in d’Aspremont, J., Gazzini, T., Nollkaemper, A. and Werner, W. (eds.), International Law as a Profession (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017), pp. 38–66Google Scholar
Kronman, A. T. The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Kuijper, P. J. ‘Missteps by Commissioners: Legal or Political Sanctions?’ in Amtenbrink, F., Davies, G., Kochenov, D. and Lindeboom, J. (eds.), The Internal Market and the Future of European Integration: Essays in Honour of Laurence W. Gormley (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019), pp. 470–92Google Scholar
Ladenburger, C. ‘Anmerkungen zur Frage der “Eigenlegitimation der Ministerialbürokratie” im institutionellen System der Europäischen Union’ in Franzius, C., Mayer, F. D. and Neyer, J. (eds.), Modelle des Parlamentariusmus im 21. Jahrhundert (Baden Baden: Nomos 2015), pp. 303–21Google Scholar
Latour, B. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’État (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Laws, S. ‘Legislation and Politics’ in Feldman, D. (ed.), Law in Politics, Politics in Law (Oxford: Hart, 2015), pp. 87–104Google Scholar
Lee, M. ‘Experts and Publics in EU Environmental Law’ in Arnull, A. and Chalmers, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 991–1014Google Scholar
Legal, H. ‘Les institutions politiques de l’Union et la Cour de justice: Le point de vue du Conseil’ in Rosas, A., Levits, E. and Bot, Y. (eds.), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013), pp. 141–54Google Scholar
Leino, P. ‘Accountability Dilemmas of Regulating Financial Markets through the European Supervisory Agencies’ in Harlow, C., Leino, P. and della Cananea, G. (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Administrative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017), pp. 209–37Google Scholar
Leino, P. ‘Disruptive Democracy: Keeping EU Citizens in a Box’ in Govare, I. and Garben, S. (eds.), The Future of Constitutional Democracy in Europe: A Legal Assessment (Oxford: Hart, 2019), pp. 295–316Google Scholar
Leino, P. ‘The Institutional Politics of Objective Choice: Competence as a Framework for Argumentation’ in Garben, S. and Govaere, I. (eds.), The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States: Reflections on the Past, the Present and the Future (Oxford: Hart, 2017), pp. 210–31Google Scholar
Leino, P. ‘The Politics of Efficient Compromise in the Adoption of EU Legal Acts’ in Cremona, M. and Kilpatrick, C. (eds.), EU Legal Acts: Challenges and Transformations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 30–69Google Scholar
Leino, P. ‘The Principle of Transparency in EU External Relations Law: Does Diplomatic Secrecy Stand a Chance of Surviving the Age of Twitter?’ in Cremona, M. (ed.), Structural Principles in EU External Relations Law (Oxford: Hart, 2018), pp. 201–23Google Scholar
Leino, P. ‘Public Access to ECB Documents: Are Accountability, Independence and Effectiveness an Impossible Trinity?’ in Bank, European Central (ed.), Building Bridges: Central Banking Law in an Interconnected World (ECB, 2019), pp. 195–219Google Scholar
Leino-Sandberg, P. and Saarenheimo, T. ‘Discretion, Economic Governance, and the (New) Political Commission’ in Mendes, J. (ed.), EU Executive Discretion and the Limits of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 132–54Google Scholar
Lewis, J. ‘Strategic Bargaining, Norms and Deliberation’ in Naurin, D. and Wallace, H. (eds.), Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 165–84Google Scholar
Lewis, P. ‘Aspects of Professionalism: Constructing the Lawyer-Client Relationship’ in Cummings, S. L. (ed.), The Paradox of Professionalism: Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 132–52Google Scholar
Lindseth, P. L. ‘Disequilibrium and Disconnect: On Weiler’s (Still Robust) Theory of European Transformation’ in Maduro, M. P. and Wind, M. (eds.), The Transformation of Europe: Twenty-Five Years On (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 120–34Google Scholar
Lindseth, P. L. Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Luban, D. Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Maclntyre, A. After Virtue, 2nd ed. (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Martínez Iglesias, M. J. ‘The Accidental Democracy: A European Model’ in Garben, S., Govaere, I. and Nemitz, P. (eds.), Critical Reflections on Constitutional Democracy in the European Union (Oxford: Hart, 2019), pp. 199–212Google Scholar
Martínez Iglesias, M. J. ‘The Lisbon Treaty’s Competence Arrangement Viewed by the European Parliament’ in Garben, S. and Govare, I. (eds.), The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States: Reflections on the Past, the Present and the Future (Oxford: Hart, 2017), pp. 198–209Google Scholar
Mather, L. ‘How and Why Do Lawyers Misbehave? Lawyers, Discipline, and Collegial Control’ in Cummings, S. L. (ed.), The Paradox of Professionalism: Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 109–31Google Scholar
Meuser, M. and Nagel, U. ‘Experts and Changes in Knowledge Production’ in Bogner, A., Littig, B. and Menz, W. (eds.), Interviewing Experts (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 17–42Google Scholar
Moorhead, R., Vaughan, S. and Godinho, C. In-House Lawyers’ Ethics: Institutional Logics, Legal Risk and the Tournament of Influence (Oxford: Hart, 2018)Google Scholar
Naert, F. ‘The Use of the CFSP Legal Basis for EU International Agreements in Combination with Other Legal Bases’ in Czuczai, J. and Naert, F. (eds.), The EU as a Global Actor – Bridging Legal Theory and Practice: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Ricardo Gosalbo Bono (Leiden: Brill, 2017), pp. 394–423Google Scholar
Nastase, A. Public Ethics at the European Commission: Politics, Reform and Individual Views (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016)Google Scholar
Pennera, C. ‘La Cour de Justice et le Parlement europeen’ in Rosas, A., Levits, E. and Bot, Y. (eds.), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-Law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013), pp. 121–39Google Scholar
Petersen, H., Kjaer, A. L., Krunke, H. and Madsen, M. R. (eds.), Paradoxes of European Legal Integration (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008)Google Scholar
