Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:44:41.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - CSR and Sustainable Development Cross-Country Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2019

Edited by
Onyeka Osuji ,
Franklin N. Ngwu  and
Dima Jamali
Onyeka Osuji
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Franklin N. Ngwu
Affiliation:
Pan-Atlantic University, Nigeria
Dima Jamali
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing and Emerging Markets
Institutions, Actors and Sustainable Development
 , pp. 131 - 278
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K. and Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), 507–25.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R. V. and Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25, 417–46.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R. V. and Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28, 447–65.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A. and Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the s back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–63.Google Scholar
Alkhafaji, A. F. (1989). A stakeholder approach to corporate governance: Managing a dynamic environment, New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. E. (1982). Marketing strategic planning and the theory of the firm. Journal of Marketing, 46, 15–26.Google Scholar
Andon, P., Baxter, J. and Chua, W. F. (2015). Accounting for stakeholders and making accounting useful. Journal of Management Studies, 52 (7), 986–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. and Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175–90.Google Scholar
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Koth, S. and Jones, T. M. (1999). Does takeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488–506.Google Scholar
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibility of the Businessman, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bragdon, J. H. and Marlin, J. (1972). Is pollution profitable. Risk Management, 19(4), 9–18.Google Scholar
Brammer, S., Jackson, G. and Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28.Google Scholar
Brammer, S. and Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–43.Google Scholar
Brammer, S., Millington, A. and Pavelin, S. (2006). Is philanthropy strategic? An analysis of the management of charitable giving in large UK companies. Business Ethics: European Review (Chichester England), 15(3), 234–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H. and Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 499–518.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. and Slack, R. (2006). Public visibility as a determinant of the rate of corporate charitable donations. Business Ethics: European Review (Chichester England), 15(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1993). Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management, Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100/101, 1–7.Google Scholar
Chang, K., Kim, I. and Li, Y. (2014). The heterogeneous impact of corporate social responsibility activities that target different stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics. 125(2), 211–34.Google Scholar
Charkham, J. (1995). Keeping good company: a study of corporate governance in five countries. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, K. H. and Metcalf, R. W. (1980). The relationship between pollution control record and financial indicators revisited. The Accounting Review, 55(1), 168–77.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Djankov, S, Fan, J. P. H. and Lang, L. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6),2741–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, M., Starik, M., Cochran, P. and Jones, T. M. (1994). The Toronto conference: reflections on stakeholder theory. Business and Society, 33(1), 82.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Nord, W. R. (2006). The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd ed., London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Coffey, B. S. and Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1595–603.Google Scholar
Cornell, B. and Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16(1), 5–14.Google Scholar
Davis, K. and Blomstrom, R. L. (1975). Business and society: environment and responsibility, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Deng, S. and Dart, J. (1999). The market orientation of Chinese enterprises during a time of transition. European Journal of Marketing, 33(5/6), 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, 3–21.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (2000). The iron cage revisited: isomorphism in organizational fields. Advances in Strategic Management, 48(2), 147–60.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doshi, V. and Khokle, P. (2012). An institutional perspective on corporate social responsibility. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 37(2), 98–102.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. M. (1987). The corporate social policy process: beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility and corporate social responsiveness. California Management Review, 29(3), 99–114.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. M. (1989). Business ethics, corporate good citizenship, and the corporate social policy process: a view from the United States. Journal of Business Ethics. 8(8), 583–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrin, S. and Perotin, V. (1991). Does ownership always matter? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W. and McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–6.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. and Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, M. and Jaggi, B. (1982). Pollution disclosures, pollution performance and economic performance. Omega, 10(2), 167–76.Google Scholar
Friedland, R. and Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions, Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Frye, T. and Shleifer, A. (1997). The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. American Economic Review, 87(2), 354–8.Google Scholar
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B. and Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–45.Google Scholar
Grandori, A. (2004). Corporate governance and firm organization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, D. S., Bergesen, A. J. and Jones, A. W. (2002). Organizational size and pollution: the case of the US chemical industry. American Sociological Review, 67(3), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, S. B. and Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–46.Google Scholar
Greenley, G. E. and Foxall, G. R. (1997). Multiple stakeholder orientation in UK companies and the implications for company performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34(2), 259–84.Google Scholar
Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M. and Schmidpeter, R. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M., Millo, Y. and Barman, E. (2015). Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value. Journal of Management Studies, 52 (7), 907–34.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S. and St John, G. H. (1994). Strategic management of organizations and stakeholders. St Paul: West.Google Scholar
Harvey, B. and Schaefer, A. (2001). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: a study of UK water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(3), 243–60.Google Scholar
Hill, C. W. L. (1995). National institutional structures, transaction cost economizing and competitive advantage: the case of Japan. Organization Science, 6(1), 119–31.Google Scholar
Hong, Z. (2004). Mapping the evolution and transformation of the new private enterprises in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science. 9(1):23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, R. W. and Frazier, K. B. (1980). Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(2), 614–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). The theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–60.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–37.Google Scholar
Kaynak, E. and Kara, A. (2004). Market orientation and organizational performance: a comparison of industrial versus consumer companies in mainland China using market orientation scale (markor). Industrial Marketing Management, 33(8), 743–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: from ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 23–34.Google Scholar
