Book contents
- Empirical BioethicsTheoretical and Practical Perspectives
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Empirical Bioethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Practical Perspectives
- 8 Practical Perspectives: An Introduction
- 9 Moral Improvement through Interactive Research: A Practice Example of Dialogical Empirical Bioethics
- 10 Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model: The Case of Ashley X
- 11 Theory and Practice of Democratic Deliberation in Bioethics Research
- 12 Feminist Empirical Bioethics
- 13 Lessons from Experience: Establishing and Running Interdisciplinary Mixed-Method Bioethics Research
- 14 Publishing Research in Empirical Bioethics: Quality, Disciplines and Expertise
- Index
- Books in the series
- References
10 - Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model: The Case of Ashley X
from Part II - Practical Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2017
Book contents
- Empirical BioethicsTheoretical and Practical Perspectives
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Empirical Bioethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Practical Perspectives
- 8 Practical Perspectives: An Introduction
- 9 Moral Improvement through Interactive Research: A Practice Example of Dialogical Empirical Bioethics
- 10 Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model: The Case of Ashley X
- 11 Theory and Practice of Democratic Deliberation in Bioethics Research
- 12 Feminist Empirical Bioethics
- 13 Lessons from Experience: Establishing and Running Interdisciplinary Mixed-Method Bioethics Research
- 14 Publishing Research in Empirical Bioethics: Quality, Disciplines and Expertise
- Index
- Books in the series
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Empirical BioethicsTheoretical and Practical Perspectives, pp. 159 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Allen, D.B., Kappy, M., Diekema, D., Fost, N. 2009. Growth-Attenuation Therapy: Principles for Practice. Pediatrics. 123(6):1556–1561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arras, J.D. 2007. The Way We Reason Now: Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics. In Steinbeck, B. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BBC. 2014. http://bbc.co.uk/dna/mbouch/F2322273?thread=3779612 [Accessed 3 February 2014].Google Scholar
BBC. 2008. http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?sortBy=1&threadID=5141&start=75&tstart=0&edition=2&ttl=20070110125922&#paginator [Accessed 16 April 2008].Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T., Childress, J.F. 2013. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, online at: www.bbc.co.uk/ouch/opinion/mining_the_disability_market.shtm.Google Scholar
Brosco, J. 2006. Growth Attenuation: A Diminutive Solution to a Daunting Problem. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 160(10):1077–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brulde, B. 2001. The Goals of Medicine: Towards a Unified Theory. Health Care Analysis. 9:1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Daniels, N. 1979. Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. Journal of Philosophy. 76:256–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGrazia, D. 2003. Common Morality, Coherence and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 13:219–230.Google ScholarPubMed
van Delden, J., van Thiel, G. 1998. Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative-Empirical Model in Bioethics. In van der Burg, W., van Willigenburg, T. (eds.), Reflective Equilibrium. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 251–259.Google Scholar
DePaul, M.R. 1993. Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods in Moral Inquiry. London/New York: Routledge. 145–146.Google Scholar
Diekema, D., Fost, N. 2010. Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Critics. The American Journal of Bioethics. 10(1):30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder Kittay, E. 2011. Forever Small: The Strange Case of Ashley X. Hypatia. 26(3):610–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Graaf, R. 2009. Clarifying Appeals to Dignity in Medical Ethics from a Historical Perspective. Bioethics. 23(3):151–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Guardian. 2014. www.theguardian.com/society/2012/mar/15/ashley-treatment-rise-amid-concerns/print [Accessed 16 October 2014].Google Scholar
Gunther, D.F., Diekema, D.S. 2006. Attenuating Growth in Children with Profound Developmental Disability. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 160(10):1013–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. 2001. The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychology Review. 108(4):814–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaacs, D.A., Tobin, B.C., Hamblin, J.D., Slaytor, E.D., Donaghue, K.C.B., Munns, C.B., Kilham, H.A.A.C. 2011. Managing Ethically Questionable Parental Requests: Growth Suppression and Manipulation of Puberty (Review). Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 47(9):581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J. 2014. A Method of Reflexive Balancing in a Pragmatic, Interdisciplinary and Reflexive Bioethics. Bioethics. 28(6):302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J., Draper, H. 2009. Appropriate Methodologies for Empirical Bioethics: It’s All Relative. Bioethics. 23:249–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ives, J., Draper, H., Pattinson, H., Williams, C. 2008. Becoming a Father/Refusing Fatherhood: An Empirical Bioethics Approach to Paternal Responsibilities and Rights. Clinical Ethics. 3(2):75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khushf, G. 2007. An Agenda for Future Debate on Concepts of Health and Disease. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 10:19–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, C. 2006. The Method of Reflective Equilibrium: Wide, Radical, Fallible, Plausible. Philosophical Papers. 35(2):205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MSNBC Message Board. 2008. http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?BoardID=762&ThreadID=115796&BoardsParam=HIPDelay%3d1 [Accessed 16 April 2008].Google Scholar
MSNBC Message Board. 2007. Message #1861MSNBC Message Board, posted 01/06/07 11:02 PM. http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?BoardID=762&ThreadID=115796&BoardsParam=HIPDelay%3d1 [Accessed 16 April 2008].Google Scholar
Musschenga, A.W. 2008. Moral Judgement and Moral Reasoning: A Critique of Jonathan Haidt. In Düwell, M. et al. (eds.), The Contingent Nature of Life. Bioethics and the Limits of Human Existence. Dordrecht: Springer. 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, K. 1982. Grounding Rights and a Method of Reflective Equilibrium. Inquiry. 25:277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordenfelt, N. 2007. The Concepts of Health and Illness Revisited. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 10:5–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordenfelt, N. 2004. The Varieties of Dignity. Health Care Analysis. 12:69–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersson, B. 1998. Wide Reflective Equilibrium and the Justification of Moral Theory. In van der Burg, W., Willigenburg, T. (eds.), Reflective Equilibrium. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 132.Google Scholar
Rauprich, O. 2008. Common Morality: Comment on Beauchamp and Childress. Theor Med Bioeth. 29:43–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawls, J.A. 1999. Theory of Justice (revised ed.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press. xiii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, J. 2007. Problems with Theory, Problems with Practice: Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Bioethics. South African Journal of Philosophy. 26:204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. 1996. Coherentist Epistemology and Moral Theory. In Sinnot-Armstrong, W., Timmons, M. (eds.), Moral Knowlegde? New Readings in Moral Epistemology. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. 137–189.Google Scholar
Stein, G.J. 2010. Ashley’s Case: The Ethics of Arresting Growth of Children with Serious Disability. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation. 9:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, C. 2010. Theoretical and Practical Problems with Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 31:123–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanton, C. 1991. The Role Played by the Method of Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Moral Epistemology. Dialogue. 30:575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Thiel, G. 2009. Moral Wisdom in the Balance. Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model for Bioethics. Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
van Thiel, G., van Delden, J. 2010. Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model. Ethical Perspectives. 17(2):183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Thiel, G., van Delden, J. 2009. The Justificatory Power of Moral Experience. Journal of Medical Ethics. 35:234–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilfond, B.S., Miller, P.S., Korfiatis, C., Diekema, D.S., Dudzinski, D.M., Goering, S. 2010. Navigating Growth: Attenuation in Children with Profound Disabilities. Hastings Center Report. 40(6):27–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 6
- Cited by