Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Image In(ter)ventions
- Filming as Writing, Writing as Filming, Staking One's Life
- Between Wars, Between Images
- Documenting the Life of Ideas? – Farocki and the 'Essay Film'
- Images of the World and the Inscription of War
- Film: Media: Work: Archive
- From the Surveillance Society to the Control Society
- Acknowledgement
- Farocki: A Filmography
- Notes on Contributors
- Index of Names
- Index of Film Titles / Subjects
- Film Culture in Transition General Editor: Thomas Elsaesser
- Plate Section
Making the World Superfluous: An Interview with Harun Farocki
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 January 2021
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Image In(ter)ventions
- Filming as Writing, Writing as Filming, Staking One's Life
- Between Wars, Between Images
- Documenting the Life of Ideas? – Farocki and the 'Essay Film'
- Images of the World and the Inscription of War
- Film: Media: Work: Archive
- From the Surveillance Society to the Control Society
- Acknowledgement
- Farocki: A Filmography
- Notes on Contributors
- Index of Names
- Index of Film Titles / Subjects
- Film Culture in Transition General Editor: Thomas Elsaesser
- Plate Section
Summary
This interview was conducted after a screening of IMAGES OF THEWORLD AND THE INSCRIPTION OF WAR at the National Film Theatre-MOMI London, 6 February 1993.
TE: You have been making films since 1966. I think your filmography numbers some fifty titles. Where have you been all these years? The New German Cinema has come and gone, Fassbinder,Wenders, Herzog – been and gone. How did you manage to survive? How have you been able to create such a body of work, unnoticed by the world?
HF: Not entirely unnoticed. I’m probably the best known unknown filmmaker in Germany. Hartmut Bitomsky is another filmmaker in the same position, a well-known, unknown filmmaker in Germany. He and I started making films together, after leaving the Berlin Film Academy in 1969. During those years a lot of things were possible, or so it seemed to us. Kluge was successful in the cinema, and Hellmuth Costard's work was shown on prime-time television. There was a short boom for political films in West Germany, and for a brief summer we had the possibility of producing this kind of films, and before we knew it the fashion was over. I think we didn't take advantage of our opportunity all that wisely, and with the start of the 1970s, it was all over. Take Wim Wenders, he gave up his long takes, began to work with shot-countershots and made himself socially acceptable. But we didn't manage the crossover, and it seems that anyone who failed to adapt at that point, stayed out in the cold for a long time. I tried to get by, by gettingmywork into arts programmes or on children's television, but it was by no means always a done deal. And in any case, there is not much public attention to be gained from those kinds of assignments. Working for television, a documentarist like Peter Nestler attracted precious little attention, and today, not even the Straubs can provoke a reaction, always assuming that their films are being shown at all.
TE: Was it a deliberate move on your part to more or less bypass the subsidy system as it existed in Germany during the 1970s?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Harun FarockiWorking on the Sightlines, pp. 177 - 190Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2004