Book contents
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction and Overview
- Part I Gendered Justice
- Part II Gender on Trial
- 9 Commentary on State v. Williams
- 10 Commentary on State v. Walden
- 11 Commentary on State v. Norman
- 12 Commentary on Whitner v. State
- 13 Commentary on United States v. Nwoye
- 14 Commentary on Erotic Services Provider Legal Education and Research Project v. Gascon
13 - Commentary on United States v. Nwoye
from Part II - Gender on Trial
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2022
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction and Overview
- Part I Gendered Justice
- Part II Gender on Trial
- 9 Commentary on State v. Williams
- 10 Commentary on State v. Walden
- 11 Commentary on State v. Norman
- 12 Commentary on Whitner v. State
- 13 Commentary on United States v. Nwoye
- 14 Commentary on Erotic Services Provider Legal Education and Research Project v. Gascon
Summary
The case represents one of the few instances where an appellate court considered whether an affirmative defense of duress should be allowed to incorporate evidence of battered person syndrome. The defendant, convicted of conspiring with her boyfriend to extort money from a doctor, testified that her boyfriend coerced her participation through his physically and emotionally abusive behavior. He also pretended to be an FBI agent which allowed the defendant to argue she did not feel reasonably safe in reporting the extortion scheme. Also of note, the case had an unusual procedure history wherein a three-judge panel reversed its prior judgment and the final split opinion was authored by Judge (now Justice) Brett Kavanaugh.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions , pp. 263 - 281Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022