Piris, J.-C. A Constitution for Europe: A Legal Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Piris, J.-C. The Future of Europe: Towards a Two-Speed EU? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Piris, J.-C. The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Piris, J.-C. ‘The Quality of Community Legislation: The Viewpoint of the Council Legal Service’ in Kellermann, A. E., Ciavarini Azzi, G., Jacobs, S. H. and Deighton-Smith, E. (eds.), Improving the Quality of Legislation (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998) 25–38Google Scholar
Pozen, D. E. and Schoudon, M. (eds.), Troubling Transparency: The History and Future of Freedom of Information (New York: Columbia University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Ramírez Pérez, S. ‘The Legal Service’ in Bussière, É, Dujardin, V., Dumoulin, M., Ludlow, P., Brouwer, J. W. and Tilly, P. (eds.), The European Commission 1973–1986: History and Memories of an Institution (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014), pp. 115–20Google Scholar
Romero Requena, L. ‘La Commission devant la Cour de justice: L’exemple de la procédure préjudicielle’ in Rosas, A., Levits, E. and Bot, Y. (eds.), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Rosas, A. and Armati, L. EU Constitutional Law: An Introduction, 3rd ed. (London: Hart, 2018)Google Scholar
Rossi, L. S. ‘The Principle of Equality among Member States of the European Union’ in Rossi, L. S. and Casolari, F. (eds.), The Principle of Equality in EU Law (Cham: Springer, 2017), pp. 3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, P. Torture Team: Deception, Cruelty and the Compromise of Law (London: Penguin, 2008)Google Scholar
Smulders, B. ‘The Double Legitimacy and Multiple Accountability of the European Commission: Some Reflections on Its Constitutional Democratic Role’ in Garben, S., Govaere, I. and Nemitz, P. (eds.), Critical Reflections on Constitutional Democracy in the European Union (Oxford: Hart, 2019), pp. 181–98Google Scholar
Southworth, A., Paik, A. and Heinz, J. P. ‘Lawyers in National Policymaking’ in Cummings, S. L. (ed.), The Paradox of Professionalism: Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 220–42Google Scholar
Tallberg, J. ‘The Power of the Chair: Formal Leadership by the Council Presidency’ in Naurin, D. and Wallace, H. (eds.), Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 187–202Google Scholar
van Gerven, D. ‘Professional Secrecy in Europe’ in The Bar of Brussels (ed.),Professional Secrecy of Lawyers in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 1–23Google Scholar
van Middelaar, L. ‘Taking Decisions or Setting Norms?’ in Steunenberg, B., Voermans, W. and van Bogaert, S. (eds.), Fit for the Future: Reflections from Leiden on the Functioning of the EU (The Hague: Eleven International, 2013), pp. 11–28Google Scholar
Vauchez, A. Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Vauchez, A. ‘How to Become a Transnational Elite: Lawyers’ Politics at the Genesis of the European Communities (1950–1970)’ in Petersen, H., Kjaer, A. L., Krunke, H. and Madsen, M. R. (eds.), Paradoxes of European Legal Integration (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), pp. 129–48Google Scholar
Vauchez, A. and de Witte, B. (eds.), Lawyering Europe: European Law as a Transnational Social Field (Oxford: Hart, 2013)Google Scholar
Vowe, G. ‘Politics, Policy, Polity’ in Kaid, L. L. and Holtz-Bacha, C. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Political Communication (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008), pp. 620–21Google Scholar
Webley, L. ‘Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research’ in Cane, P. and Kritzer, H. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010), pp. 927–50Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. ‘The Transformation of Europe Revisited: The Things That Do Not Transform’ in Maduro, M. P and Wind, M (eds.), The Transformation of Europe: Twenty-Five Years On (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 333–51Google Scholar
Wendel, W. B. Lawyers and Fidelity to Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Windsor, M. ‘Consigliere or Conscience? The Role of the Government Legal Adviser’ in d’Aspremont, J., Gazzini, T., Nollkaemper, A. and Werner, W. (eds.), International Law as a Profession (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 355–88Google Scholar
Wolf, S. ‘Ethics, Legal Ethics, and the Ethics of Law’ in Luban, D. (ed.), The Good Lawyer: Lawyers’ Roles and Lawyers’ Ethics (Totowa: Rowan and Allanheld, 1984), pp. 38–59Google Scholar
Yong, B. Risk Management: Government Lawyers and the Provision of Legal Advice within Whitehall (London: Constitution Society, 2013)Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Aberbach, J. D. and Rockman, B. A. ‘Conducting and Coding Elite Interviews’ (2002) 35 PS: Political Science and Politics 673–76Google Scholar
Allott, P. ‘The International Lawyer in Government Service: Ontology and Deontology’ (2005) 23 Wisconsin International Law Journal 13–24Google Scholar
‘An Interview with Jean-Claude Piris’ (2011) 52 Harvard International Law Journal 171–81Google Scholar
Arnull, A. ‘Joined Cases C-39/05 P & C-52/05 P, Sweden and Turco v. Council, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 1 July 2008’ (2009) 46 Common Market Law Review 1219–38Google Scholar
Azoulai, L. ‘The “Retained Powers” Formula in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice: EU Law as Total Law?’ (2011) 4 European Journal of Legal Studies 192–219Google Scholar
Baez, B. ‘Confidentiality in Qualitative Research: Reflections on Secrets, Power and Agency’ (2002) 2 Qualitative Research 35–58Google Scholar
Baratta, R. ‘Rule of Law “Dialogues” within the EU: A Legal Assessment’ (2016) 8 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 357–72Google Scholar
Barents, R. ‘The Internal Market Unlimited: Some Observations on the Legal Basis of Community Legislation’ (1993) 30 Common Market Law Review 85–109Google Scholar
Bartelt, S. ‘ACP-EU Development Cooperation at a Crossroads? One Year after the Second Revision of the Cotonou Agreement’ (2012) 17 European Foreign Affairs Review 1–25Google Scholar
