Book contents
- Non-Competition Interests in EU Antitrust Law
- Global Competition Law and Economics Policy
- Non-Competition Interests in EU Antitrust Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Definitions
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction and Methodology
- 2 History of Article 101 TFEU Balancing
- 3 Article 101(3) TFEU
- 4 Block Exemption Regulations
- 5 Article 101(1) TFEU
- 6 National Balancing Tools
- 7 Enforcement Discretion
- 8 Conclusion
- Book part
- Laws, Regulations, Reports, and Policy Papers
- Case Law
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 June 2022
Book contents
- Non-Competition Interests in EU Antitrust Law
- Global Competition Law and Economics Policy
- Non-Competition Interests in EU Antitrust Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Definitions
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction and Methodology
- 2 History of Article 101 TFEU Balancing
- 3 Article 101(3) TFEU
- 4 Block Exemption Regulations
- 5 Article 101(1) TFEU
- 6 National Balancing Tools
- 7 Enforcement Discretion
- 8 Conclusion
- Book part
- Laws, Regulations, Reports, and Policy Papers
- Case Law
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Non-Competition Interests in EU Antitrust LawAn Empirical Study of Article 101 TFEU, pp. 517 - 540Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Abrams, N. (1971). Internal policy: guiding the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, UCLA Law Review, 19, 1–58.Google Scholar
Akpinar, M. (2017). The exercise of power in inter-organisational relationships in response to changes in the institutional environment: cases from the European automotive industry, International Journal of Automotive Technology, 17(1), 51–71.Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T. A. (1986). Constitutional law in the age of balancing, The Yale Law Journal, 96(5), 943–1005.Google Scholar
Algemene Rekenkamer (2006–2007). Toezicht op mededinging door de NMa (Official Publication No. Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 2006–2007, 31055, nrs 1–2).Google Scholar
Almunia, J. (2010). Competition v regulation: Where Do the Roles of Sector Specific and Competition Regulators Begin and End? Brussels: Speech in Center on Regulation in Europe (CERRE), 23 March 2010.Google Scholar
Almunia, J. (2013). Remedies, Commitments and Settlements in Antitrust. Brussels: Speech in SV Kartellrecht, 8 March 2013.Google Scholar
Anderman, S. D. and Kallaugher, J. (2006). Technology Transfer and the New EU Competition Rules: intellectual Property Licensing after Modernisation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andriychuk, O. (2010). Dialectical antitrust: an alternative insight into the methodology of the EC competition law analysis, European Competition Law Review, 31(4), 155–165.Google Scholar
Andriychuk, O. (2012). The dialectics of competition law: sketching the Ordo-Austrian approach to antitrust, World Competition, 35(2), 355–384.Google Scholar
Ashurst (2005). Modernisation of German Competition Law: the 7th Amendment of the GWB, Competition Law Update. Available at: www.ashurst.com/doc.aspx?id_Content=1926.Google Scholar
Baarsma, B. and Rosenboom, N. (2015). A veritable tower of Babel: on the confusion between the legal and economic interpretations of Article 101(3) of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union, European Competition Journal, 11(2–3), 402–425.Google Scholar
Bacon, K. (1997). State regulation of the market and EC competition rules: articles 85 and 86 compared, European Competition Law Review, 18, 283–291.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. (2004). Scope of judicial review under Article 81 EC, Common Market Law Review, 41(5), 274–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D. (2014). United Kingdom. In Kellezi, P., Kilpatrick, B. and Kobel, P., eds., Antitrust for Small and Middle Size Undertakings and Image Protection from Non-Competitors. Springer, pp. 235–256.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. (2016). Reinvigorating the role of Article 101(3) under regulation 1/2003, Antitrust Law Journal, 81(1), 111–144.Google Scholar
Baquero Cruz, J. (2007). The state action doctrine. In Amato, G. and Ehlermann, C.-D., eds., EC Competition Law: a Critical Assessment. Hart, pp. 551–590.Google Scholar
Baxter, W. F. (1982). Separation of powers, prosecutorial discretion, and the common law nature of antitrust law, Texas Law Review, 60, 661–703.Google Scholar
Bellamy, C. and Child, G. D. (2013). Bellamy & Child European Union Law of Competition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berthol-Balladur, L. and Anselin, Y. (2014). The Paris court of appeal partially annuls the competition authoritys decision in the packaged flour case due to the lack of by object infringement in its national component, Concurrences, (72338).Google Scholar
Bishop, S. (2001). Modernisation of the rules implementing Articles 81 and 82. In Ehlermann, C.-D. and Atansiu, I., eds., European Competition Law Annual 2000: the Modernisation of EC Antitrust Policy. Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 55–65.Google Scholar
Bishop, S. and Walker, M. (2010). The Economics of EC Competition Law. Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Black, J. (2001). Managing discretion. Paper Presented at the Australian Law Reform Conference Penalties: Policy, Principles and Practice in Government Regulation, Sydney, June.Google Scholar
Black, O. (1997). Per se rules and rules of reason: what are they?, European Competition Law Review, 18, 145–161.Google Scholar
Blake, H. M. and Jones, W. K. (1965). In defense of antitrust, Columbia Law Review, 65(3), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco, L. O. and De Pablo, A. L. (2012). EU competition law enforcement elements for a discussion on effectiveness and uniformity, Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute, 2012, 45–104.Google Scholar
Blockx, J. (2018). The impact of EU antitrust procedure on the role of the EU courts (1997–2016), Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9(2), 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomme, E. (2007). State action as a defense against 81 and 82 EC, World Competition, 30(2), 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeger, N. (2007). Solidarity and EC competition law, European Law Review, 32(3), 319.Google Scholar
Böge, U. (2001). The discussion on the modernisation of EC antitrust policy: an update on the Bundeskartellamts point of view. In Ehlermann, C.-D. and Atanasiu, I. eds., European Competition Law Annual 2000: the Modernisation of EC Antitrust Policy. Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 67–73.Google Scholar
Bork, R. H. (1978). The Antitrust Paradox: a Policy at War with Itself, 1st ed., Bork Publishing LLC.Google Scholar
Bork, R. H. (1993). The Antitrust Paradox: a Policy at War with Itself, 2nd ed., The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bork, R. H. and Bowman, W. S. (1965). The Crisis in Antitrust. Columbia Law Review, 65(3), 363–376.Google Scholar
Boronkay, M. and Molnár, B. (2009). Current developments in member states: Hungary, European Competition Journal, 5(3), 872–874.Google Scholar
Botta, M., Svetlicinii, A. and Bernatt, M. (2015). The assessment of the effect on trade by the national competition authorities of the ‘new’ member states: another legal partition of the internal market?, Common Market Law Review, 52(5), 1247–1275.Google Scholar
Boudou, M. et al. (2014). France. In Këllezi, P., Kilpatrick, B. and Kobel, P., eds., Antitrust for Small and Middle Size Undertakings and Image Protection from Non-Competitors. Springer, pp. 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, S. (2016). Is a trade union an undertaking under EU competition law? European Competition Journal, 12(2–3), 320–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodley, J. F. (1987). The economic goals of antitrust: efficiency, consumer welfare, and technological progress, NYU Law Review, 62, 1020–1053.Google Scholar
Brook, O. (2019). Struggling with Article 101(3) TFEU: diverging approaches of the commission, EU courts, and five competition authorities. Common Market Law Review, 56(1), 121–156.Google Scholar
Brook, O. (2020). Priority setting as a double-edged sword: how modernization strengthened the role of public policy. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 16(4), 435–487.Google Scholar
Brownsword, R. and Goodwin, M. (2012). Law and Technologies of the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brownsword, R. and Somsen, H. (2009). Law, innovation and technology: before we fast forward—a forum for debate. Law, Innovation and Technology, 1(1), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buch-Hansen, H. and Wigger, A. (2010). Revisiting 50 years of market-making: the neoliberal transformation of European competition policy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(1), 20–44.Google Scholar
Budzinski, O. (2003). Pluralism of competition policy paradigms and the call for regulatory diversity, Philipps-University of Marburg Volkswirtschaftliche Beiträge, 14.Google Scholar
Burnley, R. (2002). Interstate trade revisited-the jurisdictional criterion for Articles 81 and 82 EC. European Competition Law Review, 23(5), 217–226.Google Scholar
Butenko, A. and Larouche, P. (2015). Regulation for innovativeness or regulation of innovation? Law, Innovation and Technology, 7(1), 52–82.Google Scholar
Buttigieg, E. (2009). Competition Law: Safeguarding the Consumer Interest. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.Google Scholar
Byers, S. (2000). Letter from the Rt Hon Stephen Byers, MP, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldeucom/94/9419.htm.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D. and Moss, D. A. Eds. (2013). Preventing Regulatory Capture: special Interest Influence and how to Limit it. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carree, M., Günster, A. and Schinkel, M. P. (2010). European antitrust policy 1957–2004: an analysis of commission decisions. Review of Industrial Organization, 36(2), 97–131.Google Scholar
Castillo de la Torre, F. (2005). State action defence in EC competition law. World Competition, 28(4), 407–416.Google Scholar
Cengiz, F. (2010a). Alrosa v. Commission and Commission v. Alrosa: rule of Law in Post-Modernisation EU Competition Law Regime. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1674345.Google Scholar
Cengiz, F. (2010b). Multi-level governance in competition policy- the European competition network. European Law Review, 35(5), 660-677.Google Scholar
Chung, C. (1995). The relationship between state regulation and EC competition law: two proposals for a coherent approach. European Competition Law Review, 16(2), 87–97.Google Scholar
Cicala, A., Haegeman, K. and Cuff, R. (2018). From Metro to Coty - a story to be continued? the CJEUs judgment in Coty Germany GMBH. Italian Antitrust Review, 4(2), 99–111.Google Scholar
Claassen, R. and Gerbrandy, A. (2016). Rethinking European competition law: from a consumer welfare to a capability approach. Utrecht Law Review, 12(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. M. (1940). Toward a concept of workable competition. American Economic Review, 30(2), 241–56.Google Scholar
