Book contents
- The Global Regime for the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
- The Global Regime for the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Detailed Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Foundations of Intellectual Property Enforcement
- Part II The International Architecture for the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
- Part III Civil Enforcement
- Part IV Border Measures
- Part V Criminal Enforcement
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2017
Book contents
- The Global Regime for the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
- The Global Regime for the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Detailed Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Foundations of Intellectual Property Enforcement
- Part II The International Architecture for the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights
- Part III Civil Enforcement
- Part IV Border Measures
- Part V Criminal Enforcement
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Primary Sources
GATT (1987a) Guidelines Proposed by the European Community for the Negotiation on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. MTN.GNG/NG11/W/16Google Scholar
GATT (1987b) Statement by the United States at Meeting of 25 March 1987. MTN.GNG/NG11/W/2Google Scholar
GATT (1987c) Submissions from Participants on Trade Problems Encountered in Connection with Intellectual Property rights, European Communities, Japan, United States. MTN.GNG/NG11/W/7Google Scholar
GATT (1988a) Statement by Thailand at the Meeting of 12–14 September 1988. MTN.GNG/NG11/W/27Google Scholar
GATT (1989) Enforcement of Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights – Communication from India. MTN.GNG/NG11/W/40Google Scholar
International Law Commission (2001a) Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentariesGoogle Scholar
International Law Commission (2001b) Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. Supplement no. 10 (A/56/10), chp.IV.E.1Google Scholar
International Law Commission (2006a) Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. United NationsGoogle Scholar
International Law Commission (2006b) Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, Finalized by Martti Koskenniemi. A/CN.4/L.682Google Scholar
OECD (2009) Magnitude of Counterfeiting and Piracy of Tangible Products: An Update. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1990) General Comment no. 3, The Nature of States Parties’ Obligations (Art. 2, Para. 1, of the Covenant). E/1991/23Google Scholar
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1998) General Comment no. 9, Substantive Issues Arising in the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. E/C.12/1998/24Google Scholar
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2000) General Comment no. 14, The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health. E/C.12/2000/4Google Scholar
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2001) Human Rights and Intellectual Property, Statement by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. E/C.12/2001/15Google Scholar
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2006) General Comment no. 17 (2005), The right of Everyone to Benefit from the Protection of the Moral and Material Interests Resulting from any Scientific, Literary or Artistic Production of Which He or She is the Author (Article 15, Paragraph 1 (c), of the Covenant). E/C.12/GC/17Google Scholar
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2010a) E/C.12/2010/SR.3, 4 and 5Google Scholar
UN Economic and Social Council (1995) The Interpretation and Practical Application of the Obligations Incumbent upon States Parties to the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights. E/C.12/1995/SR.22Google Scholar
UN ECOSOC Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (2001) The Impact of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights on Human Rights: Report of the High Commissioner. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/13Google Scholar
UN General Assembly (1982) Manila Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes. A/RES/37/10Google Scholar
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (2001) Access to Medication in the Context of Pandemics such as HIV/AIDS. E/CN.4/RES/2001/33Google Scholar
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (2002) Access to Medication in the Context of Pandemics such as HIV/AIDS. E/CN.4/RES/2002/32Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Committee (1988) General comment no. 16, Article 17 (Right to Privacy) The Right to Respect of Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence, and Protection of Honour and Reputation. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9, Vol. IGoogle Scholar
UN Human Rights Committee (2001) General comment no. 29, States of Emergency (Article 4). CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Committee (2004) General Comment no. 31, The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Committee (2007) General comment no. 32, Article 14, Right to Equality before Courts and Tribunals and to Fair Trial. CCPR/C/GC/32Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Committee (2011) General comment no. 34, Article 19, Freedom of Opinion and Expression. CCPR/C/GC/34Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council (2007) Implementation of General Assembly Resolution 60/251 of 15 March 2006 Entitled ‘Human Rights Council’, Human Rights and International Solidarity. A/HRC/4/8Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council (2009) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, Anand Grover. A/HRC/11/12Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council (2011) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Frank La Rue. A/HRC/17/27Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council (2012) The Promotion, Protection and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet. A/HRC/RES/20/8Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council (2013) Access to Medicines in the Context of the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health. A/HRC/RES/23/14Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council (2014) Report of the Special Rapporteur in the Field of Cultural Rights, Farida Shaheed, Copyright Policy and the Right to Science and Culture. A/HRC/28/57Google Scholar
UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (2000) Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights. E/CN.4/SUB.2/RES/2000/7Google Scholar
UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (2001) Intellectual Property and Human Rights. E/CN/4/SUB.2/RES/2001/21Google Scholar
UNCTAD – Stockholm Network – PIIPA (2007) Defining the Public Interest in Intellectual Property. http://unctad.org/sections/dite_totip/docs/dite_pcbb_ias0051_en.pdf (last accessed December 2015)Google Scholar
UNCTAD-ICTSD (2005) Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
UNSG High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines (2015) Terms of Reference. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/562094dee4b0d00c1a3ef761/t/568d535a1c12106651299f6e/1452102490740/TOR+on+new+template+5Jan16+FINAL.pdf (last accessed May 2016)Google Scholar
WHO (2006) Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights, Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health. www.who.int/intellectualproperty/documents/thereport/ENPublicHealthReport.pdf (last accessed November 2016)Google Scholar
WHO (2014) General Information on Counterfeit Medicines. www.who.int/medicines/services/counterfeit/overview/en/ (last accessed September 2015)Google Scholar
WIPO (1987) Comité de Expertos sobre la armonización de ciertas disposiciones de leyes para la protección de las invenciones, Exclusiones de la protección por patente. Memorándum de la Oficina Internacional de la OMPI. HL/CE/IV/INF/1Google Scholar
WIPO (1997) Proposed Treaty on the Settlement of Disputes between States in the Field of Intellectual Property. WO/GA/XXI/2Google Scholar
WIPO (2003) Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO and Glossary of Copyright and Related Rights Terms. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), GenevaGoogle Scholar
WIPO (2nd ed.) (2004) WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), GenevaGoogle Scholar
WIPO (2007b) Human health and the IP system: Innovation, access and public welfare. WIPO Symposium on Current Issues in Intellectual Property and Public Health. www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/policy/en/global_health/pdf/public_health_ip.pdf (last accessed June 2015)Google Scholar
WIPO (2007c) Study on the Economic, Social and Cultural Impact of Intellectual Property in the Creative IndustriesGoogle Scholar
WIPO (2012) Guide on Surveying the Economic Contribution of the Copyright-Based Industries. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), GenevaGoogle Scholar
WIPO (2013) WIPO Draft Guidelines on Assessing the Economic, Social and Cultural Impact of Copyright on the Creative EconomyGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2001) Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 2002. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
World Customs Organization (2003) Model Provisions for National Legislation to Implement Fair and Effective Border Measures Consistent with the TRIPS Agreement. www.tafa-r.org.tw/forum/20110816/20110816WCOModelLawfinal.pdfwww.tafa-r.org.tw/forum/20110816/20110816WCOModelLawfinal.pdf (last accessed June 2015)Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2001) Globalization, TRIPS and Access to Pharmaceuticals. WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines no. 003Google Scholar
WTO (1995) Analytical index of the GATT. WTO, Geneva. www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gatt_ai_e/art5_e.pdfGoogle Scholar
WTO (2001) Article 5 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, Communication from the Director-General. WT/DSB/25Google Scholar
WTO (2010a) European Union and a Member State – Seizure of Generic Drugs in Transit, Request for consultations by Brazil. WT/DS409/4Google Scholar
WTO (2010b) European Union and a Member State – Seizure of Generic Drugs in Transit, Request for consultations by India. WT/DS408/1, G/L/921, IP/D/28Google Scholar
WTO (2010c) European Union and a Member State – Seizure of Generic Drugs in Transit, Request for consultations by Brazil. WT/DS409/1, IP/D/29, G/L/922Google Scholar
WTO Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1995a) Procedures for Notification of, and Possible Establishment of a Common Register of National Laws and Regulations under Article 63.2. IP/C/2Google Scholar
WTO Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1995b) Format for Listing of ‘Other Laws and Regulations’ to be Notified under Article 63.2. IP/C/W/8/Rev.1Google Scholar
WTO Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1995c) Checklist of Issues on Enforcement. IP/C/5Google Scholar
WTO Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1997) Notifications of Laws and Regulations Relating to Articles 3, 4 and 5 of the TRIPS Agreement: Format for One Option. IP/C/9Google Scholar
WTO Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (2006) Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. Joint Communication from the European Communities, Japan, Switzerland and the United States. IP/C/W/485Google Scholar
WTO Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (2010) Minutes of Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 8–9 June 2010. IP/C/M/63Google Scholar
WTO General Council (2002a) Decision on the Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration. IP/C/W/405Google Scholar
WTO General Council (2002b) Request for Mediation by the Philippines, Thailand, and The European Communities, Communication from the Director-General. WT/GC/66Google Scholar
WTO General Council (2003) Implementation of paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, Decision 30 August 2003. WT/L/540Google Scholar
WTO General Council (2005) Amendment of the TRIPS Agreement, Decision of 6 December 2005. WT/L/641Google Scholar
WTO General Council (2008) Intervention by Brazil, TRIPS Council Agenda Item M (Other Business), Public Health Dimension of the TRIPS Agreement. www.ip-watch.org/files/RemediosIntervencao-do-Brasil-Conselho%20Geral-03%2002%202008.doc (last accessed June 2015)Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Commission of the European Communities (2005a) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee on a Customs Response to Latest Trends in Counterfeiting and Piracy. COM(2005) 479Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2005b) Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, {SEC(2005)848} /COM/2005/0276 final, COD 2005/0127Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2006) Explanatory Memorandum of the Amended Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights of 26 April 2006, COM(2006) 168 finalGoogle Scholar
Committee on Legal Affairs (2014) Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (recast). COM(2013)0162 – C7-0088/2013 – 2013/0089(COD)Google Scholar
Directorate General Internal Market and Services (2013) Synthesis of the responses ‘Civil enforcement of intellectual property rights: public consultation on the efficiency of proceedings and accessibility of measures’. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2012/intellectual-property-rights/summary-of-responses_en.pdf (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union (TAXUD) (2014) A serious problem for everyone. http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_controls/counterfeit_piracy/combating/index_en.htm (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
European Commission (1998) Report from the Commission on the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 3295/94 of 22 December 1994 as regards border controls on trade in goods which may be counterfeit or pirated, and Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) amending Regulation (EC) No 3295/94 laying down measures to prohibit the release for free circulation, export, re-export or entry for a suspensive procedure of counterfeit and pirated goods. COM(1998) 25 final, OJ C 108/63Google Scholar
European Commission (2003a) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Measures and Procedures to Ensure the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. COM(2003) 46 finalGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2003b) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (Rome II). COM(2003) 427 finalGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2005a) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee on a Customs Response to Latest Trends in Counterfeiting and Piracy. COM(2005) 479Google Scholar
European Commission (2005b) Strategy for the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Third Countries. OJEU C 129/3Google Scholar
European Commission (2008) The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: Fact Sheet. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2008/october/tradoc_140836.11.08.pdf (last accessed August 2015)Google Scholar
European Commission (2009a) Commission Staff Working Document, IPR Enforcement Report 2009. SEC(2009) 1360. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/october/tradoc_145204.pdf (last accessed May 2015)Google Scholar
European Commission (2009b) The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): Fact sheet. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/january/tradoc_142039.pdf (last accessed June 2015)Google Scholar
European Commission (2010a) Commission Staff Working Document, Analysis of the application of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the Member States Accompanying document to the Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Social Committee on the application of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights. SEC(2010) 1589 finalGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2010b) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Application of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. COM(2010) 779 finalGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2012) Commission Staff Working Document, Online services, Including e-commerce, in the Single Market. SEC(2011) 1641 finalGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2013a) Commission Staff Working Document, Report on the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Third Countries. SWD(2013) 30 final. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/march/tradoc_150789.pdf (last accessed May 2015)Google Scholar
