Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Judaism and Law
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to Judaism and Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Can We Even Speak of “Judaism and Law”?
- Part I Law as Constitutive of Biblical and Premodern Jewish Religious Expression
- Part II Enlightenment, Emancipation, and the Invention of Jewish “Religion”
- 6 From Enlightenment to Emancipation
- 7 Enlightenment Conceptions of Judaism and Law
- 8 Rethinking Halakhah in Modern Eastern Europe: Mysticism, Antinomianism, Positivism
- 9 Antinomianism and Its Responses in the Nineteenth Century
- 10 New Developments in Modern Jewish Thought: From Theology to Law and Back Again
- Part III Judaism and the Secular Jewish State
- Index
- Cambridge Companions to Religion (continued from page iii)
- References
10 - New Developments in Modern Jewish Thought: From Theology to Law and Back Again
from Part II - Enlightenment, Emancipation, and the Invention of Jewish “Religion”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Judaism and Law
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to Judaism and Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Can We Even Speak of “Judaism and Law”?
- Part I Law as Constitutive of Biblical and Premodern Jewish Religious Expression
- Part II Enlightenment, Emancipation, and the Invention of Jewish “Religion”
- 6 From Enlightenment to Emancipation
- 7 Enlightenment Conceptions of Judaism and Law
- 8 Rethinking Halakhah in Modern Eastern Europe: Mysticism, Antinomianism, Positivism
- 9 Antinomianism and Its Responses in the Nineteenth Century
- 10 New Developments in Modern Jewish Thought: From Theology to Law and Back Again
- Part III Judaism and the Secular Jewish State
- Index
- Cambridge Companions to Religion (continued from page iii)
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Judaism and Law , pp. 287 - 314Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adler, R., Engendering Judaism: An Inclusive Theology and Ethics (Boston: Beacon Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Arkush, A., Moses Mendelssohn and the Enlightenment (Albany, ny: State University of New York Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batnitzky, L., “From Politics to Law: Modern Jewish Thought and the Invention of Jewish Law,” Diné Israel 26 (2009), 7–44.Google Scholar
Batnitzky, L., “Hans Kelsen and Hermann Cohen: From Theology to Law and Back,” in Langford, P., Bryan, I., and McGarry, J. (eds.), The Foundation of the Juridico-Political: Concept Formation in Kelsen and Weber (New York: Routledge, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion (New York: Anchor Books, 1990).Google Scholar
Buber, M., “Concepts and Reality,” in Biemann, A. (ed.), The Martin Buber Reader (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), pp. 263–67.Google Scholar
Buber, M., I and Thou, trans. Kaufmann, W. (New York, London, Toronto, and Sydney: Simon & Schuster, 1996).Google Scholar
Buber, M., “Two Foci of the Jewish Soul,” in Biemann, A. (ed.), The Martin Buber Reader (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), pp. 107–14.Google Scholar
Cohen, H., Die Religion der Vernunft aus den Quellen des Judentums (Leipzig: Gustav Fock, 1919).Google Scholar
Cohen, H., Reason and Hope: Selections from the Jewish Writings of Hermann Cohen, ed. and trans. Jospe, Eva. (Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Cohen, H., Religion of Reason Out of the Sources of Judaism, trans. Kaplan, S. (New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Company, 1972).Google Scholar
Eisen, A., Rethinking Modern Judaism: Ritual, Commandment, Community (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Franks, P. W., “The Commandment of Joy and the Joy of Commandment: Simḥah Shel Mitzvah as the I-Thou Attunement of Halakhic Life,” unpublished lecture, New York, May 24, 2015.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., “Jurisprudence Is the Organon of Ethics: Kant and Cohen on Ethics, Law, and Religion,” in Munk, R. (ed.), Hermann Cohen’s Critical Idealism (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005), pp. 193–230.Google Scholar
Hartman, D., The God Who Hates Lies: Confronting and Rethinking Jewish Tradition (Woodstock: Jewish Lights, 2011).Google Scholar
Hess, J. M., Germans, Jews, and the Claims of Modernity (New Haven, ct: Yale University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Hollander, D., “Love-of-Neighbor and Ethics Out of Law in the Philosophy of Hermann Cohen,” in Wiese, C. and Urbana, M. (eds.), German-Jewish Thought between Religion and Politics: Festschrift in Honor of Paul Mendes-Flohr on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2012), pp. 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings, ed. and trans. Wood, A. and Di Giovanni, G. (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kant, I., “The Conflict of the Faculties,” in Wood, A. W. and Di Giovanni, G. (eds.), Religion and Rational Theology (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 233–328.Google Scholar
Kaplan, L., “Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik’s Philosophy of Halakha,” Jewish Law Annual 7 (1988): 139–97.Google Scholar
Kohler, G. Y., “Finding God’s Purpose: Hermann Cohen’s Use of Maimonides to Establish the Authority of Mosaic Law,” Journal for Jewish Thought and Philosophy 18:1 (2010): 85–115.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, Y., Emunah, Historiyah, va-ʻArakhim: Maʾamarim ve-Hartsaʾot [Faith, History, and Values: Essays and Lectures] (Jerusalem: Academon, 1982).Google Scholar
Leibowitz, Y., “Religious Praxis: The Meaning of Halakhah,” in Goldman, E. (ed.), Judaism, Human Values, and the Jewish State, trans. Goldman, E., Navon, Y., Jacobson, Z., Levi, G., and Levy, R. (Cambridge, ma and London: Harvard University Press, 1992), pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, Y., Siḥot ʻal Madaʻ va-ʻArakhim [Discourses on Science and Values] (Tel Aviv: Misrad ha-Bitaḥon, 1985).Google Scholar
Leibowitz, Y., “The Status of Women: Halakhah and Meta-Halakhah,” in Goldman, E. (ed.), Judaism, Human Values, and the Jewish State, trans. Goldman, E., Navon, Y., Jacobson, Z., Levi, G., and Levy, R. (Cambridge, ma and London: Harvard University Press, 1992), pp. 128–31.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, Y., Torah u-Mitzvot ba-Zeman ha-Zeh: Hartsa’ot u-Ma’amarim [Torah and Commandments in this Era: Lectures and Essays] (Tel Aviv: Masada, 1954).Google Scholar
Mitchell, H., Voltaire’s Jews and Modern Jewish Identity: Rethinking the Enlightenment (London and New York: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Plaskow, J., Standing Again at Sinai: Judaism from a Feminist Perspective (New York: HarperOne, 1991).Google Scholar
Plaskow, J., “The Right Question Is Theological,” in Heschel, S. (ed.), On Being a Jewish Feminist (New York: Schocken Books, 1995), pp. 223–33.Google Scholar
Poma, A., The Critical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen, trans. Denton, J. (Albany, ny: State University of New York Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, F., Franz Rosenzweig: His Life and Thought, ed. Glatzer, N. N. (Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1998).Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, F., On Jewish Learning, ed. