Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Origins of DRGs in the United States: A technical, political and cultural story
- 2 Casemix in the United Kingdom: From development to plans
- 3 Casemix implementation in Portugal
- 4 From naïve hope to realistic conviction: DRGs in Sweden
- 5 Casemix in Denmark
- 6 DRGs in France
- 7 Introduction and use of DRGs in Belgium
- 8 DRGs in Germany: Introduction of a comprehensive, prospective DRG payment system by 2009
- 9 Casemix in Switzerland
- 10 The first decade of casemix in Italy
- 11 Casemix development and implementation in Australia
- 12 Diagnosis procedure combination: The Japanese approach to casemix
- 13 Casemix in Singapore
- 14 Experiences with the application of the DRG principle in Hungary
- 15 Casemix systems – past, present, and future: The Canadian experience
- 16 Conclusions: The global diffusion of casemix
- Index
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Origins of DRGs in the United States: A technical, political and cultural story
- 2 Casemix in the United Kingdom: From development to plans
- 3 Casemix implementation in Portugal
- 4 From naïve hope to realistic conviction: DRGs in Sweden
- 5 Casemix in Denmark
- 6 DRGs in France
- 7 Introduction and use of DRGs in Belgium
- 8 DRGs in Germany: Introduction of a comprehensive, prospective DRG payment system by 2009
- 9 Casemix in Switzerland
- 10 The first decade of casemix in Italy
- 11 Casemix development and implementation in Australia
- 12 Diagnosis procedure combination: The Japanese approach to casemix
- 13 Casemix in Singapore
- 14 Experiences with the application of the DRG principle in Hungary
- 15 Casemix systems – past, present, and future: The Canadian experience
- 16 Conclusions: The global diffusion of casemix
- Index
Summary
On April 1, 1983, the first patient classification system (PSC) to be used for paying hospitals for the services they provided was adopted by the US Congress. For the first time, a payer – in this case Medicare – had a way of comparing the outputs of one hospital with those of another and a basis for paying hospitals in a standardized fashion for the “products” they produced.
This system, known as Diagnosis-Related Groups, (DRGs) was developed by a team of researchers at Yale University under the direction of Robert Fetter and John Thompson and sparked a revolution in the health care sector in the United States. At a moment in time when there was increasing concern in Congress and elsewhere about the rapid rise of costs in health care, hospitals could no longer justify higher costs simply by asserting their patients were sicker than anyone else's. By classifying patients according to the resource consumption patterns that were typically associated with particular diagnoses, the DRG case-based system promised to introduce both transparency and operational efficiency into a production process that had previously been largely opaque.
The US, however, was not the only country struggling with increasing costs in health care in the 1980s. A number of other countries, particularly in Western Europe, were experiencing similar increases and were in the hunt for solutions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
- 1
- Cited by