Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Ethics of Nuclear EnergyRisk, Justice, and Democracy in the post-Fukushima Era, pp. 250 - 283Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Adams, J.S. 1965. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Berkowitz, L., 267–99. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ailworth, E. 2013. “Changing Energy Landscape May Save Plymouth Nuclear Plant.” Boston Globe, December 22. www.bostonglobe.com/business/2013/12/22/changing-energy-landscape-may-save-aging-plymouth-nuclear-plant/rGxD6hQwkxlu0xfsmwqshM/story.html?s_campaign=8315.Google Scholar
AkEnd. 2002. “Site Selection Procedure for Repository Sites.” Recommendations of the AkEnd – Committee on a Site Selection Procedure for Repository Sites. Köln: W & S Druck GmbH.Google Scholar
Albert, H. 2013. “Fukushima Report Sheds Light on Future Health Risks.” News Medical, March 6. http://news-medical.net/news/20130306/Fukushima-report-sheds-light-on-future-health-risks.aspx.Google Scholar
Allers, U.S. and O’Brien, W.V., eds. 1961. Christian Ethics and Nuclear Warfare. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Allison, W. 2011. “We Should Stop Running Away from Radiation.” Philosophy and Technology 24: 193–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANS (American Nuclear Society). 2012. Fukushima Daiichi: ANS Committee Report. http://fukushima.ans.org/report/Fukushima_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Anspaugh, L.R. 2007. “Doses to Members of the General Public and Observed Effects on Biota: Chernobyl.” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 96: 13–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anspaugh, L., Catlin, R., and Goldman, M.. 1988. “The Global Impact of the Chernobyl Reactor Accident.” Science 242: 1513–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ardagh, D. 1990. “The Immorality of Nuclear Deterrence.” International Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3): 343–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 2012. The Nicomachean Ethics: Aristotle in Twenty-Three Volumes, Vol. 19, edited by Rackham, H. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, B.W. 2009. The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ashford, N.A. and Caldart, C.C.. 1996. Technology, Law and the Working Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Ashford, N.A. and Caldart, C.C.. 2008. Environmental Law, Policy, and Economics: Reclaiming the Environmental Agenda. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2012. “Protests in Japan as Nuclear Power Plant Reopens.” The Guardian, July 1. www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/01/japan-protest-nuclear-plant-reopens.Google Scholar
Atheensuu, M. and Sandin, P.. 2012. “The Precautionary Principle.” In Handbook of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., and Peterson, M, 961–78. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Attfield, R. 1991. The Ethics of Environmental Concern, 2nd ed. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
.ausgestrahlt. 2013. “56 Prozent der Bevölkerung wollen schnelleren Atomausstieg.” Umfrage von EMNID im Auftrag von.ausgestrahlt. www.ausgestrahlt.de/hintergrundinfos/umfragen/umfrage-schneller-atomausstieg.htmlGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., and Weiber, R.. 2006. Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. 11th ed. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Baggini, J. 2002. Making Sense: Philosophy Behind the Headlines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, P.J. and Hoel, D.G.. 2007. “Meta-analysis of Standardized Incidence and Mortality Rates of Childhood Leukemia in Proximity to Nuclear Facilities.” European Journal of Cancer Care 16 (4): 355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, R.C., Hickenbotham, P., Hatch, T., Kelly, D., Topchiy, N., Almeida, G., Jones, G.G., Johnson, G.E., Parry, J.M., Tothkamm, K., and Dubrova, Y.E.. 2006. “Radiation-Induced Transgenerational Alterations in Genome Stability and DNA Damage.” Oncogene 25 (56): 7336–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkenbus, J.N. 1992. “The Ethics of Nuclear Deterrence: An Introduction.” In Ethics, Nuclear Deterrence and War, edited by Barkenbus, J.N., 1–18. Saint Paul, MN: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Barnosky, A. et al. 2011. “Has the Earth’s Sixth Mass Extinction Already Arrived?” Nature 471: 51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basta, C. 2012. “Risk and Spatial Planning.” In Handbook of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., and Peterson, M., 265–94. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Bauer, M.W., ed. 1995. Resistance to new technology: Nuclear power, information technology and biotechnology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F.. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L. 2003. “The Nature of Applied Ethics.” In A Companion to Applied Ethics, edited by Frey, R.G. and Wellman, C.H., 1–16. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bederman, D.J. 2006. International Law Frameworks, 2nd ed. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Bedford, T. and Cooke, R.. 2001. Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, C.R. 1999. Political Theory and International Relations, with a New Afterword by the Author. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, D. 2004. “Environmental Justice and Rawls’ Difference Principle.” Environmental Ethics 26 (3): 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, J. 1988. The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and the Problem of Domination. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Benschop, Y., Helms-Mills, J., Mills, B., and Tienari, J.. 2012. “Editorial: Gendering Change: The Next Step.” Gender, Work and Organisation 19 (1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresford, N.A., Barnett, C.I., Wright, S.M., and Crout, N.M.. 2008. “Post-Chernobyl Restrictions Still Affecting UK Sheep.” Agra Europe 2203: 2.Google Scholar
Bertell, R. 1991. “Ethics of Nuclear Option in the 1990s.” In Nuclear Energy and Ethics, edited by Shrader-Frechette, K.S., 161–81. Geneva: World Council of Churches Publications.Google Scholar
BFE (Bundesamt für Energie). 2008. “Sectoral Plan Deep Geological Repositories.” Conceptual part. Bern: Swiss Federal Office of Energy.Google Scholar
BFE. 2013. Radioactive waste: Nuclear Installations and Areas for Deep Geological Repositories. Bern: Swiss Federal Office of Energy.Google Scholar
Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., and Simmons, P.. 2008. “Re-framing Nuclear Power in the UK Energy Debate: Nuclear Power, Climate Change Mitigation and Radioactive Waste.” Public Understanding of Science 17: 145–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London/Henley/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bluth, C., Kroenig, M., Lee, R., Sailor, W.C., and Fuhrmann, M.. 2010. “Correspondence: Civilian Nuclear Cooperation and the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” International Security 35 (1): 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, K., and Wheeler, N.J.. 2008. The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation, and Trust in World Politics. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Borchardt, R.W. 2011. “Prioritization of Recommended Actions to be Taken in Response to Fukushima Lessons Learned.” USNRC, October 3.Google Scholar
Bostek, C. vs. Entergy Nuclear Generation Co. 2014. “Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Entergy’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for Lack of Standing,” Land Court Department of Trial Court, March 7. www.capecodbaywatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/06.09.14-Plaintiffs-Memorandum-in-Opposition-to-Entergy-Motion-to-Dismiss-on-Standing.pdf.Google Scholar
Boyle, P. 1997. “Cancer, Cigarette Smoking and Premature Death in Europe: a Review Including the Recommendations of European Cancer Experts Consensus Meeting, Helsinki, October 1996.” Lung Cancer 17 (1):1–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broad, W.J. and Sanger, D.E.. 2014. “U.S. Ramping Up Major Renewal in Nuclear Arms.” The New York Times, September 21. www.nytimes.com/2014/09/22/us/us-ramping-up-major-renewal-in-nuclear-arms.html.Google Scholar
Brockner, J. and Wiesenfeld, B.M.. 1996. “An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reactions to Decisions: Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures.” Psychological Bulletin 120 (2):189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buck, H.J., Gammon, A.R., and Preston, C.J.. 2014. “Gender and Geoengineering.” Hypatia 29 (3): 651–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunn, G. 2006. “The Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime and its History.” In U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy: Confronting Today’s Threats, edited by Bunn, G. and Chyba, C.F., 75–125. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bupp, I.C. and Derian, J.C.. 1978. Light Water: How the Nuclear Dream Dissolved. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Burgherr, P. and Hirschberg, S.. 2008. “A Comparative Analysis of Accident Risks in Fossil, Hydro, and Nuclear Energy Chains.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: an International Journal 14 (5): 947–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, R. and Defeo, O.. 2004. “Long-Term Population Structure, Mortality and Modeling of a Tropical Multi-Fleet Fishery: the Red Grouper Epinephelus Morio of the Campeche Bank, Gulf of Mexico.” Fisheries Research 66: 325–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burn, D.L. 1978. Nuclear Power and the Energy Crisis: Politics and the Atomic Industry. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, C. 2013. “Pentagon Says Pilgrim Among Most Vulnerable Nuke Plants.” Patriot Ledger. Last modified August 17. www.patriotledger.com/article/20130817/News/308179690.Google Scholar
Burrell, C. 2014a. “Pilgrim On List of Degraded Nuclear Power Plants.” Wicked Local Plymouth. Last modified February 4. http://plymouth.wickedlocal.com/article/20140204/NEWS/140208545/0/SEARCH.Google Scholar
Burrell, C. 2014b. “Pilgrim Neighbors in Plymouth Argue Nuclear Plant Depresses Property Values.” The Patriot Ledger. Last modified August 27. www.enterprisenews.com/article/20140827/NEWS/140827360/12153/NEWS.Google Scholar
Butler, C., Parkhill, K.A., and Pidgeon, N.. 2013. “Nuclear Power After 3/11: Looking Back and Thinking Ahead.” In Nuclear Disaster at Fukushima Daiichi: Social, Political and Environmental Issues, edited by Hindmarsh, Richard, 135–53. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, G. 2011. “Fukushima Reaches Cold Shutdown.” Nature. Last modified December 16. www.nature.com/news/fukushima-reaches-cold-shutdown-1.9674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busby, C. and Scott-Cato, M.. 1997. “Death Rates from Leukemia are Higher than Expected in Areas Around Nuclear Sites in Berkshire and Oxfordshire.” British Medical Journal 315: 309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buzan, B., and Hansen, L.. 2009. The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, K., Emanuel, K., Hansen, J., and Wigley, T.. 2013. “Top Climate Scientists Letter to Policy Influencers.” CNN, November 3. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/11/03/world/nuclear-energy-climate-change-scientists-letter/.Google Scholar
Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C.. 1966. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: R. McNally.Google Scholar
Caney, S. 2005. “Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change.” Leiden Journal of International Law 18 (04):747–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardis, E. et al. 2003. Reconstruction of Doses for Chernobyl Liquidators. Atlanta, GA: US Centers for Disease Control and Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).Google Scholar
Chang, R., ed. 1997. Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chernoff, F. 2009. “Defending Foundations for International Relations Theory.” International Theory 1 (3): 466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chistiakov, D.A., Voronova, N.V., and Chistiakov, P.A.. 2008. “Genetic Variations in DNA Repair Genes, Radiosensitivity to Cancer and Susceptibility to Acute Tissue Reactions in Radiotherapy-Treated Cancer Patients.” Acta Oncologica 47 (5): 809–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clapp, R.W., Cobb, S., Chan, C.K., and Walker, B.. 1987. “Leukaemia Near Massachusetts Nuclear Power Plant.” The Lancet 336: 1324–25.Google Scholar
Clapp, R. 2014. “Testimony Presented at the Plymouth District Court.” Boston School of Public Health, March 19.Google Scholar