Cleynenbreugel, P. (2014). Article 101 TFEU and the EU Courts: Adapting legal form to the realities of modernization? Common Market Law Review, 51, 1381–1436.Google Scholar
Colangelo, M. (2016). Parity clauses and competition law in digital marketplaces: the case of online hotel booking. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 8(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
Colino, S. M. (2010). Recent changes in the regulation of motor vehicle distribution in Europe–Questioning the logic of sector-specific rules for the car industry. Competition Law Review, 6(2), 203–224.Google Scholar
Combe, E., Monnier, C. and Legal, R. (2008). Cartels: the probability of getting caught in the European Union. Bruges European Economic Research (BEER) Papers 12.Google Scholar
Costa-Cabral, F. (2020). Future-Mapping the Three Dimensions of EU Competition Law: modernisation Now and After COVID-19. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3581535.Google Scholar
Costa-Cabral, F. and Lynskey, O. (2017). Family ties: the intersection between data protection and competition in EU law. Common Market Law Review, 54(1), 11–50.Google Scholar
CPI. (2019). EU: 19 countries call for new antitrust rules to create ‘European champions’. Competition Law International, of 18 December 2019. Available at: https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/eu-19-countries-call-for-new-antitrust-rules-to-create-european-champions/.Google Scholar
da Cruz, V. J. L. (2018). The intensity of judicial review in complex economic matters—recent competition law judgments of the court of justice of the EU. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 6(2), 173–188.Google Scholar
Csépai, B. (2015). The ceasefire is over. European Competition Law Review, 36(9), 404–405.Google Scholar
Cseres, K. (2007a). Multi-jurisdictional competition law enforcement: the interface between European competition law and the competition laws of the new member states. European Competition Journal, 3(2), 465–502.Google Scholar
Cseres, K. (2007b). The controversies of the consumer welfare standard. Competition Law Review, 3(2), 121–173.Google Scholar
Cseres, K. (2013). Integrate or separate – institutional design for the enforcement of competition law and consumer law. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2200908.Google Scholar
Cseres, K. (2014). Accession to the EUs competition law regime: a law and governance approach Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 7(9), 31–65.Google Scholar
Cseres, K. (2020). ‘Acceptable’ cartels at the crossroads of EU competition law and the common agricultural policy: a legal inquiry into the political, economic, and social dimensions of (strengthening farmers) bargaining power, The Antitrust Bulletin, 2020, 1–22.Google Scholar
Cseres, K. and Mendes, J. (2014). Consumers access to EU competition law procedures: outer and inner limits. Common Market Law Review, 51(2), 483–521.Google Scholar
Cseres, K. and Outhuijse, A. (2017). Parallel enforcement and accountability: the case of EU competition law. In Miroslava, S. and Luchtman, M., eds., Law Enforcement by EU Authorities: Implications for Political and Judicial Accountability. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 82–114.Google Scholar
Daskalova, V. (2015). Consumer welfare in EU competition law: what is it (not) about? Competition Law Review, 11(1), 133–162.Google Scholar
Davies, S. and Ormosi, P. (2013). The Impact of Competition Policy: what are the Known Unknowns? Available at: http://competitionpolicy.ac.uk/documents/107435/107587/13-7+complete.pdf.Google Scholar
Davies, S. W. and Ormosi, P. (2010). Assessing competition policy: methodologies, gaps and agenda for future research. CCP Working Paper 10-19.Google Scholar
De Brauw, W. B. (2011). Dutch De minimis exemption for hardcore infringements in line with EU law, Competition Newsletter. Available at: http://documents.lexology.com/b0af9024–75a2–4034-9d1a-f3b8eb55e7af.pdf.Google Scholar
Deiberova, K. and Nyssens, H. (2009). The new general block exemption eegulation (GBER): what changed? European State Aid Law Quarterly, 8(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
Diaz, F. E. G. (1996). The notion of ancillary restraints under EC competition law. Fordham International Law Journal, 19(3), 951–998.Google Scholar
Don, H. (2010). Public interests! What public interests? And how to deal with them? In Amicorum, L. and Kalbfleisch, P., eds., The Art of Supervision, Liber Amicorum Pieter Kalbfleisch. Netherlands Competition Authority.Google Scholar
Doren, G. B. and Wilks, S. (1996). Comparative Competition Policy: national Institutions in a Global Market. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Drahos, M. (2001). Convergence of competition laws and policies. In Drahos, M., ed., The European Community: Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands, 26 vols. Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Dreher, M. and Korner, J. (2014). Geremany. In Këllezi, P., Kilpatrick, B. and Kobel, P., eds., Antitrust for Small and Middle Size Undertakings and Image Protection from Non-Competitors. Springer, pp. 129–140.Google Scholar
Drexl, J. (2008). Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Drexl, J. (2010). Competition law as part of the European constitution. In Von Bogdandy, A. and Bast, J., eds., Principles of European Constitutional Law, 2nd Rev. ed. Hart Publishing, pp. 633–674.Google Scholar
Dunne, N. (2014a). Between competition law and regulation: hybridized approaches to market control. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2(2), 225–269.Google Scholar
Dunne, N. (2014b). Commitment decisions in EU competition law. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 10(2), 399–444.Google Scholar
Dunne, N. (2014c). Recasting competition concurrency under the enterprise and regulatory reform act 2013. The Modern Law Review, 77(2), 254–276.Google Scholar
Dunne, N. (2016). Convergence in competition fining practices in the EU. Common Market Law Review, 53(2), 453–492.Google Scholar
Dunne, N. (2020). Public interest and EU competition law. The Antitrust Bulletin, 1–26.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H. (1986). Workable antitrust policy. Michigan Law Review, 84(8), 1696–1713.Google Scholar
Eckert, S. (2018). Two spheres of regulation: balancing social and economic goals, Regulation & Governance, 12, 117–191.Google Scholar
Ehlermann, C.-D. (1996). Implementation of EC competition law by national anti-trust authorities. European Competition Law Review, 17(2), 88–95.Google Scholar
Ehlermann, C.-D. (2000). The modernization of EC antitrust policy a legal and cultural revolution. Common Market Law Review, 37(2000), 537–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlermann, C.-D. and Atanasiu, I. (2001). European Competition Law Annual 2000: the Modernisation of EC Antitrust Policy. Hart publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elzinga, K. G. (1977). The goals of antitrust: other than competition and efficiency, what else counts? University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 125(6), 1191–1213.Google Scholar
Enchelmaier, S. (2012). Mandatory requirements under Art 101(3) TFEU: the complementary relationship between EU competition and free movement law. Competition Law Journal, 11(3), 182–199.Google Scholar
Essens, O., Gerbrandy, A. and Lavrijssen, S. (2009). National Courts and the Standard of Review in Competition Law and Economic Regulation. Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Evans, A. (1981). European competition law and consumers: The Article 85 (3) exemption. European Competition Law Review, 2, 425–437.Google Scholar
Evans, A. (1985). Article 85(3) exemption: the notion of allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefits. In Goyens, M., ed., EC Competition Policy and the Consumer Interest: proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Consumer Law, held in Louvain-la-Neuve, on May 10 and 11, 1984. Bruylant, Brussels, pp. 99–119.Google Scholar
Ezrachi, A. (2015). The competitive effects of parity clauses on online commerce. European Competition Journal, 11(2–3), 488–519.Google Scholar
Ezrachi, A. (2016). Sponge. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement. The University of Oxford Centre for Competition Law and Policy Working Paper CCLP (L), 42. Chicago, 5(1), pp. 49–75.Google Scholar
Ezrachi, A. (2017). The ripple effects of online marketplace bans. World Competition, 40(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Fair Trade Foundation, (2019). Competition Law and Sustainability – A Study of Industry Attitudes Towards Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration in the UK Grocery Sector. Available at: https://www.fairtrade.org.uk/resources-library/researching/policy-resources/competition-law-and-sustainability/.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. and Katz, M. L. (2006). The economics of welfare standards in antitrust. Competition Policy International, 2, 3–28.Google Scholar
Faure, and, M. and Bergh, R. Van den (1995). Restrictions of competition on insurance markets and the applicability of EC antitrust law, Kyklos, 48(1), 65–85.Google Scholar
Felsö, F., Baarsma, B. and Mulder, J. D. W. E. (2007). Cooperation for tenders: is it a threat to competition? Advancing public procurement, 71-96. In Thai, K. V. and Piga, G., eds., Advancing Public Procurement: Practices, Innovation, and Knowledge Sharing. Boca Raton, pp. 71–96.Google Scholar
Fingleton, J. et al. (2017). The implications of Brexit for UK competition law and policy. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 13(3), 389–422.Google Scholar
Fletcher, A. (2020). Market investigations for digital platforms: panacea or complement? Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(1), 44–55.Google Scholar
Foer, A. A. (2006). The goals of antitrust: thoughts on consumer welfare in the US. In Marsden, P., ed., Handbook of Research in Trans-Atlantic Antitrust. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 266–593.Google Scholar
Foer, A. A. and Durst, A. (2018). The multiple goals of antitrust. The Antitrust Bulletin, 63(4), 494–508.Google Scholar
Forrester, I. (1994). Competition structures for the 21st century. In Hawk, B. E., ed., Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute. Kluwer Law International, pp. 445–503.Google Scholar
Forrester, I. (2001). The modernisation of EC antitrust policy: compatibility, efficiency, legal security. In Ehlermann, C.-D., and Atansiu, I., eds., European Competition Law Annual 2000: The Modernisation of EC Antitrust Policy, pp. 75–110.Google Scholar
Forrester, I. (2006). Where law meets competition: is wouters like a cassis de Dijon or a Platypus. In Ehlermann, C.-D., and Atanasiu, I., eds., European Competition Law Annual 2004: the Relationship between Competition Law and the (Liberal) Professions. Hart Publishing, pp. 271–294.Google Scholar
Forrester, I. (2008). Creating new rules or closing easy cases: policy consequences for public enforcement of settlements under Article 9 of regulation 1/2003. In Ehlermann, C.-D., and Marquis, M., eds., European Competition Law Annual, pp. 637–661.Google Scholar
Forrester, I. (2011). A challenge for Europe’s judges: the review of fines in competition cases, European Law Review, 36(2), 185–207.Google Scholar
Forrester, I. and Norall, C. (1984). Laicization of community law: self-help and the rule of reason: how competition law is and could be applied. Common Market Law Review, 21(1), 11–51.Google Scholar
Franck, J.-U. (2017). Defining the leeway for business cooperation- remaining peculiarities under German competition law after its Europeanisation. Paper Presented at the Fifth International Conference ‘Business Networks and Competition Law’, University of Valencia, 20–21 Octo.Google Scholar
Frazer, T. (1990). Competition policy after 1992: the next step. The Modern Law Review, 53(5), 609–623.Google Scholar
Freeman, P. (2008). Is Competition Everything? Talk at the Law Society on 21 July 2008. Available at: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/28498545/Peter-Freeman-Speech-at-the-Law-Society-European-Group---Is.Google Scholar
Frese, M. (2014). Sanctions in EU Competition Law: principles and Practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Friederiszick, H. W. and Maier-Rigaud, F. P. (2008). Triggering inspections ex officio: moving beyond a passive EU cartel policy, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 4(1), 89–113.Google Scholar
Galligan, D. J. (1990). Discretionary Powers – A Legal Study of Official Discretion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
GCLC Annual Conference (2010). Towards an Optimal Enforcement of Competition Rules in Europe: time for a Review of Regulation 1/2003? Edited by Merola, M. and Waelbroeck, D. F.. Groupe de Boeck.Google Scholar
Geradin, D. (2000). Introduction. In Geradin, D., ed., The Liberalization of State Monopolies in the European Union and Beyond. Kluwer Law International, pp. ix–xii.Google Scholar
Geradin, D. (2006). Efficiency claims in EC competition law and sector-specific regulation the evolution of European competition law: whose regulation, which competition? In Ullrich, H., ed., The Evolution of European Competition Law: Whose Regulation, Which Competition? Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Geradin, D. and Henry, D. (2004). Competition law in the new member states – where do we come from? Where do we go? In Modernisation and Enlargement: Two Major Challenges for EC Competition Law. Intersentia nv, pp. 273–310.Google Scholar
Geradin, D. and Henry, D. (2005). The EC fining policy for violations of competition law: an empirical review of the commission decisional practice and the community courts’ judgments. European Competition Journal, 1(2), 401–473.Google Scholar
Geradin, D. and Petit, N. (2005). Judicial remedies under EC competition law: complex issues arising from the modernization process. In Hawk, B. E., ed., Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute. Juris Publishing, pp. 393–439.Google Scholar
Geradin, D. and Petit, N. (2012). Judicial review in European Union competition law: a quantitative and qualitative assessment. In Merola, M. and Derenne, J., eds., The Role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Competition Law Cases. Bruylant, pp. 21–72.Google Scholar
Gerard, D. (2010). EU competition policy after Lisbon: time to review the ‘state action doctrine’? Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 1(3), 202–210.Google Scholar
Gerard, D. (2011). Breaking the EU antitrust enforcement deadlock: re-empowering the courts? European Law Review, 36(4), 457–479.Google Scholar
Gerard, D. (2012). The effects-based approach under Article 101 TFEU and its paradoxes: modernisation at war with itself? In Bourgeois, J. and Waelbroeck, D., eds., Ten Years of Effects-Based Approach in EU Competition Law Enforcement. Brussels: Bruylant, pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
Gerard, D. (2013). Negotiated remedies in the modernization era: the limits of effectiveness. In Lowe, P., Marquis, M. and Monti, G., eds., European Competition Law Annual. Hart Publishing, pp. 139–183.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. J. (1994a). Constitutionalizing the economy: German neo-liberalism, competition law and the ‘new’ Europe. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 42(1), 25–84.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. J. (1994b). The transformation of European community competition law. Harvard International Law Journal, 35, 97–147.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. J. (1998). Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: protecting Prometheus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. J. (2008). Two forms of modernization in European competition law, Fordham International Law Journal, 31(5), 1235–1265.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. J. (2009). Competition law and the institutional embeddedness of economics. In Drexl, J., Idot, L. and Moneger, J., eds., Economic Theory and Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. J. (2012). The goals of European competition law: some distortions in the literature - comment on Parret. In Zimmer, D., ed., The Goals of Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
Gerbrandy, A. (2015). Addressing the legitimacy problem for competition authorities taking into account non-economic values: the position of the Dutch competition authority, European Law Review, 5, 769–781.Google Scholar
Gerbrandy, A. (2017). Solving a sustainability-deficit in European competition law. World Competition, 40(4), 539–562.Google Scholar
Gerbrandy, A., Janssen, W. and Thomsin, L. (2019). Shaping the social market economy after the Lisbon treaty: how social is public economic law. Utrecht Law Review, 15(2), 32–46.Google Scholar
Gerbrandy, A. and Lachnit, E. (2013). Bid-rigging with gingerbread candy: adventures in the land of the Dutch construction cartel. In Rodger, B., ed., Landmark Cases in Competition Law Around the World in Fourteen Stories. Kluwer Law International, pp. 203–231.Google Scholar
German Commercial Law Firms, J. (2017). DEAL DES MONATS 11/17: Auf Kurs gebracht, Allen & Overy und Blomstein steuern Kieler Werft in ein Korvetten-Konsortium. Available at: https://www.juve.de/rechtsmarkt/rechtsmarkt-ausgaben-2017/deal-des-monats-1117.Google Scholar
German Monopolies Commission (2000). Cartel policy change in the European Union? On the European commission’s white paper of 28th April 1999. Special report by the German Monopolies Commission pursuant to Sec. 44, para. 1 of the Act Against Restraints of Competition (GWB). Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.Google Scholar
Gerse, J. E. (2010). Designing agencies. In Farber, D. A. and OConnell, J., eds., Handbook on Public Choice and Public Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, p. 333.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, D. and Haar, D. (2014). Resolving conflicts between competition and other values: the roles of courts and other institutions in the US and the EU. In Lowe, P. and Marquis, M., eds., European Competition Law Annual. Hart Publishing, pp. 417–435.Google Scholar
Gippini-Fournier, E. (2008). The Modernisation of European Competition Law: First Experiences with Regulation 1/2003. Community Report to the FIDE Congress 2008.Google Scholar
Graham, C. (2009). Judicial review of the decisions of the competition authorities and the economic regulators in the UK, In Essens, O., Gerbrandy, A. and Lavrijssen, S., eds., National Courts and the Standard of Review in Competition Law and Economic Regulation. Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Graupner, F. (2007). The battle over the role of European competition policy: now you see it, now you don’t, Competition Law Journal, 6(2), 89.Google Scholar
Graupner, R. (1965). German antitrust law. English translation. The Rules of Competition in the European Economic Community. Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Graupner, R. (2012). The Rules of Competition in the European Economic Community: a study of the Substantive Law on a Comparative Law Basis with Special Reference to Patent Licence Agreements and Sole Distributorship Agreemen. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Green, N. (1988). Article 85 in perspective: stretching jurisdiction, narrowing the concept of a restriction and plugging a few gaps. European Competition Law Review, 9(2), 190–206.Google Scholar
Von der Groeben, H. (1961). ‘Policy on competition in the European Economic Community. Supplement to the Bulletin of the European Economic Community 7-8/61’.Google Scholar
Von der Groeben, H. (1987). The European Community, The formative years. The struggle to establish the Common Market and the Political Union (1958-66). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Groves, P. J. (1995). What ever she brings we sing: DG IV Rebukes the car industry. European Competition Law Review 1, 16(2), 98–103.Google Scholar
Gyselen, L. (1984). Vertical restraints in the distribution process: strength and weakness of the free rider rationale under EEC competition law. Common Market Law Review, 21(4), 647–668.Google Scholar
Gyselen, L. (1989). State action and the effectiveness of the EEC Treaty’s competition provisions. Common Market Law Review, 26(1), 33–60.Google Scholar
Gyselen, L. (1993). Anti-competitive state measures under the EC Treaty: towards a substantive legality standard. European Law Review Competition, Supp Comp, 55–89.Google Scholar
Gyselen, L. (1994). The emerging interface between competition policy and environmental policy in the EC. In Cameron, J., Demaret, P. and Geradin, D., eds., Trade and the Environment: The Search for Balance. Cameron May.Google Scholar
Gyselen, L. (2000). Case C-67/96, Albany v. Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds textielindustrie; joined cases C-115-117/97, Brentjens’ Handelsonderneming v. Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds voor de handel in bouwmaterialen; and case C-219/97, Drijvende Bokken v. Stichting Pensio. Common Market Law Review, 37(2), 425–448.Google Scholar
Gyselen, L. (2002). The substantive legality test under Article 81-3 EC treaty—revisited in light of the commission’s modernization initiative. In von Bogdanady, A., Mavroidis, P. C. and Mény, Y., eds., European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann. Kluwer Law International, pp. 181–197.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Hall, M. (2011). Coding Case Law for Public Health Law Evaluation. Public Health Law Research: Theory and Methods.Google Scholar
Hall, M. and Wright, R. (2008). Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions. California Law Review, 96(1), 63–122.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. E. (2011). When is an antitrust authority not aggressive enough in fighting cartels. International Journal of Economic Theory, 7(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
Hauteclocque, A. de (2009). Legal uncertainty and competition policy in European deregulated electricity markets: the case of long-term exclusive supply contracts. World Competition, 32(1), 91–112.Google Scholar
Hawk, B. E. (1972). Antitrust in the EEC - the first decade. Fordham Law Review, 41(2), 229–292.Google Scholar
Hawk, B. E. (1988). The American (anti-trust) revolution: lessons for the EEC. European Competition Law Review, 9(1), 53–87.Google Scholar
Hawk, B. E. (1995). System failure: vertical restraints and EC competition law, Common Market Law Review, 32(4), 973–989.Google Scholar
Hegymegi-Barakonyi, Z. et al. (2009). Hungary Report to the LIDC Conference 2009. Available at: http://www.ligue.org/index.php?page=vienna-september-2009.Google Scholar
Heide-Jorgensen, C. (2013). The relationship between Articles 101(1) TFEU and 101(3) TFEU. In Heide-Jorgensen, C., ed., Aims and Values in Competition Law. Copenhagen: Djøf Publishing, pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
Heinz, S. (2016). Online booking platforms and EU competition law in the wake of the German Bundeskartellamts booking.com infringement decision. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 7(8), 530–536.Google Scholar
Heitzer, B. (2008). Consumer welfare as a standard of competition policy. Speech in the European Competition Day.Google Scholar
Hengeler Mueller Weitzel Wirtz Law Firm (2000). German Antitrust Law. English Translation. Available at: http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/GWB.htm.Google Scholar
Holmes, M. and Davey, L. (2007). A Practical Guide to National Competition Rules Across Europe, 2nd ed. Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (2020). Climate change, sustainability, and competition law. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 8, 354–405.Google Scholar
Hornsby, S. B. (1987). Competition policy in the 80s: more policy less competition. European Law Review, 12(2), 79–101.Google Scholar
Horváth, B. and Tóth, T. (2016). Antitrust Cases in the Financial Services Sector – An Overview of Seminal Hungarian and EU Cases. Nr. 2016/6.Google Scholar
House of Lords Select Committee on Regulators. (2007). UK Economic Regulators. 1st Report of Session 2006–07. Available at:http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldselect/ldrgltrs/189/189i.pdf.Google Scholar
Van Houtte, B. (1982). Standard of reason in EEC antitrust law: some comments on the application of parts 1 and 3 of Article 85. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 4(2), 497–516.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, H. (1982). Distributive justice and the antitrust laws. George Washington Law Review, 51(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, H. (1985). Antitrust policy after Chicago. Michigan Law Review, 84(2), 213–284.Google Scholar
Hunold, M. (2016). Best price clauses: what policy as regards online platforms? Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 8(2), 119–125.Google Scholar
Hyman, D. A. and Kovacic, W. E. (2013). Competition agencies with complex policy portfolios: divide or conquer? Concurrences, 9(9).Google Scholar
Ibáñez Colomo, P. (2010). On the application of competition law as regulation: elements for a theory. Yearbook of European Law, 29(1), 261–306.Google Scholar
Ibáñez Colomo, P. (2012). Market failure, transaction costs and Article 101 (1) TFUE case law, European Law Review, 5, 541–562.Google Scholar
Ibáñez Colomo, P. (2013). Three shifts in EU competition policy: towards standards, decentralization, settlements. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 20(3), 363–384.Google Scholar
Ibáñez Colomo, P. (2018). The Shaping of EU Competition Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ibáñez Colomo, P. and Kalintiri, A. (2020). The evolution of EU antitrust policy: 1966–2017. The Modern Law Review, 83(2), 321–372.Google Scholar
Ibáñez Colomo, P. and De Pablo, A. L. (2017). On the notion of restriction of competition: what we know and what we don’t know we know. In Gerard, D., Merola, M. and Meyring, B., eds., The Notion of Restriction of Competition: revisiting the Foundations of Antitrust Enforcement in Europe. Bruylant.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, A. (2015). A re-evaluation of the concept of economic activity for the purpose of EU competition rules: the need for modernisation. European Competition Journal, 11(1), 265–286.Google Scholar
Idot, L. (2015). Reform of regulation 1/2003: power to set priorities. Concurrences, 3 –2015, 51–58.Google Scholar
Israel, A. and Jakobs, M. (2015). Germany: challenges from new online practices to established competition law principles, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 6(8), 588–594.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, A. (1999). Theories of industrial organization and competition policy. In Competition, Efficiency, and Welfare. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 199–222.Google Scholar
Janssen, C. and Kloosterhuis, E. (2016). The Wouters case law, special for a different reason? European Competition Law Review, 37(8), 335–339.Google Scholar
Jennings, H. (2015). Prioritisation in antitrust enforcement – a finger in many pies. Competition Law International, 1, 29.Google Scholar
Jenny, F. (1990). French competition policy in perspective. In George, K. et al. eds., Competition Policy in Europe and North America: Economic Issues and Institutions. Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 146–188.Google Scholar
Jenny, F. (2015). Worst decision of the EU court of justice: the Alrosa judgment in context and the future of commitment decisions. Fordham International Law Journal, 38(3), 701–770.Google Scholar
Jenny, F. (2016). The institutional design of competition authorities: debates and trends. In Jenny, F. and Katsoulacos, Y., eds., Competition Law Enforcement in the BRICS and in Developing Countries. Springer, Cham, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
Joliet, R. (1967). The Rule of Reason in Antitrust Law; American, German and Common Market Laws in Comparative Perspective. Springer.Google Scholar
Joliet, R. (1988). National anti-competitive legislation and community law. Fordham International Law Journal, 12(2), 163–188.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (2010). The journey toward an effects-based approach under Article 101 TFEU—the case of hardcore restraints. The Antitrust Bulletin, 55(4), 783–818.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (2017). Brexit: Implications for UK Competition Law. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2923725.Google Scholar
Jones, A. and Sufrin, B. E. (2008). EC Competition Law: text, Cases, and Materials, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, P. (2011). Aiming for alliance: competition law and consumer welfare. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2(2), 108–116.Google Scholar
Kalintiri, A. (2016). What’s in a name? The marginal standard of review of ‘complex economic assessments’ in EU competition enforcement. Common Market Law Review, 53(5), 1283–1316.Google Scholar
Kassim, H. and Wright, K. (2009). Bringing regulatory processes back in: the reform of EU antitrust and merger control. West European Politics, 32(4), 738–755.Google Scholar
Kauper, T. E. (1987). The Sullivan approach to horizontal restraints. California Law Review, 75(3), 893–916.Google Scholar
Keyte, J. (2017). Interview with professors eleanor fox and William Kovacic. Antitrust, 31(2), 18–27.Google Scholar
Kieran, F. (2013). A separation of powers approach to non-efficiency goals in EU competition law. European Public Law, 19(1), 189–208.Google Scholar
Kingston, S. (2001). A ‘new division of responsibilities’ in the proposed regulation to modernise the rules implementing Articles 81 and 82 EC? A warning call. European Competition Law Review, 22(8), 340–350.Google Scholar
Kingston, S. (2010). Integrating environmental protection and EU competition law: why competition isn’t special. European Law Journal, 16(6), 780–805.Google Scholar
Kingston, S. (2011). Greening EU Competition Law and Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kjolbye, L. (2004). The new commission guidelines on the application of Article 81 (3): an economic approach to Article 81. European Competition Law Review, 81(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
Klees, A. (2006). Breaking the habits: the German competition law after the 7th amendment to the act against restraints of competition (GWB). German Law Journal, 7(4), 399–420.Google Scholar
Kleine, M. and Rübel, C. (2015). Germany. In Thill-Tayara, M., ed., Pharmaceutical Antitrust in 29 Jurisdictions Worldwide. Globel Competition Review, pp. 68–74.Google Scholar
Kloosterhuis, E. (2017). Defining non-economic activities in competition law. European Competition Journal, 13(1), 117–149.Google Scholar
Komninos, A. (2005). Non-competition Concerns: resolution of Conflicts in the Integrated Article 81 EC. University of Oxford, Working Paper (L) 8.05.Google Scholar
Korah, V. (1981a). Comfort letters-reflections on the perfume cases. European Law Review, 6, 14–39.Google Scholar
Korah, V. (1981b). The rise and fall of provisional validity-the need for a rule of reason in EEC antitrust. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 3, 320–357.Google Scholar
Korah, V. (2001). The interface between intellectual property and antitrust: the European experience. Antitrust Law Journal, 69(3), 801–839.Google Scholar
Korah, V. (2004). An Introductory Guide to EC Competition Law and Practice. Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Kort, F. (1963). Content analysis of judicial opinions and rules of law. In Schubert, G. A. and Aubert, V., eds., Judicial Decision Making. Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 133–197.Google Scholar
Kovacic, W. E. (2003). The modern evolution of US competition policy enforcement norms. Antitrust Law Journal, 71, 377–478.Google Scholar
Kovacic, W. E. (2015a). A case for capping the dosage: leniency and competition authority governance. In Beaton-Welles, C. and Tran, C., eds., Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: leniency Religion. Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 123–135.Google Scholar
Kovacic, W. E. (2015b). Creating a respected brand: how regulatory agencies signal quality. George Mason Law Review, 22(2), 237–259.Google Scholar
Kovacic, W. E. (2020). Market structure and market studies. In Choi, J. P., Lim, W. and Lee, S.-H., eds., Competition Law and Economics Developments, Policies and Enforcement Trends in the US and Korea. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 30–50.Google Scholar
Kovacic, W. E., Hollman, H. M. and Grant, P. (2011). How does your competition agency measure up? European Competition Journal, 7(1), 25–45.Google Scholar
Kovacs, A., Tóth, T. and Forgacs, A. (2016). Effects of European soft law at national administrative courts. Loyola University Chicago International Law Review, 14(1), 1.Google Scholar
Kovács, C. and Reindl, A. P. (2013). he evolution of the Hungarian competition regime: 2 decades of dynamic change and continuity. In Lewis, D., ed., Building New Competition Law Regimes: Selected Essays. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 26–80.Google Scholar
