We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2021
INTRODUCTION
The reform of the law on the confiscation of assets of crime in Germany (Sections 73 et seq. Criminal Code) came into force on 1 July 2017.
In the past, the confiscation of assets gained by criminal acts had been rarely applied by German criminal courts since the provisions were regarded as to be too complicated.
Even in cases of environmental criminal law, forfeiture and confiscation of criminal assets did not play a significant role in the past. Yet the courts’ actions are of major importance for an effective enforcement regime of environmental offences.
A general account of the year 2016 discloses about 16,000 investigation proceedings in Germany in the area of environmental criminal law. About 1,000 of them led to a conviction. Around 97 per cent of the convictions consisted in fines, and – correspondingly – only 3 per cent in convictions to a prison sentence. The great majority of cases, namely more than 75 per cent, concerned Section 326 of the German Criminal Code, that is the illegal handling and disposal of waste. Compared over the last decade, those numbers do not change significantly.
The main aim of the German legislator was therefore to simplify the existing provisions of asset recovery and to remove any inconsistencies and practical shortcomings in order to remedy the former reluctant approach of the criminal courts thereto.
Another reason for the rare application of the provisions on forfeiture in the German Criminal Code was undoubtedly the fact that German criminal law does not so far recognise criminal liability of companies.
On the other hand, the German system of penalties in regulatory offence law (Ordnungswidrigkeitenrecht) provides not only for the imposition of fines against companies, but also for the confiscation of proceeds of regulatory offences.
TYPE AND CHARACTER OF SANCTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES
WHICH CRIMINAL LAW SANCTIONS DOES DIRECTIVE 2008/99/EC GENERALLY REQUIRE?
The first issue to be determined is which sanctions in law Directive 2008/99/EC generally requires, and particularly whether Directive 2008/99/EC requires the Member States to implement an effective system of confiscation of assets and proceeds of crime.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
