Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:47:45.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

37 - Aesthetic Engagement: Lessons from Art History, Neuroscience, and Society

from Part V - Phenomenology-Based Forms of the Imagination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2020

Anna Abraham
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

In its emphasis on the feedback loops of top-down and bottom-up signal processing in the brain, and the exquisitely muddy area where they meet, the last century of psychology and neuroscience supports a model of aesthetic engagement wherein we meet the world halfway. As such, we ought to interrogate the apparati of our aesthetic engagements with equal fervor as we regard the pristine aesthetic objects themselves. In its unavoidable mustering of the totality of a person’s taste, expectation, and memory, as well as the social and political forces of the world around them, aesthetic engagement is thus far from a passive act. From traditions in art history that attribute creativity to the biographies of isolated geniuses to more recent offerings from neuroaesthetics that turn to the causative power of brain science, we explore several pitfalls of aesthetic engagement and interdisciplinarity, as well as possibilities for future avenues of inquiry that expand the engaged self to include more context.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Sepulcre, J., Poulin, R., and Buckner, R. L. (2010). Functional-Anatomic Fractionation of the Brain’s Default Network. Neuron, 65(4), 550562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aurier, Albert. (1974). Vincent, an Isolated Artist. In Welsh-Ovcharov, B. (ed.), Van Gogh in Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bremmer, H. (1974). Introductory Appreciations. In Welsh-Ovcharov, B. (ed.), Van Gogh in Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., and Schacter, D. L. (2008). The Brain’s Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 138.Google Scholar
Changizi, M. (2011). Harnessed: How Language and Music Mimicked Nature and Transformed Ape to Man. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979). Authorship: What is an Author? Screen, 20(1), 1334. doi:10.1093/screen/20.1.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V. (2017). The Empathic Body in Experimental Aesthetics – Embodied Simulation and Art. In Lux, V and Weigel, S (eds.), Empathy: Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 181199.Google Scholar
Harari, Y. N. (2015). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
Kandel, E. (2016). Reductionism in Art and Brain Science: Bridging the Two Cultures. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kris, E., Kurz, O., Laing, A., and Newman, L. M. (1979). Legend, Myth and Magic in the Image of the Artist: A Historical Experiment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Legrenzi, P., and Umiltà, C. A. (2011). Neuromania: On the Limits of Brain Science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Livingstone, M., and Hubel, D. (2014). Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing. New York, NY: Abrams.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., and Loemker, L. (1976). Philosophical Papers and Letters. 2nd edition. Dordrecht, Netherlands; Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Meier-Graefe, Julius. (1974). Vincent and Socialism. In Welsh-Ovcharov, B. (ed.), Van Gogh in Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2011). Art and the Limits of Neuroscience. The New York Times, December 4. opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/art-and-the-limits-of-neuroscience/.Google Scholar
Raichle, M. E. (2015). The Brain’s Default Mode Network. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 38(1), 433447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., and Rubin, N. (2013). Art Reaches Within: Aesthetic Experience, the Self and the Default Mode Network. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×