Book contents
- The Hughes Court
- The Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States
- Additional material
- Additional material
- The Hughes Court
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Introduction
- Part I The Opening Years
- Part II Continuities
- Section A: Administrative Law
- Section B: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Chapter 23 The Uncertainties of Theory
- Chapter 24 Progressivism, Prohibition, and Organized Crime
- Chapter 25 Race, Criminal Justice, and “Labor Defense”
- Chapter 26 Race and Strategic Litigation
- Chapter 27 The Hughes Court and Radical Political Dissent
- Chapter 28 The Hughes Court and Radical Religious Dissent
- Section C: Justiciability
- Part III New Approaches Begin to Emerge
- Historiographical Essay
- Index
Chapter 27 - The Hughes Court and Radical Political Dissent
from Section B: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 January 2022
- The Hughes Court
- The Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States
- Additional material
- Additional material
- The Hughes Court
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Introduction
- Part I The Opening Years
- Part II Continuities
- Section A: Administrative Law
- Section B: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Chapter 23 The Uncertainties of Theory
- Chapter 24 Progressivism, Prohibition, and Organized Crime
- Chapter 25 Race, Criminal Justice, and “Labor Defense”
- Chapter 26 Race and Strategic Litigation
- Chapter 27 The Hughes Court and Radical Political Dissent
- Chapter 28 The Hughes Court and Radical Religious Dissent
- Section C: Justiciability
- Part III New Approaches Begin to Emerge
- Historiographical Essay
- Index
Summary
Radical political dissent on the right and left presented the Court with numerous problems. Overall, the Court developed a law of free expression that offered substantial protection to political dissidents. It invalidated a Minnesota statute authorizing courts to issue injunctions agains publication of liberlous material and a California statute banning display of the Communist red flag. It invalidated convictions of Communist organizers in Oregon and Georgia. And, protecting dissident news writers against political retaliation, it upheld the application of the National Labor Relations Act to the Associated Press and other news organizations.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Hughes CourtFrom Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930 to 1941, pp. 679 - 725Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022