Clarke, L. 2005. Worst Cases: Terror and Catastrophe in the Popular Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, L. and Perrow, C..1996. “Prosaic Organizational Failure.” American Behavioral Scientist 39 (8): 1040–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R.H. 2003. “Changing Philosophy in ICRP: The Evolution of Protection Ethics and Principles.” International Journal of Low Radiation 1 (1): 39. doi:10.1504/IJLR.2003.003490. www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=3490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R.H. and Valentin, J.. 2009. “The History of ICRP and the Evolution of Its Policies.” Annals of the ICRP 39 (1): 75–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, B.L. 1983. “Breeder Reactors: A Renewable Energy Source.” American Journal of Physics 51 (1): 75–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G.A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99 (4): 906–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltart, C. and Henwood, K.L.. 2012. “On Paternal Subjectivity: A Qualitative and Psychosocial Case Analysis of Men’s Classed Positions and Transitions to First Time Fatherhood.” Qualitative Research 12 (1): 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., and Alkire, S., eds. 2008. The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures, and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton, T. and Kasser, T.. 2009. Meeting Environmental Challenges: The Role of Human Identity. Godalming, Surrey: WWF-UK.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Senate. 1987. “Senate Report No. 2023 of the Joint Special Committee Established for the Purpose of Making an Investigation and Study Relative to The Pilgrim Nuclear Generating Facility at Plymouth.” July. www.nesl.edu/research/Legislative_Council/S2023_pilgrim_nuclear.pdf.Google Scholar
Constant, E. 1999. “Reliable Knowledge and Unreliable Stuff: On the Practical Role of Unreliable Beliefs.” Technology and Culture 40 (2): 324–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M. 2013. “Renaissance in Reverse: Competition Pushes Aging U.S. Nuclear Reactors to the Brink of Economic Abandonment Institute for Energy and the Environment.” Vermont School of Law. Last modified July 18. http://216.30.191.148/071713%20VLS%20Cooper%20at%20risk%20reactor%20report%20FINAL1.pdf.Google Scholar
Corcoran, S. 2011. “Power Struggle: Relicensing Pilgrim Nuclear.” WGBH. Last modified November 21. www.wgbh.org/articles/Power-Struggle-Part-1-Relicensing-Pilgrim-Nuclear-4855.Google Scholar
CoRWM (Committee on Radioactive Waste Management). 2006. “Managing Our Radioactive Waste Safely.” CoRWM’s recommendations to Government. London: Committee on Radioactive Waste Management.Google Scholar
COWAM-2 (Community Waste Management-2). 2007. Quality of Decision-Making Processes WP3: Decision-Making Processes in Radioactive Waste Governance – Insights and Recommendations. Paris: COWAM.Google Scholar
DARA. 2012. Climate Vulnerability Monitor 2nd ed. Development Assistance Research Associates. Accessed November 1, 2013. http://daraint.org/climate-vulnerability-monitor/climate-vulnerability-monitor-2012/report/.Google Scholar
Darst, G. 1988. “Pilgrim Rated Second Worst Nuclear Plant in the Country.” The Telegraph, April 27.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. and Freudenberg, W.R.. 1996. “Gender and Environmental Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Available Research.” Environment and Behaviour 28 (3): 302–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DBER. 2008. A White Paper on Nuclear Power. London: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, HMSO.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. 1997. Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the C21. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DTI. 2003. Energy White Paper: Our Energy Future: Creating a Low Carbon Economy. London: Department of Trade and Industry HMSO.Google Scholar
de-Shalit, A. 1995. Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deutch, J. and Lester, R. 2004. Making Technology Work: Applications in Energy and the Environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1975. “Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?” Journal of Social Issues 31 (3): 137–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesendorf, M. 2007a. Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Diesendorf, M. 2007b. “Is Nuclear Energy a Possible Solution to Global Warming?” www.ceem.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/NukesSocialAlternativesMD.pdf.Google Scholar
Dobson, A., ed. 1999. Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolley, S. 2014. “US NRC expects application to extend nuclear licenses beyond 60 years, DOE official.” Platts, February 26. www.platts.com/latest-news/electric-power/washington/us-nrc-expects-application-to-extend-nuclear-21273628.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A.. 1982. Risk and Culture: An Essay in the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Downer, J. 2007. “When the Chick Hits the Fan: Representativeness and Reproducibility in Technological Testing.” Social Studies of Science 37 (1): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downer, J. 2011a. “’737-Cabriolet’: The Limits of Knowledge and the Sociology of Inevitable Failure.” American Journal of Sociology 117 (3): 725–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downer, J. 2011b. “On Audits and Airplanes: Redundancy and Reliability-Assessment in High Technologies.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 36 (4): 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downer, J. 2013. ““Disowning Fukushima: Managing the Credibility of Nuclear Reliability Assessment in the Wake Of Disaster.” Regulation and Governance. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rego.12029/pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, T.E. II 2010. “Reviving Nuclear Ethics: A Renewed Research Agenda for the Twenty-first Century.” Ethics and International Affairs 24 (3): 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, T.E. II 2013. “Liberal Democracy and Nuclear Despotism: Two Ethical Foreign Policy Dilemmas.” Ethics and Global Politics 6 (3): 155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutzik, T. and Madsen, T.. 2012. “Fukushima.” Environmental California. Accessed April 20 2012. www.environmentcalifornia.org/reports/cae/fukushima-one-year-later.Google Scholar
Dubrova, Y.E. 2003. “Radiation-Induced Transgenerational Instability.” Oncogene 22: 7087–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubrova, Y.E., Nesterov, V.N., Krouchinsky, N.G., Ostapenko, V.A., Neumann, R., Neil, D.L., and Jeffreys, A.. 1996. “Human Minisatellite Mutation Rate after the Chernobyl Accident.” Nature 380 (6576): 683–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubrova, Y.E., Polshchanskaya, O.G., Kozionova, O.S., and Akieyev, A.V.. 2006. “Minisatellite Germline Mutation Rate in the Techna River Population.” Mutation Research 602: 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubrova, Y.E., Hickenbotham, P., Glen, C.D., Monger, K., Wong, H-P., and Barber, R.C.. 2008. “Paternal Exposure to Ethylnitrosourea Results in Transgenerational Genomic Instability in Mice.” Environ. Mol. Mutagen 49: 308–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L.A. 2009. “The NPT: Assessing the Past, Building the Future.” The Nonproliferation Review 16 (2): 143–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvorak, P. 2012. “Fukushima Daiichi’s Unit 4 Spent-Fuel Pool: Safe or Not?” Wall Street Journal Japan. Last modified April 17. http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2012/05/21/fukushima-daiichis-unit-4-spent-fuel-pool-safe-or-not/.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: the Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
EcoLaw. 2012a. “Clean Water Act, § 505 Notice of Intent to Initiate Citizen Suit for Violations at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Plymouth, Massachusetts.” NPDES Permit No. MA 0000355. Last modified October 5. http://jonesriver.org/legal/entergy-water-pollution-at-pilgrim-nuclear-is-subject-of-federal-notice-of-intent-to-sue-for-831-million-in-penalties/.Google Scholar
EcoLaw. 2012b. “Request to the National Marine Fisheries Service: ESA § 7: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Biological Assessment on Entergy’s Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Plymouth, Massachusetts.” Last modified April 24. www.capecodbaywatch.org/library/.Google Scholar
EcoLaw. 2013. “Zoning Board Appeal under M.G.L. 40A, §§ 7,8,15 and 17 Plymouth Zoning By-Law 205–15.” Last modified April 25. www.capecodbaywatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/04.25.13-appeal-letter-final-filed_signed.pdf.Google Scholar
EcoLaw vs. Entergy Nuclear Generation Company. 2013. “Board of Appeals Decision,” Case No. 3712, July 10. www.capecodbaywatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/zba-decision-of-july-24-2013.pdf.Google Scholar
EIA. 2012. “Massachusetts Nuclear Profile 2010.” US Energy Information Administration, April 26. www.eia.gov/nuclear/state/massachusetts/.Google Scholar
Emerson, R.W. 1904. The Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, edited by Sampson, G.. London: George Bell.Google Scholar
English, R., ed. 1985. Ethics and Nuclear Arms: European and American Perspectives. Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.Google Scholar
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2013. Learn About Your Right to Know. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed 14 November. www.epa.gov/epahome/r2k.htmGoogle Scholar
EPA. 2014. “Environmental Justice.” United States Environmental Protection Agency Website. www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/.Google Scholar
Erikson, K. 1991. “Radiation’s Lingering Dread.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 47 (2): 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EWI (Institute for Energy Economics). 2011. Roadmap 2050 – a Closer Look. www.ewi.uni-koeln.de/publikationen/studien.Google Scholar
Fackler, M. 2011. “Nuclear Crisis Set Off Fears Over Tokyo, Report Says.” New York Times. Last modified February 27, 2012. www.nytimes.com/2012/02/28/world/asia/japan-considered-tokyo-evacuation-during-the-nuclear-crisis-report-says.html?_r=1.Google Scholar
Faulkner, W. 2000a. “The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for ‘Making Gender Stick’ to Engineers.” Science, Technology and Human Values 25: 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, W. 2000b. “Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering.” Social Studies of Science 30: 759–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippi, A.R., Franco, P., and Ricardi, U.. 2006. “Is Clinical Radiosensitivity a Complex Genetically Controlled Event?” Tumori 92 (2): 87–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finn, M. and Henwood, K.L.. 2009. “Exploring Masculinities within Men’s Identificatory Imaginings of First-time Fatherhood.” British Journal of Social Psychology 48(3): 547–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K.. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. and Davis, K.. 1993. Negotiating at the Margins: The Gendered Discourse of Power and Resistance. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Flüeler, T. 2006. Decision Making for Complex Socio-Technical Systems: Robustness from Lessons Learned in Long-term Radioactive Waste Governance. Environment & Policy Vol. 42. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, J., Slovic, P., and Mertz, C.K.. 1994. “Gender, Race and Perception of Environmental Health Risks.” Risk Analysis 14: 1101–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., and Cornkran, L.. 1979. “Effects of ‘Voice’ and Peer Opinions on Responses to Inequity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 2253–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, H.P. and Winters, F.X., eds. 1977. Ethics and Nuclear Strategy?. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
Forman, D., Cook-Mozaffari, P., Darby, S., Davey, G., Stratton, I., Doll, R., and Pike, M.. 1987. “Cancer Near Nuclear Installations.” Nature 329: 499–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsa Gesellschaft für Sozialforschung und statistischen Analysen mbh. 2013. www.kernenergie.de/kernenergie-wAssets/docs/themen/2013-05-forsa-umfrage-kernkraft.pdf.Google Scholar
Foster, M. 2013. “Stress a Major Health Issue.” Japan Today, March 10. www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/stress-a-major-health-issue-for-dsplaced-fukushima-residents.Google Scholar
Freundenberg, W.R. and Pastor, S.K.. 1992. “Public Responses to Technological Risks: Toward a Sociological Perspective.” The Sociological Quarterly 33: 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frickel, S. and Moore, K.. 2006. The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Frisch, M. 2013. “Modeling Climate Policies: A Critical Look at Integrated Assessment Models.” Philosophy & Technology 26: 117–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frosh, S. 2002. Afterwords: The Personal in Gender, Culture and Psychotherapy. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. 2009. “Spreading Temptation: Proliferation and Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Agreements.” International Security 34 (1): 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funabashi, Y. and Kitazawa, K.. 2012. “Fukushima in Review.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68 (2): 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbard, A. 1993. “Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger.” Oak Ridge National Laboratory Review 26 (3–4).Google Scholar
GAO. 2013. Nuclear Reactor License Renewal. Government Accountability Office 13–493. May. http://gao.gov/assets/660/654949.pdf.Google Scholar
Gardiner, S.M. 2003. “The Pure Intergenerational Problem.” Monist 86: 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S.M. 2004. “Ethics and Global Climate Change.” Ethics no. 114: 555–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S.M. 2005. “Ethics and the Principles of Radiological Protection: An Outsider’s View.” Conference Presentation: Universite Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Ethics and Radiological Protection: Critical Perspectives on Justification, Liability and Intergenerational Justice.Google Scholar
Gardiner, S.M. 2006a. “Why Do Future Generations Need Protection?” Chaire Développement Durable: 1–16.Google Scholar
Gardiner, S.M. 2006b. “A Core Precautionary Principle.” Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (1): 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S.M. 2008. “Why We Need More than Justification in the Ethics of Nuclear Protection.” In Ethics and Radiological Protection, edited by Eggermont, G. and Feltz, B., 97–111. Louvain-Le-Neuve: Academia.Google Scholar
Gardiner, S.M. 2009. “A Contract on Future Generations?” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas, 77–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S.M. 2011. A Perfect Moral Storm. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S.M., Caney, S., Jamieson, D., and Shue, H., eds. 2010. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M.J., Snee, M.P., Hall, A.J., Powell, C.A., Downes, S., and Terrell, J.D.. 1990. “Results of Case Control Study of Leukemia and Lymphoma among Young People near Sellafield Nuclear Plant in West Cumbria.” British Medical Journal 300: 423–34.Google Scholar
Gardoni, P. and Murphy, C.. 2008. “Recovery from Natural and Man-Made Disasters as Capabilities Restoration and Enhancement.” International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 3 (4): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardoni, P. and Murphy, C.. 2009. “A Capabilities-Based Approach to Measuring the Societal Impacts of Natural and Man-Made Hazards in Risk Analysis.” ASCE Natural Hazards Review 10 (2): 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardoni, P. and Murphy, C.. 2010. “Gauging the Societal Impacts of Natural Disasters Using a Capabilities-Based Approach.” Disasters 34 (3): 619–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardoni, P. and Murphy, C.. 2013. “A Capability Approach for Seismic Risk Analysis and Management.” In Seismic Risk Analysis and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems, edited by Tesfamariam, S. and Goda, K., 255–67. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Gardoni, P. and Murphy, C.. 2014. “A Scale of Risk.” Risk Analysis 34 (7): 1208–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, B.E., Eden, O.B., Barrett, A., Stiller, C.A., and Draper, G.J.. 1988. “Leukemia in Young Children in Scotland.” Lancet 2: 630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giel, R. 1991. “Hoe Erg Was Chernobyl? De Psychosociale Gevolgen van Het Reactorongeluk.” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 135 (25): 1137–41.Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gofman, J. 1995. “Foreword.” In Yaroshinska, A.. Chernobyl, 1–2. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. and Rosner, R.. 2011. Nuclear Reactors: Generation to Generation. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts & Sciences.Google Scholar
Gonzales, W.J. 2010. “Recent Approaches on Observation and Experimentation: A Philosophical-Methodological Viewpoint.” In New Methodological Perspectives on Observation and Experimentation in Science edited by Gonzales, W.J., 9–48. La Coruna: Netbiblo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, A.J., Akashi, M., Boice, J.D, Chino, M., Homma, T., Ishigure, N., Kai, M., et al. 2013. “Radiological Protection Issues Arising during and after the Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Accident.” Journal of Radiological Protection: Official Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection 33 (3): 497–571 doi:10.1088/0952–4746/33/3/497. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23803462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodin, R. 1999. “The Sustainability Ethic: Political, Not Just Moral.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 16(3): 247–54.Google Scholar
Gosseries, A. 2008. “Radiological Protection and Intergenerational Justice.” In Ethics and Radiological Protection, edited by Eggermont, G. and Feltz, B., 167–95. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-Bruylant.Google Scholar
Gosseries, A. and Meyer, L. eds. 2009. Intergenerational Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottweis, H. 1998. Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenpeace and European Renewable Energy Council. 2012. Energy [R]evolution: Towards a Fully Renewable Energy Supply in the EU 27. www.erec.org/fileadmin/erec_docs/Documents/Publications/EU%20Energy%20[R]evolution%20Scenario%202050.pdf.Google Scholar
Grunwald, A. 2011. “Energy Futures: Diversity and the Need for Assessment.” Futures 8 (43): 820–30.Google Scholar
Grunwald, A. 2014. “Modes of Orientation Provided by Futures Studies: Making Sense of Diversity and Divergence.” European Journal of Futures Research 2 (1): 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidi, M.E.L. 2008. “Everybody to Count for One, Nobody for More than One.” Revue d’études benthamiennes 4. http://etudes-benthamiennes.revues.org/182.Google Scholar
Guizard, A.V., Boutou, O., Pottier, D., Troussard, X., Pheby, D., Launoy, G., Slama, R., and Spira, A.. 2001. “The Incidence of Childhood Leukaemia around the La Hague Nuclear Waste Reprocessing Plant (France): A Survey for the Years 1978–1998.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 55: 469–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, A. 2012. “Tokyo Soil Samples Would Be Considered Nuclear Waste In The US.” Fairewinds Energy Education, March 25. www.fairewinds.org/node/223.Google Scholar
Gustafson, P. 1998. “Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives.” Risk Analysis 18: 805–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, A., Hermann, A., and Huber, F.. 2007. Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications 4th ed. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagendijk, R. and Irwin, A.. 2006. “Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Europe.” Minerva 44: 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamada, K. and Tsukimori, O.. 2014. “Japan’s Regulator OKs Nuclear Plant Return While Pushing to Close Old Reactors.” The Japan Times Online, September 10. www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/09/10/national/japan-ok-nuclear-plant-return-pushing-close-old-reactors/.Google Scholar
Hanauer, S.H. 1972. “U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, memo on Pressure-Suppression Containment to J.F. O’Leary, F.E. Kruesi, and L. Rogers.” September 20.Google Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2003a. “Are Natural Risks Less Dangerous Than Technological Risks?” Philosophia Naturalis 40: 43–54.Google Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2003c. “Ethical Criteria of Risk Acceptance.” Erkenntnis 59: 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2007. “Ethics and Radiation Protection.” Journal of Radiological Protection 27: 147–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansson, S.O. 2009a. “Ethics Beyond Application.” In Cutting Through the Surface: Philosophical Approaches to Bioethics, edited by Takala, T., Herissone-Kelly, P., and Holm, S., 19–28. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2009b. “Risk and Safety in Technology.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science Volume 9: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by Meijers, A., 1069–1102. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2009c. “Should We Protect the Most Sensitive People?” Journal of Radiological Protection 29: 211–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansson, S.O. 2011a. “Radiation Protection: Sorting Out the Arguments.” Philosophy and Technology 24: 363–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2011b. “Risk.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Last modified August 11, 2011. Accessed 23 March 2010. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/risk/.Google Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2012. “A Panorama of the Philosophy of Risk.” In Handbook of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R.,Sandin, P., and Peterson, M., 27–54. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2013a. The Ethics of Risk: Ethical Analysis in an Uncertain World. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2013b. “Moral Thinking and Radiation Protection.” In Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk Management, edited by Oughton, D. and Hansson, S.O., 33–52. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2013c. “ALARA: What Is Reasonably Achievable?” In Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk Management, edited by Oughton, D. and Hansson, S.O., 143–58. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hare-Mustin, R. and Maracek, J.. 1990. Making a Difference: Psychology and the Construction of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Harwell, M. A. and Hutchinson, T. C.. 1985. Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War, Volume II: Ecological and Agricultural Effects. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hashmi, Sohail H. and Lee, Steven P.. 2004. Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, M.C., Beyea, J., Nieves, J.W., and Susser, M.. 1990. “Cancer Near the Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant.” American Journal of Epidemiology 132 (3): 397–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatch, M.C., Wallenstein, S., Beyea, J., Nieves, J.W., and Susser, M.. 1991. “Cancer Rates After the Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident.” American Journal of Public Health 81 (6): 719–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatch, T., Derijck, A.A., Black, P.D., Van Der Heiden, G.W., DeBoer, P., and Dubrova, Y.E.. 2007. “Maternal Effects of the Scid Mutation on Radiation-Induced Transgenerational Instability in Mice.” Oncogene 26: 4720–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausman, D.S. and McPherson, M.S.. 2009. “Preference Satisfaction and Welfare Economics.” Economics and Philosophy 25: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health and Safety Executive. 2001. Reducing Risks, Protecting People: HSE’s Decision-Making Process. Norwich: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/r2p2.pdf.Google Scholar
Heasman, M.A., Kemp, I.W., Urquhart, J.D., and Black, R..1986. “Childhood Leukaemia in Northern Scotland.” Lancet 1: 266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendee, W. R. and Edwards, F. M.. 1986. “ALARA and an Integrated Approach to Radiation Protection.” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 16:142–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, D.C. 1999. “The Ethics of Collective Security.” In Ethics and International Affairs, edited by Rosenthal, J.H., 221–41. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Henshaw, D.L. 1996. “Chernobyl 10 Years On.” British Medical Journal 312 (7038): 1052–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henwood, K.L. 2008. “Qualitative Research, Reflexivity and Living with Risk: Valuing and Practicing Epistemic Reflexivity and Centring Marginality.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 5 (1): 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henwood, K.L. and Pidgeon, N.. 2013. “What is the Relationship Between Identity and Technological, Economic, Demographic, Environmental and Political Change as Viewed through a Risk Lens?” UK Foresight Future Identities Project. Report DR18, Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/275780/13-519-identity-and-change-through-a_risk-lens.pdf.Google Scholar
Henwood, K.L., Griffin, C., and Phoenix, A.. 1998. Standpoints and Differences: Essays in the Practice of Feminist Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Henwood, K.L., Gill, R., and Mclean, C.. 2002. “The Changing Man.” Psychologist 15 (4): 182–86.Google Scholar
Henwood, K.L., Parkhill, K.A., and Pidgeon, N.. 2008a. “Science, Technology and Risk Perception: From Gender Differences to the Effects Made by Gender.” Equal Opportunities International 27 (8): 662–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henwood, K.L., Pidgeon, N., Sarre, S., Simmons, P., and Smith, N.. 2008b. “Risk, Framing and Everyday Life: Methodological and Ethical Reflections from Three Socio-cultural Projects.” Health, Risk and Society 10: 421–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henwood, K.L., Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K.A., and Simmons, P.. 2010. “Researching Risk: Narrative, Biography, Subjectivity [43 paragraphs].” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11 (1):Art. 20. Reprinted in Historical Social Research 2011 36 (4).Google Scholar
Henwood, K.A., Pidgeon, N., and Parkhill, K.A.. 2015 “Explaining the ‘gender-risk effect’ in risk perception research: A qualitative secondary analysis study. Special edition of Psyecology: Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology. DOI:10.1080/21711976.2014.977532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, A.M. and Hopley, G.W.. 2007. Nuclear Energy Now. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley: 138.Google Scholar
Herman, B. 1993. The Practice of Moral Judgement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hillerbrand, R. and Peterson, M.. 2014. “Nuclear Power is Neither Right nor Wrong: the Case for a Tertium Datur in the Ethics of Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2): 583–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hitchcock, J.L. 2001. “Gender Differences in Risk Perceptions: Broadening the Contexts.” Risk: Health, Safety and Environment 12: 179–204.Google Scholar
Hohenemser, C., Deicher, M., Hofsäss, H., Lindner, G., Recknagel, E., and Budnick, J.I.. 1986. “Agricultural Impact of Chernobyl.” Nature 321: 817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollyday, J. 1991. “In The Valley of the Shadow of Three Miles Island.” In Nuclear Energy and Ethics, edited by Shrader-Frechette, K.S., 136–60. Geneva: World Council of Churches Publications.Google Scholar
Hsieh, N. 2007. “Is Incomparability a Problem for Anyone?” Economics and Philosophy 23: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, M.K. 1956. “Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels’ Drilling and Production Practice.” www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford Philosophical Texts, edited by Norton, D.F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, P. 2012. The Future of Nuclear Energy in the UK: Report of the Birmingham Policy Commission. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Hvistendahl, M. 2007. “Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste.” Scientific American. www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/.Google Scholar
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 1991. International Chernobyl Project: Technical Report. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IAEA. 1995. The Principles of Radioactive Waste Management. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IAEA. 1997. Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management (Information Circular). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2001. Safety Assessment and Verification for Nuclear Power Plants Safety Guide. IAEA Safety Standards Series. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2002. Dosimetry for Food Irradiation. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency 3.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2003. The Long Term Storage of Radioactive Waste: Safety and Sustainability: A Position Paper of International Experts. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2005. Energy Indicators for Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2007. IAEA Safety Glossary: Terminology Used in Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1290_web.pdf.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2010. Development and Application of Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-3. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IAEA. 2012. Communication with the Public in a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. 16.Google Scholar
IAEA, Euratom, FAO, ILO, IMO, OECD-NEA, PAHO, UNEP, and WHO. 2006. Fundamental Safety Principles. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SF1. Vienna: A joint publication of Euratom, FAO, IAEA, ILO, IMO, OECD-NEA, PAHO, UNEP, WHO.Google Scholar
ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). 1977. “Recommendations of the ICRP: ICRP Publication 26.” Annals of the International Commission on Radiological Protection 1 (3).Google Scholar
ICRP. 1998. “Radiation Protection Recommendations as Applied to the Disposal of Long-Lived Solid Radioactive Waste: ICRP Publication 81.” Annals of the International Commission on Radiological Protection 28 (14).Google Scholar
ICRP. 2007. “The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP Publication No. 103.” Annals of the International Commission on Radiological Protection 37 (2–4): 1–332.Google Scholar
ICRP. 2012. “Report of ICRP Task Group 84 on Initial Lessons Learned from the Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Japan vis-à-vis the ICRP System of Radiological Protection.” International Commission on Radiological Protection. www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP%20TG84%20Summary%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
ICRP. 2013. “Radiological Protection in Geological Disposal of Long-Lived Solid Radioactive Waste: ICRP Publication 122.” Annals of the International Commission on Radiological Protection 42 (3): 1–58.Google Scholar
IEA (International Energy Agency). 2013a. Key World Energy Statistics 2012. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Inaiima, T. and Okada, Y.. 2012. “Japan May Be Atomic-Power Free Next Month After Shutdown.” Bloomberg Businessweek, April 17. www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-16/japan-may-beatomic-power-free-next-month-after-shutdown.Google Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, A., and Wynne, B.. 1996. Misunderstanding Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J.F., van de Poel, I., and Osseweijer, P.. 2010. “Sunscreens with Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nano-Particles: A Societal Experiment.” Nanoethics 4: 103–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, M.Z. and Delucchi, M.A.. 2009. “A Path to Sustainable Energy by 2030.” Scientific American, November 2009, 58–65.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, J.M. 1990. Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeanes, E.L. 2007. “The Doing and Undoing of Gender: The Importance of Being a Credible Female Victim.” Gender, Work and Organisation 14 (6): 552–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffe, H. 1999. Risk and the Other. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, E. 2012. “Nation Marks First Anniversary of Disasters.” The Japan Times, March 12. www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/03/12/national/nation-marks-first-anniversary-of-disasters/#.VOvfGPnF__M.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. 2007. Database of Radiological Incidents and Related Events. www.johnstonsarchive.net/nuclear/radevents/radevents1.html.Google Scholar
Jones, P. 2000. “Global Distributive Justice.” In Ethics in International Affairs, edited by Valls, A., 169–83. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Jones-Lee, M. and Aven, T.. 2011. “ALARP – What Does It Really Mean?” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96: 877–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joskow, P.L., Parsons, J.E., and Harrison, G.. 2012. The Future of Nuclear Power after Fukushima. Boston: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungk, R. 1977. Der Atom-Staat: vom Fortschritt in d. Unmenschlichkeit. 2nd ed. München: Kindler.Google Scholar
Kaatsch, P., Spix, C., Schulze-Rath, R., Schmiedel, S., and Blettner, M.. 2008. “Leukemia in Young Children Living in the Vicinity of German Nuclear Power Plants.” International Journal of Cancer 1220: 721–26.Google Scholar
Kahn, L. 2011. “Is the United States Prepared for a Nuclear Reactor Accident?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April 2011. http://thebulletin.org/node/8705.Google Scholar
KASAM. 1988. Ethical Aspects on Nuclear Waste. Report No. 29. Stockholm: National Council for Nuclear Waste.Google Scholar
KASAM. 2005. Nuclear Waste State-of-the-Art Reports 2004. SOU 2004:67. Stockholm: National Council for Nuclear Waste.Google Scholar
KASAM. 2007. Nuclear Waste State-of-the-Art Report 2007 – Responsibility of Current Generation, Freedom of Future Generations. SOU 2004:67. Stockholm: National Council for Nuclear Waste..Google Scholar
Kasperson, R.E. 1983. Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste Management. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.Google Scholar
Kasperson, R.E., Golding, D., and Tuler, S.. 1992. “Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks.” Journal of Social Issues 48 (4):161–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathren, R.L. and Ziemer, P.L.. 1980. “The First Fifty Years of Radiation Protection – A Brief Sketch.” In Health Physics: A Backward Glance, edited by Kathren, R.L. and Ziemer, P.L., 1–9. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kathren, R.L., Munson, L.H., and Higby, D.P.. 1984. “Application of Risk-Cost Benefit Techniques to ALARA and De-Minimis.” Health Physics 47: 195.Google Scholar
Kennedy, H. 2012. “Japan Quake & Tsunami: 1 Man Stays Behind.” NY Daily News, March 12. www.nydailynews.com/news/world/japan-earthquake-tsunami-man-stays-tend-animals-left-radioactive-zone-article-1.1036148.Google Scholar
Kleiner, K. 2008. “Nuclear Energy: Assessing the Emissions.” Nature Reports 2 www.nature.com/climate/2008/0810/pdf/climate.2008.99.pdf.Google Scholar
Koike, R., Tsuzaka, N., and Uechi, K.. 2013. “Oi Nuke Reactors to Stay Online.” The Asahi Shimbun, March 20. http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201303200067.Google Scholar
Kraft, M.E. and Clary, B.B.. 1991. “Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal.” The Western Political Quarterly 44 (2): 299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krimsky, S. 2003. Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Krimsky, S. 2010. “Combating the Funding Effect in Science: What’s Beyond Transparency?” Stanford Law & Policy Review 21: 101–23.Google Scholar
Kritidis, P. and Florou, H.. 2001. “Radiological Impact in Greece of the Chernobyl Accident.” Health Physics 80 (5): 440–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krohn, W. and Weingart, P.. 1987. “Commentary: Nuclear Power as a Social Experiment-European Political “Fall Out” from the Chernobyl Meltdown.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 12: 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krohn, W. and Weyer, J.. 1994. “Society as a Laboratory: The Social Risks of Experimental Research.” Science and Public Policy 21: 173–83.Google Scholar
Krütli, P. 2007. “Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle – wie eine einst betroffene Bevölkerung die Dinge sieht.” In Entscheidungsprozesse Wellenberg – Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle in der Schweiz. ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2006, edited by Scholz, R.W., Stauffacher, M., Bösch, S. and Krütli, P., 51–83. Zurich: Rüegger.Google Scholar
Krütli, P. 2010. Radioactive Waste Management: Justice and Decision-Making Processes in Repository Siting. DISS. ETH NO. 19016, Environmental Sciences, ETH, Zurich.Google Scholar
Krütli, P., Flüeler, T., Stauffacher, M., Wiek, A., and Scholz, R.W.. 2010. “Technical Safety vs. Public Involvement? A Case Study on the Unrealized Project for the Disposal of Nuclear Waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland).” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 7 (3): 229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krütli, P., Stauffacher, M., Pedolin, D., Moser, C., and Scholz, R.W.. 2012. “The Process Matters: Fairness in Repository Siting For Nuclear Waste.” Social Justice Research 25 (1): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Künneke, R., Mehos, D., Hillerbrand, R., and Hemmes, K.. Forthcoming. “Understanding Values Embedded in Offshore Wind Energy Systems: Towards a Purposeful Institutional and Technological Design.” Environmental Science & Policy.Google Scholar
Kyodo, . 2014. “Fault beneath Tsuruga Nuclear Reactor Is Active, Watchdog Panel Reaffirms.” The Japan Times Online, November 20. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/11/20/national/fault-beneath-tsuruga-nuclear-reactor-is-active-watchdog-panel-reaffirms/#.VOttxi5GR8E.Google Scholar
Landrigan, P. 2001. Testimony before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, US Senate. Garden City, NY: Adelphi University.Google Scholar
Langhelle, O. 2000. “Sustainable Development and Social Justice: Expanding the Rawlsian Framework of Global Justice.” Environmental Values 9 (3): 295–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lash, S. 2000. “Risk Culture.” In The Risk Society and Beyond Critical Issues for Social Theory, edited by Adam, B., Beck, U., and Van Loon, J., 47–62. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lash, S. and Wynne, B.. 1992. “Introduction.” In Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Beck, U., 1–8. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Laue, H.J., Bennett, L.L., and Skjoeldebrand, R.. 1977. “Nuclear Power in Developing Countries.” IAEA Bulletin 26 (1): 3–8.Google Scholar
Lean, G. 2012. “Why Nuclear is in Meltdown.” The Telegraph, March 2. www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9118831/Why-nuclear-is-in-meltdown.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.J. and Schunn, C.D.. 2011. “Social Biases and Solutions for Procedural Objectivity.” Hypatia 26 (2): 352–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.P. 1985. “The Morality of Nuclear Deterrence: Hostage Holding and Consequences.” Ethics 95: 549–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legere, C. 2013. “Plymouth Nuclear Plant Receives Lower Performance Rating.” Cape Cod Times, November 7. www.capecodtimes.com/article/20131107/NEWS11/131109748?template=printart.Google Scholar
Leventhal, G.S. 1976. “Fairness in Social Relationships.” In Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, edited by Thibaut, J.W, Spence, J.T. and Carson, R.C., 211–39. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Leventhal, G.S. 1980. “What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches in the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships.” In Social exchange. Advances in Research and Theory, edited by Gergen, K.J., Greenberg, M.S. and Willis, R.S., 27–55. New York: Plenum PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, R.J. 2009. “Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in Residents Surrounding the Three Mile Island Nuclear Facility.” Laryngoscope 118 (4): 618–28.Google Scholar
Levite, A.E. 2002/03. “Never Say Never Again: Nuclear Reversal Revisited.” International Security 27 (3): 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, H.W., Budnitz, R.J., Kouts, H.J.C., Loewenstein, W.B., Rowe, W.D., von Hippel, F., and Zachariasen, F.. 1978. Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R.. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindell, B. 1996 “The History of Radiation Protection.” Radiation Protection Dosimetry 68: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindell, B. and Beninson, D.J.. 1981. “ALARA Defines its Own Limit.” Health Physics 41: 684–85.Google Scholar
Lipscy, P.Y., Kushida, K.E., and Incerti, T.. 2013. “The Fukushima Disaster and Japan’s Nuclear Plant Vulnerability in Comparative Perspective.” Environmental Science & Technology 47: 6082–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lochbaum, D. 2012. “To Filter Or Not To Filter That Is The Question With Only One Sane Answer.” Union Of Concerned Scientist. http://allthingsnuclear.org/to-filter-or-not-to-filter-that-is-the-question-with-only-one-sane-answer/.Google Scholar
Löfquist, L. 2008. “Ethics Beyond Finitude, Responsibilities Towards Future Generations and Nuclear Waste Management (PhD Dissertation).” Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Lohan, M. 2000. “Constructive Tensions in Feminist Studies.” Social Studies of Science 30 (6): 895–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, H. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, H. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, C. and Strathern, M.. 1992. Nature, Culture, Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, A. and Ewing, R.C.. 2006. Uncertainty Underground: Yucca Mountain and the Nation’s High-Level Nuclear Waste. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFhionnbhairr, D. 2004. “The New Agenda Coalition.” In Nuclear Disarmament in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Huntley, W.L., Mizumoto, K., and Kurosawa, M., 275–88. Hiroshima: Hiroshima Peace Institute.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 1990. Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Weapon Guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, D. 1996. “How Do We Know the Properties of Artifacts? Applying the Sociology of Knowledge to Technology.” In Technological Change, edited by Fox, R., 249–51. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Maier, D.S. 2012. What’s So Good about Biodiversity? A Call for Better Reasoning about Nature’s Value. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mand, F. 2013. “Performance Issues Plague Plant.” Wicked Local Plymouth, December 31. www.wickedlocal.com/plymouth/news/x800891513/PILGRIM-STATION-Performance-issues-plague-plant#ixzz2pIIvCgKx.Google Scholar
Mand, F. 2014. “Plymouth Town Election: Dry Cask on Ballot.” Wicked Local Plymouth, April 5. http://plymouth.wickedlocal.com/article/20140405/NEWS/140407690/0/SEARCH.Google Scholar
Mangano, J.J. 2000. “Improvements in Local Infant Health after Nuclear Power Reactor Closing.” Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology 2: 32–36.Google Scholar
Mangano, J.J. 2002. “Infant Death and Childhood Cancer Reductions after Nuclear Plant Closings in the United States.” Archives of Environmental Health 57: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangano, J.J. 2006. “A Short Latency Between Radiation Exposure From Nuclear Plants and Cancer In Young Children.” International Journal of Health Services 36 (1): 113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangano, J.J. 2008. “Excess Infant Mortality after Nuclear Plant Startup in Rural Mississippi.” International Journal of Health Services 38: 277–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangano, J.J. and Sherman, J.D.. 2008. “Childhood Leukemia Near Nuclear Installations.” European Journal of Cancer Care 17 (4): 416–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Manning, R. 1981. “Environmental Ethics and Rawls’ Theory of Justice.” Environmental Ethics 3 (2): 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markandya, A. and Wilkinson, P.. 2007. “Electricity Generation and Health.” The Lancet 370 (9591): 979–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markey, E. 2013. “New NRC Policy Restricts Congressional Oversight, Undermines Transparency.” November 21. www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/markey-new-nrc-policy-restricts-congressional-oversight-undermines-transparency.Google Scholar
Masco, J. 2006. The Nuclear Borderlands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massachusetts Department of Public Health. 2013. Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station: Tritium in Groundwater Monitoring Wells. November 22. www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/dph/environmental/radiationcontrol/tritium/2013-updates/pnps-update-11-22-2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Matsumura, A. 2012. “Fukushima Daiichi Site: Cesium-137 is 85 Times Greater than at Chernobyl Accident.” Finding the Missing Link, April 3. http://akiomatsumura.com/2012/04/682.html.Google Scholar
Mazrani, W., McHugh, K., and Marsden, P.J.. 2007. “The Radiation Burden of Radiological Investigations.” Archives of Disease in Childhood 92: 1127–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCusker, K.E., Armour, K.C., Bitz, C.M., and Battisti, D.S.. 2014. “Rapid and Extensive Warming Following Cessation of Solar Radiation Management.” Environmental Research Letters 9 (2) 024005 doi:10.1088/1748–9326/9/2/024005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mc Mahon, J. 2013. “Six Nuclear Plants That Could Be Next to Shut Down.” Forbes, November 11. www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2013/11/07/6-nuclear-plants-that-may-be-next-to-shut-down/#comments_header.Google Scholar
Merlo, D.F., Knudsen, L.E., Matusiewicz, K., Niebrój, L., and Vähäkangas, K.H.. 2007. “Ethics in Studies on Children and Environmental Health.” Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (7): 408–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metzger, A. 2014 “Gov. Patrick Calls for shutting down Plymouth Nuclear Plant.” Wicked Local Plymouth, March 19. http://plymouth.wickedlocal.com/article/20140319/NEWS/140315712/0/SEARCH.Google Scholar
MEXT (Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology). 2011. To Educators, For Correctly Understanding Radioactivity. Translated by Setsuko Shiqa, University of Notre Dame. Tokyo: MEXT.Google Scholar
Miano, S. 2014. “Pilgrim’s Spent Nuclear Fuel Needs to be Moved as Soon as Possible.” Manomet Current, April 10. http://manometcurrent.com/opinion-pilgrims-spent-nuclear-fuel-needs-moved-soon-possible/.Google Scholar
Michaelis, J., Keller, B., Haaf, G., and Kaatsch, P.. 1992. “Incidence of Childhood Malignancies in the Vicinity of West German Nuclear Power Plants.” Cancer Causes and Control 3: 255–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michaels, D.M. and Monforton, C.. 2005. “Manufacturing Uncertainty: Contested Science and the Protection of the Public’s Health and Environment.” American Journal of Public Health 95: S39–S48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikula, G. 1980. “On the Role of Justice in Allocation Decisions.” In Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contributions from Psychological Research, edited by Mikula, G., 127–66. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mileti, D.S. 1999. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1999. Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Millo, Y., and Lezaun, J.. 2006. “Regulatory Experiments: Genetically Modified Crops and Financial Derivatives on Trial.” Science and Public Policy 33: 179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, E.G.A.P. and Mousseau, T.A.. 2009. “Reduced Abundance of Insects and Spiders Linked to Radiation at Chernobyl 20 Years after the Accident.” Biology Letters doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, N. 2012. “The Concepts of Risk and Safety.” In Handbook of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P. and Peterson, M., 55–85. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, N.P. and Ruby, K.G.. 2009. “IR and the False Promise of Philosophical Foundations.” International Theory 1 (1): 15–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, S.L. 2010. The Powers That Be. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, P.M. 2006. International Security: Problems and Solutions. Washington DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Morris, M. and Knorr, R.. 1990. “The Southeastern Massachusetts Health Study 1978–1986.” Massachusetts Department of Public Health, October.Google Scholar
Morris, M. and Knorr, R.. 1994. The Southeastern Massachusetts Health Study 1978–1986. Boston: Massachusetts Department of Public Health.Google Scholar
Mosk, M. 2011. “Fukushima: Mark 1 Nuclear Reactor Design Caused GE Scientist to Quit in Protest.” ABC News, March 15.Google Scholar
Mulgan, T. 2006. Future People: A Moderate Consequentialist Account of our Obligations to Future Generations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, C. and Gardoni, P.. 2006. “The Role of Society in Engineering Risk Analysis: a Capabilities-Based Approach.” Risk Analysis 26 (4): 1073–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, C. and Gardoni, P.. 2007. “Determining Public Policy and Resource Allocation Priorities for Mitigating Natural Hazards: a Capabilities-Based Approach.” Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4): 489–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, C. and Gardoni, P.. 2008. “The Acceptability and the Tolerability of Societal Risks: a Capabilities-Based Approach.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, C. and Gardoni, P.. 2010. “Assessing Capability Instead of Achieved Functionings in Risk Analysis.” Journal of Risk Research 13 (2): 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, C. and Gardoni, P.. 2011a. “Design, Risk and Capabilities” in Human Capabilities, Technology, and Design, edited by van den Hoven, J. and Oosterlaken, I., 173–88. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. and Gardoni, P.. 2011b. “Evaluating the Source of the Risks Associated with Natural Events.” Res Publica 17: 125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, C., and Gardoni, P.. 2012. “The Capability Approach in Risk Analysis.” In Handbook of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser, S., 979–97. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
NAIIC (Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission). 2012. “The Official Report of The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission: Executive summary.” Tokyo: National Diet of Japan.. http://reliefweb.int/node/508828Google Scholar
Nakicenovic, N., Davidson, O., Davis, G., Grübler, A., Kram, T., La Rovere, E. Lebre, Metz, B., Morita, T., Pepper, W., Pitcher, H., A. Sankovski, P. Shukla, R. Swart, R. Watson, and Z. Dadi, . 2000. IPCC Special Report: Emission Scenarios. http://se-server.ethz.ch/staff/af/fi159/N/Na020.pdfGoogle Scholar
Naqvi, F. 1998. “A Computable General Equilibrium Model of Energy, Economy and Equity Interactions in Pakistan.” Energy Economics 20 (4): 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 2001. Disposition of High-Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: The Continuing Societal and Technical Challenges. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2003. One Step at a Time: The Staged Development of Geologic Repositories for High-Level Radioactive Waste. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences. 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
NEA-OECD (Nuclear Energy Agency-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2002. Chernobyl: Assessment of Radiological and Health Impact 2002. Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd-nea.org/rp/reports/2003/nea3508-chernobyl.pdf.Google Scholar
NEA-OECD. 1995. The Environmental and Ethical Basis of Geological Disposal of Long-Lived Radioactive Wastes: A Collective Opinion of the Radioactive Waste Management Committee of the Nuclear Energy Agency. Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
NEA-OECD. 2004. Learning and Adapting to Societal Requirements for Radioactive Waste Management. Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Newton-Small, J. 2005. “U.S. Energy Legislation May Be ‘Renaissance’ for Nuclear Power.” Bloomberg. www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aXb5iuqdZoD4&refer=us.Google Scholar
Nisbet, A. and Woodman, R.. 2000. “Options for the Management of Chernobyl-Restricted Areas in England and Wales.” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 51 (2): 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishikawa, J. 2012. “Some Progress, But Radiation Remains High at Fukushima Nuclear Plant.” The Asahi Shimbum, October 13. http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201210130030Google Scholar
Nitsch, J., Pregger, T., Naegler, T., Heide, D., de Tena, D.L., Trieb, F., and Scholz, Y.. 2012. “Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global.” Schlussbericht BMU – FKZ 03MAP146. www.energiesystemtechnik.iwes.fraunhofer.de/de/presse-infothek/publikationen/uebersicht/2012/-_leitstudie-2011---langfristszenarien-und-strategien-fuer-den-a.html.Google Scholar
Nolt, J. 2009. “The Move from Is to Good in Environmental Ethics.” Environmental Ethics 31 (2): 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolt, J. 2010. “Hope, Self-Transcendence and Environmental Ethics.” Inquiry 53 (2): 162–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolt, J. 2013a. “Comparing Suffering Across Species.” Between the Species 16 (1): 86–104.Google Scholar
Nolt, J. 2013b. “Anthropocentrism and Egoism.” Environmental Values 22 (4): 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normile, D. 2012. “Commission Spreads Blame for ‘Manmade’ Disaster.” Science 337 (6091): 143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NRC (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission). 1975. Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in US Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (WASH-1400). US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.Google Scholar
NRC. 1989. “Letter submitted by James G. Partlow, Associate Director of Projects, NRC to All Holders of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Reactors with Mark 1 Containments on Installation of a Hardened Wetwell Vent.” (generic letter 89–16). US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. September 1. http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/02/16/nrc.gl.89.16.pdf.Google Scholar
NRC. 2001. “Review of Findings for Human Error Contribution to Risk in Operating Events.” NUREG INEEL/EXT-01–01166. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, August 2001. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
NRC. 2007. “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Final Report.” US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (NUREG-1437, 29).Google Scholar
NRC. 2011a. “Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Regarding Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post Fukushima.” Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1. (ADAMS Accession No. ML111320647).Google Scholar
NRC. 2011b. “Ruling on Energy’s Motion for Summary Disposition of Pilgrim Watch Contention 1, Regarding Adequacy of Aging Management Program for Buried Pipes and Tanks and Potential Need for Monitoring Wells to Supplement Program.” Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 12. (Accession # ML061630125).Google Scholar
NRC. 2014a. “1Q/2014 Plant Inspection Findings 2013–2014.” US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PILG/pilg_pim.html.Google Scholar
NRC. 2014b. “Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.” US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Last modified April 23. www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/pilg.html.Google Scholar
NRC and DOE (Department of Energy). 2008. “Life Beyond 60 Workshop Summary Report, NRC/DOE Workshop on U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Life Extension Research and Development.” US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. February 19–21.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. 2001. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
NWMO (Nuclear Waste Management Organization). 2005. Choosing a Way Forward; The Future Management of Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel (Final Study). Ottawa (Ontario), Canada: Nuclear Waste Management Organization. www.nwmo.ca/studyreport.Google Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2010. “Comparing Nuclear Accident Risks with Those from Other Energy Sources.” Nuclear Energy Agency Report 6861. Paris: OECD Publications. www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/reports/2010/nea6862-comparing-risks.pdfGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2012. Uranium 2011: Resources, Production and Demand: A Joint Report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency 2012. Paris: OECD Publications. https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2012/7059-uranium-2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Oels, A. 2005. “Rendering Climate Change Governable: From Biopower to Advanced Liberal Government.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7 (3): 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, S. 2007. “Rational Choice, Risk Aversion, and Evolution.” Journal of Philosophy 104: 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, S. 2011. “Optimal Choice in the Face of Risk: Decision Theory Meets Evolution.” Philosophy of Science 78: 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okrent, D. 1978. On the History of the Evolution of Light Water Reactor Safety in the United States. http://fissilematerials.org/library/1978/06/on_the_history_of_the_evolutio.htmlGoogle Scholar
Okrent, D. and Pidgeon, N.. 2000. “Special Collection on Intergenerational Versus Intragenerational Equity and Risk Policy.” Risk Analysis 20 (6): 759–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orcutt, M. 2014. “Why Japan’s Government Is Bringing Nuclear Back.” MIT Technology Review. www.technologyreview.com/news/525421/the-numbers-behind-japans-renewed-embrace-of-nuclear/.Google Scholar
O’Riordan, T. and Cameron, J., eds. 1994. Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
O’Riordan, T., Cameron, J., and Jordan, A., eds. 2001. Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
Osnos, E. 2011. “The Fallout. Seven Months Later: Japan’s Nuclear Predicament.” The New Yorker, October 17: 26–61.Google Scholar
Oughton, D. and Hansson, S.O.. 2013. Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk Management, Radioactivity in the Environment 19. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Page, E. 2008. “Distributing the Burdens of Climate Change.” Environmental Politics 17 (4): 556–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhill, K.A., Pidgeon, N., Henwood, K.L., Simmons, P., and Venables, D.. 2010. “From the Familiar to the Extraordinary: Local Residents’ Perceptions of Risk when Living with Nuclear Power in the UK.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35: 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhill, K.A., Henwood, K.L., Pidgeon, N., and Simmons, P.. 2011. “Laughing It Off: Humour, Affect and Emotion Work in Communities Living with Nuclear Risk.” British Journal of Sociology 62 (2): 324–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, E. ed. 1980. Responsibilities to Future Generations. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Paté-Cornell, M.E. 1996. “Uncertainties in Risk Analysis: Six Levels of Treatment.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 54: 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, T. 2013. “Climate change warriors: It’s time to go nuclear.” CNN, April 14. www.cnn.com/2013/11/03/world/nuclear-energy-climate-change-scientists/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Perin, C. 2005. Shouldering Risks: The Culture of Control in the Nuclear Power Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 1999. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 2007. The Next Catastrophe: Reducing Our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 2011. “Fukushima and the Inevitability of Accidents.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67 (6): 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, A.J. 2008. “Occupational and Non-Occupational Health Risks: Can Double Standards Be Justified?” International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 10: 160–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M.B. 2013. “New Technologies Should Not Be Treated as Social Experiments.” Ethics, Policy & Environment 16: 349–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petroski, H. 1992. To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, N. 1998. “Risk Assessment, Risk Values and the Social Science Programme: Why We Do Need Risk Perception Research.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59: 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pidgeon, N. and Butler, C.. 2009. “Risk Analysis and Climate Change.” Environmental Politics 18 (5): 670–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pidgeon, N. and Demski, C.C.. 2012. “From Nuclear to Renewable: Energy System Transformation and Public Attitudes.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68 (4): 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pidgeon, N., Hood, C., Jones, D., Turner, B.A., and Gibson, R.. 1992. “Risk Perception.” In Risk – Analysis, Perception and Management: Report of a Royal Society Study Group, edited by Warner, E., 89–34. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, N., Henwood, K.L., Irwin, A., Parkhill, K.A., and Venables, D.. 2007. “Gender and Risk Perception: A Secondary Analysis.” End of Award Report RES 160-25-0046. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, N., Lorenzoni, I., and Poortinga, W.. 2008. “Climate Change or Nuclear Power – No Thanks! A Quantitative Study of Public Perceptions and Risk Framing in Britain.” Global Environmental Change 18: 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T. 1993. “‘Testing – One, Two, Three … Testing!’: Toward a Sociology of Testing.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 18 (1): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T and Bijker, W.. 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Social Studies of Science 14: 339–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittock, A.B., Ackerman, T.P., Crutzen, P.J., MacCracken, M.C., Shapiro, C.S., and Turco, R.P.. 1986. Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War, Volume I: Physical and Atmospheric Effects. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., Capstick, S., and Aoyagi, M.. 2013. Public Attitudes to Nuclear Power and Climate Change Two Years after the Fukushima Disaster. London: UK Energy Research Centre.Google Scholar
Potter, V.R. 1970. “Bioethics: The Science of Survival.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 14: 127–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintana, M. 2012. “Fukushima Crisis Concealed: Japanese Government Kept Worst-Case Scenario Under Wraps.” The Asia Pacific Journal, January 31. http://japanfocus.org///events/view/129.Google Scholar
Ramana, M.V. 2011. “Beyond Our Imagination: Fukushima and the Problem of Assessing Risk.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April 19. http://thebulletin.org/beyond-our-imagination-fukushima-and-problem-assessing-risk-0.Google Scholar
Randers, J. 2012. 2052: A Global Forecast for the Next Forty Years. A Report to the Club of Rome Commemorating the 40th Anniversary of The Limits of Growth. Chelsea: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K., and Leplat, J., 1987. New Technology and Human Error. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Rauschmayer, F. and Lessmann, O.. 2011. “Assets and Drawbacks of the CA as a Foundation for Sustainability Economics.” Ecological Economics 70: 1835–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 2005. A Theory of Justice. Original ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, S. 2004. “The Novelty Trap: Why does Institutional Learning about New Technologies Seem So Difficult.” Industry and Higher Education 18 (5): 340–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, W.T. 1994. “The Word ‘Bioethics’: Its Birth and the Legacies of Those Who Shaped It.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4: 319–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, W.T. 1995. “The Word ‘Bioethics’: the Struggle Over Its Earliest Meanings.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5: 19–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiss, M.B. 2004. “The Nuclear Tipping Point: Prospects for a World of Many Nuclear Weapons States.” In The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices, edited by Campbell, K.M., Einhorn, R.J., and Reiss, M.B., 3–17. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Reitinger, C., Dumke, M., Barosevcic, M., and Hillerbrand, R.. 2011. “A Conceptual Framework for Impact Assessment Within SLCA.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16 (4): 380–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renn, O. 1998. “Three Decades of Risk Research: Accomplishments and New Challenges.” Journal of Risk Research. 1: 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renn, O. and Rohrmann, B.. 2000. Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, V. 1991. “USSR: Chernobyl’s Psychological Legacy.” Lancet 337 (8749): 1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, B. 2004. “The Public’s Right to Know: A Dangerous Notion.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (1): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rip, A. 1986. “The Mutual Dependence of Risk Research and Political Context.” Science & Technology Studies 4 (3/4): 3–15Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2005. “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey.” Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 94–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J.P. 1979. The Effects of Weapons on Ecosystems. United Nations Environment Programme, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Roeser, S. 2009. “The Relation Between Cognition and Affect in Moral Judgments About Risk.” In The Ethics of Technological Risk, edited by Asveld, L. and Roeser, S., 182–201. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Roeser, S. 2011. “Nuclear Energy, Risk, and Emotions.” Philosophy & Technology 24: 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., and Peterson, M.. 2013. Essentials of Risk Theory. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolston, H. III 1988. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadephia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, E.A. and Clark, D.L.. 1999. “Historical Routes to Technological Gridlock: Nuclear Technology As Prototypical Vehicle.” In Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, Vol 7, edited by Freudenberg, W.R. and Youn, T.I.K., 21–57. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, E.A. and Freudenberg, W.R.. 1993. “The Historical Development of Public Reactions to Nuclear Power: Implications for Nuclear Waste Policy.” In Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ Views of Repository Siting, edited by Dunlap, R.E., Kraft, M.E. and Rosa, E.A., 32–63. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Routley, R. and Routley, V.. 1981. “Nuclear Energy and Obligations to the Future.” In Responsibilities to Future Generations, edited by Partridge, E., 277–301. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Rowe, W.D. 1980. “Risk Assessment: Theoretical Approaches and Methodological Problems.” In Society, Technology, and Risk Assessment, edited by Conrad, J., 3–29. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. 2000. Energy: The Changing Climate. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Rytömaa, T. 1996. “Ten Years After Chernobyl.” Annals of Medicine 28 (2): 83–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sagoff, M. 1988. The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law and the Environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salpukas, A. 1998. “Entergy Bid of $80 Million Wins Massachusetts Nuclear Plant.” New York Times, November 20.Google Scholar
Sandler, R., and Pezzullo, P., eds. 2007. Environmental Justice and Environmentalism: The Social Justice Challenge to the Environmental Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saoshiro, S. and Layne, N.. 2011. “Pockets of High Radiation Remind of Fukushima Plant Danger.” Reuters News Service, August 2. www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/02/japan-nuclear-radiation-idUSL3E7J203D20110802.Google Scholar
Satterfield, T., Mertz, C.K., and Slovic, P.. 2004. “Discrimination, Vulnerability and Justice in the Face of Risk.” Risk Analysis 24: 115–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savchenko, V.K. 1995. The Ecology of the Chernobyl Catastrophe: Scientific Outlines of an International Programme of Collaborative Research. London/New York: UNESCO and The Parthenon Publishing Group Ltd.Google Scholar
Sayers, A. 2011. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and the Ethical Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. 2015. “The Practice of Equality.” In Social Equality: Essays on What it Means to be Equals, edited by Fourie, C., Schuppert, F., and Wallimann-Helmer, I., 21–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheman, N. 1993. “Introduction: The Unavoidability of Gender.” In Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority and Privilege, edited by Scheman, N., 1–8. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schlör, H., Fischer, W., and Hake, J.-F.. 2012. “Measuring Social Welfare, Energy and Inequality in Germany.” Applied Energy 97: 135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosberg, D. 2007. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlosberg, D. 2009. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, S. 2011. “When Safe Enough is Not Good Enough: Organizing Safety at Chernobyl.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67 (2): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, R.W., Stauffacher, M., Bösch, S., Krütli, P., and Wiek, A.. 2007. Entscheidungsprozesse Wellenberg – Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle in der Schweiz. ETH-UNS Fallstudie 2006. Zurich, Chur: Rüegger.Google Scholar
Schramme, T. 2006. “Is Rawlsian Justice Bad for the Environment?” Analyse & Kritik 28: 146–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuppert, F., and Wallimann-Helmer, I.. 2014. “Environmental Inequalities and Democratic Citizenship: Linking Normative Theory with Empirical Research.” Analyse & Kritik 36 (2): 345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, K. 2012. Public Meeting at Barnstable County Regional Emergency Planning Committee Harwich Community Center. October 3.Google Scholar
Senate Bill H.1906 188th – An Act increasing nuclear power plant protections to a twenty mile radius. https://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/House/H1906.Google Scholar
Senate Bill H.1907. 188th – An Act to amend Section 5K(E). https://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/House/H1907.Google Scholar
Senate Bill H.2045 188th – An Act increasing nuclear power plant protections to a twenty mile radius. https://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/House/H2045.Google Scholar
Senate Bill H.2046 188th – An Act relative to radiological air monitoring. https://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/House/H2046.Google Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, S. 1998. Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 1980. Nuclear Power and Public Policy. The Social and Ethical Problems of Fission Technology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S., ed. 1991a. Nuclear Energy and Ethics. Geneva: World Council of Churches Publications.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 1991b. “Nuclear Waste and Ethics.” In Nuclear Energy and Ethics, edited by Shrader-Frechette, K.S., 182–202. Geneva: World Council of Churches Publications.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 1991c. Risk and Rationality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 1993. Burying Uncertainty: Risk and the Case against Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 1994. “Equity and Nuclear Waste Disposal.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (2): 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 2000. “Duties to Future Generations, Proxy Consent, Intra- and Intergenerational Equity: The Case of Nuclear Waste.” Risk Analysis 20: 771–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 2002. Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 2005. Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 2007. Taking Action, Saving Lives: Our Duties to Protect Environmental and Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 2011a. What Will Work: Fighting Climate Change with Renewable Energy, Not Nuclear Power. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 2011b. “Fukushima, Flawed Epistemology, and Black-Swan Events.” Ethics, Policy & Environment 14: 267–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 2012. “Nuclear Catastrophe, Disaster-Related Environmental Injustice, and Fukushima.” Environmental Justice 5 (3): 133–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. 2013. “Environmental Injustice Inherent in Radiation Dose Standards.” Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk Management 19: 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. and Persson, L.. 2001. “Ethical Problems in Radiation Protection.” doi: ISSN0282–4434. www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/Global/Publikationer/Rapport/Stralskydd/2001/ssi-rapp-2001-11.pdf.Google Scholar
Shue, H. 1993. “Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions.” Law & Policy 15: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegrist, M. and Visschers, V.. 2013. “Acceptance of Nuclear Power: The Fukushima Effect.” Energy Policy 59: 112–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, S. 2009. “Taming Prometheus: Talk About Safety and Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology 35: 341–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöberg, L. and Drottz-Sjöberg, B.-M.. 2001. “Fairness, Risk and Risk Tolerance in the Siting of a Nuclear Waste Repository.” Journal of Risk Research 4 (1): 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. 1999. “Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield.” Risk Analysis 19: 689–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S.. 1982. “Why Study Risk Perception?” Risk Analysis 2(2): 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, A.W. 1921. “The Future of Sociology.” Publications of the American Sociological Society 15: 174–93.Google Scholar
Smith, B. 2007. Insurmountable Risks: The Dangers of Using Nuclear Power to Combat Global Climate Change. Bandon, OR: RDR Books.Google Scholar
Smoke, R. 1993. National Security and the Nuclear Dilemma: An Introduction to the American Experience in the Cold War, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sollie, P. and Düwell, M., eds. 2009. “Evaluating New Technologies: An Introduction.” In Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technology Developments, edited by Sollie, P. and Düwell, M., 1–8. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, C. 1969. “Social Benefits Versus Technological Risks.” Science 165 (3899): 1232–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffacher, M., Krütli, P., and Scholz, R.W.. 2008. Gesellschaft und radioaktive Abfälle: Ergebnisse einer schweizweiten Befragung. Zürich, Chur: Rüegger.Google Scholar
Stocker, T.F. 2013. “The Closing Door of Climate Targets.” Science 339: 280–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strickland, E. 2011. “24 Hours at Fukushima: A Blow-by-Blow Account of the Worst Nuclear Accident Since Chernobyl.” IEEE Spectrum special report: Fukushima and the Future of Nuclear Power. November. http://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/nuclear/24-hours-at-fukushima/0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgis, P. and Allum, N.. 2004. “Science in Society: Re-evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes.” Public Understanding of Science 13: 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgis, S. 2009. “Investigation: Revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety.” www.southernstudies.org/2009/04/post-4.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunder Rajan, K. 2005. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Susser, M. 1997. “Consequences of the 1979 Three Mile Island Accident Continued.” Environmental Health Perspectives 105 (6): 566–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Sweeney, P.D., and McFarlin, D.B.. 1993. “Workers’ Evaluations of the ‘Ends’ and the ‘Means’: An Examination of Four Models of Distributive and Procedural Justice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 55 (1): 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabandeh, A., Gardoni, P., and Murphy, C.. 2014. “Reliability-Based Capability Approach: A System Reliability Formulation for the Capability Approach.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Under Review.Google Scholar
Tabuchi, H. 2014. “Reversing Course, Japan Makes Push to Restart Dormant Nuclear Plants.” The New York Times, February 25. www.nytimes.com/2014/02/26/world/asia/japan-pushes-to-revive-moribund-nuclear-energy-sector.html.Google Scholar
Taebi, B. 2011. “The Morally Desirable Option for Nuclear Power Production.” Philosophy and Technology 24: 169–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taebi, B. 2012a. “Intergenerational Risks of Nuclear Energy.” In Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics and Social Implications of Risk, edited by Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P. and eterson, M., 295–318. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taebi, B. 2012b. “Multinational Nuclear Waste Repositories and Their Complex Issues of Justice.” Ethics, Policy & Environment 15 (1): 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taebi, B. and Kadak, A.C.. 2010. “Intergenerational Considerations Affecting the Future of Nuclear Power: Equity as a Framework for Assessing Fuel Cycles.” Risk Analysis 30 (9):1341–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taebi, B. and Kloosterman, J.L.. 2008. “To Recycle or Not to Recycle? An Intergenerational Approach to Nuclear Fuel Cycles.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14: 177–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taebi, B., and Kloosterman, J.L.. 2014. “Design for Values in Nuclear Technology.” In Handbook of Ethics, Values and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, edited by van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P.E., and Van de Poel, I. Springer.Google Scholar
Taebi, B., and van de Poel, I.R., eds. 2015. Socio-Technical Challenges of Nuclear Power Production and Waste Disposal in the Post-Fukushima Era. Special Issue of Journal of Risk Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taebi, B., Roeser, S., and van de Poel, I.. 2012. “The Ethics of Nuclear Power: Social Experiments, Intergenerational Justice, and Emotions.” Energy Policy 51: 202–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbott, E.O., Youk, A.O., McHugh-Pemu, K.P., and Zborowski, J.V.. 2000. “Mortality Among the Residents of the Three Mile Island Accident Area: 1979–1992.” Environmental Health Perspectives 108 (6): 545–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talbott, E.O., Youk, A.O., McHugh-Pemu, K.P., and Zborowski, J.V.. 2003. “Long Term Follow-Up of the Residents of the Three Mile Island Accident Area.” Environmental Health Perspectives 111 (3): 341–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tannenwald, N. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo: the United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P.W. 1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tengs, T., Adams, M., Pliskin, J., et al. 1995. “Five Hundred Life-Saving Interventions and Their Cost Effectiveness.” Risk Analysis 15 (3): 369–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teravainen, T., Lehtonen, M., and Martiskainen, M.. 2011. “Climate Change, Energy Security and Risk: Debating Nuclear New Build in Finland, France and the UK.” Energy Policy 39: 3434–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, J. and Kelley, H.. 1959. The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L.. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Törnblom, K.Y. and Jonsson, D.R.. 1985. “Subrules of the Equality and Contribution Principles: Their Perceived Fairness in Distribution and Retribution.” Social Psychology Quarterly 48: 249–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Törnblom, K.Y. and Vermunt, R.. 1999. “An Integrative Perspective on Social Justice: Distributive and Procedural Fairness Evaluations of Positive and Negative Outcome Allocations.” Social Justice Research 12 (1): 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, B.A. 1976. “The Organizational and Interorganizational Development of Disasters.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (3): 378–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, B.A. and Pidgeon, N.F.. 1997. Man-Made Disasters, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
UCS (Union of Concerned Scientists). 2006a. “Pilgrim Planned Outage Dec 1983 – Dec 1984.” September 18. www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/pilgrim-i.pdf.Google Scholar
UCS. 2006b. “Pilgrim Planned Outage Dates April 1986 – June 1989.” September 18. www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/pilgrim-ii.pdf.Google Scholar
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2007. Human Development Report 2007/2008. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
UNDP. 2013. 2013 Human Development Report. Human development index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/hdi/.Google Scholar
Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vandenbosch, R. and Vandenbosch, S.E.. 2007. Nuclear Waste Stalemate: Political and Scientific Controversies. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Vandenbosch, R. and Vandenbosch, S.E.. 2015. “Nuclear Waste Confidence: Is Indefinite Storage Safe?” Physics and Society 44 (1): 5–7.Google Scholar
van de Poel, I. 1998. Changing Technologies: A Comparative Study of Eight Processes of Transformation Of Technological Regimes. Enschede: University of Twente.Google Scholar
van de Poel, I. 2009. “The Introduction of Nanotechnology as a Societal Experiment.” In Technoscience in Progress: Managing the Uncertainty of Nanotechnology, edited by Arnaldi, S., Lorenzet, A. and Russo, F., 129–42. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
van de Poel, I. 2011. “Nuclear Energy as a Social Experiment.” Ethics, Policy & Environment 14 (3): 285–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Poel, I. Forthcoming. “Society as a laboratory to experiment with new technologies.” In Embedding and Governing New Technologies, edited by Stokes, E., Bowman, D. and Rip, A.. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing.Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D.P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G.C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Masui, T., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Smith, S.J., and Rose, S.K.. 2011. “The Representative Concentration Pathways: An Overview.” Climatic Change 109 (1–2): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varner, G.E. 2012. Personhood, Ethics and Animal Cognition: Situating Animals in Hare’s Two-Level Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victorin, K. 1991. Gränsvärden – vad de innebär och hur myndigheterna använder dem. [Exposure Limits – What They Mean and How the Authorities Use Them.] Rapport från Kemikalieinspektionen 13/91. Stockholm: Kemikalieinspektionen.Google Scholar
Viel, J.F. and Pobel, D.. 1997. “Case-Control Study of Leukaemia Among Young People Near La Hague Nuclear Reprocessing Plant: The Environmental Hypothesis Revisited.” British Medical Journal 314 (7074): 101–06.Google Scholar
Viel, J.F., Pobel, D., and Carre, A.. 1995. “Incidence of Leukemia in Young People around the La Hague Nuclear Waste Reprocessing Plant.” Statistics in Medicine 14: 2459–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Hippel, F.N. 2011. The Radiological and Psychological Consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67 (5): 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, M. 1998. “Management Cited at 16 ‘Problem’ Nuclear Plants.” New York Times, July 16.Google Scholar
Walker, H.A., and Willer, D.. 2007. “Experiments and the Science of Sociology.” In Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences, edited by Webster, M. and Sell, J., 25–55. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Walker, W.E., Harremoes, P., Rotmans, J., van der Sluijs, J.P., van Asselt, M.B.A., Janssen, P., and von Krauss, M.P. Krayer. 2003. “Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support.” Integrated Assessment 4: 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, J.W., ed. 1989. War No More? Options in Nuclear Ethics. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 2000. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. and Chen, X.. 2012. “Regulatory Failures for Nuclear Safety – the Bad Example of Japan.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 16 (5): 2610–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, W. and Sumner, D.. 1996. “Measurement of Radioactivity in People Living Near the Dounreay Nuclear Establishment, Caithness, Scotland.” International Journal of Radiation Biology 70 (2): 117–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weart, S. 1988. Nuclear Fear: A History of Images. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, M., and Sell, J.. 2007. “Why Do Experiments?” In Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences, edited by Webster, M. and Sell, J., 5–23. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Webster, R. 2008. “Testimony Submitted by Richard Webster, Legal Director, Eastern Environmental Law Center to the Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety, Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate.” July 16. www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/licensing/20080710testimonyrenrcreform.pdf.Google Scholar
Weingart, P., Engels, A., and Pansegrau, P.. 2000. “Risks of Communication: Discourses of Climate Change in Science, Politics and the Mass Media.” Public Understanding of Science 9: 261–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, T.G., Forsythe, D.P., Coate, R.A., and Pease, K.K.. 2010. The United Nations and Changing World Politics. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werlin, K. 2008. “Department Approves Divestiture of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.” Find Law, March 26. http://corporate.findlaw.com/law-library/department-approves-divestiture-of-pilgrim-nuclear-power-station.html.Google Scholar
Wester, M. 2012. “Risk and Gender: Daredevils and Ecoangels.” In Handbook of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., and Peterson, M., 1030–48. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Westing, A.H. 2013. Arthur H. Westing: Pioneer on the Environmental Impact of War. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, L. and Lawson, B., eds. 2001. Faces of Environmental Racism: Confronting Issues of Global Justice. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. 1986. “Interpretive Repertoires and Literary Criticism: New Directions in the Social Psychology of Gender.” In Feminist Social Psychology, edited by Wilkinson, S., 77–95. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. 1996. “Life Histories, Social Histories.” Identities, Groups and Social Issues, 299–361. London: Sage (in association with the Open University).Google Scholar
Whitney, M. 2012. “Is Fukushima’s Doomsday Machine About To Blow?” Eurasia Review, April20. www.eurasiareview.com/20042012-is-fukushimas-doomsday-machine-about-to-blow-oped/.Google Scholar
Whitmore, T., ed. 1989. Ethics in the Nuclear Age: Strategy, Religious Studies, and the Churches. 1st ed. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar
WHO. 2006a. Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident and Special Health Care Programmes. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
WHO. 2013. WHO Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013: Supporting a Decade of Action. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Wigley, D. and Shrader-Frechette, K.S.. 1996. “Environmental Justice: A Louisiana Case Study.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9 (1): 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikman, P. 2004. “Trivial Risks and the New Radiation Protection System.” Journal of Radiological Protection 24: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wikman-Svahn, P. 2012. “Radiation Protection Issues Related to the Use of Nuclear Power.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 1 (3): 256–69. doi:10.1002/wene.22. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/wene.22.Google Scholar
Wikman-Svahn, P., Peterson, M. and Hansson, S.O.. 2006. “Principles of Protection: A Formal Approach for Evaluating Dose Distributions.” Journal of Radiological Protection 26: 69–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, D. and Baverstock, K.. 2006. “Too Soon For A Final Diagnosis.” Nature 440: 993–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williford, M. 1975. “Bentham on the Rights of Women.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L. 2000. Nuclear Waste: Exploring the Ethical Dilemmas. Toronto: United Church Publishing House.Google Scholar
Wing, S. 1995. “Affidavit in TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated II, Civil Action No 1: CV-88–1452.” Harrisburg, PA: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Wing, S. 2003. “Objectivity and Ethics and Environmental Health Science.” Environmental Health Perspectives 111 (14): 1809–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, S., Richardson, D., and Armstrong, D.. 1997. “A Re-Evaluation of Cancer Incidence Near the Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant.” Environmental Health Perspectives 105 (1): 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittner, L.S. 2009. Confronting the Bomb: A Short History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
WNA (World Nuclear Association). 2008a. Chernobyl Accident. http://world-nuclear.org/info/chernobyl/inf07.html.Google Scholar
WNA. 2009. Health Impacts, Chernobyl Accident. London: WNA. www.world-nuclear.org/info/Safety-and-Security/Safety-of-Plants/Appendices/Chernobyl-Accident---Appendix-2--Health-Impacts/.Google Scholar
WNA. 2010. Renewable Energy and Electricity. www.world-nuclear.org/info/Energy-and-Environment/Renewable-Energy-and-Electricity/.Google Scholar
WNA. 2014. Chernobyl Accident, 1986. www.world-nuclear.org/info/Safety-and-Security/Safety-of-Plants/Chernobyl-Accident/.Google Scholar
Wolf, D. 2014. “Senator Wolf Wants Pilgrim Nuclear Plant Shuttered.” Plymouth Wicked Local, February 28. http://plymouth.wickedlocal.com/article/20140228/NEWS/140226014/0/SEARCH.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2003. “Experimentation, Causal Inference and Instrumental Realism.” In The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, edited by Radder, H., 87–118. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Nuclear News. 2012. The Health Effects of Fukushima. www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_The_health_effects_of_Fukushima_2808121.html.Google Scholar
Wright, S., Smith, J., Beresford, N., and Scott, W.. 2003. “Monte-Carlo Prediction of Changes in Areas of West Cumbria Requiring Restrictions on Sheep Following the Chernobyl Accident.” Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 42 (1): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrixon, A.D. 2008. “New ICRP Recommendations.” Journal of Radiological Protection: Official Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection 28 (2): 161–68. doi:10.1088/0952–4746/28/2/R02.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature). 2011. The Energy Report, 100% Renewable Energy by 2050. http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/climate_carbon_energy/energy_solutions22/renewable_energy/sustainable_energy_report/.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. 1983. “Redefining the Issues of Risk and Public Acceptance: The Social Viability of Technology.” Futures 15 (1): 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, B. 1992. “Uncertainty and Environmental Learning: Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Paradigm.” Global Environmental Change 2 (2): 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablokov, A.V., Nesterenko, V.B., Nesterenko, A.V., and Sherman-Nevinger, J.D.. 2009. Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Malden, MA: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Yang, J.L. 2011. “Nuclear Experts Weigh in on GE Containment System.” Washington Post, March 14. www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/nuclear-experts-weigh-in-on-ge-containment-system/2011/03/14/ABspN1V_story.html.Google Scholar
Zakharov, V.M. 1988. Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe. Detroit: International Scholars.Google Scholar
Zeebe, R.E. 2013. “Time-Dependent Climate Sensitivity and the Legacy of Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (34): 13739–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeebe, R.E. and Zachos, J.C.. 2013. “Long-Term Legacy of Massive Carbon Input to the Earth System: Anthropocene Versus Eocene.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 371: 20120006. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellor, T. Jr 2011. “Experts Had Long Criticized Potential Weakness in Design of Stricken Reactor.” New York Times, March 15.Google Scholar