European Commission (2013b) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No. 207/2009 on the Community trade mark. COM(2013) 161 final, 2013/0088 (COD)Google Scholar
European Commission (2014) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee, Trade, Growth and Intellectual Property – Strategy for the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Third Countries. COM(2014) 389 finalGoogle Scholar
European Parliament (2007a) Legislative resolution of 25 April 2007 on the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights (COM(2006)0168 – C6-0233/2005 – 2005/0127(COD)). P6_TA(2007)0145Google Scholar
European Parliament (2007b) Report on the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights (COM(2006)0168 – C6-0233/2005 – 2005/0127(COD)). A6–0073/2007Google Scholar
European Parliament (2012a) ACTA before the European Parliament, press release of 4 July 2012. www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20120703IPR48247/European-Parliament-rejects-ACTA (last accessed May 2015)Google Scholar
European Parliament (2012b) Legislative resolution of 4 July 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the United Mexican States, the Kingdom of Morocco, New Zealand, the Republic of Singapore, the Swiss Confederation and the United States of America (12195/2011 – C7-0027/2012 – 2011/0167(NLE)). P7_TA-PROV(2012)0287Google Scholar
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and Council of Europe (2016) Handbook on European Law Relating to Access to Justice. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
European Union Subcommittee of the International Trademark Association (2010) Task Force on Criminal Sanctions of the Anti-Counterfeiting and Enforcement Committee (ACEC) Criminal prosecution of counterfeiting and piracy in Member States of the European Union. www.inta.org/Advocacy/Documents/INTAEUCriminalSanctions20082009.pdf (last accessed September 2015)Google Scholar
American Association of Law Libraries et al. (2010) Concerns with April 2010 ACTA text. www.librarycopyrightalliance.org/storage/documents/consolidatedtextcomments423.pdf (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Committee on Armed Services United States Senate (2012) Inquiry into the Counterfeit Electronic Parts in the Department of Defense Supply Chain. Report 112–167. www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Counterfeit-Electronic-Parts.pdf (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Economics and Statistics Administration and United States Patent and Trademark Office (2012) Intellectual Property and the US Economy: Industries in Focus. www.uspto.gov/news/publications/IP_Report_March_2012.pdf (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Industry Functional Advisory Committee on Intellectual Property Rights for Trade Policy Matters (2004) The US-Central American Free Trade Agreement (FTA), The Intellectual Property Provisions, Report of the Industry Functional Advisory Committee on Intellectual Property Rights for Trade Policy Matters (IFAC-3). www.ustr.gov/archive/assets/Trade_Agreements/Regional/CAFTA/CAFTA_Reports/asset_upload_file571_5945.pdf (last accessed May 2015)Google Scholar
Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (2012) 2011 US Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator Annual Report on Intellectual Property Enforcement. www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/IPEC/ipec_annual_2011_report.pdf (last accessed May 2015)Google Scholar
Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (2013) 2013 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement. www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/IPEC/2013-us-ipec-joint-strategic-plan.pdf (accessed May 2015)Google Scholar
Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) (2008) Trade Facts: The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. https://ustr.gov/archive/assets/Document_Library/Fact_Sheets/2008/asset_upload_file760_15084.pdf (last accessed August 2015)Google Scholar
United States Copyright Office (1998) The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf (last accessed June 2016)Google Scholar
United States Trade Representative (2014) 2014 Special 301 Report. www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/USTR%202014%20Special%20301%20Report%20to%20Congress%20FINAL.pdf (last accessed May 2015)Google Scholar
US Customs and Border Protection Office of International Trade (2012) Intellectual Property Rights – Fiscal Year 2011 Seizure Statistics, Prepared by CBP Office of International Trade. Washington DC US Customs and Border Protection and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. www.ice.gov/doclib/iprcenter/pdf/ipr-fy-2011-seizure-report.pdf (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
US Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2010) Intellectual Property: Observations on Efforts to Quantify the Economic Effects of Counterfeit and Pirated Goods. GAO Report 10–423. www.gao.gov/new.items/d10423.pdf (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Allen Consulting Group (2003) Counterfeiting of Toys, Business Software and Computer and Video Games. Report to the Australian Toy Association, the Business Software Association of Australia and the Interactive Entertainment Association of Australia, SydneyGoogle Scholar
Irish Law Reform Commission (2000) Report on Aggravated, Exemplary and Restitutionary Damages. LRC 60–2000Google Scholar