Konar, S. and Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–89.Google Scholar
Kostova, T., Roth, K. and Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraatz, M. S., Block, E. S., Davis, J., Glynn, M. A., Hoffman, A. and Jones, C., et al. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. Journal of Pharmacy & Nutrition Sciences, 5(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. and Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. AMDISA Secretariat.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. and Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8),791–804.Google Scholar
Lin, L. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in China: window dressing or structural change? Berkeley Journal of International Law, 28(1), 64–100.Google Scholar
López-Iturriaga, F. J. and López-de-Foronda, Ó. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and large shareholders: an analysis of European firms. Transnational Corporations Review, 3(3), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. and Tan, J. J. (1998). A comparison of multinational and domestic firms in an emerging market: a strategic choice perspective. Journal of International Management, 4(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
Ma, D. and Parish, W. L. (2006). Tocquevillian moments: charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Social Forces. 85(2), 943–64.Google Scholar
Maguire, S., Hardy, C. and Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. T. and Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–80.Google Scholar
Mahoney, L. S. and Thorne, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and long-term compensation: evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(3), 241–53.Google Scholar
Maignan, I. and Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: the case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 283–97.Google Scholar
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A. and Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational stages and cultural phases: a critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 20–38.Google Scholar
Marquis, C. and Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A. and Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal. 31(4), 854–72.Google Scholar
Meek, W. R., Pacheco, D. F. and York, J. G. (2010). The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 493–509.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R. and Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Journal, 22(4), 853–86.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. V., Le, N. T. B. and Bryant, S. E. (2013). Sub-national institutions, firm strategies, and firm performance: a multilevel study of private manufacturing firms in Vietnam. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W. and Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: the nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.Google Scholar
Posner, B. C. and Schmidt, W. H. (1984). Values and the American manager: an update. California Management Review, 26(3), 202–16.Google Scholar
Ruf, B. M., Meade-Christie, N. L. and Brown, R. M. (2004). The relationship between the existence of antitakeover devices and corporate social performance. Academy of Accounting & Financial Studies Journal, 8(9), 2898–902.Google Scholar
Schaltegger, S. (2002). A framework for ecopreneurship: leading bioneers and environmental managers to ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 45–58.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995–1025.Google Scholar
Stanwick, P. A. and Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: an empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195–204.Google Scholar
Tan, J. (2002), Impact of ownership type on environment-strategy linkage and performance: evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 333–54.Google Scholar
Tang, Y. and Tang, Y. (2003). An exploratory study of market orientation in China. Asian Business & Management, 2(1), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. and Driver, C. (2002). Corporate governance and democracy: the stakeholder debate revisited. Journal of Management and Governance, 6(2), 111–30.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. K., Wartick, S. L. and Smith, H. L. (1991). Integrating corporate social performance and stakeholder management: implications for a research agenda in small business. In Post, J. E. ed., Research in corporate social performance and policy, 12(2), 207–30. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H. and Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958– 1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–43.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H. and Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, K. Sahlin, eds.,The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 99–128. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, A. C. B., Sin, L. Y. M., Yau, O. H. M., Lee, J. S. Y. and Chow, R. (2003). Market orientation and business performance in a Chinese business environment. Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 227–39.Google Scholar
Turban, D. B. and Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–72.Google Scholar
Wang, J. and Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–8.Google Scholar
Wang, H. and Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: the roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–81.Google Scholar
Webster, F. E. (1992). The changing role of marketing in the corporation. Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 1–17.Google Scholar
Webster, C. (1993). Refinement of the marketing culture scale and the relationship between marketing culture and profitability of a service firm. Journal of Business Research, 26(2), 111–31.Google Scholar
Wherther, W. B. and Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–38.Google Scholar
Wicks, A. C., Berman, S. L. and Jones, T. M. (1999). The structure of optimal trust: moral and strategic implication. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 99–116.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Yan, A. and Gray, B. (1994). Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: a comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1478–517.Google Scholar
Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z. and Zhu, J. (2010). Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Amao, O. O. (2007). Reflexive law: Does it have any relevance to the corporate social responsibility (CSR) debate? Cork Online Law Review, 6, 55–64.Google Scholar
Allirajani, M. (2017). ‘India Inc’s CSR spending rises 22% in FY16’, Times of India, 30 January 2017, available at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/India-business/India-incs-csr-spending-rises-22-in-fy 16/aticleshow/56869682.cms accessed on 29 June 2018Google Scholar
Berkowitz, D., Pistor, K. and Richard, J. F. (2003). Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect. European Economic Review, 47(1), 165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, R. G., Mukherjee, A. and Duppati, G. (2017). Mandatory corporate social responsibility: The India experience. 8th Conference on Financial Markets and Corporate Governance (FMCG) 2017.Google Scholar
Boodoo, M. U. (2016). Does mandatory CSR reporting regulation lead to improved corporate social performance? Evidence from India.Google Scholar
Buhmann, K. (2010). Reflexive regulation of CSR to promote sustainability: Understanding EU public-private regulation on CSR through the case of human rights. University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2010-07. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1712801.Google Scholar
Chahoud, T., Emmerling, J., Kolb, D., Kubina, I., Repinski, G. and Schläger, C. (2007). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in India-assessing the UN global compact’s role Vol. 26 Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik GmbH, p. 127.Google Scholar
Chhaparia, P. and Jha, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in India: The legal evolution of CSR policy. Amity Global Business Review, 13(1).Google Scholar
Deep, A. (2017). Vedic theory of debts and CSR, legal regulations and CSR initiative by Maharatna Company – Gail (India) Ltd. International Journal of Current Research, 9(07), 54263–24268.Google Scholar
Dhanesh, G. S. (2015). Why corporate social responsibility? An analysis of drivers of CSR in India. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 114–29.Google Scholar
Dharmapala, D. and Khanna, V. (2018). The impact of mandated corporate social responsibility: Evidence from India’s Companies Act of 2013. International Review of law and Economics, 56, 92–104.Google Scholar
Galliara, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in India. In Williams, G., ed., Responsible management in Asia: Perspectives on CSR. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
Garoupa, N. and Ogus, A. (2006). A strategic interpretation of legal transplants. The Journal of Legal Studies, 35(2), 339–63.Google Scholar
Gatti, L., Vishwanath, B., Seele, P. and Cottier, B. (2018). Are we moving beyond voluntary CSR? Exploring theoretical and managerial implications of mandatory CSR resulting from the New Indian Companies Act. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–12.Google Scholar
Gautam, R. and Singh, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: A study of top 500 companies. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 2(1), 41–56.Google Scholar
Gopalan, S. and Kamalnath, A. (2015). Mandatory corporate social responsibility as a vehicle for reducing inequality: An Indian solution for Piketty and the millennials. Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy, 10, 34.Google Scholar
Gouda, S., Khan, A. G. and Hiremath, S. L. (2017). Corporate social responsibility in India. Trends, issues and strategies. Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Husted, B. W. (2015). Corporate social responsibility practice from 1800–1914: Past initiatives and current debates. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(1), 125–41.Google Scholar
Karhu, J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and the law: Ideas for developing dynamic elements in mandatory CSR. Review of Market Integration, 7(1), 62–74.Google Scholar
Legrand, P. (1997). The impossibility of ‘legal transplants’. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative law, 4(2), 111–24.Google Scholar
Mohan, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship: Perspectives from India. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1 Jun(2), 107–17.Google Scholar
Mousourakis, G. (2013). Legal transplants and legal development: A jurisprudential and comparative law approach. Acta Juridica Hungarica, 54(3), 219–36.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A. and Bird, R. (2016). Analysis of mandatory CSR expenditure in India: a survey. International Journal of Corporate Governance, 7(1), 32–59.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A. and Chaturvedi, R. (2013). From CSR to MCSR: The journey towards mandatory corporate social responsibility in India. Golden Research Thoughts 3(2), 2231-5063.Google Scholar
Osuji, O. K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, juridification and globalisation: ‘Inventive interventionism’ for a ‘paradox’. International Journal of Law in Context, 11(3), 265–98.Google Scholar
Parvin, K. K. (2018). Corporate social responsibility: Dimensions and challenges in selected software companies in India. International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 9(2).Google Scholar
Pillai, K. R. (2017). Corporate social responsibility in India: A journey from corporate philanthropy to governance mandate. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(2),176–84.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. and Rishi, P. (2016). Logical framework analysis of corporate social responsibility initiatives of Indian paper industry. Journal of Organisation & Human Behaviour, 5(4).Google Scholar
Rishi, P. and Moghe, S. (2013). Integrating corporate social responsibility and culture as a strategy for holistic corporate success in India. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (51), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in India: The emerging discourse & concerns. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations,582–96.Google Scholar
Singh, A. and Verma, P. (2014). From philanthropy to mandatory CSR: A journey towards mandatory corporate social responsibility in India. International Journal of Business and Management Invention 3(8).Google Scholar
Sinha, S. N. (2017). A critical analysis of the provisions of corporate social responsibility. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 16(3).Google Scholar
Singh, A. and Verma, P. (2014). CSR@ 2%: A new model of corporate social responsibility in India. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 4(10).Google Scholar
Sundar, P. (2000). Beyond business: From merchant charity to corporate citizenship: Indian business philanthropy through the ages. Indian Centre for Philanthropy: Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sundar, P. (2013). Business and community: The story of corporate social responsibility in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1983). Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law. Law and Society Review 17(2), 239–85.Google Scholar
Trautmann, T. R. (1979). Traditions of statecraft in ancient India. In Moore, R. J. ed., Tradition and politics in South Asia. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House, pp. 86–102.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (1978). Comparative law and legal change. The Cambridge Law Journal, 37(2), 313–36.Google Scholar

References

Adedeji, J. A., Fadamiro, J. A. and Adeoye, A. O. (2014). Spatial implications of street trading in Osogbo traditional city centre, Nigeria. Architecture Research, 4(1A), 34–44. https://doi:10.5923/s.arch.201401.05.Google Scholar
Auriol, E. and Warlters, M. (2005). Taxation base in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89(4), 625–46.Google Scholar
Baena, V. (2018). The importance of CSR practices carried out by sport teams and its influence on brand love: The Real Madrid Foundation. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11–2016–0205.Google Scholar
Barrett, R. (1998). Liberating the Corporate Soul: Building a Visionary Organization, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. and Adhikari, T. (2006). Development and conservation: Indigenous business and the UNDP Equator Initiative. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 3, 671–90.Google Scholar
Branco, M. C. and Rodriques, L. L. (2007). Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate of corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(1).Google Scholar
Bromley, R. (2000). Street vending and public policy: A global review. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20(1/2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330010789052.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. and Wilson, T. D. (2017). Introduction: The urban informal economy revisited. Latin American Perspectives, 45(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X17736043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busso, M., Fazio, M. and Levy, S. (2012). (In)formal and (un)productive: The productivity costs of excessive informality in Mexico. IDB Working Paper Series 1DB-WP-341.Google Scholar
Cantele, S. and Zardini, A. (2018). Is sustainability a competitive advantage for small businesses? An empirical analysis of possible mediators in the sustainability-financing performance relationship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 166–76.Google Scholar
Castka, P., Bamber, C. J., Bamber, D. J. and Sharp, J. M. (2004). Integrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) into ISO management systems: In search of a feasible CSR management system framework. The TQM Magazine, 16(3), 216–24.Google Scholar
Cheru, F. (2002). African Renaissance: Roadmaps to the Challenge of Globalization, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Coelho, P. R., McClure, J. E. and Spry, J. A. (2003). The social responsibility of corporate management: A classical critique. American Journal of Business, 18(1), 15–24.Google Scholar
Crowther, D. (2004). Corporate social reporting: Genuine action or window dressing? In Crowther, D. and Rayman-Bacchus, L., eds., Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Efiong, J. E., Usang, O. U., Inyang, I. O. and Effiong, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in small and medium scale enterprises in Nigeria: An example from the hotel industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(14), 119–26.Google Scholar
