Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T10:32:53.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Rural mobilizations in Latin America since c. 1920

from Part Three - Society and politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Guillermo de la Peña
Edited by
Leslie Bethell
Guillermo de la Peña
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropologia Social de Occidente, Guadalajara
Leslie Bethell
Affiliation:
St Antony's College, Oxford
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Political mobilization and social violence have been recurrent phenomena in rural Latin America in the twentieth century. The enormous diversity in these phenomena represents a major challenge for anyone attempting to analyse them from a single perspective or with the purpose of drawing generalizations. However, it is possible to find a common framework for analysis if we accept that for all its heterogeneity rural unrest has taken place in the context of several great, inter-related processes of societal transformation, an essential ingredient of which has been conflict among contending social actors.

First, the hacienda (or latifundio) system and the peasant community ceased to be the dominant organizing forms of agricultural production. The hacienda owners — in so far as they survived as a class — largely lost their political hegemony. At the local level, this meant that they lost much of their capacity to exert social and political pressure (‘extra-economic coercion’) over peasants and workers. The persisting peasantries were no longer ‘tied to the land’. They gained in influence because of their alliances with the new political elites; but their importance steadily decreased vis-à-vis that of the emerging middle classes and the urban and rural proletariat.

Second, the capitalization of agriculture, which was a result of the increasing integration of the countryside with large urban markets and international channels of distribution, took a wide variety of forms, resulting in the emergence of new types of large and medium-sized farms and ranches but also in the transformation of the traditional family (peasant) unit.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Latin America , pp. 379 - 482
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Richard N., ‘The Conquest Tradition of Mesoamerica’, Texas Papers on Latin America, Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas at Austin, 1987.Google Scholar
Adams, Richard N. (ed.), Political Changes in Guatemalan Indian Communities (New Orleans: Middle American Research Institute, 1957).Google Scholar
Agudelo, Hernán Toro, ‘Planteamiento y soluciones del problema agrario’, in Cataño, Gonzalo (ed.), Colombia: estructura política y agraria (Bogotá, 1971).Google Scholar
Alexander, Robert J., The Communist Party of Venezuela (Stanford, Cal., 1969).Google Scholar
Alier, Juan Martinez, Los huacchilleros del Perú (Madrid, 1973).Google Scholar
Anderson, Thomas P., Matanza: El Salvador Communist Revolt of 1932 (Lincoln, Nebr., 1971)Google Scholar
Arboleda, Diego Castrilló, El indio Quintín Lame (Bogotá, 1973).Google Scholar
Arturo, Portes Gil Alvarado, ‘Perfil político de Emilio Portes Gil’, in Assad, Carlos Martínez (ed.) Estadistas, caciques y caudillos (Mexico, D.F., 1988)Google Scholar
Assad, Carlos Martínez, ‘Los caudillos regionales y el poder central’, in Assad, C. Martínez et al., Revolutionaries fueron todos (Mexico, D.F., 1982).Google Scholar
Assad, Carlos Martínez, El laboratorio de la revolución: el Tabasco garridista, (Mexico, D.F., 1979)Google Scholar
Azevedo, Fernando Antonio, As Ligas Camponesas (Rio de Janeiro, 1982), ch. 2.Google Scholar
Ballón, Eduardo, ‘El proceso de constitución del movimiento popular peruano’, in Camacho, Daniel and Menjívar, Rafael (eds), Los movimientos populares en América Latina (Mexico, D.F., 1989).Google Scholar
Barkin, David and Suárez, Blanca, El fin de la autosufuiencia alimentaria (Mexico, D.F., 1985).Google Scholar
