Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2012
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A History of the English Language , pp. 445 - 478Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
Adamson, S. 1989. With double tongue. In (ed.), Reading, Analysing and Teaching Literature. London: Longman, 204–40.Google Scholar
Adamson, S. 2000. A lovely little example: word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Fischer et al. (eds.), 39–66.CrossRef
Aitchison, J. 1994a. ‘Say, say it again Sam’: the treatment of repetition in linguistics. In (ed.), Repetition (SPELL 7). Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 15–34.Google Scholar
1994b. Words in the Mind: an Introduction to the Mental Lexicon, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001. Language Change: Progress or Decay, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aitken, A. J. 1981. The Scottish vowel-length rule. In (eds.), So Meny People Longages and Tongues. Edinburgh: Benskin & Samuels, 131–57.Google Scholar
Algeo, J. 1998. Vocabulary. In Romaine (ed.), 57–91.
(ed.). 2001. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 6, English in North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (eds.). 1991. Fifty Years ‘Among the New Words’: A Dictionary of Neologisms, 1941–1991. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Alex. 1999. Communication at the English Speaking Union world members conference, Sydney, August.
1995. Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997. The origins of the ‘group genitive’ in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95: 111–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973–6. The Linguistic Atlas of the Upper Midwest, 3 vols. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
1965. A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800, vol. 1, English Grammars Written in English. Leeds: E. J. Arnold & Son.Google Scholar
American Fact Finder. 2002. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/BasicFactsServlet
1941. Old English Material in the Leningrad Manuscript of Bede's Ecclesiastical History (Acta Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis 31). Lund: University of Lund.Google Scholar
& . 1999. The orthography and phonology of the Ormulum. English Language and Linguistics 3: 299–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M. 1980. The relevance of productivity in a synchronic description of word formation. In (ed.), Historical Morphology (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 17). The Hague: Mouton, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. The orthographic system of an early English printer: Wynkyn de Worde. Folia Linguistica Historica 8: 65–97.Google Scholar
1996. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: a sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 25: 333–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1953. A Survey of Verb Forms in the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, F. 1994. The effect of exposure to Standard English: the language of William Clift. In & (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600–1800. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 285–313.Google Scholar
Australian National Dictionary: Australian Words and their Origins, ed. . 1988. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
1967. A Dictionary of Canadianisms on Historical Principles. Toronto: Gage. Repr. 1991.Google Scholar
& . n.d. Writings on Canadian English, 1792–1975: an Annotated Bibliography. Toronto: Fitzhenry and Whiteside.Google Scholar
Axtell, James. 2000. Babel of tongues: communicating with the Indians in eastern North America. In & (eds.), The Language Encounter in the Americas, 1492–1800. New York: Berghahn Books, 15–60.Google Scholar
1989. A Corpus-Based Approach to Morphological Productivity: Statistical Analysis and Psycholinguistic Interpretation. Amsterdam: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica.Google Scholar
. 1998. Word Order Patterns in Early Modern English, with Special Reference to the Position of the Subject and the Finite Verb (Studia Anglistica Norvegica 9). Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Richard W. 1982. The English language in Canada. In Bailey & Görlach (eds.), 134–76.
1991. Images of English: a Cultural History of the Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003. The foundation of English in the Louisiana Purchase: New Orleans, 1800–1850. American Speech 78: 353–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Richard W. 2004. American English: its origin and history. In Finegan & Rickford (eds.), 3–17.
& (eds.). 1982. English as a World Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Baker, R. 1770. Reflections on the English Language. London. Repr. in facs. by , 1974, English Linguistics 1500–1800 (English Linguistics 87). London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
1964. Linguistic Change in Present-Day English. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Barber, C. 1985. Linguistic change in Present-Day English. In & (eds.), Papers on Language and Literature: Presented to Alvar Ellegård and Erik Frykman (Gothenburg Studies in English 60). Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 36–45.Google Scholar
1997. Early Modern English, 2nd edn (1st edn 1976). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
The Barnhart Dictionary Companion. 1997. http://www.m-w.com/mw/textonly/info/barn/barn3.htm.
& . 1995. Increased choice of female phonetic attributes between first names of boys and girls. Sex Roles 32: 809–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2003. Final letter compared with final phoneme in male and female names. Names 51: 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. Watching English Change: an Introduction to the Study of Linguistic Change in Standard Englishes in the Twentieth Century (Learning about Language). London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
& . 1978. A History of the English Language, 3rd edn. 5th edn, 2002. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
& (eds.). 1986. London 1500–1700: the Making of the Metropolis. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 1994. Descriptions of dialect and areal distributions. In & (eds.), Speaking in Our Tongues. Woodbridge, Suffolk: D. S. Brewer, 169–87.Google Scholar
, , & (eds.). 2000. Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: a Dialogue from 10 ICEHL (Topics in English Linguistics 31). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef
, & (eds.). 1997. Language Variety in the South Revisited. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
. 1977. The interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. MS, University of Amsterdam. Published in Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 20 (1981): 1–78.Google Scholar
1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & E. Finegan. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers of English. In & (eds.), To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique, 253–75. Repr. in Conrad & Biber (eds.), 2001.Google Scholar
Biber, D., E. Finegan & D. Atkinson. 1994. ARCHER and its challenges: compiling and exploring a representative corpus of historical English registers. In , & (eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1–13.Google Scholar
1987. The spread of printing in English during the fifteenth century. Gutenberg Jahrbuch, 26–36.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 2, 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’. Language in Society 4: 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, Joseph & T. Northcote Toller. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, with supplements by Toller (1921) and by (1972).Google Scholar
1987. A Dictionary of South African English, 3rd edn. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1992. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Native American Placenames of the United States. Norman, OK: Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Margery Fee. 2001. Canadian English. In (ed.), 422–40.
British Film Institute. 1996. Film and Television Handbook. London: British Film Institute.
British National Corpus. www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/.
1991. On Middle English she, sho: a Scots solution to an English problem. NOWELE 17:52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, D. (ed.). 1996. English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (8. ICEHL, Edinburgh, 19–23 Sept. 1994). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2000. Henry Machyn, Axel Wijk and the case of the wrong Riding: the south-west Yorkshire character of the language of Machyn's diary. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 101: 571–96.Google Scholar
Brook, G. L. 1955. Introduction to Old English. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bronstein, A. 1990. The development of pronunciation in English language dictionaries. In (ed.), Studies in the Pronunciation of English. London and New York: Routledge, 137–52.Google Scholar
Brown, K. 1991. Double modals in Hawick Scots. In & (eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation. London: Longman, 74–103.
& . 1980. Auxiliary verbs in Edinburgh speech. Transactions of the Philosophical Society 78: 81–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1994. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 5, English in Britain and Overseas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. The History of the English Language: a Source Book. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1987. Are Black and White vernaculars diverging? Papers from the NWAVE ⅪV Panel Discussion. American Speech 62. 1.Google Scholar
CHEL = Cambridge History of the English Language, 6 vols. CHEL 1 = Hogg, 1992a; CHEL 2 = Blake, 1992; CHEL 3 = Lass, 1999a; CHEL 4 = Romaine, 1998; CHEL 5 = Burchfield, 1994; CHEL 6 = Algeo, 2001.
2000. Styling the worker: gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 323–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Kenneth. 1965–71. Scandinavian settlement in the territory of the Five Boroughs (parts I–III). Published in separate periodicals; collected and reprinted in Cameron (ed.), 1977: 115–71.
(ed.). 1977. Place-Name Evidence for the Anglo-Saxon Invasion and Scandinavian Settlements. Nottingham: English Place-Name Society.Google Scholar
(with a contribution by John Insley). 1998. A Dictionary of Lincolnshire Place-Names. Nottingham: English Place-Name Society.Google Scholar
2002. Final -e and spelling habits in the fifteenth-century versions of the Wife of Bath's Prologue. English Studies 83: 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Studies on Middle English Local Bynames in East Anglia (Lund Studies in English 79). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
1939. Nominal Compounds in Germanic (St Andrews University Publications 41). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1987. American Regional Dialects: a Word Geography. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, Craig M. 1992. The Mayflower to the Model-T: the development of American English. In & (eds.), English in Its Social Contexts: Essays in Historical Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 131–54.Google Scholar
Cassidy, F. G. & J. H. Hall. 2001. Americanisms. In Algeo (ed.), 184–218.
& (eds.). 1980. Dictionary of Jamaican English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
& (eds.). 1985–. Dictionary of American Regional English, 5 vols. Cambridge, MA: Belknap. [= DARE]Google Scholar
Catto, J. I. 1984. Citizens, scholars and masters. In (ed.), The History of the University of Oxford, vol. 1, The Early Oxford Schools. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 151–92.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1986. Three kinds of standard in Canadian English. In (ed.), In Search of the Standard in Canadian English. Kingston, Ontario: Strathy Language Unit, Queen's University, Occasional Papers Number 1, 1–15.
Chambers, J. K. 1991. Canada. In Cheshire (ed.), 89–107.
Chambers, J. K. 1993. ‘Lawless and vulgar innovations’: Victorian views of Canadian English. In (ed.), Focus on Canada (Varieties of English Around the World). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1998. English: Canadian varieties. In (ed.), Language in Canada. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 252–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance, 2nd edn (Language in Society). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chapman, Carol. 1998. A subject–verb agreement hierarchy: evidence from analogical change in modern English dialects. In & (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1995. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1938. Non-Celtic Place-Names in Wales (London Mediaeval Studies 1). London: University College.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J., V. Edwards & P. Whittle. 1993. Non-standard English and dialect levelling. In & (eds.), Real English: the Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London and New York: Longman, 53–96.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1991. English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Multi-Word Verbs in Early Modern English: a Corpus-Based Study (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 32). Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1982. The early personal names of King's Lynn: an essay in socio-cultural history, part I: baptismal names. Nomina 6: 51–71. Repr. in Jackson (ed.), 1995: 241–57.Google Scholar
. 1983. The early personal names of King's Lynn: an essay in socio-cultural history, part II: by-names. Nomina 7: 65–89. Repr. in Jackson (ed.), 1995: 258–79.Google Scholar
. 1987a. English personal names ca. 650–1300: some prosopographical bearings. Medieval Prosopography 8: 31–60.Google Scholar
. 1987b. Willelmus rex? vel alius Willelmus?Nomina 11: 7–33. Repr. in Jackson (ed.), 1995: 280–98.Google Scholar
Clark, Cecily. 1992a. Onomastics. In Hogg (ed.), 452–89.
Clark, Cecily. 1992b. Onomastics. In Blake (ed.), 542–606.
Clark, Cecily. 1992c. The myth of the Anglo-Norman scribe. In Rissanen et al. (eds.), 117–29. Repr. in Jackson (ed.), 1995: 168–76.
(ed.). 1993. Focus on Canada (Varieties of English around the World 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997a. The scriptorium of the Mercian Rushworth Gloss: a bilingual perspective. Notes and Queries 242: 453–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Richard. 1997b. The plural of singular -ing: an alternative application of Old English -ingas. In Rumble & Mills (eds.), 26–49.
Coates, Richard. 1998. Onomastics. In Romaine (ed.), 330–72.
. 2000. Singular definite expressions with a unique denotatum and the limits of properhood. Linguistics 38.6 [370]: 1161–74.Google Scholar
Coates, Richard. 2005a. A new theory of properhood. In and (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Onomastic Sciences, Uppsala, August 2002. Uppsala: SOFI.Google Scholar
. 2005b. A speculative psycholinguistic model of onymization. Rivista Italiana Onomastica (International series 1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Coates, Richard. forthcoming b. The grammar of Scandinavian place-names in England: a preliminary commentary. To appear in Doreen Waugh et al. (eds.), Cultural Contacts in the North Atlantic Region. Proceedings of the SNSBI conference at Lerwick, Shetland, April 2003.
1988. The Medieval English Universities: Oxford and Cambridge to c.1500. Aldershot: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. The origin, distribution and use of the place-name element ōra and its relationship to the element ofer. Journal of the English Place-Name Society 22: 26–41.Google Scholar
. 1992. Distribution and use of the Old English place-name mere-tūn. Journal of the English Place-Name Society 24: 30–41.Google Scholar
. 1993. The distribution and use of mere as a generic in place-names. Journal of the English Place-Name Society 25: 38–50.Google Scholar
. 1984. Anglo-Saxon pennies and Old English phonology. Folia Linguistica Historica 5: 91–143.Google Scholar
Colman, Fran. 1988a. Heavy arguments in Old English. In & (eds.), Edinburgh Studies in the English Language 1. Edinburgh: John Donald, 33–89.Google Scholar
Colman, Fran. 1988b. What is in a name? In (ed.), Historical Dialectology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 111–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Numismatics, names and neutralisations. Transactions of the Philological Society 88: 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Money Talks (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 56). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
& (eds.). 2001. Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
1989. Herefordshire Place-Names. London: British Archaeological Reports (British series 214).Google Scholar
Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse. University of Michigan. 2000. http://www.hti.umich.edu/c/cme/
Coseriu, E. 1973. Probleme der strukturellen Semantik, ed. (Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 40). 2nd edn, 1976. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 1988. Dialect in Use: Sociolinguistic Variation in Cardiff English. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Cowie, C. & C. Dalton-Puffer. 2002. Diachronic word-formation and studying changes in productivity over time: theoretical and methodological considerations. In (ed.), A Changing World of Words: Studies in English Historical Lexicography, Lexicology and Semantics. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 410–37.Google Scholar
1976. The place-names of the earliest English records. Journal of the English Place-Name Society 8: 12–66.Google Scholar
. 1988. Furze, gorse and whin: an aside on Rutland in the Danelaw. Journal of the English Place-Name Society 20: 3–10.Google Scholar
. 1990. Rutland in the Danelaw: a field-names perspective. Journal of the English Place-Name Society 22: 7–22.Google Scholar
1980. Literacy and Social Order: Reading and Writing in Tudor and Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Explaining Language Change: an Evolutionary Approach (Longman Linguistics Library). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
1986. Lexical Semantics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000. Meaning in Language: an Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1980. Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In , & (eds.), Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk. London: Longman, 153–66.Google Scholar
. 1997. English as a Global Language. 2nd edn, 2003. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. 2nd edn, 2003. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cullen, Paul. 1997. The place-names of the lathes of St Augustine and Shipway, Kent. PhD dissertation, University of Sussex (unpublished).
& . 1996. The borrowing of Classical and Romance words into English: a study based on the electronic Oxford English Dictionary. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 1 (2): 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. The French Influence on Middle English Morphology: a Corpus-Based Study of Derivation (Topics in English Linguistics 20). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. 2002. Is there a social element in English word-stress? Explorations into a non-categorial treatment of English stress: a long-term view. In & (eds.), The History of English in a Social Context: a Contribution to Historical Sociolinguistics (Trends in Linguistics 129). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 91–113.Google Scholar
& . 2000. Categorywise, some compound type morphemes seem to be rather suffix-like: on the status of -ful, -type and -wise in Present Day English. Folia Linguistica 34: 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& (eds.). 2000. Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danchev, A. 1997. The Middle English creolization hypothesis revisited. In (ed.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics (Trends in Linguistics / Studies and Monographs 103). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 79–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1963. John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation (1551, 1569, 1570), part 2, Phonology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Davidse, K. 1996. Functional dimensions of the dative in English. In & (eds.), The Dative, vol. I, Descriptive Studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 289–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1958. The genesis of the Old English dialects: a new hypothesis. Language 34: 232–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. Number and Case Relations in 19th Century British English: a Comparative Study of Grammar and Usage. Antwerp and Amsterdam: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1985. The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered. In , , & (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics: Amsterdam, 10–13 April 1985 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 41). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 45–60.
Denison, D. 1998. Syntax. In Romaine (ed.), 92–329.
Denison, D. 2000a. Combining English auxiliaries. In Fischer et al. (eds.), 111–47.
Denison, D. 2000b. So what's new? How do we recognise linguistic change. Paper given at ESSE 5, Helsinki.
Digital Library Production Services/Program Development, June 2000. University of Michigan. http://www.umdl.umich.edu/monthly/200006
. 1966. The significance of the distribution of the English place-name in -ingas, -inga- in south-east England. Medieval Archaeology 10: 1–29. Repr. in Cameron (ed.), 1977: 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1967. Various forms of Old English -ing in English place-names. Beiträge zur Namenforschung (new series) 2: 325–96.Google Scholar
. 1968. Various English place-name formations containing Old English -ing. Beiträge zur Namenforschung (new series) 3: 141–89.Google Scholar
2003. The Louisiana Purchase and American English. American Speech 78: 347–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2001. Style and social meaning. In & (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 119–26.Google Scholar
Education: Elementary and Secondary Schools. Public Record Office. 2001. http://catalogue.pro.gov.uk/Leaflets/ri2172.htm
Edwards, John. 1992. Sociopolitical aspects of language maintenance and loss: towards a typology of minority language situations. In , & (eds.), Maintenance and Loss of Minority Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1956. Studies on the Population of Medieval London (Filologisk-filosofiska series 2). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
. 1960. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Place-Names, 4th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, M. 2003. Particle verbs in early Middle English: the case of up. In & (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 45–57.Google Scholar
. 1953. The Auxiliary ‘do’: the Establishment and Regulation of its Growth in English (Gothenburg Studies in English 2). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
1869. On Early English Pronunciation (Early English Text Society, Extra Series 2). Repr. 1968. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
1874. Early English Pronunciation, with Especial Reference to Shakspere and Chaucer, part 4. London: Asher.Google Scholar
1875. On the classification of Modern English dialects [summary only]. Transactions of the Philological Society 16 (Minutes of meetings): 15–16.Google Scholar
1889. On Early English Pronunciation, vol. 5, The existing phonology of English dialects compared with that of West Saxon (Early English Text Society, Extra Series 56). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997. The Perfect and the Preterite in Contemporary and Earlier English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1875. The dialect of West Somerset. Transactions of the Philological Society 15: 197–272.Google Scholar
Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2001. DVD-ROM, Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.
& . 2000. The use of the present perfect in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 20: 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethnologue. 1988, 1992. Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
. 1992. Unusual and Most Popular Baby Names. Lincolnwood, IL: Publications International.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2001. Grammatical Relations in Change (Studies in Language Companion Series 56). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996a. The gerund in Early Modern English: evidence from the Helsinki Corpus. Folia Linguistica Historica 17: 97–152.Google Scholar
1996b. The development of gerunds as objects of subject-control verbs in English (1400–1760). Diachronica 13: 29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Developments in argument linking in early Modern English gerund phrases. English Language and Linguistics 2: 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Vikings in the British Isles: the place-name evidence. Acta Archaeologica 71: 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1972. Scandinavian Settlement Names in Yorkshire (Navnestudier 11). Copenhagen: Institut for Navneforskning.Google Scholar
. 1978. Scandinavian Settlement Names in the East Midlands (Navnestudier 16). Copenhagen: Institut for Navneforskning.Google Scholar
. 1985. Scandinavian Settlement Names in the North-West (Navnestudier 25). Copenhagen: Institut for Navneforskning.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1968. The case for case. In & (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1–88.Google Scholar
, & (eds.). 2002a. The Celtic Roots of English (Studies in Language 37). University of Joensuu: Faculty of Humanities.Google Scholar
Filppula, M., J. Klemola & H. Pitkänen. 2002b. Early contacts between English and the Celtic languages. In Filppula, Klemola & Pitkänen (eds.), 1–26.
Finegan, E. 1998. English grammar and usage. In Romaine (ed.), 536–88.
& (eds.). 2004. Language in the USA: Themes for the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & . 1970. A Chronological English Dictionary Listing 80,000 Words in Order of their Earliest Known Occurrence. Heidelberg: Winter. [= CED]Google Scholar
, & . 1973. Ordered Profusion. Studies in Dictionaries and the English Lexicon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Finlay, R. & B. Shearer. 1986. Population growth and suburban expansion. In & (eds.), London 1500–1700: the Making of the Metropolis. London and New York: Longman, 37–59.Google Scholar
. 1989. Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1958. Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variable. Word 14: 47–56. Repr. in Hymes (ed.), 1964: 483–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. 1992. Syntax. In Blake (ed.), 207–408.
Fischer, O. 1997. Infinitive marking in late Middle English: transitivity and changes in the English system of case. In & (eds.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 109–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. 2000. The position of the adjective in Old English. In Bermúdez-Otero et al. (eds.), 153–81.
2004. Developments in the category adjective from Old to Middle English. Studies in Medieval English Language and Literature 19: 1–36.Google Scholar
, , & . 2000. The Syntax of Early English (Cambridge Syntax Guides 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. & F. van der Leek. 1987. A ‘case’ for the Old English impersonal. In , , & (eds.), Explanation and Linguistic Change (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 45). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 79–120.Google Scholar
& (eds.). 2001. The Motivated Sign. Iconicity in Language and Literature 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
, & (eds.). 2000. Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. H. 2001. British and American, continuity and divergence. In Algeo (ed.), 59–85.
1977. Sociolinguistics and Middle English: some socially motivated changes in the history of English. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny 24: 247–59.Google Scholar
Flint, M. 1740. Prononciation de la langue angloise. In H. Kökeritz, 1944, Mather Flint on early English pronunciation. Skrifta Utgivna af Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskapsamfundet i Uppsala, 37.
. 1935. Middle English Surnames of Occupation, 1100–1350 (Lund Studies in English 3). Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
1914. Die gelehrten lateinischen Lehn- und Fremdwörter in der altenglischen Literatur von der Mitte des X. Jahrhunderts bis um das Jahr 1066. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2003. ‘I sauh a tour on a toft, tryelyche i-maket’ part II: on place-names in toft in England. Nomina 26: 43–63.Google Scholar
1996. Afterword. In The Complete Stories by Zora Neale Hurston. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
1971. The Viking Legacy: the Scandinavian Influence on the English and Gaelic Languages. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.Google Scholar
, & . 1970. The Names of Towns and Cities in Britain. London: Batsford. [Sometimes catalogued under Nicolaisen.]Google Scholar
Gil, A. 1619. Logonomia Anglica. In & (eds.), 1972, Alexander Gil's Logonomia Anglica, 1619, 2 vols. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Giles, H. & P. Smith. 1979. Accommodation theory: optimal levels of convergence. In & (eds.), Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1982. The Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe, 6500–3500 BC: Myths and Cult Images, 2nd edn. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
1962. An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. 2nd edn, 1970; 3rd edn, 1980. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1972. The origin of Standard Old English and Æthelwold's school at Winchester. Anglo-Saxon England 1: 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneuss, H. 1985. Linguistic borrowing and Old English lexicography: Old English terms for the books of liturgy. In (ed.), Problems of Old English Lexicography. Studies in Memory of Angus Cameron. Heidelberg: Winter, 109–29.Google Scholar
Godden, M. R. 1992. Literary language. In Hogg (ed.), 490–535.
(ed.). 2001. A Dictionary of European Anglicisms: a Usage Dictionary of Anglicisms in Sixteen European Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Görlach, M. 1986. Middle English – a creole? In & (eds.), Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries: in Honour of Jacek Fisiak on the Occasion of his Fiftieth Birthday, vol. 1 (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 32). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991, Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. Englishes: Studies in Varieties of English, 1984–1988. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. Einführung ins Frühneuenglische (Sprachwissenschaftliche Studienbücher. 1. Abteilung), 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
1995. More Englishes: New Studies in Varieties of English, 1988–1994. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. English in Nineteenth-Century England: an Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Eighteenth-Century English (Sprachwissenschaftliche Studienbücher). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Graddol, David. 1999. The decline of the native speaker. In & (eds.), English in a Changing World. AILA Review 13: 57–68.Google Scholar
2002. African American English: a Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1711. An Essay towards a Practical English Grammar. London. Repr. in facsimile by , 1974, English Linguistics 1500–1800 (English Linguistics 128). London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore A. & Lindsay J. Whaley. 1998. Toward a typology of language endangerment. In & (eds.), Endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 22–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, G. & J. Vonwiller. 1989. The high rising tone in Australian English. In & (eds.), Australian English: the Language of a New Society. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
, , , & . 1986. An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15: 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, E. 2002. Inflectional morphology and the loss of verb-second in English. In Lightfoot (ed.), 88–106.
1997. Register variation, truncation, and subject omission in English and in French. English Language and Linguistics 1: 233–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1993. Some grammatical problems of scientific English. In & , Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press, 69–85.Google Scholar
1991. Settlement mobility and the ‘Middle Saxon Shift’: rural settlements and settlement patterns in Anglo-Saxon England. Anglo-Saxon England 21: 1–17.Google Scholar
. 1993. The present-day distribution of surnames in the British Isles. Nomina 16: 79–98.Google Scholar
& . 1998. Proper name anomia and anomia for the names of people: functionally dissociable impairments?Cortex 34: 155–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1984. The historical implications of the Scandinavian linguistic element in English: a theoretical evaluation. NOWELE 4: 53–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1590 [1972]. A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia [facsimile edition of the complete 1590 Theodor de Bry edn, with intro. by Paul Hulton]. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
& . 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1569. An orthographie, conteyning the due Order and Reason, howe to Write or Paint Thimage of Mannes Voice, most like to the Life or Nature. London.Google Scholar
1985. Guide to pronunciation. Dictionary of American Regional English, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, ⅻ–ⅼⅺ.Google Scholar
& . 1980. Microfiche Concordance of Old English. Toronto: University of Toronto (Centre for Medieval Studies). [= MCOE]Google Scholar
Heikkonen, Kirsi. 1996. Regional variation in standardization: a case study of Henry V's Signet Office. In Nevalainen & Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.), 111–27.
Hellinga, W. & L. Hellinga. 1984. Between two languages: Caxton's translation of Reynaert de Vos. In & (eds.), Studies in Seventeenth-Century English Literature, History and Bibliography. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 119–131.Google Scholar
. 1998. The Distinctive Surnames of Staffordshire. Earl Lecture (Staffordshire Studies 10). Newcastle under Lyme: Keele University.Google Scholar
1983. The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Ser. B., Tom. 160). Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
& . 1995. The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 407–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Middle English nicknames in the Lay Subsidy Rolls for Warwickshire (Studia Anglica Upsaliensia 63). Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
& . 1982. Word Frequencies in British and American English. Bergen: The Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities.Google Scholar
1987. Winchester und der spätaltenglische Sprachgebrauch. Untersuchungen zur geographischen und zeitlichen Verbreitung altenglischer Synonyme (Texte und Untersuchungen zur englischen Philologie 14). Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. 1988. On the impossibility of Old English dialectology. In Kastovsky & Bauer (eds.), 183–204.
(ed.). 1992a. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 1, The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, R. M. 1992b. Phonology and morphology. In Hogg (ed.), 67–167.
Hogg, R. M. 1997. Using the future to predict the past: Old English dialectology in the light of Middle English place-names. In (ed.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, R. M. 2004. North Northumbrian and South Northumbrian: a geographical question? In & (eds.), English Historical Dialectology. Munich: Peter Lang, 241–55.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. forthcoming. Old English dialectology. In van Kemenade & Los (eds.).
Hopper, P. J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In & (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 1, Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& . 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in Universal Grammar. Language 60: 703–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. Patterns of variation and interchangeability in some Old English prefixes. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 81: 127–30.Google Scholar
. 1946. Hurricane, Repr. in The Complete Stories/Zora Neale Hurston. 1996. New York: Harper Perennial, 149–61.Google Scholar
2001. Composite predicates in Middle English with the verbs nimen and taken. Studia Neophilologica 73: 143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihalainen, Ossi. 1994. The dialects of England since 1776. In Burchfield (ed.), 197–274.
Ilson, R. F. 1985. Usage problems in British and American English. In (ed.), The English Language Today. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 166–182.Google Scholar
. 1987. Regional variation in Scandinavian personal nomenclature in England. Nomina 3: 52–60.Google Scholar
. 1994. Scandinavian Personal Names in Norfolk: a Survey Based on Medieval Records and Place-Names (Acta Academiae Regiae Gustavi Adolphi 62). Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Insley, John. 2002. The study of Old English personal names and anthroponymic lexika. In , & (eds.), Person und Name: methodische Probleme bei der Erstellung eines Personennamenbuches des Frühmittelalters. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 148–76.Google Scholar
Ireland, R. J. 1979. Canadian spelling: an empirical and historical survey of selected words. Ph.D. thesis. York University.
(ed.). 1995. Words, Names and History: Selected Writings of Cecily Clark. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Janda, R. D. 1980. On the decline of declensional systems: the overall loss of Old English nominal case inflections and the Middle English reanalysis of -es as his. In , , & (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 243–52.Google Scholar
. 1914. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, part 2: Syntax, vol. 1. Heidelberg: C. Winter. Repr. London: Allen & Unwin, 1961.Google Scholar
1944. Latin versus English: the sixteenth-century debate over scientific terminology. Studies in Philology 41: 109–35.Google Scholar
1755. A Dictionary of the English Language: in which the Words are deduced from their Originals, and illustrated in their Different Significations by Examples from the Best Writers, 2 vols. London: J. F. & C. Rivington.Google Scholar
1994. Alexander Geddes: an eighteenth century Scottish orthoepist and dialectologist. Folia Linguistica Historica 15: 71–103.Google Scholar
1917. An English Pronouncing Dictionary. London: Dent. 14th edn, 1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1918. An Outline of English Phonetics. Leipzig: Teubner. 9th edn, 1963. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
1979. Studies on Middle English Nicknames, I: Compounds (Lund Studies in English 55). Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
1640. The English Grammar. Made by Ben. Johnson. For the benefit of all Strangers, out of his Observations of the English language now spoken, and in use. In The Works of Benjamin Ionson, II.31–84. London: Richard Bishop.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj. 1985. Institutionalized second-language varieties. In (ed.), The English Language Today. Oxford: Pergamon, 211–26.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj. 2001. World Englishes and culture wars. In , , & (eds.), Ariels: Departures and Returns: Essays for Edwin Thumboo. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 392–414.Google Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L. 1994. English in Ireland. In Burchfield (ed.), 148–96.
