Book contents
- Eminent Domain
- Reviews
- Eminent Domain
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Taking Law from an Economic Perspective with Reference to German Law
- 2 Eminent Domain in the United States
- 3 Direct Expropriation: Multi-Layered Legal Protection in Europe
- 4 Eminent Domain Law in Taiwan: New Law, Old Practice?
- 5 Compulsory Land Acquisition in Developing Countries: Shifting Paradigm or Entrenched Legacy?
- 6 Public Interest Criteria and Korea’s Scrutiny System
- 7 Who Exercises the Eminent Domain Power in Korea? A Focus on Private Takings
- 8 Just Compensation in Eminent Domain in Korea: From the Perspective of Fairness
- 9 Overall Due Process in Takings in Korea
- 10 Distribution of Development Surplus in Takings*
- 11 Takings, Disputes, and Resolutions in Korea: A Quantitative Review
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
6 - Public Interest Criteria and Korea’s Scrutiny System
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2017
By
Book contents
- Eminent Domain
- Reviews
- Eminent Domain
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Taking Law from an Economic Perspective with Reference to German Law
- 2 Eminent Domain in the United States
- 3 Direct Expropriation: Multi-Layered Legal Protection in Europe
- 4 Eminent Domain Law in Taiwan: New Law, Old Practice?
- 5 Compulsory Land Acquisition in Developing Countries: Shifting Paradigm or Entrenched Legacy?
- 6 Public Interest Criteria and Korea’s Scrutiny System
- 7 Who Exercises the Eminent Domain Power in Korea? A Focus on Private Takings
- 8 Just Compensation in Eminent Domain in Korea: From the Perspective of Fairness
- 9 Overall Due Process in Takings in Korea
- 10 Distribution of Development Surplus in Takings*
- 11 Takings, Disputes, and Resolutions in Korea: A Quantitative Review
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Eminent DomainA Comparative Perspective, pp. 156 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Hicks, John, 1939, “The Foundations of Welfare Economics.” Economic Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 696–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas, 1939, “Welfare Propositions in Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” Economic Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 549–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KDI, 2008, A Study on General Guidelines for Pre-feasiblity Study (5th edn), PIMAC, KDI (in Korean)Google Scholar
Kim, Iljoong, Cho, ByungKoo, Kim, Duol, Park, Sungkyu, Lee, Hojun, and Jung, Kisang, 2013, A Law-and-Economics Study on Takings Law in Korea, KDI (in Korean).Google Scholar
Kim, Jaehoon, and Lee, Hojun, 2013, Political Economy of Public Investment Management in Korea, KDI (in Korean).Google Scholar
Lee, A. Brian, 2013, Just Under-compensation: The Idiosyncratic Premium in Eminent Domain, Legal Studies Research Papers, Brooklyn Law School.Google Scholar
Lueck, Dean, and Miceli, Thomas J., 2007, “Property Law,” Chapter 3, Handbook of Law and Economics, Vol. 1, (edited by Polinsky, Mitchell and Shavell, Steven), Elsevier.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., 1986, “The Economics of Public Use,” Cornell Law Review 72, 61–116.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R., 1981, “Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A Generalization,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 26(February), 86–111.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, Burton A., Handler, Joel F., and Komesar, Neil K., 1978, Public Interest Law, University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar