Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:51:23.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Δίκαιος as a christological descriptor: Acts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

Peter Doble
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

In the previous chapter, most of Luke's uses of δíκαιος were examined, but there remain four occasions when he used this word to refer specifically to Jesus. Of these one, Luke 23.47, is that verse whose ‘meaning’ is the focus of this whole enquiry, consequently it will not be analysed in this section. The others are found in Acts 3.14; 7.52 and 22.14. Their distribution is of interest in that they belong to what Conzelmann wrote of as the period of the Church. Luke assigns these uses of δíκαιος to Peter, Stephen and Paul, and always in a Jewish context.

These occurrences of δíκαιος have been thoroughly explored by commentators, but the present approach – seeking a pool of meaning on which the evangelist drew – allows further comment, largely because it differs from what has frequently been the case: there seems to be wide agreement that δíκαιος is explained best as a title or quality of the messiah, a term drawn from Deutero-Isaiah's 'ebed Yahweh and (or) from 1 Enoch. This study's approach differs from the apparent consensus in that it proceeds on the principle that there are no synonyms:

The first principle of semantic analysis of lexical items is that there are ‘no synonyms,’ in the sense that no lexical items ever have completely the same meanings in all of the contexts in which they might occur. Even if two lexical items seem not to be distinguishable in their designative or denotative meanings, they do differ in terms of their connotative or associative meanings. This principle of ‘no synonyms’ may also be stated in terms of the fact that no two closely related meanings ever occur with exactly the same range of referents, much less the same set of connotative or associative features.

(Louw and Nida, p. xv)
Type
Chapter
Information
The Paradox of Salvation
Luke's Theology of the Cross
, pp. 127 - 160
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×