Bartelt, S. ‘The Institutional Interplay Regarding the New Architecture for the EC’s External Assistance’ (2008) 14 European Law Journal 655–79Google Scholar
Becker, S., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S. and Kassim, H. ‘The Commission: Boxed In and Constrained, but Still an Engine of Integration’ (2016) 39 West European Politics 1011–31Google Scholar
Berenson, S. K. ‘The Duty Defined: Specific Obligations That Follow from Civil Government Lawyers’ General Duty to Serve the Public Interest’ (2003) 42 Brandeis Law Journal 13–70Google Scholar
Besson, S. ‘From European Integration to European Integrity: Should European Law Speak with Just One Voice?’ (2004) 10 European Law Journal 257–81Google Scholar
Blanchet, T. ‘From Workers to Citizens: The Evolution of European Citizenship’ (2016) 7 New Journal of European Criminal Law 142–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, T. ‘The Genesis of Protocol 36’ (2015) 6 New Journal of European Criminal Law 434–49Google Scholar
Blanchet, T. ‘The Treaty of Lisbon: A Story in History or the Making of a Treaty’ (2011) 34 Fordham International Law Journal 1217–50Google Scholar
Bobek, M. ‘A Fourth in the Court: Why Are There Advocates-General in the Court of Justice?’ (2011–2012) 14 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 529–61Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’ (1987) 38 Hastings Law Journal 805–53Google Scholar
Bowler, S. and Farrell, D. M. ‘The Organizing of the European Parliament: Committees, Specialization and Co-ordination’ (1995) 25 British Journal of Political Science 219–43Google Scholar
Bradley, K. S. C. ‘Legal Developments in the European Parliament’ (1990) 10 Yearbook of European Law 367–405Google Scholar
Bradley, K. S. C. ‘Maintaining the Balance: The Role of the Court of Justice in Defining the Institutional Position of the European Parliament’ (1987) 24 Common Market Law Review 41–64Google Scholar
Bradley, K. S. C. ‘The Variable Evolution of the Standing of the European Parliament in Proceedings before the Court of Justice’ (1988) 8 Yearbook of European Law 27–57Google Scholar
Christiansen, T. ‘After the Spitzenkandidaten: Fundamental Change in the EU’s Political System?’ (2016) 39 West European Politics 992–1010Google Scholar
Clark, K. ‘Government Lawyers and Confidentiality Norms’ (2007) 85 Washington University Law Review 1033–100Google Scholar
Cohen, A. ‘Constitutionalism without Constitution: Transnational Elites between Political Mobilisation and Legal Expertise in the Making of a Constitution for Europe’ (2007) 32(1) Law & Social Inquiry 109–35Google Scholar
Cohen, A. and Vauchez, A. ‘Introduction: Law, Lawyers, and Transnational Politics in the Production of Europe’ (2007) 32 Law & Social Inquiry 75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. and Vauchez, A. ‘Les juristes et l’ordre politique européen’ Critique internationale, 2005/1 (26), 97-9Google Scholar
Conant, L. ‘Review Article: The Politics of Legal Integration’ (2007) 45 (1) Journal of Common Market Studies 45–66Google Scholar
Constable, M. Just Silences: The Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Costa, O. ‘Administrer le Parlement européen: Les paradoxes d’un Secrétariat général incontournable, mais faible’ (2003) 3 Politique européenne 143–61Google Scholar
Craig, P. ‘Pringle: Legal Reasoning, Text, Purpose and Teleology’ (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 3–11Google Scholar
Cramton, R. C. ‘The Lawyer as Whistleblower: Confidentiality and the Government Lawyer’ (1991) 5 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 291–316Google Scholar
Cullen, H. and Charlesworth, A. ‘Diplomacy by Other Means: The Use of Legal Basis Litigation as a Political Strategy by the European Parliament and Member States’ (1999) 36 Common Market Law Review 1243–70Google Scholar
Curtin, D. and Leino, P. ‘In Search of Transparency for EU Law-Making: Trilogues on the Cusp of Dawn’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 1673–712Google Scholar
Davies, G. ‘Democracy and Legitimacy in the Shadow of Purposive Competence’ (2013) 21 European Law Journal 2–22Google Scholar
de Búrca, G. ‘Rethinking Law in Neofunctionalist Theory’ (2005) 12 Journal of European Public Policy 310–26Google Scholar
de Gregorio Merino, A. ‘Legal Developments in the Economic and Monetary Union during the Debt Crisis: The Mechanisms of Financial Assistance’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review 1613–46Google Scholar
de Wilde, P. and Raunio, T. ‘Redirecting National Parliaments: Setting Priorities for Involvement in EU Affairs’ (2016) 16 Comparative European Politics 310–29Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G. ‘The Confrontation between the Big Five and Big Law: Turf Battles and Ethical Debates as Contests for Professional Credibility’ (2004) 29 Law & Social Inquiry 615–38Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G. ‘State Politics and Legal Markets’ (2011) 10 Comparative Sociology 38–66Google Scholar
Dinan, D. ‘Governance and Institutions: A More Political Commission’ (2016) 52 Journal of Common Market Studies 101–16Google Scholar
Egeberg, M., Gornitzka, Å., Trondal, J. and Johannessen, M. ‘Parliament Staff: Unpacking the Behaviour of Officials in the European Parliament’ (2013) 20 Journal of European Public Policy 495–514Google Scholar
Ehlermann, C.-D. ‘The Role of Lawyers in the European Communities’ (1983) 11 International Business Lawyer 172–3Google Scholar
Esau, A. ‘Teaching Professional Responsibility in Law School’ (1988) 11 Dalhousie Law Journal 403–70Google Scholar
Faull, J. ‘In-House Lawyers and Legal Professional Privilege: A Problem Revisited’ (1998) 4 Columbia Journal of European Law 139–45Google Scholar
Fischel, D. R. ‘Lawyers and Confidentiality’ (1998) 65 University of Chicago Law Review 1–33Google Scholar
Garben, S. ‘Collective Identity as a Legal Limit to European Integration in Areas of Core State Powers’ (2020) 58 Journal of Common Market Studies 41–55Google Scholar
Garben, S. ‘Confronting the Competence Conundrum: Democratising the European Union through an Expansion of Its Legislative Powers’ (2015) 35 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 55–89Google Scholar
