Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:16:17.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

53 - Balancing Profession with Ego

The Frailty of Tenure Decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

P. Christopher Earley
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Susan T. Fiske
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

While there are many challenges facing a developing scholar, one of the most salient issues is achieving tenure, or long-term institutional commitment. Of course, tenure is a consequence of being an effective scholar, educator, and colleague. To an individual, tenure provides a sense of security and the opportunity to pursue a research and educational agenda that may diverge from mainstream emphases, and thus to take on new risks and adventures. From an administrator’s perspective, such as that of a dean, and the personal perspective I’m presenting in this case, tenure represents a number of commitments made by an institution to a faculty member. Financially, tenure represents an investment in an individual easily amounting to $5.5 million in salary (conservatively based on 20 years of $200,000/year) and an additional $3 million in benefits in today’s dollars. Depending on specialization, a business school professor may be expected to earn $8–10 million in salary and benefits during a post-tenure career.

In terms of research, a positive tenure decision commits a faculty slot for a career that will both expand and limit the organization’s ability to respond to new market demands. A faculty member whose research remains stagnant and non-evolving commits critical resources of a university over a very long period in ways that might have been otherwise deployed. On the other hand, an innovative and dynamic scholar and educator who commits to an institution can create tremendous success and impact for a university.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Case Studies and Commentaries
, pp. 165 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×