Book contents
- Half title page
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Defamation and privacy in an era of ‘more speech’
- 2 ‘Anyone … in any medium’? The scope of Canada’s responsible communication defence
- 3 ‘Ceci n’est pas une pipe’: the autopoietic inanity of the single meaning rule
- 4 New York Timesv.Sullivanat fifty years: defamation in separate orbits
- 5 Defamation and democracy
- 6 ‘A reasonable expectation of privacy’: a coherent or redundant concept?
- 7 Media intrusion into grief: lessons from the Pike River mining disaster
- 8 Press freedom, the public interest and privacy
- 9 The Atlantic divide on privacy and free speech
- 10 The ‘right to be forgotten’ by search engines under data privacy law: a legal and policy analysis of theCostejadecision
- 11 Privacy for the weak, transparency for the powerful*
- 12 The trouble with dignity
- 13 The uncertain landscape of Article 8 of the ECHR: the protection of reputation as a fundamental human right?
- 14 Vindicating reputation and privacy
- 15 Divining the dignity torts: a possible future for defamation and privacy
- 16 Reverberations ofSullivan? Considering defamation and privacy law reform
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
13 - The uncertain landscape of Article 8 of the ECHR: the protection of reputation as a fundamental human right?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
Edited by
Book contents
- Half title page
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Defamation and privacy in an era of ‘more speech’
- 2 ‘Anyone … in any medium’? The scope of Canada’s responsible communication defence
- 3 ‘Ceci n’est pas une pipe’: the autopoietic inanity of the single meaning rule
- 4 New York Timesv.Sullivanat fifty years: defamation in separate orbits
- 5 Defamation and democracy
- 6 ‘A reasonable expectation of privacy’: a coherent or redundant concept?
- 7 Media intrusion into grief: lessons from the Pike River mining disaster
- 8 Press freedom, the public interest and privacy
- 9 The Atlantic divide on privacy and free speech
- 10 The ‘right to be forgotten’ by search engines under data privacy law: a legal and policy analysis of theCostejadecision
- 11 Privacy for the weak, transparency for the powerful*
- 12 The trouble with dignity
- 13 The uncertain landscape of Article 8 of the ECHR: the protection of reputation as a fundamental human right?
- 14 Vindicating reputation and privacy
- 15 Divining the dignity torts: a possible future for defamation and privacy
- 16 Reverberations ofSullivan? Considering defamation and privacy law reform
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Comparative Defamation and Privacy Law , pp. 265 - 290Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
- 20
- Cited by