Book contents
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques, Second Edition
- Reviews
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Medical Image Perception
- Part I Historical Reflections and Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Science of Image Perception
- Part III Perception Metrology
- Part IV Clinical Performance Assessment
- Part V Computational Perception
- Part VI Applied Perception
- 28 Optimization of 2D and 3D Radiographic Imaging Systems
- 29 Display Optimization from a Physics Perspective
- 30 Display Optimization from a Perception Perspective
- 31 Perception and Training
- 32 Ergonomics 2.0: Fatigue in Medical Imaging
- 33 Perception Issues in Pathology
- 34 Medical Image Perception from a Clinical Perspective
- 35 Future of Medical Image Perception
- Index
- References
34 - Medical Image Perception from a Clinical Perspective
from Part VI - Applied Perception
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2018
Book contents
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques, Second Edition
- Reviews
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Medical Image Perception
- Part I Historical Reflections and Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Science of Image Perception
- Part III Perception Metrology
- Part IV Clinical Performance Assessment
- Part V Computational Perception
- Part VI Applied Perception
- 28 Optimization of 2D and 3D Radiographic Imaging Systems
- 29 Display Optimization from a Physics Perspective
- 30 Display Optimization from a Perception Perspective
- 31 Perception and Training
- 32 Ergonomics 2.0: Fatigue in Medical Imaging
- 33 Perception Issues in Pathology
- 34 Medical Image Perception from a Clinical Perspective
- 35 Future of Medical Image Perception
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques , pp. 506 - 512Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bashshur, R.L., Krupinski, E.A., Thrall, J.H., Bashshur, N. (2016). The empirical foundations of teleradiology and related applications: a review of the evidence. Telemed J eHealth, 22, 868–898.Google Scholar
Drew, T., Vo, M.L., Olwal, A., Jacobson, F., Seltzer, S.E., Wolfe, J.M. (2013). Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images. J Vision, 13, 3.Google Scholar
Evans, K., Birdwell, R.L., Wolfe, J.M. (2013). If you don’t find it often, you often don’t find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening. PLoS One, 8, e64366.Google Scholar
Gallagher, A., Bowden, L., Faulkner, R., et al. (2016). “The times they are a changing” for quality assurance testing in diagnostic radiology. Eur J Med Phys, 32, 426.Google Scholar
Gilbert, F.J., Tucker, L., Young, K.C. (2016). Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool. Clin Radiol, 71, 141–150.Google Scholar
Holzman, D.C. (2010). What’s in a color? The unique human health effects of blue light. Environ Health Perspect, 118, A22–A27.Google Scholar
Jacobson, F.L., Berlanstein, B.P., Andriole, K.P. (2006). Paradigms of perception in clinical practice. J Am Coll Radiol, 3, 441–445.Google Scholar
Krupinski, E.A., Berbaum, K.S. (2000). The Medical Image Perception Society update on key issues for image perception research. Radiology, 253, 230–233.Google Scholar
Lowe, A.S., Kay, C.L. (2014). Recent developments in CT: a review of the clinical applications and advantages of multidetector computed tomography. Imaging, 18, 62–67.Google Scholar
Mallet, S., Phillips, P., Fanshawe, T.R., Helbren, E., et al. (2014). Tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal three-dimensional CT colonography: visual perception of experienced and inexperienced readers. Radiology, 273, 783–792.Google Scholar
Mammography Quality Standards Act. (1992). Available at: www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandards ActandProgram/ (accessed November 8, 2017).Google Scholar
Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015. (2015). Available at: www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/macra_health_it_fact_sheet_final.pdf (accessed November 8, 2017).Google Scholar
Mettler, F.A., Bhargavan, M., Faulkner, K., Gilley, D.B., Gray, J.E., Ibbott, G.S. et al. (2009). Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources – 1950–2007. Radiology, 253, 520–531Google Scholar
Pinto, A., Brunese, L. (2010). Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology. World J Radiol, 2, 377–383.Google Scholar
Reicher, M., Wolfe, J.M. (2016). Let’s use cognitive science to create collaborative workstations. J Am Coll Radiol, 13, 571–575.Google Scholar
Seltzer, S.E., Judy, P.F., Adams, D.F., Jacobson, F.L., Stark, P., Kikinis, R., Swensson, R.G., et al. (1995). Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing. Radiology, 197, 73–78.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.M.K., Banerjee, A.K. (2013). The History of Radiology. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
US Preventive Services Task Force. (2016). Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 315, 2564–2575.Google Scholar