Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:59:00.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part 3 - Culture and Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Edited by
Michael Bender  and
Byron G. Adams
Michael Bender
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Byron G. Adams
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Methods and Assessment in Culture and Psychology , pp. 253 - 340
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Chatfield, C. (2016). The analysis of time series: An introduction. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2013). Social psychology of culture. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner and Sons.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150.Google Scholar
Dow, M. M. (2007). Galton’s problem as multiple network autocorrelation effects: Cultural trait transmission and ecological constraint. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 336–363.Google Scholar
Dow, M. M., & Eff, E. A. (2008). Global, regional, and local network autocorrelation in the standard cross-cultural sample. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 148–171.Google Scholar
Eshel, G. (2011). Spatiotemporal data analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., & Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104.Google Scholar
Gilbert, G. M. (1951). Stereotype persistence and change among college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 245–254.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (2013). The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science, 24, 1722–1731. 7Google Scholar
Grossmann, I., & Varnum, M. E. (2015). Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America. Psychological Science, 26, 311–324Google Scholar
Hamamura, T. (2012). Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 3–24.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilisations. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., Wang, W., & Huang, Q. (2015). Time series analysis for psychological research: examining and forecasting change. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 727.Google Scholar
Karlins, M., Coffman, T. L., & Walters, G. (1969). On the fading of social stereotypes: Studies in three generations of college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 1–16.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2005). Is culture a problem for social psychology? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 19–38.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2008). A social psychology of cultural dynamics: Examining how cultures are formed, maintained, and transformed. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2014). How can you capture cultural dynamics? Frontiers in Psychology, 5(995), 1–16.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2016a). Cultural dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 93–97.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2016b). Culture and psychology in the 21st century: Conceptions of culture and person revised. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 4–20.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2018). What is culture for? In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y., Bain, P., & Perfors, A. (2019). The psychology of cultural dynamics: What is it, what is known, and what is yet to be known? Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 499–529.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). History of culture and psychology. In Kruglanski, A. & Stroebe, W. (eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y., & Kashima, E. S. (2003). Individualism, GNP, climate, and pronoun drop: Is individualism determined by affluence and climate, or does language use play a role? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 125–134.Google Scholar
Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koplenig, A., & Müller-Spitzer, C. (2016). Population size predicts lexical diversity, but so does the mean sea level: Why it is important to correctly account for the structure of temporal data. PLoS ONE, 11, 1–14.Google Scholar
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model of social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 36, pp. 118–197). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2010). Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Team, T. G. B., & Aiden, E. L. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331, 176–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659.Google Scholar
Naroll, R. (1961). Two solutions to Galton’s problem. Philosophy of Science, 28, 15–39.Google Scholar
Park, H., Twenge, J. M., & Greenfield, P. M. (2014). The Great Recession: Implications for adolescent values and behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 310–318.Google Scholar
Roberts, S., & Winters, J. (2013). Linguistic diversity and traffic accidents: Lessons from statistical studies of cultural traits. PLoS ONE, 8, 1–13.Google Scholar
Santos, H. C., Varnum, M. E., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28, 1228–1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Studying values: Personal adventure, future directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 307–319.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Age and birth cohort differences in self-esteem: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 321–344.Google Scholar
Uz, I. (2015). The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 319–335.Google Scholar
Valente, T. W. (2010). Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications (vol. 1), Oxford: Oxford University Press New York.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research (vol. 1), Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2015). Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Werner, O., & Campbell, D. T. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 398–420). American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar

References

Adams, B. G., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2015). The many faces of expatriate identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 49, 322–331.Google Scholar
Alter, A. L., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2009). Cultural sharing in a global village: Evidence for extracultural cognition in European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 742–760.Google Scholar
Aydinli, A., & Bender, M. (2015). Cultural priming as a tool to understand multiculturalism and culture. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).Google Scholar
Bender, M., & Ng, S. H. (2009). Dynamic biculturalism: Socially connected and individuated unique selves in a globalized world. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 199–210.Google Scholar
Benet-Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural identity integration (BII): components and psychosocial antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73, 1015–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benet-Martinez, V., & Hong, Y-y. (2014). The Oxford handbook of multicultural identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benet-Martinez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 492–516.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5–34.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (2008). Globalisation and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 328–336.Google Scholar
Bohner, G., Siebler, F., Gonzalez, R., Haye, A., & Schmidt, E. A. (2008). Situational flexibility of in-group-related attitudes: A single category IAT study of people with dual national identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 301–317.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who Is this “we”? Levels of collective Identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93.Google Scholar
Briley, D. A., Morris, M. W., & Simonson, I. (2000). Reasons as carriers of culture: Dynamic versus dispositional models of cultural influence on decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 157–178.Google Scholar
Buchtel, E. (2014). Cultural sensitivity or cultural stereotyping? Positive and negative effects of a cultural psychology class. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39, 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005–1018.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Leung, A. K., Yang, D. Y. J., Chiu, C-y., Li, Z., & Cheng, S. Y. Y. (2016). Cultural threats in culturally mixed encounters hamper creative performance for individuals with lower openness to experience. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1321–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheon, B. K., Christopoulos, G., & Hong, Y-y. (2016). Disgust associated with culture mixing: Why and who? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(10), 1268–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiao, C. Y., Harada, T., Komeda, H., Li, Z., Mano, Y., Saito, D., Parrish, T. B., Sadato, N., & Iidaka, T. (2010). Dynamic cultural influences on neural representations of the self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1–11.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., & Cheng, S. Y-y. (2007). Toward a social psychology of culture and globalization: Some social cognitive consequences of activating two cultures simultaneously. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 84–100.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., Chia, S. I., & Wan, W. (2015). Cross-cultural measures of values, personality and beliefs. In Boyle, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 756–772). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., Gelfand, M., Yamagishi, T., Shteynberg, G., & Wan, C. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 482–493.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., Gries, P., Torelli, C. J., & Cheng, S. Y-Y. (2011). Toward a social psychology of globalization. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 663–676.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., & Hong, Y. (2005). Cultural competence: Dynamic processes. In Elliot, A. & Dweck, C. S. (eds.), Handbook of motivation and competence (pp. 489–505). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., & Hong, Y. (2006). Social psychology of culture. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., & Kwan, L. Y-y. (2016). Globalization and psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 44–48.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., Mallorie, L., Keh, H-T., & Law, W. (2009). Perceptions of culture in multicultural space: Joint presentation of images from two cultures increases ingroup attribution of culture-typical characteristics. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 282–300.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., Morris, M., Hong, Y., & Menon, T. (2000). Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78, 247–259.Google Scholar
Chiu, C-y., Ng, S. S-L., & Au, E. (2013). Culture and social cognition. In Carlston, D. (ed.), Oxford handbook of social cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, J.,. Morris, M. W., Slepian, M. L., & Tadmor, C. T. (2017). Choosing fusion: The effects of diversity ideologies on preference for culturally mixed experiences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 163–171.Google Scholar
Cui, N., Xu, L., Wang, T., Qualis, W., & Hu, Y. (2016). How does framing strategy affect evaluation of culturally mixed products? The self-other asymmetry effect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2016, 47, 1307–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55–75.Google Scholar
De keersmaecker, J., Assche, V. J., & Roets, A. (2016). Need for closure effects on affective and cognitive responses to culture fusion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1294–1306.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. M., Iturbide, M. I., & Gordon, B. P. (2014). Tridimensional (3D) acculturation: Ethnic identity and psychological functioning of tricultural Jamaican immigrants. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 3, 238–251.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. (2011). Cross-cultural training effects on cultural essentialism beliefs and cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 767–775.Google Scholar
Fishbach, A., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Together or apart: When goals and temptations complement versus compete. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 547–559.Google Scholar
Fiske, A., Kitayama, S., Markus, H., & Nisbett, R. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 915–981). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fu, H-y., Chiu, C-y., Morris, M. W., Young, M. (2007). Spontaneous inferences from cultural cues: Varying responses of cultural insiders and outsiders. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 58–75.Google Scholar
Fu, J. H.-Y., Zhang, Z.-X., Li, F., & Leung, Y. K. (2016). Opening the mind: Effect of culture mixing on acceptance of organizational change. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(10), 1361–1372.Google Scholar
Galloway, S. (2012). How Hollywood conquered the world (all over again). Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/02/24/how-hollywood-conquered-the-world-all-over-again/ on March 16, 2020.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guan, M., Lee, F., & Cole, E. R. (2012). Complexity of culture: the role of identity and context in bicultural individuals’ body ideals. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18, 247–57.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713Google Scholar
Hao, J., Li, D., Peng, L., Peng, S., & Torelli, C. J. (2016). Advancing our understanding of culture mixing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1257–1267.Google Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2, 1–19.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Science, 33, 61–83.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. E. (eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hong, Y., Benet-Martinez, V., Chiu, C-y., & Morris, M. W. (2003). Boundaries of cultural influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 453–464.Google Scholar
Hong, Y., & Chiu, C-y. (2001). Toward a paradigm shift: From cultural differences in social cognition to social cognitive mediation of cultural differences. Social Cognition, 19, 118–196.Google Scholar
Hong, Y., Chiu, C-y., & Kung, M. (1997). Bringing culture out in front: Effects of cultural meaning system activation on social cognition. In Leung, K., Kashima, Y., Kim, U., & Yamaguchi, S. (eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology (vol. 1, pp. 139–150). Singapore: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hong, Y., Ip, G., & Chiu, C-y., Morris, M. W., & Menon, T. (2001). Cultural identity and the dynamic construction of the self: Collective duties and individual rights in Chinese and American cultures. Social Cognition, 19, 251–268.Google Scholar
Hong, Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C-y., & Benet, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720.Google Scholar
Hsee, C. (2000). Attribute evaluability and its implications for joint-separate evaluation reversals and beyond. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (eds.), Choices, values and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.Google Scholar
Keh, H. T., Torelli, C. J., Chiu, C-y., & Hao, J. (2016). Integrative responses to culture mixing in brand name translations: The roles of product self-expressiveness and self-relevance of values among bicultural Chinese consumers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1345–1360.Google Scholar
Kesebir, P. (2011). Existential functions of culture: The monumental immortality project. In Leung, A., Chiu, C.-Y., and Hong, Y.-Y. (eds.), Cultural processes: A social psychological perspective (pp. 96–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kwan, L. Y.-Y., & Li, D. (2016). The Exception effect: How shopping experiences with local status brands shapes reactions to culture-mixed products. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1373–1379.Google Scholar
Kwan, L.Y-y., Yap, S., & Chiu, C-y. (2015). Mere exposure affects perceived descriptive norms: Implications for personal preferences and trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 48–58.Google Scholar
Leung, A. K-y., & Chiu, C-y. (2008). Interactive effects of multicultural experiences and openness to experience on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 376–382.Google Scholar
Leung, A. K-y., & Chiu, C-y. (2010). Multicultural experiences, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 723–741.Google Scholar
Leung, A. K-y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C-y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how? American Psychologist, 63, 169–181.Google Scholar
Leung, K., & Van De Vijver, F. (1996). Cross-cultural research methodology. In Leong, F. T. L. & Austin, J. T. (eds.), The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants (pp. 351–358).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Li, D., Kreuzbauer, R., Chiu, C., & Keh, H. T. (2020). Culturally polite communication: enhancing the effectiveness of the localization strategy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51, 49–69.Google Scholar
Maddux, W. W., Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). When in Rome … Learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 731–741.Google Scholar
Maddux, W. W., and Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1047–1061.Google Scholar