Kroes, N. (2005). European competition policy – delivering better markets and better choices. Speech in the European Consumer and Competition Day London, 15 September 2005.Google Scholar
Kroes, N. (2007). Fact-based competition policy – the contribution of sector inquiries to better regulation, priority setting and detection. Speech in the 13th International Conference on Competition and the 14th European Competition Day SPEECH/07/186. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-07-186_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Kroes, N. (2009). Many achievements, more to do. Opening speech at international bar association conference: ‘private and public enforcement of EU competition law – 5 years on’. SPEECH/09/106 given at the International Bar Association conference, Brussels.Google Scholar
Kuenzler, A. and Warlouzet, L. (2013). National traditions of competition law: a belated Europeanization through convergence?. In K. K. P. and Schweitzer, H., ed., The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, K. U. (1997). Germany. In Graham, E. M. and Richardson, J. D., eds., Global Competition Policy. Peterson Institute.Google Scholar
Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (1991). The politics of government decision-making: a theory of regulatory capture. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1089–1127.Google Scholar
Landes, W. M. and Posner, R. A. (1975). The private enforcement of law. Journal of Legal Studies, 4, 1–46.Google Scholar
Lanza, E. (2015). Mixed bodies and competition: balancing public measures and private interests. A snapshot of the API’s judgment. Italian Antitrust Review, 2(1), 193–197.Google Scholar
Larouche, P. (2013). Legal emulation between regulatory competition and comparative law. In Larouche, P. and Cserne, P., eds., National Legal Systems and Globalization. TMC Asser Press, pp. 247–287.Google Scholar
Lasserre, B. (2009). The new French competition law enforcement regime. Competition Law International, 5, 15–20.Google Scholar
Lavrijssen, S. (2009). More intensive judicial review in competition law and economic regulation in the Netherlands. In Essens, O., Gerbrandy, A. and Lavrijssen, S., eds., National Courts and the Standard of Review. Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Lavrijssen, S. (2010). What role for national competition authorities in protecting non-competition interests after Lisbon? European Law Review, 35(5), 636–659.Google Scholar
Lawlor, R. C. (1968). Fact content analysis of judicial opinions Jurimetrics Journal, 8(4), 107–130.Google Scholar
Lester, M. (2009). UK Report to the LIDC Conference 2009. Available at: http://www.ligue.org/index.php?page=vienna-september-2009.Google Scholar
Levitt, M. and Ziegler, C. (2014). The European commission’s extension of the liner shipping consortia block exemption regulation until April 2020. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 5(10), 696–670.Google Scholar
Lianos, I. (2013). Some reflections on the question of the goals of EU competition law. In Lianos, I. and Geradin, D., eds., Handbook on European Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–84.Google Scholar
Lianos, I. et al. (2014). An optimal and just financial penalties system for infringements of competition law: a comparative analysis. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2542991.Google Scholar
Lianos, I. et al. (2017). Brexit and Competition Law. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3077221.Google Scholar
Lianos, I. (2018). Polycentric competition law. Current Legal Problems, 71(1), 161–213.Google Scholar
Lianos, I. (2019). The future of competition policy in Europe-some reflections on the interaction between industrial policy and competition law. CLES Policy Paper Series.Google Scholar
Lianos, I. and Genakos, C. (2013). Econometric evidence in EU competition law: an empirical and theoretical analysis. In Lianos, I. and Geradin, D., eds., Handbook on European Competition Law: enforcement and Procedure. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Lianos, I. and Geradin, D. (2013). Handbook on European Competition Law: enforcement and Procedure. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Liefmann, R. (1932). Cartels, Concerns and Trusts, History of Economic Thought Books. Methuen.Google Scholar
Lista, A. (2013). EU Competition Law and the Financial Services Sector. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Loozen, E. (2019). Strict competition enforcement and welfare: a constitutional perspective based on Article 101 TFEU and sustainability. Common Market Law Review, 56(5), 1265–1302.Google Scholar
Lowe, P. (2008). The design of competition policy institutions for the 21st century – the experience of the European commission and DG competition. Competition Policy Newsletter, 3, 1–11.Google Scholar
Mackenrodt, M. O. (2019). Price and condition parity clauses in contracts between hotel booking platforms and hotels IIC – international review of intellectual property and competition law. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 50(9), 1131–1143.Google Scholar
Maher, I. (2002). Networking competition authorities in the European Union: diversity and change. In C. D. E. and I. A. eds., European Competition Law Annual. Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 223–236.Google Scholar
Maier-Rigaud, F. (2012). On the normative foundations of competition law: efficiency, political freedom and the freedom to compete. In Zimmer, D., ed., The Goals of Competition Law. ASCOLA Com. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 132–168.Google Scholar
de la Mano, M. and Jones, A. (2018). Vertical agreements under EU competition law: proposals for pushing Article 101 analysis, and the modernization process, to a logical conclusion. In Healey, D. and Jacbos, M., eds., Handbook of Research Methods of Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Manzini, P. (2002). The European rule of reason-crossing the sea of doubt. European Competition Law Review, 23(8), 392–399.Google Scholar
Marcos, F. and Sanchez-Graells, A. (2010). A missing step in the modernisation stairway of EU competition law–any role for block exemption regulations in the realm of regulation 1/2003? The Competition Law Review, 6(2), 183–201.Google Scholar
Markham, J. W. (1950). An alternative approach to the concept of workable competition. The American Economic Review, 40(3), 349–361.Google Scholar
Massadeh, A. (2015). Empirical Assessment of Public Enforcement of Competition Law: Criteria and Three Case Studies (EU, UK and France). Dissertation.Google Scholar
Maziarz, A. (2014). Do non-economic goals count in interpreting Article 101(3) TFEU? European Competition Journal, 10(2), 341–359.Google Scholar
Mehta, P. (2006). Competition regimes in the world: a civil society report, in. Available at: https://scholar.google.nl/scholar?hl=en&q=competition+regimes+in+the+world+-+a+civil+society+report&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=#0.Google Scholar
Meij, A. (2009). Judicial review in the EC courts: Tetra Laval and beyond. In Essens, O., Gerbrandy, A. and Lavrijssen, S., eds., National Courts and the Standard of Review in Competition Law and Economic Regulation. Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Melamed, A. D. and Petit, N. (2019). The misguided assault on the consumer welfare standard in the age of platform markets. Review of Industrial Organization, 54, 741–774.Google Scholar
Mendes, J. (2014). Law, public interest and interpretation: prolegomena of a normative framework on administrative discretion in the EU. Yale Law & Economics Research Paper.Google Scholar
Merkin, R. and Williams, K. (1980). Competition act 1980. The Modern Law Review, 43(4), 429–440.Google Scholar
Mestmäcker, E. J. (2000). The EC commissions modernization of competition policy: a challenge to the community’s constitutional order. European Business Organization Law Review, 1(3), 401–444.Google Scholar
van Miert, K. (1993). Competition policy in the 1990s. Speech for the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House, London), 11 May 1993.Google Scholar
Monti, G. (2002). Article 81 EC and public policy. Common Market Law Review, 37, 1057–1099.Google Scholar
Monti, G. (2008). Managing the intersection of utilities regulation and EC competition law. Competition Law Review, 4(2), 123–145.Google Scholar
Monti, G. (2013). Restraints on selective distribution agreements. World Competition, 36, 489–511.Google Scholar
Monti, G. (2014a). Independence, interdependence and legitimacy: The EU commission, national competition authorities, and the European competition network, SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at: http://awards.concurrences.com/IMG/pdf/ssrn-id2379320.pdf.Google Scholar
Monti, G. (2014b). Legislative and executive competences in competition law. In Azoulai, L., ed., The Question of Competence in the European Union. Oxford University Press, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar
Monti, G. (2017). The United Kingdom’s contribution to European Union competition law. Fordham International Law Journal, 40(5), 1443–1474.Google Scholar
Monti, G. and Mulder, J. (2017). Escaping the clutches of EU competition law. European Law Review, 42(2), 635–656.Google Scholar
Monti, M. (2000a). Competition in a Social Market Economy, Speech at the Conference of the European Parliament and the European Commission on ‘Reform of European Competition law’ in Freiburg on 9/10 November 2000.Google Scholar
Monti, M. (2000b). Guest editorial: a European competition policy for today and tomorrow. World Competition. Kluwer Law International, 23(2), 1–4.Google Scholar
Monti, M. (2000c). The application of Article 81(3) by ntional courts. Speech in Trier, 27 November 2000.Google Scholar
Monti, M. (2003). European competition policy: Quo Vadis? XX. International Forum on European Competition Policy.Google Scholar
Monti, M. (2004). Convergence in EU-US antitrust policy regarding mergers and acquisitions: an EU perspective. Speech in the UCLA Law First Annual Institute on US an EU Antitrust Aspects of Mergers and Acquisitions (Los Angeles, 28.2.2004).Google Scholar
Morgan, B. and Yeung, K. (2007). An Introduction to Law and Regulation: Text and Materials. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, E. and McGuire, S. (2004). Transatlantic divergence: GE–Honeywell and the EUs merger policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(1), 39–56.Google Scholar
Mortelmans, K. (2001). Towards convergence in the application of the rules on free movement and on competition? Common Market Law Review, 38(3), 613–649.Google Scholar
Moses, L. B. (2013). How to think about law, regulation and technology: problems with ‘technology’ as a regulatory target. Law, Innovation and Technology, 5(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Motta, M. (2004). Competition Policy: theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, R., Heidenhain, M. and Schneider, H. (1991). German Antitrust Law: An Introduction to the German Antitrust Law with German Text and Synoptic. Juris Puc Inc. Fritz Knapp Verlag.Google Scholar
Mundt, A. (2020). The Bundeskartellamt in times of COVID-19: adaption of workflows and implications for our enforcement practice. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 8(2), 253–255.Google Scholar