European Patent Office (EPO) and the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (2013) Intellectual Property Rights Intensive Industries: Contribution to Economic Performance and Employment in the European Union. Industry-Level Analysis ReportGoogle Scholar
OECD and EUIPO (2016) Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods. Mapping the economic impact. OECD and EUIPO, ParisGoogle Scholar
AIM (2014) Comments on transit controls of goods suspected of infringing IPRs. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Alliance against IP Theft (2005) Comments on the European Commission’s proposal for a Directive on criminal measures (on file with author)Google Scholar
Centre for Economics and Business Research (2000) The economic impact of counterfeiting in selected industries of the EU economy. CEBR, London (on file with author)Google Scholar
Chartered Institute of Patent Agents (2005) Preliminary Comments on the proposed Directive on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights and the Council Framework Decision on measures to strengthen the criminal law framework to combat intellectual property offencesGoogle Scholar
Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002) Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. LondonGoogle Scholar
The Economist (2005) BSA or Just BS. Software Theft Is Bad; So Is Misstating the Evidence. www.economist.com/node/3993427 (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
European Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association (EGA) (2006) Amended Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (on file with author)Google Scholar
Europe Economics (2008) Jobs, Tax and Contribution to the UK Economy: The Impacts of Reducing Illicit Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing. www.europe-economics.com/publications/fileshare08.pdf (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Frontier Economics (2011) Estimating the Global Economic and Social Impacts of Counterfeiting and Piracy. Report Commissioned by Business Action to Stop Counterfeiting and Piracy. www.iccwbo.org/Advocacy-Codes-and-Rules/BASCAP/BASCAP-Research/Economic-impact/Global-Impacts-Study/ (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Gallup Organization (2007) Global Consumer Awareness, Attitudes, and Opinions on Counterfeiting and Piracy. Third Global Congress Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy, Geneva. www.ccapcongress.net/archives/Geneva/Files/Stewart.pdf (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
International Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition (2005) The Negative Consequences of International Intellectual Property Theft: Economic Harm, Threats to the Public Health and Safety, and Links to Organized Crime and Terrorist Organizations. White Paper (on file with authors)Google Scholar
International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting Taskforce (IMPACT) (2011) Facts, activities, documents developed by the Assembly and the Working Groups 2006–2010. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s20967en/s20967en.pdf (last accessed September 2015)Google Scholar
International Trademark Association (1998) The Economic Impact of Trademark Counterfeiting and Infringement. Estimation of the Impact of Trademark Counterfeiting and Infringement on Worldwide Sales of Apparel and Footwear. www.inta.org/Advocacy/Documents/INTACounterfeitingEconomicImpact1998.pdf (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
INTERPOL (2011) Global Operation Strikes at Online Supply of Illegal and Counterfeit Medicines Worldwide. www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News-media-releases/2011/PR081 (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Ip-health (2009) Intervention by European Communities at the TRIPS Council (Dutch seizures) (on file with author)Google Scholar
Knowledge Ecology International (2009) Statement by Brazil at TRIPS Council: Public health dimension of TRIPS Agreement. http://keionline.org/blogs/2009/03/04/brazilian-intervention-at-trips-council (last accessed June 2015)Google Scholar
Knowledge Ecology International (2012) Welcome Trust tells WHO it opposes R&D Treaty and the de-linkage of R&D costs from drug prices. http://keionline.org/node/1608 (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Médecins Sans Frontières (2014) Civil Society letter regarding proposed rules for EU trademark legislation. www.msfaccess.org/content/civil-society-letter-regarding-proposed-rules-eu-trademark-legislation (last accessed June 2015)Google Scholar
Motion Picture Association of America (2006) Worldwide Study of Losses to the Film Industry and International Economies Due to Piracy. Industry Report. www.iccwbo.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2147491008 (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Netcoalition-CCIA (eds.) (2010) Response of Netcoalition and the Computer & Communications Industry Association to the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator’s Request for Comments on the Joint Strategic Plan (on file with author)Google Scholar
TERA Consultants (2010) Building a Digital Economy: The Importance of Saving Jobs in the EU’s Creative Industries. www.iccwbo.org/Advocacy-Codes-and-Rules/BASCAP/BASCAP-Research/Economic-impact/Building-a-Digital-Economy-TERA-study (last accessed April 2015)Google Scholar
Trade – Human Rights – Equitable Economy (3D) (2009) Seeds of hunger: Intellectual property rights on seeds and the human rights responseGoogle Scholar