Goebel, R. J. ‘Introduction: A Tribute to Jean-Claude Piris, Director General of the Legal Service of the Council of the European Union’ (2011) 45 Fordham International Law Journal 1189–92Google Scholar
Goldner Lang, I. ‘The Rule of Law, the Force of Law and the Power of Money in the EU’ (2019) 15 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 1–26Google Scholar
Guerrero, A. A. ‘Lawyers, Context, and Legitimacy: A New Theory of Legal Ethics’ (2012) 25 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 107–64Google Scholar
Harrington, C. ‘Reevaluating the Duty of Confidentiality’ (2003) 47 New York Law School Law Review 423–46Google Scholar
Hobolt, S. B. ‘A Vote for the President? The Role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament Elections’ (2014) 21 Journal of European Public Policy 1528–40Google Scholar
Horn, E. ‘Logics of Political Secrecy’ (2011) 28(7–8) Theory, Culture & Society 103–22Google Scholar
Hutchinson, A. C. ‘In the Public Interest: The Responsibilities and Rights of Government Lawyers’ (2008) 46 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 105–29Google Scholar
Jacqué, J.-P. ‘Les juristes de l’Union: Aperçu sociologique’ (2011) 47 La Semaine juridique (Édition générale) 2309–16Google Scholar
Jenks, C. W. ‘Craftsmanship in International Law’ (1956) 50 American Journal of International Law 32–60Google Scholar
Kochenov, D. and Pech, L. ‘Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the European Union: Rhetoric and Reality’ (2015) 11 European Constitutional Law Review 512–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korkea-aho, E. and Leino, P. ‘Interviewing Lawyers: A Critical Self-Reflection on Expert Interviews as a Method of EU Legal Research’ (2019) 12 European Journal of Legal Studies 17–47Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘International Law: Constitutionalism, Managerialism and the Ethos of Legal Education’ (2007) European Journal of Legal Studies 1–18Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘The Politics of International Law – 20 Years Later’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 7–19Google Scholar
Kraemer, H. ‘The European Union Civil Service Tribunal: A New Community Court Examined after Four Years of Operation’ (2009) 46 Common Market Law Review 1873–913Google Scholar
Laws, S. ‘Giving Effect to Policy in Legislation: How to Avoid Missing the Point’ (2011) 32 Statute Law Review 1–16Google Scholar
Leech, , ‘Asking Questions: Techniques for Semistructured Interviews’ (2002) 35 PS: Political Science and Politics 665–8Google Scholar
Leino, P. ‘Just a Little Sunshine in the Rain: The 2010 Case Law of the European Court of Justice on Access to Documents’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 1215–52Google Scholar
Leino, P. ‘Secrecy, Efficiency, Transparency in EU Negotiations: Conflicting Paradigms?’ (2017) 5 Politics & Governance 6–15Google Scholar
Leino-Sandberg, P. and Saarenheimo, T. ‘Fiscal Stabilisation for EMU: Managing Incompleteness’ (2018) 43(5) European Law Review 623Google Scholar
Leino-Sandberg, P. and Saarenheimo, T. ‘Sovereignty and Subordination: On the Limits of EU Economic Policy Coordination’ (2017) 42(2) European Law Review 166Google Scholar
Leino, P. and Salminen, J. ‘The Euro Crisis and Its Constitutional Consequences for Finland: Is There Room for National Politics in EU Decision-Making?’ (2013) 9 European Constitutional Law Review 451–79Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K. ‘Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism’ (1990) 38 American Journal of Comparative Law 205–63Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K. ‘The Principle of Democracy in the Case Law of the Court of Justice’ (2013) 62 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 271–315Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K. and Gutierrez-Fons, J.-A. ‘To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice’ (2014) 20 Columbia Journal of European Law 3–61Google Scholar
Leslie, M. B. ‘Government Officials as Attorneys and Clients: Why Privilege the Privileged?’ (2002) 77 Indiana Law Journal 469–550Google Scholar
Lindberg, B. ‘Are Political Parties Controlling Legislative Decision-Making in the European Parliament? The Case of the Services Directive’ (2008) 15 Journal of European Public Policy 1184–204Google Scholar
Lipsius, J. ‘The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference’ (1995) 20 European Law Review 235–67Google Scholar
Lyal, R. ‘The Community Dimension in Legal Education: A Personal Perspective’ (2007) 4 European Journal of Legal Education 59–65Google Scholar
Lyal, R. ‘Compatibility of National Tax Measures with EU Law: The Role of the European Commission in Tax Litigation before the European Court of Justice’ (2015) 24 EC Tax Review 5–14Google Scholar
Madsen, M. R. ‘From Cold War Instrument to Supreme European Court: The European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics’ (2007) 32 Law & Social Inquiry 137–59Google Scholar
Madsen, M. R. ‘The International Judiciary as Transnational Power Elite’ (2014) 8 International Political Sociology 332–4Google Scholar
Maduro, M. P. ‘Interpreting European Law: Judicial Adjudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2008) 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 137–52Google Scholar
Miller, G. P. ‘Government Lawyers’ Ethics in a System of Checks and Balances’ (1987) 54 University of Chicago Law Review 1293–9Google Scholar
Mulkey, M. E. ‘A Crisis of Conscience and the Government Lawyer’ (2005) 14 Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review 649–62Google Scholar
Naurin, D. ‘The Puzzle of Transparency Reforms in the Council of the EU’ (2017) 5 Politics and Governance 87–90Google Scholar
Neuhold, C. and Dobbels, M. J. ‘Paper-Keepers or Policy Shapers? The Role of Unelected Officials in the European Parliament’ (2015) 13 Comparative European Politics 577–95Google Scholar
Noël, É. ‘Participation of the Commission in the Community Legislative Process’ (1983) 11 International Business Lawyer 164–5Google Scholar
Novak, S. ‘The Silence of Ministers: Consensus and Blame Avoidance in the Council of the European Union’ (2013) 51 Journal of Common Market Studies 1091–107Google Scholar
Oliver, P. and Stefanelli, J. ‘Strengthening the Rule of Law in the EU: The Council’s Inaction’ (2016) 54 Journal of Common Market Studies 1075–84Google Scholar
Orford, A. ‘In Praise of Description’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 609–25Google Scholar
Page, E. C. ‘Their Word Is Law: Parliamentary Counsel and Creative Policy Analysis’ (2009) Public Law 790–811Google Scholar
Paloniitty, T. and Eliantonio, M. ‘Scientific Knowledge in Environmental Judicial Review: Safeguarding Effective Judicial Protection in the EU Member States?’ (2018) 27 (4) European Energy and Environmental Law Review 108–14Google Scholar
Peterson, J. ‘Juncker’s Political European Commission and an EU in Crisis’ (2017) 55 Journal of Common Market Studies 349–67Google Scholar
Piris, J.-C. ‘Does the European Union have a Constitution? Does It Need One?’ (1999) 24 European Law Review 557–85Google Scholar
Piris, J.-C. and Maganza, G. ‘The Amsterdam Treaty: Overview and Institutional Aspects’ (1998) 22(6) Fordham International Law Journal 31–47Google Scholar
‘Rethinking the Professional Responsibilities of Federal Agency Lawyers’ (2002) 115 Harvard Law Review 1170–92Google Scholar
Ruffert, M. ‘Le bouleversement de l’Union économique et monétaire dans la crise pandémique’ (2020) 56 Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 915–30Google Scholar
Ruffert, M. ‘Europarecht für die nächste Generation: Zum Projekt Next Generation EU’ (2020) 39 Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 1777–80Google Scholar
Sands, P. ‘Torture Team: The Responsibilities of Lawyers for Abusive Interrogation’ (2008) 9 Melbourne Journal of International Law 365–80Google Scholar
Schachter, O. ‘The Invisible College of International Lawyers’ (1977–8) 72 Northwestern University Law Review 217–26Google Scholar
Schepel, H. ‘Law and European Integration: Socio-Legal Perspectives’ (2004) 17 European Union Studies Association Review 1–4Google Scholar
Schepel, H. and Wesseling, R. ‘The Legal Community: Judges, Lawyers, Officials and Clerks in the Writing of Europe’ (1997) 3 European Law Journal 165–88Google Scholar
Schusterschitz, G. and Kotz, S. ‘The Comitology Reform of 2006: Increasing the Powers of the European Parliament without Changing the Treaties’ (2007) 3 European Constitutional Law Review 68–90Google Scholar
Shelton, D. ‘The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings’ (1994) 88 American Journal of International Law 611–42Google Scholar
Simmel, G. ‘The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies’ (1906) 11 American Journal of Sociology 441–98Google Scholar
Simon, W. H. ‘The Professional Responsibilities of the Public Official’s Lawyer: A Case Study from the Clinton Era’ (2002) 77 Notre Dame Law Review 999–1022Google Scholar
Smulders, B. and Eisele, K. ‘Reflections on the Institutional Balance, the Community Method and the Interplay between Jurisdictions after Lisbon’ (2012) 31 Yearbook of European Law 112–27Google Scholar
Stein, E. ‘Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution’ (1981) 75 American Journal of International Law 1–27Google Scholar
Tait, J. C. ‘The Public Service Lawyer, Service to the Client and the Rule of Law’ (1997) 23 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 542–9Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B. Z. ‘A Socio-Legal Methodology for the Internal/External Distinction: Jurisprudential Implications’ (2006) 75 Fordham Law Review 1255–85Google Scholar
Triantafillou, P. ‘The Politics of Neutrality and the Changing Role of Expertise in Public Administration’ (2015) 37 Administrative Theory and Praxis 174–87Google Scholar
van Gestel, R. and Micklitz, H.-W. ‘Why Methods Matter in European Legal Scholarship’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal 292–316Google Scholar
Vauchez, A. ‘The Force of a Weak Field: Law and Lawyers in the Government of the European Union (For a Renewed Research Agenda)’ (2008) 2 International Political Sociology 128–44Google Scholar
Viñuales, J. E. ‘Human Rights and Investment Arbitration: The Role of Amici Curiae’ (2006) 8 Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional 231–73Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, R. ‘Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues’ (1975) 5 Human Rights 1–24Google Scholar
Webb, D. ‘Keeping the Crown’s Conscience: A Theory of Lawyering for Public Sector Counsel’ (2007) 5 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 243–60Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. ‘Europe in Crisis: On “Political Messianism”, “Legitimacy” and the “Rule of Law”’ (2012) Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 248–68Google Scholar
Wendel, W. B. ‘Government Lawyers, Democracy, and the Rule of Law’ (2009) 77 Fordham Law Review 1333–62Google Scholar
Winzen, T. ‘Technical or Political? An Exploration of the Work of Officials in the Committees of the European Parliament’ (2011) 17 Journal of Legislative Studies 27–44Google Scholar
Yong, B., Davies, G. and Leston-Bandeira, C. ‘Tacticians, Stewards and Professionals: The Politics of Publishing Select Committee Legal Advice’ (2019) 46 Journal of Law and Society 367–95Google Scholar
Yordanova, N. ‘The Rationale behind Committee Assignment in the European Parliament: Distributive, Informational and Partisan Perspectives’ (2009) 10 European Union Politics 253–80Google Scholar
Alter, K. ‘Jurist Social Movements in Europe: The Role of Euro-Law Associations in European Integration (1953–1975)’ (2007) 20(4) EUSA Review 6–12Google Scholar
Baker, S. E. and Edwards, R. (eds.), ‘How Many Qualitative Interviews Is Enough? Expert Voices and Early Career Reflections on Sampling and Cases in Qualitative Research’, National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper (Southampton: National Centre for Research Methods, 2012)Google Scholar
Besselink, L. ‘The Bite, the Bark and the Howl Article 7 TEU and the Rule of Law Initiatives’ (2016) Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance Research Paper No. 2016-01Google Scholar
Cramér, P., Larsson, O., Moberg, A. and Naurin, D. ‘See You in Luxembourg? EU Governments’ Observations under the Preliminary Reference Procedure’ (2016) Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies Report No. 5Google Scholar
Curtin, D. and Leino, P. ‘Openness, Transparency and the Right of Access to Documents in the EU: In-Depth Analysis’ (2016) EUI Research Paper RSCAS 2016/63Google Scholar
de Witte, B. ‘European Union Law: A Unified Academic Discipline?’ (2008) EUI Working Paper RCAS 2008/34Google Scholar
de Witte, B., Grant, C. and Piris, J.-C., ‘United Kingdom’s Renegotiation of Its Constitutional Relationship with the EU: Agenda, Priorities and Risks’ (European Parliament Policy Department C, 2015)Google Scholar
Fenger, N. and Grønnegård Christensen, J. ‘Åbenhed og fortrolighed i den ministerielle beslutningsproces: En redegørelse for offentlighedslovgivningens beskyttelseaf den politisk- administrative beslutningsproces i udvalgte europæiske lande’ (2017) www.regeringen.dk/media/3182/undersoegelse_af_andre_landes_aktindsigtsregler.pdfGoogle Scholar
Girndt, C. ‘Der einzige Weg ist, dem EuGH nicht zu folgen’, Interview with Fritz Scharpf, Hans Böckler Stiftung Magazin Mitbestimmung, 7/8 2008, www.boeckler.de/de/magazin-mitbestimmung-2744-aposder-einzige-weg-ist-dem-eugh-nicht-zu-folgenapos-11173.htmGoogle Scholar
Gros, D. ‘Europe and the Covid-19 Crisis: The Challenges Ahead’, CEPS, 26 November 2020, www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/europe-and-the-covid-19-crisis/Google Scholar
Karpik, L. and Halliday, T. C., ‘The Legal Complex’ (2011) Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Center on Law and Globalization Research Paper No. 11-05Google Scholar
Leino, P. ‘Transparency, Participation and EU Institutional Practice: An Inquiry into the Limits of the “Widest Possible”’ (2014) EUI Working Paper Law 2014/3Google Scholar
Novak, S. ‘Is There a Tension between Transparency and Efficiency in Decisions? The Case of the Council of the European Union’ (2011) EUI Working Paper MWP 33Google Scholar
Piris, J.-C. ‘A More United European Union to Confront the Challenges of a Less Secure World’, European Issue No. 518, 4 June 2019Google Scholar
Vauchez, A. ‘Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity’ (2013) LSE Legal Studies Working Paper 19Google Scholar
Barigazzi, J. ‘Juncker to Renzi: Brussels isn’t Berlin’s puppet’, Politico, 15 January 2016, www.politico.eu/article/juncker-to-matteo-renzi-brussels-isnt-berlin-s-puppet-migration/Google Scholar
Barker, A. ‘Blow to German banking union plan’, Financial Times, 12 September 2013, http://ig-legacy.ft.com/content/ea7c2eb6-1b90-11e3-94a3-00144feab7de#axzz6dIQEhO1XGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. ‘EU legal opinion against the FTT – Full Text’, Financial Times, 10 September 2013, www.ft.com/content/b77cfb1b-7ca3-37ea-afaa-715f4f6cf94 fGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. ‘Europe’s financial transaction tax hits legal wall’, Financial Times, 10 September 2013, www.ft.com/content/b0a6c7a8-19fd-11e3-93e8-00144feab7deGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. ‘Eurozone tax on forex is possible: leaked legal opinion’, Financial Times, 18 March 2014, www.ft.com/content/5482d09c-46e0-34e1-a4bd-e45f94607f40Google Scholar
Barker, A. ‘Leaked legal opinion on eurozone banking union’, Financial Times, 18 October 2012, www.ft.com/content/63d7c5ee-c82e-3aa6-a6a1-62587e00b988Google Scholar
Barker, A. ‘Setback for Brussels as lawyers warn on banking union plans’, Financial Times, 8 October 2013, www.ft.com/content/306c4e48-2ffe-11e3-9eec-00144feab7deGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. ‘Vickers reforms fall foul of EU lawyers’, Financial Times, 17 June 2014, www.ft.com/content/8e451f24-f590-11e3-be21-00144feabdc0Google Scholar
Bayer, L. ‘European Parliament backs plan to link EU funds to rule of law’, Politico, 17 January 2019, www.politico.eu/article/budget-hungary-poland-rule-of-law-european-parliament-backs-plan-to-link-eu-funds/Google Scholar
Beretta, E. ‘Une femme dira le droit au Conseil européen’, Le Point, 15 March 2019, www.lepoint.fr/politique/emmanuel-berretta/une-femme-dira-le-droit-au-conseil-europeen-15-03-2019-2301412_1897.phpGoogle Scholar
Birgersson, P. ‘Löfven borde frågat svenska folket’, Ystadts Allehanda, 21 July 2020, www.ystadsallehanda.se/ledare/lofven-borde-fragat-svenska-folket-e535d458Google Scholar
‘Coronavirus: France, Germany propose €500 billion recovery fund’, Deutsche Welle, 18 May 2020, www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-france-germany-propose-500-billion-recovery-fund/a-53488803Google Scholar
Dixon, H. ‘We can do better than the defunct financial transaction tax’, Financial Times, 12 September 2013, www.ft.com/content/d7196aa0-1afa-11e3-b781-00144feab7deGoogle Scholar
‘EU har blivit en skuldunion’, Nya Wermlands-Tidningen, 21 July 2020, www.nwt.se/2020/07/21/eu-har-blivit-en-skuldunion/Google Scholar
Euractive.com with Reuters, ‘Recovery fund brings EU one step closer to fiscal union’, Euractive, 28 May 2020, www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/recovery-fund-brings-eu-one-step-closer-to-fiscal-union/Google Scholar
Euractiv.com with AFP, ‘Germany’s Scholz sees “no way back” from EU joint debt’, Euractive, 24 August 2020, www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/germanys-scholz-sees-no-way-back-from-eu-joint-debt/Google Scholar
European Voice Staff, ‘An influential post’, Politico, 23 April 2014, www.politico.eu/article/an-influential-post/Google Scholar
Fontanella-Khan, J. ‘EU data protection rules hit by surprise legal objection’, Financial Times, 6 December 2013, www.ft.com/content/6930c9a6-5e8a-11e3-8621-00144feabdc0Google Scholar
Gill, J. and Chadwick, L. with AP, ‘EU summit: Leaders reach landmark €1.82 trillion COVID-19 recovery deal and budget’, Euronews, 21 July 2020 www.euronews.com/2020/07/21/eu-summit-deadlock-see-talks-stretch-into-sundayGoogle Scholar
Gotev, G. ‘Nord Stream 2, EU drifting towards legal arbitration’, Euractive, 19 July 2019, www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/nord-stream-2-eu-heading-towards-legal-arbitration/Google Scholar
Grüll, P. ‘“Frugal Four” present counter-plan to Macron-Merkel EU recovery scheme’, Euractive, 25 May 2020, www.euractiv.com/section/economy-jobs/news/frugal-four-present-counter-plan-to-macron-merkel-eu-recovery-programme/Google Scholar
Hautala, H. ‘Europe’s legal U-turn on militarising development policy’, Euractive, 3 July 2017, www.euractiv.com/section/development-policy/opinion/europes-legal-u-turn-on-militarising-development-policy/-first-trade-deal-citizens-rights/Google Scholar
