IRANIAN SOCIETY AND LAW

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521246934.002

18 - IRANIAN SOCIETY AND LAW

from PART 5 - INSTITUTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

A. Perikhanian

Edited by

E. Yarshater

Show author details

A. Perikhanian: Affiliation:
Institute of Oriental Studies, Academy of Sciences, Leningrad

Book contents

Get access

Summary

SOURCES

For the questions dealt with in this chapter the available sources are markedly uneven in quality: evidence for the Parthian period is extremely meagre and fragmentary when compared with the information provided by the written sources of the Sasanian period.

Historical records in the Iranian language for the Parthian period, if such ever existed, have not survived. Some information, very scanty and inadequate, can be gathered from the works of Greek and Roman writers who lived in that period, and also from later Syriac and especially Armenian texts which sometimes refer back to events of the Parthian period and preserve a number of social and legal terms. Of incomparably greater value is the Parthian epigraphic evidence, the three private-law documents of the 1st century b.c. and the 1st century a.d. from Avroman (the earlier two are in Greek, the third in Middle Iranian), and some parchments from Dura-Europos which belong to the period of Parthian rule. During excavations of the Parthian fortress Mihrdātkart (at Nisā in modern Turkmenistān) Soviet archaeologists found about 3,000 potsherds inscribed in Parthian. The inscriptions cover the period from the end of the 2nd century b.c. to the middle of the 1st century a.d. They are mostly accounts, and the majority of them were found in the wine-storehouse where contributions in kind from neighbouring vineyards were assembled. Many of these documents have been published, but full publication is still in the preparatory stage.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Iran
Seleucid Parthian
, pp. 625 - 680

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521246934.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altheim, F. and Stiehl, R. Finanzgeschichte der Spätantike, Frankfurt am Main, 1957.Google Scholar

Anklesaria, T. D. The Social Code of the Parsees in Sasanian Times or the Mādigān-i Hazār Dādistān II (folios 74–91). Bombay, 1912.Google Scholar

Bartholomae, C., “Zum sasanidischen Recht I-V”, Sitzungsberichte der heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften (Phil. Hist. Klasse) (Heidelberg) 1918.5 (I), 14 (II); 1920.18 (III); 1922.5 (IV); 1923.9 (V).Google Scholar

Bartholomae, C. Die Frau im sasanidischen Recht. Heidelberg, 1924 (Kultur und Sprache 5).Google Scholar

Bartholomae, C. “Zum sasanidischen Recht”; see Mātigān i hazār dātistān, Modi, J. J., Mādigān-i Hazār Dādistān (folios 1–55). Bombay, 1901.Google Scholar

Benveniste, É. “Les classes sociales dans la tradition avestique”, Journal Asiatique (Paris) 1932.Google Scholar

Boyce, M. “On the sacred Fires of the Zoroastrians”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXI (1968).Google Scholar

Dārāb Hormazyār's Rivāyat, ed. Unvala, M. R., 2 vols. Bombay, 1922.Google Scholar

Menasce, J. “La conquête de l'iranisme et la recupération des mages hellénisés”, Annuaire de l'école pratique des hautes études, section des sciences religieuses (Paris, 1956–7).Google Scholar

Menasce, J.-P. Feux et fondations pieuses dans le droit sassanide. Paris, 1964.Google Scholar

de Menasce, J. Une encyclopédie mazdéenne, le Dēnkart. Paris, 1958.Google Scholar

Dēnkart, ed. Dresden, M. J.. Wiesbaden, 1966.Google Scholar

Dēnkart. Madan, D. M., ed. The Pahlavi Dinkard, 2 vols (pt I, books III-V, pt II, books VI–IX). Bombay, 1911.Google Scholar

Diakonoff, I. M. and Livshits, V. A. “Parfianskoje tsarskoje choziajstvo v Nise”, Vestnik drevneǐ istorii (Moscow) 1960. 2.Google Scholar

Frye, R. N. “Notes on the Early Sassanian State and Church”, Studi orientalistici in onore di G. Levi della Vida 1 (Rome 1956).Google Scholar

Harmatta, J., “Die sassanidischen Siegelinschriften”, A Ant ASH xn (1964).Google Scholar

Henning, W. B. “The Great Inscription of Šāpūr I”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental StudiesUniversity of London IX (1937–9).Google Scholar

Henning, W. B. “Notes on the Great Inscription of Šāpūr I”, in Prof Jackson Memorial Volume (Bombay, 1954).Google Scholar

Henning, W. B. “A Farewell to the Khagan of the Aq-Aqatärān”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XIV (1952).Google Scholar

Henning, W. B. “The inscription of Firuzabad”, Asia Major IV (1954).Google Scholar

Herzfeld, E. Paikuli, 2 Vols. Berlin, 1924.Google Scholar

Book III: tr. Menasce, J. as Le troisième livre du Dēnkart. Paris, 1973 (Travaux de l'institut d'études iraniennes de l'Université de Paris, 5; Bibliothèque des oeuvres classiques persanes, 4).Google Scholar

Books V and VII: tr. Molé, M. as La légende de Zoroastre selon les textes Pehlevis. Paris, 1967 (Travaux de l'institut d'études iraniennes de l'Université de Paris, 3).Google Scholar

Minns, E. H. “Parchments of the Parthian period from Avroman in Kurdistan”, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London) XXXV (1915).Google Scholar

Nāma-yi Tansar, ed. Minuvi, M.. Tehran, 1932; 2nd edition, Tehran, 1975.Google Scholar

Nyberg, H. S. “The Pahlavi Documents from Avromān”, Le Monde Oriental XVII (Uppsala, 1923).Google Scholar

Pagliaro, A. “Anticresi nel diritto sasanidico”, Rivista degli Studi Orientali (Rome) XV (1935).Google Scholar

Pahlavi, . Mātigān ī hazār dātistān. Modi, J. J., Mādigān-i Hazār Dādistān (folios 1–55). Bombay, 1901.Google Scholar

Perikhanian, A. G. “Agnatičeskije gruppy v drevnem Irane”, Vestnik drevneǐ istorii (Moscow) 1968. 3.Google Scholar

Perikhanian, A. G. “Notes sur le lexique iranien et armenien”, Revue des études arméniennes, nouvelle séric (Paris) V (1968).Google Scholar

Perikhanian, A. G. “On some Pahlavi Legal Terms”, in Boyce, M. and Gershevitch, I. (eds), W, B. Henning Memorial Volume (London, 1970).Google Scholar

Pigulevskaya, N. Goroda Irana v rannem srednevekovje. Moscow-Leningrad, 1956. French tr. as Les villes de l'État iranien aux époques parthe et sassanide. Paris, 1963.Google Scholar

Rivāyat-ī Hēmīt-ī Ašavahištān: vol. 1 (text and transcription), ed. Anklesaria, B. T. (Bombay, 1962); vol. 11 (translation and notes) not yet published.Google Scholar

Book VI: ed., tr. and annotated by Shaked, S. as Wisdom of Sasanian Sages. Boulder, Colorado, 1979 (Persian Heritage Series 34).Google Scholar

Sprengling, M. Third Century Iran, Sapor and Kartir. Chicago, 1953.Google Scholar

Syiac, . “The lawbook of Yišō'-boxt” in Sachau, E. (ed.), Syrische Rechtsbücher III (Berlin, 1914).Google Scholar

Tansar-nāma: Darmesteter, J.Persian text and French translation by, “Lettre de Tansar”, Journal Asiatique (Paris) 1894.Google Scholar

The Letter of Tansar, tr. Boyce, M.. Rome, 1968 (Rome Oriental Series, 38).Google Scholar

The Persian Rivāyats of Hormazyār Framarz and others, tr. Dhabhar, B. N.. Bombay, 1932.Google Scholar

Welles, C. B. et al. The Excavations at Dura-Europos, Final Report V, Part 1, The Parchments and Papyri. New Haven, 1959. See especially P. Dura 20 (= DPg 10).Google Scholar

Widengren, G. “Recherches sur le féodalisme iranien”, Orientalia Suecana V (Uppsala, 1956).Google Scholar

Book contents

18 - IRANIAN SOCIETY AND LAW

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive