Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:51:20.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - NOC NOC, Who’s There? A New Ontological Category (NOC) for Social Robots

from Part I - Cognitive Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

By
Peter H. Kahn,  and
Solace Shen
Edited by
Nancy Budwig ,
Elliot Turiel  and
Philip David Zelazo
Nancy Budwig
Affiliation:
Clark University, Massachusetts
Elliot Turiel
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Philip David Zelazo
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
New Perspectives on Human Development , pp. 106 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychology study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Socially intelligent agents in human primate culture. In Trappl, R. & Payr, S. (Eds.), Agent culture: Human–agent interaction in a multicultural world (pp. 45–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2008). The dominant animal: human evolution and the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H. Jr. (2008). Human values, ethics, and design. In Jacko, J. A. & Sears, A. (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (pp. 1241–1266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Revised and updated chapter from the 2003 edition.)Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Borning, A. (2006). Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In Zhang, P. & Galletta, D. (eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations (pp. 348–372). Armonk, New York; London, England: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Hagman, J. (2003). Hardware companions?: What online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 273–280). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, R. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A., Huttenrauch, H., & Eklundh, K. S. (2004). Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN ’04) (pp. 575–580). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Google Scholar
Helwig, C. C. (1995). Adolescents’ and young adults’ conceptions of civil liberties: Freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 66, 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children’s naïve thinking about the biological world. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Jipson, J. L., & Gelman, S. A. (2007). Robots and rodents: Children’s inferences about living and nonliving kinds. Child Development, 78(6), 1675–1688. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, P. H. Jr. (1992). Children’s obligatory and discretionary moral judgments. Child Development, 63(2), 416–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, P. H. Jr. (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jr.Kahn, P. H., Freier, N., G., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ruckert, J. H., Severson, R. L., & Kane, S. K. (2008). Design patterns for sociality in human robot interaction. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2008 (pp. 271–278). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Jr.Kahn, P. H., Friedman, B., Perez-Granados, D. R., & Freier, N. G. (2006). Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7, 405–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Gary, H. E., & Shen, S. (2013). Children’s social relationship with current and near-future robots. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 32–37. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Gill, B. T., Reichert, A. L., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Ruckert, J. H. (2010). Validating interaction patterns in HRI. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp.183–184). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48, 303–314. doi: 10.1037/a0027033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Ruckert, J. H., Shen, S., … Severson, R. L. (2012). Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 33–40. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Shen, S., Gary, H. E., & Ruckert, J. H. (2015). Will people keep the secret of a humanoid robot? – Psychological intimacy in HRI. Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, (pp. 173–180). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Reichert, A. L., Gary, H. E., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Shen, S., … & Gill, B. T. (2011). The new ontological category hypothesis in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 159–160. doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Ruckert, J. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Reichert, A., Gary, H., and Shen, S. (2010). Psychological intimacy with robots?: Using interaction patterns to uncover depth of relation. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 123–124). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., Severson, R. L., & Ruckert, J. H. (2009). The human relation with nature and technological nature. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Turiel, E. (1988). Children’s conceptions of trust in the context of social expectations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 403–419.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
Levy, D. N. (2007). Love + sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relations. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
MacDorman, K. F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3), 297–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R. T., Billard, A. (2004). Robots as assistive technology – Does appearance matter? In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN ’04) (pp. 277–282). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, K. J. (Ed.). (2010). Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severson, R. L., & Carlson, S. M. (2010). Behaving as or behaving as if? Children’s conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category. Neural Networks, 23(8), 1099–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., & Scassellati, B. (2010). No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 219–226). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., & Braeges, J. (1990). The development of toddlers’ moral and conventional judgments. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 329–346.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Schlagman, N., & Adams, P. W. (1993). Preschool children’s judgments about hypothetical and actual transgressions. Child Development, 64, 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (1998). Moral development. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. (5th ed.). Vol. 3: Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 863–932). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wainryb, C. (1995). Reasoning about social conflicts in different cultures: Druze and Jewish children in Israel. Child Development, 66, 390–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×