Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Editors' Introduction: The Question of Modernity Meets the Question of Leo Strauss
- Why Leo Strauss? Four Answers and One Consideration concerning the Uses and Disadvantages of the School for the Philosophical Life
- Leo Strauss and the Contemporary Return to Political Philosophy
- Philosophy as the Right Way of Life in Natural Right and History
- The Philosopher's Ancient Clothes: Leo Strauss on Philosophy and Poetry
- Leo Strauss as Erzieher: The Defense of the Philosophical Life or the Defense of Life Against Philosophy?
- Modern Challenges – Platonic Responses: Strauss, Arendt, Voegelin
- Karl Löwith and Leo Strauss on Modernity, Secularization, and Nihilism
- Remarks on the Strauss-Kojève Dialogue and its Presuppositions
- Carl Schmitt and his Critic
- Postmodernism and the Art of Writing: The Importance of Leo Strauss for the 21st Century
- Leo Strauss's Gynaikologia
- Contributors
- Name Index
- Subject Index
Philosophy as the Right Way of Life in Natural Right and History
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Editors' Introduction: The Question of Modernity Meets the Question of Leo Strauss
- Why Leo Strauss? Four Answers and One Consideration concerning the Uses and Disadvantages of the School for the Philosophical Life
- Leo Strauss and the Contemporary Return to Political Philosophy
- Philosophy as the Right Way of Life in Natural Right and History
- The Philosopher's Ancient Clothes: Leo Strauss on Philosophy and Poetry
- Leo Strauss as Erzieher: The Defense of the Philosophical Life or the Defense of Life Against Philosophy?
- Modern Challenges – Platonic Responses: Strauss, Arendt, Voegelin
- Karl Löwith and Leo Strauss on Modernity, Secularization, and Nihilism
- Remarks on the Strauss-Kojève Dialogue and its Presuppositions
- Carl Schmitt and his Critic
- Postmodernism and the Art of Writing: The Importance of Leo Strauss for the 21st Century
- Leo Strauss's Gynaikologia
- Contributors
- Name Index
- Subject Index
Summary
One theme in Leo Strauss's work is so salient that it seems almost too obvious to remark, yet its salience in his thought stands in sharp contrast with its near disappearance from so much of modern philosophy. That theme is the conception of philosophy as a way of life, and the related claims that the character of this way of life and its choice or justification as the right way of life are themselves major themes of philosophy, even the major themes of Socratic philosophy or, as Strauss would have it, classical political philosophy. This conception contrasts with the conventional contemporary academic conception of philosophy as a discipline (a discipline in the sense of a branch of research with its own methods and subject matters, rather than as askesis or formation of character).
In Natural Right and History Strauss introduces “the idea of philosophy” in his discussion of conventionalism, a particular form of classical philosophy, early in the first chapter, “Natural Right and the Historical Approach.” Following Plato's famous metaphor in Book VII of the Republic, Strauss writes that philosophizing means “to ascend from the cave to the light of the sun, that is to the truth,” from “the world of opinion” to knowledge (11–12). This distinction between the worlds of opinion and knowledge is not only epistemological but social or political: the cave or world of opinion from which philosophy ascends is not private or individual opinion but public opinion, the authoritative opinion stabilized by the social fiat of a particular political community without which its members cannot live together. “Philosophizing means, then, to ascend from public dogma to essentially private knowledge.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Modernity and What Has Been LostConsiderations on the Legacy of Leo Strauss, pp. 43 - 52Publisher: Jagiellonian University PressPrint publication year: 2010