Fan, J., Haq, S. H. I. U., Moeriera, A. G. and Virk, M. M. (2018). Impact of CSR dimensions on consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty in the formation of purchase intentions: Study from Pakistan livestock industry. Management, 8(2), 54–63.Google Scholar
Fortis, Z., Maon, F., Frooman, J. and Reiner, G. (2018). Unknown knowns and known unknowns: Framing the role of organizational learning in corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 277–300.Google Scholar
Gazzola, P. (2014). CSR integration into the corporate strategy. Cross-Cultural Management Journal, XVI (2[6]), 331–8.Google Scholar
Gërxhani, K. (2004). The informal sector in developed and less developed countries: A literature survey. Public Choice, 120(3/4), 267–300. https://doi:196.13.242.252.Google Scholar
Gibson, K., Hill, A. and Law, L. (2018). Community economies in Southeast Asia: A hidden economic geography. Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Development, 131–41.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. and Li, W. (2009). Tax structures in developing countries: Many puzzles and a possible explanation. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7–8), 855–66.Google Scholar
Guadamillas-Gómez, F., Donate-Manzanares, M. J. and Škerlavaj, M. (2010). The integration of corporate social responsibility into the strategy of technology-intensive firms: A case study. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci, 28(1), 9–34.Google Scholar
Hailong, L. (2010). The schools of thought about corporate social responsibility [J]. China Nonprofit Review, 2, 007.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. G. and Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256971.Google Scholar
Helg, A. (2007). ‘Corporate social responsibility from a Nigerian perspective’. Master’s thesis, Management and Organisation, Handelshogskolan, 2007.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M. I. M. and Wertheimer, A. I. (2018). Introduction: Discovering issues and challenges in low- and- middle-income countries. In Ibrahim, M. I. M., Wertheimer, A. I., Babar, Z.-U.-D., eds., Social and Administrative Aspects of Pharmacy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Present Challenges and Future Solutions, pp. 1–11. London, San Diego, Cambridge and Oxford: Academic Press, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Inclusive Cities and WIEGO (2010). The informal economy monitoring study. www.wiego.org/wiego/informal-economy-monitoring-study-iems-publicationsGoogle Scholar
International Conference of Labour Statisticians [ICLS] (2003). Guidelines concerning a statistical definition of informal employment. 17th ICLS. Available at www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/–dgreports/–stat/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_087622.pdf accessed 28 March 2018.Google Scholar
International Institute for Environment and Development [IIED] (2016). Informality and inclusive green growth: Evidence from ‘The biggest private sector’ event. London: IIED.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization [ILO] (2013). Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical picture. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Ismail, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and its role in community development: An international perspective. Journal of International Social Research, 2(9).Google Scholar
Jackson, T. (2016). Indigenous practices in the informal economy and sustainability in Africa: Cultural Heritage as a Generator of Sustainable Development, in The role of Entrepreneurship: Challenges and Opportunities – Workshop, 2 November 2016, Middlesex University.Google Scholar
Larson, J. E. (2002). Informality, illegality, and inequality. Yale Law & Policy Review, 20(1), 137–82.Google Scholar
Mang’unyi, M. S. and Chege, K. (2014). Challenges facing the implementation of corporate social responsibility programs in education sector: A survey of private primary schools in Busia County, Kenya. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 3(4), 410–25.Google Scholar
Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews (63 paragraphs). Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3), Art. 8, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387 accessed 28 September 2016.Google Scholar
Mbaye, M. A. (2014). The informal sector, employment, and structural transformation: Some operational recommendations for a productive policy, The Informal Sector, Growth, Employment, and Sustainable Development: Discussion Note, pp. 1–7. International Organization of La Francophonie.Google Scholar
Miranda, A. T. and Miranda, J. L. F. (2018). Status and conditions of small-and medium-sized enterprises as predictors in empowering rural communities in Samar Island, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 105–19.Google Scholar
Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 296–306.Google Scholar
Obalola, M. A. (2010). ‘Ethics and social responsibility in the Nigerian insurance industry: A multi-methods approach’. Doctoral degree thesis, De Montfort University, 2010.Google Scholar
Onokala, U. and Banwo, A. (2015). Informal sector in Nigeria through the lens of apprenticeship, education and unemployment. American Advanced Research in Management, 1(1), 13–22.Google Scholar
Onwe, O. J. (2013). Role of the informal sector in development of the Nigerian economy: Output and employment approach. Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 1(1), 60–74.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2017). Enhancing the contributions of SMEs in a global and digitalised economy. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level Paris, 7–8 June 2017. Available at www.oecd.org/mcm/documents/C-MIN-2017–8-EN.pdf accessed 7 June 2018.Google Scholar
Peredo, A. M. and McLean, M. (2010). Indigenous development and the cultural captivity of entrepreneurship. Business & Society, 52(4), 592–620.Google Scholar
Pirsch, J., Gupta, S. and Landreth, G. (2007) A framework for understanding Corporate Social Responsibility programs as a continuum: An explanatory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 125–40.Google Scholar
Quazi, A. and O’Brien, D. (2000). An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 33–51.Google Scholar
Rahman, S. (2011). Evaluation of definitions: Ten dimensions of corporate social responsibility. World Review of Business Research, 1(1), 166–76.Google Scholar
Russo, A. and Tencati, A. (2008). Formal vs. informal CSR strategies: Evidence from Italian micro, small, medium-sized, and large firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 339–53. 10.1007/s10551-008-9736-x.Google Scholar
Spence, L. J. and Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics: Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
Steel, W. F. and Snodgrass, D. (2008). Raising productivity and reducing risks of household enterprises: Diagnostic methodology framework. World Bank Africa Region Analysis on the Informal Economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Sweeney, L. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in Ireland: Barriers and opportunities experienced by SMEs when undertaking CSR. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(4), 516–23.Google Scholar
Truong, V. D. (2018). Tourism, poverty alleviation, and the informal economy: The street vendors of Hanoi, Vietnam. Tourism Recreation Research, 43(1), 52–67.Google Scholar
Uzo, U. and Adigwe, J. O. (2016). Cultural norms and cultural agents in buyer-seller negotiation processes and outcomes. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 36(2), 126–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2016.1188707.Google Scholar
Uzo, U. and Mair, J. (2014). Source and patterns of organizational defiance of formal institutions: Insights from Nollywood, the Nigerian movie industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8, 56–74. http://doi:10.1002/sej.1171.Google Scholar
Vanek, J., Chen, M. A., Carré, F., Heintz, J. and Hussmanns, R. (2014). Statistics on the informal economy: Definitions, regional estimates and challenges. WIEGO Working Paper (Statistics) 2, available at www.wiego.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/Vanek-Statistics-WIEGO-WP2.pdf accessed 28 March 2018.Google Scholar
Visser, W. (2012). Practising social responsibility without the CSR label. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/smes-social-responsibility-without-csr-label accessed 7 June 2018.Google Scholar

References