Barre, Marie-Chantal, ‘La presencia indígena en los procesos sociopolíticos contemporáneos de Centroamérica’, Cuadernos Americanos (Nueva Epoca), III 6 (1989).Google Scholar
Barre, Marie-Chantal, Ideologías indígenas y movimientos indios (Mexico, D.F., 1983).Google Scholar
Bartra, Armando, Los herederos de Zapata. Movimientos campesinos posrevolucionarios en México (Mexico, D.F., 1985)Google Scholar
Batalla, Guillermo Bonfil (ed.), Utopía y revolución. El pensamiento político contemporáneo de los indios en América Latina (Mexico, D.F., 1981).Google Scholar
Beltrán, Gonzalo Aguirre, El proceso de aculturación (Mexico, D.F., 1957).Google Scholar
Beltrán, Gonzalo Aguirre, Formas de gobierno indígena (Mexico, D.F., 1953)Google Scholar
Browning, David, El Salvador, Landscape and Society (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar
Buitrago, Francisco Leal, Estado y política en Colombia (Bogotá, 1984)Google Scholar
Cabarrús, Carlos Rafael, Génesis de una revolutión. Análisis del surgimiento y desarrollo de la organización campesina en El Salvador (Mexico, D.F., 1983).Google Scholar
Calva, José Luis, Crisis agrícola y alimentaria en México, 1982–88 (Mexico, D.F., 1988)Google Scholar
Cambranes, Julio Castellanos, ‘Origins of the crisis of the established order in Guatemala’, in Ropp, Steve C. and Morris, James A. (eds), Central America. Crisis and Adaptation (Albuquerque, N. Mex., 1984).Google Scholar
Cardoza y Aragón, Luis, Guatemala: las líneal de su mano (Mexico, D.F., 1955).Google Scholar
Castillo, Leonardo and Lehmann, David, ‘Chile’s Three Agrarian Reforms: the inheritors’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, I, 2 (1982).Google Scholar
Castro, Fernando Salmerón, Los límites del agrarismo. Proceso político y estructuras de poder en Taretan, Michoacán (Zamora, 1989).Google Scholar
Chonchol, Jacques, ‘La reforma agraria en Chile (1964–1973)’, in García, Antonio (ed.), Desarrollo agrario y la América Latina (Mexico, D.F., 1981), esp.Google Scholar
Dandier, Jorge, El sindicalismo campesino en Bolivia: los cambios estructurales en Ucureña (1935–1932) (Mexico, D.F., 1969).Google Scholar
d’Arc, Hélene Riviere and Prevot-Schapira, Marie-France, ‘Les zapoteques, le PRI et la COCEI. Affrontements autour des interventions de l’Etat dans l’Isthme de Tehuantepec’, Amérique Latine, 15 (June 1983).Google Scholar
Davies, Thomas M. Jr., Indian integration in Peru: a half century of experience (Lincoln, Nebr., 1970).Google Scholar
Davis, Shelton H., Victims of the Miracle: development and the Indians of Brazil (Cambridge, 1977)Google Scholar
de Alcántara, Cynthia Hewitt, The Modernization of Mexican Agriculture, 1940–1970 (Geneva, 1973).Google Scholar
de la Peña, G., A Legacy of Promises. Agriculture, Politics and Rituals in the Morelos Highlands of Mexico (Austin, Tex., 1981).Google Scholar
de la Peña, Guillermo, ‘Commodity production, class differentiation and the role of the state in the Morelos highlands: an historical approach’, in Orlove, B. S., Foley, M.W., and Love, T. F., State, capital, and rural society. Anthropological perspectives on political economy in Mexico and the Andes (Boulder, Col., 1989).Google Scholar
de la Peña, Guillermo, ‘Populism, Regional Power, and Political Mediation: Southern Jalisco, 1900–80’, in Young, Eric (ed.), Mexican Regions: Comparative History and Development (San Diego, Cal., 1993).Google Scholar
de la Cruz, Víctor, ‘la rebelión de los juchitecos y uno de sus líderes: Che Gómez’, Historias, 17 (1987).Google Scholar
de Soto, Hernando, El Otro Sendero: la revolución informal (Lima, 1986)Google Scholar
Dew, Edward, Politics in the Altiplano. The Dynamics of Change in Rural Peru (Austin, Tex., 1969).Google Scholar
Dunkerley, James, Power in the Isthmus. A political history of modern Central America (London, 1988), ch. 2.Google Scholar
Fajardo, Darío, ‘La Violencia, 1946–1964. Su desarrollo y suimpacto’, paper presented at a seminar, La Cuestión Regional y la Cuestión Nacional en América Latina, El Colegio de México, November, 1981.
Falcńn, Romana, Revolución y caciquismo. San Luis Potosí, 190ndash;1938 (México, D.F., 1984), ch. IV.Google Scholar
Falcón, Romana and García, Soledad, La semilla en el surco. Adalberto Tejeda y el radicalismo en Veracruz, 1883–1960 (Mexico, D.F., 1986).Google Scholar
Falcón, Romana, El agrarismo en Veracruz. La etapa radical, 1928–1935 (Mexico, D.F., 1977).Google Scholar
Favre, Henri, ‘Capitalismo y etnicidad: la política indigenista del Perú’, in Bataillon, Claude et al., Indianidad, etnocidio, indigenismo en América Latina (Mexico D.F., 1988).Google Scholar
Favre, Henri, ‘Perú Sendero Luminoso y horizontes ocultos’, Cuadernos Americanos, 4, 4, (1987).Google Scholar
Flores, Gonzalo, ‘Levantamientos campesinos durante el periodo liberal’, in Calderón, Fernando and Dandier, Jorge (eds), Bolivia: la fuerza histórica del campesinado (Cochabamba, 1984)Google Scholar
Forman, Shephard, The Brazilian Peasantry (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul, The Princes of Naranja. An Essay in Anthrohistorical Method (Austin, Tex., 1986).Google Scholar
Friedrich’s, Paul classic, Agrarian revolt in a Mexican village, 2nd edn (Chicago, Ill., 1977)Google Scholar
Gilhodes, Pierre, La question agraire en Colombie (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
Gilly, Adolfo, La senda de la guerrilla (Mexico, D.E, 1986).Google Scholar
Glantz, Susana, El ejido colectivo de la Nueva Italia (Mexico, D.F., 1974), chs 7 and 8, and Manuel. Una biografía política (Mexico, D.F., 1979).Google Scholar
Gómez, Alcides, ‘Política agraria de López y Ley de Aparcería’, Ideología y Sociedad (Bogotá), 14–15 (1975).Google Scholar
Gómez Jara, Francisco A., El movimiento campesino en México (Mexico, D.F., 1970).Google Scholar
González, Beatriz Padilla, ‘La dirigencia política en Yucatán, 1909–1925’, in Cámara, L. Millet et al., Hacienda y cambio social en Yucatán (Mérida, 1984).Google Scholar
González, Luis, Pueblo en vilo (Mexico, 1968)Google Scholar
Goodman, D. E., ‘Rural Structure, Surplus Mobilisation, and Modes of Production in a Peripheral Region: the Brazilian North-east’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 5, 1 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordillo, Gustavo, Campesinos al asalto del cielo: De la expropiación estatal a la apropiación campesina (Mexico, D.F., 1988).Google Scholar
Gott, Richard, Rural Guerrillas in Latin America (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Greene, Graham, The Lawless Roads (London, 1987).Google Scholar
Guzmán, Germán, Camilo. Presenciay Destino (Bogotá, 1967).Google Scholar
Handelman, H., Struggle in the Andes. Peasant Political Mobilization in Peru (Austin, Tex., 1975), ch. 4Google Scholar
Hardy, Clarisa, El Estado y los campesinos: la Confederación Nacional Campesina (CNC) (Mexico, D.F., 1984).Google Scholar
Harvey, Neil, The New Agrarian Movement in Mexico, 1979–1990 (London, Institute of Latin American Studies, 1990), Research Paper 23Google Scholar
Herzog, Jesús Silva, El agrarismo mexicano y la reforma agraria, 2nd edn (Mexico, D.F., 1964)Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric J., ‘La Convención, a case of neo-feudalism’, Journal of Latin American Studies, I, 1 (1969).Google Scholar
Huizer, Gerrit, El potencial revolucionario del campesino en América Latina (Mexico, D.F., 1973).Google Scholar
Huizer, Grrit, La lucha campesina en México (Mexico, D.F., 1970)Google Scholar
Joseph, Gilbert, Revolution from without: Yucatán, Mexico, and the United States, 1880–1924 (Cambridge, 1982)Google Scholar
Joseph, Gilbert M., ‘Caciquismo and the revolution: Carrillo Puerto in the Yucatán’, in Brading, D. A. (ed.), Caudillo and Peasant in the Mexican Revolution (Cambridge, 1980)Google Scholar
Juliāo, Francisco, Cambāo: la cara oculta del Brasil (Mexico, D.F., 1968).Google Scholar
Kalmanovitz, Salomón, Economía y nación. Una breve historia de Colombia (Bogotá, 1985).Google Scholar
Kelley, Jonathan and Klein, Herbert S., Revolution and the Rebirth of Inequality. A theory applied to the national revolution in Bolivia (Berkeley, Cal., 1964)Google Scholar
Langer, Erick D., ‘The great southern Bolivian Indian rebellion of 1927: a microanalysis’, paper delivered at 46th International Congress of Americanists, Amsterdam, July, 1988.Google Scholar
Langer, Erick D., Rural Society and the Mining Economy in Southern Bolivia (Stanford, Cal., 1989).Google Scholar
Larín, Rafael Menjívar, El Salvador: el eslabón más pequeño (San José 1980).Google Scholar
León, Rosario, ‘Bartolina Sisa’: la organización de mujeres campesinas en Bolivia’, in Jelin, Elizabeth (ed.), Ciudadanía e identidad. Las mujeres en los movimientos sociales latino-americanos (Geneva, 1987).Google Scholar
Lernoux, Penny, ‘Los generates como revolucionarios’, Plural, 39 (1974)Google Scholar
López, Adriana Monjardín, ‘Los procesos electorales como alternativa para la disdencia rural’, in Patterson, Jorge Zepeda (ed.), Las sociedades rurales, hoy (Zamora, 1988)Google Scholar
Manjarrez, Froylán C., ‘La matanza de Xochicalco’, in Rubén Jaramillo. Autoiografía y asesinato (Mexico, D.F., 1957).Google Scholar
Marco, Palacios (ed.) La unidad nacional en América latina. Del regionalismo a la nacionalidad (Mexico, D.F., 1983).Google Scholar
Mariátegui, José Carlos, Stete ensayos de interpretatión de la realidad peruana (Mexico, D.F., 1979).Google Scholar
Marroquín, Alejandro D., ‘Estudio sobre la crisis de 1os años treinta en El Salvador’, in Casanova, Pablo González (ed.), América Latina en los años treinta (Mexico, D.F., 1978).Google Scholar
Martínez Assad, Garrido Carlos, ‘Los caudillos regionales y el poder central’, in Assad, Carlos Martínez et al., Revolutionarios fueron todos (Mexico, D.F., 1982)Google Scholar
Mayer, Eric, ‘State Policy and Rebellion in Ayacucho: the campesino movement in La Mar, 1922–1923’, paper delivered at 46th International Congress of Americanists, Amsterdam, 1988.
McClintock, Cynthia, Peasant Cooperatives and Political Change in Peru (Princeton, N.J., 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, Medófilo, ‘La resistencia campesina en el Sur de Tolima’, in Ensayos sobre la Violencia (Bogotá, 1983).Google Scholar
Melgarejo, Ramón Ramírez, ‘La bola chiquita: un movimiento campesino’, in Warman, Arturo et al., Los campesinos de la tierra de Zapata, I: Adaptación, cambio y rebelión (Mexico, D.F., 1974)Google Scholar
Menjívar, Rafael, Kam, Sui Moy Li, and Portuguez, Virginia ‘El movimiento campesino en Nicaragua’, in Camacho, Daniel and Menjívar, Rafael (eds), Movimientos populates en Centroamérica (San José, 1985).Google Scholar
Menjívar, Rafael, Formación y lucha del proletariado industrial salvadoreño (San Salvador, 1979).Google Scholar
Mercado, René Zavaleta, Bolivia: el desarrollo de la conciencia nacional (Montevideo, 1967)Google Scholar
Meyer, Jean, El sinarquismo ¿un fascismo mexicano? (Mexico, D.F., 1979).Google Scholar
Meyer, Lorenzo, ‘El conflicto social y los gobiernos del Maximato’, in Historia de la revolución mexicana, Vol. 13 (Mexico, D.F., 1978)Google Scholar
Murphy, Brian, ‘The Stunted Growth of Campesino Organizations’, in Adams, Richard N., Crucifixion by Power. Essays on Guatemalan national social structure, 1944–1966 (Austin, Tex., 1970).Google Scholar
North, Liisa, Bitter Grounds: Roots of revolt in El Salvador (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Oliveira, Ismarth Araujo, ‘Política indigenista brasileña’, América Indígena, 37, 1 (1977).Google Scholar
Oquist, Paul, Violence, Conflict, and Politics in Colombia (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
Ortiz, Orlando, Genaro Vázquez (Mexico, D.F., 1974)Google Scholar
Ortiz Sarmiento, Carlos Miguel, Estsdo y subversión en Colombia. La Violencia en el Quindío, años 50 (Bogotá, 1985).Google Scholar
Paige, Jeffrey M., ‘Social Theory and Peasant Revolution in Vietnam and Guatemala’, Theory and Society, 12 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios, Marco, Coffee in Colombia, 1850–1970. An Economic, Social and Political History (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar
Paoli, Francisco J., Yucatán y lot orígenes del nuevo estado mexicano, (Mexico, D.F., 1984)Google Scholar
Paré, Luisa, ‘Movimiento campesino y politica agraria en México, 1976–1982’, Revista Mexicana de Sociología, XLVI, 4 (1985).Google Scholar
Pasquel, Leonardo, La revolutión en el estado de Veracruz, Vol. I (Mexico, D.F., 1971)Google Scholar
Patch, Richard W., ‘Bolivia: U.S. assistance in a revolutionary setting’, in Adams, Richard N. et al., Social Change in Latin America Today (New York, 1960)Google Scholar
Patch, Richard W., ‘How Communal are the Communities?’, American Universities Field Staff, Latin America (Peru), 12 June 1959Google Scholar
Pearson, Neale J., ‘Guatemala: the peasant union movement, 1944–54’, in Landsberger, Henry A. (ed.), Latin American peasant movements (Ithaca, NY., 1969).Google Scholar
Petras, James and Hugo, Zemelman, Peasants in Revolt. A Chilean Case Study, 1965–71 (Austin, Tex., 1972), esp.Google Scholar
Preston, David, Farmers and Towns. Rural — Urban Relations in Highland Bolivia, (Norwich, Eng., 1978).Google Scholar
Rello, Fernando, Burguesía, campesinos y estado en México: el conflicto agrario de 1976 (Geneva, 1987).Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Darcy, Fronteras indígenas de la civilización (Mexico, D.F., 1971).Google Scholar
Rojas, Beatriz, La pequeña guerra. Los Carrera Torrs y los Cedilla (Zamora, 1983).Google Scholar
Rojas, Fernando, ‘Crisis económica y crisis política bajo el gobierno de Betancur’, in Calderón, Fernando (ed.), Los movimientos sociales frente a la crisis (Buenos Aires, 1986).Google Scholar
Ronfeldt, David, Atencingo. The Politics of Agrarian Struggle in a Mexican Ejido (Stanford, Cal., 1973), ch. 3.Google Scholar
Salamini, Heather Fowler, Agrarian Radicalism in Veracruz, 1920–38 (Lincoln, Neb., 1978).Google Scholar
Sanderson, Steven E., Agrarian Populism and the Mexican State. The Struggle for Land in Sonora (Berkeley, Cal., 1981).Google Scholar
Silvia, Rivera Cusicanqui, ‘Oprimidos pero no ventidos’, Luchas del campesinado aymara y qhechwa de Bolivia, 1900–1980 (Geneva, 1986), ch. II.Google Scholar
Silvia, Rivera Cusicanqui, ‘La expansión del latifundio en el Altiplano boliviano: elementos para una caracterización de una oligarquía regional’, in Florescano, Enrique (ed.), Orígenes y desarrollo de la burguesía en AméVica Latina, 1700–1955 (Mexico, D.F., 1985)Google Scholar
Silvia, Rivera Cusicanqui, Política e ideología en el movimiento campesino colombiano. El caso de la ANUC (Geneva, 1987).Google Scholar
Simpson, Eyler N., The Ejido: Mexico’s way out (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1937)Google Scholar
Smith, Gavin A. and Cano, Pedro, ‘Some Factors Contributing to Land Occupations in Peru: the example of Huasicancha, 1963–1968’, in Long, Norman and Roberts, Bryan (eds), Peasant Cooperation and Capitalist Expansion in Central Peru (Austin, Tex., 1978).Google Scholar
Suárez, Luis, Lucio Cabañas, el guerrillero sin esperanza (Mexico, D.F., 1984).Google Scholar
Tamayo, Jaime, ‘Los movimientos sociales. 1917–1929’, in Rendón, M. A. Aldana (ed.) Jalisco desde la Revolución, Vol. IV (Guadalajara, 1988)Google Scholar
Tamayo, Jaime, La clase obrera en la historia de México, Vol. 7: En el interinato de Adolfo de la Huerta y el gobierno de Alvaro Obregón (1920–1924) (Mexico, D.F., 1987).Google Scholar
Tutino, John, ‘Rebelión indígena en Tehuantepec’, Cuadernos Políticos, 24 (1980)Google Scholar
Urban, Greg, ‘Missions and Indians in Brazil’, Cultural Survival Quarterly, 7, 3 (1983)Google Scholar
Valderrama, Mariano, ‘Historia política del movimiento campesino peruano en el siglo XX’, in Casanova, Pablo González (ed.), Historia política de los campesinos latinoamericanos, Vol. 3 (Mexico, D.F., 1985).Google Scholar
Véjar, Rafael Guidos, El ascenso del militarismo en El Salvador (San Salvador, 1980)Google Scholar
Villanueva, Eric, Crisis henequenera y movimientos campesinos en Yucatán, 1966–1983 (Mexico, D.F. 1965).Google Scholar
Walsh Sanderson, Susan R., Land Reform in Mexico, 1910–1980 (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
Warman, Arturo, Los campesinos, hijos predilectos del régimen (Mexico, D.F., 1972).Google Scholar
Whetten, Nathan L., Rural Mexico (Chicago, Ill., 1948), ch. XX.Google Scholar
Whyte, William F., ‘Rural Peru — peasants as activists’, in Heath, D. B. (ed), Contemporary Cultures and Societies in Latin America, 2nd edn, (New York, 1974)Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R., Peasant Wars of the Tentieth Century (New York, 1969)Google Scholar
Woodward, Ralph Lee Jr., Central America. A nation divided, 2nd edn (New York, 1985), ch. 8Google Scholar
Zamosc, León, ‘Peasant Struggles of the 1970s in Colombia’, in Eckstein, Susan (ed.), Power and Popular Protest: Latin American Social Movements (Berkeley, Cal., 1989).Google Scholar
Zamosc, León, La cuestión agraria y el movimiento campesino en Colombia. Luchas de la Asociación Nacional de Usuarios Campesinos, 1967–1981 (Geneva, 1987).Google Scholar
Zárate, Margarita and Rosemberg, Florence (eds), Los indios de Brasil. Su proceso de lucha. (Documentos) (Mexico, D.F., 1989).Google Scholar
Zepeda, Jorge, ‘No es lo mismo agrario que agrio, ni comuneros que comunistas, pero se parecen. La UCEZ en Michoacán’, in Tamayo, Jaime (ed.), Perspectivas de los movimientos sociales en la región centro-occidente (Guadalajara, 1986).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×