Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:21:34.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Medical futility

from Part III - Controversies in health care ethics: treatment choices at the beginning and at the end of life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

John C. Moskop
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Case example

Dr. Tyson is a general pediatrician in private practice. He is caring for Gail, a 5-week-old infant who presented to his office three weeks ago when her parents became concerned about her decreased feeding and apparent weakness. The parents reported that they were told that Gail was normal and healthy when they took her home from the hospital. Gail is a pretty baby girl, but Dr. Tyson's initial physical examination three weeks ago revealed that she was seriously ill. She had an elevated respiratory rate and very poor muscle tone.

Dr. Tyson was concerned about a life-threatening infection and so began a course of antibiotics immediately and admitted Gail to the hospital. While in the hospital, her respiratory condition worsened, and she was intubated and placed on a ventilator. No infection was discovered, but a muscle biopsy revealed tragic news: Gail has a rare and incurable genetic disease called fatal infantile myopathy. This condition is caused by a genetic mutation in the mitochondria of the muscles that leads to progressive weakness and death, usually within six months. Dr. Tyson shared this diagnosis with Gail's parents and grandparents and grieved with them.

At a subsequent family meeting, Gail's parents and grandfather (who is a pastor at a local church) told Dr. Tyson that they were praying for Gail's recovery and believed that God would not allow her to die. Dr. Tyson replied that he wished that Gail could be cured, but that he believed that Gail's illness was incurable and that she would die soon, with or without the current treatment measures. He voiced his concern about the pain and suffering associated with artificial ventilation, needle sticks, feeding tubes, and other interventions required to keep Gail alive. Dr. Tyson recommended removing the ventilator, but the family rejected this recommendation. The family did seek the advice of a theologian from a nearby Bible college. The theologian listened to Dr. Tyson's and the family's views, and acknowledged the difficulty of the situation, but offered no solution. How should Dr. Tyson proceed?

The rise of the futility debate

As described in Chapters 15 and 16, a series of US court decisions in the 1970s and 1980s established patient rights to refuse life-prolonging medical treatment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics and Health Care
An Introduction
, pp. 242 - 251
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. 1999. Medical futility in end-of-life care. JAMA 281: 937–941.
Helft, Paul R., Siegler, Mark, and Lantos, John. 2000. The rise and fall of the futility movement. New England Journal of Medicine 343: 293–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneiderman, Lawrence J., Jecker, Nancy S., and Jonsen, Albert R. 1990. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Annals of Internal Medicine 112: 949–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Truog, Robert D., Brett, Allan S., and Frader, Joel. 1992. The trouble with futility. New England Journal of Medicine 326: 1560–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Medical futility
  • John C. Moskop, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Ethics and Health Care
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058575.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Medical futility
  • John C. Moskop, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Ethics and Health Care
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058575.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Medical futility
  • John C. Moskop, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Ethics and Health Care
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058575.021
Available formats
×