Book contents
- Literature, Spoken Language and Speaking Skills in Second Language Learning
- Literature, Spoken Language and Speaking Skills in Second Language Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Literature and Spoken Language
- Part II Literature and Speaking Skills
- Index
- References
Part II - Literature and Speaking Skills
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 October 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Literature, Spoken Language and Speaking Skills in Second Language Learning
- Literature, Spoken Language and Speaking Skills in Second Language Learning
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Literature and Spoken Language
- Part II Literature and Speaking Skills
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Bal, P. M. and Veltkamp, M. 2013. ‘How does fiction reading influence empathy?An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation’, PLoS ONE 8(1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biber, D. Johansson., S. Leech., G. Conrad, S. and Finnegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Carter, R. 1993. ‘Language awareness and language learning’, in Hoey, M. (ed.), Data, Description, Discourse. London: HarperCollins, 139–150.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. 2018. Compleat Web VP [computer program]. Available at: www.lextutor.ca/vp/comp/ (Accessed 15 May 2018).Google Scholar
Day, R. 1994. ‘Selecting a passage for the EFL reading class’, English Teaching Forum 32(1): 5–15.Google Scholar
Earthman, E. A. 1992. ‘Creating the virtual work: Readers’ processes in understanding literary texts’, Research in the Teaching of English 26(4): 351–384.Google Scholar
Eva-Wood, A. L. 2004. ‘Thinking and feeling poetry: Exploring meanings aloud’, Journal of Educational Psychology 96: 82–91.Google Scholar
Fogal, G. G. 2015. ‘Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign and second language settings: A synthesis of the research’, Language and Literature 24(1): 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, K. 2009. ‘A comparative study of learner corpora of spoken and written discursive language: Focusing on the use of epistemic forms by Japanese EFL learners’, Hiroshima Studies in Language and Language Education 12: 135–150.Google Scholar
Hall, G. 2003. ‘Poetry, pleasure and second language classrooms’, Applied Linguistics 24(3): 395–399.Google Scholar
Hall, G. 2015. Literature in Language Education (2nd edn). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. 1998a. ‘The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and encyclopaedic items’, Poetics 26(2): 63–80.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. 1998b. ‘Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of formalist, stylistic, and conventionalist claims’, Poetics Today 19: 565–580.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. 2001a. ‘The task of poetry reading and second language learning’, Applied Linguistics 22(3): 295–323.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. 2001b. ‘What we know about reading poetry: Theoretical positions and empirical research’, in Steen, G. and Schram, D. (eds.), The Psychology and Sociology of Literary Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 107–128.Google Scholar
Hoffstaedter, P. 1987. ‘Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation’, Poetics 16(1): 75–91.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. 2015. ‘Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9: 1–22.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1960. ‘Linguistics and poetics’, in Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 130–147.Google Scholar
Jones, C. 2016. ‘Teaching spoken stance markers: A comparison of receptive and productive practice’, The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 5(2): 83–100.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. and Nation, P. 1995. ‘Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production’, Applied Linguistics 16(3): 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paran, A. 2008. ‘The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: An evidence-based survey’, Language Teaching 41(4): 465–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, K. 2015. ‘A critical review of cognitive approaches to literary interpretation and comprehension’, Scientific Study of Literature 5(1): 99–128.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. and McCarten, M. 2018. ‘Now you’re talking! Practising conversation in second language learning’, in Jones, C. (ed.), Practice in Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–29.Google Scholar
Mattix, M. 2002. ‘The pleasure of reading poetry in a second language: A response to David Hanauer’, Applied Linguistics 23(4): 515–518.Google Scholar
Nishihara, T. 2016. ‘Of learning and poetics: Exploring strategies used by L2 Japanese English learners’, in Burke, M., Fiahlo, O. and Zyngier, S. (eds.), Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments. London: John Benjamins, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noels, K., Pelletier, L. G., Clement, R. and Vallerand, R. J. 2003. ‘Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory’, Language Learning 53(1): 33–64.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, L. 1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2000. ‘Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation,social development and well-being’, American Psychologist 55(1): 68–78.Google Scholar
Saito, A. 2015. ‘Bridging the gap between L1 and L2 education’, in Teranishi, M., Saito, Y. and Wales (eds.), Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom. London: Palgrave, 41–60.Google Scholar
Saito, Y. 2015. ‘From reading and writing: Creative stylistics as a methodology for bridging the gap between literary appreciation and creative writing in ELT’, in Teranishi, M., Saito, Y. and Wales (eds.), Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom. London: Palgrave, 61–74.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. 1990. ‘The role of consciousness in second language learning’, Applied Linguistics 11(2): 129–158.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. 1985. ‘Language awareness in six easy lessons’, in Donmall, B. G. (ed.), National Congress on Languages in Education Assembly (York, July 1984). NCLE Papers and Reports, 6. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, 33–36.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. 1996. ‘A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction’, Applied Linguistics 17(1): 38–62.Google Scholar
Swain, M. 2005. ‘The output hypothesis: Theory and research’, in Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 471–483.Google Scholar
Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. 1995. ‘Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning’, Applied Linguistics 16(3): 371–391.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. 2015. ‘Literary texts as authentic materials for language learning: The current situation in Japan’, in Teranishi, M., Saito, Y. and Wales (eds.), Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom. London: Palgrave, 26–40.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, R. J. and Wylie, E. C. 2008. ‘Linking English‐language test scores onto the common European framework of reference: An application of standard‐setting methodology’. Available at: www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-08–34.pdf (Accessed 20 May 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. 1951. ‘Do not go gentle into that good night’. Available at: www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/do-not-go-gentle-good-night (Accessed 20 April 2018).Google Scholar
van Peer, W. 1986. Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. 1992. Practical Stylistics: An Approach to Poetry. Oxford: Oxford Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Zyngier, S. 1994. ‘At the crossroads of language and literature: Literary awareness, stylistics, and the acquisition of literary skills in an EFLit context’, PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Zyngier, S. and Fiahlo, O. 2010. ‘Pedagogical stylistics, literary awareness and empowerment: A critical perspective’, Language and Literature 19(1): 13–33.Google Scholar
References
Armstrong, M. 2015. ‘Using literature in an EFL context to teach language and culture’, The Journal of Literature in Language Teaching 4(2): 7–24.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 2001. ‘Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective’, Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1–26. Available at: www.annualreviews.org (Accessed 8 November 2018).Google Scholar
Barfield, A. 2016. ‘Collaboration’, ELT Journal 70(2): 222–224. doi:10.1093/elt/ccv074Google Scholar
Batstone, R. 2010. ‘Issues and options in sociocognition’, in Batstone, R. (ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–23.Google Scholar
Bloemert, J., Paran, A., Jansen, E. and van de Grift, W. 2019. ‘Students’ perspective on the benefits of EFL literature education’, The Language Learning Journal 47(3): 371–384.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Waring, R. and Donkaewbua, S. 2008. ‘Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories’, Reading in a Foreign Language 20(2): 136–163.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. 1985. Language and Literature Teaching: From Practice to Principle. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. and Carter, R. A. 1986. Literature and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carrell, P. L., and Grabe, W. 2010. ‘Reading’, in Schmitt, N. (ed.), An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. London: Hodder Education, 215–231.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and McRae, J. (eds.) 1996. Language, Literature and the Learner: Creative Classroom Practice. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Chen, I. 2018. ‘Incorporating task-based learning in an extensive reading programme’, ELT Journal. Advance online publication. doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy008Google Scholar
Chiang, M. H. 2007. ‘Improved reading attitudes and enhanced English reading comprehensionvia literature circles’, Lagos Papers in English Studies 1: 168–183.Google Scholar
Collie, J. and Slater, S. 1987. Literature in the Language Classroom: A Resource Book of Ideas and Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. 2002. Literature Circles: Voice and Choice in Book Clubs and Reading Groups (2nd edn). Portland, ME: Stenhouse.Google Scholar
Daniels, H. and Steineke, N. 2004. Mini-Lessons for Literature Circles. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Donato, R. 2000. ‘Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom’, in Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–50.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. 1997. ‘Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation’, The Modern Language Journal 81: 482–493.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. 2009. The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. and Murphey, T. 2003. Group Dynamics in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., and Ushioda, E. 2011. Teaching and Researching Motivation (2nd edn). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. and Kobayashi, M. 2010. ‘The intersection of social, cognitive, and cultural processes in language learning: A second language socialization approach’, in Batstone, R. (ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press 76–93.Google Scholar
Fredericks, L. 2012. ‘The benefits and challenges of culturally responsive EFL critical literature circles’, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 55(6): 494–504. doi:10.1002/JAAL.00059Google Scholar
Furr, M. 2004. ‘Literature circles for the EFL classroom’. Available at: www.eflliteraturecircles.com/litcirclesforEFL.pdf (Accessed 8 November 2018).Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A. 2007. ‘Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition’, in van Patten, B. and Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. London: LEA, 175–200.Google Scholar
Green, C. 2005. ‘Integrating extensive reading in the task-based curriculum’, ELT Journal 59(4): 306–311.Google Scholar
Hsu, J.-Y. 2004. ‘Reading without teachers: Literature circles in an EFL classroom’, The Proceedings of 2004 Cross-Strait Conference on English Education: 401–421 Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492558.pdf (Accessed 8 November 2018).Google Scholar
Jeon, E.-Y. and Day, R. R. 2016. ‘The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency:A meta-analysis’,Reading in a Foreign Language 28(2): 246–265.Google Scholar
Kalaja, P., Alanen, R., Palviainen, A. and Dufva, H. 2011. ‘From milk cartons to English roommates: Context and agency in L2 learning beyond the classroom’, in Benson, P. and Reinders, H. (eds.), Beyond the Language Classroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 47–58.Google Scholar
Kim, M. 2004. ‘Literature discussions in adult L2 learning’, Language and Education 18(2): 145–166. doi.org/10.1080/09500780408666872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (ed.) 2002. Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. 2006. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. 2014. Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Theory/Practice Divide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., Thorne, S. L. and Poehner, M. E. 2015. ‘Sociocultural theory and second language development’, in van Patten, B. and Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 207–226.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2007. ‘Reflecting on the cognitive-social debate in second language acquisition’, The Modern Language Journal 91: 773–787.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2010. ‘The dynamic co-adaption of cognitive and social views: A Complexity Theory perspective’, in Batstone, R. (ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40–53.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2016. (an author in) The Douglas Fir Group. ‘A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world’, The Modern Language Journal 100(S1): 19–47. //doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301Google Scholar
LeBlanc, C. 2015. ‘Investigating high school students’ self-efficacy in reading circles’, The Language Teacher 39(1): 15–21.Google Scholar
Long, M. 1996. ‘The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition’, in Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Academic Press, 413–468.Google Scholar
Macalister, J. 2015. ‘Guidelines or commandments? Reconsidering core principles in extensive reading’, Reading in a Foreign Language 27(1): 122–128.Google Scholar
McRae, J. 1996. ‘Representational language learning: from language awareness to text awareness’, in Carter, R. and McRae, J. (eds.), Language, Literature and the Learner: Creative Classroom Practice. Harlow: Longman, 16–40.Google Scholar
Maher, K. M. 2015. ‘EFL literature circles: Collaboratively acquiring language and meaning’, The Language Teacher 39(4): 9–12.Google Scholar
Mercer, N. 2004. ‘Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking’, Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(2): 137–168.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. 2003. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (3rd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nishikawa, M. 2015. ‘How facilitator styles affect overall dynamic of group discussions in EFL contexts’, JACET Journal 59: 151–167.Google Scholar
Ohta, A. S. 2000. ‘Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar’, in Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–78.Google Scholar
Ohta, A. S. 2001. Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L. 2017. Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies: Self-Regulation in Context (2nd edn). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paran, A. 2008. ‘The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: an evidence-based survey’, Language Teaching 41(4): 465–496. doi:10.1017/S026144480800520XGoogle Scholar
Riessman, C. K. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ro, E. 2017. ‘How learning occurs in an extensive reading book club: A conversation analytic perspective’, Applied Linguistics. doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, L. M. 1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2017. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sambolin, A. N. and Carroll, K. S. 2015. ‘Using literature circles in the ESL college classroom: A lesson from Puerto Rico’, Colombian Applied Linguistic Journal 17(2): 193–206. doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.2.a02Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. and Celce-Murcia, M. 2010. An overview of applied linguistics’, in Schmitt, N. (ed.), An Introduction to Applied Linguistics (2nd edn). London: Hodder Education, 1–14.Google Scholar
Schmuck, R. and Schmuck, P. 2000. Group Processes in the Classroom (8th edn). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.Google Scholar
Scotland, J. 2012. ‘Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms’, English Language Teaching 5(9): 9–16. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n9p9Google Scholar
Steffensen, S. and Kramsch, V., C. 2017. ‘The ecology of second language acquisition and socialization’, in Duff, P. A. and May, S. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Language Socialization (3rd edn). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–02327-4_2–1Google Scholar
Shelton-Strong, S. J. 2012. ‘Literature circles in ELT’, ELT Journal 66(2): 214–223. doi:10.1093/elt/ccr049Google Scholar
Swain, M. 2000. ‘The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue’, in Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–114.Google Scholar
Swain, M. 2006. ‘Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency’, in Byrnes, H. (ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum, 95–108.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W. and Brooks, L. 2009. ‘Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French’, The Modern Language Journal 93: 5–29. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00825.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. and Watanabe, Y. 2013. ‘Language: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning’, in Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 3213–3225. doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0664Google Scholar
Teranishi, M., Saito, Y. and Wales, K. (eds.) 2015. Literature and Language Learning in the ELF Classroom. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thibault, P. J. 2011. ‘First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view’, Ecol Psychol 23(3): 210–245. doi:10.1080/10407413.2011.591274Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B. 1997. ‘The role of visualisation in the reading of literature by learners of a foreign language’, PhD dissertation, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. 2000. ‘From input to affordance: Social-interaction learning from an ecological perspective’, in Lantolf, J. P. (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 155–177.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. 2004a. ‘The semiotics and ecology of language learning: Perception, voice, identity and democracy’, Utbildning & Demokrati: Tidskrift för didaktik och utbildningspolitik 13(3): 79–103.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. 2004b. The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. 2007. ‘Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity’, International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1(1): 46–65.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, ed. Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. and Souberman, E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, S. 2007. ‘The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge’, Applied Linguistics 28(1): 46–65. doi:10.1093/applin/aml048Google Scholar
References
Arias Rodríguez, G. L. 2017. ‘Students’ language skills development through short stories’, Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 22(1): 103–118.Google Scholar
Babaee, R. and Yahya, W. R. B. W. 2014. ‘Significance of literature in foreign language teaching’,International Education Studies 7(4): 80.Google Scholar
Badran, D. 2012. ‘Metaphor as argument: A stylistic genre-based approach’, Language and Literature 21(2): 119–135.Google Scholar
Beglar, D., Hunt, A. and Kite, Y. 2012. ‘The effect of pleasure reading on Japanese university EFL learners’ reading rates’, Language Learning 62(3): 665–703.Google Scholar
Boyd, M. and Maloof, V. M. 2000. ‘How teachers can build on student-proposed intertextual links to facilitate student talk in the ESL classroom’, in Hall, J. K. and Verplaetse, L. S. (eds.), Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 163–182.Google Scholar
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.Google Scholar
Bredella, L. and Delanoy, W. 1996. Challenges of Literary Texts in the Foreign Language Classroom. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bulté, B. and Housen, A. 2012. ‘Defining and operationalising L2 complexity’, in Housen, A., Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. (eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 21–46Google Scholar
Bulté, B., Housen, A., Pierrard, M. and Van Daele, S. 2008. ‘Investigating lexical proficiency development over time: The case of Dutch-speaking learners of French in Brussels’, Journal of French Language Studies 18(3): 277–298.Google Scholar
Carter, R. 2007. ‘Foreword’, in Watson, G. and Zyngier, S. (eds.), Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners. London: Palgrave Macmillan, vii–xi.Google Scholar
CEFR. 2016. European Language Portfolio (ELP). Available at: www.coe.int/en/web/portfolio (Accessed 20 September 2017).Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Daller, H., van Hout, R. and Treffers-Daller, J. 2003. ‘Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals’, Applied Linguistics 24: 197–222.Google Scholar
de Graaff, R., Jan Koopman, G., Anikina, Y. and Westhoff, G. 2007. ‘An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL)’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10(5): 603–624.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. and Murphey, T. 2003. Group Dynamics in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erkaya, O. R. 2005. ‘Benefits of using short stories in the EFL context’, Asian EFL Journal 8: 1–13.Google Scholar
Erkaya, O. R. 2011. ‘Advantages of using translated stories from students’ native language to teach EFL’,The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning 1(2): 57–66.Google Scholar
Farrell, T. S. C. 2008. ‘Critical incidents in ELT initial teacher training’, ELT Journal 62(1): 3–10.Google Scholar
Fogal, G. G. 2015. ‘Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign language and second language contexts: A synthesis of empirical research’,Language and Literature 24(1): 54–72.Google Scholar
Fogal, G. G.2019. ‘Tracking microgenetic changes in authorial voice development from a complexity theory perspective’, Applied Linguistics 40(3): 432–455.Google Scholar
Gao, X. 2007. ‘Has language learning strategy research come to an end? A response to Tseng et al. (2006)’, Applied Linguistics 28: 615–620.Google Scholar
Hall, G. 2007. ‘Stylistics in second language contexts: A critical perspective’, in Watson, G. and Zyngier, S. (eds.), Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 3–14.Google Scholar
Hall, G. 2015. ‘Recent developments in Uses of Literature in Language Teaching’, in Teranishi, M., Saito, Y. and Wales, K. (eds.), Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 13–25.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D. 1997. ‘Poetry reading in the second language classroom’, Language Awareness 6: 1–15.Google Scholar
Henry, A. and Thorsen, C. 2018a. ‘Teacher–student relationships and L2 motivation’, The Modern Language Journal 102(1): 218–241.Google Scholar
Henry, A. and Thorsen, C. 2018b. ‘Teachers’ self-disclosures and influences on students’ motivation: A relational perspective’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–15.Google Scholar
Hişmanoğlu, M. 2005. ‘Teaching English through literature’, Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 1(1): 53–66.Google Scholar
Horst, M. and Collins, L. 2006. ‘From faible to strong: How does their vocabulary grow?’, The Canadian Modern Language Review / La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 63(1:) 83–106.Google Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. 2012. ‘Complexity, accuracy and fluency: Definitions, measurement and research’, in Housen, A., Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. (eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–20.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, T. 2007. ‘The effect of manipulating task complexity along the [+ / – here-and-now] dimension on L2 written narrative discourse’, in Garcia Mayo, M. d. P. (ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 136–156.Google Scholar
Kim, M. 2004. ‘Literature discussions in adult L2 learning’,Language and Education 18(2): 145–166.Google Scholar
Koizumi, R. 2005. ‘Speaking performance measures of fluency, accuracy, syntactic complexity, and lexical complexity’, JABAET (Japan-Britain Association for English Teaching) Journal 9: 5–33.Google Scholar
