Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- PART I POSITIVE GROWTH THEORY
- PART II OPTIMAL GROWTH THEORY
- 7 Optimal growth theory: an introduction to the calculus of variations
- 8 Other major tools for optimal growth theory: the Pontryagin maximum principle and the Dorfmanian
- 9 First applications to optimal growth
- 10 Optimal growth and the optimal savings rate
- PART III A UNIFIED APPROACH
- In conclusion: on the convergence of ideas and values through civilizations
- Further reading, data on growth and references
- Index
10 - Optimal growth and the optimal savings rate
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- PART I POSITIVE GROWTH THEORY
- PART II OPTIMAL GROWTH THEORY
- 7 Optimal growth theory: an introduction to the calculus of variations
- 8 Other major tools for optimal growth theory: the Pontryagin maximum principle and the Dorfmanian
- 9 First applications to optimal growth
- 10 Optimal growth and the optimal savings rate
- PART III A UNIFIED APPROACH
- In conclusion: on the convergence of ideas and values through civilizations
- Further reading, data on growth and references
- Index
Summary
The fall in the savings rate observed in most OECD countries in recent years propounds the perennial question of optimal savings, and foremost the problem of defining an optimality criterion. For nearly eighty years – since Frank Ramsey's seminal contribution (1928) – the fundamental problem of optimal savings policy has been to find the time path of capital accumulation maximizing, over a finite or an infinite horizon, the sum of discounted utility flows pertaining to consumption.
The Ramsey problem was a problem in the theory of optimal growth; unfortunately however, it remained in the realm of theory. No serious attempt to compare an optimal strategy of investment to the amounts actually invested in a given nation was ever carried out. In our opinion, this is due to the fact that the optimal paths resulting from the differential equations governing the motion of the economy were simply inapplicable because they implied unrealistic policies, in particular exceedingly high savings rates.
We hold that a fundamental reason for such a lack of applicability of the traditional model is the use of an arbitrary utility function. However, the idea of introducing a concave utility function cannot be dismissed outright because it has considerable intuitive appeal. Indeed, one could well envision (as many writers did) a benevolent planner for whom adding one more unit to consumption when total consumption is low has more value for society than when total consumption is high, and who therefore would have a bias toward giving more consumption to poorer generations; hence, one could feel well justified to use a concave utility function.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Economic GrowthA Unified Approach, pp. 233 - 258Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009