Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T08:31:56.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Implications of Opportunity Theory for Combating Terrorism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

By
James P. Lynch
Edited by
Brian Forst ,
Jack R. Greene  and
James P. Lynch
Brian Forst
Affiliation:
American University, Washington DC
Jack R. Greene
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
James P. Lynch
Affiliation:
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Opportunity theory (OT) was an innovative approach to understanding why crime occurs, as well as how crime is distributed across people, places, time, and activities (Hindelang, Gottfredson, and Garafalo, 1978; Cohen, Felson, and Land, 1980). Prior to the appearance of OT, the typical approach to understanding crime was to determine why certain people were motivated to commit crime and others were not. The resulting criminological theories focused on the person, and specifically the criminal, as the unit of analysis, and sociological and psychological processes as the principal explanations for criminal motivation. OT in contrast, emphasized the occurrence of crime rather than criminal motivation as the phenomenon to be explained. The place or the situation is the unit of analysis, and characteristics of those places or situations explain when crime will occur and when it will not (Clarke, 1997).

OT was embraced immediately by applied criminologists and practitioners, because it seemed much simpler and easier to translate into policy than traditional criminological theory (Clarke, 1980; Felson and Clarke, 1998). Under the latter paradigm, crime could be affected only through the psychological and sociological processes that affected motivation. This was a long-term process that was imprecise in its outcome, and largely out of the control of criminal justice agencies that are often held accountable for crime and its distribution. OT gave these groups a way to understand the occurrence of crime that could be immediately translated into action.

Type
Chapter
Information
Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security , pp. 151 - 182
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addington, Lynn A. “Students Fear After Columbine: Findings from a Randomized Experiment.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 19, Number 4, 2003, pp. 367–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, David and Pease, Kenneth. “Biting Back: Preventing Repeat Burglary and Car Crime in Huddersfield.” In Clarke, Ronald V. (ed.) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. (2nd edition) (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Barr, Robert and Pease, Ken. “Crime placement, Displacement and Deflection.” In Tonry, Michael and Morris, Norval. (eds.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 12 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Becker, Howard. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. (New York: The Free Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Brown, Ben. “CCTV in Three Town Centers in England.” In Clarke, Ronald V. (ed.) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. (2nd edition) (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Chiricos, Theodore, Escholz, Sarah and Gertz, Mark. “Crime, News and Fear of Crime: Toward an Identification of Audience Effects.” Social Problems, Vol. 44, Number 3, 1997, pp. 342–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Ronald V. “Situational Crime Prevention: Theory and Practice.” British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 20, 1980, pp. 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Ronald V “Situational Crime Prevention: Its Theoretical and Practical Scope.” In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.) Crime and Justice, Vol. 4 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Clarke, Ronald V “Situational Crime Prevention.” In Tonry, Michael and Farrington, David (eds.) Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention. Crime and Justice, Vol. 19 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Clarke, Ronald VSituational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (2nd edition) (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Clarke, Ronald V. and Cornish, D.B.. “Modeling Offenders' Decisions: A Framework for Research and Policy.” In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.) Crime and Justice, Vol. 6 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Clarke, Ronald V. and Mayhew, Patricia. “The British Gas Suicide Story and Its Criminological Implications.” In Tonry, Michael and Morris, Norval (eds.) Crime and Justice, Vol. 10 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Clarke, R. and Newman, G. Outsmarting the Terrorists (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2006).Google Scholar
Cantor, David and Lynch, James P.. “Ecological and Behavioral Influences on Property Victimization at Home: Implications for Opportunity Theory.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 29, 1992, pp. 335–362.Google Scholar
Cohen, Larry and Felson, Marcus. “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach.” American Sociological Review, Vol. 44, 1979, pp. 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Lawrence and Cantor, David. “Residential Burglary Trends in the United States: Lifestyle and Demographic Factors Associated with the Probability of Victimization.” Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 18, 1981, pp. 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Lawrence, Felson, Marcus and Land, Kenneth. “Property Crime Rates in the United States: A Macrodynamic Analysis, 1947–1977: With Ex Ante Forecasts for the Mid-1980s.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 85, 1980, pp. 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiLeonardo, Robert L. “The Economic Benefits of Electronic Surveillance.” In Clarke, Ronald V. (ed.) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. (2nd edition) (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Dugan, Laura, Free, Gary and Piquero, Alex. “Testing a Rational Choice Model of Airline Highjackings.”Criminology, Vol. 43, Number 4, 2005, pp. 1031–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, W. and Sandler, T.. “Patterns of Transnational Terrorism, 1970–1999: Alternative Time-series Estimates.” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 46, Number 2, 2002, pp. 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felson, Marcus.Crime in Everyday Life (Thousand Oaks, CS: Pine Forge Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Felson, Marcus and Clarke, R.V. Opportunity Makes the Thief Practical Theory of Crime Prevention: Police Research series Paper 98 (London: The Home Office, 1998).Google Scholar
Guerette, Rob. “The Push and Pull Expansion of Situational Crime Prevention Evaluation: An Appraisal of Thirty-seven Years of Research.” Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 24, 2009, pp. 29–58.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Stephanie, Rohe, William and Williams, J.R.. Safe and Secure Neighborhoods: Physical Characteristics and Informal Territorial Control in High and Low Crime Neighborhoods (Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1982).Google Scholar
Heath, Linda and Gilbert, Kevin. “Mass Media and Fear of Crime.” American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 1996, pp. 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindelang, Michael, Gottfredson, Michael and Garafalo, James. Victims of Personal Crime (Cambridge, MA: Balinger, 1978).Google Scholar
Hesseling, R.B.P. “Displacement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” In: Clarke, R.V. (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 3 (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hope, Tim and Hough, Mike. “Area, Crime and Incivility: A Profile from the British Crime Survey.” In Hope, T. and Shaw, M. (eds.) Communities and Crime Reduction (London, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1988).Google Scholar
Lum, Cynthia, Kennedy, Leslie W. and Sherley, Alison J.. “The Effectiveness of Counter-Terrorism Strategies.” Campbell Systemic Reviews, Vol. 2, 2006, pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
Lynch, James P. “Routine Activity and Victimization at Work.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 3, Number 4, 1987, pp. 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matza, David. Delinquency and Drift (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964).
Mayhew, Patricia, Clarke, Ronald and Elliot, D.. “Motorcycle Theft, Helmet Legislation and Displacement.” Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 28, 1989, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxfield, Michael. “Household Composition, Routine Activities and Victimization: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1987, pp. 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miethe, TerranceandMeier, Robert. Crime and Its Social Context: Toward an Integrated Theory of Offenders, Victims, and Situations (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Painter, Kate and Farrington, David P.. “The Crime Reducing Effects of Improved Street Lighting: The Dudley Project.” In Clarke, Ronald V. (ed.) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (2nd edition) (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Rountree, Pamela and Land, Kenneth. “Burglary Victimization, Perceptions of Crime Risk and Routine Activities: A Multi-level Analysis across Seattle Neighborhoods and Census Tracts.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 33, 1996, pp. 137–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogan, Wesley.Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods (New York: Free Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Skogan, Wesley and Maxfield, Michael. Coping with Crime: Individual and Neighborhood Reactions (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1981).Google Scholar
Taylor, Ralph. “Crime, Grime and Responses to Crime: Relative Impacts of Neighborhood Structure, Crime, and Physical Deterioration on Residents and Business Personnel in the Twin Cities.” In Lab, Steven (ed.) Crime Prevention at the Cross-roads (Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing, Co., 1990).Google Scholar
Taylor, Ralph. “Crime, Grime, Fear and Decline: A Longitudinal Look.” NIJ Research in Brief (Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1999).Google Scholar
Tedeschi, J. and Felson, R.B.. Violence, Aggression and Coercive Action. (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseloni, Andromachi. “Personal Victimization in the United States: Fixed and Random Effects of Individual and Household Characteristics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 16, Number 4, 2000, pp. 415–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, Mark “Fear and Victimization: Why Are Women and the Elderly More Afraid?” Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 65, Number 2, 1984, pp. 681–702.Google Scholar
Warr, Mark and Stafford, Mark C.. “Fear of Victimization: A Look at the Proximate Causes,” Social Forces, Vol. 61, 1983, pp. 1033–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, B. “Steering Column Locks and Motor Vehicle Thefts: Evaluations from Three Countries.” In Clarke, Ronald V. (ed.) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (2nd edition) (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Weisburd, David, Wyckoff, Laura, Ready, Justin, Eck, John, Hinkle, Joshua, and Gajewski, Fran. “Does Crime Just Move Around the Corner? A Controlled Study of Spatial Displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits.” Criminology, Vol. 44, Number 3, 2006, pp. 549–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortley, Richard. Situational Prison Control: Crime Prevention in Correctional Institutions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortley, Richard. “Situational Crime Prevention and Prison Control: Lessons for Each Other.” Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 16, 2003, pp. 97–117.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×