Lachuk, A. J. and Koellner, K. 2015. ‘Performance-based assessment for certification: Insights from edTPA implementation’, Language Arts 93(2): 84–95.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2017. ‘Complexity theory: The lessons continue’, in Ortega, L. and Han, Z. (eds.), Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–50.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. 1994. ‘The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time?’, RELC Journal 25(2): 21–33.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. 1998. ‘The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?’, Applied Linguistics 19(2): 255–271.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. and Nation, P. 1995. ‘Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production’, Applied Linguistics 16(3): 307–322.Google Scholar
Lin, H. 2010. ‘The taming of the immeasurable: An empirical assessment of language awareness’, in Paran A. and Sercu L. (eds.), Testing the Untestable in Language Education. Toronto: Multilingual Matters, 91–216.Google Scholar
Little, D. 2007. ‘Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited’, International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1(1): 14–29.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. and Gass, S. M. 2015. Second Language Research: Methodology and Design (2nd edn). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDevitt, B. 1997. ‘Learner autonomy and the need for learner training’, The Language Learning Journal 16(1): 34–39.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. 2015. ‘Social network analysis and complex dynamic systems’, in Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. and Henry, A. (eds.), Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 73–82.Google Scholar
Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. 2007. ‘The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2’, IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45(3): 241–259.Google Scholar
Nasu, M. 2015. ‘The role of literature in foreign language learning’, in Teranishi, M., Saito, Y. and Wales, K. (eds.), in Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 229–247.Google Scholar
Paesani, K. 2006. ‘“Exercices de style”: Developing multiple competencies through a writing portfolio’,Foreign Language Annals 39(4): 618–639.Google Scholar
Paran, A. 2008. ‘The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: An evidence-based survey’,Language Teaching 41(4): 465–496.Google Scholar
Paran, A. 2017. ‘Interview with Amos Paran, Specialist in L2 reading and literature in language teaching’, Language Teacher 41: 16–19.Google Scholar
Pardede, P. 2011. Using short stories to teach language skills. Journal of English Teaching 1(1): 14–27.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. 2007. ‘Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics’, Applied Linguistics 28: 163–188.Google Scholar
Pinner, R. S. 2019. Social Authentication and Teacher–Student Motivational Synergy: A Narrative of Language Teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, N. M. and Ryave, A. 2002. Systematic Self-observation: A Method for Researching the Hidden and Elusive Features of Everyday Social Life (Vol. 49). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. 1991. Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research (2nd edn). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. 1994. ‘Parametric measures of effect size’, in Cooper H. and Hedges L. V. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Sage, 231–244.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M. D. 2015. ‘Increasing Motivation and Building Bridges to Content with Graded Readers’, in Teranishi, M., Saito, Y. and Wales, K. (eds.), in Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 280–297.Google Scholar
Swain, M. 2010. ‘“Talking-it-through”: Languaging as a source of learning’, in Batstone, R. (ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Second Language Learning and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 112–129.Google Scholar
Thériault, M. 2015. ‘The development of lexical complexity in sixth-grade intensive English students’, Master’s thesis, Université Laval, Québec.Google Scholar
Tono, Y. 2010. CEFR-J を活用するための ‘Can Do’ Descriptor リスト [CEFR-J oral proficiency ‘Can Do’ Descriptor List]. Tono Laboratory. Available at: www.cefr-j.org/ (Accessed 20 September 2017).Google Scholar
Tripp, D. 1993. Critical Incidents in Teaching: Developing Professional Judgement (Education Classic edn). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. 2011. ‘Why autonomy? Insights from motivation theory and research’, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 5(2): 221–232.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. 2014. ‘Motivation, autonomy and metacognition: Exploring their interactions’, in Lasagabaster, D., Doiz, A. and Sierra, J. M. (eds.), Motivation and Foreign Language Learning: From Theory to Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 31–49.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M. H. 2017. ‘Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 pedagogy’, in Ortega, L. and Han, Z. (eds.), Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 144–162.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. J. 2010. ‘A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge about EFL reading’, TESOL Quarterly 44(2): 320–353.Google Scholar
References
Bergsleithner, J. H., Frota, S. N. and Yoshioka, J. K. (eds.) 2013. Noticing and Second Language Acquisition: Studies in Honour of Richard Schmidt. Hawaii: National Foreign language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. and Carter, R. 1986.Literature and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. 2017. ‘Spoken grammar: Where we are and where we are going’?, Applied Linguistics 38(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and McRae, J. 1996.Language, Literature and the Learner: Creative Classroom Practice. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chen, Chen-I. 2018. ‘Incorporating task-based learning in an extensive reading programme’, ELT Journal 72(4): 405–414.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. and Plano Clark, V. L. 2017. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd edn). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. 2012. Motivation in Language Learning. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fogal, G. G. 2015. ‘Pedagogical stylistics in multiple foreign language and second language contexts: A synthesis of empirical research’, Language and Literature 24(1): 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furr, M. 2004. ‘Literature circles for the EFL classroom’. Available at: www.eflliteraturecircles.com/litcirclesforEFL.pdf (Accessed 8 November 2018).Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1972. ‘On communicative competence’, in Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269–293.Google Scholar
Johns, T. 1991. ‘Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning’, English Language Research Journal 4: 1–16.Google Scholar
Jones, C ., Byrne, S. and Halenko, N. 2017. Successful Spoken English: Findings from Learner Corpora. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, C. and Carter, R. 2011.’Literature and language awareness: Using literature to achieve CEFR outcomes’, Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research 1(1): 69–82.Google Scholar
Kim, M. 2004. ‘Literature discussions in adult L2 learning’, Language and Education 18(2): 145–166. doi.org/10.1080/09500780408666872Google Scholar
Lee, H., Warshauer, M. and Lee, J. H. 2018.’The effects of corpus use on second language vocabulary learning: A multilevel meta-analysis’, Applied Linguistics (Advanced Online Access). doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy012Google Scholar
Lin, H. W. 2010. ‘The taming of the immeasurable: An empirical assessment of language awareness’, in Paran, A. and Sercu, L. (eds.), Testing the Untestable in Language Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 191–216.Google Scholar
Long, M. 1996. ‘The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition’, in Richie, W. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press, 413–468.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. and Wiegand, V. 2018. ‘Corpus stylistics, norms and comparsion: Studying speech in Great Expectations’, in Page, R., Busse, B. and Nørgard, N. (eds.), Rethinking Language, Text and Context: Interdisciplinary Research in Stylistics in Honour of Michael Toolan. London: Routledge, 123–143.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. 2010. ‘Spoken fluency revisited’, English Profile Journal. Available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=EPJ.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. and McCarten, J. 2018. ‘Now you’re talking! Practising conversation in second language learning’, in Jones, C. (ed.) Practice in Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–29.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M. and Carter, R. 2007. From Corpus to Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. 1990. ‘The role of consciousness in second language learning XE “language learning”’, Applied Linguistics 11: 129–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. 2010. ‘Attention, awareness and individual differences in language learning’, in Chan, W. M., Chi, S., Cin, K. N., Istanto, J., Nagami, M., Sew, J. W., Suthiwan, T. and Walker, I. (eds.), Proceeding of ClaScc 2010 Singapore December 2–4. Singapore: University of Singapore Center for Language Studies, 721–737.Google Scholar
Smith, R., Kuchah, K. and Lamb, M. 2018. ‘Learner autonomy in developing countries’, in Chik, A., Naoki, N. and Smith, R. (eds.), Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching. London: Palgrave, 7–27.Google Scholar
Timmis, I. 2012. ‘Spoken language research and ELT: Where are we now?’, ELT Journal 66(4): 514–522.Google Scholar
Waring, R. 2006. ‘Why extensive reading should be an indispensable part of all language programs’, The Language Teacher 30(7): 44–47.Google Scholar
Wood, D. 2009. ‘Effects of focused instruction of formulaic sequences on fluent expression in second language narratives: A case study’, Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 12(1): 39–57.Google Scholar
Wray, A. 2005. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar