Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:38:32.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2009

Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Conflict of Interest and Public Life
Cross-National Perspectives
, pp. 237 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Advisory Committee on Business Appointments. 2004a. Sixth Report 2002–2004. Www.acoba.gov.uk/publications.aspx. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Advisory Committee on Business Appointments. 2004b. Seventh Report 2004–2005. Www.acoba.gov.uk/publications.aspx. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Aitken, Jonathan. 2000. Pride and Perjury. London: HarperCollinsGoogle Scholar
Anechiarico, Frank, and Jacobs, James B.. 1996. The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Michael. 1995. “The Integrity Agenda.” In How Ottawa Spends 1995–1996: Mid-life Crisis, ed. Phillips, Susan D., 237–262. Ottawa: Carleton University PressGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Michael, and Mancuso, Maureen. 1992. “Edicts and Etiquette: Regulating Conflict of Interest in Congress and the House of Commons.” Corruption and Reform 7, no. 1: 1–18Google Scholar
Audit Commission. 1993. Protecting the Public Purse: Ensuring Probity in Local Government. London: HMSO
Audit Commission. 1998. Fraud and Corruption Survey 1997–1998. London: HMSO
Baggott, Rob, and Harrison, L.. 1986. “The Politics of Self-Regulation: The Case of Advertising Control.” Policy and Politics 14, no. 2: 143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Amy. 2000. Prime Ministers and the Rule Book. London: PoliticosGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1967. “The Public Interest.” In Political Philosophy, ed. Quinton, A.. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Beloff, Michael. 2003. “Judicial Review in England and Wales: The State of the Art.” Jersey Law Review 7, no. 1 (February)Google Scholar
Bennett, Colin. 1991a. “How States Use Foreign Evidence.” Journal of Public Policy 11, no. 1 (January–March)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Colin. 1991b. “Review Article: What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?British Journal of Political Science 21, no. 2 (April): 215–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergh, Albert Ellery, ed. 1903. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Washington, D.C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial AssociationGoogle Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1999. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, D.C.: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
Bierbauer, Charles. 1999. “Study: Eight Federal Judges Had Conflict of Interest.” CNN.com, September 13. Accessed on August 13, 2007Google Scholar
Bipartisan Commission on the Political Reform Act of 1974. Final Report and Recommendations.Http://www.fppc.ca.gov/pdf/McPherson.pdf. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Birnbaum, Jeffrey. 2005. “Letters Show Frist Notified of Stocks in ‘Blind’ Trust.” Washington Post, October 24, p. A1Google Scholar
Black, Gordon S. 1970. “A Theory of Professionalization in Politics.” American Political Science Review 64, no. 3: 865–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, G. 2005. “On the Compatibility of the Frattini Law with the Council of Europe Standards in the Field of Freedom of Expression and Pluralism of the Media.” Council of Europe, Opinion no. 51, Strasburg, August 31
Brady, Brian. 2004. “Anger as Blair Moves to Relax Anti-Sleaze Laws.” Scotland on Sunday, August 1Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1982. “Enforced Self-regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control.” Michigan Law Review 80: 1466–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brien, Andrew. 1998–1999. A Code of Conduct for Parliamentarians? Parliament of Australia, Department of the Parliament Library. Research Paper 2
Broder, John M. 2005. “In Storm's Ruin, a Rush to Rebuild and Reopen for Business.” New York Times, September 10, p. A1Google Scholar
Brown, George. 2000. “Putting Watergate Behind Us – Salinas, Sun-Diamond, and Two Views of the Anticorruption Model.” Tulane Law Review 74: 747–814Google Scholar
Brown, Marjorie. 1971. “Executive Privilege: A Brief Summary.” Congressional Research Service, July 23, p. 2Google Scholar
Cabinet Office. 2003. “Government Response to the Public Administration Select Committee's Fourth Report of Session 2002–03: ‘Government by Appointment: Opening up the Patronage State,’” HC 165. London
Caiden, Gerald E., Dwivedi, O. P., and Jabbra, J., eds. 2001. Where Corruption Lives. Bloomfield, Conn.: Kumarian PressGoogle Scholar
Cain, Dylian M., Loewenstein, George, and Moor, Don A.. 2005. “The Dirt on Coming Clean: Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest.” Journal of Legal Studies 34 (January): 125Google Scholar
Calise, M. 2000. Il partito personale. Rome-Bari: LaterzaGoogle Scholar
Capano, G., and Giuliani, M., eds. 2001. Parlamento e processo legislativo in Italia. Continuità e mutamento. Bologna: Il MulinoGoogle Scholar
Carney, Gerald. 1998. Conflict of Interest: Legislators, Ministers and Public Officials. Study prepared for Transparency International
Carius, Manuel. 2001. Cumuls et pantouflages dans les trois fonctions publiques. Paris: Berger-Levrault, Google Scholar
Castronovo, V., ed. 1976. L'Italia contemporanea, 1945–1975. Turin: EinaidiGoogle Scholar
Chafetz, Josh. 2006. Democracy's Privileged Few: Legislative Privilege and Democratic Norms in the British and American Constitutions. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Chiavacci, Leonardi Anna Maria. 1991. Dante Alighieri, Commedia, I, Inferno. Mondadori MilanoGoogle Scholar
Civil Service Management Code.Www.civilservice.gov.uk/publications/code/index.asp. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Clark, Heather. 2002. “The Supreme Court's Indecent Proposal: Repealing the Honoraria Prohibition of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978.” Cornell Law Review 87: 1475–1508Google Scholar
Clark, Joe. 2003. “No Peekaboo Clause for Ministers.” National Post, February 20, p. A19Google Scholar
Clark, Kathleen. 1996. “Do We Have Enough Ethics in Government Yet?: An Answer from Fiduciary Theory.” University of Illinois Law Review 1: 57–102Google Scholar
Clark, Kathleen. 2001. “Regulating the Conflict of Interest of Government Officials.” In Conflict of Interest in the Professions, ed. Davis, Michael and Stark, Andrew. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Coates, Sam. 2007. “Blair Exacts His Revenge on Sleaze Watchdog.” The Times, March 14Google Scholar
Code of Conduct for Commissioners. 2004. SEC (2004) 1487/2. Http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/code_of_conduct/code_conduct_en.pdf. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Code of Conduct for Special Advisers. Www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/propriety_and_ethics/special_advisers/code.asp. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Code of Conduct Together with the Guide to the Rules Relating to the Conduct of Members. 2002. HC 841 2001–02. London: House of Commons
Collins, Robert S. 1994. “Ethics and the First Amendment: The Applicability of the Honorarium Ban of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 to the Executive Branch.” George Washington Law Review 62: 888–919Google Scholar
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 1995. Standards in Public Life. First Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 1996. Local Public Spending Bodies. Second Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 1997a. Standards of Local Government in England, Scotland and Wales. Third Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 1997b. Review of Standards of Conduct in Executive NDPBs, NHS Trusts and Local Public Spending Bodies. Fourth Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 1998. The Funding of Political Parties in the United Kingdom. Fifth Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2000a. Reinforcing Standards: Review of the First Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life. Sixth Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2000b. Standards of Conduct in the House of Lords. Seventh Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2001. The First Seven Reports: A Review of Progress. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2002. Standards of Conduct in the House of Commons. Eighth Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2003. Defining the Boundaries within the Executive. Ninth Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2005. Getting the Balance Right: Implementing Standards in Public Life. Tenth Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life. 2007. Review of the Electoral Commission. Eleventh Report. London
Committee on Standards in Public Life/British Market Research Bureau. 2004. Survey of Public Attitudes Towards Conduct in Public Life. London: The Stationery Office
Connolly, William E. 1989. The Terms of Political Discourse. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Corte costituzionale italiana (Italian Constitutional Court). 1961. Decision n. 42 of 1961. Www.giurcost.org/decisioni/index.html. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Cotta, M., and Isernia, P., eds. 1996. Il gigante dai piedi di argilla. Bologna: Il MulinoGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Jeanne. 2001. “Bush Seeks to Buttress Defense of the Executive Branch.” Wall Street Journal, September 6, p. A24Google Scholar
