Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgments
- 1 The money debate and American political development
- 2 Party politics and the financial debate, 1865–1896
- 3 Greenbacks versus gold: The contest over finance in the 1870s
- 4 The “people's money”: Greenbackism in North Carolina, Illinois, and Massachusetts
- 5 The battle of the standards: The financial debate of the 1890s
- 6 Populism and the politics of finance in North Carolina, Illinois, and Massachusetts in the 1890s
- 7 Money, history, and American political development
- Appendix A Financial terms used between the Civil War and 1896
- Appendix B Major banking and currency legislation, 1860 to 1900
- Appendix C An antimonopolist reading of L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz
- Index
Preface and acknowledgments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgments
- 1 The money debate and American political development
- 2 Party politics and the financial debate, 1865–1896
- 3 Greenbacks versus gold: The contest over finance in the 1870s
- 4 The “people's money”: Greenbackism in North Carolina, Illinois, and Massachusetts
- 5 The battle of the standards: The financial debate of the 1890s
- 6 Populism and the politics of finance in North Carolina, Illinois, and Massachusetts in the 1890s
- 7 Money, history, and American political development
- Appendix A Financial terms used between the Civil War and 1896
- Appendix B Major banking and currency legislation, 1860 to 1900
- Appendix C An antimonopolist reading of L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz
- Index
Summary
What are the possibilities for democratic change in the United States? This is the question that led me to write this book. To answer it, I examined efforts to regulate economic existence. I was interested in the political governance of the conditions of production, the distribution of wealth, the availability of economic opportunity, and the rights of workers. In these and other areas of economic life, the range of political options available to a society, and the extent to which those options provide for the autonomy and well-being of the population, are useful measures of democracy.
In the late nineteenth century, a series of farmer-labor parties promoted a political program that would change the governance of economic life. Their interest in economic issues stemmed from the belief that the preservation of economic opportunity was essential for meaningful democracy. These were the antimonopolists, and they included the Greenbackers, the Knights of Labor, and the Populists, among others. When I first became acquainted with the antimonopolists, I was struck by the depth and persistence of this tradition. These groups fielded candidates and participated in national debates on economic issues in every major election during the 1870s, 1880s, and 1890s.
Other scholars have noted the significance of the farmer-labor tradition in the late nineteenth century, when the United States was undergoing a transition from a primarily agrarian economy to a primarily industrial economy.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Goldbugs and GreenbacksThe Antimonopoly Tradition and the Politics of Finance in America, 1865–1896, pp. ix - xiiPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1997