Martin, L., & Shao, B. (2016). Early immersive culture mixing: The key to understanding cognitive and identity differences among multiculturals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1409–1429.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 25, 179–210.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and the physical environment: Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science, 17, 113–119.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., Chiu, C-y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., Hong, Y-y., Chiu, C-y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1–13.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., Mok, A., & Mor, S. (2011). Cultural identity threat: The role of cultural identifications in moderating closure responses to foreign cultural inflow. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 760–773.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949–971.Google Scholar
O’Connell, L. (2019). Trends in global export volume of trade in goods from 1950 to 2018. Retrieved from www.statista.com/statistics/264682/worldwide-export-volume-in-the-trade-since-1950/ on March 16, 2020.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311–342.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., Sorensen, N., Reber, R., & Chen, S. X. (2009). Connecting and separating mind-Sets: Culture as situated cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 217–235.Google Scholar
Peng, L., & Xie, T. (2016). Making similarity versus difference comparison affects perceptions after bicultural exposure and consumer reactions to culturally mixed products. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1380–1394.Google Scholar
Peng, L. Zheng, X., & Peng, S. (2017). The status quo of culture mixing research and its future directions. Advances in Psychological Science, 25, 1240–1250.Google Scholar
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Robertson, R. (1995). Globalization: Time–space and homogeneity–heterogeneity. In Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runkel, P. J., & McGrath, J. E. (1972). Research on human behavior: A systematic guide to method. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., & Szapocznik, J. (2010). Rethinking the concept of acculturation. American Psychologist, 65, 237–251.Google Scholar
Shaxson, N. (2019). Over a third of world trade happens inside multinational corporations. Retrieved from www.taxjustice.net/2019/04/09/over-a-third-or-more-of-world-trade-happens-inside-multinational-corporations/ on March 16, 2020.Google Scholar
Shi, Y., Shi, J., Luo, Y. L. L., & Cai, H. (2016). Understanding exclusionary reactions toward a foreign culture: The influence of intrusive cultural mixing on implicit intergroup bias. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1335–1344.Google Scholar
Smeekes, A., McKeown, S., & Psaltis, C. (2017). Endorsing narratives under threat: Maintaining perceived collective continuity through the protective power of ingroup narratives in Northern Ireland and Cyprus. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 282–300.Google Scholar
Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Chiu, C-y. (2007). Bicultural mind, self-construal, and recognition memory: Cultural priming effects on self- and mother-reference effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 818–824.Google Scholar
Thomson, R., Yuki, M., Talhelm, T., Schug, J., Kitos, M. Ayanian, A., Becker, J., Beckers, M., Chiu, C-y. et al. (2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 115, 7521–7526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting-Toomey, Stella. (2015). Identity negotiation theory. In Bennett, J. M. (ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of intercultural competence (pp. 418–422). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Torelli, C. J., Chiu, C-y., Tam, K-P., Au, A. K. C., & Keh, H. T. (2011). Exclusionary reactions to foreign cultures: Effects of simultaneous exposure to cultures in globalized space. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 716–742.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1961). Foresight and understanding. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 587–605.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Chasiotis, A. (2010). Making methods meet: Mixed design in cross-cultural research. In Harkness, J. A., Braun, M., Edwards, B., Johnson, T. P., Lyberg, L., Mohler, P. P., Pennell, B.-E., & Smith, T. W. (eds.), Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts. (pp. 455–473). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119–135.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, M., & Pouliasi, K. (2002). Biculturalism among older children: Cultural frame switching, attributions, self-identification, and attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 596–609.Google Scholar
Wan, C., Chiu, C-y., Tam, K-p., Lee, S-l., Lau, I. Y-m., & Peng, S-q. (2007). Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 337–354.Google Scholar
Wong, R. Y., & Hong, Y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Science, 16, 429–434.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Retrieved from www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 on March 16, 2020.Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Yang, Y., & Chiu, C-y. (2014). Responses to religious norm defection: The case of Hui Chinese Muslims not following the halal diet. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39, 1–8.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., & Schug, J. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 18, 579–584.Google Scholar
Yang, D. Y. J., Chen, X., Xu, J., Preston, J. L., & Chiu, C-y. (2016). Cultural symbolism and spatial separation: Some ways to deactivate exclusionary responses to culture mixing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1286–1293.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S., & Bond, M. H. (1980). Ethnic affirmation by Chinese bilinguals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11, 411–425.Google Scholar
