Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- List of Figures and Maps
- List of Tables
- List of Boxes
- Foreword to the Second Edition
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Foreword to the First Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Notes
- Map
- PART I DEVELOPMENT OF THE MUHAMMADIYAH IN KOTAGEDE, c.1910s–1972
- PART II KOTAGEDE REVISITED, 1972–2010
- Bibliography
- Glossary
- Appendices
- Index
- About the Author
Foreword to the Second Edition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2015
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- List of Figures and Maps
- List of Tables
- List of Boxes
- Foreword to the Second Edition
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Foreword to the First Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Notes
- Map
- PART I DEVELOPMENT OF THE MUHAMMADIYAH IN KOTAGEDE, c.1910s–1972
- PART II KOTAGEDE REVISITED, 1972–2010
- Bibliography
- Glossary
- Appendices
- Index
- About the Author
Summary
The first edition of this book, published by Gadjah Mada University Press in 1983, was a significant landmark in the study of Indonesian — especially Javanese — society. This was originally a Ph.D. thesis in anthropology submitted to Cornell University, one that had been inspired to a considerable degree by Clifford Geertz's path-breaking work The Religion of Java. That was based on fieldwork done in 1953–54 and was published in 1960. Nakamura's fieldwork was done nearly two decades later and, whereas Geertz and his colleagues had worked in the East Javanese town of Pare (dubbed “Modjokuto” in their publications), Nakamura turned to the town of Kotagede, on the edge of the royal capitol of Yogyakarta. This was the site of the Mataram dynasty's earliest royal graves (from the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries) and an important base for the Islamic Modernist movement Muhammadiyah. It was, in other words, a very different place from Geertz's East Javanese site — an area only settled about a century before, without high royal traditions and far from the centre of Islamic reformism. Moreover, Geertz and his colleagues worked in the first post-Revolutionary years of newly independent Indonesia, whereas Nakamura was at work early in the New Order period of Soeharto. So a different view of the religious and cultural life of the Javanese emerged. Nakamura's work lacked the rhetorical flourishes and institutional fire-power of Geertz's, but it was at least as important as — some would say more important than — Geertz's as a study of social realities in much of Java. Nakamura's work was deeply researched, sympathetic and sensible, challenging many stereotypes and assumptions. But its publication by an Indonesian press with poor distribution networks meant that it was never as widely read or as influential as the work of Geertz, except in specialist circles.
Mitsuo Nakamura's return to this subject to produce an updated account is thus immensely welcome and should be widely read. We know that social, political, economic and religious realities have changed dramatically in Java since the times of Geertz and of Nakamura's own earlier research.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Crescent Arises over the Banyan TreeA Study of the Muhammadiyah Movement in a Central Javanese Town, c.1910s-2010 (Second Enlarged Edition), pp. xxi - xxivPublisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2012