Herszenhorn, D. M. ‘Brussels backlash to Martin Selmayr’s appointment’, Politico, 5 March 2018, www.politico.eu/article/martin-selmayr-european-commission-appointment-vs-the-press/Google Scholar
Herszenhorn, D. M. ‘EU’s goal in Brexit talks: divorce first’, Politico, 22 March 2017, www.politico.eu/article/eu-michel-barnier-mandate-goal-in-brexit-talks-negotiations-divorceGoogle Scholar
‘Is Legal’s legal opinion legal?’, Politico, 11 December 2013, www.politico.eu/article/is-legals-legal-opinion-legal/Google Scholar
‘Italy loses single component of Juncker: Legal expert Carlo Zadra quits after clash with Selmayr’, Anza, 5 January 2016, www.ansa.it/english/news/politics/2016/01/05/italy-loses-single-component-of-juncker_26e241dd-85fe-4562-a50a-536ab66b7b3c.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kayali, L. ‘Whistleblowers could lose out in EU tax rule shakeup’, Politico, 19 December 2018, www.politico.eu/article/leaks-on-corporate-tax-evasion-could-be-excluded-from-eu-whistleblower-protections/Google Scholar
Keating, D. ‘“I increased the power of the Commission” says Barroso’, Politico, 15 October 2014, www.politico.eu/article/i-increased-the-power-of-the-commission-says-barroso/Google Scholar
Liski, L., ‘Marin ja virkamiehet mykkäkoulussa EU-uhkauksesta – vain toinen Ylen väitteistä vahvistetaan’, Iltalehti, 3 May 2021, www.iltalehti.fi/politiikka/a/f1f3261b-888c-49db-8302-ff00e41d9038.Google Scholar
Nielsen, N. ‘EU taxpayers risk bailing out MEP pension scheme’, EU Observer, 20 February 2018, https://euobserver.com/institutional/141033Google Scholar
Pancevski, B. and Norman, L., ‘How Angela Merkel’s Change of Heart Drove Historic EU Rescue Plan: German chancellor pushed through the European Union’s agreement to offer €750 billion to help members counter coronavirus’s economic devastation’, Wall Street Journal, 21 July 2020, www.wsj.com/articles/angela-merkel-macron-covid-coronavirus-eu-rescue-11595364124Google Scholar
Peat, C. ‘EU bureaucrat Jean-Claude Juncker’s right hand man branded a “TYRANT” by furious officials’, Express, 7 January 2016, www.express.co.uk/news/politics/632345/Juncker-aide-tyrant-EU-European-Union-Italian-anger-BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Piris, J.-C., ‘Avanti tutti, Europa!’, European Voice, 29 March 2012, www.politico.eu/article/avanti-tutti-europa/Google Scholar
Plucinska, J., Posaner, J. and Heath, R. ‘Uber’s case against France stuck in Berlaymont traffic’, Politico, 16 November 2011, www.politico.eu/article/ubers-case-against-france-stuck-in-berlaymont-traffic/Google Scholar
Plucinska, J., Posaner, J. and Heath, R. ‘Uber case on hold over Le Pen fears’, Politico, 23 November 2016, www.politico.eu/article/uber-complaint-falls-into-jean-claude-junckers-black-hole/Google Scholar
Quatremer, J. ‘Martin Selmayr braque la Commission européenne’, Libération, 4 March 2018, www.liberation.fr/planete/2018/03/04/martin-selmayr-braque-la-commission-europeenne_1633807Google Scholar
Quatremer, J. ‘Selmayrgate: conflit d’intérêts, mensonges … et suicide’, Libération, 14 March 2019, www.liberation.fr/planete/2019/03/14/selmayrgate-conflit-d-interets-mensonges-et-suicide_1715168Google Scholar
Rettman, A. ‘Talks collapse on access to EU documents’, EU Observer, 13 June 2012, https://euobserver.com/institutional/116609Google Scholar
Schulz, F. and Grüll, P. ‘EU recovery deal: the summit that will cement Merkel’s legacy’, Euractive, 23 July 2020, www.euractiv.com/section/future-eu/news/angela-merkel-der-gipfel-ihrer-karriere/Google Scholar
Sjöstedt, J. ‘Vänsterpartiet KU-anmäler regeringen’, Expressen, 21 July 2020, www.expressen.se/nyheter/sjostedts-ilska-efter-eu-uppgorelsen/Google Scholar
Smith-Meyer, B. ‘ECB’s Lagarde denies pushing EU for permanent fund: European Central Bank president dismisses news reports and calls the pandemic recovery fund a “one-off”’, Politico, 28 September, www.politico.eu/article/ecbs-lagarde-denies-pushing-eu-for-permanent-fund/Google Scholar
Spiegel, P. ‘Leaked legal opinion: EU too loose with budget rules?’ Financial Times, 4 May 2015, www.ft.com/content/6d5874a4-490b-3988-a55b-79ce30f8fe67Google Scholar
Taylor, S. ‘Attaching flags to senior managers: Germans hold the most important jobs; Commission to report on mix of nationalities’, Politico, 12 April 2014, www.politico.eu/article/attaching-flags-to-senior-managers/Google Scholar
Taylor, S. ‘Feathers fly at justice council over data protection one-stop shop’, Politico, 11 December 2013, updated 28 January 2018, www.politico.eu/article/feathers-fly-at-justice-council-over-data-protection-one-stop-shop/Google Scholar
Vincenti, D. ‘EU leaders on collision course with Commission over CETA’, Euractive, 29 June 2016, www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/news/eu-leaders-on-collision-course-with-commission-over-ceta/Google Scholar
Zalan, E. ‘Poland and Hungary challenge rule-of-law tool at EU court’, EU Observer, 12 March 2021, https://euobserver.com/political/151211Google Scholar
Agence Europe, ‘“Whistleblowers” Directive, negotiations in Council will continue in 2019’, Europe Daily Bulletin No. 12162, 18 December 2018, https://agenceurope.eu/en/bulletin/article/12162/6Google Scholar
Alemanno, A. and Chamon, M. ‘To save the rule of law you must apparently break it’, Verfassungsblog, 11 December 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/to-save-the-rule-of-law-you-must-apparently-break-it/Google Scholar
‘The brexit Deal - Council Legal Service Opinion, 27 January 2021, http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-brexitdeal-council-legal-service.html?m=1.Google Scholar
Costamagna, F. and Goldmann, M., ‘Constitutional Innovation, Democratic Stagnation?: The EU Recovery Plan’, Verfassungsblog, 30 May 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-innovation-democratic-stagnation/Google Scholar
Dehousse, F. ‘Selmayr’s Appointment: Why this Juncker Crisis is Much More Dangerous for the EU Commission than the Santer Crisis in 1999: Is this a storm in a teapot?’, Verfassungsblog, 17 April 2018, https://verfassungsblog.de/selmayrs-appointment-why-this-juncker-crisis-is-much-more-dangerous-for-the-eu-commission-than-the-santer-crisis-in-1999/Google Scholar