Zou, X., Tam, K-p., Morris, M. W., Lee, S-l., Lau, Y-m., & Chiu, C-y. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus vs. personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579–597.Google Scholar

References

Allik, J., & Ralo, A. (2019). Culture and personality. In Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 397–438.Google Scholar
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 495–508.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1882.Google Scholar
Boer, D., Hanke, K., & He, J. (2018). On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 49, 713–734.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H. (1988). Social psychology across cultures: Two ways forward. In Adair, J. G., Belanger, D., & Dion, K. L. (eds.), Advances in Psychological Science: Social, Personal, and Cultural Aspects (vol. 1, pp. 137–150). Sussex: Psychology Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H. (2019). Traveling from the past into the future of cross-cultural psychology: A personal-scientific journey. In Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au, A., Tong, K. K., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., Murakami, F., & Lewis, J. R. (2004). Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 548–570.Google Scholar
Bowden, S. C., Saklofske, D. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Sudarshan, N. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (2016). Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire across 33 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 53–60.Google Scholar
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (1989). Multigroup comparisons and the assumption of equivalent construct validity across groups: Methodological and substantive issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 503–523.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (1991). The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Validating factorial structure and invariance across intermediate, secondary, and university educators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 583–605.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2016a). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2016b). Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: Issues, guidelines, and caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 5, 51–65.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T.L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 557–576.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1987). Adolescent self-concept: Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 365–385.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Factorial structure of the Family Values Scale from a multilevel-multicultural perspective. International Journal of Testing, 14, 168–192.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application. Psicothema, 29, 539–551.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1961). The mutual methodological relevance of anthropology and psychology. In Hsu, F. L. (ed.), Psychological Anthropology (pp. 333–352). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Cheung, M. W-L., Leung, K., & Au, K. (2006). Evaluating multilevel models in cross cultural research: An illustration with social axioms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 522–541.Google Scholar
Chow, S-M. (2017). Bayesian estimation and modeling: Editorial to the second special issue on Bayesian data analysis. Psychological Methods, 22, 609–615.Google Scholar
Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2019). Alignment optimization: Estimation of the most trustworthy means in cross-cultural studies even in the presence of noninvariance. In Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Billiet, J., & Meuleman, B. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A. (1987). Mutual relevance of mainstream and cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 55, 461–470.Google Scholar
Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought: A psychological introduction. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cooperrider, K., Marghetis, T., & Núñez, R. (2017). Where does the ordered line come from? Evidence from a culture of papua new guinea. Psychological Science, 28, 599–608.Google Scholar
Davidov, E. (2008). A cross-country and cross-time comparison of human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 2, 33–46.Google Scholar
Davidov, E., Cieciuch, J., Mueleman, B., Schmidt, P., Algesheimer, R., & Hausherr, M. (2015). The comparability of measurements of attitudes towards immigration in the European Social Survey: Exact versus approximate measurement equivalence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 244–266.Google Scholar
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55–75.Google Scholar
De Bondt, N., & van Petegem, P. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two applying Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling (BSEM) and multiple-group BSEM-based alignment with approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1963–1980.Google Scholar
Drasgow, F., & Kanfer, R. (1985). Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 662–680.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1972). Universal and cultural differences in facial expression of emotion. In Cole, J. R. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1971 (vol. 19, pp. 207–283). Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar
Ellefson, M. R., Ng, F. F.-Y., Wang, Q., & Hughes, C. (2017). Efficiency of executive function: A two-generation cross-cultural comparison of samples from Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Psychological Science, 28(5), 555–566.Google Scholar
Fang, X., Sauter, D. A., & Kleef, G. A. V. (2017). Seeing mixed emotions: The specificity of emotion perception from static and dynamic facial expressions across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 130–148.Google Scholar
Fischer, R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2018). Addressing methodological challenges in culture-comparative research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 691–712Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hoijtink, H., & Chow, S-M. (2017). Bayesian hypothesis testing: Editorial to the special issue on Bayesian data analysis. Psychological Methods, 22, 211–216.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.Google Scholar
International Test Commission (2017). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). Retrieved from www.InTestCom.org.Google Scholar
Ion, A., Iliescu, D., Aldhafri, S., Rana, N., Ratanadilok, K., Widyanti, A., & Nedelcea, C. (2017). A cross-cultural analysis of personality structure through the lens of the HEXACO model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 25–34.Google Scholar
Ispas, D., Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., & Johnson, R.E. (2014). Exploring the cross-cultural generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of Personality: The Romanian NEO PI-R. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1074–1088.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.Google Scholar
Kashima, Y. (2001). Culture and social cognition: Toward a social psychology of cultural dynamics. In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 325–260). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Wang, Y., & Nguyen, D.T. (2017). Measurement invariance testing with many groups: A comparison of five approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 524–544.Google Scholar
Leung, K., Bond, M. H., de Carrasquel, S. R., Muñoz, C., Hernández, M., Murakami, F.,… Singelis, T. M. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. P., Hugenberg, K., McConnell, A. R., Kunstman, J. W., & Deska, J. C. (2017). Black and White lies: Race-based biases in deception judgments. Psychological Science, 28, 1125–1136.Google Scholar
Lonner, W., Keith, K., & Matsumoto, D. (2019). Culture and the psychology curriculum: Foundations and resources. In Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lun, V. M.-C., & Bond, M. H. (2016). Achieving subjective well-being around the world: The moderating influence of gender, age and national goals for socializing children. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 587–608.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., Abdelfattah, F., & Nagengast, B. (2014). The big fish-little-pond effect in mathematics: A cross-cultural comparison of U.S. and Saudi Arabian TIMSS responses. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 777–804.Google Scholar
Marsh, H.W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (2006). Are cultural differences in emotion regulation mediated by personality traits? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 421–437.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Grissom, R., & Dinnel, D. (2001). Do between-culture differences really mean that people are different? A look at some measures of cultural effect size. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 478–490.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.) (2019). Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2016). Culture and Psychology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Nezlek, J. B., & Koopmann, B. (2007). Evidence for universality in phenomenological emotion response system coherence. Emotion, 7, 57–67.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 234–250.Google Scholar
Mishra, R. C. (2001). Cognition across cultures. In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 119–136). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, I., Barber, C., & Torney-Purta, J. (2017). Measurement invariance in comparing attitudes towards immigrants among youth across Europe in 1999 and 2009: The alignment method applied to IEA, CIVED, and ICCS. Survey Methods Research, 47, 687–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munet-Vilaró, F., Gregorich, S. E., & Folkman, S. (2002). Factor structure of the Spanish version of the ways of coping questionnaire. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1938–1954.Google Scholar
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335.Google Scholar
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2014). IRT studies of many groups: The alignment method. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 978–985.Google Scholar
Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Yarnell, L. M., Arimitsu, K., Castilho, P., Ghorbani, N., & Mantzios, M. (2019). Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion scale in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores. Psychological Assessment, 31, 27–45.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737–756.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Joe, R. C., & van de Koppel, J. M. H. (1987). Peeling the onion called culture: A synopsis. In Kagitcibasi, C. (ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 22–34). Berwyn, PA: Swets North America.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM 5. Chicago: Scientific software.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. H. R. (1905). Observations on the senses of the Todas. British Journal of Psychology, 1, 321–396.Google Scholar
Robert, C., Lee, W. C., & Chan, K. Y. (2006). An empirical analysis of measurement equivalence with the INDCOL measure of individualism and collectivism: Implications for valid cross-cultural inference. Personnel Psychology, 59, 65–99.Google Scholar
Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 31–57.Google Scholar
Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2017). Multidimensional invariance in international surveys: Categorical indicators and fit measure performance. Applied Measurement in Psychology, 30, 39–51.Google Scholar
Santos, H. C., Varnum, M. E. W., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28, 1228–1239.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In Kim, U. E. and Triandis, H. C. et al. (eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (vol. 18, pp. 85–119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.Google Scholar
Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, J. (1963). Cultural differences in the perception of geometric illusions. Science, 193, 769–771.Google Scholar
Singelis, T. M., Bond, M., Sharkey, W. F., & Lai, C. S. Y. (1999). Unpackaging culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 315–341.Google Scholar
Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239.Google Scholar
Svetina, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2017). Multidimensional measurement invariance in an international context: Fit measure performance with many groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 991–1008.Google Scholar
Tanaka-Matsumi, J. (2019). Abnormal psychology and culture. In Matsumoto, D. & Hwang, H. C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 431–467). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thalmayer, A. G., & Saucier, G. (2014). The Questionnaire Big Six in 26 nations: Developing cross-culturally applicable Big Six, Big Five, and Big Two inventories. European Journal of Personality, 28, 482–496.Google Scholar
Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649–655.Google Scholar
Van de Schoot, R., Kluytmans, A., Tummers, L., Lugtig, P., Hox, J., & Muthén, B. (2013). Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: A comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 700–714.Google Scholar
Van de Schoot, R., Sijbrandij, M., Depaoli, S., Winter, S. D., Olff, M., & van Loey, N. E. (2018). Bayesian PTSD-trajectory analysis with informed priors based on a systematic literature search and expert elicitation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 267–291.Google Scholar
Van de Schoot, R., Winter, S.D., Ryan, O., & Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. (2017). A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22, 217–239.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2001). Evolution of research methods. In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 77–97). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2004). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 141–156.Google Scholar
Van Erp, S., Mulder, J., & Oberski, D. L. (2017). Prior sensitivity analysis in default Bayesian structural equation modeling, Psychological Methods, 23, 363–388.Google Scholar
Whiting, B. B., & Whiting, J. W. (1975). Children of Six Cultures: A Psycho-Cultural Analysis. Oxford: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Woehr, D. J., Arciniega, L. M., & Lim, D. H. (2007). Examining work ethic across populations: A comparison of the Multidimensional Work Ethic Profile across three diverse cultures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 154–168.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provisioin of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 110–116.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T. (1988a). Exit from the group as an individualistic solution to the free rider problem in the United States and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 530–542.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T. (1988b). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 265–271.Google Scholar
Yoo, J., Miyamoto, Y., Rigotti, A., & Ryff, C. D. (2017). Linking positive affect to blood lipids: A cultural perspective. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1468–1477.Google Scholar
Zercher, F., Schmidt, P., Cieciuch, J., & Davidov, E. (2015). The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European Social Survey: Exact versus approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers of Psychology, 6, 733–748.Google Scholar

References

Bagozzi, R. (2011). Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: Methodological and philosophical foundations. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, 261–292.Google Scholar
Baker, G., & Hacker, P. (1982). The grammar of psychology: Wittgenstein’s “Bemerkungen über die Philosophie der Psychologie.” Language and Communication, 2, 227–244.Google Scholar
Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824.Google Scholar
Boer, D., Hanke, K., & He, J. (2018). On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 713–734.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D. (2008). Latent variable theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 6, 25–53.Google Scholar
Bou Malham, P., & Saucier, G. (2014). Measurement invariance of social axioms in 23 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1046–1060.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2017). The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application. Psicothema, 29, 539–551.Google Scholar
Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420–445.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. (2017). Personality, values, culture: An evolutionary perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. J., Medaglia, J. D., & Jeronimus, B. F. (2018). Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E6106-E6115.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. & Milfont, T. L. (2010). Standardization. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 89–97.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. (2005). Equivalence. In Kempf-Leonard, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (vol. 1, pp. 803–813). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R., & Zenisky, A. (2011). Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 46–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
He, J., Bartram, D., Inceoglu, I., & van de Vijver, F. (2014). Response styles and personality traits: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 216–233.Google Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). A general response style factor: Evidence from a multi-ethnic study in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 794–800.Google Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015a). Effects of a general response style on cross-cultural comparisons: Evidence from the Teaching and Learning International Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 267–290.Google Scholar
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015b). Self-presentation styles in self-reports: Linking the general factors of response styles, personality traits, and values in a longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 129–134.Google Scholar
He, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Domínguez Espinosa, A., Abubakar, A., Dimitrova, R., Adams, B., & Villieux, A. (2015). Socially desirable responding: Enhancement and denial in 20 countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 49, 227–249.Google Scholar
He, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Fetvadjiev, V. H., Dominguez-Espinosa, A., Adams, B. G., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Zhang, R. (2017). On enhancing the cross-cultural comparability of Likert-scale personality and value measures: A comparison of common procedures. European Journal of Personality, 31, 642–657.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jackson, D., & Messick, S. (1958). Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 243–252.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. J., Wood, D., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Harms, P. D., & Roberts, B. W. (2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the behavioral indicators of conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 501–511.Google Scholar
Jang, S., Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Allen, T., Cooper, C. L., Lapiere, L. & Woo, J. M. (2017). Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale across 26 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 560–578.Google Scholar
Johnson, T., Shavitt, S., & Holbrook, A. (2011). Survey response styles across cultures. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 130–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maraun, M. D. (1998). Measurement as a normative practice: Implications of Wittgenstein’s philosophy for measurement in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 8, 435–461.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. L. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.Google Scholar
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.Google Scholar
Michell, J (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355–383.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737–756.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., & van de Vijver, F. (1987). Explaining cross-cultural differences: Bias analysis and beyond. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 259–282.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 2–14.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism and collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kağitçibasi, C., Choi, S. C., & Yoon, G. (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In Vinken, H., Soeters, J., & Ester, P. (eds.), Comparing cultures: Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Leiden, NL: Brill.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.Google Scholar
Selig, J. P., Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2008). Latent variable structural equation modeling in cross-cultural research: Multigroup and multilevel approaches. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 93–119). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50–61.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. (2011). Communication styles as dimensions of national culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 216–233.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., & Fischer, R. (2008). Acquiescence, extreme response bias and culture: A multilevel analysis. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., van Hemert, D. A., & Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Multilevel Analysis of Individuals and Cultures (pp. 285–314). New York: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., & Vignoles, V. L. (2017). Variations in response style by culture and by response format. Paper presented at the ninth regional congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Vignoles, V. L., Becker, M., Owe, E., Easterbrook, M., Brown, R. & Harb, C. (2016). Individual and culture-level components of survey response styles: A multi-level analysis using cultural models of selfhood. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 453–463.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. In Stevens, S. S. (ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Svetina, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2017). Multidimensional measurement invariance in an international context: Fit measure performance with many groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 991–1008.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 4–69.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2000a). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 33–51.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2000b). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, methods and data analytic procedures. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. (eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 17–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119–135.Google Scholar
Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M., Brown., R., & Bond, M. H. (2016). Beyond the “East-West” dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 966–1000.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×