Aberdein, D. (1994). Marine Salvage and the Environment: New Zealand and the 1989 Salvage Convention, Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal, 10(1), 35–74.Google Scholar
Binney, B. (1990). Protecting the Environment with Salvage Laws: Risks, Rewards, and the 1989 Salvage Convention, Washington Law Review, 639–56.Google Scholar
Birks, P. (1985). Introduction to the Law of Restitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. (2012). The Development of Environmental Salvage and Review of the London Salvage Convention. Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 37, 65–106.Google Scholar
Burrows, A. (2011). The Law of Restitution, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, L. (2001). Recent Developments in the Law of Salvage of the Marine Environment, International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 16(4), 686–98.Google Scholar
Coulthard, P. (1983). A New Cure for Salvors? A Comparative Analysis of the LOF 1980 and the C.M.I Draft Salvage Convention, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 14(1), 45–67.Google Scholar
De La Rue, C. and Anderson, C. (1998). Shipping and the Environment, London: Informa.Google Scholar
De La Rue, C. and Anderson, C. (2009). Shipping and the Environment, 2nd ed. London:Informa.Google Scholar
De La Rue, C. and Anderson, C. (2012). Environmental Salvage – Plus ça change …? The Journal of International Maritime Law, 18,279–92.Google Scholar
Gaskell, N. (1986) The Lloyd’s Open Form and Contractual Remedies Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 306–49.Google Scholar
Goff, R. and Jones, G. (1966). The Law of Restitution, London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Gold, E. (1989). Marine Salvage: Towards a new regime, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 20,487–503.Google Scholar
Kerr, D. (1989). The 1989 Salvage Convention: Expediency or Equity, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 20(4), 505–20.Google Scholar
Kerr, M. (1990). The International Convention on Salvage 1989 – How It Came to Be, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 39, 530–56.Google Scholar
Klippert, G. (1983). Unjust Enrichment, Toronto: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Merkin, R. (2000). Privity of Contract: The Impact of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, A. (1981). Lloyd’s Standard Form of Salvage Agreement – LOF 80: A Commentary Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 12(2), 243–61.Google Scholar
Redgwell, C. (1990). The Greening of Salvage Law, Marine Policy, 142–50.Google Scholar
Reeder, J. (2003). Brice on Maritime Salvage, 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Reeder, J. (2011). Brice on Maritime Law of Salvage, 5th ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Rose, FD. (1989). Restitution for the Rescuer Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 9, 167–204.Google Scholar
Rose, F. D. (2010). Kennedy & Rose Law of Salvage, 7th ed. London: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Stoljar, S. (1964). The Law of Quasi-Contract, Law Book Company for New South Wales Bar Association.Google Scholar
Sutherland, P. (2006). Third-Party Contracts. In Macqueen, H. and Zimmermann, R. D., eds., European Contract law – Scots and South African Perspectives’, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 203–29.Google Scholar
Sutherland, P. and Cupido, D. M. (2004). Insurance Law. Annual Survey of South African Law, 540–65.Google Scholar
Van der Linde, M., ed., (2010). Compendium of South African Environmental Legislation 2nd ed. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press.Google Scholar
Van Rensburg, A, Lotz, J. G. and Van Rhijn, T. A. R. (2014) Contract. In D. Joubert, ed., The Law of South Africa 3rd ed. Vol 9.Google Scholar
Virgo, G. (1999). Principles of the Law of Restitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Abrahms, M. (2008). What terrorists really want: Terrorist motives and counterterrorism strategy. International Security, 32(4), 78–105.Google Scholar
Amaeshi, K., Adegbite, E. and Rajwani, T. (2016).Corporate social responsibility in challenging and non-enabling institutional contexts: Do institutional voids matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), 135–153.Google Scholar
Baden, L., Kanapathipillia, R., Campion, E. W., Morrisey, S., Rubin, E. J. and Drazen, J. M. (2014). Ebola – an ongoing crisis. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(15), 1458–1469.Google Scholar
BBC (2016). Thailand profile – timeline. BBC News.Google Scholar
Bethell, O. (2017) Responsible Sourcing of Seafood at Nestlé – Thailand Action Plan Update. Nestrade LTD, 1–2.Google Scholar
Blackstone, B. (2017). Nestlé Drops Targets as Consumer Giants Struggle. The Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
Boddewyn, J. and Doh, J. (2011). Global strategy and the collaboration of MNEs, NGOs, and governments for the provisioning of collective goods in emerging markets. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3‐4), 345–361.Google Scholar
Bulke, P. (2014). Keynote Statement, United Nations Annual Forum on Business and Human Rights. Nestlé.Google Scholar
Carter, Z. (2015). Obama Shrugs Off Global Slavery to Protect Trade Deal. The Huffington Post.Google Scholar
Churie, A., Sjostedt, G. and Corell, E. (2005). Global Challenges: Furthering the Multilateral Process for Sustainable Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
CIA (2017). Thailand, The World Fact Book. US Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2008). CIA Above the Law? Secret Detentions and Unlawful Inter-state Transfers of Detainees in Europe. Strasbourg, France, p. 152.Google Scholar
Cynamon, B. Z., Fazzari, S. M. and Setterfield, M. (2013). After the Great Recession: The Struggle for Economic Recovery and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A. (2011). Reforms, multinationalization, and profitability. In Toombs, L., ed., Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A. (2012). Pro-market reforms and developing country multinational corporations. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3), 262–276.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A. (2013). Learning across geographic space: Pro-market reforms, multinationalization strategy, and profitability. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(3), 235–262.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A. (2016). Knowledge will set you free: Enhancing the firm’s responsiveness to institutional change. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(2), 121–147.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A. (2018). Contextualizing international learning: The moderating effects of mode of entry and subsidiary networks on the relationship between reforms and profitability. Journal of World Business, 53(1), 403–414.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A., Moore, E. M. and Abrahms, M. (2018). Female Entrepreneurship and International Organizations. In Apostolopoulos et al., eds., Entrepreneurship and the Sustainable Development Goals. Bradford: Emerald Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A., Moore, E. M. and Bradley, C. (2019). Regime Structure, Institutional Stability and Pro-Market Reforms: Deepening the Inter-disciplinary Connection. In Newburry, W., ed., Family and Entrepreneurial Multinational Companies in Latin America: Contexts, Challenges and Perspectives. London: Palgrave Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A., Moore, E. M. and Soto, M. (2016a). Informal Transnational Political Actors and Emerging Markets: Understanding Entrepreneurship in a Changing Normative Atmosphere. In Walsh, A., ed., Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance, pp. 19–41. NOVA Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A., Moore, E. M. and Soto, M. (2016b). The Great Recession and Emerging Market Firms: Unpacking the Divide Between Global and National Level Sustainability Expectations. In Lessons from the Great Recession: At the Crossroads of Sustainability and Recovery, pp. 165–187. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Dau, L. A., Moore, E. M., Figgins, J. and Ault, J. (2017). Firms as Policy Advocates and Institutional Framers: Understanding the Impact of Ethnic and Political Stratification on BRICS MNEs. In Nelson, W. D., ed., Advances in Business and Management. New York: NOVA Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Datla, A. (2013). United States and Thailand: Diplomatic Wrangles in the War on Human Trafficking, Case Number 1991.0, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, p. 9.Google Scholar
