Planning, Proposing, and Presenting Science Effectively A Guide for Graduate Students and Researchers in the Behavioral Sciences and Biology
Further reading
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2010
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Planning, Proposing, and Presenting Science EffectivelyA Guide for Graduate Students and Researchers in the Behavioral Sciences and Biology, pp. 216 - 219Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
(1996). The Craft of Scientific Writing, 3rd edn. New York: Springer. [Examples of strong and weak scientific writing and suggestions for improving one's own.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). The Craft of Scientific Presentations: Critical Steps to Succeed and Critical Errors to Avoid. New York: Springer. [Presentations.]Google Scholar
American Psychological Association (2001). Publication Manual of the APA, 5th edn. Washington, DC: APA. [A style manual followed not only by the many periodicals of the APA itself but also by several other journals. More than half a million copies in print.]
(1994). Dazzle 'Em with Style: The Art of Oral Scientific Presentations. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co. [Communicating and lecturing.]Google Scholar
and (1994). Essentials of Modern Research Methods in Health, Physical Education, and Recreation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Research and methodology in special biological areas, and technical writing.]Google Scholar
(2005). The Art of Scientific Investigation. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press. [Originally published in 1950, a time-honored work on doing science, with many good examples of inductive reasoning.]Google Scholar
(1980). Seeds of Discovery: A Sequel to The Art of Scientific Investigation. New York: Norton. [More of Beveridge's germane analyses; see previous reference.]Google Scholar
(1990). Something Old, Something New: College Writing Teachers and Classroom Change. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. [Writing and rhetoric in education.]Google Scholar
(1993). Communicating in Science: Writing a Scientific Paper and Speaking at Scientific Meetings, 2nd edn. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press [Communicating, lecturing, and writing.]Google Scholar
. (1992). Reading as Rhetorical Invention: Knowledge, Persuasion, and the Teaching of Research-based Writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. [Rhetoric and reading.]Google Scholar
(1995). Preparing Scientific Illustrations: A Guide to Better Posters, Presentations, and Publications, 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag. [Visual presentations and publications.]Google Scholar
(1992). The Art of Science: A Practical Guide to Experiments, Observations, and Handling Data. San Diego, CA: HighText Publications. [Experimentation, methodology, laboratory.]Google Scholar
(1965). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 148:754–9. [A reprint of Thomas C. Chamberlin's 1890 article from Science (old series) in which he artfully describes how to consider alternative hypotheses without bias.]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1994). Elements of Graphing Data. Murray Hill, NJ: AT&T Bell Laboratories. [A standard comprehensive treatise on graphing.]Google Scholar
and (1993). Dissertations and Theses from Start to Finish: Psychology and Related Fields. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. [Practical suggestions for psychology graduate students.]Google Scholar
and (eds.) (1994). The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [Storage and retrieval systems, general and statistical methods.]Google Scholar
Council of Biology Editors (1994). Scientific Style and Format: The CBE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers, 6th edn. New York: Cambridge University Press. [A standard guide for writing in biology.]
(2004). Scientific Papers and Presentations. New York: Academic Press. [Writing and presenting science.]Google Scholar
Dawkins, M. S. and M. Gosling (eds.) (1992). Ethics in Research on Animal Behaviour. London: Academic Press for the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour and the Animal Behavior Society. [Reprintings of eight articles originally appearing in the journal Animal Behaviour, including the revised guidelines for the use of animals in research, with an introduction by the editors.]