Muris, T. (2003). State Intervention/State Action-A US Perspective. Fordham Corporate Law Institute New York, Law and Economics Working Paper Series. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=545163.Google Scholar
Nagy, C. I. (2017). The concept of anti-competitive object under EU competition law: comparative perspectives and European realities. In Almășan, A. and Whelan, P., eds., The Consistent Application of EU Competition Law: substantive and Procedural Challenges. Springer, pp. 55–70.Google Scholar
National Audit Office, T. (2010). Review of the UKs Competition Landscape. Available at: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/0910_competition_landscape.pdf.Google Scholar
National Audit Office, T. (2016). The UK Competition Regime. Available at: https://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-uk-competition-regime/.Google Scholar
Nazzini, R. (2006). Article 81 EC between time present and time past: a normative critique of ‘restriction of competition’ in EU law. Common Market Law Review, 81(1), 497–536.Google Scholar
Nazzini, R. (2011). The Foundations of European Union Competition Law: the Objective and Principles of Article 102. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, P. (2005). The balancing myth: the economics of Article 81 (1) & (3). Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 32(2), 123–145.Google Scholar
Norberg, S. (2007). Making a virtue out of necessity and at the same time Strengthening European competition law enforcement. How the white paper on the modernisation reform came about. In Liechtenstein, P. N. of et al. eds., Economic Law and Justice in Times of Globalisation. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, pp. 523–542.Google Scholar
Nowag, J. (2015). Wouters, when the condemned live longer: a comment on OTOC and CNG. European Competition Law Review, 36(1), 39–44.Google Scholar
Nowag, J. (2016). Environmental Integration in Competition and Free-Movement Laws. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OLoughlin, R. (2003). EC competition rules and free movement rules: an examination of the parallels and their furtherance by the ECJ Wouters decision. European Competition Law Review, 24(2), 62–69.Google Scholar
Odudu, O. (2005). The meaning of undertaking within 81 EC. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 7, 209–239.Google Scholar
Odudu, O. (2006). The Boundaries of EC Competition Law: The Scope of Article 81. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Odudu, O. (2008). Developing private enforcement in the EU: lessons from the Roberts court. Antitrust Bulletin, 53, 873–902.Google Scholar
Odudu, O. (2020). Feeding the nation in times of crisis: the relaxation of competition law in the United Kingdom. Competition Law Journal, 19(2), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, A. (1995). Rethinking self-regulation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15(1), 97–108.Google Scholar
Olsen, G. and Roy, B. (2006). The new world of proactive EC antitrust enforcement - sector inquiries by the European commission. Antitrust, 21(3), 82–88.Google Scholar
Orbach, B. Y. (2011). The antitrust consumer welfare paradox. Journal of Competition Law and EconomicsEconomics, 7(1), 133–164.Google Scholar
Ottow, A. (2015). Market and Competition Authorities: good Agency Principles. Oxford Scholarship Online.Google Scholar
De Pablo, A. L. (2011). The slow death of Article 101(3). Chillin’ Competition blog, 28.10.2011. Available at: https://chillingcompetition.com/2011/10/28/the-slow-death-of-article-1013/.Google Scholar
De Pablo, A. L. (2015). In no man’s land- case T-355/13, easyJet. Chilling Competition Blog. Available at: https://chillingcompetition.com/2015/01/27/in-no-mans-land-case-t-35513-easyjet/.Google Scholar
Pace, L. (2007). European Antitrust Law-Prohibitions, Merger Control and Procedures. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Papp, M. (2017). Application of EU competition law by the Hungarian judiciary: cooperation with the ECJ and relying on the case law of the ECtHR. In Almășan, A. and Whelan, P., eds., The Consistent Application of EU Competition Law. Springer, pp. 255–270.Google Scholar
Parret, L. (2009). Do we (still) know what we are protecting? The discussion on the objectives of competition law from different perspectives. TILEC Discussion paper 2009–10.Google Scholar
Parret, L. (2012). The multiple personalities of EU competition law: time for a comprehensive debate on its objectives. In Zimmer, D., ed., The Goals of Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 61–84.Google Scholar
Patel, K. and Schweitzer, H. (2013). The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Paz, J. (2014). Understanding the limits of judicial review in European competition law. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2(1), 203–224.Google Scholar
Peeperkorn, L. (2003). IP licences and competition rules: striking the right balance. World Competition, 26(4), 527–539.Google Scholar
Peeperkorn, L. (2016). Coherence in the application of Articles 101 and 102: a realistic prospect or an elusive goal? World Competition, 39(3), 389–411.Google Scholar
Pera, A. (2008). Changing views of competition, economic analysis and EC antitrust law, European Competition Journal, 4(1), 127–168.Google Scholar
Pérez, S. M. R. and van de Scheur, S. (2013). The evolution of the law on Articles 85 and 86 EEC [Articles 101 and 102 TFEU] ordoliberalism and its Keynesian challenge. In Patel, K. K. and Schweitzer, H., eds., The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law. Oxford University Press, pp. 19–53.Google Scholar
Perroud, T. (2013). Administrative law and competition: how administrative law protects the market? Leviathan as an ordinary market player in Europe? Jean Monnet Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Petit, N. (2009). The guidelines on the application of Article 81(3) EC: a critical review. Working Paper 4/1009 Institut détudes juridiques Européennes, Liège.Google Scholar
Petit, N. (2010). How much discretion do, and should, competition authorities enjoy in the course of their enforcement activities? A multi-jurisdictional assessment. Concurrences: revue des Droits de la Concurrence, 1, 44–62.Google Scholar
Petit, N. (2011). The Perverse Effects of the Courts Ruling in Tele2 Polska. Available at: http://chillingcompetition.com/2011/06/17/the-perverse-effects-of-the-courts-ruling-in-tele2-polska/.Google Scholar
Petit, N. and Rabeux, L. (2009). Judicial review in French competition law and economic regulation. In Essens, O., Gerbrandy, A. and Lavrijssen, S., eds., National Courts and the Standard of Review in Competition Law and Economic Regulation. Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Petit, N. and Rato, M. (2008). From hard to soft enforcement of EC competition law – a bestiary of ‘sunshine’ enforcement systems. In Gheur, C. and Petit, N., eds., Alternative Enforcement Techniques in EC Competition Law: settlements, Commitments and Other Novel Instruments. Bruylant, pp. 183–220.Google Scholar
Piergiovanni, M. and DElia, P. (2008). Self-assessment of agreements under Article 81 EC: is there a need for more commission guidance. Global Competition Policy, OCT-08 (2)(2).Google Scholar
Pina, Á. (2014). Enhancing Competition and the Business Environment in Hungary. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/enhancing-competition-and-the-business-environment-in-hungary_5jz2pwfr0nzq-en.Google Scholar
Pitofsky, R. (1979). Political content of antitrust. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127(4), 1051–1075.Google Scholar
Pittman, R. (2004). Competition agencies and the restructuring of formally planned economics: lessons form the experience of central and eastern Europe. In Geradin, D., ed., Modernisation and Enlargement: Two Major Challenges for EC Competition Law. Intersentia nv.Google Scholar
Polański, J. (2014). Informant Reward Schemes in Competition Enforcement. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2457450.Google Scholar
Policy Studies Institute (1989). Government measures in the United Kingdom from 1945 to 1980. In Appendix D to Innovation and Industrial Strength In the UK, West Germany, United States and Japan. Available at: http://www.psi.org.uk/publications/archivepdfs/Innovation and Indust/APPD.pdf.Google Scholar
Porrini, D. (2016). Which consequences in the insurance market for the end of the block exemption. Italian Antitrust Review, 2, 160–173.Google Scholar
Potter, W. J. and Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258–284.Google Scholar
de Pree, J. and Molin, S. (2013). Netherlands. In Cartel Regulation: the Application of Competition Regulation in 48 Jurisdictions Worldwide. Global Competition Review.Google Scholar
Prek, M. and Lefèvre, S. (2016). Competition litigation before the general court: quality if not quantity? Common Market Law Review, 53(1), 65–90.Google Scholar
Prosser, T. (2010). EU competition law and public services. In Mossialos, E., ed., Health Systems Governance in Europe: the Role of European Union Law and Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raban, O. (2010). The fallacy of legal certainty: why vague legal standards may be better for capitalism and liberalism. Public International Law Journal, 19.Google Scholar
Rabinovici, I. (2016). Public exchange of information after container shipping. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 8(3), 149–156.Google Scholar
Refworld (1990). Constitution of the Republic of Hungary (repealed 1989), English Translation. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b4e714.html.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M., Macrory, S. and Chowdhury, M. (2009). EU competition policy in the financial crisis: extraordinary measures. Fordham International Law Journal, 33(1), 1670–1731.Google Scholar
Riesenfeld, S. (1960). The legal protection of competition in France. California Law Review, 48(4), 574–595.Google Scholar
Riley, A. (2003a). EC antitrust modernisation: the commission does very nicely—thank you! Part one: regulation 1 and the notification Burden. European Competition Law Review, 24(11), 604–615.Google Scholar
Riley, A. (2003b). EC antitrust modernisation: the commission does very nicely—thank you! Part two: between the idea and the reality: decentralisation under regulation. European Competition Law Review, 24(12), 657–672.Google Scholar
Riley, A. (2007). The EU reform treaty and the competition protocol: undermining EC competition law. European Competition Law Review, 12, 703.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. et al. (2013). Qualitative Research Practice: a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. SAGE.Google Scholar
Rivas, J. (2015). Editors interview with commissioner vestager. World Competition, 38(2), 183–187.Google Scholar
Van Rompuy, B. (2011). CPI antitrust chronicle the impact of the Lisbon treaty on EU competition law: a review of recent case law of the EU courts. Antitrust Chronicle, 12, 1–9.Google Scholar
