Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Creation ex nihilo: early history
- 2 Creatio ex nihilo: its Jewish and Christian foundations
- 3 The act of creation with its theological consequences
- 4 Scotistic metaphysics and creation ex nihilo
- 5 Creation and the context of theology and science in Maimonides and Crescas
- 6 Creation: Avicenna's metaphysical account
- 7 Four conceptions of creatio ex nihilo and the compatibility questions
- 8 Will, necessity and creation as monistic theophany in the Islamic philosophical tradition
- 9 Trinity, motion and creation ex nihilo
- 10 The Big Bang, quantum cosmology and creatio ex nihilo
- 11 What is written into creation?
- 12 Creatio ex nihilo and dual causality
- 13 God and creatures acting: the idea of double agency
- 14 Thomas Aquinas on knowing and coming to know: the beatific vision and learning from contingency
- Index
- References
3 - The act of creation with its theological consequences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Creation ex nihilo: early history
- 2 Creatio ex nihilo: its Jewish and Christian foundations
- 3 The act of creation with its theological consequences
- 4 Scotistic metaphysics and creation ex nihilo
- 5 Creation and the context of theology and science in Maimonides and Crescas
- 6 Creation: Avicenna's metaphysical account
- 7 Four conceptions of creatio ex nihilo and the compatibility questions
- 8 Will, necessity and creation as monistic theophany in the Islamic philosophical tradition
- 9 Trinity, motion and creation ex nihilo
- 10 The Big Bang, quantum cosmology and creatio ex nihilo
- 11 What is written into creation?
- 12 Creatio ex nihilo and dual causality
- 13 God and creatures acting: the idea of double agency
- 14 Thomas Aquinas on knowing and coming to know: the beatific vision and learning from contingency
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
It is certainly remarkable that it took the fledgling Christian movement four centuries to respond to its central faith question concerning Jesus: who and what is he? Moreover, the long-standing quest for clarity regarding Jesus doubtless overshadowed more explicit reflection on the first article of the creed as well: ‘I believe in God, the Father almighty, creator of heaven and earth.’ As Robert Sokolowski observes: ‘The issue the church had to settle first, once it acquired public and official recognition under Constantine and could turn to controversies regarding its teaching, was the issue of the being and actions of Christ.’ Yet he goes on to insist:
[While] the Council of Chalcedon, and the councils and controversies that led up to it, were concerned with the mystery of Christ, … they also tell us about the God who became incarnate in Christ. They tell us first that God does not destroy the natural necessities of things he becomes involved with, even in the intimate union of the incarnation. What is according to nature, and what reason can disclose in nature, retains its integrity before the Christian God [who] is not a part of the world and is not a ‘kind’ of being at all. Therefore, the incarnation is not meaningless or impossible or destructive.
Moreover, what Sokolowski calls:
the Christian distinction between God and the world, the denial that God in his divinity is part of or dependent on the world, was brought forward with greater clarity through the discussion of the way the Word became flesh.[…]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Creation and the God of Abraham , pp. 40 - 52Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
- 3
- Cited by