Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T08:55:52.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cogito Ergo Sum

from ENTRIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

Lex Newman
Affiliation:
University of Utah : Cogito Ergo Sum
Lawrence Nolan
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Get access

Summary

“I think, therefore I am” is the popularized formulation of Descartes’ famous cogito ergo sum (hereafter, “cogito”). The cogito's epistemological significance is supposed to derive from its status as an utterly self-evident truth – “the first and most certain of all to occur to anyone who philosophizes in an orderly way” (AT VIIIA 7, CSM I 195). “Orderly” philosophizing involves a program of methodic doubt – doubt resistance, or indubitability, being the central criterion of knowledge. Some texts express the cogito's underlying point in terms of doubt (itself a form of thinking): “It is not possible for us to doubt that we exist while we are doubting; and this is the first thing we come to know” (AT VIIIA 6f, CSM I 194). Barry Stroud (2010, 518) remarks that the cogito “is certainly among the most important and longest-lasting ingredients of Descartes's legacy.” Though Descartes’ treatment of the cogito is history's most famous, it is arguably not the first. Augustine of Hippo presented a remarkably similar version of his own: “If I am mistaken, I exist” (Si fallor, sum). The differences in formulation are not insignificant. Lively debates persist concerning Descartes’ own formulation.

The most serious debate about formulation concerns inference. Versions of the cogito appear in each of Descartes’ three main published philosophical works. The “canonical” formulation (as I shall call it) includes an explicit inference – “I am thinking, therefore [ergo] I exist.” This version appears in two of the works: the Discourse (1637) (je pense, donc je suis), and the Principles (1644) (ego cogito, ergo sum). However, Descartes’ masterpiece, the Meditations (1641), presents a rather different formulation. The formula there occurs early in the Second Meditation in the context of an effort to find an indubitable truth: “So after considering everything very thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist [Ego sum, ego existo], is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind” (AT VII 25, CSM II 17). Which of these represents Descartes’ official formulation? What follows are three main interpretive options.

One option is a noninferential interpretation. The most influential account comes from Jaakko Hintikka, who argues that the cogito should be understood as a performative utterance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broughton, Janet. 2002. Descartes's Method of Doubt. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. 1978. Descartes against the Sceptics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1966. “Descartes's Discussion of His Existence in the Second Meditation,” Philosophical Review 75: 329–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko. 1962. “Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance?,” Philosophical Review 71: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1968. Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy. Random House.Google Scholar
Newman, Lex. 2010. “Descartes’ Epistemology,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010), ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/descartes-epistemology/.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1945. A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 2010. “Our Debt to Descartes,” in A Companion to Descartes, ed. Broughton, J. and Carriero, J.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 513–25.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1984. The Matter of Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1978. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret Dauler. 1978. Descartes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Cogito Ergo Sum
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.056
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Cogito Ergo Sum
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.056
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Cogito Ergo Sum
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.056
Available formats
×