(1998). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, 5th edn. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. [Writing and publishing in scientific journals; a widely used reference.]Google Scholar
(1995). Scientific English: A Guide for Scientists and Other Professionals, 2nd edn. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. [Guide to technical writing.]Google Scholar
and (2000). Writing Successful Science Proposals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. [Proposal writing.]Google Scholar
(1983). Presenting Science to the Public. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press. [Treats a related topic beyond the bounds of this book; a very complete guide.]Google Scholar
and (1984). The Experience of Science. New York: Plenum Press. [Discusses hypotheses, precision, accuracy, and other relevant topics for scientists.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). How to Write and Illustrate a Scientific Paper. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Writing and, especially, presenting figures.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. [Communicating and technical writing.]Google Scholar
(1992). Working Research: Strategies for Inquiry. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Problem-solving, research methodology, and technical writing.]Google Scholar
(1974). The International (SI) Metric System and How It Works, 2nd edn. Tarzana, CA: Polymetric Services. [A book of nearly 300 pages on the SI system of numbers and units.]Google Scholar
(1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [A famous book, the first edition of which defended more strongly than did the revision the thesis that science advances mainly through discarding old models for wholly new ones.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1966). The case for the passive voice. Nature 381:467. [Objections to blanket advice for always writing in the active voice.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Handbook of Ethological Methods, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Classic descriptions of ethological sampling methods.]Google Scholar
(1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp. [Language and languages in education and science.]Google Scholar
(2001). A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press. [Writing English.]Google Scholar
and (1992). Successful Lab Reports: A Manual for Science Students. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Laboratory report writing.]Google Scholar
(1990). LIMS: Applied Information Technology for the Laboratory. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. [Laboratory management, data processing, and information systems.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007). Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, 3rd edn. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. [Methodology in studies of animal behavior.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science (Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Writing and presentations; also includes communicating with the public.]Google Scholar
O'Connor, M. and F. P. Woodford (1975). Writing Scientific Papers in English: An ELSE-Ciba Foundation Guide for Authors. The Hague: Ciba Foundation. [A guide conceived for writers whose first language is not English but very useful to native English speakers. Reprinted in 1977 by Elsevier/Excerpta Medica/North Holland.]
and (2002). Research Proposals: A Guide to Success, 3rd edn. New York: Academic Press. [Proposal writing and review process.]Google Scholar
(1964). Strong inference. Science 146:347–53. [An influential paper urging that the hypothetico-deductive method be applied more explicitly in all branches of science.]
and (eds.) (1992). Constructing Rhetorical Education. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. [Language and teaching.]Google Scholar
, , and (1980). Smith's Guide to the Literature of the Life Sciences, 9th edn. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing Co. [Although outdated and apparently no longer periodically revised, this remains a useful entry into biological literature searching and has special chapters on graduate theses.]Google Scholar
(1981). How to Complete and Survive a Doctoral Dissertation. New York: St Martin's Press. [Includes tips on many unexpected problems that graduate students may encounter.]Google Scholar
and (2000). The Elements of Style, 4th edn. New York: Longman. [The parsimonious classic on grammar and usage, comprising the lecture notes of Professor William Strunk (1869–1946) as originally edited by his once-student, the US essayist E. B. White (1899–1985), who added an introduction and a chapter on writing. This edition includes a foreword by R. Angell.]Google Scholar
(1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [How language can be used in research and teaching. One reviewer of our book in manuscript especially recommended the way this author discusses the purpose of a paper's introduction.]Google Scholar
(2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd edn. Cheshire, CTGraphics Press. [One of several works by Tufte that have become standard reference material; see next reference.]Google Scholar
(2003). Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. [A concise guide to presenting data visually, mainly with reference to computer interfacing; the 2003 edition is its ninth edition.]Google Scholar
University of Chicago Press (1987). Chicago Guide to Preparing Electronic Manuscripts for Authors and Publishers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Now outdated because of the rapid advances in microcomputer hardware and software, but most of the basic material remains valid.]
University of Chicago Press (2003). The Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Arguably the best-known standard of style manuals since the first edition in 1906.]
US Government Printing Office (2000). Style Manual. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. [The standard manual for writing by federal employees, updated at long intervals; especially known for its detailed treatment of syllabification and hyphenation, which in the days of typewriters was a critical issue for breaking up words at the ends of lines.]
(1993). Succeeding in science: some rules of thumb. Science 261:1812–13. [Advice from a Nobel laureate, who says to avoid dumb people, take risks, have someone back you up, and never do anything that bores you. See also the news article on grantsmanship in the pages preceding Watson's article.]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1995). The Elements of Information Gathering: A Guide for Technical Communicators, Scientists, and Engineers. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. [Communicating, technical information, storage and retrieval systems.]Google Scholar