Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:20:45.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2024

Edited by
Ottavio Quirico  and
Walter Baber
Ottavio Quirico
Affiliation:
University of New England, University for Foreigners of Perugia and Australian National University, Canberra
Walter Baber
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Implementing Climate Change Policy
Designing and Deploying Net Zero Carbon Governance
 , pp. 362 - 394
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalto, P., The New International Energy Charter: instrumental or incremental progress in governance? Energy Research and Social Sciences 2016, 11: 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aalto, P. (ed.), Electrification: Accelerating the Energy Transition. Academic Press/Elsevier, 2021.Google Scholar
Abraham-Dukuma, M. C., Dioha, M. O., Okpaleke, F. N., Bogado, N., Improving the climate change mitigation regime of major emitting countries: the case of South Africa, China, Germany, and the United States of America. Environmental Policy and Governance 2022, 32(1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Baker, A., Water-deprived. Sur – International Journal on Human Rights 2017, 14(25): 37–55.Google Scholar
Achieng Owuor, J., Giessen, L., Prior, L. C., Cilio, D., Winkel, G., Trends in forest-related employment and tertiary education: insights from selected key countries around the globe. European Forest Institute report, 2021. https://efi.int/publications-bank/trends-forest-related-employment-and-tertiary-education-insights-selected-key.Google Scholar
Adolfsen, J. F., Kuik, F., Lis, E. M., Schuler, T., The impact of the war in Ukraine on Euro area energy markets. ECB Economic Bulletin, 2022. www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/economic-bulletin/focus/2022/html/ecb.ebbox202204_01~68ef3c3dc6.en.html.Google Scholar
Agencia EFE, La UE estudia cómo celebrar cumbre con A.Latina al faltar Brasil en CELAC. SwissInfo, 1 October 2021. www.swissinfo.ch/spa/ue-latinoam%C3%A9rica_la-ue-estudia-c%C3%B3mo-celebrar-cumbre-con-a-latina-al-faltar-brasil-en-celac/46995970.Google Scholar
Ahmad, I., The new hydro-political situation in Africa: challenges for Nile River Basin countries. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues 2018, 22(4): 60–75.Google Scholar
Alberici, S., Grimme, W., Toop, G., Biomethane, Production Potentials in the EU: Gas for Climate Report 2022. European Biogas, 2022. www.europeanbiogas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/GfC_national-biomethane-potentials_070722.pdf.Google Scholar
Albrecht, G., The age of Solastalgia. The Conversation, 7 August 2012. https://theconversation.com/the-age-of-solastalgia-8337.Google Scholar
Alogna, I., Clifford, E., Climate Change Litigation: Comparative and International Perspectives. British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2020.Google Scholar
Alogna, I., Bakker, C., Gauci, J.-P., Climate change litigation: global perspectives, in Alogna, I., Bakker, C., Gauci, J.-P. (eds.), Climate Change Litigation. Brill, Nijhoff, 2021, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Al-Qahtani, A., Parkinson, B., Hellgardt, K., Shah, N., Guillen-Gosalbez, G., Uncovering the true cost of hydrogen production routes using life cycle monetisation. Applied Energy 2021, 281: 115958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P., The ‘not-a-cat’ syndrome: can the international human rights regime accommodate non-state actors?, in Alston, P. (ed.), Non-State Actors and Human Rights. Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
Alterman, J. B., Hall, N., Todman, W., Sustainable States. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2021.Google Scholar
Andersen, A. D., On digitalization and sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2021, 41: 96–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, M. S., Border adjustment with taxes or allowances to level the price of carbon, in Ashiabor, H., Milne, J. E., Hymel, M., Kreiser, L. (eds.), Innovation Addressing Climate Change Challenges. Edward Elgar, 2018, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., Bulkeley, H., Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics 2009, 9: 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristova, E., O’Regan, C. (eds.), Civil Liability for Human Rights Violations: A Handbook for Practitioners. Bonavero Institute for Human Rights, 2022.Google Scholar
Arko, A., A Canadian border carbon adjustment? GATT compliance and underexplored exceptions. Global Trade & Customs Journal 2021, 16(9): 446–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, A., Climate Change and Storytelling. Narratives and Cultural Meaning in Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
Arvind, T. T., Stirton, L., Explaining the reception of the Code Napoleon in Germany: a fuzzy set qualitative analysis. Legal Studies 2010, 30(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascensão, F., Fahrig, L., Clevenger, A. P., et al., Environmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nature Sustainability 2018, 1: 206–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayuso, A., CIDOB – Claves para Reactivar la Asociación UE-CELAC y Encauzar la Globalización del Futuro. March 2021. www.cidob.org/ca/publicacions/series_de_publicacio/notes_internacionals/247/claves_para_reactivar_la_asociacion_ue_celac_y_encauzar_la_globalizacion_del_futuro.Google Scholar
Baber, W. F., The arts of the natural: Herbert Simon and artificial intelligence. Public Administration Quarterly 1988, 12(3): 329–347.Google Scholar
Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Deliberative Environmental Politics. MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Global Democracy and Sustainable Jurisprudence. MIT Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Consensus and Global Environmental Governance: Deliberative Democracy in Nature’s Regime. MIT Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Democracy and climate justice: the unfolding tragedy, in Bhavnani, K. K., Foran, J., Kurian, P. A., Munshi, D. (eds.), Climate Futures: Reimaging Global Climate Justice. ZED Publishing, 2019, pp. 143–151.Google Scholar
Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Environmental Human Rights in Earth System Governance. Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baber, W. F., Bartlett, R. V., Democratic Norms of Earth System Governance: Deliberative Politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacchus, J., Legal issues with the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. CATO Briefing Paper no. 125, 2021.Google Scholar
Backer, L., Considering a Treaty on Corporations and Human Rights: mostly failures but with a glimmer of success, in Černič, J., Santarelli, N. (eds.), The Future of Business and Human Rights: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for a UN Treaty. Intersentia Press, 2018, pp. 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banya, N., Reid, H., Insight: In Zimbabwe, coal power project seeks other backing after China’s U-turn. Reuters 2022. www.reuters.com/business/energy/zimbabwe-coal-power-project-seeks-other-backing-after-chinas-u-turn-2022-03-30.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, K., Lula’s victory in Brazil comes just in time to save the Amazon – can he do it? The Conversation, 2 November 2022 (Australia and New Zealand edition). https://theconversation.com/lulas-victory-in-brazil-comes-just-in-time-to-save-the-amazon-can-he-do-it-193618.Google Scholar
Barak, O., The failure of the Israeli–Palestinian peace process, 1993–2000. Journal of Peace Research 2005, 42(6): 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, S., Mulholland, E., Directors’ Liability and Climate Risk: Comparative Paper – Australia, Canada, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Commonwealth Climate and Law Initiative, 2019.Google Scholar
Barry, T., Daviðsdóttir, B., Einarsson, N., Yung, O. R., How does the Arctic Council support conservation of Arctic biodiversity? Sustainability 2020, 12: 5042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barteková, E., Börkey, P., Digitalisation for the transition to a resource efficient and circular economy. OECD Environment Working Papers no. 192, 2022.Google Scholar
Bartlet, J., Familiar Quotations. Little, Brown and Co., 10th ed., 2019.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, L., Carman, R., Jo, Y., Latin America and the Caribbean – the state of climate ambition. United Nations Development Programme, June 2022. https://climatepromise.undp.org/sites/default/files/research_report_document/Climate%20Ambition-LAC-ENG_v6.pdf.Google Scholar
Baztan, J., Vanderlinden, J.-P., Jaffrès, L., Jorgensen, B., Zhu, Z., Facing climate injustices: community trust-building for climate services through arts and sciences narrative co-production. Climate Risk Management (2020) 28 100253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belkhir, L. and Elmeligi, A., Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: trends to 2040 & recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 177: 448–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellora, C., Fontagné, L., Possible carbon adjustment policies: an overview. Report to the European Parliament, 2020.Google Scholar
Belmans, R., dos Reis, P. C., Viengerhoets, P., Electrification and Sustainable Fuels: Competing for Wind and Sun. Florence: European University Institute, 2021. https://fsr.eui.eu/publications/?handle=1814/71402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengo, I., Boni, L., Sancino, A., EU financial regulations and social impact measurement practices: a comprehensive framework on finance for sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2022, 29(4): 809–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L., The duty of due consideration in the Anthropocene: climate risk and English directorial duties. Carbon and Climate Law Review 2017, 11(2): 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L., The road to Paris runs through Delaware: climate litigation and directors’ duties. Utah Law Review 2020, 2(1): 313–381.Google Scholar
Benjamin, L., Companies and Climate Change. Theory and Law in the United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L., Bhargava, A., Franta, B., et al., Climate-washing litigation: legal liability for misleading climate communications. Policy briefing. The Climate Social Science Network, 2022.Google Scholar
Bennis, A., Power surge: how the European green deal can succeed in Morocco and Tunisia. European Council on Foreign Relations, 26 January 2021. https://ecfr.eu/publication/power-surge-how-the-european-green-deal-can-succeed-in-morocco-and-tunisia.Google Scholar
Benson, C., Yim, C., Orlowski, V., The Energy Charter Treaty, in Bishop, D., Kaiser, G. (eds.), The Guide to Energy Arbitrations, 2nd ed. Law Business Research Ltd, 2017, p. 33.Google Scholar
Bergkamp, L., Brouwer, K. M., The human right to a safe climate – putting democracy under judicial guardianship. RealClear Energy, 2021. www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2021/06/21/the_human_right_to_a_safe_climate__putting_democracy_under_judicial_guardianship_782320.html.Google Scholar
Berhe, E. G., Morocco Green Economy Financing Facility (GEFF), EU External Investment Plan – European Commission, 14 January 2020. https://ebrdgeff.com/morocco_facilities.Google Scholar
Berhe, E. G., South Africa, International Partnerships – European Commission, 27 September 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/where-we-work/south-africa_en.Google Scholar
Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Berman, H. J., Law and Revolution II: The Impact of the Protestant Reformation on the Western Legal Tradition. Harvard University Press, 2003, pp. 53–54.Google Scholar
Bernard, K. N., State of forest genetic resources in Kenya. Working Paper, The Sub-regional Workshop FAO/IPGRI/ICRAF on the conservation, management, sustainable utilization and enhancement of forest genetic resources in Sahelian and North-Sudanian Africa, 22–24 September 1998. www.fao.org/3/ab396e/ab396e.pdf.Google Scholar
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N., Brauch, M. D., Redesigning the Energy Charter Treaty to advance the low-carbon transition. Transnational Dispute Management 2019, 1.Google Scholar
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N., Brauch, M. D., Cosbey, A., et al., Treaty on sustainable investment for climate change mitigation and adaptation: aligning international investment law with the urgent need for climate change action. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 7–35.Google Scholar
Beshtawi, A., The human right to water and the realisation of water rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Utrecht Law Review 2020, 16(2): 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyene, S., Ethiopia: Meles Zanawi’s ploy for Copenhagen Conference. Ethiopian Review 23 November 2009. www.ethiopianreview.com/index/11401.Google Scholar
Bińczyk, E., Epoka człowieka. Retoryka i marazm antropocenu [The Era of Man. Rhetoric and the Stagnation of the Anthropocene]. PWN Scientific Publishing House, 2018.Google Scholar
Birol, F., What does the current global energy crisis mean for energy investment? IEA Commentary, 13 May 2022. www.iea.org/commentaries/what-does-the-current-global-energy-crisis-mean-for-energy-investment.Google Scholar
Bishop, R., Collaborative storytelling: meeting indigenous people’s desires for self-determination. Paper presented at the World Indigenous People’s Conference, Albuquerque, NM, June 15–22, 1999.Google Scholar
Blackmon, D., China drives dramatic rise in global emissions in 2021. Forbes, 26 August 2021. www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2021/08/26/china-drives-dramatic-rise-in-global-coal-usage-in-2021/?sh=1cb37f2e3193.Google Scholar
Blaser, M., Storytelling Globalization from the Chaco and Beyond. Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Blay, S. K. N., New trends in the protection of the Antarctic environment: the 1991 Madrid Protocol. American Journal of International Law 1992, 86: 377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobylev, S. N., Chereshnya, O. Yu., Kulmala, M., et al., Sustainability indicators for digitalization of sustainable development goals in PEEX program. Geography, Environment, Sustainability 2018, 11(1): 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D., The legal character of the Paris Agreement. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 2016, 25(2): 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D., The role of the International Court of Justice in addressing climate change: some preliminary reflections. Arizona State Law Journal 2017, 49: 689–712.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D., The ocean and climate change law. Exploring the relationships, in Barnes, R., Long, R. (eds.), Frontiers in International Environmental Law: Oceans and Climate Challenges. Essays in Honour of David Freestone, Brill, 2021, p. 317.Google Scholar
Boehme-Neßler, V., Grenzüberschreitung: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht mach Klimapolitik. Cash.online, 2021. www.cash-online.de/recht-steuern/2021/grenzueberschreitung-das-bundesverfassungsgericht-macht-klimapolitik/565281.Google Scholar
Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., Rutherford, T. F., Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments. Nature Climate Change 2022, 12: 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, P., Després, M., da Silva, L. A. P., Samama, F., Svartzman, R., The Green Swan: Central Banking and Financial Stability in the Age of Climate Change. Bank for International Settlements, 2020. www.bis.org/publ/othp31.htm.Google Scholar