District Court California. (2015). Barber v. Nestlé USA Inc. December 9.Google Scholar
Doh, J., Rodrigues, S., Saka-Helmhout, A. and Makhija, M. (2017). International business responses to institutional voids. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 293–307.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st-Century Business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. (2013). Enter the Triple Bottom Line. In The Triple Bottom Line.New York: Routledge, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
Environmental Justice Foundation (2015). “Pirates and Slaves: How Overfishing in Thailand Fuels Human Trafficking and the Plundering of Our Oceans”. The Environmental Justice Foundation, London, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
Global Slavery Index (2016). Thailand Country Report.Google Scholar
Hacking, T. and Guthrie, P. (2008). A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(2–3), 73–89.Google Scholar
IMF. (2010). “Mexico Recovering, but Crisis Spotlights Challenges, says IMF”. IMF Survey Magazine: In the News, March, pp. 12–38.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. (2016). Nestlé admits slavery in Thailand while fighting child labour lawsuit in Ivory Coast, The Guardian.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S. and Nisbett, R. (2015). The Ebola epidemic: a transformative moment for global health. Bulletin of the World Health, 93(1), 2–12.Google Scholar
Kessler, G. (2015). Why you should be wary of statistics on “modern slavery” and “trafficking”. The Washington Post.Google Scholar
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. G. (2005). Spotting Institutional Voids in Emerging Markets. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. G. (2010). Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. T. and Beamish, P. W., eds. (2012). Globally responsible leadership: Managing according to the UN global compact. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
Leipziger, D. and Canuto, O. (2012). “Ascent after Decline: Regrowing Global Economies after the Great Recession”. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, p. 322.Google Scholar
Lucas, S. (2017). One Country at a Time: International Human Rights Reform in Asia. Liberty Law, p. 27.Google Scholar
Mahtaney, P. (2013). Globalization and Sustainable Economic Development: Issues, Insights, and Inference. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mair, J. and Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435.Google Scholar
Mair, J., Martí, I. and Ventresca, M. J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819–850.Google Scholar
Mason, M. (2014). Thailand’s rampant trafficking may carry price, The Associated Press.Google Scholar
Mason, M. (2015). Myanmar fisherman goes home after 22 years as a slave. The Associated Press.Google Scholar
Mason, M. McDowell, R. Mendoza, M. and Htusan E. (2015). Global supermarkets selling shrimp peeled by slaves. The Associated Press.Google Scholar
Mazzella, D. (2017). Slaves No More, West Virginia University Magazine.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (2016). The child labour lawsuit against Nestlé: what you need to know, Global Citizen.Google Scholar
Millar, C. C., Choi, C. J. and Chen, S. (2004). Global strategic partnerships between MNEs and NGOs: Drivers of change and ethical issues. Business and Society Review, 109(4), 395–414.Google Scholar
Nayyar, D. (2011). The financial crisis, the great recession and the developing world. Global Policy, 2(1), 20–32.Google Scholar
Nestlé. (2011). Nestlé worldwide CEO visits Thailand. Nestlé Press Release.Google Scholar
Nestlé. (2013). The Nestlé Supplier Code.Google Scholar
Nestlé. (2013). Nestlé Responsible Sourcing Guideline.Google Scholar
Nestlé. (2015). Nestlé takes action to tackle seafood supply chain abuses. Nestlé.Google Scholar
Nestlé. (2015) Responsible Sourcing of Seafood – Thailand Action plan 2015–2016. Nestec S.A., 1–6.Google Scholar
Nestlé. (2018). About Us, Detailed History.Google Scholar
Nguyen, K. (2015). Nestlé Admits to Slave Labour, May Prompt Other Companies to Come Clean, The Huffington Post.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osland, J. S. (2013). An overview of the global leadership literature. In Global leadership, New York: Routledge, pp. 48–77.Google Scholar
Park, S. (2005). Norm diffusion with international organizations: A case study of the World Bank. Journal of International Relations and Development, 8(2), 111–141.Google Scholar
Puffer, S. M. and McCarthy, D. J. (2008). Ethical turnarounds and transformational leadership: A global imperative for corporate social responsibility. Thunderbird International Business Review, 50(5), 303–314.Google Scholar
Puffer, S. M., McCarthy, D. J. and Boisot, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 441–467.Google Scholar
Savitz, A. (2013). The Triple Bottom Line: How Today’s Best-Run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environmental Success – and How You Can too. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Seafood Task Force. (2016) Story so far. Seafood Task Force.Google Scholar
Singh, K. (2012). “Does globalization spell the end of the nation-state?” In Introduction to Global Politics: A Reader, pp. 327–333.Google Scholar
Smith, S. E. (2015). 5 shocking scandals that prove it’s time to boycott Nestlé, The Daily Dot.Google Scholar
Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M. and Stride, C. (2015). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 308–331.Google Scholar
Stride, J. (2016) Assessing government and business responses to the Thai seafood crisis. The Freedom Fund & Humanity United, 1–44.Google Scholar
Syrmopoulos, J. (2016). Nestlé Just Admitted to Using Slaves – Here’s a List of Their Brands to Stop Buying Right Now. The Free Thought Project.Google Scholar
Verité. (2015). Verité Assessment of Recruitment Practices and Migrant Labour Conditions in Nestlé’s Thai Shrimp Supply Chain. Verité.Google Scholar
Verité. (2015). About Verité.Google Scholar
US Department of Labour. (2015). Thailand Country Report.Google Scholar
US Federal Bureau of Investigations. (2016). Report from Thailand.Google Scholar
US State Department. (2012). Trafficking in Persons Report.Google Scholar
Wyatt, D. K. (2003). Thailand: A Short History. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 2.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, C., et al. (2014). Health and human trafficking in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Findings from a survey of men women and children in Cambodia, Thailand and Viet Nam. International Organization for Migration and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. p. 4.Google Scholar

References

Ancona, D. G., Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321–341.Google Scholar
Arat, Y. (2010). Religion, politics and gender equality in Turkey: Implications of a democratic paradox Third World Quarterly, 31, 869–884.Google Scholar
Aycan, Z. (2004). Key success factors for women in management in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 453–477.Google Scholar
Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G. and Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 192–221.Google Scholar
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.Google Scholar
Bantel, K. A., Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107–12.Google Scholar
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F. and Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart’s content: a model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802–836.Google Scholar
Barton, D. (2011). Capitalism for the long term. Harvard Business Review 89, 84–91.Google Scholar
Bear, S., Rahman, N., and Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation, Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.Google Scholar
Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615.Google Scholar
Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L. and Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37, 709–743.Google Scholar
Borsa Istanbul (2018). BIST Sustainability Index. available at www.borsaistanbul.com/en/indices/bist-stock-indices/bist-sustainability-index, accessed April 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185–97.Google Scholar
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 946–967.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. and Minguez-Vera, A. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management & Governance, 14, 37–59.Google Scholar
