Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:16:53.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Jacob Weinrib
Jacob Weinrib
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Dimensions of Dignity
The Theory and Practice of Modern Constitutional Law
 , pp. 272 - 293
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Corey, and Fuller, Timothy. The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Charlottesville: Imprint Academic, 2005.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. “Higher Lawmaking.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford. 63–88. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. “Rooted Cosmopolitanism.” Ethics 104, no. 3 (1994): 516–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. We the People. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Lourens W.H. “The Legal Nature of the South African Constitutional Revolution.” New Zealand Law Review, no. 4 (2004): 633–79.Google Scholar
Ackermann, Lourens W. H. “The Soul of Dignity: A Reply to Stu Woolman.” In Constitutional Conversations, edited by Woolman, Stu and Bishop, Michael. 217–30. Pretoria: Pretoria University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Albert, Richard. “Nonconstitutional Amendments.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22, no. 1 (2009): 5–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander. “Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing.” Yale Law Journal 96, no. 5 (1987): 943–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert. The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert. “Discourse Theory and Human Rights.” Ratio Juris 9, no. 3 (1996): 209–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert. “Effects of Defects – Action or Argument? Thoughts about Deryck Beyleveld and Roger Brownsword’s Law as a Moral Judgment.” Ratio Juris 19, no. 2 (2006): 169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert. “On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison.” Ratio Juris 16, no. 4 (2003): 433–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert. “On Necessary Relations between Law and Morality.” Ratio Juris 2, no. 2 (1989): 167–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert. “On the Concept and the Nature of Law.” Ratio Juris 21, no. 3 (2008): 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert. “Thirteen Replies.” In Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, edited by Pavlakos, George. 333–66. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S. “Law, Justice and Integrity: The Paradox of Wicked Laws.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29, no. 4 (2009): 705–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., Chodorow, Marvin, and Pearce, Roy Harvey. “Progress and Its Discontents.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 35, no. 3 (1981): 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. “Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford. 89–116. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. “Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy: Comments on Schwartzman’s ‘Challenging Liberalism’.” Hypatia 24, no. 4 (2009): 130–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arad, Yitzhak, Gutman, Israel, and Margaliot, Abraham. Documents on the Holocaust: Selected Sources on the Destruction of the Jews of Germany and Austria, Poland, and the Soviet Union. 8th ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . “Politics.” Translated by Apostle, Hippocrates G. and Gerson, Lloyd P.. In Selected Works. 557–615. Iowa: The Peripatetic Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. Main Currents of Sociological Thought. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
Austin, John. Lectures on Jurisprudence, or, the Philosophy of Positive Law. New York: H. Holt, 1875.Google Scholar
Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. London: J. Murray, 1832.Google Scholar
Bagaric, Mirko, and Allan, James. “The Vacuous Concept of Dignity.” Journal of Human Rights 5 (2006): 257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak, Aharon. “Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right.” In Understanding Human Dignity, edited by McCrudden, Christopher. 361–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Barak, Aharon. “Proportional Effect: The Israeli Experience.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 57, no. 2 (2007): 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak, Aharon. Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak, Aharon. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” Israel Law Review 44 (2011): 321–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, David M. The Ultimate Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benda, Ernst. “Foreword by the Federal President.” In Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. 5–6. Berlin: Bundestag, 2001.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. A Fragment on Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Roger. “Dignity Jurisprudence: Building a New Law on Earth.” In The Dignity Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, edited by Cornell, Drucilla, Woolman, Stu, Fuller, Sam, Brickhill, Jason, Bishop, Michael, and Dunbar, Diana. 65–72. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold Joseph. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Bertea, Stefano. “How Non-Positivism Can Accommodate Legal Certainty.” In Law, Rights, and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, edited by Pavlakos, George. 69–82. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, David. “Does Balancing Adequately Capture the Nature of Rights?” South African Public Law 25 (2010): 423–44.Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Politik Als Wissenschaft. Stuttgart: Verlag der J.G. Cotta’schen Buchhandlung, 1876.Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, Edgar. “Significant Developments in German Legal Philosophy since 1945.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 3, no. 3 (1954): 379–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bois, François du. “Rights Trumped? Balancing in Constitutional Adjudication.” Acta Juridica (2004): 155–81.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline. New York: ReganBooks, 1996.Google Scholar
Bradley, K.R. Slavery and Society at Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, Arnold. Federalism and Regionalism in Germany – the Division of Prussia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Brison, Susan J. “The Autonomy Defense of Free Speech.” Ethics 108, no. 2 (1998): 312–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Christopher R. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York, N.Y.: Aaron Asher Books, 1992.Google Scholar
Brudner, Alan. “What Theory of Rights Best Explain the Oakes Test?” In The Limitation of Charter Rights: Critical Essays on R. V. Oakes, edited by Webber, Grégoire C.N. and Tremblay, Luc. 59–74. Montreal: Les Editions Themis, 2009.Google Scholar
Byk, Christian. “Is Human Dignity a Useless Concept?: Legal Perspectives.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Düwell, Marcus. 362–7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Caenegem, R.C.. An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, John C. “A Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States.” In John C. Calhoun: Selected Writings and Speeches, edited by Lee Cheek, H. Jr. 61–222. Washington: Regnery Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Calhoun, John C. “Slavery a Positive Good.” http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/slavery-a-positive-good/.Google Scholar
Campbell, Juan Colombo. “Constitutional Court Judges’ Roundtable.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 3, no. 4 (2005): 544–50.Google Scholar
Cancik, Hubert. “‘Dignity of Man’ and ‘Persona’ in Stoic Anthropology: Some Remarks on Cicero, De Officiis I 105–107.” In The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse, edited by Klein, Eckart and Kretzmer, David. 19–39. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar
Caplan, Arthur L. When Medicine Went Mad: Bioethics and the Holocaust. Totowa, N.J.: Humana Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro. “The Expanding Role of Judicial Review in Modern Societies.” In The Role of Courts in Society, edited by Shetreet, Simon. 79–96. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1988.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro. “Judicial Review in Comparative Perspective.” California Law Review 58, no. 5 (1970): 1017–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro. Judicial Review in the Contemporary World. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro. “Repudiating Montesquieu? The Expansion and Legitimacy of ‘Constitutional Justice’.” Catholic University Law Review 35 (1986): 1–32.Google Scholar
Carozza, Paolo G. “Human Dignity in Constitutional Adjudication.” In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Ginsberg, Tom and Dixon, Rosalind. 459–72. Cheltenham: Edward Elger, 2011.Google Scholar
Carozza, Paolo G. “Human Rights, Human Dignity, and Human Experience.” In Understanding Human Dignity, edited by McCrudden, Christopher. 615–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Chaskalson, Arthur. “From Wickedness to Equality: The Moral Transformation of South Africa Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003): 590–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaskalson, Arthur. “Human Dignity as a Constitutional Value.” In The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse, edited by Kretzmer, David and Klein, Eckart. 133–44. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar
Chaskalson, Arthur. “Human Dignity as a Foundational Value of Our Constitutional Order.” South African Journal on Human Rights 16 (2000): 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, Moshe, and Porat, Iddo. “Proportionality and the Culture of Justification.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 59, no. 2 (2011): 463–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules L., and Leiter, Brian. “Legal Positivism.” In A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, edited by Patterson, Dennis. 228–48. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1999.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules L., and Shapiro, Scott. The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, Thomas M. “The Power to Amend the Federal Constitution.” Michigan Law Journal 2 (1893): 109–20.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla, and Fuller, Sam. “Introduction.” In Dignity Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, edited by Cornell, Drucilla, Woolman, Stu, Fuller, Sam, Brickhill, Jason, Bishop, Michael, and Dunbar, Diana. 3–20. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Cotler, Irwin. “Jewish NGOS and Religious Human Rights: A Case Study.” In Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective, edited by Witte, John Jr. and van der Vyver, Johan D.. 235–94. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Currie, David P. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert Alan. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, Meir. “Introduction: Dignity and Its (Dis)Contents.” In Dignity, Rank, and Rights, edited by Dan-Cohen, Meir. 3–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, David Brion. The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Davis, Dennis. “Equality: The Majesty of Legoland Jurisprudence.” South African Law Journal 116 (1999): 398–414.Google Scholar
Deák, István. “Holocaust Views: The Goldhagen Controversy in Retrospect.” Central European History 30, no. 2 (1997): 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Duca, Louis, and Del Duca, Patrick. “An Italian Federalism? The State, Its Institutions and National Culture as Rule of Law Guarantor.” American Journal of Comparative Law 54 (2006): 1–48.Google Scholar
De Ste. Croix, G. E. M. The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World: From the Archaic Age to the Arab Conquests. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
de Toqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994.Google Scholar
Dietze, Gottfried. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Norms? Constitutional Development in Postwar Germany.” Virginia Law Review 42 (1956): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind. “Constitutional Amendment Rules: A Comparative Perspective.” In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Ginsberg, Tom and Dixon, Rosalind. 86–111. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar
Douglass, Frederick. “The Address of Southern Delegates in Congress to Their Constituents or, the Address of John C. Calhoun and Forty Other Thieves.” The North Star, February 9, 1849.Google Scholar
Douglass, Frederick. “Change of Opinion Announced.” The North Star, May 23, 1851.Google Scholar
Douglass, Frederick. Life and Times of Frederick Douglass. New York: Cosimo, 2008.Google Scholar
Dreben, Burton. “On Rawls and Political Liberalism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Freeman, Samuel. 316–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Dreier, Horst. “Human Dignity in German Law.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Düwell, Marcus. 375–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Dupré, Catherine. “Human Dignity in Europe: A Foundational Constitutional Principle.” European Public Law 19, no. 2 (2013): 319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürig, Günter. “An Introduction to the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.” In The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, edited by Karpen, Ulrich. 11–24. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. A Bill of Rights for Britain. London: Chatto & Windus, 1990.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Is Democracy Possible Here?: Principles for a New Political Debate. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 2006.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “Law’s Ambitions for Itself.” Virginia Law Review 71, no. 2 (1985): 173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “Thirty Years On.” Harvard Law Review 115 (2002): 1655–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “Constitutionalism in an Old Key: Legality and Constituent Power.” Global Constitutionalism 1 (2012): 229–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems: Pathologies of Legality. 2nd ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “How Hobbes Met the ‘Hobbes Challenge’.” The Modern Law Review 72, no. 3 (2009): 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order. Oxford: Hart, 1999.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, and Moran, Mayo. Calling Power to Account: Law, Reparations and the Chinese Canadian Head Tax Case. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, and Poole, Thomas. Hobbes and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, Julius. “The Law of Humanity and the Limits of State Power.” The Philosophical Quarterly 3, no. 10 (1953): 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, Edward J. “The German Idea of Freedom.” Oregon Review of International Law 10 (2008): 1–76.Google Scholar
Eberle, Edward J. “Human Dignity, Privacy and Personality in German and American Constitutional Law.” Utah Law Review (1997): 964–1056.Google Scholar
Eckert, Joern. “Legal Roots of Human Dignity in German Law.” In The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse, edited by Klein, Eckart and Kretzmer, David. 41–53. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar
Eddy, Katherine. “Against Ideal Rights.” Social Theory and Practice 34 (2008): 463–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisgruber, Christopher L. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, Jonathan, ed. Debates on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution. New York: Burt Franklin, 1888.Google Scholar
Enders, Christoph. “A Right to Have Rights – the German Constitutional Concept of Human Dignity in German Basic Law.” Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito 2, no. 1 (2010): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endicott, Timothy. “Proportionality and Incommensurability.” In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, and Reasoning, edited by Miller, Bradley W. Huscroft, Grant, Webber, Grégoire. 311–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. The Third Reich in History and Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ewing, K.D. “The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy.” Modern Law Review 62, no. 1 (1999): 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrand, Max, and Matteson, David Maydole, ed. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. 4 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Farrelly, Colin. “Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation.” Political Studies 55 (2007): 844–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favoreu, Louis. “Justicia Y Jueces Constitucionales.” Revista de Derecho Publico 61 (1999): 10–16.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. “Duty and Obligation in the Non-Ideal World by John Rawls.” The Journal of Philosophy 70, no. 9 (1973): 263–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreres, Víctor Comella. Constitutional Courts and Democratic Values: A European Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, M.I. Slavery in Classical Antiquity: Views and Controversies. Cambridge: W. Heffer, 1964.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G.P. “Human Dignity as a Constitutional Value.” University of Western Ontario Law Review 22 (1984): 171–82.Google Scholar
Ford, P.L., ed. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 10, 1899.Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory H., and Nolte, George. “Intolerant Democracies.” Harvard International Law Journal 36 (1995): 1–70.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. Translated by Shils, E.A., Lowenstein, Edith, and Knorr, Klaus. New York: Oxford University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Freehling, William W. The Road to Disunion. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. “Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review.” Law and Philosophy 9, no. 4 (1990): 327–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedländer, Saul. “From Anti-Semitism to Extermination: An Historiographical Study of Nazi Policies toward the Jews and an Essay in Interpretation.” Yad Vashem Studies 16 (1984): 1–50.Google Scholar
Friedländer, Saul. Nazi Germany and the Jews. New York: HarperCollins, 1997.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. “The Issue of Judicial Review in Germany.” Political Science Quarterly 43, no. 2 (1928): 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. “The Political Theory of the New Democratic Republic.” Review of Politics 12, no. 2 (1950): 215–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. “Rebuilding the German Constitution, II.” American Political Science Review 43 (1949): 704–20.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lisa L. “Burdened Societies and Transitional Justice.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15, no. 3 (2012): 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. “Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart.” Harvard Law Review 71, no. 4 (1958): 630–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. “Reason and Fiat in Case Law.” Harvard Law Review 59, no. 3 (1946): 376–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. “The Case for the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism.” German Law Journal 14, no. 12 (2013): 2229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. “The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism.” American Journal of Comparative Law 49 (2001): 707–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. “Reassessing the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 8, no. 2 (2010): 167–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John. “Legal Positivism: 5½ Myths.” The American Journal of Jurisprudence 46 (2001): 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlicki, Lech, and Garlicka, Zofia A.. “External Review of Constitutional Amendments? International Law as a Norm of Reference.” Israel Law Journal 44 (2011): 343–68.Google Scholar
Garner, James Wilford. Introduction to Political Science. New York: American Book Company, 1910.Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter. Ideas of Slavery from Aristotle to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto. “German Constitutional Law in Its Relation to the American Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 23, no. 4 (1910): 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, Pablo. “Global Justice and Poverty Relief in Nonideal Circumstances.” Social Theory and Practice 34 (2008): 411–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. “Political Ideals and Political Practice.” British Journal of Political Science 25, no. 1 (1995): 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goos, Christoph. “Würde Des Menschen: Restoring Human Dignity in Post-Nazi Germany.” In Understanding Human Dignity, edited by McCrudden, Christopher. 79–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Graumann, Sigrid. “Human Dignity and People with Disabilities.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Düwell, Marcus. 484–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie. The Authority of the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Leslie. “Law and Obligations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, edited by Coleman, Jules L., Shapiro, Scott, and Himma, Kenneth Einar. 514–47. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Griffin, Stephen M. “Constitutionalism in the United States: From Theory to Politics.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford. 37–62. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “The Achievement of Constitution and Its Prospects in a Changed World.” In The Twilight of Constitutionalism?, edited by Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin. 3–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “The Basic Law at 60 – Identity and Change.” German Law Journal 11 (2010): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “Constitutional Adjudication and Democracy.” Israel Law Review 33, no. 2 (2000): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “Dignity in a Legal Context: Dignity as an Absolute Right.” In Understanding Human Dignity, edited by McCrudden, Christopher. 381–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “Freedom of Speech in a Globalized World.” In Extreme Speech and Democracy, edited by Hare, Ivan and Weinstein, James. 11–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “German and American Constitutionalism: A Comparison.” The Berlin Journal 7 (2003): 8–12.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “Human Rights and Judicial Review in Germany.” In Human Rights and Judicial Review, edited by Beatty, David M.. 269–95. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 57, no. 2 (2007): 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “Values in German Constitutional Law.” Unpublished, on file with author.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldemann, Frank. “Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law.” Ratio Juris 18 (2005): 162–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Brenda. “Preface.” In Understanding Human Dignity, edited by McCrudden, Christopher. xv–xvii. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: Constitutional Courts as Guardians of the Constitution?” Constellations 19 (2012): 182–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, Dawson, Henry B., Jay, John, and Hamilton, John C.. The Federalist a Commentary on the Constitution of the United States: A Collection of Essays. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1864.Google Scholar
Harel, Alon. Why Law Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harel, Alon, and Kahana, Tsvi. “The Easy Core Case for Judicial Review.” Journal of Legal Analysis 2, no. 1 (2010): 227–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. “Legal and Moral Obligation.” In Essays in Moral Philosophy, edited by Melden, Abraham Irving. 82–107. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71, no. 4 (1958): 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havel, Václav. The Art of the Impossible: Politics as Morality in Practice: Speeches and Writings, 1990–1996. Toronto: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Burke A. “Where Should We Expect Social Change in Non-Ideal Theory?” Political Theory 41, no. 1 (2013): 116–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershovitz, Scott. Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Heyman, Steven J. “The Dark Side of the Force: The Legacy of Justice Holmes for First Amendment Jurisprudence.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 19 (2011): 661–723.Google Scholar
Hickman, Tom. “Proportionality: Comparative Law Lessons.” Judicial Review 12, no. 1 (2007): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himma, Kenneth Einar. “Positivism and the Problem of Explaining Legal Obligation.” American Philosophical Association Newsletter 5 (2006): 13–18.Google Scholar
Hinks, Peter P., McKivigan, John R., and Williams, R. Owen. Encyclopedia of Antislavery and Abolition. Greenwood Milestones in African American History. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. De Cive; or, the Citizen, edited by Lamprecht, Sterling P.. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan: With Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
Hogg, Peter W. Constitutional Law of Canada. 5th ed. 2 vols. Scarborough, Ont.: Thomson Carswell, 2007.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen, and Sunstein, Cass R.. “The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford. 275–306. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hughes, Anne. Human Dignity and Fundamental Rights in South Africa and Ireland. Pretoria: Pretoria University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hume, David. “Of the Original Contract.” In Essays, Moral, Political, Literary, edited by Miller, E.F.. 465–87. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1985.Google Scholar
Huscroft, Grant. “Proportionality and Pretense.” Constitutional Commentary 29, no. 2 (2014): 229–56.Google Scholar
Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire, eds. Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. A Revolution of the Mind: Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. “Abraham Lincoln ‘on This Question of Judicial Authority’: The Theory of Constitutional Aspiration.” Western Political Science Association 36 (1983): 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. “An Unconstitutional Constitution? A Comparative Perspective.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 4 (2006): 460–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, Stuart. “Ronald Dworkin: ‘We Have a Responsibility to Live Well’.” The Guardian, March 31, 2011.Google Scholar
Joly, Fábio Duarte. “Spartacus Revolt.” In Encyclopedia of Antislavery and Abolition, edited by Hinks, Peter, McKivigan, John, and Williams, R. Owen. 648–51. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Practical Philosophy. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. Human Dignity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Aileen. “Constitutional Review, the Courts, and Democratic Scepticism.” Current Legal Problems 62, no. 1 (2009): 102–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelbley, Charles L. “Are There Limits to Constitutional Change? Rawls on Comprehensive Doctrines, Unconstitutional Amendments, and the Basis of Equality.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 1487–536.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. An Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. “The Natural-Law Doctrine before the Tribunal of Science.” Western Political Science Quarterly 2 (1949): 481–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, Ian. Popular Opinion and Political Dissent in the Third Reich, Bavaria 1933–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Khosla, Madhav. “Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?: A Reply.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (2010): 298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, Matthias. “An Egalitarian Defense of Proportionality-Based Balancing: A Reply to Luc B. Tremblay.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 4 (2014): 891–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, Matthias, and Meister, Moritz. The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Claude. “Introduction.” Israel Law Review 44 (2011): 318–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Eckart. “Human Dignity in German Law.” In The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse, edited by Kretzmer, David and Klein, Eckart. 145–59. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 16, no. 1 (1999): 59–80.Google Scholar
Klemperer, Victor. I Will Bear Witness: A Diary of the Nazi Years. New York: Random House, 1998.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P. “The Basic Law: A Fifty Year Assessment.” In Fifty Years of German Basic Law: The New Departure for Germany, edited by AICGS Conference Report. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P. “German Constitutionalism: A Prolegomenon.” Emory Law Journal 40 (1991): 837–73.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P., and Miller, Russell A.. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. 3rd ed. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Koonz, Claudia. The Nazi Conscience. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “The Right to Lie: Kant on Dealing with Evil.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 15, no. 4 (1986): 325–49.Google Scholar
Kretzmer, David, and Klein, Eckart. The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnaswamy, Sudhir. Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Between Constitutional Triumphalism and Nostalgia, edited by Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin. 201–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. “Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice. Review of a Theory of Constitutional Rights, by Robert Alexy.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 2 (2004): 574–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. “The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review.” Law & Ethics of Human Rights 4 (2010): 141–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. “Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement.” In Law, Rights, and Discourse, edited by Pavlakos, George. 131–66. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. “Whose Right? Ronald Dworkin, Women, and Pornographers.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 19, no. 4 (1990): 311–59.Google Scholar
Laws, Sir John. “The Good Constitution.” Cambridge Law Journal 71, no. 3 (2012): 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian. “The Radicalism of Legal Positivism.” Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1568333.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. “Why Legal Positivism?” Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1521761.Google Scholar
Lenoir, J.J. “Judicial Review in Germany under the Weimar Constitution.” Tulane Law Review 14, no. 3 (1940): 361–83.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, ed. Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jacob T. “Not So Novus an Ordo: Constitutions without Social Contracts.” Political Theory 37, no. 2 (2009): 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limbach, Jutta. “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution.” The Modern Law Review 64, no. 1 (2001): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham. Abraham Lincoln: His Speeches and Writings. New York: Da Capo, 1946.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham. Collected Works, edited by Basler, Roy P.. 11 vols. New Brunswick, N.J., 1953.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. “The Concept of Constituent Power.” European Journal of Political Theory 13 (2014): 218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. The Idea of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, and Walker, Neil. The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, and Dobner, Petra. The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lunau, Henry. “The Threat of Nazi Law to All Fundamental Legal Principles.” Proceedings of the American Foreign Law Association 23 (1942): 1–11.Google Scholar
Lutz, Donald. “Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford. 237–76. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Mahlmann, Matthias. “The Basic Law at 60 – Human Dignity and the Culture of Republicanism.” German Law Journal 11 (2010): 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlmann, Matthias. “The Good Sense of Dignity: Six Antidotes to Dignity Fatigue in Ethics and Law.” In Understanding Human Dignity, edited by McCrudden, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Mahlmann, Matthias. “Human Dignity and Autonomy in Modern Constitutional Orders.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András. 370–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Mandela, Nelson. Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela. London: Abacus, 2009.Google Scholar
Marbury, William L. “The Limitations Upon the Amending Power.” Harvard Law Review 33 (1919): 223–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Douglas. “Sidney Morgenbesser, 82, Kibitzing Philosopher, Dies.” The New York Times, 2004.Google Scholar
Martin, Waldo E. Jr. The Mind of Frederick Douglass. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mason, Andrew. “Just Constraints.” British Journal of Political Science 34, no. 2 (2004): 251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, Christopher. “Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 19 (2008): 655–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes-Flohr, Paul R., and Reinharz, Jehuda. The Jew in the Modern World: A Documentary History. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Mertens, Thomas. “Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and Its Legal Traditions.” Ratio Juris 18 (2005): 285–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, Thomas. “Nazism, Legal Positivism and Radbruch’s Thesis on Statutory Injustice.” Law and Critique 14 (2003): 277–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerson, Denise. “Does the Constitutional Court of South Africa Take Rights Seriously? The Case of S v Jordan.” Acta Juridica (2004): 138–54.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. The Subjection of Women. New York: Dover, 1997.Google Scholar
Miller, Bradley W. “Proportionality’s Blind Spot: ‘Neutrality’ and Political Philosophy.” In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W. and Webber, Grégoire. 370–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles W. “‘Ideal Theory’ as Ideology.” Hypatia 20, no. 3 (2005): 165–84.Google Scholar
Möller, Kai. “Balancing and the Structure of Constitutional Rights.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (2007): 453–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morsink, Johannes. “World War Two and the Universal Declaration.” Human Rights Quarterly 15 (1993): 357–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moses, A.D. “Structure and Agency in the Holocaust: Daniel J. Goldhagen and His Critics.” History and Theory 37 (1998): 194–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. “The Secret History of Constitutional Dignity.” In Understanding Human Dignity, edited by McCrudden, Christopher. 95–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Müller, Ingo. Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich. Translated by Schneider, Deborah Lucas. London: Tauris, 1991.Google Scholar
Mureinik, Etienne. “A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights.” South African Journal on Human Rights 10 (1994): 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Liam B. Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. “Consent and Constitutional Change.” In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Jackson, Vicki C. and Tushnet, Mark. New York: Foundation Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. “Slaughter-House, Civil Rights, and Limits on Constitutional Change.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 32 (1987): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neiman, Susan. Moral Clarity: A Guide for Grown-up Idealists. Orlando, Fla.: Harcourt, Inc., 2008.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Nicolas. “Germany: The Electronic Eavesdropping Case.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 3 (2005): 680–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noorani, A.G. “Behind the ‘Basic Structure Doctrine’: On India’s Debt to a German Jurist.” Frontline 18 (2001), www.hinduonnet.com/fline/ fl1809/18090950.htm (last visited July 10, 2015).Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. On History and Other Essays. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar
Oliver, Dawn, and Fusaro, Carlo. “Towards a Theory of Constitutional Change.” In How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study, edited by Fusaro, Carlo and Oliver, Dawn. 405–34. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. “African Slavery in America.” Pennsylvania Journal and the Weekly Advertiser, March 8, 1775.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. The Rights of Man in Rights of Man, Common Sense, and Other Political Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Charles-Maxime. “In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (2011): 109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappe, H.O. “On the Validity of Judicial Decisions in the Nazi Era.” The Modern Law Review 23, no. 3 (1960): 260–74.Google Scholar
Patterson, Dennis M. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L. “On the Background and Significance of Gustav Radbruch’s Post-War Papers.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L. “Radbruch on Unjust Laws: Competing Earlier and Later Views?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15 (1995): 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, Stanley L. “Review of Law as a Moral Judgment, by Deryck Beyleveld and Roger Brownscord.” Ratio Juris 7 (1994): 111–16.Google Scholar
Pavlakos, George, ed. Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen. “Associative Obligations and the Obligation to Obey the Law.” In Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin, edited by Hershovitz, Scott. 183–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen. “Political Authority and Political Obligation.” In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, edited by Green, Leslie and Leiter, Brian. 1–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Pettit, Phillip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Phillips, Michael. “Reflections on the Transition from Ideal to Non-Ideal Theory.” Noûs 19, no. 4 (1985): 551–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pildes, Richard H. “Dworkin’s Two Conceptions of Rights.” The Journal of Legal Studies 29, no. 1 (2000): 309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Stephen. “The Stupidity of Dignity.” The New Republic, 28 May 2008.Google Scholar
Plato, . Complete Works. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. “Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism’?” In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Timmons, Mark. 133–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Preuss, Ulrich K. “The Implications of ‘Eternity Clauses’: The German Experience.” Israel Law Review 44 (2001): 429–48.Google Scholar
Quirk, Patrick. “An Australian Looks at German ‘Proportionality’.” University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review 1 (1999): 39–55.Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav. “Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy (1945).” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav. Kulturlehre Des Sozialismus Ideologische Betrachtungen. 4. Aufl ed. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum, 1970.Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav. “Legal Philosophy.” In The Legal Philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin, edited by Wilk, Kurt. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav. “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. “Lacking a Transformative Social Theory: A Response.” Stanford Law Review 45, no. 2 (1993): 409–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Neomi. “On the Use and Abuse of Dignity in Constitutional Law.” Columbia Journal of European Law 14, no. 2 (2008): 201–55.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas.” The Journal of Philosophy 92, no. 3 (1995): 132–80.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “Authority and Justification.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 14, no. 1 (1985): 3–29.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. Authority. Readings in Social and Political Theory. New York: New York University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “Kelsen’s Theory of the Basic Norm.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 19 (1974): 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Réaume, Denise G. “Limitations on Constitutional Rights: The Logic of Proportionality (August 2009).” Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 26/2009. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1463853; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1463853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, Anthony R. “Judicial Practical Reason: Judges in Morally Imperfect Legal Orders.” Law and Philosophy 30, no. 3 (2011): 319–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Donald H. “Glosses on Dworkin: Rights, Principles, and Policies.” Michigan Law Review 76, no. 8 (1978): 1213–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. “Authority and Coercion.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32, no. 1 (2004): 2–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, Ingrid. “Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice.” Social Theory and Practice 34 (2008): 341–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Michael. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Michael. “Dignity: The Case Against.” In Understanding Human Dignity, edited by McCrudden, Christopher. 143–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Roth, Götz Aly, and Heinz, Karl. “The Legalization of Mercy Killings in Medical and Nursing Institutions in Nazi Germany from 1939 until 1941.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 7 (1985): 145–63.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, and Cress, Donald A.. Basic Political Writings. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Roznai, Yaniv. “Legisprudence Limitations on Constitutional Amendments? Reflections on the Czech Constitutional Court’s Declaration of Unconstitutional Constitutional Act.” Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 7 (2014): 29–57.Google Scholar
Roznai, Yaniv. “Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments – the Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea.” American Journal of Comparative Law 61 (2013): 657–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, Kristen. “The Impossibility of an Exterminatory Legality: Law and the Holocaust.” University of Toronto Law Journal 59, no. 1 (2009): 65–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. Unpopular Essays. New York: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Albie. “South Africa’s Unconstitutional Constitution: The Transition from Power to Lawful Power.” St. Louis University Law Journal 41 (1997): 1249–57.Google Scholar
Sachs, Albie. The Strange Alchemy of Life and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech. “Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22, no. 2 (2002): 275–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. Democratic Theory. New York: Praeger, 1965.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar. “Compliance, Complicity, and the Nature of Nonideal Conditions.” The Journal of Philosophy 100, no. 7 (2003): 329–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleunes, Karl A. Legislating the Holocaust: The Bernard Loesener Memoirs and Supporting Documents. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Schlink, Bernard. “Proportionality in Constitutional Law: Why Everywhere but Here?” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 22, no. 2 (2012): 291–302.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, David. “Nonideal Theory: What It Is and What It Needs to Be.” Ethics 121, no. 4 (2011): 772–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Translated by Seitzer, Jeffrey. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The Basis of Morality. Translated by Bullock, Arthur Brodrick. New York: MacMillan, 1915.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. “What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?” The Journal of Philosophy 103, no. 5 (2006): 215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. “Human Dignity in Historical Perspective: The Contemporary and Traditional Paradigms.” European Journal of Political Theory 10, no. 1 (2011): 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott. Legality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott. “What Is the Internal Point of View?” Fordham Law Review 75 (2006): 1157–70.Google Scholar
Sher, George. Approximate Justice: Studies in Non-Ideal Theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
Shetreet, Shimon. The Role of Courts in Society. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff Publishers, 1988.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. Political Writings: Including the Debate between Sieyès and Tom Paine in 1791. Translated by Sonenscher, Michael. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 2003.Google Scholar
Silva, Virgílio Afonso da. “Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing, and Rational Decision.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31, no. 2 (2011): 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. “Ideal and Nonideal Theory.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 38, no. 1 (2010): 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. “Justification and Legitimacy.” Ethics 109, no. 4 (1999): 739–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. “The Principle of Fair Play.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 8, no. 4 (1979): 307–37.Google Scholar
Slynn of Hadley, Gordon, Andenæs, Mads Tønnesson, and Fairgrieve, Duncan. Judicial Review in International Perspective. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.Google Scholar
Smith, Eivind. “Old and Protected? On the ‘Supra-Constitutional’ Clause in the Constitution of Norway.” Israel Law Journal 44 (2011): 369–88.Google Scholar
Soper, Philip. “Dworkin’s Domain.” Harvard Law Review 100, no. 5 (1987): 1166–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabjee, Soli. “The Ideal Remedy: A Valediction.” In The Supreme Court Versus the Constitution, edited by Chopra, Pran. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2006.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, Gopal. “Non-Ideal Theory: A Taxonomy with Illustration.” In Global Justice and Bioethics, edited by Millum, Joseph and Emmanuel, Ezekiel J.. 135–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Stemplowska, Zofia “What’s Ideal About Ideal Theory?” Social Theory and Practice 34 (2008): 319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolleis, Michael. The Law under the Swastika: Studies on Legal History in Nazi Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Stone, Martin. “Legal Positivism as an Idea About Morality.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 61, no. 2 (2011): 313–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Mathews, Jud. “Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47 (2008): 73–165.Google Scholar
Swift, Adam. “The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances.” Social Theory and Practice 34 (2008): 363–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szente, Zoltan. “The Historic Origins of the National Assembly in Hungary.” Historia Constitutional 8 (2007): 228–44.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.C.W. “A Note on Ancient Attitudes Towards Slavery.” Analysis 43 (1983): 40–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Luc B. “An Egalitarian Defense of Proportionality-Based Balancing,” International Journal of Constitutional Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 4 (2014): 864–90.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence. The Invisible Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Trudeau, Pierre Elliot. The Essential Trudeau. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1998.Google Scholar
Tsakyrakis, Stavros. “Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7 (2009): 468–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrich, Dierk. “Concurring Visions: Human Dignity in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.” Global Jurist Frontiers 3, no. 1 (2003): 1535–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Aryeh L. “The Public Opinion Reports of the Nazi Party.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 29, no. 4 (1965): 565–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbina, Francisco J. “A Critique of Proportionality.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 57, no. 1 (2012): 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, Laura. “On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2009): 332–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter, and van der Vossen, Bas. “Libertarianism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N. (Fall 2014 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/libertarianism/.Google Scholar
Veel, Paul-Erik N. “Incommensurability, Proportionality, and Rational Legal Decision-Making.” Law and Ethics of Human Rights 4, no. 2 (2010): 178–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venter, Francois. Constitutional Comparison: Japan, Germany, Canada and South Africa as Constitutional States. Cape Town: Kluwer Law International, 2000.Google Scholar
von Krauss, Rupprecht. Der Grundsatz Der Verhältnismässigkeit in Seiner Bedeutung Für Die Notwendigkeit Des Mittels in Verwaltungsrecht. Hamburg, 1955.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case against Judicial Review.” Yale Law Journal 115, no. 6 (2006): 1346–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. Dignity, Rank, and Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?” Yale Law Journal 123, no. 6 (2014): 1692–1730.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Freeman’s Defense of Judicial Review.” Law and Philosophy 13, no. 1 (1994): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and the Conditions of Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 335–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Pildes on Dworkin’s Theory of Rights.” Journal of Legal Studies 29, no. 1 (2000): 301–7.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Positivism and Legality: Hart’s Equivocal Response to Fuller.” New York University Law Review 83 (2008): 1135–69.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13, no. 1 (1993): 18–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. Theories of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Walen, Alec. “Judicial Review in Review.” International Journal of Constitutional Law, no. 7 (2009): 329–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Ilan rua. “Notes on an ‘Open’ Constituent Power.” Law, Culture and the Humanities (2013): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. “Philosophy and Democracy.” Political Theory 9, no. 3 (1981): 379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, George. “Letter to Bushrod Washington, November 10, 1787.” In The Writings of George Washington, edited by Fitzpatrick, John C.. 309–12. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1944.Google Scholar
Webber, Grégoire C.N. The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Webber, Grégoire C.N. “Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2010): 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest Joseph. Corrective Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest Joseph. The Idea of Private Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Jacob. “Permissive Laws and the Dynamism of Kantian Justice.” Law and Philosophy 33 (2014): 105–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Lorraine E. “Canada’s Constitutional Revolution: From Legislative to Constitutional State.” Israel Law Review 33 (1999): 13–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Lorraine E. “‘Do Justice to Us!’ Jews and the Constitution of Canada.” In Not Written in Stone: Jews, Constitutions, and Constitutionalism in Canada, edited by Elazar, Daniel J., Brown, Michael, and Robinson, Ira. 33–68. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, Lorraine E. “Human Dignity as a Rights-Protecting Principle.” National Journal of Constitutional Law 17 (2004): 325–45.Google Scholar
Wermiel, Stephen J. “Law and Human Dignity: The Judicial Soul of Justice Brennan.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 7, no. 5 (1998): 223–39.Google Scholar
Westermann, William Linn. “Between Slavery and Freedom.” American Historical Review 50 (1945): 213–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Hugh Evander. Constitutional Law of the United States. Bloomington, Ind.: Principia Press, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan. An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. “Human Dignity, Right and the Realm of Ends.” Acta Juridica (2008): 47–65.Google Scholar
Woolman, Stu. “The Architecture of Dignity.” In The Dignity Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, edited by Woolman, Stu, Cornell, Drucilla, Fuller, Sam, Brickhill, Jason, Bishop, Michael, and Dunbar, Diana. 73–123. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Young, Alison L. “Proportionality Is Dead: Long Live Proportionality.” In Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, and Reasoning, edited by Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley W., and Webber, Grégoire. 43–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yowell, Paul. “Critical Examination of Dworkin’s Theory of Rights.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 52, no. 1 (2007): 93–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipursky, Benjamin C. “Legal Obligations and the Internal Aspect of Rules.” Fordham Law Review 75, no. 3 (2006): 1229–53.Google Scholar
Zucca, Lorenzo. Constitutional Dilemmas: Conflicts of Fundamental Legal Rights in Europe and the USA. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jacob Weinrib, New York University
  • Book: Dimensions of Dignity
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316026663.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jacob Weinrib, New York University
  • Book: Dimensions of Dignity
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316026663.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jacob Weinrib, New York University
  • Book: Dimensions of Dignity
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316026663.009
Available formats
×