Bomberg, E., The 2020 US election and its climate consequences. Environmental Politics 2021, 20(5): 854–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneuil, C., The geological turn: narratives of the Anthropocene, in Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C., Gemenne, F. (eds.), The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis. Routledge, 2015, pp. 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookchin, M., The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. AK Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Boswell, J., The Life of Samuel Johnson, 1791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, I., Net zero is the energy answer to Russian aggression. The New Statesman, 24 February 2022.Google Scholar
Boute, A., Combating climate change through investment arbitration. Fordham International Law Journal 2012, 25(3): 613–664.Google Scholar
Bouwer, K., The unsexy future of climate change litigation. Journal of Environmental Law 2018, 30: 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, D. M. J. S., What is the relevance of pyrogeography to the Anthropocene? The Anthropocene Review 2015, 2(1): 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. R., The Environmental Rights Revolution. University of British Columbia Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Boyd, P. W., Bach, L. T., Hurd, C. L., et al., Potential negative effects of ocean afforestation on offshore ecosystems. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2022, 6: 675–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boykoff, M. T., Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, A., The Brussels effect. Northwestern University Law Review 2012, 107: 1.Google Scholar
Bradford, A., The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branford, S., Torres, M., As climate summit unfolds, no Biden–Bolsonaro Amazon deal forthcoming. Mongabay News, 22 April 2021. https://news.mongabay.com/2021/04/as-climate-summit-unfolds-no-biden-bolsonaro-amazon-deal-forthcoming.Google Scholar
Brauch, M. D., Tackling climate change through sustainable investment: all in a Treaty? IISD SDG Knowledge hub, 2018. http://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/guest-articles/tackling-climate-change-through-sustainable-investment-all-in-a-treaty.Google Scholar
Braun, S., Opinion: EU Green Deal can spark a decarbonization revolution. Deutsche Welle, 11 December 2019. www.dw.com/en/opinion-eu-green-deal-can-spark-a-decarbonization-revolution/a-51623313.Google Scholar
Bremmer, I., The Power of Crisis. Simon and Schuster, 2022.Google Scholar
Brewer, R., Conservancy: The Land Trust Movement in America. Dartmouth College Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Brimont, L., Saujot, M. Affichage environnemental alimentaire: révéler les visions pour construire un compromise politique. Iddri, October 2021. www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/PDF/Publications/Catalogue%20Iddri/Etude/202110-ST0821-AE_1.pdf.Google Scholar
Brock, T., A conversation with Max Boykoff: climate change and the media. Boulder Magazine, 2016. https://getboulder.com/conversation-max-boykoff-climate-change-media.Google Scholar
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B. V., A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science: Using Practice to Inform Theory. Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Bruggeman, V., Delvaux, B., EU energy policy and legislation under pressure since the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol, in Peeters, M., Deketelaere, K. (eds.), EU Climate Change Policy: The Challenge of New Regulatory Initiatives. Edward Elgar, 2006, p. 233.Google Scholar
Brulle, R. J., The climate lobby: a sectoral analysis of lobbying spending on climate change in the USA, 2000 to 2016. Climatic Change 2018, 149: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunkhorst, H., Sociological constitutionalism: an evolutionary approach, in Blokker, P. and Thornhill, C. (eds.), Sociological Constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 95–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, S., The Global Commons. An Introduction. Island Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Budziszewska, M., Jak opowiedzieć powagę zmiany klimatu, Zmieniamy opowieść. Kryzys klimatyczny jako kryzys wyobraźni Jak opowiedzieć powagę zmiany klimatu (radio program episode, Audycje TOK FM, 8 December 2021), https://audycje.tokfm.pl/podcast/115516,Jak-opowiedziec-powage-zmiany-klimatu.Google Scholar
Buell, L., The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Burgers, L., Should judges make climate change law? Transnational Environmental Law 2020, 9: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgers, L., An apology leading to dystopia: or, why fuelling climate change is tortious. Transnational Environmental Law 2022, 11(2): 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burinskienė, A., Seržantė, M., Digitalisation as the indicator of the evidence of sustainability in the European Union. Sustainability 2022, 14(14): 8371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butmeh, A., Palestine is a climate justice issue. Al Jazeera, 28 November 2019. www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/11/28/palestine-is-a-climate-justice-issue.Google Scholar
Cabuzel, T., The EU and Morocco form a green partnership on energy, climate and the environment ahead of COP 26. Climate Action – European Commission, 28 June 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/eu-and-morocco-form-green-partnership-energy-climate-and-environment-ahead-cop-26_en.Google Scholar
Cameron, E., Mearns, R., McGrath, J. T., Translating climate change: adaptation, resilience, and climate politics in Nunavut, Canada. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2015, 105(2): 274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C., Trigo, A., A vision for green foreign direct investment: proposals for an investor–state collaborative effort. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 135–160.Google Scholar
Carlarne, C. P., The essential role of climate litigation and the courts in averting climate crisis, in Mayer, B., Zahar, A. (eds), Debating Climate Law. Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casalini, F. and González, J. L., Trade and cross-border data flows. OECD paper, 2019.Google Scholar
Cascão, A. E., Nicol, A., GERD: new norms of cooperation in the Nile Basin? Water 2016, 41(4): 550–573.Google Scholar
Casier, T., The rise of energy to the top of the EU–Russia agenda: from interdependence to dependence? Geopolitics 2011, 16(3): 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castree, N., The Anthropocene and the environmental humanities: extending the conversation. Environmental Humanities 2014, 5(1): 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, L. A., Blomquist, G. C., Environmental policy in the European Union: fostering the development of pollution havens? Ecological Economics 2008, 65: 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenevska, I., A thundering silence: environmental rights in the dialogue between the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Environmental Law 2016, 28: 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, D., The climate of history: four theses. Critical Inquiry 2009, 35(2): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, D. S. W., Asymmetric bargaining between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone Dam controversy: social opposition akin to David’s stone against Goliath. Pacific Review 2017, 30: 674–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, D. A., Lickel, B., Markowitz, E. M., Reassessing emotion in climate change communication. Nature Climate Change 2017, 7(12): 850–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, O., Abdelhalim, A., Liu, Y., Rico-Ramirez, M., Han, D., Climate change adaptations for food security in vulnerable areas of the Egyptian Nile – For tackling the overlooked nexus hazards of hydrological extremes and waste pollutions. Water 2021, 13(4): 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Colloff, M. J., Lukasiewicz, A., Pittock, J., A trickle, not a flood: environmental watering in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 2021, 72(5): 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., The green investment principles: from a nodal governance perspective. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2023, 23: 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09595-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, A., Massachusetts just passed a massive Climate and Clean Energy Bill. Washington Post, 11 August 2022.Google Scholar
Cho, R., Can soil help combat climate change? Columbia University News (2018). https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2018/02/21/can-soil-help-combat-climate-change.Google Scholar
Christel, L., Gutierrez, R., Making rights come alive. Journal of Environment & Development 2017, 26(3): 322–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A., Justwan, F., Carlisle, J. E., Clark, M., Polarization politics and hopes for a green agenda in the United States. Environmental Politics 2020, 29(4): 719–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R., Water: The International Crisis. Earthscan, 1991.Google Scholar
Clinton, B., Knittel, C., Metaxoglou, K., Electrifying transport: issues and opportunities, in Glachant, J.-M., Joskow, P., Pollitt, M. (eds.), Handbook on Electricity Markets. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.Google Scholar
Closas, A., Villholth, K. G., Groundwater governance: addressing core concepts and challenges. WIREs Water 2020, 7(1): e1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coenen, J., Bager, S., Meyfroidt, P., Newig, J., Challies, E., Environmental governance of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Policy and Governance 2021, 31: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, H., Ebbersmeyer, A. S., Helm, L. M., Røssaak, M. K., Judging climate change: the role of the judiciary in the fight against climate change. Oslo Law Review 2020, 7(3): 168–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, H., Newlyn, C., Climate change will reshape Russia. Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 2021. www.csis.org/analysis/climate-change-will-reshape-russia.Google Scholar
Conway, D., Nicholls, R. J., Brown, S., et al., The need for bottom-up assessments of climate risks and adaptation in climate-sensitive regions. Nature Climate Change 2019, 9(7): 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, B. R., de Lourdes Melo Zurita, M., Fulfilling the promise of participation by not resuscitating the deficit model. Global Environmental Change 2019, 56: 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, B., Rosneft, Gazprom, and Russia’s failure to adopt green policies. Policy note, Foreign Policy Research Institute, 2021.Google Scholar
Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., Munnings, C., Developing guidance for implementing border carbon adjustments: lessons, cautions, and research needs from the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2019, 13(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudert, F. R., Non-belligerency in international law. Virginia Law Review 1942, 29(2): 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozzi, L., Gould, T., What would it take to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5°C? 2019. www.iea.org/commentaries/what-would-it-take-to-limit-the-global-temperature-rise-to-15c.Google Scholar
Crawford, J., Second report on state responsibility, UN Doc. A/ CN.4/ 498 and Add.1–4 Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1999, II(1): 3.Google Scholar
Crippa, M. D., Guizzardi, D., Solazzo, E., et al., GHG Emissions of All World Countries – 2021 Report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2021.Google Scholar
Cullell, J. M., El programa electoral de Lula da Silva: subidas de impuestos a los ricos y protección a las minorías. El País (30 October 2022). https://elpais.com/internacional/2022-10-30/el-programa-electoral-de-lula-da-silva-subidas-de-impuestos-a-los-ricos-y-proteccion-a-las-minorias.html.Google Scholar
Da Cunha, C., Rochas, A. P. F., Cardon, M., et al., Adaptation planning in France: inputs from narratives of change in support of a community-led foresight process. Climate Risk Management 2020, 30: 100243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damaska, M. R., The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
David, R., Brierley, J. E. C., Major Legal Systems in the World Today. Stevens & Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
Davidson, H., Morton, A., Molan, L., The frontline inside Australia’s climate emergency: the killer . The Guardian (2021). www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2020/feb/27/killer-heat-how-a-warming-land-is-changing-australia-forever.Google Scholar
Davis, K. F., Dalin, C., Kummu, M., et al., Beyond the green revolution: a roadmap for sustainable food systems research and action. Environmental Research Letters 2022, 17: 100401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davydova, Y., Record breaking fires in Siberia. 2021. www.greenpeace.org/international/story/49171/russia-record-breaking-fires-siberia.Google Scholar
De Graaf, K. J., Jans, J. H., The Urgenda decision: Netherlands liable for role in causing dangerous global climate change. Journal of Environmental Law 2015, 27: 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Groen, W.P., Alcidi, C., Simonelli, F., et al., Study on the non-financial reporting directive – final report. CEPS, 2020.Google Scholar
De la Esperanza Mata, Pérez, M., Scholten, D., Stegen, K. S., The multi-speed energy transition in Europe: opportunities and challenges for EU energy security. Energy Strategy Reviews 2019, 26: 100415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Luca, A. Renewable energy in the EU, the Energy Charter Treaty, and Italy’s withdrawal therefrom. Transnational Dispute Management 2015, 1. www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2232.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, A. (Reeve, H., trans.), Democracy in America. Schocken Books, 1961.Google Scholar
Delbeke, J., A way forward for a carbon border adjustment mechanism by the EU. STG Policy Brief, 2020. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/69155.Google Scholar
Delforge, P., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, S., Home Idle load: devices wasting huge amounts of electricity when not in active use. NRDC Issue Paper, 2015.Google Scholar
Demerew, K., From Red Sea to the Nile: water, power, and politics in northeast Africa. Third World Quarterly 2021, 42(12): 2883–2901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deva, S., Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations – Humanizing Business. Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Division on Earth and Life Studies National Research Council of the National Academies, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration. The National Academies Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Dobrowolska, L., Ormond-Skeaping, T., Luki w narracjach o klimacie (interview by Aleksandra Lipczak, Przekrój, 22 July 2020). https://przekroj.pl/kultura/luki-w-narracjach-o-klimacie-aleksandra-lipczak.Google Scholar
Doix, V., Border tax adjustments: qualification and interactions with the international trade system. Revue internationale de droit économique 2020, 3: 319–342.Google Scholar
Dough, H. The impact of new and emerging internet technologies on climate change and human rights. Submission to the Advisory Committee to the UN Human Rights Council (2019).Google Scholar
Drahos, P., Survival Governance: Energy and Climate in the Chinese Century (2021) Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, I., Erixon, F. and Winkler, R., The quest for gas market competition fighting Europe’s dependency on Russian gas more effectively. Research Report No. 1/2010, ECIPE Occasional Paper. www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/174707.Google Scholar
Dumitru, A., Kölbl, B., Wijffelaars, M., The carbon border adjustment mechanism explained (July 16, 2021). https://economics.rabobank.com/publications/2021/july/cbam-carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism-eu-explained.Google Scholar
Durán, G. M., EU carbon border adjustment mechanism: key issues going forward. European Foreign Affairs Review 2021, 26(4): 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürbeck, G., Hüpkes, P., The Anthropocenic Turn: The Interplay between Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Responses to a New Age. Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., et al., Climate change and COP26: are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management 2022, 63: 102456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckes, C., The Urgenda case is separation of powers at work. Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-39, 2021.Google Scholar
Eckes, C., Separation of powers in climate cases. Comparing cases in Germany and the Netherlands. Verfassungsblog (2022). https://verfassungsblog.de/separation-of-powers-in-climate-cases.Google Scholar
Efron, S., Fischbach, J. R., Blum, I., Karimov, R. I., Moore, M., The Public Health Impacts of Gaza’s Water Crisis: Analysis and Policy Options. RAND Corporation, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, K., Imagination in Teaching and Learning: The Middle School Years. University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Eguegu, O., Does Guinea’s coup matter to China? The Diplomat (21 September 2021). https://thediplomat.com/2021/09/does-guineas-coup-matter-to-china.Google Scholar
Eilperin, J., Dennis, B., Muyskens, J., Tracking Biden’s environmental actions. Washington Post, 26 May 2022.Google Scholar
Ekholm, B., Rockström, J., Digital technology can cut global emissions by 15%. Here’s how (2019). www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/why-digitalization-is-the-key-to-exponential-climate-action.Google Scholar
Elrifai, S. N., Rusinek, H., Sinsel, S. R., A model multilateral treaty for the encouragement of investment in climate change mitigation and adaptation. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Sayed, M. K., Mansour, R. S., Water scarcity as a non-traditional threat to security in the Middle East. India Quarterly 2017, 73(2): 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshirbiny, H., Abrahamse, W., Public risk perception of climate change in Egypt: a mixed methods study of predictors and implications. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2020, 10(3): 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englisch, J., Falcão, T., EU carbon border adjustments and WTO law, part one. Environmental Law Reporter 2021, 51(10): 10857.Google Scholar
Epp, C., Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, C. R. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and the Supreme Court in Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelidis, H., Davies, R., Are you aware of your digital carbon footprint? 2021. www.capgemini.com/gb-en/insights/expert-perspectives/are-you-aware-of-your-digitalcarbon-footprint.Google Scholar
Fabrichnaya, Y., Russia says Czech oil supply cut ‘not political’. 15 July 2008. www.reuters.com/article/czech-russia-oil-idUSL1451616820080714.Google Scholar
Fairfax, S. K., Gwin, L., King, M. A., Raymond, L., Watt, L. A., Buying Nature: The Limits of Land Acquisition as a Conservation Strategy, 1780–2004. MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Fajardy, M., Reiner, D., Electrification of residential and commercial heating, in Glachant, J.-M., Joskow, P., Pollitt, M. (eds.), Handbook on Electricity Markets. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.Google Scholar
Falefuafua Tapu, I., Finding Fonua: disappearing Pacific Island Nations, sea level rise, and cultural rights. Arizona Law Review 2020, 63: 785–803.Google Scholar
Falkner, R., Buzan, B., Great Powers, Climate Change, and Global Environmental Responsibilities. Oxford University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, N., Empire and Jihad: The Anglo-Arab Wars of 1870–1920. Yale University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Fehske, A., Fettweis, G., Malmodin, J., Biczok, G., The global footprint of mobile communications: the ecological and economic perspective. IEEE Communications Magazine 2011, 49(8): 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhendler, I., The securitization of water discourse: theoretical foundations, research gaps and objectives of the special issue. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2015, 15(3): 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, E., Climate change litigation, obsession and expertise: reflecting on the scholarly response to Massachusetts v. EPA. Law & Policy 2013, 35(3): 236–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M., Responsibility and climate change. German Yearbook of International Law 2010, 53: 89–138.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M., The Kyoto Protocol Compliance Regime and Treaty Law. Singapore Yearbook of International Law 2004, 8: 23.Google Scholar
Flitter, E., There’s a new cop on the banking beat: chief climate risk officer. New York Times, 12 September 2022.Google Scholar
Fløttum, K., Gjerstad, Ø., Narratives in climate change discourse. WIREs Climate Change 2017, 8(1): e429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fofack, H., A competitive Africa. Finance & Development 2018, 55(4): 48+.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 2006, 16: 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonfara, T., Storino, B., Fochesatto, A., Rosetto, A., La disolución de la UNASUR: un análisis desde el realism. Córdoba Global – Centro de Estudios Internacionales (9 September 2019). https://cbaglobal.com.ar/la-disolucion-de-la-unasur-un-analisis-desde-el-realismo.Google Scholar
Forster, C. E., Novel climate tort? The New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Smith v. Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited and others. Environmental Law Review 2022, 24(3): 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, W., Bals, C., Grimm, J., The case of Huaraz: first climate lawsuit on loss and damage against an energy company before German courts., in Mechler, R., Schinko, T., Surminski, S., Linneroth-Bayer, J. (eds.), Loss and Damage from Climate Change. Springer, 2019, pp. 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franta, B., Weaponizing economics: big oil, economic consultants, and climate policy delay. Environmental Politics 2022, 31(4): 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman-Maloy, D., Remembering Balfour: empire, race and propaganda. Race & Class 2018, 59(3): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D., Kotzé, L. J. (eds.), Research Handbook on Law, Governance and Planetary Boundaries. Edward Elgar, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, L., Tankersley, J., After signing climate bill, Biden plans more actions to cut emissions. New York Times, 19 August 2022.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., A Friedman doctrine – the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970.Google Scholar
Gaja, G., Fourth Report on the Responsibility of International Organisations, UN Doc. A/CN.4/564.Google Scholar
Galica, M., Marczuk, M., How to word it: the nature and climate change narrative’s shortcomings. The Twenties (2021). https://lata-dwudzieste.pl/en.Google Scholar
Galiffa, C., Bercero, I. G., How WTO-consistent tools can ensure the decarbonization of emission-intensive industrial sectors. American Journal of International Law 2022, 116: 196–201.Google Scholar
Ganguly, G., Setzer, J., Heyvaert, V., If at first you don’t succeed: suing corporations for climate change. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2018, 38(4): 841–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, R., Argentina asume liderazgo de Celac en medio de tensión por DD.HH en la region. SwissInfo (7 January 2022). www.swissinfo.ch/spa/celac-reuni%C3%B3n_argentina-asume-liderazgo-de-celac-en-medio-de-tensi%C3%B3n-por-dd-hh-en-la-regi%C3%B3n/47246072.Google Scholar
Garside, M., Global cobalt reserves by country 2020. Statista (16 February 2021). www.statista.com/statistics/264930/global-cobalt-reserves.Google Scholar
Garton Ash, T., I went viral in Germany for a meme about Scholzing – but the Chancellor’s hesitancy over Ukraine is no joke. The Guardian, 4 February 2023. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/03/germany-olaf-scholz-twitter-ukraine.Google Scholar
Gebresenbet, F., Wondemagegnehu, D. Y., New dimensions in the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam negotiations: ontological security in Egypt and Ethiopia. African Security 2021, 14(1): 80–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, M., Kent, A., Sustainable development and international investment agreements: from objective to practice, in De Mestral, A., Lévesque, C. (eds.), Improving International Investment Agreements. Routledge, 2013, pp. 286–288.Google Scholar
Gerrard, M. B., Climate change litigation in the United States: high volume of cases, mostly about statutes, in Alogna, I., Bakker, C., Gauci, J.-P. (eds.), Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives Brill Nijhoff, 2021, p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertner, J., The Ice at the End of the World. Random House, 2019.Google Scholar
Ghaleigh, N. S., Rossati, D., The spectre of carbon border-adjustment measures. Climate Law 2011, 2(1): 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, A., The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giakoumis, T., Voulvoulis, N., The transition of EU water policy towards the Water Framework Directive’s Integrated River Basin Management Paradigm. Environmental Management 2018, 62(5): 819–831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gifford, D. G., Climate change and the public law model of torts: reinvigorating judicial restraint doctrines. South Carolina Law Review 2010, 62: 202–259.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Reckoning with Risk. Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T., How authoritarians use international law. Journal of Democracy 2020, 31(4): 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giordano, M., Bassini, E., Climate change and Africa’s future. Governance in an Emerging World [Winter Series 2019], no. 119. Hoover Institution. www.hoover.org/research/climate-change-and-africas-future.Google Scholar
Glachant, J.-M., Reforming the EU Internal Electricity Market in the Middle of a Huge Energy Crisis: An Absolute Short-Term Emergency or Preparation for the Future? European University Institute, 2023.Google Scholar
Gleick, P. H., Water and conflict: fresh water resources and international security. International Security 1993, 18(1): 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godson, A., King or pawn? Where does REPowerEU leave Europe? 2022. https://eurocities.eu/latest/king-or-pawn-where-does-repowereu-leave-europe.Google Scholar
Goldberg, P., Climate change lawsuits are ineffective political stunts. The Hill, 2018. https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/376307-climate-change-lawsuits-are-showy-ineffective-political-stunts.Google Scholar
Golding, G., A critical comparison of the schemes of the French and German codes. Irish Jurist 1971, 6(2): 305–322.Google Scholar
Golnaraghi, M., Setzer, J., Brook, N., Lawrence, W., Williams, L., Climate Change Litigation – Insights into the Evolving Global Landscape. The Geneva Association: 2021.Google Scholar
Goodman, M. P., Thandani, A., Wayland, M., Global Gateway’s Infrastructure Plan for Africa Announced at EU–AU Summit, Center for Strategic and International Studies (28 February 2022). www.csis.org/analysis/global-gateways-infrastructure-plan-africa-announced-eu-au-summit.Google Scholar
Goren, S. L. (trans.), The German Civil Code: (as amended to January 1, 1992): And the Introductory Act to the Civil Code of August 15, 1896 (including amendments to January 1, 1992): And the Act on the Liability for Defective Products of December 15, 1989, Revised Edition. Fred B. Rothman & Co., 1994.Google Scholar
Gottschall, J., The Storytelling Human: How Stories Make Us Human. Mariner Books, 2013.Google Scholar
Grab, A., Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Palgrave, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradoni, L., Mantovani, M., No kidding! Mapping youth-led climate change litigation across the north-south divide. Verfassungsblog (24 March 2022). https://verfassungsblog.de/no-kidding.Google Scholar
Grafton, R. Q., Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the ‘do’s’ and ‘do’nots’. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2019, 63(1): 116–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramaglia, C., Why is there no environmental justice movement in France? Analyze und Kritik 2014, 2: 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, S., Why your internet habits are not as clean as you think. BBC (6 March 2020), www.bbc.com/future/article/20200305-why-your-internet-habits-are-not-as-clean-as-you-think.Google Scholar
Grinberg, M., Wartime commercial policy and trade between enemies. International Security 2021, 46(1): 9–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, D., Warming up to a not-so-radical idea: tort-based climate change litigation. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 2003, 28: 9–33.Google Scholar
Guha, R., Radical environmentalism: a third-world critique, in Merchant, C. (ed.), Key Concepts in Critical Theory: Ecology. Humanity Books, 1999, p. 71.Google Scholar
Gunderson, R., Fyock, C., The political economy of climate change litigation: is there a point to suing fossil fuel companies? New Political Economy 2022, 27(3): 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, N., Divestment, nonstate governance, and climate change. Law & Policy 2017, 39: 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, N., A quiet revolution: central banks, financial regulators, and climate finance. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2020, 12: 9596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, J., The watercourses convention, hydro-hegemony and transboundary water issues. The International Spectator 2016, 51(3): 118–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, T., Klimat: Russia in the Age of Climate Change. Harvard University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, K. M., Environmental discourses and biodiversity: the construction of a storyline in understanding and managing an environmental issue. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 2013, 10(1): 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol 2 – Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Hafner, M., Tagliapietra, S., de Strasser, L., Prospects for renewable energy in Africa, in Hafner, M., Tagliapietra, S., de Strasser, L. (eds.), Energy in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, 2018, pp. 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann, K., Green deal at the heart of Kenya’s green transition and resilience. European Commission (22 July 2021), https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/intpa/items/715970/en.Google Scholar
Hager, C., Green politics, expertise, and democratic discourse in the two Germanies, 1989–2019. German Politics and Society 2019, 37(4): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancher, L., Meeus, L., Nouicer, A., Reif, V. (eds.), The EU Green Deal: 2022 Edition (EUI, Technical Report 2022/06, 2022), https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/75156.Google Scholar
Harlan, T., Green development or greenwashing? A political ecology perspective on China’s green Belt and Road. Eurasian Geography and Economics 2020, 62: 202–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. M., Telling stories about climate change’ (2020) 72(3) The Professional Geographer 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, D. L., Global Physical Climatology, 2nd ed. Elsevier, 2015.Google Scholar
Hawkins, H., Kanngieser, A., Artful climate change communication: overcoming abstractions, insensibilities, and distances. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2017, 8(5): e472. doi:10.1002/wcc.472.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A., The corporation in a democratic society: in whose interest ought it and will it be run?, in Ansoff, H. I. (ed.), Business Strategy: Selected Readings. Penguin books, 1969, p. 231.Google Scholar
Heede, R., Carbon Majors: Accounting for Carbon and Methane Emissions 1854–2010, Methods and Results Report. Climate Accountability, 2014.Google Scholar
Heede, R., Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Climatic Change 2014, 122: 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heede, R., Oreskes, N., Potential emissions of CO2 and methane from proved reserves of fossil fuels: an alternative analysis. Global Environmental Change 2016, 36: 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbing, D., Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature 2013, 497(7447): 51–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henin, P., Howley, J., Keene, A., Peart, N., Innovating international investment agreements: a proposed green investment protocol for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 37–70.Google Scholar
Herdegen, M., Principles of International Economic Law, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, C., Martinez, M., Maxwell, A., Latin America at the Leaders Summit on Climate. NRDC (23 April 2021), www.nrdc.org/experts/carolina-herrera/latin-america-leaders-summit-climate.Google Scholar
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., et al., The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 2020, 146(730): 1999–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilson, C., The visibility of environmental rights in the EU legal order; eurolegalism in action? Journal of European Public Policy 2018, 25(11): 1589–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobér, K., Investment arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2010, 1(1): 153–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, B., Realizing European soft power in external cooperation and trade. Final Project Report (2021). https://respect.eui.eu/working-papers-and-reports-by-topic.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S., Gunderson, L. H., Resilience and adaptive cycles, in Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, 2002, pp. 26–52.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A.-S., Gaston-Mathé, M., Paving the way for green energy financing in the Mediterranean. DAI Global Developments (15 November 2019). https://dai-global-developments.com/articles/paving-the-way-for-green-energy-financing-in-the-mediterranean.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W., Jr., The Common Law, Dover, 1991.Google Scholar
Hon Coffin, T. M., American Courts in climate emergency. IUCN, 2019. www.iucn.org/sites/default/files/content/documents/2019/american_courts_in_climate_emergency.pdf.Google Scholar
Horster, M., Papadopoulos, K., Climate change and proxy voting in the U.S. and Europe. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, 2019. https://corpgovlaw.harvard.edu/2019/01/07/climate-change-and-proxy-voting-in-the-u-s-and-europe.Google Scholar
Hösli, A., Milieudefensie, et al. v. Shell: a tipping point in climate change litigation against corporations? Climate Law 2021, 11: 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hösli, A., Weber, R. H., Climate change reporting and due diligence: frontiers of corporate climate responsibility. European Company and Financial Law Review 2021, 18(6): 948–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hösli, A., Weber, R. H., Klimaklagen gegen Unternehmen. Internationale Entwicklungen und deren Bedeutung für die Schweiz. Jusletter 2021, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., Bang, G., Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Protocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives. European Journal of International Relations 2012, 18(1): 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A. C., Understanding and minimizing environmental impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative. Conservation Biology 2019, 33: 883–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, A. C., Lechner, A. M., Chitov, A., et al., ‘Horizon scan of the Belt and Road Initiative’, (2020) 35 Trends in Ecology and Evolution 583–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurd, C. L., Law, C. S., Bach, L. T., et al., Forensic carbon accounting: assessing the role of seaweeds for carbon sequestration. Journal of Psychology 2022, 58: 347–363.Google ScholarPubMed
IPCC, Food security, in Climate Change and Land. Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.007.Google Scholar
Itab, S., Futur Etiquetage Environnemental: le Planet-score prochainement affiché sur les produits alimentaires grâce au soutien de la société civile et à la mobilisation d’entreprises désireuses d’accélérer la transition écologique (Very Good Future, 2021). http://itab.asso.fr/downloads/affichage-environnemental/itab_sayari_vgf_-_communique_planet-score_-_20211028_vz.pdf.Google Scholar
Jakubowiak, M., Ostatni Ludzie: Wymyślanie Końca Świata. Czarne, 2021.Google Scholar
James, A., Majoritarianism. Bond Law Review 2017, 29(2): 187–196.Google Scholar
Jameson, B., Nitrous oxide, a powerful greenhouse gas, is on the rise from ocean dead zones. The Conversation (5 July 2021). https://theconversation.com.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. D., Mayfield, E. N., Farbes, J., et al., Preliminary report: the climate and energy impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. REPEAT Project, Princeton, NJ, 12 August 2022.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. D., Mayfield, E. N., Jones, R., et al., Summary report: the climate impacts of congressional infrastructure and budget bills. REPEAT Project, Princeton, NJ, 28 February 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6311986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jens, J., Wang, A., van der Leun, K., Peters, D., Buseman, M., Extending the European Hydrogen Backbone: A European Hydrogen Infrastructure Vision Covering 21 Countries (Gas for Climate 2050, 2021). https://gasforclimate2050.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/European-Hydrogen-Backbone_April-2021_V3.pdf.Google Scholar
Jirušek, M., Kuchyňková, P., The conduct of Gazprom in Central and Eastern Europe: a tool of the Kremlin, or just an adaptable player? East European Politics and Societies 2018, 32(4): 818–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffé, G., The impending water crisis in the MENA region. The International Spectator 2016, 51(3): 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Hine, D. W., Marks, A. D. G., The future is now: reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis 2017, 37(2): 331–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, C., Kneebone, J., Piebalgs, A., Cost-effective Decarbonisation Study. Florence: European University Institute, 2022.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar
Kakoulaki, G., Kougias, I., Taylor, N., et al., Green hydrogen in Europe – A regional assessment: substituting existing production with electrolysis powered by renewables. Energy Conversion and Management 2021, 228: 113649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karagianni, G.-E., A Greek Initiative for an EU Energy Crisis Solidarity Facility. 28 February 2022. https://eu-sysflex.com/a-greek-initiative-for-an-eu-energy-crisis-solidarity-facility.Google Scholar
Kardish, C., Elbrecht, J., Acworth, W., Carbon Leakage and Competitiveness: California’s Treatment of Imported Electricity and New Zealand’s Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Levy. International Carbon Action Partnership, 2021. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/carbon-leakage-and-competitiveness-californias-treatment-imported-electricity-and-new.Google Scholar
Kasraoui, S., Morocco’s Ambassador to Germany to return to Berlin this week. Morocco World News, 24 January 2022. www.moroccoworldnews.com/2022/01/346709/moroccos-ambassador-to-germany-to-return-to-berlin-this-week.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, C., National contact points and access to remedy under the UNGP – why two can make a dream so real, in Bonucci, N., Kessedjian, C. (eds.), 40 Years of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. OECD, 2018, p. 175.Google Scholar
Keating, D. EU Governments under pressure to quit Energy Charter Treaty (2019). www.forbes.com/sites/davekeating/2019/12/10/eu-governments-under-pressure-to-quit-energy-charter-treaty/#38bb572163ed.Google Scholar
Keen, M. Parry, I., Roaf, J., Border Carbon Adjustments: Rationale, Design and Impact. IMF Working Paper, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kell, G., The global compact: selected experiences and reflections. Journal of Business Ethics 2005, 59(1–2): 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H., General Theory of Norms, trans. M. Hartney. Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, L., Bypassing the ‘ratification straitjacket’: reviewing US legal participation in a climate agreement. Climate Policy 2016, 16(8): 1011–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempf, C. N., Why did so many do so little? Movement building and climate change litigation in the time of Juliana v. United States. Texas Law Review 2021, 99(5): 1005–1040.Google Scholar
Kessler, E., et al., Final evaluation: promoting low emission urban development strategies in emerging economy countries. 2016. https://smartnet.niua.org/sites/default/files/resources/Urban%20LEDS%20Final%20Evaluation%2022%20Dec%202016.pdf.Google Scholar
Kharasch, R. N., The Institutional Imperative. Charterhouse, 1973.Google Scholar
Khouri, F. J., The Jordan River controversy. The Review of Politics 1965, 27(1): 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. W., Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, updated ed. Pearson, 2010.Google Scholar
Klawitter, S., Water resources at stake: the mountain aquifer beneath the Occupied West Bank, Palestinian Territories. 2006. https://hdr.undp.org/en/content/water-resources-stake.Google Scholar
Kneebone, J., Conti, I., A first look at REPowerEU: the European Commission’s plan for energy independence from Russia. Florence: European University Institute, 2022.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, K., Is normative power cosmopolitan: rethinking European unity, norm diffusion, and international political theory. Cooperation and Conflict 2021, 56(2): 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kofman, M., Fink, A., Gorenburg, D., et al., Russian military strategy: core tenets and operational concepts. CNA Research memorandum, 2021.Google Scholar
Korteweg, R., Energy as a tool of foreign policy of authoritarian states, in particular Russia. European Parliament Paper, 2018.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., Report on the fragmentation of international law, UN Doc. A/ CN.4/L.682, 2006.Google Scholar
Kousksou, T., Allouhi, A., Belattar, M., et al. Renewable energy potential and national policy directions for sustainable development in Morocco. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015, 47: 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krakow, C. A., The international law and politics of water access: experiences of displacement, statelessness, and armed conflict. Water 2020, 12(2): 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauß, W., Bremer, S., The role of place-based narratives of change in climate risk governance. Climate Risk Management 2020, 28: 100221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krickovic, A., When interdependence produces conflict: EU–Russia energy relations as a security dilemma. Contemporary Security Policy 2015, 36(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunnas, J., Storytelling: from the early Anthropocene to the good or the bad Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review 2017, 4(2): 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuusi, T., Björklund, M., Kaitala, V., et al., Carbon border adjustment mechanisms and their economic impact on Finland and the EU. Prime Minister’s Office, Helsinki, 2020.Google Scholar
Kysar, D. A., Climate change and the International Court of Justice. Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper, 2013, pp. 16–18. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2309943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, I. R., Abdelhamid, A., Hooper, L., Food and climate change: a review of the effects of climate change on food within the remit of the Food Standards Agency. Food Standards Agency, 2010. www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/575-1-1008_X02001__Climate_Change_and_Food_Report__28_Sept_2010.pdf.Google Scholar
Lalive, J.-F., International organization and neutrality. British Yearbook of International Law 1947, 24: 72.Google Scholar
Lamy, P., Pons, G., Garzon, I., Kaufmann, L. GT8 – Domestic and international aspects of the EU CBAM: two sides of the same coin. Europe Jacques Delors, 2022. www.europejacquesdelors.eu/publications/domestic-and-international-aspects-of-the-eu-cbam.Google Scholar
Lamy, P., Pons, G., Leturcq, P., A European border carbon adjustment proposal. Renewable Energy Law & Policy Review 2020, 10(1): 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, K.-O., Westphal, K., Nord Stream 2 – A Political and Economic Contextualisation. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Research Paper, vol. 3, 2017.Google Scholar
Latour, B., An attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’. New Literary History, 2010, 41; 471–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latrech, O., Morocco reaffirms support to EU’s ‘Global Gateway’ strategy. Morocco World News, 22 June 2022. www.moroccoworldnews.com/2022/06/349853/morocco-reaffirms-support-to-eus-global-gateway-strategy.Google Scholar
Lazard, O., Russia’s Ukraine invasion and climate change go hand in hand. Commentary, Carnegie Europe, 2022.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. J., Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review 2009, 94: 1153–1234.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 2006, 77(1–2): 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Global Warming’s Six Americas. Yale University, 2016. http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/about/projects/global-warmings-sixamericas.Google Scholar
Lenton, T., Arctic tipping points. Ambio 2012, 41: 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenton, T., Held, H., Kreigler, E., et al., Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 2008, 105(6): 1786–1793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenzu, M. D., Reunión Ministerial UE–CELAC, 27 de Octubre de 2022. Consejo de La Unión Europea (27 October 2022). www.consilium.europa.eu/es/meetings/international-ministerial-meetings/2022/10/27.Google Scholar
Leonelli, G. C., Practical obstacles and structural legal constraints in the adoption of ‘defensive’ policies: comparing the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism and the US proposal for a border carbon adjustment. Legal Studies 2022, 42(4): 696–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewenstein, B. V., Models of public communication of science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, 2003. https://perma.cc/S8ZL-TPKB.Google Scholar