Eckes, C. and Leino-Sandberg, P. ‘“In view of the exceptional and unique character” of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement – an Exception to Separation of Powers within the EU?’, European Law Blog, 15 April 2021, https://europeanlawblog.eu/2021/04/15/in-view-of-the-exceptional-and-unique-character-of-the-eu-uk-trade-and-cooperation-agreement-an-exception-to-separation-of-powers-within-the-eu/Google Scholar
Harakka, T. ‘Country-by-country reporting, what next?’, 2 December 2019, http://timoharakka.fi/country-by-country-reporting-what-next/Google Scholar
Hautala, H. (Vice-President of the European Parliament) Tweet on 17 April 2019, https://twitter.com/411Hautala/status/1118532806924296193?refsrc=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Eprofile%3AHeidiHautala%7Ctwcon%5Etimelinechrome&refurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heidihautala.fi%2Fen%2FGoogle Scholar
‘Interview with Christine Lagarde, President of the ECB, by Marie Charrel and Eric Albert’, European Central Bank, 19 October 2020, www.ecb.europa.eu/press/inter/date/2020/html/ecb.in201019~45f5cf8040.en.htmlGoogle Scholar
‘Interview with Marchini-Camia, Antonio’, The European Commission 1973-1986: History and Memories of an Institution, EUI Historical Archives of the European Union, Interview No. 211, recorded on 6 December 2011, https://archive.eui.eu/en/oral_history/INT211Google Scholar
Journal of European Competition Law & Practices Editorial Board, https://academic.oup.com/jeclap/pages/Editorial_BoardGoogle Scholar
‘Hubert Legal’, Concurrences, www.concurrences.com/en/auteur/Hubert-LegalGoogle Scholar
Leino, P. and Wyatt, D. ‘No public interest in whether the EU-Turkey refugee deal respects EU Treaties and international human rights?’, European Law Blog, 28 February 2018, https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/02/28/no-public-interest-in-whether-the-eu-turkey-refugee-deal-respects-eu-treaties-and-international-human-rights/Google Scholar
Leino-Sandberg, P. ‘Between European Commitment and “Taking the Law Seriously”: The EU Own Resources Decision in Finland’, Verfassungsblog, 29 April 2021, https://verfassungsblog.de/between-european-commitment-and-taking-the-law-seriously/Google Scholar
Leino-Sandberg, P. ‘New Generation EU: A Constitutional Change without Constitutional Change’, Reconnect, 13 January 2021, https://reconnect-europe.eu/blog/new-generation-eu-a-constitutional-change-without-constitutional-change/Google Scholar
Leino-Sandberg, P. ‘Who is ultra vires now? The EU’s legal U-turn in interpreting Article 310 TFEU’, Verfassungsblog, 18 June 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/who-is-ultra-vires-now-the-eus-legal-u-turn-in-interpreting-article-310-tfeu/Google Scholar
Moorhead, R. and Vaughan, S. ‘The Tournament of Influence: Professionalism, Ethics, and the In-House Lawyer’ (2019) 5 The Practice 4, https://thepractice.law.harvard.edu/article/the-tournament-of-influence/Google Scholar
Pech, L. Opinion sent 20 December 2018, www.asktheeu.org/en/request/cls_opinion_re_proposed_general#outgoing-12343Google Scholar
Pisany-Ferry, J., ‘Europe’s recovery gamble’, Bruegel, 25 September 2020, www.bruegel.org/2020/09/europes-recovery-gamble/.Google Scholar
Quatremer, J. (@quatremer), Tweet on 8 March 2018 at 3.43 pm, https://twitter.com/quatremer/status/971743133707964416Google Scholar
Rask Madsen, M. and Palmer Olson, H., ‘Legal Disintegration? The Ruling of the Danish Supreme Court in AJOS’, Verfassungsblog, 30 January 2017, https://verfassungsblog.de/legal-disintegration-the-ruling-of-the-danish-supreme-court-in-ajos/Google Scholar
Requena, L. R. Curriculum vitae, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/pdf/romero_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Šadl, U. ‘When is a Court a Court’, Verfassungsblog, 20 May 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/when-is-a-court-a-court/Google Scholar
Scheppele, K. L., Pech, L. and Kelemen, R. D. ‘Never Missing an Opportunity to Miss an Opportunity: The Council Legal Service Opinion on the Commission’s EU budget-related rule of law mechanism’, Verfassungsblog, 12 November 2018, https://verfassungsblog.de/never-missing-an-opportunity-to-miss-an-opportunity-the-council- legal-service-opinion-on-the-commissions-eu-budget-related-rule-of-law-mechanism/Google Scholar
Schinas, M. Tweet response to Jean Quatremer, https://twitter.com/margschinas/status/971757406958080000Google Scholar
‘Selmayrgate: Or why the Secretary-General job matters’, Corporate Europe Observatory, 20 March 2018, https://corporateeurope.org/en/power-lobbies/2018/03/selmayrgate-or-why-secretary-general-job-mattersGoogle Scholar
Tavares Lanceiro, R. ‘The Portuguese Constitutional Court judgment 422/2020 – a “Solange” moment?’, EU Law Live, 24 July 2020, https://eulawlive.com/op-edthe-portuguese-constitutional-court-judgment-422-2020-a-solange-momentby-rui-tavares-lanceiro/Google Scholar
van den Brink, T. ‘National Parliaments and the Next Generation EU Recovery Fund’, EU Law Live, Weekend edition No. 36, 7 November 2020, https://eulawlive.com/weekend-edition/weekend-edition-no36/, pp. 21–8Google Scholar
Weiler, J. ‘Dispatch from the Euro Titanic: And the Orchestra Played On [EJIL Editorial]’, EJIL:Talk!, 2 February 2011, www.ejiltalk.org/dispatch-from-the-euro-titanic-and-the-orchestra-played-on-ejil-editorial/Google Scholar
Barroso, J. M. ‘Uniting in peace: the role of Law in the European Union’, Doc. No. Speech/06/213, 31 March 2006, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_06_213Google Scholar
Garzón Clariana, G. ‘Building a role for the Jurisconsult of the European Parliament and the Legal Service’, presentation to the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Annual Conference, June 2019 (on file with author)Google Scholar
Juncker, J.-C. ‘A New Start for Europe: My Agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change Political Guidelines for the next European Commission’, Opening Statement in the European Parliament Plenary Session, Strasbourg, 15 July 2014Google Scholar
Pennera, C. (Jurisconsult) Address at the farewell reception in his honour held in Strasbourg on 22 October 2013 (on file with author)Google Scholar