Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Introducing Intercultural Communication
- Part II Theoretical Approaches
- Part III Methods
- Part IV Application
- Part V Assessment
- 30 Defining, Developing and Assessing Intercultural Competence
- 31 Effects of Social Media Use on Cultural Adaptation
- 32 A Constructivist Approach to Assessing Intercultural Communication Competence
- Index
- References
32 - A Constructivist Approach to Assessing Intercultural Communication Competence
from Part V - Assessment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Introducing Intercultural Communication
- Part II Theoretical Approaches
- Part III Methods
- Part IV Application
- Part V Assessment
- 30 Defining, Developing and Assessing Intercultural Competence
- 31 Effects of Social Media Use on Cultural Adaptation
- 32 A Constructivist Approach to Assessing Intercultural Communication Competence
- Index
- References
Summary
Milton J. Bennett sets out by providing an overview of assessing intercultural communicative competence (ICC) through a constructivist lens. Bennett uses the Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity (DMIS) as an example of how constructivist theory and methodology can be applied to assessing ICC.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication , pp. 521 - 535Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. and Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.Google Scholar
Benedict, R. (1946). The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. (1986). A developmental approach to training intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 179–86.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. (2013). Basic Concepts of Intercultural Communication: Paradigms, Principles, and Practices. Boston, MA: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: Everything That Passes for Knowledge in Society. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Briggs, J. and Peat, F. (1984). The Looking Glass Universe: The Emerging Science of Wholeness. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Delia, J., O’Keefe, B and O’Keefe, D. (1982). The constructivist approach to communication. In Dance, F. E. X., ed., Human Communication Theory. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 147–91.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hammer, M., Bennett, M. and Wiseman, R (2003). Measuring intercultural competence: the intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, P. M. and Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2005). A developmental model of intercultural maturity. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 571–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1967). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Other Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1992). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, rev. ed. Boston and London: Shambhala Press.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (2001 [1938]). Growing Up in New Guinea: A Comparative Study of Primitive Education. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Nishida, H. (1999). Cultural schema theory. In Gudykunst, W. B., ed., Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 401–18.Google Scholar
Penrose, R., Hameroff, S. and Kak, S., eds. (2017). Consciousness and the Universe: Quantum Physics, Evolution, Brain & Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cosmology Publishing.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Foerster, H. (1984). On constructing a reality. In Watzlawick, P., ed., The Invented Reality: How Do We Know What We Believe We Know (Contributions to Constructivism). New York: Norton, pp. 41–62.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wheatley, M. (2006). Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. (1956). Science and linguistics. In Carroll, J. B., ed., Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York: John Wiley, pp. 265–80.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by