Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2024
Introduction
This chapter provides a descriptive analysis of 21st century criminal justice remodelling, including the ways in which digital technology has been adopted in the English and Welsh justice system, and some of the ramifications for digital data dissemination and publication. We will draw out connections between digitalisation and the principle of open justice as the chapter progresses. We focus on aspects of HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS)’s much criticised and delayed £1.3bn programme of modernisation and digital reform commenced in 2016 (HMCTS 2023c; Public Accounts Committee 2023). These include: the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) for the prosecution of minor offences, video-enabled justice (VEJ), aka virtual, or remote, courts in which some or all participants engage in hearings remotely, as well as digitalisation of data processes. We discuss the ways in which the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the use of remote hearings in criminal justice, and the continuation of these methods.
We consider the implications of these changes for traditional approaches to criminal justice system accountability, and open justice, in particular. To what extent do digital court processes enable participants and the public to engage in the justice system and hold it to account? How, for example, is information about an entirely administrative or virtual process communicated to the public? This chapter also considers the digital context outside the court room: how is justice system data being collected, processed and disseminated online, by different public and private sector actors?
In this chapter, we also look at equality of access to digital justice systems, in terms of funding, technological and legal literacy, as well as access to tools. In this context, we discuss power relationships and how technology is changing the dynamic and interactions of the digital and physical court room, making participation and engagement more difficult and undermining system accountability.
Single Justice Procedure
We begin our review of major reforms to summary criminal justice and open justice with the Single Justice Procedure (SJP). As a result of Part 3, Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, adults charged with summary only non-imprisonable offences may have their case dealt with in writing without ever attending court. The SJP allows people to enter pleas in writing or online. If the person pleads guilty using the SJP, the case is considered in camera by a single magistrate and legal adviser, but without either prosecuting or defending lawyers attending court.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.