Lewis, P., The Earth Summit: negotiators in Rio agree to increase aid to third world. New York Times, 14 June 1992. www.nytimes.com/1992/06/14/world/the-earth-summit-negotiators-in-rio-agree-to-increase-aid-to-third-world.html.Google Scholar
Lewis, S., Madry, K., Ellis, A., COP 27-Mexico to make major climate commitment, says John Kerry. Reuters, 2 November 2022. www.reuters.com/business/cop/cop-27-mexico-make-major-climate-commitment-says-john-kerry-2022-11-02.Google Scholar
Li, M., Petersen, C. A., Tautges, N. E., Scow, K. M., Gaudin, A. C. M., Yields and resilience outcomes of organic, cover crop, and conventional practices in a Mediterranean climate. Science Reports 2019, 9: 12283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48747-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, J. Y., Wang, X., Dual circulation: a new structural economics view of development. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 2022, 20: 303–322.Google Scholar
Liu, L., China Exim says bank no longer finances new overseas coal power projects and remains committed to supporting emission reduction upgrades for completed projects. Business & Human rights Resource Centre, 2022. www.business-humanrights.org.Google Scholar
Lo, J., Japan blocks green reform of major energy investment treaty. 2020. www.climatechangenews.com/2020/09/08/japan-blocks-green-reform-major-energy-investment-treaty.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., Bradbrook, A., Energy Law and the Environment. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, J., Zadek, S., Decarbonizing the Belt and Road: a green finance roadmap. 2019. www.vivideconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/BRI_Exec_Summary_v13-screen_hi.pdf.Google Scholar
Mabey, N., McNally, R., Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: From Pollution Havens to Sustainable Development. OECD, 1999. www.oecd.org/investment/mne/2089912.pdf.Google Scholar
Macchi, C., van Zeben, J., Business and human rights implications of climate change litigation: Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell, RECIEL 2021, 30: 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, M. J., Verheyen, R., Loss, damage and responsibility after COP21: all options open for the Paris Agreement. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 2016, 25: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNeil, R., Alternative climate policy pathways in the US. Climate Policy 2013, 13(2): 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPherson, E. J., Indigenous Water Rights in Law and Regulation. Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, P., Figure of the week: foreign direct investment in Africa. Brookings Blog, 9 October 2019. www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2019/10/09/figure-of-the-week-foreign-direct-investment-in-africa.Google Scholar
Maffei, A., Grahm, S., Nuur, C., Characterisation of the impact of digitalisation on the adoption of sustainable business models in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 2019, 81: 765–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalharaes, P. C., Explaining the constitutionalization of social rights: Portuguese hypotheses and a cross-national test, in Galligan, D. J., Versteeg, M. (eds.), Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions. Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 432–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magraw, D., Chennouffi, L., Cowling, K., et al. Model green investment treaty: international investment and climate change. Journal of International Arbitration 2019, 36(1): 95–134.Google Scholar
Maher, D. T., Call, M., Santos, I. R., Sanders, C. J., Beyond burial: lateral exchange is a significant atmospheric carbon sink in mangrove forests. Biology Letters 2018, 14(7): 20180200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallet, V., Munshi, N., Pilling, D., Why Macron’s attempt to reset French ties to Africa has hit trouble. Financial Times, 27 October 2020. www.ft.com/content/cea9cdd9-c500-41bc-a2ae-2e4c01eaf2e8.Google Scholar
Mani, M., Wheeler, D., In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. Journal of Environment and Development 1998, 7(3): 215–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, D., Cust, J. F., Cecchinato, G., Stranded nations? The climate policy implications for fossil fuel-rich developing countries. OxCarre Policy Paper 34, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3264765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcu, A., Dybka, D., Status of the border carbon adjustments’ international developments. European Roundtable on Climate Change and Sustainable Transition, 2021.Google Scholar
Mares, R., Global corporate social responsibility, human rights, and the law: an interactive regulatory perspective on the voluntary–mandatory dichotomy. Transnational Legal Theory 2010, 1(2): 221–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, R., Legalizing human rights due diligence and the separation of entities principle, in Deva, S., Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours. Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 266–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, R., Corporate transparency regulations: a hollow victory? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 2018, 36(3): 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, R., Securing human rights through risk-management methods: breakthrough or misalignment? Leiden Journal of International Law 2019, 32(3): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, R., Draft UN Treaty on Business and Human Rights, in Marx, A., Van Calster, G., Wouters, J., Otteburn, K., Lica, D. (eds.), Research Handbook on Business and Human Rights. Edward Elgar, 2022, pp. 22–44.Google Scholar
Mares, R., Directors’ duties during the green transition: reasons for reform and the regulatory ecosystem approach in the EU. Nordic Journal of European Law (forthcoming 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marjanac, S., Patton, L., Extreme weather event attribution science and climate change litigation: an essential step in the causal chain? Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 2018, 36: 265–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markard, J., Rinscheid, A., Widdel, L., Analyzing transitions through the lens of discourse networks: coal phase-out in Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2021, 40: 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, E. M., Shariff, A. F., Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change 2012, 2(4): 243–247. doi:10.1038/nclimate1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlon, J. R., Bloodhart, B., Ballew, M. T., et al., How hope and doubt affect climate change mobilization, Frontiers in Communication 2019, 4(20).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marossi, A. Z., Bassett, M. R. (eds.), Economic Sanctions under International Law: Unilateralism, Multilateralism, Legitimacy, and Consequences. TMC Asser Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschütz, B., Bremer, S., Runhaar, H., et al., Local narratives of change as an entry point for building urban climate resilience. Climate Risk Management 2020, 28: 100223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, J., Puertas, R., Martín, J. M. M., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., Innovation and environmental policies aimed at achieving sustainable production. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2022, 32: 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, M., Zeitoun, M., El Sheikh, R., Conflict and social vulnerability to climate change: lessons from Gaza. Climate and Development 2011, 3(4): 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. OECD Library, 2021.Google Scholar
Mbow, C., et al., Food security, in Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. (eds.), Climate Change and Land. Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 437–550. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.007.Google Scholar
Matalucci, S., Elmed Interconnector aims to bring solar power from the Sahara to Europe. Deutsche Welle, 24 May 2019. www.dw.com/en/elmed-interconnector-aims-to-bring-solar-power-from-the-sahara-to-europe/a-48843725.Google Scholar
May, J. R., The case for environmental human rights: recognition, implementation, and outcomes. Cordozo Law Review 2021, 42(3): 983–1037.Google Scholar
May, N., Neuhoff, K., New technologies on the supply side, in Glachant, J.-M., Joskow, P., Pollitt, M. (eds.), Handbook on Electricity Markets. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, p. 332.Google Scholar
Mayer, B., The relevance of the no-harm principle to climate change law and politics. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law 2016, 19: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, B. Obligations of conduct in the international law on climate change: a defence. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 2018, 27:130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, B., Temperature targets and state obligations on the mitigation of climate change. Journal of Environmental Law 2021, 33(3): 585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, B., The duty of care of fossil-fuel producers for climate change mitigation. Transnational Environmental Law 2022, 11(2): 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, B., Rajavuori, M., National fossil fuel companies and climate change mitigation under international law. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 2016, 44: 55.Google Scholar
McLure, C. E., Jr., The GATT—legality of border adjustments for carbon taxes and the cost of emissions permits: a riddle wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. Florida Tax Review 2011, 11(4): 221–294.Google Scholar
McNamara, K. E., Westoby, R., Solastalgia and the gendered nature of climate change: an example from Erub Island, Torres Strait. EcoHealth 2021, 8(2): 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeus, L., Batlle, C., Glachant, J.-M., et al., The 5th EU Electricity Market Reform: A Renewable Jackpot for All Europeans Package? Florence: European University Institute, 2022.Google Scholar
Megbowon, E., Mlambo, C., Adekunle, B., Impact of China’s outward FDI on sub-Saharan Africa’s industrialization: evidence from 26 countries. Cogent Economics & Finance 2019, 7(1): 1681054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meguro, M., State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation. The American Journal of International Law 2020, 114(4): 729–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehling, M. A., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., Verkuijl, C., Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action. American Journal of International Law 2019, 113(3): 433–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meidinger, E. E., ‘Private’ environmental regulation, human rights, and community. Buffalo Environmental Law Journal Spring 2000, 7: 123–238.Google Scholar
Meijnders, A. L., Midden, C. J. H., Wilke, H. A. M., Role of negative emotion in communication about CO2 risks. Risk Analysis 2001, 21(5): 955–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melhem, A., New Chapter Begins in Israel–Palestine Water Dispute. Al-Monitor, 2017. www.al-monitor.com/originals/2017/06/palestine-israel-joint-water-committee-dispute-meeting.html.Google Scholar
Merino, Á., La población joven en el mundo. El Orden Mundial (September 14, 2020). https://elordenmundial.com/mapas-y-graficos/poblacion-joven-mundo.Google Scholar
Merryman, J. H., Perez-Perdomo, R., The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miche, D., Computers that learn could lead to disaster. New Scientist 1980, 160.Google Scholar
Mildenberger, M., Development of climate institutions in the United States. Environmental Politics 2021, 30(1–2): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mile, A., Emerging legal doctrines in climate change law: seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice. Texas International Law Journal 2021, 56: 59–94.Google Scholar
Mills, R., A fine balance: the geopolitics of the global energy transition in MENA, in Hafner, M., Tagliapietra, S. (eds.), The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition. Cham: Springer International Publishing, vol. 73, 2020, 115–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minasny, B., Malone, B. P., McBratney, A. B., et al., Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 2017, 292: 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnerop, P., Otto, F. E. L., ‘Climate change and causation: joining law and climate science on the basis of formal logic. Buffalo Journal of Environmental Law 2020, 27(1): 49–86.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. D., Sheargold, E., Principles of International Trade and Investment Law. Edward Elgar, 2022.Google Scholar
Mitrova, T., Arctic resource development: economics and politics, in Corell, R. W., Kim, J. D., Kim, Y. H., et al. (eds.), The Arctic in World Affairs: A North Pacific Dialogue on Global-Arctic Interactions: The Arctic Moves from Periphery to Center. Korea Maritime Institute and East–West Center, 2019, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
Moezzi, M., Janda, K. B., Rotmann, S., Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research. Energy Research & Social Science 2017, 31: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, A., Aboubakr, E., El Massaoui, H., El Markhi, H., Renewable energy potential and available capacity for wind and solar power in Morocco towards 2030. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 2018, 11(1): 189–198.Google Scholar
Molina, C., Sánchez anuncia una cumbre entre la Unión Europea y América Latina para 2023. Público, 24 August 2022. www.publico.es/politica/sanchez-anuncia-cumbre-union-europea-y-america-latina-2023.html.Google Scholar
Möllers, C., The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers. Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondejar, M. E., Avtar, R., Diaz, H. L. B., et al., Digitalization to achieve sustainable development goals: steps towards a smart green planet. Science of the Total Environment 2021, 794: 1483539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., Waterworld: climate change, statehood, and the right to self-determination, in Quirico, O., Boumghar, M. (eds.), Climate Change and Human Rights. An International and Comparative Law Perspective. Routledge, 2016, p. 104.Google Scholar
Mora Díaz, D., Cambio climático: América Latina será una de las regiones más afectadas. Noticias ONU, 17 August 2021. https://news.un.org/es/story/2021/08/1495582.Google Scholar
Morena, E., Krause, D., Stevis, D. (eds), Just Transitions, Social Justice in the Shift Towards a Low-Carbon World. Pluto Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Morgera, E., Corporate Environmental Accountability in International Law, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Morrow, J., Mixed government, balanced constitutions and the separation of powers, in History of Political Thought. Palgrave, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mörsdorf, G., A simple fix for carbon leakage? Assessing the environmental effectiveness of the EU carbon border adjustment. Energy Policy 2022, 161: 112596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, T., Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Morton, T., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D., Bretschneider, P., The future that may (or may not) come: how framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21(1): 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S. C., Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Climate Change 2010, 1(1): 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchlinski, P. M., ‘Global Bukowina’ examined: viewing the multinational enterprise as a transnational law-making community, in Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law Without a State. Dartmouth, 1997, pp. 79–106.Google Scholar
Muench, S., Stoermer, E., Jensen, K., et al., Towards a Green and Digital Future: Key Requirements for Successful Twin Transitions in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union, 2022.Google Scholar
Murray, J., Which countries have committed to legally binding net zero carbon emissions? NS Energy, 2021. www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/countries-net-zero-emissions.Google Scholar
Myllyvirta, L., Analysis: China’s New 2030 targets promise more low-carbon power than meets the eye. Carbon Brief, 15 December 2020. www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-chinas-new-2030-targets-promise-more-low-carbon-power-than-meets-the-eye.Google Scholar
Nagle, M. K., Tracing the origins of fairly traceable: the black hole of private climate change litigation. Tulane Law Review 2010, 85: 477–518.Google Scholar
Najib, M., Palestine runs dry: ‘Our water they steal and sell to us’. 2021. www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/7/15/water-war-palestinians-demand-more-water-access-from-israel.Google Scholar
Nasr, H., Neef, A., Ethiopia’s challenge to Egyptian hegemony in the Nile River Basin: the case of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Geopolitics 2016, 21(4): 969–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, B., Chafetz, E., Electricity as a good or a service: some shocking developments. Business Credit, 2013.Google Scholar
Nedopil, C., Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Shanghai, Green Finance & Development Center, FISF Fudan University, 2022. https://greenfdc.org/countries-of-the-belt-and-road-initiative-bri.Google Scholar
Nedopil, C., Green finance for soft power: an analysis of China’s green policy signals and investments in the Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Policy and Governance 2022, 32(2): 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedopil, C., De Boer, D., Fan, D., Understanding China’s latest guidelines for greening the Belt and Road. China Dialogue, 2022. https://chinadialogue.net/en/business/understanding-chinas-latest-guidelines-for-greening-the-belt-and-road.Google Scholar
Nerets, V., Kazāks, A., Concerns about investment protection in Russia during its invasion of Ukraine. 18 March 2022. www.sorainen.com/publications/concerns-about-investment-protection-in-russia-during-its-invasion-of-ukraine.Google Scholar
Nissen, A., Not that assertive: the EU’s take on enforcement of labour obligations in its free trade agreement with South Korea. European Journal of International Law EJIL 2022, 33(2): 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, R., Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Nixon, R., The Great Acceleration and the Great Divergence: vulnerability in the Anthropocene. Profession 2014, 14.Google Scholar
Noussan, M., Raimondi, P. P., Scita, R., Hafner, M., The role of green and blue hydrogen in the energy transition – a technological and geopolitical perspective. Sustainability 2020, 13(1): 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, S., The role of courts in remedying climate chaos: transcending judicial nihilism and taking survival seriously. Georgetown Environmental Law Review 2020, 32(4): 743–778.Google Scholar
Nurton, J., Patenting trends in renewable energy. World Intellectual Property Organization Magazine, March 2020. www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2020/01/article_0008.html.Google Scholar
Nyabiage, J., Why is China looking beyond Africa for oil supplies? South China Morning Post, (5 September 2020). www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3100367/why-china-looking-beyond-africa-oil-supplies.Google Scholar
Nyabiage, J., Guinea coup adds to growing knots in China’s belt and road plans. South China Morning Post, 12 September 2021. www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3148473/guinea-coup-adds-growing-knots-chinas-belt-and-road-plans.Google Scholar
Oates, T., Carbon border adjustment methods. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2022, 20(4):206.Google Scholar
O’Neill, S., Nicholson-Cole, S., ‘Fear won’t do it’: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication 2009, 30(3): 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orfield, L. B., The Growth of Scandinavian Law. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Osaka, S., Why the Climate Bill’s impact might not match what many expect: models could be over- (or under-!) estimating the climate impact of the Inflation Reduction Act. Washington Post, 12 August 2022.Google Scholar
Osofsky, H. M., The geography of climate change litigation: implications for transnational regulatory governance. Washington University Law Quarterly 2005, 83: 1789–1855.Google Scholar
Oud, M., Drinhausen, K. (eds.), The Decoding China Dictionary (2021). https://decodingchina.eu/download/decoding-china.Google Scholar
Ozai, I., Designing an equitable border carbon adjustment mechanism. Canadian Tax Journal 2022, 70(1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Park, S., The politics of 21st century environmental disasters. Environmental Politics 2022, 31(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J., Climate change, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I. (eds.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2016, p. 1009.Google Scholar
Peel, J., Lin, J., Transnational climate litigation: the contribution of the Global South. The American Journal of International Law 2019, 113(4): 679–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J., Osofsky, H. M., Climate Change Litigation: Regulatory Pathways to Cleaner Energy. Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J., Osofsky, H. M., Climate change litigation. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 2020, 16: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, M. S., Critical commentary on the Energy Charter Treaty. European Energy Journal 2018, 7(4): 47–54.Google Scholar
Pirani, S., Stern, J., Yafimava, K., The Russo-Ukrainian gas dispute of January 2009: a comprehensive assessment. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirlot, A., Carbon border adjustment measures: a straightforward multi-purpose climate change instrument? Journal of Environmental Law 2022, 34(1): 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumwood, V., Animals and Ecology: Towards a Better Integration. Working/technical paper, Australian National University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41767.Google Scholar
Plumwood, V., Ecosocial feminism as a general theory of oppression, in Merchant, C. (ed.), Key Concepts in Critical Theory: Ecology. Humanity Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Polak, P., Polakova, B., Changes in the EU’s geopolitical position and energy doctrine in light of the Ukraine invasion. Society 2022, 59: 254–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pompili, B., Le Maire, B., Dussopt, O., Le Budget Vert: La France est le premier pays au monde à mesurer l’impact du budget de l’Etat sur l’environnement. Press Release No. 219, Ministère de l’Économie et des Finances, 30 September 2020.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., Kramer, M., Serafeim, G., Where ESG fails. Institutional Investor, 16 October 2019.Google Scholar
Porterfeld, M. C., Reforming the International Investment Regime through a Framework Convention on Investment and Sustainable Development. 2020. https://uncitral.un.org.Google Scholar
Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D. C., Tignor, M., et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Pressman, J., Wildavsky, A., Implementation. University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Prest, J., Woodyatt, J., Pettit, J., Comparing the hydrogen strategies of the EU, Germany, and Australia: legal and policy issues. Oil Gas & Energy Law Intelligence 2021, 19(2): paper no. 21.Google Scholar
Preston, B. J., The influence of climate change litigation on governments and the private sector. Climate Law 2011, 2: 485–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirico, O., Towards a peremptory duty to curb greenhouse gas emissions? Fordham International Law Journal 2021, 44: 923–965.Google Scholar
Rached, E., Brooks, D. B., Water governance in the Middle East and North Africa: an unfinished agenda. International Journal of Water Resources Development 2010, 26(2): 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajamani, L., International Climate Change Law. Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Rajavuori, M., The role of non-state actors in climate law, in Mayer, B., Zahar, A. (eds.), Debating Climate Law. Cambridge University Press, 2021, p. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapier, R., The World’s Top Lithium Producers. Forbes, 13 December 2020. www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2020/12/13/the-worlds-top-lithium-producers.Google Scholar
Razavi, K., Have We Improved the Way We Talk about Climate Change? 2019. https://opencanada.org/have-we-improved-way-we-talk-about-climate-change.Google Scholar
Readfearn, G. et al., Inside Australia’s climate emergency: the new fire zone. The Guardian, 12 February 2020. www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2020/feb/12/living-in-the-climate-emergency-australias-new-fire-zone.Google Scholar
Rees, J., Development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law and Policy 1997, 19(4): 477–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, R., Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few. Alfred Knopf, 2015.Google Scholar
Restrepo, T., Modification of renewable energy support schemes under the energy Charter Treaty: Eiser and Charanne in the context of climate change. Goettingen Journal of International Law 2018, 8(1): 101–137.Google Scholar
Rhodes, E. L., Environmental Justice in America: A New Paradigm. Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rice, J. L., Burke, B. J., Heynen, N., Knowing climate change, embodying climate praxis: Experiential knowledge in southern Appalachia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2015, 105(2): 253–262. doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.985628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riegert, B., EU will mit Chinas “Neuer Seidenstraße” konkurrieren. Deutsche Welle, 1 December 2021. www.dw.com/de/eu-will-mit-chinas-neuer-seidenstra%C3%9Fe-konkurrieren/a-59980143.Google Scholar
Rieu-Clarke, A., Moynihan, R., Magsig, B.-O., Transboundary Water Governance and Climate Change Adaptation: International Law, Policy Guidelines and Best Practice Application. United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2015, p. 35.Google Scholar
Ritchie, H., Roser, M., Russia: CO2 country profile. 2022. https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/russia.Google Scholar
Robert, S., Un mécanisme d’ajustement carbone aux frontières compatible avec le droit de l’OMC: une gageure. European Papers 2022, 7(1): 239–252.Google Scholar
Robinson, O. F., Fergus, T. D., Gordon, W. M., European Legal History. Butterworths, 1994.Google Scholar
Roeser, S., Emotional engineers: toward morally responsible engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 2012, 18(1): 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeser, S., Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions. Risk Analysis 2012, 32(6): 1033–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roger, C., Bellienathan, S., Africa in the global climate change negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2016, 16: 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronzitti, N., Italy’s non-belligerency during the Iraqi War, in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today. Brill, 2005, p. 198.Google Scholar
Rosales, O., La convergencia entre Alianza del Pacífico y MERCOSUR: potencial y conflictos. Real Instituto Elcano, 6 February 2020. www.realinstitutoelcano.org/documento-de-trabajo/la-convergencia-entre-alianza-del-pacifico-y-mercosur-potencial-y-conflictos.Google Scholar
Rose, D. B., van Dooren, T., Chrulew, M., Cooke, S., Kearnes, M., O’Gorman, E., Thinking through the environment, unsettling the humanities. Environmental Humanities 2012, 1(1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. C., Mukherjee, N., Simmons, B. I., et al., Policy windows for the environment: tips for improving the uptake of scientific knowledge. Environmental Science & Policy 2020, 113: 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, B., Davis, W., Marketing risks: the mindless acceptance of risks is promoted by emotional appeals, in Roeser, S. (ed.), Emotions and Risky Technologies. Springer, 2010, p. 61.Google Scholar
Rossetto, N., Reif, V., Digitalization of the electricity infrastructure: a key enabler for the decarbonization and decentralization of the power sector, in Montero, J., Finger, M. (eds.), A Modern Guide to the Digitalization of Infrastructure. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.Google Scholar
Roszak, T., The Cult of Information. Pantheon, 1986.Google Scholar
Roudi-Fahimi, F., Creel, L., De Souza, R.-M., Finding the Balance: Population and Water Scarcity in the Middle East and North Africa. Population Resource Bureau, 2000.Google Scholar
Roy, S., Woerdman, E., Situating Urgenda v the Netherlands within comparative climate change litigation. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 2016, 34(2): 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J., Response to Misereor. Global Policy Forum, 2008. https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/files/reports-and-materials/Ruggie-response-to-Misereor-GPF-2-Jun-2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J., Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. Northon, 2013.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G., Life in the Global Public Domain: Response to Commentaries on the UN Guiding Principles and the Proposed Treaty on Business and Human Rights. 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J., The Paradox of Corporate Globalization: Disembedding and Reembedding Governing Norms. M-RCBG Faculty Working Paper Series, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J., Middleton, E., Money, millennials and human rights: sustaining ‘sustainable investing’. Global Policy 2019, 10(1): 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russian invasion of Ukraine encourages energy transition, self-sufficiency. Oil and Energy Trends 2022, 47(4): 10–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryzhenkov, A., Burinova, L., Current issues of using digital technologies for environmental protection: legal aspect. SHS Web of Conferences 2021, 109: 01033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, C. F., Victor, D. G., Fixing the Climate: Strategies for an Uncertain World. Princeton University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Saleh, H., Abboud, L., Spying Allegations Strain Morocco’s Ties with France. Financial Times, 25 July 2021. www.ft.com/content/38d2cae9-4aa2-4da0-805e-a71b7c72ab7a.Google Scholar
Salem, H. S., Geopolitical challenges, complexities, and future uncertainties in the Occupied Palestinian Territories: land and population’s perspectives. New Middle Eastern Studies 2020, 10(1): 45–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salem, H. S., Yihdego, Z., Muhammed, H. H., The status of freshwater and reused treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Journal of Water and Health 2021, 19(1): 120–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salman, S. M. A., The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam: the road to the Declaration of Principles and the Khartoum Document. Water International 2016, 41(4): 512–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salman, S. M. A., Agreement on the Declaration of Principles on the GERD: levelling the Nile Basin playing field, in The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and the Nile Basin: Implications for Transboundary Water Cooperation. Taylor & Francis Group, 2017, p. 65.Google Scholar
Samaniego, J. L., Panorama de las actualizaciones de las contribuciones determinadas a nivel nacional de cara a la COP 26. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. 2022.Google Scholar
Sambhi, N., Military Coup Could Cruel China’s Plans for Mining in Guinea. ASPI Strategist, 16 September 2016. www.aspistrategist.org.au/military-coup-could-cruel-chinas-plans-for-mining-in-guinea.Google Scholar
Sands, P., Climate change and the rule of law: adjudicating the future in international law. Journal of Environmental Law 2016, 28(1): 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, A., The European Union’s Carbon Border Mechanism and the WTO. 2021. www.bruegel.org/blog-post/european-unions-carbon-border-mechanism-and-wto.Google Scholar
Sareen, S., Haarstad, H. Digitalization as a driver of transformative environmental innovation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2021, 41: 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarsak, R., Almasri, M. N., Health of Palestinians, water and coastal aquifer in Gaza – authors’ reply. The Lancet 2014, 383(9924): 1207–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauer, N., Russia Readies to Ratify Paris Agreement, Warns about Renewables ‘Absolutism’. 10 July 2019. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/russia-readies-to-ratify-paris-agreement-warns-about-renewables-absolutism.Google Scholar
Savaresi, A., Inter-state climate change litigation: ‘Neither a chimera nor a panacea’, in Alogna, I., Bakker, C., Gauci, J.-P. (eds.), Climate Change Litigation. Brill, Nijhoff, 2021, p. 366.Google Scholar
Savaresi, A., The UN HRC recognizes the right to a healthy environment and appoints a new Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Climate Change. What does it all mean? EJIL:Talk! 12 October 2021. www.ejiltalk.org/the-un-hrc-recognizes-the-right-to-a-healthy-environment-and-appoints-a-new-special-rapporteur-on-human-rights-and-climate-change-what-does-it-all-mean.Google Scholar
Sayigh, Y., Arafat and the anatomy of a revolt. Survival 2001, 43(3): 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, M. Baarsch, F., Balo, G., et al., Africa’s Adaptation Gap 2: Technical Report. UNEP, 2014. https://climateanalytics.org/media/africa_adaptation_gap_2014_1.pdf.Google Scholar
Schechter, P., Cortiñas, J., Will Latin America Listen to Climate Change Warnings? BRINK – Conversations and Insights on Global Business, 6 September 2021. www.brinknews.com/will-latin-america-listen-to-the-climate-change-warnings.Google Scholar
Scheffer, M., Critical Transitions in Nature and Society. Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiermeier, Q., The Kyoto Protocol: hot air. Nature 2012, 491(7426): 656–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, E., Victim Status before the ECtHR in Cases of Alleged Omissions: The Swiss Climate Case. EJIL:Talk! 2022. www.ejiltalk.org/victim-status-before-the-ecthr-in-cases-of-alleged-omissions-the-swiss-climate-case.Google Scholar
Scholte, J. A., Multistakeholderism Filling the Global Governance Gap? Research Overview. Global Challenges Foundation, 2020. https://globalchallenges.org/wp-content/uploads/Research-review-global-multistakeholderism-scholte-2020.04.06.pdf.Google Scholar
Schreiber, M., Pressionado, Bolsonaro promete na Cúpula do Clima dobrar recursos para repressão ao desmatamento. BBC News Brasil, 22 April 2021. www.bbc.com/portuguese/internacional-56848474.Google Scholar
Scott, F. D., Sweden: The Nation’s History. Southern Illinois University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Scott, K. N., Mind the gap: marine geoengineering and the Law of the Sea, in Beckman, R. C., McCreath, M., Roach, J. A., Sun, Z., High Seas Governance. Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Scully, T., The development of the Antarctic Treaty System, in Berkman, P. A., Lang, M. A., Walton, D. W. H., Oran, R. (eds.), Science Diplomacy: Antarctica, Science, and the Governance of International Spaces. Smithsonian, 2011, p. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores, Gobierno de México, La presidencia pro tempore de México en la CELAC. 27 December 2021.Google Scholar
Selby, J., Dressing up domination as ‘cooperation’: the case of Israeli–Palestinian water relations. Review of International Studies 2003, 29(1): 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selin, N. E., Carbon sequestration, in Encyclopedia Britannica (16 January 2019). www.britannica.com/technology/carbon-sequestration.Google Scholar
Sengstschmid, H., Sprong, N., Schmid, O., et al., EU Ecolabel for Food and Feed Products – Feasibility Study. European Commission, 20 October 2011. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/documents/Ecolabel_for_food_final_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Sengupta, S., What the US Climate Law Means for the World. New York Times, 19 August 2022.Google Scholar
Senn, P. R., Why has the German Civil Code proven so durable? European Journal of Law and Economics 1999, 7(1): 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serreze, M. C., Brave New Arctic: The Untold Story of the Melting North. Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., et al., Carbon lock-in: types, causes, and policy implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2016, 41: 425–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setzer, J., Byrnes, R., Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2020 Snapshot. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2020.Google Scholar
Setzer, J., Higham, C., Global Trends in Climate Litigation: 2021 Snapshot. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2021.Google Scholar
Setzer, J., Higham, C., Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2022 Snapshot. Policy report, LSE, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, 2022. www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation-2022-snapshot.pdf.Google Scholar
Setzer, J., Vanhala, L. C., Climate change litigation: a review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2019, 10: e580.Google Scholar
Shepherd, C., China Turns Its Back on Bangladesh BRI Coal Projects. Financial Times, 2021.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A., The distinction between lawful and unlawful expropriation, in Ribeiro, C. (ed.), Investment Arbitration and The Energy Charter Treaty. Juris, 2006, pp. 169–199.Google Scholar
Sheppard, S. R. J. Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science & Policy 2005, 8(6): 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, D. H., Africa, China, the United States, and oil. Center for Strategic & International Studies, 8 May 2007. www.csis.org/analysis/africa-china-united-states-and-oil.Google Scholar
Shukla, P. R., Skea, J., Slade, R., et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, 2022.Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, U., Sarmiento, J.L., Atmospheric carbon dioxide and the ocean. Nature 1993, 365: 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva Barros, P., Brasil: un extraño en su propio continente – Latinoamérica 21. Latinoamérica 21, 18 September 2021. https://latinoamerica21.com/es/brasil-un-extrano-en-su-propio-continente.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A., The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Sinclair, D., Self-regulation versus command and control – beyond false dichotomies. Law & Policy 1997, 19(4): 529–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smieszek, M., Informal International Regimes: A Case Study of the Arctic Council. University of Lapland, 2019.Google Scholar
Smil, V., Grand Transitions: How the Modern World Was Made. Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Smith, D. C., ‘No ordinary lawsuit’: will Juliana v United States put the judiciary at the centre of US climate change policy? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 2018, 36(3): 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Bright, C., McCorquodale, R., et al., Study on Due Diligence Requirements through the Supply Chain – Final Report. European Commission, 2020.Google Scholar
Solana, J., Climate breakdown litigation in financial systems: a typology. Transnational Environmental Law 2020, 9(1): 103–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., Diversity: energy studies need social science. Nature 2014, 511(7511): 529–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis 2012, 32(6): 957–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spier, J., The ‘strongest’ climate ruling yet: the Dutch Supreme Court’s Urgenda judgment. Netherlands International Law Review 2020, 67: 319–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanway, D., Brock, J., China’s Overseas Coal Power Retreat Could Wipe Out $50 Billion of Investment. Reuters, 22 September 2021. www.msn.com/en-za/news/world/china-s-overseas-coal-power-retreat-could-wipe-out-50-billion-of-investment/ar-AAOGPtH.Google Scholar
Stavins, R. N., What can we learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 allowance trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1998, 23(3): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterk, W., Watanabe, R., Ott, H. E., Wittnebem, B., The Nairobi Climate Change Summit (COP 12 – MOP 2): taking a deep breath before negotiating post-2012 targets? Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 2007, 4(2): 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, L., Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States. Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, O. S., Østhagen, A., Raspotnik, A. (eds.), Marine Resources: Climate Change, and International Management Regimes. I.B. Tauris, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. P., The Changing Arctic Environment: The Arctic Messenger. Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stones, J., Hamilton, J., Renewable PPAs and a Review of the Commodity Price Spike on Renewable Hydrogen Production Costs. 2022. https://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com.Google Scholar
Strauss, A., Climate change litigation: opening the door to the International Court of Justice, in Burns, W. C. G., Osofsky, H. M. (eds.), Adjudicating Climate Change: State, National, and International Approaches. Cambridge University Press, 2009, p. 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, A. L., Cullen, J. J., Chisholm, S. W., Ocean fertilization: science, policy, and commerce. Oceanography 2009, 22(3): 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strydom, H. A., Some perspectives on global governance, judicial review and climate change, in Ruppel, O. C., Roschmann, C., Ruppel-Schlichting, K. (eds.), Climate Change: International Law and Global Governance. Nomos, 2013, p. 687.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, R. F., Otto, F. E. L., Saad, A. I., et al., Filling the evidentiary gap in climate litigation. Nature Climate Change 2021, 11: 651–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, , The Climate Opportunity: Getting ahead of Latin America’s Net-Zero Transition. JP Morgan Insights, 15 April 2022. https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/gl/en/insights/investing/the-climate-opportunity-getting-ahead-of-latin-americas-net-zero-transition.Google Scholar
Suh, J., Carbon border adjustment: a unilateral solution to the multilateral problem? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2022, 22: 715–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suldovsky, B., The Information Deficit Model and Climate Change Communication. Climate Science, September 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., Moral heuristics and risk, in Roeser, S. (ed.), Emotions and Risky Technologies. Springer, 2010, pp. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, A., The Nile River Basin Initiative: too many cooks, too little broth. SAIS Review 2003, 22(2): 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, A., Challenges for water sharing in the Nile Basin: changing geo-politics and changing climate. Hydrological Sciences Journal 2011, 56(4): 687–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliapietra, S., Zachmann, G., Towards a zero-carbon and digital energy system: what policy challenges for Europe? European Energy Journal 2018, 7: 16–32.Google Scholar
Taglioni, A., Lula y AMLO acordaron potenciar la Celac y construir una agenda regional en el G20. La Política Online, 3 March 2022. www.lapoliticaonline.com/mexico/internacionales-mx/lula-y-amlo-acordaron-potenciar-la-cela-y-construir-una-agenda-regional-en-el-g20.Google Scholar
Tawfik, R., Revisiting Hydro-Hegemony from a Benefit-Sharing Perspective: The Case of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Discussion Paper 5/2015, 2015.Google Scholar
Tayeebwa, W., Wendo, C., Nakiwala, A. S., Theories and models of science communication, in Wendo, C. (ed.), Science Communication Skills for Journalists: A Resource Book for Universities in Africa. CABI, 2022, pp. 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teffera, B., Assefa, B., Assefa, G., Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of hydroelectric generation in Ethiopia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2020, 41: 100795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teshome, R. G., The Draft Convention on the Right to Development: a new dawn to the recognition of the right to development as a human right? Human Rights Law Review 2022, 22(2): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, F., The absurdity of relying on human rights law to go after emitters, in Mayer, B., Zahar, A. (eds.), Debating Climate Law. Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tienhaara, K., Downie, C., Risky business? The Energy Charter Treaty, renewable energy, and investor–state disputes. Global Governance 2018, 24(3): 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmerberg, S., Kaltschmitt, M., Hydrogen from renewables: supply from North Africa to Central Europe as blend in existing pipelines – potentials and costs. Applied Energy 2019, 237: 795–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiseo, I., Largest emitters of CO2 worldwide 2020. Statista, 27 July 2022. www.statista.com/statistics/271748/the-largest-emitters-of-co2-in-the-world.Google Scholar
Toure, S., Acquah, P. (eds.), History of the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment: 1985–2005. AMCEN, 2005. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/8876/AMCEN_History.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
Trewin, B., Adam, J.-P., Alvar-Beltrán, J., et al, State of the Climate in Africa 2019. WMO-No. 1253. World Meteorological Organisation, 2020. https://library.wmo.int/records/item/57196-state-of-the-climate-in-africa-2019?offset=.Google Scholar
Trouwborst, A., The precautionary principle and the ecosystem approach in international law: differences, similarities and linkages. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 2009, 18: 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschakert, P., Barnett, J., Ellis, N., et al., Climate change and loss, as if people mattered: values, places, and experiences. WIREs Climate Change 2017, 8(5): e476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsikudo, K. A., Soft powering the China water machine: the Bui Dam and China–Ghana relations. Canadian Journal of African Studies 2021, 56(2): 319–339.Google Scholar
Tuda, A., Omar, M., Protection of marine areas in Kenya. The George Wright Forum 2012, 29(1): 43–50.Google Scholar
Tun, A. H., Myanmar Shelves $3.6 Billion Mega Dam, Officials Say. Reuters. www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-dam-idUSTRE78T10H20110930.Google Scholar
Turetsky, M. R., Abbott, B. W., Jones, M. C., et al., Permafrost collapse is accelerating carbon release. Nature 2019, 569: 32–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tynkkynen, V-P., The Energy of Russia: Hydrocarbon Culture and Climate Change. Edward Elgar, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagts, D. F., Rebus revisited: changed circumstances in treaty law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 2005, 43(2): 459–475.Google Scholar
Vakulenko, S., Shots Fired: Is an EU–Russia Energy War Inevitable? 2022. https://carnegieendowment.org/eurasiainsight/87160.Google Scholar
Van Caenegem, R. C., Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History. Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Leeuw, S., The role of narratives in human–environmental relations: an essay on elaborating win–win solutions to climate change and sustainability. Climatic Change 2020, 160: 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geelen, T., The Paris Agreement’s white whale: the hunt for greater ambition on shipping emission. ILA Reporter, 2 September 2021. https://ilareporter.org.au/2021/09/the-paris-agreements-white-whale-the-hunt-for-greater-ambition-on-shipping-emissions-tess-van-geelen.Google Scholar
Van Wijk, A., Wouters, F., Hydrogen – the bridge between Africa and Europe, in Weijnen, M. P. C., Lukszo, Z., Farahani, S. (eds.), Shaping an Inclusive Energy Transition. Springer, 2021, p. 98.Google Scholar
Van Zeben, J., Establishing a governmental duty of care for climate change mitigation: will Urgenda turn the tide? Transnational Environmental Law 2015, 4(2): 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenbergh, M. P., ‘Reconceptualizing the future of environmental law: the role of private climate governance. Pace Environmental Law Review 2015, 32: 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderZwaag, D. L., Ocean dumping and fertilization in the Antarctic: tangled legal currents, sea of challenges, in Berkman, P. A., Lang, M. A., Walton, D. W. H., Oran, R. (eds.), Science Diplomacy: Antarctica, Science, and the Governance of International Spaces. Smithsonian, 2011, pp. 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varis, O., Tortajada, C., Water Governance in the Mena Region: Policies and Institutions. Policy Brief, Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, 2009.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, J., EU Electricity Reform. NEWES, 2022.Google Scholar
Vaughan, A., The first global energy crisis. New Scientist 2022, 253(3379): 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velut, J. B., Breinbauer, D. B., de Bruijne, M., et al., Comparative analysis of trade and sustainable development provisions in free trade agreements. LSE, February 2022.Google Scholar
Verburg, C., Modernising the Energy Charter Treaty: an opportunity to enhance legal certainty in investor–state dispute settlement. Journal of World Investment and Trade 2019, 20(2–3), 425–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verde, S. F., Acworth, W., Kardish, C., Borghesis, S., Achieving zero emissions under a cap-and-trade system. Policy Brief 2020/26. EUI, 2020. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/67510.Google Scholar
Vidal, J., Tuckman, J., Cancún Climate Summit: Rich Accused of ‘Holding Humanity Hostage’. The Guardian, 26 November 2010. www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/nov/26/cancun-climate-summit-humantiy-hostage.Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C., Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, 2nd ed. Liberty Fund, 2012.Google Scholar
Vogel, D., The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Brookings Institution Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Voigt, C., State responsibility for climate change damages. Nordic Journal of International Law 2008, 77(1–2): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, C., The Paris Agreement: what is the standard of conduct for parties? Questions of International Law 2016, 26: 17–28.Google Scholar
Von der Leyen, U., Remarks by President von der Leyen at the joint press statement with Moussa Faki, Chairperson of the African Union Commission. Speech, African Union, 7 December 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_19_6697.Google Scholar
Von der Leyen, U., Earth Day Speech at the Global Leaders Summit, 22 April 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_21_1882.Google Scholar
Wadhams, P., A Farewell to Ice: A Report from the Arctic. Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Wälde, T., Contract claims under the Energy Charter Treaty’s umbrella clause: original intentions versus emerging jurisprudence, in Ribeiro, C. (ed.), Investment Arbitration and the Energy Charter Treaty. Jurisnet, 2006, p. 205.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. M, Hobbs, P. V., Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey, 2nd ed. Academic Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wang, C. N., China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Investment Report H1 2021. 2021. https://greenfdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21_07_22_BRI-Investment-Report-H1-2021.pdf.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Huang, X., Zhao, X., et al., Key global climate governance problems and Chinese countermeasures. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment 2021, 19(2): 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wannier, G. E., Gerrard, M. B., Disappearing states: harnessing international law to preserve cultures and society, in Ruppel, O. C., Roschmann, C., Ruppel-Schlichting, K. (eds.), Climate Change: International Law and Global Governance. Nomos, 2013, pp. 615–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasilewski, P., Moscow says no decision yet on Lithuania oil link. Reuters, 12 April 2007. www.reuters.com/article/russia-lithuania-refinery-idUKL1231819920070412.Google Scholar
Watson, A., The Making of the Civil Law. Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. H., Kysar, D. A., Courting disaster: climate change and the adjudication of catastrophe. Notre Dame Law Review 2017, 93(1): 295.Google Scholar
Weber, E. U., Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change 2006, 77(1–2): 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. H., Hösli, A., Climate change liability: comparing risks for directors in jurisdictions of the common and civil law. Climate Law 2021, 10(2): 151–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. H., Hösli, A., Corporate climate responsibility – the rise of a new governance issue. Sui Generis 2021, 84: 83–92.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. A., Israel, Palestine, and the Oslo Accords. Fordham International Law Journal 1999, 23(1): article 4.Google Scholar
Weizenbaum, J., Computer Power and Human Reason. W.H. Freeman, 1976.Google Scholar
Wenz, P., Environmental Justice. SUNY Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Wewerinke-Singh, M., Aguon, J., Hunter, J., Bringing climate change before the International Court of Justice: prospects for contentious cases and advisory opinions, in Alogna, I., Bakker, C., Gauci, J.-P. (eds.), Climate Change Litigation. Brill, Nijhoff, 2021, p. 395.Google Scholar
Wijffelaars, M., van Harn, E-J., Ukraine War Poses a Threat to EU Industry. 12 April 2022. https://economics.rabobank.com/publications/2022/april/ukraine-war-revives-supply-chain-crisis.Google Scholar
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., et al., Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet 2019, 393(10170): 447–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., The EAT–Lancet Commission: a flawed approach? – Authors’ reply. The Lancet 2019, 394(10204): 1141–1142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C. A., Fiduciary duties and corporate climate responsibility. Vanderbilt Law Review 2021, 74(6): 1875–1916.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O., The power of story. American Educator 2002, 26(1): 8–11.Google Scholar
Wishart, D. M., The breakdown of the Johnston negotiations over the Jordan waters. Middle Eastern Studies 1990, 26(4): 536–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfrum, R., Obligations of result versus obligations of conduct: some thoughts about the implementation of international obligations, in Arsanjani, M. H., Cogan, J. K., Sloane, R. D., Wiessner, S. (eds), Looking to the Future. Brill, 2010, pp. 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouters, J., Marx, A., Geraets, D., Natens, B. (eds.), Global Governance through Trade – EU Policies and Approaches. Edward Elgar, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wróblewski, Z., Natura i cele: dyskusja argumentu teleologicznego na rzecz ochrony przyrody. Lublin, 2010.Google Scholar
Xi, J., Speech at Opening Ceremony of 2018 FOCAC Beijing Summit. FOCAC Beijing Summit, 3 September 2018. www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-09/03/c_129946189.htm.Google Scholar
Xi, J., Speech at the General Debate of the 75th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. CGTN, 2020. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-09-23/Full-text-Xi-Jinping-s-speech-at-General-Debate-of-UNGA-U07X2dn8Ag/index.html.Google Scholar
Xi, J., Statement at the General Debate of the 76th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. 2021. www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202109/22/WS614a8126a310cdd39bc6a935.html.Google Scholar
Xiao, H., Zhao, W., Shan, Y., Guan, D., CO2 emission accounts of Russia’s constituent entities 2005–2019. Scientific Data 2021, 8: 172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xie, Zhenhua, Explanation of the Timetable and Roadmap for the ‘1+N’ Policy System to Realize the Dual Carbon Goals [解振华详解制定1+N政策体系作为实现双碳目标的时间表、路线图]. 2021. www.ncsc.org.cn/xwdt/gnxw/202107/t20210727_851433.shtml.Google Scholar
Xue, G., Climate change challenges and the Law of the Sea responses, in Ruppel, O. C., Roschmann, C., Ruppel-Schlichting, K. (eds.), Climate Change: International Law and Global Governance. Nomos, 2013, pp. 549–592.Google Scholar
Yanes, J., Digital technologies: the climate impact that hardly anyone talks about. 2022. www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/science/environment/climate-impact-digital-technologies.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Tillman, H., Perspective from China’s international cooperation in the framework of the Polar Silk Road, in Corell, R. W., Kim, J. D., Kim, Y. H., et al. (eds.), The Arctic in World Affairs: A North Pacific Dialogue on Arctic 2030 and Beyond – Pathways to the Future. Korea Maritime Institute and East–West Center, 2018, pp. 275–292.Google Scholar
Yankson, P. W. K., Asiedu, A. B., Owusu, K., Urban, F., Siciliano, G., The livelihood challenges of resettled communities of the Bui Dam project in Ghana and the role of Chinese dam-builders. Development Policy Review 2018, 36(S1): O476–O494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, S., Explainer: Paris Agreement on climate change to ‘enter into force’. Carbon Brief, 6 October 2016. www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-paris-agreement-to-enter-into-force.Google Scholar
Yihdego, Z., Rieu-Clarke, A., Cascão, A. E., How has the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam changed the legal, political, economic and scientific dynamics in the Nile Basin? Water International 2016, 41(4): 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yildirim, A., Basedow, R., Fiorini, M., Hoekman, B., EU trade and non-trade objectives: new survey evidence on policy design and effectiveness. Journal of Common Market Studies 2021, 59(3): 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. R., Governing Complex Systems: Social Capital for the Anthropocene. MIT Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. R., Grand Challenges of Planetary Governance: Global Order in Turbulent Times. Edward Elgar, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, H., Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiatives and establishment of the Asian infrastructure investment bank. Journal of Contemporary China 2017, 26: 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Záboji, N., F.A.Z. Exklusiv: Wichtige Wasserstoff-Allianz Wackelt. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 25 May 2021. www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/klima-energie-und-umwelt/wichtige-wasserstoff-kooperation-mit-marokko-wackelt-17356427.html.Google Scholar
Zachmann, G., Holz, F., Roth, A., et al., Decarbonisation of Energy: Determining a Robust Mix of Energy Carriers for a Carbon-neutral EU. Study Requested by the ITRE Committee (Luxembourg: European Parliament, 2021).Google Scholar
Zagmutt, F. J., Pouzou, J. G., Costard, S., The EAT–Lancet Commission: a flawed approach?’ The Lancet 2019, 394(10204): 1140–1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zagzebski, L., Emotion and moral judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2003, 66(1): 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahar, A., Shell and the Essential Irreducibility of Collective Responsibility for Climate Change. SSRN, 2021. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3898915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamfir, J., Human Rights in EU Trade Agreements: The Human Rights Clause and Its Application. Doc. PE 637.975, 2019.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2008, 8(4): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitoun, M., Lankford, B., Krueger, T., et al., Reductionist and integrative research approaches to complex water security policy challenges. Global Environmental Change 2016, 39: 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., Warner, J., Transboundary water interaction II: the influence of ‘soft’ power. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2011, 11(2): 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q., Analysis of the impact on sustainable development by investment regulations in the Energy Charter Treaty. Journal of World Energy Law and Business 2015, 8(6): 542–548.Google Scholar
Zhang, R., To suspend or not to suspend: a cost–benefit analysis of Three Chinese mega-projects in Myanmar. Pacific Review 2021, 34: 946–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zilic, L., Procedural human rights in environmental cases: principles established in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Anali Pravong Fakulteta Univerziteta u Zenici 2019, 12(23): 53–67.Google Scholar
Zwickle, A., Wilson, R., Construing risk: implications for risk communication, in Arvai, J., Louie, R. I. (eds.) Effective Risk Communication. Routledge, 2013, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Ottavio Quirico, University of New England, University for Foreigners of Perugia and Australian National University, Canberra, Walter Baber, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: Implementing Climate Change Policy
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009341493.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Ottavio Quirico, University of New England, University for Foreigners of Perugia and Australian National University, Canberra, Walter Baber, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: Implementing Climate Change Policy
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009341493.025
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Ottavio Quirico, University of New England, University for Foreigners of Perugia and Australian National University, Canberra, Walter Baber, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: Implementing Climate Change Policy
  • Online publication: 22 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009341493.025
Available formats
×