1968. Old English Deverbal Substantives Derived by Means of a Zero Morpheme. [PhD dissertation, Tübingen University 1967]. Esslingen/N.: Langer.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 1980. Zero in morphology: a means of making up for phonological losses? In (ed.), Historical Morphology (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 17). The Hague: Mouton, 213–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982. Wortbildung und Semantik (Studienreihe Englisch 14). Tübingen/Düsseldorf: Francke/Bagel.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 1985. Deverbal nouns in Old English and Modern English: from stem-formation to word-formation. In (ed.), Historical Semantics. Historical Word-formation (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 29). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 221–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 1986. Diachronic word-formation in a functional perspective. In & (eds.), Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries: in Honour of Jacek Fisiak on the Occasion of his Fiftieth Birthday (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 32). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 409–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 1989. Morphophonemic alternations and the history of English: examples from Old English. In (ed.), Historical English. On the Occasion of Karl Brunner's 100th Birthday (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft. Anglistische Reihe 1). Innsbruck: University of Innsbruck, 112–23.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 1990. Whatever happened to the ablaut nouns in English – and why did it not happen in German? In & (eds.), Historical Linguistics 1987 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 66). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 1992. Semantics and vocabulary. In Hogg (ed.), 290–407.
(ed.). 1994a. Studies in Early Modern English (Topics in English Linguistics 13). Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 1994b. Historical English word-formation. From a monostratal to a polystratal system. In (ed.), Historical English Word-Formation. Papers Read at the Sixth National Conference of the History of English. Urbino: QuattroVenti, 17–31.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 1996. Verbal derivation in English: a historical survey. Or: Much ado about nothing. In Britton (ed.), 93–117.CrossRef
Kastovsky, D. 1999. Hans Marchand's theory of word-formation: Genesis and development. In & (eds.), Form, Function and Variation in English: Studies in Honour of Klaus Hansen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 19–39.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 2000. Words and word-formation: morphology in the OED. In (ed.), Lexicography and the OED: Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 110–25.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 2002a. The derivation of ornative, locative, ablative, privative and reversative verbs in English: a historical sketch. In , & (eds.), English Historical Syntax and Morphology: Selected Papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D. 2002b. The ‘haves’ and the ‘have-nots’ in Germanic and English: from bahuvrihi compounds to affixal derivation. In & (eds.), Of Dyuersitie and Chaunge of language: Essays Presented to Manfred Görlach on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. Heidelberg: C. Winter, 33–46.Google Scholar
& (eds.). 1988. Luick Revisited. Papers Read at the Luick-Symposium at Schloß Liechtenstein, 15–18.9.1985. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
& . 2002. Sexist German – non-sexist English or non-sexist German – sexist English? Historical observations on a pragmatic question. Language Sciences 24: 285–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, D. 2000. Metropolitan values: migration, mobility and cultural norms, London 1100–1700. In (ed.), The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, A. 1997. V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English. In van Kemenade & Vincent (eds.), 326–52.
& (eds.). 1997. Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
& . 1944/1953. A Pronouncing Dictionary of American English. Springfield, MA: Merriam.Google Scholar
1746. A New English Grammar: a Guide to the English Tongue, with Notes. London: Manby & C.Google Scholar
Kirwin, William J. 2001. Newfoundland English. In (ed.), 441–55.
. 1992. Old English dialects and the stages of transition to Middle English. Folia Linguistica Historica 14: 27–87.Google Scholar
. 1993. Geographical variation in Old English prepositions and the location of Ælfric's and other literary dialects. English Studies 74: 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitson, Peter R. 1995. The nature of Old English dialect distributions, mainly as exhibited in charter boundaries, part I: Vocabulary. In (ed.), Medieval Dialectology. Berlin: de Gruyter, 43–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemola, J. 2002. Periphrastic DO: dialectal distribution and origins. In Filppula, Klemola & Pitkänen (eds.), 199–210.
Kohnen, T. 2001. The influence of ‘Latinate’ constructions in Early Modern English: orality and literacy as complementary forces. In & (eds.), Language Contact in the History of English (Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 1). Bern: Lang, 171–94.Google Scholar
Kornexl, L. 2001. ‘Unnatural words’? Loan formations in Old English glosses. In & (eds.), Language Contact in the History of English (Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 1). Frankfurt a. M.: Lang, 195–216.Google Scholar
. 1925. The English Language in America, 2 vols. New York: Modern Language Association. Repr. New York: Frederick Ungar, 1960.Google Scholar
1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1967. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: the Six Northern Counties and Lincolnshire (Lund Studies in English 35). Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
. 1987. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: the West Midland Counties. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
2001. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: the Southern Counties. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, A. & A. Taylor. 1997. Verb movement in Old and Middle English: dialect variation & language contact. In van Kemenade and Vincent (eds.), 297–325.
Kroch, A. & A. Taylor. 2000. Verb–object order in Early Middle English. In Pintzuk et al. (eds.), 132–63.
Kroch, A., A. Taylor & D. Ringe. 2000. The Middle English verb-second constraint: a case study in language contact and language change. In , & (eds.), Textual Parameters in Older Languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 195). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins, 353–91.Google Scholar
Kroesch, S. 1929. Semantic borrowing in Old English. In & (eds.), A Miscellany in Honor of Frederick Klaeber. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 50–72.Google Scholar
. 1949. A Word Geography of the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
& 1939–43. Linguistic Atlas of New England, 6 vols. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
& 1961. Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja & Andrei Danchev. 2001. The Middle English ‘for to + infinitive’ construction. In & (eds.), Language Contact in the History of English (Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 1). Bern: Lang, 35–55.Google Scholar
. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972b. The social motivation of a sound change. In Labov, 1–42.
1994–2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 1, Internal Factors, vol. 2, Social factors. (Language in Society). Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Sharon Ash. 1997. Understanding Birmingham. In Bernstein et al. (eds.), 508–73.
LAEME = & in prep. Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Institute for Historical Dialectology.
1993. Catalogue of Sources for a Linguistic Atlas of Early Medieval English. Cambridge and Rochester, NY: Brewer.Google Scholar
1999. Confusion wrs confounded: litteral substitution sets in early Middle English writing systems. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100: 251–70.Google Scholar
& . 2003. Tales of the 1001 nists: the phonological implications of litteral substitution sets in some thirteenth-century South-West Midland texts. English Language and Linguistics 7: 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, M. R. Lass. forthcoming. Early Middle English dialectology. In van Kemenade & Los (eds.).
LALME = , & . 1986. A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English, 4 vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
2003. The pronunciation of Missouri: variation and change in American English. American Speech 78: 255–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Language Resource Program: Heritage Languages. 2001. University of California at Los Angeles. http://www.isop.ucla.edu./lrp/survey-hl.htm
. 1985. Surnames and Genetic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lass, Roger. 1974. Linguistic orthogenesis? Scots vowel quantity and the English length conspiracy. In & (eds.), Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland, 311–52.Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1988. Vowel shifts, great and otherwise: remarks on Stockwell and Minkova. In Kastovsky & Bauer (eds.), 395–410.
1989. How early does English get modern? Or, what happens if you listen to orthoepists and not to historians. Diachronica 6. 1: 75–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. 1990a. A standard South African vowel system. In (ed.), Studies in the Pronunciation of English. London and New York: Routledge, 272–85.Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1990b. Where do Extraterritorial Englishes come from? Dialect input and recodification in transported Englishes. In , , & (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 245–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Blake (ed.), 23–155.
Lass, R. 1994. Proliferation and option-cutting: the strong verb in the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries. In & (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600–1800. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 81–114.Google Scholar
1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1999a. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 3, 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1999b. Introduction. In Lass (ed.), 1–12.
Lass, R. 1999c. Phonology and morphology. In Lass (ed.), 56–186.
Lass, R. 2001. Language periodization and the concept “middle”. In , , & (eds.), Placing Middle English in Context (Topics in English Linguistics 35). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 7–41.Google Scholar
Lass, R. & M. Laing. forthcoming. Are front rounded vowels retained in West Midland Middle English? Paper delivered at the 4th International Conference on Middle English, Vienna 2002. To appear in the proceedings.
1988. A History of the University of Cambridge, vol. 1, The University to 1546. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levins, P. 1570. Manipulus vocabulorum. In H. B. Wheatley (ed.) 1867, Manipulus vocabulorum: a Rhyming Dictionary of the English Language, by Peter Levins (1570). EETS OS 27.
& . 1992. Children's first names: an empirical study of social taste. American Journal of Sociology 98: 511–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& . 1995. Distinctive African American names: an experimental, historical, and linguistic analysis of innovation. American Sociological Review 60: 928–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 1974. The diachronic analysis of English modals. In & (eds.), Historical Linguistics (Proceedings of the 1st ICHL). Amsterdam: North Holland, vol. 1, 219–41.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. 1997. Shifting triggers and diachronic reanalyses. In van Kemenade & Vincent (eds.), 253–72.
1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2002. Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. English Lexicology. Lexical Structure, Word Semantics and Ford-formation, 3rd edn. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1988. Writings on Canadian English, 1976–1987: a Selective, Annotated Bibliography. Kingston, Ont.: Queens University, Strathy Language Unit, Occasional Papers Number 2.Google Scholar
1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London. Repr. in facsimile by R. C. Alston, 1974, English Linguistics 1500–1800 (English Linguistics 18). London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Lyall, R. J. 1989. Materials: the paper revolution. In & (eds.), Book Production and Publishing in Britain, 1375–1475. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–29.
MacMahon, M. K. C. 1998. Phonology. In Romaine (ed.), 373–535.
1991. Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: a Long-run Comparative View. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1989. In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology and Myth. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
1969. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation, 2nd rev. edn. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
& . 1975, 1977, 1986. The Linguistic Atlas of Scotland, vols. I–III. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1951. A Dictionary of Americanisms on Historical Principles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McClure, J. Derrick. 1994. English in Scotland. In Burchfield (ed.), 23–93.
. 1979. Patterns of migration in the late Middle Ages: the evidence of English place-name surnames. Economic History Review (2nd series) 32: 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998. The interpretation of hypocoristic forms of Middle English baptismal names. Nomina 21: 101–31.Google Scholar
. 1956. The analysis of written Middle English. Transactions of the Philological Society 55: 26–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1963. A new approach to Middle English dialectology. English Studies 44: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Angus. 1983. Present indicative plural forms in the later Middle English of the North Midlands. In & (eds.), Middle English Studies Presented to Norman Davis. Oxford University Press, 235–44. Repr. in (ed.), 1989, Middle English Dialectology. Essays on Some Principles and Problems. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
, & . 1986. A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English, 4 vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
. 1975. Norfolk and Suffolk Surnames in the Middle Ages (English Surnames series 2). London and Chichester: Phillimore.Google Scholar
. 1977. The Surnames of Oxfordshire (English Surnames series 3). Oxford: Leopard's Head Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. The Surnames of Lancashire (English Surnames series 4). Oxford: Leopard's Head Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. The Surnames of Sussex (English Surnames series 5). Oxford: Leopard's Head Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, April. 2003. On not explaining language change: Optimality Theory and the Great Vowel Shift. In (ed.), Motives for Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCOE = Healey & Venezky, 1980.
1937. Introduction à l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
1963. The American Language: an Inquiry into the Development of English in the United States, 4th edn and two supplements, abridged. With annotations and new material by R. I. McDavid Jr. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
. 1994. First Names: the Definitive Guide to Popular Names in England and Wales. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Microsoft Encarta 97 Encyclopedia. 1996. CD-ROM. Microsoft, Redmond, WA.
. 2000. Owls Hoot: How People Name Their Houses. London: John Murray. [See also her MPhil dissertation, ‘The naming of private houses in Britain since 1700’ (Bristol 1978).]Google Scholar
Miller, J. 2004. Perfect and resultative constructions in spoken and non-standard English. In , & (eds.), Up and Down the Cline – the Nature of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 229–46.CrossRef
1991. Oxford Dictionary of English Place-Names. 2nd edn, 1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1992. Linguistic Variation and Change: on the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 1993. On the social origins of language change. In (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives(Longman Linguistics Library). London and New York: Longman, 215–36.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. 1994. The notion of standard language and its applicability to the study of Early Modern English pronunciation. In & (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600–1800. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 19–29.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1998. Children can't speak or write properly any more. In & (eds.), Language Myths. London: Penguin Books, 58–65.Google Scholar
& . 1991. Authority in Language. Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1980. Language and social networks. 2nd edn, 1987 (Language in Society 2). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Minkova, D. & R. P. Stockwell. 1998. The origins of long–short allomorphy in English. In & (eds.), Advances in English Historical Linguistics (Trends in Linguistics 112). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 211–39.Google Scholar
, , & . 1970. Attitudes to English Usage. London: Oxford University Press. Repr. 1975.Google Scholar
& . 2000. Remnants of the old order: OV in the Paston Letters. English Studies 81: 513–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& . 2004. A Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 2001. British and Irish antecedents. In Algeo (ed.), 86–153.
, & . 1935. Middle English dialect characteristics and dialect boundaries. Essays and Studies in English and Comparative Literature. 1–60.Google Scholar
2001. Composite predicates and idiomatisation in Middle English: a corpus-based approach. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 36: 171–87.Google Scholar
1994. Understanding German dative verbs and their English and Dutch equivalents: a contrastive study in cognitive grammar. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 78: 1–124.Google Scholar
1998. Burchfield on usage: remaking Fowler's classic. American Speech 73: 313–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. African-American English. In Algeo (ed.), 291–324.
(ed.). 2000. Lexicography and the OED. Pioneers in the Untrodden Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003. “Talking Proper”: the Rise of Accent as Social Symbol, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1795. English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners. York. Repr. in facsimile by R. C. Alston, 1974, English Linguistics 1500–1800 (English Linguistics 106). London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
1997. Attitudes toward married women's surnames: evidence from the American Midwest. Names 45: 163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1784. Elements of orthoepy: containing a Distinct View of the Whole Analogy of the English Language: so far as it relates to Pronunciation, Accent, and Quantity. London: T. Payne & Son.Google Scholar
National Statistics – the official UK statistics site. 2001. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/
Nevalainen, T. 1987. Change from above: a morphosyntactic comparison of two Early Modern English editions of The Book of Common Prayer. In (ed.), Neophilologica Fennica (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 45). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique, 295–315.Google Scholar
1997. Recyling inversion: the case of initial adverbs and negators in early Modern English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 31: 203–14.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. 1999. Early Modern English lexis and semantics. In Lass (ed.), 332–458.
Nevalainen, T. 2000a. Processes of supralocalisation and the rise of Standard English in the early Modern period. In Bermúdez-Otero et al. (eds.), 329–71.
2000b. Mobility, social networks and language change in Early Modern England. European Journal of English Studies 4: 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & H. Raumolin-Brunberg. 1993. Early Modern English. In Rissanen et al. (eds.), 53–73.
& (eds.). 1996. Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. & H. Raumolin-Brunberg. 2000. The third-person singular -(e)s and -(e)th revisited: the morphophonemic hypothesis. In Dalton-Puffer & Ritt (eds.), 235–48.
& . 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Nicolaisen, W. F. H. 1970. See Gelling et al., 1970.
1930–1935. Alliterative Poetry in Middle English. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Perceptual factors and word order change in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 22: 233–53.Google Scholar
, & (eds.). 1978. The Linguistic Atlas of England. London: Croom Helm. Repr. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. E. 1984a. Informal spelling systems in Early Modern English: 1500–1800. In & (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development. Sheffield: CECTAL, 123–37.Google Scholar
Osselton, N. E. 1984b. Orm and the improvement of English spelling. In & (eds.), Studies in Early Middle English Literature. Leiden: University of Leiden, English Department, 39–50.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 1989, ed. & , 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press. OED online: www.oed.com.Google Scholar
Palsgrave, J. 1530. Lesclarcissement de la langue francoyse.
. 1977. The Survey of Anglo-Welsh Dialects, vol. 1, The South-East. Swansea: University College.Google Scholar
. 1979. The Survey of Anglo-Welsh Dialects, vol. 2, The South West. Swansea: University College.Google Scholar
Parsons, David. 1997. How long did the Scandinavian language survive in England? Again. In et al. (eds.), Vikings and the Danelaw. Select papers from the Proceedings of the 13th Viking Congress. Oxford: Oxbow, 299–312.Google Scholar
& , with the collaboration of Carole Hough. 1997– . The Vocabulary of English Place-Names (in progress; 3 vols. by 2005). Nottingham: Centre for English Name Studies.Google Scholar
et al. (eds.). 1986–93. Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States, 7 vols. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Pederson, Lee. 2001. Dialects. In Algeo (ed.), 253–90.
1981b. Onomasiologische Untersuchungen. Zum skandinavischen Lehngut im Altenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 6: 169–85.Google Scholar
. 1993. Verb seconding in Old English: Verb movement to Infl. The Linguistic Review 10: 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Variation and change in Old English clause structure. Language Variation and Change 7: 229–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
, & (eds.). 2000. Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. Ortsnamenstudien zur angelsächsischen Wanderung (Frankfurter historische Abhandlungen 18). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, F. 1983. Coming into being among the Anglo-Saxons. In , & (eds.), Current Topics in English Historical Linguistics. Odense: Odense University Press, 239–78.Google Scholar
Poppe, E. 2002. The ‘expanded form’ in Insular Celtic and English: some historical and comparative considerations, with special emphasis on Middle Irish. In Filppula, Klemola & Pitkänen (eds.), 237–70.
. 1995. The Surnames of Devon (English Surnames series 6). Oxford: Leopard's Head Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. The Surnames of Leicestershire and Rutland (English Surnames series 7). Oxford: Leopard's Head Press.Google Scholar
1982. The evolution of early Standard English: the creolization hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14: 69–85.Google Scholar
Poussa, P. 1990. A contact-universals origin for periphrastic do, with special consideration of OE-Celtic contact. In , , & (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics: Cambridge, 6–9 April 1987 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 407–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1988. Dictionary of Prince Edward Island English. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis A. 1996. Where the worst English is spoken. In (ed.), Focus on the USA. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 297–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Presidential address: where are the dialects of American English at anyhow?American Speech 78: 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1589. The Arte of English Poesie. London. Repr. 1968 (English Linguistics 110). Menston: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 1985. The English language in a global context. In & (eds.), English in the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–6.Google Scholar
1989. Dictionary of Southern African Place-Names, 2nd edn. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 1998. Social factors and pronominal change in the seventeenth century: the Civil War effect? In & (eds.), Advances in English Historical Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 361–88.Google Scholar
. 1997. Dictionary of Canadian Place-Names. Toronto and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Milestones in the history of English in America, ed. Richard W. Bailey. Publication of the American Dialect Society 86.Google Scholar
. 1919. Studies on uncompounded personal names in Old English. Uppsala: University of Uppsala (inaugural dissertation).Google Scholar
1987. Archaeology and Language: the Puzzle of Indo-European Origins. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Riddle, E. M. 1985. A historical perspective on the productivity of the Suffixes -ness and -ity. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical Semantics, Historical Word-Formation. Berlin: Monton, 435–61.
1967. The Uses of One in Old and Early Middle English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. 1998. Isn't it? or Is it not? On the order of postverbal subject and negative particle in the history of English. In Tieken-Boon van Ostade et al. (eds.), 189–205.
Rissanen, M. 1999a. Syntax. In Lass (ed.), 187–331.
Rissanen, M. 1999b. Language of law and the development of Standard English. In Taavitsainen, Melchers & Pahta (eds.), 189–204.
Rissanen, M. 2000. Standardisation and the language of early statutes. In (ed.), The Development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (eds.). 1992. History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.). 1993. Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1994. Quantity Adjustment: Vowel Lengthening and Shortening in Early Middle English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: a Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. 1997. Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In van Kemenade & Vincent (eds.), 397–426.
(ed.). 1998a. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 4, 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. 1998b. Introduction. In Romaine (ed.), 1–56.
Rosenbach, A., D. Stein & L. Vezzosi. 2000. On the history of the s-genitive. In Bermúdez-Otero et al. (eds.), 183–210.
& (eds.). 1997. Names, Places and People: an Onomastic Miscellany for John McNeal Dodgson. Stamford: Paul Watkins.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1999. The Official Commemorative Album for the Millennium. London: Citroen Wolf Communications.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. 1989. John Rastell and the normalisation of early sixteenth-century orthography. In , & (eds.), Essays on English Language in Honour of Bertil Sundby. Oslo: Novus Forlag, 289–301.Google Scholar
1963. Some applications of Middle English dialectology. English Studies 44: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, M. L. 1971. Kent and the low countries. In , & (eds.), Edinburgh Studies in English and Scots. London: Longman, 1–19.
1965. Superbia. Studien zum altenglischen Wortschatz, vol. 1, Die dialektale und zeitliche Verbreitung des Wortgutes. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
1980. Documentation in the ‘O. E. D.’: Shakespeare and Nash as Test Cases. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1977. Der englische Wortschatz (Grundlagen der Anglistik und Amerikanistik 9). Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schendl, H. 2000. Third person present plural in Shakespeare's First Folio. In Dalton-Puffer & Ritt (eds.), 263–76.
Schneider, E. 1992. Who(m)? Constraints on the loss of case marking of wh-pronouns in the English of Shakespeare and other poets of the Early Modern English period. In Rissanen et al. (eds.), 437–52.CrossRef
2000. Feature diffusion vs. contact effects in the evolution of New Englishes: a typological case study of negation patterns. English World-Wide 21: 201–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, R. M. 1999. Railways and population change in industrializing England: an introduction to historical GIS. http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwart/rail/intro_hist_gis.htm
Seaton, M. 2001. Word up. The Guardian: 21 Sept.
. 1972, 1979. The Anglo-Saxon Heritage in Middle English Personal Names: East Anglia 1100–1399, vols. I, II (Lund Studies in English 43; Acta Reg. Soc. Hum. Litt. Lundensis 73). Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Semenza, Carlo. 1995. How names are special: neuropsychological evidence for dissociable impairment and sparing of proper names. Knowledge in production. In & (eds.), Broken Memories: Neuropsychological Case Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Semenza, Carlo. 1997. Proper names specific aphasias. In & (eds.), Anomia: Neuroanatomical and Cognitive Correlates. New York: Academic Press, 115–34.Google Scholar
& . 1989a. Generating proper names: a case of selective inability. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5: 711–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& . 1989b. Evidence from aphasia for the role of proper names as pure referring expressions. Nature 342: 678–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1780. A General Dictionary of the English Language. London: J. Dodsley, C. Dilly & J. Wilkie.Google Scholar
Shuman, R. B. 1985. English language in the secondary school. In (ed.), The English Language Today. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 314–26.Google Scholar
1995. How to get a laugh in Fijian: code-switching and humour. Language in Society 24: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1956. English Place-Name Elements, 2 vols. (EPNS vols. 25, 26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1957. Latin influence on English syntax; a survey with a bibliography. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 16: 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1971, Studies in the prosaic vocabulary of Old English verse. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 72: 385–418.Google Scholar
Statistical abstract of the United States. 2001. http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-us.html
1967. Names on the Land: a Historical Account of Place-Naming in the United States, 3rd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
1979. American Given Names, their Origin and History in the Context of the English Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. & D. Minkova. 1988. The English vowel shift: problems of coherence and explanation. In Kastovsky & Bauer (eds.), 395–410.
1964. The educational revolution in England 1560–1640. Past and Present 28: 41–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1969. Literacy and education in England 1640–1900. Past and Present 42: 69–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (eds.). 1990. Dictionary of Newfoundland English, 2nd edn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Digital version at <www.heritage.nf.ca/dictionary>.Google Scholar
. 1939. Old English Personal Names in Bede's History (Lund Studies in English 8). Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
. 1997. Middle English Words for ‘Town’: a Study of Changes in a Semantic Field (Gothenburg Studies in English 70). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
. 1876. Dialects and prehistoric forms of Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 16: 543–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & . 2000. Surnames and the Y chromosome. American Journal of Human Genetics 66: 1417–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, & (eds.). 1999. Writing in Nonstandard English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2000. On the development of transitive expletive constructions in the history of English. Lingua 110: 473–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. & W. van der Wurff (eds.). 2005. Aspects of OV and VO Word Order in the History of English. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics.
. 1940. A Contribution to the Study of Genitival Composition in Old English Place-Names (Nomina Germanica 7). Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alan R. 1994. English in Wales. In Burchfield (ed.), 94–147.
& . 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. A. 1995. The iconicity of ‘dative shift’ in English: considerations from information flow in discourse. In (ed.), Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: the Human Dimension (Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 9). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 155–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A. 1988. A discourse approach to the cross-linguistic category ‘adjective’. In (ed.), Explaining Language Universals. Oxford: Blackwell, 168–85.Google Scholar
1982. Double negation and eighteenth-century English grammars. Neophilologus 66: 278–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. ‘I will be drowned and no man shall save me’: the conventional rules for shall and will in eighteenth-century English grammars. English Studies 66: 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 1996a. Social network theory and eighteenth-century English: the case of Boswell. In Britton (ed.), 327–37.CrossRef
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 1998. Standardization of English spelling: the eighteenth-century printers' contribution. In & (eds.), English Historical Linguistics 1996. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 457–470.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 2000. Normative studies in England. In , , & (eds.), History of the Language Sciences. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 876–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. The Correspondence of Robert Dodsley 1733–1764. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002. Language and History in Viking Age England: Linguistic Relations between Speakers of Old Norse and Old English (Studies in the Early Middle Ages 6). Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. 1992. Syntax. In Hogg (ed.), 168–289.
(ed.). 2000. The Celtic EnglishesII (Anglistische Forschungen 286). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2003. The Celtic EnglishesIII (Anglistische Forschungen 324). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1999a. Standard English: what it isn't. In & (eds.), Standard English: the Widening Debate. London and New York: Routledge, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& . 1994. International English: a Guide to Varieties of Standard English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Uchida, M. 2002. From participles to conjunctions: a parallel corpus study of grammaticalization in English and French. In , & (eds.), English Corpus Linguistics in Japan. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 131–46.Google Scholar
Ukaji, M. 1992. ‘I not say’: bridge phenomenon in syntactic change. In Rissanen et al. (eds.), 453–62.
University of Michigan. 2001. http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/frames/sttranfr.html
& . 1990. Preserved comprehension of proper names in global aphasia. Brain and Language 39: 511–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, T. 2001. Atlantis Semitica: structural contact features in Celtic and English. In (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1999: Selected Papers from the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, 9–13 August 1999 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 215). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 350–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victorians. 2001. http://www.thesite.org/victorians/communications/the/postal/service.html
1790–1. A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language. London: G. G. J. & J. Robinson.Google Scholar
1653. Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. Oxford. Repr. in facsimile by R. C. Alston, 1974, English Linguistics 1500–1800 (English Linguistics 142). London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Wallmannsberger, J. 1988. The ‘creole hypothesis’ in the history of English. In (ed.), Historical English: on the Occasion of Karl Brunner's 100th Birthday (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft, Anglistische Reihe 1). Innsbruck: Institut für Anglistik, Universität Innsbruck, 19–36.Google Scholar
1980. Changes in the geographical distribution of the recruitment of apprentices to the London companies 1486–1750. Journal of Historical Geography 6: 241–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. English Auxiliaries. Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. 1997. The structure of parametric change and V-movement in the history of English. In van Kemenade & Vincent (eds.), 380–93.
2002. A Dictionary of County Durham Place-Names. Nottingham: English Place-Name Society.Google Scholar
2004. Cambridge Dictionary of English Place-Names. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, et al. 2002. Y chromosome evidence for Anglo-Saxon mass migration. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 1008–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
. 1789. Dissertations on the English Language. Boston. Facsimile edn. Menston: Scolar Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Webster, Noah. 1807. A Philosophical and Practical Grammar of the English Language.
. 1828. An American Dictionary of the English Language. New York: S. Converse. Facsimile edn. New York: Johnson Reprint, 1970.Google Scholar
1993. The diachronic consequences of first and second language axcquisition: The change from OV to VO. Linguistics 31: 903–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. Spezifisch anglisches Wortgut in den nordhumbrischen Interlinearglossierungen des Lukasevangeliums (Anglistische Forschungen 132). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
White, D. L. 2002. Explaining the innovations of Middle English: what, where, and why. In Filppula et al. (eds.), 153–74.
. 1870. Words and their Uses, Past and Present: a Study of the English Language. New York: Sheldon & Co.Google Scholar
1975. Origins of the English Language: a Social and Linguistic History. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Roger. 1643. A Key into the Language of America, eds. & . Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
. 1998. The Means of Naming: a Social and Cultural History of Personal Naming in Western Europe. London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1977. Oxford Dictionary of English Christian Names, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. The conversational historical present alternation. Language 55: 168–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank country data. 2003. http://www.worldbank.org/data/databytopic/databytopic.html
& . 1981. The Population History of England, 1541–1871: a Reconstruction (Studies in Social and Demographic History). London: Edward Arnold for the Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure.Google Scholar
1989. A remarkable gap in the history of English syntax. Folia Linguistica Historica 9, 117–59.Google Scholar
Zachrisson, R. E. 1924. The French element. In & (eds.), Introduction to the Survey of English Place-Names (part I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (EPNS vol. 1), 93–114.Google Scholar