Van Rompuy, B. (2012). Economic Efficiency: the Sole Concern of Modern Antitrust Policy?: Non-efficiency Considerations Under Article 101 TFEU. Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Ross, M. (2000). Article 16 EC and services of general interest: from derogation to obligation? European Law Review, 25(1), 22–38.Google Scholar
Rousseva, E. (2013). Reflections on the relevance and proof of efficiency defences in modern EU antitrust law. In Bourgeois, J. and Waelbroeck, D., eds., Ten Years of Effects-Based Approach in EU Competition Law. Bruylant, pp. 239–291.Google Scholar
Russe, W. A. and Griffiths., R. (1998). Paradise lost or paradise regained? Cartel policy and cartel legislation in the Netherlands. In Martin, S., ed., Competition Policies in Europe. Elsevier, pp. 15–39.Google Scholar
Sabbatini, P. (2008). Funding the Budget of a Competition Authority with the Fines it Imposes. Available at: http://acle.uva.nl/binaries/content/assets/subsites/amsterdam-center-for-law--economics/cr-meetings/2009/paper_sabbatini.pdf.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Graells, A. (2014). Monitor and the Competition and Markets Authority, University of Leicester School of Law Research paper No. 14-32. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2528569.Google Scholar
Sárai, J. (2016). New instrument introduced into the Hungarian competition act- the warning. OECD-GVH RCC Newsletter, 6, 27–28.Google Scholar
Sauter, W. (2010). The Role of Competition Rules in the Context of Healthcare Reform in the Netherlands. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1546445.Google Scholar
Sauter, W. (2014). Proportionality in EU competition law. European Competition Law Review, 35, 327–332.Google Scholar
Sauter, W. (2015). Containing corporatism: EU competition law and private interest government. European Competition Law Review, 36(5), 187–193.Google Scholar
Schepel, H. (2002). Delegation of regulatory powers to private parties under EC competition law: towards a procedural public interest test. Common Market Law Review, 39(2), 31–51.Google Scholar
Schiek, D. and Gideon, A. (2018). Outsmarting the gig-economy through collective bargaining – EU competition law as a barrier to smart cities. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 32(2–3), 275–294.Google Scholar
Schinkel, M. and Spiegel, Y. (2016). Can collusion promote sustainable consumption and production? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 53, 371–398.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. (2001). Non-competition factors in the European competition policy: the necessity of institutional reforms. CeGE Discussion Paper, No. 13.Google Scholar
Schwartz, L. B. (1979). Justice and other non-economic goals of antitrust. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127(4), 1076–1081.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, H. (2007). Competition law and public policy: reconsidering an uneasy relationship. The example of Article 81 Working Paper No. 30. European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, H. (2008). Commitment decisions under Article 9 of regulation 1/2003: the developing EC practice and case law. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1306245.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, H. (2011). Services of general economic interest: European law’s impact on the role of markets and of member states. In Cremona, M., ed., Market Integration and Public Services in the European Union. Oxford University Press, pp. 11–62.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, H. (2012). Commitment Decisions in the EU and in the Member States: Functions and Risks of a New Instrument of Competition Law Enforcement within a Federal Enforcement. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2101630.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, H. (2013). Judicial review in EU competition law. In Lianos, I. and Geradin, D., eds., Handbook on European Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 491–538.Google Scholar
Scott, A. (2012). The evolution of competition law and policy in the UK. In Mehta, P. S., ed., Evolution of Competition Laws and their Enforcement, A Political Economy Perspective. Routledge.Google Scholar
Seidel, K. and Federico Pace, L. (2013). The drafting and the role of regulation 17: a hard-fought compromise. In Klaus Patel, K. and Schweitzer, H., eds., The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law. Oxford University Press, pp. 54–88.Google Scholar
Semmelmann, C. (2008a). Social Policy Goals in the Interpretation of Article 81 EC. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.Google Scholar
Semmelmann, C. (2008b). The future role of the non-competition goals in the interpretation of Article 81 EC. Global Antitrust Review, 1(1), 15–47.Google Scholar
SER (2003). Report on the Review and Amendment of the Dutch Competition Act. Available at: https://www.ser.nl/en/~/media/files/internet/talen/engels/2003/2003_06.ashx.Google Scholar
de Silva, I. (2019). The future of competition law: time to change or time to adapt? Speech in the Fordham Universitys Annual Conference 12 September 2019.Google Scholar
Simonsson, I. (2010). Legitimacy in EU Cartel Control, Modern Studies in European Law. Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. (2017). Proposal for a directive to empower national competition authorities to be more effective enforcers (ECN+). Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 8(10), 625–633.Google Scholar
Snoep, M. (2020a). Competition enforcement in times of crisis – a perspective from the ACM. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 8(2), 267–269.Google Scholar
Snoep, M. (2020b). Sustainability goals and antitrust: finding the common ground. Speech in the Concurrences Webinar, of 14 September 2020. Available at: https://events.concurrences.com/en/sustainability.Google Scholar
Sosnick, S. H. (1958). A critique of concepts of workable competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 380–423.Google Scholar
Souam, S. (1998). French competition policy. In Griliches, Z. and Ringstad, V., eds., Contributions to Economic Analysis. North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Stefan, O. (2008). European competition soft law in European courts: a matter of hard principles? European Law Journal, 14(6), 753–772.Google Scholar
Steindorff, E. (1984). Article 85 and the rule of reason Common Market Law Review, 21(1), 639–646.Google Scholar
Stephan, A. (2013). Cartels. In Lianos, I. and Geradin, D., eds., Handbook on European Competition Law: substantive Aspects. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 217–240.Google Scholar
Stern, J. (2015). Sectoral regulation and competition policy: the UKs concurrency arrangements - an economic perspective. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 11(4), 881–915.Google Scholar
Steuer, R. M. (2017). The horizons of antitrust. St. Johns Law Review, 91(1), 177–210.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. (1956). On the concept of workable competition as an antitrust guide. Antitrust Bulletin, 2, 3–39.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Private Interest Government: beyond Market and State. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Stucke, M. E. (2012). Reconsidering antitrust’s goals. Boston College Law Review, 53(2), 551–629.Google Scholar
Stucke, M. E. (2015). Leniency, whistle-blowing and the individual: should we create another race to the competition agency? In Beaton-Wells, C. and Tran, C., eds., Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: leniency Religion. Bloomsbury Publishing, p. 209.Google Scholar
Sufrin, B. (2006). The evolution of Article 81(3) of the EC treaty. The Antitrust Bulletin, 51(4), 915–981.Google Scholar
Svetlicinii, A., Bernatt, M. and Botta, M. (2018). The dark matter in EU competition law: non-infringement decisions in the new EU member states before and after Tele2 Polska. European Law Review, 43(3), 422–443.Google Scholar
Szilágyi, (2013). Amendment to the act CXXVIII of 2012 on inter-branch organizations, english translation. In Szilágyi, , ed., Some Aspects of Liability in Hungarian Competition Law Enforcement. Available at: https://jak.ppke.hu/uploads/articles/12417/file/liability_2013_plain.pdf.Google Scholar
Szilagyi, P. (2012). Hungarian competition law & policy: the watermelon Omen. Antitrust Chronicle, 10.Google Scholar
Szyszczak, E. (2004). Public services in the new economy. In Graham, C. and Smith, F., eds., Competition, Regulation and the New Economy. Hart Publishing, pp. 185–206.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. (2016). Ordoliberalism and balancing competition goals in the development of the European Union. The Antitrust Bulletin, 6(2), 264–289.Google Scholar
Temple Lang, J. (1989). European community competition law and member state action. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 10(1), 114–132.Google Scholar
Temple Lang, J. (1994). European community constitutional law and the enforcement of community antitrust law. In Berry, H. and Venit, J. S., eds., Annual Proceedings. Fordham Corporate Law Institute. Transnational Juris Publications, pp. 525–604.Google Scholar
Temple Lang, J. (1998). FIDE Congress 1998: general Report on the Application of Community Competition Law on Enterprises by National Courts and National Authorities.Google Scholar
Temple Lang, J. (2006). Commitment decisions and settlements with antitrust authorities and private parties under European antitrust law. In Hawk, B. E., ed., Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute. Kluwer Law International, pp. 265–324.Google Scholar
Temple Lang, J. (2014). After Fifty Years – What I Needed for a Unified European Competition Policy? Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2519713.Google Scholar
The Attorney Generals National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws, U.S. G.P.O. (1955).Google Scholar
Toader, C. (2017). The national judge and preliminary rulings: recent CJEU case law on Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. In Almășan, A. and Whelan, P., eds., The Consistent Application of EU Competition Law. Springer, pp. 165–175.Google Scholar
Torre, F. (2010). The 2006 guidelines on fines: reflections on the commission’s practice. World Competition, 33(3), 359–416.Google Scholar
Tóth, T. (2004). EU enlargement and modernisation of competition law: some national experiences. In Geradin, D., ed., Modernisation and Enlargement: two Major Challenges for EC Competition Law. Intersentia nv.Google Scholar
Tóth, T. (2013). The Fall of Agricultural Cartel Enforcement in Hungary. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2515967.Google Scholar
Townley, C. (2004). The liner shipping block exemptions in European law - has the tide turned. World Competition, 27(1), 107–153.Google Scholar
Townley, C. (2010). The goals of chapter I of the UKs competition act 1998. Yearbook of European Law, 29(1), 307–360.Google Scholar
Townley, C. (2011). Which goals count in article 101 TFEU? Public policy and its discontents by Article 101 TFEU?, European Competition Law Review, 9, 441–448.Google Scholar