Cannella, A. A., Park, J. and Lee, H. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member co-location and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 197–237.Google Scholar
Capital Market Boards of Turkey (Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu) (2011). Kurumsal yönetim ilkelerinin belirlenmesine ve uygulanmasina ilişkin tebliğ.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275–284.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A. and Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 533–545.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A. and Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.Google Scholar
Chen, H. (2014). Board capital, CEO power and R&D investment in electronics firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(5), 422–436.Google Scholar
Chuang, T., Nakatani, K. and Zhou, D. (2009) An exploratory study of the extent of information technology adoption in SMEs: An application of upper echelon theory. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22, 183–196.Google Scholar
Cook, A. and Glass, C. (2017). Women on corporate boards: Do they advance corporate social responsibility? Human Relations, 71(7), 897–924.Google Scholar
Crane, A. and Matten, D. (2007). Business ethics. Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Datta, D. K., Gutherie, J. P. and Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 135-145.Google Scholar
DeBakker, F., Groenewegen, P. and DenHond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society, 44(3), 283–317.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (1984). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 26(2), 53–63.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Gender differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Carli, L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L. and Bourgeois, L. J. (1997). Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Review, 39(2), 42–62.Google Scholar
Erkut, S., Kramer, V. W. and Konrad, A. M. (2008). Critical mass: Does the number of women on a corporate board make a difference? In Vinnicombe, S., Singh, V., Burke, R., Bilimoria, D. and Huse, M, eds., Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Research and Practice, London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Escriba-Esteve, A., Sanchez-Peinado, L. and Sanchez-Peinado, E. (2009). The influence of top management teams in the strategic orientation and performance of small and medium-sized enterprises. British Journal of Management, 20, 581–97.Google Scholar
European Professional Women’s Network (2008). 3rd European PWN Board Women Monitor.Google Scholar
European Union [EU] (2016). Corporate social responsibility for All Project Turkey, Sustainability Reporting National Review Report.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis/St. Paul: West.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C. and Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., Whitehead, J. and Campbell, A. (2009). What drives leaders to make bad decisions? Leader to leader, 53, 52–58.Google Scholar
Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate governance. Corporate Reputation Review, 8, 267–271.Google Scholar
Forbes, D. and Milliken, F. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision‐making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489‐505.Google Scholar
Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(1), 17–38.Google Scholar
Gamerschlag, R., Moller, K. and Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2–3), 233–262.Google Scholar
García-Meca, E., García-Sánchez, I. M. and Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2015). Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: An international analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 53, 202–214.Google Scholar
García-Retamero, R. and López-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55 (1–2), 51–61.Google Scholar
Glass, C., Cook, A. and Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25, 495–511.Google Scholar
Glick, P. and Fiske, S. T. (2007). Sex discrimination: The psychological approach. In Crosby, F. J., Stockdale, M. S. and Ropp, S. A., eds., Sex discrimination in the workplace. Malden: Blackwell 155–187.Google Scholar
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T. et al., (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and Benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 , 763–775.Google Scholar
Glick, P., Sakalli-Uğurlu, N., Akbas, G., Orta, I.M. and Ceylan, S. (2016). Why do women endorse honor beliefs? Ambivalent sexism and religiosity as predictors. Sex Roles, 75, 543–554.Google Scholar
Glick, P., Wilk, K. and Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565–582.Google Scholar
Golden, B. R. and Zajac, E. J. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination power strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1087–1111.Google Scholar
Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M. and Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Account, 28(3–4), 327–356.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. (1989). Guest editor’s introduction: Putting top managers back in the strategy picture. Strategic Management Review, 10, 5–15.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. and Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
Haynes, K. and Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163.Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E. (1997). Gender discrimination and the affirmative action remedy: The role of gender stereotypes. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 877–889.Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E. and Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92.Google Scholar
Hermann, P. and Datta, D. K. (2005). Relationships between top management team Characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69–78.Google Scholar
Holme, R. and Watts, P. (2000). Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense. Geneva: The World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Horwitz, S. K. and Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: a meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987–1015.Google Scholar
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M. and Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 249–267.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W. and Gupta, V. eds., (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The globe study of 62 societies. California: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
International Finance Corporation (2011). Focus: Women on Boards; A Conversation with Male Directors. A Global Corporate Governance Forum Publication.Google Scholar
International Labor Office [ILO] (1999). Worst Forms of Child Labor Convention. No. 182.Google Scholar
International Labor Office (1958). Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention. No. 111.Google Scholar
International Labor Office (1951). Equal Remuneration Convention. No. 100.Google Scholar
International Labor Office (1949). Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention. No. 98.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A. and Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on group and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801–830.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. and Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(4), 741–763.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990.Google Scholar
Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. and İmamoğlu, E. O. (2002). Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 333–351.Google Scholar
Khan, Z., Lew, Y. K. and Park, B. (2015). Institutional legitimacy and norms-based CSR marketing practices: Insights from MNCs operating in a developing economy. International Marketing Review, 32(5), 463–491.Google Scholar
Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G. and Sinha, J. (2005). Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 63–74.Google Scholar
Kidder, D. L. and Parks McLean, J. (2001). The good soldier: Who is she? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 228, 939–959.Google Scholar
Kirsch, A. (2018). The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 346–364.Google Scholar
Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K. and Thomas, D. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42, 3–21.Google Scholar
Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V. and Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.Google Scholar
Kolk, A. (2005). Environmental reporting by multinationals from the Triad: Convergence or divergence. Management International Review, 45(1), 145–167.Google Scholar
Kumra, S. and Vinnicombe, S. (2008). A study of the promotion to partner process in a professional services firm: How women are disadvantaged. British Journal of Management, 19, S65–S74.Google Scholar
Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1–22.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M. and Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585–634.Google Scholar
Lin, C. (2008). Clarifying the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors, gender, and knowledge sharing in workplace organizations in Taiwan. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 241–250.Google Scholar
Lindgreen, A., Maon, F., Reast, J. and Yani-De-Soriano, M. (2012). Guest editorial: Corporate social responsibility in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 393–395.Google Scholar
McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
Michel, J. G. and Hambrick, D. C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 9–37.Google Scholar
Milliken, F. J. and Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 402–433.Google Scholar
Mun, E. and Jung, J. (2018). Change above the glass ceiling: Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity in Japanese firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(2), 409–440.Google Scholar
Murray, A. I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Leaders and Leadership, 10(1), 125–141.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. and Faff, R. (2012). Impact of board size and board diversity on firm value: Australian evidence. Corporate Ownership and Control, 4, 24–32.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 301–316.Google Scholar
Official Gazette (T.C. Resmi Gazete), 11/02/2011, No:28201.Google Scholar
Official Gazette (T.C. Resmi Gazete), 30/12/2011, No:28158.Google Scholar
Öngen, D. E. (2007). The relationships between sensation seeking and gender role orientations among Turkish university students. Sex Roles, 57, 111–118.Google Scholar
Özdemir, F. (2016). Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik üzerinde dini yönelim tiplerinin yordayici gücü (The predictive power of religious orientation type on ambivalent sexism), Nesne, 4, 89–107.Google Scholar
Özkan, T. and Lajunen, T. (2005). Masculinity, femininity, and the Bem sex role inventory in Turkey. Sex Roles, 52, 103–110. PDP (2018). Public Disclosure Platform. Available at www.kap.org.tr/en/, accessed April 11, 2018,Google Scholar
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organizational Science, 7, 615–631.Google Scholar
Pelled, L., Eisenhardt, K. and Xin, K. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1–28.Google Scholar
Pitcher, P. and Smith, A. D. (2001). Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organization Science, 12, 1–18.Google Scholar
Post, C., Rahman, N. and McQuillen, C. (2015). From board composition to corporate environmental performance through sustainability-themed alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 423–435.Google Scholar
Richardson, G., Taylor, G. G. and Lanis, R. (2016). Women on the board of directors and corporate tax aggressiveness in Australia: An empirical analysis. Accounting Research Journal, 29(3), 313–331.Google Scholar
Rindova, V. (1999). What corporate boards have to do with strategy: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 953–75.Google Scholar
Roberto, M. A. (2003). The stable core and dynamic periphery in top management teams. Management Decision, 41, 120–131.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A. and Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A. and Kilianski, S. E. (2000), Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315–1328.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E. and Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179.Google Scholar
Rudman, A. and Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations, Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79.Google Scholar
Sabanci University. (2017). Women on Board Turkey, 5th Annual Report, Corporate Governance Forum of Turkey.Google Scholar
Sakalli, N. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44, 599–610.Google Scholar
Sakalli-Uğurlu, N. (2002), Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması (Ambivalent sexism inventory: a study of reliability and validity). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi (Turkish Journal of Psychology), 17, 47–58.Google Scholar
Sakalli-Uğurlu, N. and Beydoğan, B. (2002). Turkish college students’ attitudes toward women managers: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and gender differences. Journal of Psychology, 136(6), 647–656.Google Scholar
Sambharya, R. B. (1996). Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversification strategies of U.S. multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 739–46.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism-collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S.-C. and Yoon, G., eds., Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications, pp. 85–119. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sexton, D. L. and Bowman-Upton, N. (1990). Female and male entrepreneurs: Psychological characteristics and their role in gender related discrimination. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 29–36.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. and Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.Google Scholar
Simons, T., Pelled, L. and Smith, K. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662–673.Google Scholar
Sümer, H. C. (2006). Women in management: Still waiting to be full members of the club. Sex Roles, 55, 63–72.Google Scholar
Stulmacher, A. F. and Poitras, J. (2010), Gender and job role congruence: A field study of trust in labor mediators. Sex Roles, 63, 489–499.Google Scholar
TCMA [Turkish Capital Markets Association] (2014). The handbook of the Turkish Capital Markets. Istanbul: TCMA Publication.Google Scholar
TISK (2016). Corporate social responsibility for All Project Turkey, sustainability reporting, National Review Report. available at http://tisk.org.tr/en/wp-content/uploads/192016/04/CSR.pdf accessed February 25, 2018.Google Scholar
TurkStat (2017). Laborforce statistics. Available from www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24630 accessed August 25, 2017.Google Scholar
UNDP/EU Commission (2008). Turkey Corporate Social Responsibility Baseline Report. available from http://kssd.org/site/dl/uploads/CSR_Report_en.pdf accessed April 28, 2018.Google Scholar
Ward, S. J. and King, L. A. (2018). Gender differences in emotion explain women’s lower immoral intentions and harsher moral condemnation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 653–669.Google Scholar
Welbourne, T. M., Cycyota, C. S. and Ferrante, C. J. (2007). Wall street reaction to women IPOs: An examination of gender diversity in top management teams. Group & Organization Management, 32, 524–547.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 7–24.Google Scholar
Wiersema, M. F. and Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.Google Scholar
Williams, K. Y. and O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.Google Scholar
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E. and Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1–33.Google Scholar
World Commission on Economic Development [WCED] (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum (2016). The global gender gap report. Available at http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report- 192016/ accessed April 25, 2018.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum (2016). Gender parity and human capital. Global gender gap Report. Available from http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report- 192016/rankings/ accessed April 25, 2018.Google Scholar
Yang, Q., Xue, Y. and Yurtoglu, B. B. (2007). Does the Strategic Role and the Control Role of the Board of Directors Exist in Chinese Listed Companies? (Project No. 07JC630057) and (Project No. 2008BJB018), Shanghai, China: Social Science of Educational Minister project and Shanghai Social Science.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×