Davis, Michael, and Stark, Andrew. 2001. Conflict of Interest in the Professions. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Dawson, R. MacGregor. 1970. The Government of Canada, 5th ed. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Morlino, Leonardo, eds. 2005. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Dionne, E. J. 1991. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Simon & SchusterGoogle Scholar
Dobel, J. Patrick. 1993. “The Realpolitik of Ethics Codes: An Implementation Approach to Public Ethics.” In Ethics and Public Administration, ed. Frederickson, G. H., 158–176. New York: M. E. SharpeGoogle Scholar
Doig, Alan. 2002. “Sleaze Fatigue in the House of Ill-Repute.” Parliamentary Affairs 55, no. 2: 389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doig, Alan, and Skelcher, Chris. 2001. “Ethics in Local Government: Evaluating Self-Regulation in England and Wales.” Local Government Studies 27, no.1: 87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doig, Alan, MacIvor, Stephanie, and Moran, Jon. 1999. “A Word Desperately Seeking Scandal? New Labour and Tony's Cronies.” Parliamentary Affairs 52, no. 4: 677–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolowitz, David P., and Marsh, D.. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13, no. 1: 5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doss, Marion, and Roberts, Robert. 1997. From Watergate to Whitewater: The Public Integrity War. London: PraegerGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1967. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, Sergio. 1998. Quale democrazia. L'Italia e gli altri. 3rd ed. Rome-Bari: LaterzaGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, Sergio. 2000a. “Political Change without Institutional Transformation. What Can We Learn from the Italian Crisis of the 1990s?International Political Science Review 21, no. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, Sergio. 2000b. Tra pressioni e veti. Il cambiamento politico in Italia. Rome-Bari: LaterzaGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, Sergio. 2006. “The Italian Case of a Transition within Democracy.” Journal of South Europe and the Balkans 8, no. 2Google Scholar
Fabbrini, Sergio, and Gilbert, M.. 2000. “When Cartels Fail: The Role of the Political Class in the Italian Democratic Transition.” Government and Opposition 35, No. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1975. “If, as Ralph Nader Says, Congress Is ‘The Broken Branch,’ How Come We Love Our Congressmen So Much?” In Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform, ed. Ornstein, Norman J.. New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar
Fife, Robert, and Dawson, Anne. 2002. “M.P.s' Spouses Won't Have to Declare Assets, PM Bows to Backbenchers.” National Post, October 9, p. A12Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2001. “Congressional Checks on the Judiciary.” In Congress Confronts the Court, ed. Campbell, Colton and Stack, John. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Jenny, and Holland, Ian, eds. 2001. Motivating Ministers to Morality. Sydney: Ashgate PublishingGoogle Scholar
Foley, Michael. 1999. The Politics of the British Constitution. Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1999. The Horizontal Society. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Gallie, W. B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garment, Suzanne. 1992. Scandal: The Culture of Mistrust in American Politics. New York: Anchor BooksGoogle Scholar
Gay, Oonagh. 2002. The Regulation of Parliamentary Standards – A Comparative Perspective. Research paper prepared for the Commission on Standards in Public Life. London
Gay, Oonagh. 2003.”Parliamentary Standards: A Developing Issue.” Political Quarterly 74, no. 1: 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Oonagh, and Leopold, Patricia. 2004. Conduct Unbecoming: The Regulation of Parliamentary Behaviour. London: PoliticosGoogle Scholar
Geyd, Charles. 2006. When Courts and Congress Collide: The Struggle for Control of America's Judicial System. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F. 2002. “Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis.” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 6: 873–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin, and Shefter, Martin. 1990. Politics by Other Means: The Declining Importance of Elections in America. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, P. 2005a. The Politics of Everyday Life: Making Choices, Changing Life. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, P. 2005b. Silvio Berlusconi: Television, Power and Patrimony. London: VersoGoogle Scholar
Giraudi, G. ed. 2005. Crisi della politica e riforme costituzionali. Soveria Mannelli, Catanzaro: RubbettinoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Amy. 2006. “Vanguard Ruling Defended; ‘Oversights,’ but No Conflict, Alito Says.” Washington Post, January 11, p. A12Google Scholar
Goodman, Marshall R., Timothy J. Holp, Louis Martin, and Eric Rademacher. 1994. “Legislative Ethics: Reform and Reaction in the States.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, New York
Graber, Doris A., ed. 2000. Media Power in Politics, 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: C. Q. PressGoogle Scholar
Graham, Alastair. 2005. Keynote Speech. Fourth Assembly of Standards Committees, September 5
Green, Jeffrey. 2003. “History of Conflicts Law.” Hamline Law Review 26: 556–600Google Scholar
Greene, Ian. 1990. “Conflict of Interest and the Canadian Constitution: An Analysis of Conflict of Interest Rules for Canadian Cabinet Ministers.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 23: 233–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Ian. 1991. “Government Ethics Commissioners: The Way of the Future?Canadian Public Administration 34, no. 1: 165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Ian, and Shugarman, David. 1997. Honest Politics: Seeking Integrity in Canadian Public Life. Toronto: James Lorimer.Google Scholar
Grossi, Pierfrancesco. 1970. Giuramento (dir. Cost). In Enciclopedia del diritto. Milano: Giuffré, ⅪXGoogle Scholar
Gundle, S., and Parker, S., eds. 1996. The New Italian Republic: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis F. Thompson. 1990. “Moral Conflict and Political Consensus.” In Liberalism and the Good, ed. Douglass, R. Bruce et al. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter, ed. 1992. “Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination.” Special Issue of International Organization 46, no. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter. 1997. Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination. Columbia: University of South Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State.” Comparative Politics 25, no. 3: 275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1961. The Federalist Papers. New York: PenguinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Luke, Leigh, David, and Pallister, David. 1997. The Liar: The Fall of Jonathan Aitken. London: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Hazell, Robert. 1999. Constitutional Futures: A History of the Next Ten Years. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hennessy, Peter. 1996. The Hidden Wiring: Unearthing the British Constitution, 2nd ed. London: IndigoGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, David. 2003. “Silvio Berlusconi, the Media, and the Conflict of Interest Issue.” Italian Politics: A Review 17: 291–309Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher, et al. 1999. Regulation Inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police, and Sleaze Busters. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosken, Andrew. 2006. Nothing like a Dame: The Scandals of Shirley Porter. London: GrantaGoogle Scholar
House of Commons. 1978. Parliamentary Debates. Fifth Series, vol. 954, July 28
House of Commons. 1980. Parliamentary Debates. Fifth Series, vol. 989, July 21
Ibbitson, John. 2004. “Liberals Take No Prisoners.” Globe and Mail, May 5, p. A4Google Scholar
Ignazi, P. 2002. Il potere dei partiti. La politica in Italia dagli anni sessanta ad oggi. Rome-Bari: LaterzaGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, John. 1990. “The International Spread of Privatization Politics: Inducement, Learning and Policy Bandwagoning.” In The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization, ed. Suleiman, Ezra and Waterbury, J.. Boulder, Colo.: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Ingram, Helen, and Anne Schneider. 1993. “Constructing Citizenship: The Subtle Messages of Policy Design.” In Public Policy for Democracy, ed. Ingram, Helen and Smith, S. Rathgeb, 68–98. Washington, D.C.: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, John C. Jr., Karlan, Pamela S., Low, Peter W., and Rutherglen, George A.. 2000. Civil Rights Actions: Enforcing the Constitution. New York: Foundation PressGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Bruce, and Callahan, Daniel, eds. 1985. Representation and Responsibility: Exploring Legislative Ethics. New York: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
Josephson, Michael. 1989. “Ethics Legislation: Problems and Potential.” State Legislatures 15, no. 6 (July)Google Scholar
Karlan, Pamela S. 1994. “Not by Money but by Virtue Won?: Vote Trafficking and the Voting Rights System.” Virginia Law Review 80: 1455–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Robert. 2005a. “Ofgov: A Commissioner for Government Conduct?Parliamentary Affairs 58, no. 1: 171–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Robert. 2005b. “Reluctant Innovators: Regulating Conflict of Interest within Washington and Westminster.” In Regulatory Innovation, ed. Black, J., Lodge, M., and Thatcher, M.. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Robert. 2007. “In Defence of Politicking.” In Ethics and Integrity of Governance: Perspectives across Frontiers, ed. Maesschalck, J., Huberts, L., and Jurkiewicz, Carole. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1934. Reine Rechtslehre, trans. Stanley L. Paulson and Bonnie Litschewski Paulson. In Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1960. Pure Theory of Law, trans. Max Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967Google Scholar
Kerns, P., and Sampson, G.. 2003. “Do Ethics Laws Work?State Legislatures, July/AugustGoogle Scholar
King, Anthony. 1981. “The Rise of the Career Politician in Britain – And Its Consequences.” British Journal of Political Science 11: 249–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Kingsley, Jean-Pierre. 1989. “Conflict of Interest as a Part of Political Ethics: The Canadian Federal Government Experience.” Ottawa: Assistant Deputy Registrar General, July 13
Lanaro, S. 1992. Storia dell'Italia repubblicana. Venice: MarsilioGoogle Scholar
Langford, John W., and Tupper, Allan. 1994. Corruption, Character and Conduct: Essays on Canadian Government Ethics. Toronto: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Law Commission. 1998. Legislating the Criminal Code: Corruption. Http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/lc248(1).pdf. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Lee, Jennifer. 2004. “Report Faults Agency More Than Top Aide in Lobbying Case.” New York Times, March 17, p. A14Google Scholar
Leigh, David, and Vulliamy, Ed. 1997. Sleaze: The Corruption of Parliament. London: Fourth EstateGoogle Scholar
Leopold, Patricia. 2004. “The Regulation of Standards of Conduct in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.” In Conduct Unbecoming: The Regulation of Parliamentary Behaviour, ed. Gay, Oonagh and Leopold, Patricia. London: PoliticosGoogle Scholar
Ley, Jane S. 2003. “Managing Conflict of Interest in the Executive Branch: The Experience of the United States.” In Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service, 232–234. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
Library of Parliament (Canada). N.d. “Background Brief: Comparison of Recommendations of Special Joint Committee.” Bills C-116 and C-43
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M., and C. Scott. 1997. “The Regulatory State.” In Devlopments in British Politics, vol. 5, ed. Dunleavy, P. J., Gamble, A., Holliday, I., and Peele, G.. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Low, Sidney. 1904. The Governance of England. London: T. Fisher UnwinGoogle Scholar
MacIntosh, Andrew. 2002a. “‘A Referendum on Corruption,’ Alliance Says.” National Post, May 13Google Scholar
MacIntosh, Andrew. 2002b. “RCMP Demands Inn's Records from ‘A to Z.’National Post, August 29, p. A4Google Scholar
MacIntosh, Andrew. 2003. “Watchdog Took Gagliano's Word on Ad Contracts.” National Post, June 10, p. A2Google Scholar
Mackenzie, G. Calvin, with Hafken, Michael. 2002. Scandal Proof: Do Ethics Laws Make Government Ethical? Washington, D.C.: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
Macleod, Colin M. 2005. “Ethical Political Conduct and Fidelity to the Democratic Ethos.” International Public Management Journal 8, no. 2: 263–274Google Scholar
Majone, G. 1997. “From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance.” Journal of Public Policy 17, no. 2: 139–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, P., ed. 2003. La posta in gioco. Temi, personaggi e satira nella campagna elettorale 2001. Rome: CarocciGoogle Scholar
Mancuso, Maureen. 1995. The Ethical World of MPs. Montreal and London: McGill-Queen's University PressGoogle Scholar
Mancuso, Maureen, Atkinson, Michael M., André Blais, , Greene, Ian, and Nevitte, N., eds. 1998. A Question of Ethics: Canadians Speak Out. Toronto: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Manning, Bayless. 1964. “The Purity Potlatch: An Essay on Conflicts of Interest, American Government, and Moral Escalation.” Federal Bar Journal 24: 239–256Google Scholar
Maskell, Jack. 2003. “Revolving Door, Post-Employment Laws for Federal Personnel.” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, 97ဓ875Google Scholar
McBride, Ann. 1990. “Ethics in Congress: Agenda and Action.” George Washington Law Review 58: 451–487Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1986. Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives on Public Interest Liberalism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
McFarland, Andrew S. 1984. Common Cause: Lobbying in the Public Interest. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.Google Scholar
McGregor, Glen. 2003. “PM Defends Indonesian Meetings.” Montreal Gazette, February 19, p. A10Google Scholar
McKeown, Deirdre. 2003. “Codes of Conduct in Australian and Some Overseas Parliaments.” E-brief, Parliament of Australia. December 1. Http://www.aph.gov.au/library/intguide/POL/CodeConduct.htm. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Mettler, Suzanne. 2002. “Bringing the State Back into Civic Engagement: Policy Feedback Effects of the G. I. Bill for World War II Veterans.” American Political Science Review 96, no. 2: 351–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministerial Code. Www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/propriety_and_ethics/publications. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Moran, Michael. 2001. “The Rise of the Regulatory State in Britain.” Parliamentary Affairs 54, no. 1: 19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Michael. 2003. The British Regulatory State. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
MORI Social Research Institute. 2003. Exploring Trust in Public Institutions. Report for the Audit Commission. London: Mori (May)
Morlino, L. 1998. Democracy Between Consolidation and Crisis: Parties, Groups and Citizens in Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
M.P.'s Pay.” 1983. Daily Telegraph, August 16, p. 18
Nardini, Lisa Malloy. 1996. “Dishonoring the Honorarium Ban: Exemption for Federal Scientists.” American University Law Review 45, no. 3: 885–928Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 2002. The State of Legislative Ethics: A Look at the Ethical Climate and Ethics Laws for State Legislators. Denver, Colo.: NCSL
Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Decline of Deference. Peterborough: Broadview PressGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, Colin, Daniel, T., Polaine, M., and Hatchard, J.. 2006. Corruption and Misuse of Public Office. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Beth. 1990. “Regulating Government Ethics: When It's Not Enough to Just Say No.” George Washington Law Review 58: 405–416Google Scholar
Nolan, Beth. 1992. “Public Interest, Private Income: Conflicts and Control Limits on the Outside Income of Government Officials.” Northwestern University Law Review 87: 57–147Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1998. “Political Elites and Constitutional Change.” Scottish Affairs 25: 93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph N., Zelikow, Philip, and King, David C.. 1997. Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Dawn. 2003. Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. 2002. “Annual Report, 2001–02.” London: The Stationery Office
Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. 2003. “First Annual Report, 2002–03.” London: The Stationery Office
Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. 2004. “Second Annual Report, 2003–04.” London: The Stationery Office
Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. 2005. “Third Annual Report, 2004–05.” London: The Stationery Office
Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. 2006. “Fourth Annual Report, 2005–06.” London: The Stationery Office
Passigli, S. 2002. Democrazia e conflitto d'interessi. Il caso italiano. Florence: Ponte alle GrazieGoogle Scholar
Peele, Gillian. 2004. Governing the United Kingdom, 4th ed. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45: 595–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 2: 251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podger, Andrew, and Reid, Mary. 2003. “A Principle-Based Approach in Devolved Management: The Australian Experience.” In Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service, 101–124. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
Poli, E. 2001. Forza Italia: Strutture, leadership e radicamento territoriale. Bologna: Il MulinoGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62, no. 1: 144–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, William. 1992. “State Legislative Careers: Twenty-five Years of Reform.” In Changing Patterns in State Legislative Careers, ed. Moncrief, Gary F. and Thompson, J. A.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Prad-Bordenave, Emanuelle. 2003. “Regulation Through Updated Regulations and Sanctions: The French Experience.” In Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service, 153–155. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
Preston, Noel. 2001. “Codifying Ethical Conduct for Australian Parliamentarians, 1990–1999.” Australian Journal of Political Science 36, no. 1: 45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Administration Committee. 2001a. Mapping the Quango State 2000/2001: HC 367 (March)
Public Administration Committee. 2001b. Special Advisers: Boon or Bane? 2000/2001: HC 293 (March)
Public Administration Committee. 2002. “The Unfortunate Events: Lessons of Recent Events at the Former DTLR.” 2001/2002: HC 303 (July)
Public Administration Committee. 2003. Government by Appointment: Opening Up the Patronage State. 2002/2003: HC 165-i (July)
Public Administration Committee. 2006. The Ministerial Code: The Case for Independent Investigation. 2005/2006: HC 1457 (September)
Public Administration Committee. 2007. Ethics and Standards: The Regulation of Conduct in Public Life. 2006/2007: HC 121
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & SchusterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radaelli, Claudio. 2000. “Policy Transfer in the European Union.” Governance 13, no. 1: 25–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, Robert. 1983. “Legislators as Private Attorneys: The Need for Legislative Reform.” UCLA Law Review 30: 1052–1077Google Scholar
Ridley, F. F., and Doig, Alan. 1995. Sleaze: Politicians, Private Interests and Public Reaction. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Robert N., and Doss, Marion T. Jr. 1992. “Public Service and Private Hospitality: A Case Study in Federal Conflict-of-Interest Reform.” Public Administration Review 52, no. 3: 260–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohr, John A. (1978) 1989. Ethics for Bureaucrats: An Essay on Law and Values. New York: Marcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard. 1993. Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy. Chatham: Chatham HouseGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenson, Beth A. 2000. “Legislative Ethics Regulation in the American States: Explaining Conflict of Interest Legislation, 1954–1996.” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Rosenson, Beth A. 2003. “Against Their Apparent Self-Interest: The Authorization of Independent State Legislative Ethics Commissions, 1973–96.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly (Spring) 3, no. 1: 42–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1996. Drawing the Line: Legislative Ethics in the States. New York: Twentieth Century FundGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Guido. 2003. Il conflitto epidemico. Milano: AdelphiGoogle Scholar
Sabato, Larry. 1991. Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism Has Transformed American Politics. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Howard. 1971. “Ethical Standards in the State Legislature.” In Strengthening the States: Essays on Legislative Reform, ed. Herzberg, Donald G. and Rosenthal, A.. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
Saint-Martin, Denis. 2003. “Should the Federal Ethics Counsellor Become an Independent Officer of Parliament?Canadian Public Policy 39, no. 2: 197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Martin, Denis. 2004. Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvati, M. 2000. Occasioni mancate: Economia e politica in Italia dagli anni '60 ad oggi. Rome-Bari: LaterzaGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. 2004. Mala tempora. Rome-Bari: LaterzaGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Ann L., and Ingram, Helen. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of KansasGoogle Scholar
Scoppola, P. 1990. La repubblica dei partiti. Bologna: Il MulinoGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William H. 1996. “Historical Events as Transformations of Structures.” Theory and Society 25, no. 6: 641–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Charlene Wear, Roland, Helen, and Kelly-DeWitt, Jennifer. 1998. Local Government Ethics Ordinances in California. Sacramento: California Research Bureau, California State LibraryGoogle Scholar
Skelcher, Chris, and Snape, Stephanie. 2001. “Ethics and Local Councillors: Modernising Standards of Conduct.” Parliamentary Affairs 54: 72–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Special Joint Committee of the Senate and House of Commons. 1992a. Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence: Conflicts of Interest, February 11
Special Joint Committee of the Senate and House of Commons. 1992b. Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence: Conflicts of Interest, March 17
Special Joint Committee of the Senate and House of Commons. 1992c. Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence: Conflicts of Interest, March 24
Special Joint Committee of the Senate and House of Commons. 1992d. Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence: Conflicts of Interest, April 9
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “The Theory of Legislative Institutionalization and the California Assembly.” Journal of Politics 54, no. 4: 1026–1054CrossRef
Standards Board for England. 2004. Lobby Groups, Dual-Hatted Members and the Code of Conduct. London: Standards Board for England
Stark, Andrew. 1992a. “English-Canadian Opposition to Quebec Nationalism.” In The Collapse of Canada?, ed. Weaver, R. Kent. Washington, D.C.: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
Stark, Andrew. 1992b. “Public Sector Conflict of Interest at the Federal Level in Canada and the U.S.: Difference in Understanding and Approach.” Public Administration Review 52: 427–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Andrew. 1997. “Beyond Quid Pro Quo: What Is Wrong with Private Gain from Public Office?American Political Science Review 91, no. 1: 108–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Andrew. 2000. Conflict of Interest in American Public Life. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Stark, Andrew. 2005. “Canada's Upside-Down World of Public Sector Ethics.” International Public Management Journal 8, no. 2: 187–208Google Scholar
Stephens, Joe. 2004. “U.S. Judges Getting Disclosure Data Deleted.” Washington Post, August 5, p. A4Google Scholar
Stern, Robert M. 1985. “Ethics in the State: The Laboratories of Reform.” In Representation and Responsibility: Exploring Legislative Ethics, ed. Jennings, Bruce and Callaghan, Daniel, 243–262. New York: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Kathleen M. 1992. “The Justices of Rules and Standards.” Harvard Law Review 106: 22–123Google Scholar
Sunstein. Cass, R. 1988. “Beyond the Republican Revival.” Yale Law Journal 97: 1539–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, Mark. 2002. “Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation.” West European Politics 25, no. 1: 125–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 1992. “Paradoxes of Government Ethics.” Public Administration Review 52, no. 3: 254–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 1995. Ethics in Congress: From Individual to Institutional Corruption. Washington, D.C.: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 2004. Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John B. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Tolchin, Martin, and Susan, J. Tolchin. 2001. Glass Houses: Congressional Ethics and the Politics of Venom. Boulder, Colo.: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
Tower, John. 1991. Consequences: A Personal and Political Memoir. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
Treasury Solicitor. 2006. The Judge over Your Shoulder, 4th ed. (January) Http://www.planning-inspectorate.gov.uk/pins/agency_info/judge_over_your_shoulder.pdf. Accessed on August 13, 2007
Tuccari, F., ed. 2002. Il governo Berlusconi. Le parole, i fatti, i rischi. Rome-Bari: LaterzaGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, Robert G. 1990. “Ethics in Government and the Vision of Public Service.” George Washington Law Review 58: 417–450Google Scholar
Walker, Jack. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63: 880–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, J. Jackson. 1981. “The Ethics in Government Act, Conflict of Interest Laws and Presidential Recruiting.” Public Administration Review 41, no. 6: 659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1919 (1946). “Politics as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. and ed. H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 77–128. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wellens, K. C., and Borchardt, G. M.. 1989. “Soft Law in European Community Law.” European Law Review 14: 267–321Google Scholar
Wigley, Simon. 2003. “Parliamentary Immunity: Protecting Democracy or Protecting Corruption?Journal of Political Philosophy 11, no. 2: 23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Robert. 2002. “Conduct Unbecoming: The Regulation of Legislative Ethics in Britain and the United States.” Parliamentary Affairs 55: 611–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Sandra. 1985. Conflict of Interest: The Ethical Dilemma in Politics. London: GowerGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Howard. 2002. “The Constantly Rising Ethics Bar.” Presentation to the Canadian Centre for Ethics and Corporate Policy, Toronto, November 7
Wilson, Woodrow. 1885. Congressional Government. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
Witt, E. 1992. “Is Government Full of Crooks or Are We Just Better at Finding Them?” In Essentials of Government Ethics, ed. Madsen, Peter and Shafritz, Jay M.. New York: PlumeGoogle Scholar
Wood, Stewart. 2001. “Labour Market Regime under Threat? Sources of Continuity in Germany, Britain, and Sweden.” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed. Pierson, Paul, 368–409. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, Diana. 1998. “The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards: Lessons from the ‘Cash for Questions’ Inquiry.” Parliamentary Affairs 51, no. 1: 51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Margaret. 2004. Legislative History of Bill C-4. Ottawa: Library of Parliament, February 12Google Scholar
Zellick, Graham. 1979. “Bribery of Members of Parliament and the Criminal Law.” Public Law (Spring): 31–58Google Scholar
Zinman, Seth D. 1994. “Judging Gift Rules by Their Wrappings – Towards a Clearer Articulation of Federal Employee Gift Acceptance Rules.” Catholic University Law Review 44: 141–204Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×