Townley, C. (2018). A Framework for European Competition Law: co-ordinated Diversity. Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Turner, D. F. (1990). The virtues and problems of antitrust law. Antitrust Bulletin, 35, 297–310.Google Scholar
Turner, J. D. C. (2010). Intellectual Property and EU Competition Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyree, A. L. (1981). Fact content analysis of case law: methods and limitations. Jurimetrics, 22(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
UAIPIT (2000). Act LVII on the Prohibition of Unfair and Restrictive Market Practices following the 2000 Amendment. English translation. Available in: http://www.uaipit.com/files/documentos/0000005992_Hungarian_Competition_Act_1996.pdf.Google Scholar
Van Bael, I. (1986). The antitrust settlement practice of the EEC commission. Common Market Law Review, 23, 61–90.Google Scholar
Van Bael, I. (1993). Insufficient judicial control of EC competition law enforcement. In Hawk, B. E., ed., Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute. Fordham Corporate Law Institute, pp. 733–744.Google Scholar
Vane, H. (2015). ‘Unprecedented’ collaboration leaves Germany isolated on price parity clauses. Global Competition Review.Google Scholar
Várady, T. (1999). The emergence of competition law in (former) socialist countries. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 47(2), 229–275.Google Scholar
Varju, M. and Papp, M. (2016). The crisis, national economic particularism and EU law: what can we learn from the Hungarian case? Common Market Law Review, 53(6), 1647–1674.Google Scholar
Vedder, H. (2009). Of jurisdiction and justification; why competition is good for ‘non-economic’ goals, but may need to be restricted. Competition Law Review, 6, 51–75.Google Scholar
Veljanovski, C. (2007). Cartel fines in Europe-law, practice and deterrence. World Competition, 30(1), 65–86.Google Scholar
Venit, J. S. (1985). The commissions opposition procedure-between the Scylla of ultra vires and the Charybdis of perfume: legal consequences and tactical considerations. Common Market Law Review, 22, 167–202.Google Scholar
Venit, J. S. (2003). Brave new world: the modernization and decentralization of enforcement under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC treaty. Common Market Law Review, 545–580.Google Scholar
Verstrynge, J.-F. (1989). The obligations of member states as regards competition in the EEC treaty. In Hawk, B. E., ed., Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute. Matthew Bender, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
Vestager, M. (2016). Setting priorities in antitrust, Speech in GCLC, Brussels, 1 February 2016. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/setting-priorities-antitrust_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Vickers, J. (2017). Consequences of Brexit for competition law and policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33, 70–78.Google Scholar
van der Vijver, T. (2012). Objective justification and Article 102 TFEU. World Competition, 35(1), 55–76.Google Scholar
Vogel, L. (2016). The recent application of EU and national competition law to distribution agreements: does competition law promote efficient distribution networks? Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 7(9), 628–640.Google Scholar
Vogelaar, F., Stuyck, J. and van Reeken, B. (2000). Competition Law in the EU, its Member States and Switzerland.-Vol. 1: EC, France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, The Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland. Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Waarden, F. van and Drahos, M. (2002). Courts and (epistemic) communities in the convergence of competition policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 913–934.Google Scholar
Waelbroeck, D. (1986). New forms of settlement of antitrust cases and procedural safeguards: is regulation 17 falling into abeyance? European Law Review, 11(4), 268–280.Google Scholar
Waelbroeck, D. and Davies, Z. (2018). Coty, clarifying competition law in the wake of Pierre Fabre. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9(7), 431–442.Google Scholar
Waelbroeck, M. (1988). Antitrust analysis under Articles 85 (1) and 85 (3). In Hawk, B., ed., North American and Common Market Antitrust and Trade Laws 1987, Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute. M. Bender, pp. 693–724.Google Scholar
Wagner-von Papp, F. (2012). Best and even better practices in commitment procedures after Alrosa: the dangers of abandoning the ‘struggle for competition law’. Common Market Law Review, 49(3), 929–970.Google Scholar
Wagner-von Papp, F. (2015). Preface: De Minimis. Bulletin e-Competitions De minimis, Article N° 72.Google Scholar
Wathelet, M. (2015). Commitment decisions and the paucity of precedent. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 6(8), 553–555.Google Scholar
Webley, L. (2010). Qualitative approaches to empirical legal research. In Cane, P. and Kritzer, H., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press, pp. 926–950.Google Scholar
Wendt, I. E. (2012). EU Competition Law and Liberal Professions: an Uneasy Relationship? Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Wesseling, R. (1999). The commission white paper on modernisation of EC antitrust law: unspoken consequences and incomplete treatment of alternative options. European Competition Law Review, 20(8), 420–433.Google Scholar
Wessman, P. (1991). Competition law in Hungary – Act LXXXVI of 1990 on the prohibition of unfair market practices. World Competition, 15(4), 17–25.Google Scholar
Whish, R. (2000). Regulation 2790/99: the commission’s `new style’ Block Exemption for Vertical Agreements. Common Market Law Review, 37(4), 887–924.Google Scholar
Whish, R. and Sufrin, B. (1987). Article 85 and the rule of reason. Yearbook of European Law, 7(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
Wijckmans, F. (2018). Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH: possibility in selective distribution system to Ban Sales via third-party platforms. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 9(6), 373–375.Google Scholar
Wijckmans, F. and Tuytschaever, F. (2011). Vertical Agreements in EU Competition Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. (1993). The metamorphosis of European competition policy. In Snyder, F. G., ed., European Community Law I. New York University Press, pp. 270–293.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. (2005). Agency escape: decentralization or dominance of the European commission in the modernization of competition policy? Governance, 18(3), 431–452.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. and Bartle, I. (2002). The unanticipated consequences of creating independent competition agencies. West European Politics, 25(1), 148–172.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2004a). Regulation 1/2003: a reminder of the main issues. In Geradin, D., ed., Modernisation and Enlargement: Two Major Challenges for EC Competition Law. Intersentia, pp. 9–83.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2004b). The combination of the investigative and prosecutorial funcion and the adjudicative function in EC antitrust enforcement: a legal and economic analysis. World Competition, 27(2), 201–224.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2005). Principles of European Antitrust Enforcement. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2006a). Optimal antitrust fines: theory and practice. World Competition, 29(2), 183–208.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2006b). Settlements of EU antitrust investigations: commitment decisions under Article 9 of regulation No. 1/2003. World Competition, 29(3), 345–366.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2007). Leniency in antitrust enforcement: theory and practice. Conferences on New Political Economy, 24(1), 203–248.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2009). The relationship between public antitrust enforcement and private actions for damages. World Competition, 32(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2011). Discretion and prioritisation in public antitrust enforcement, in particular EU antitrust enforcement. World Competition, 34(3), 353–382.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2013). Ten years of regulation 1/2003 – a retrospective. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 4(4), 293–301.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2016). The use of leniency in EU cartel enforcement: an assessment after twenty years. World Competition, 39(3), 327–388.Google Scholar
Wils, W. P. J. (2017). Competition authorities: towards more independence and prioritisation? Romanian Review of European Law, 2017(2), 56–92.Google Scholar
WIPO (1990). Law No. LXXXVI of 1990 on the Prohibition of Unfair Market Practice. English translation. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=2195.Google Scholar
WIPO (2006a). Act LVII on the Prohibition of Unfair and Restrictive Market Practices following the 2005 Amendment, English translation. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/hu/hu085en.pdf.Google Scholar
WIPO (2006b). Commercial Code, English translation. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=180801.Google Scholar
Witt, A. C. (2012). Public policy goals under EU competition law—now is the time to set the house in order. European Competition Journal, 8(3), 443–471.Google Scholar
Witt, A. C. (2016a). Restrictions on the use of third-party platforms in selective distribution agreements for luxury goods. European Competition Journal, 12(2–3), 435–461.Google Scholar
Witt, A. C. (2018). The enforcement of Article 101 TFEU–what has happened to the effects analysis? Common Market Law Review, 55(2), 417–448.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. (1962). Cartel and monopoly legislation; Its application in the European economic community. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1, 539–559.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. (1963). The role of the court of the European communities in the antitrust structure of the common market. Fordham Law Review, 31(4), 621–638.Google Scholar
Wright, K. (2008). European commission opinions to national courts in antitrust cases: consistent application and the judicial-administrative relationship. PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Wu, T. (2018). After consumer welfare, now what? The “protection of competition. Competition Policy International; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-608, available https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3249173.Google Scholar
van der Zee, E. (2020). Quantifying benefits of sustainability agreements under Article 101 TFEU. World Competition, 43(2), 189–208.Google Scholar
Ziegler, D. T. and Horváthy, B. (2017). Europeanization of the Hungarian legal order: from convergence to cancellation? In Hashimoto, T. and Rhimes, M., eds., Reviewing European Union Accession: unexpected Results, Spillover Effects, and Externalities. Brill.Google Scholar
Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H. (1992). Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar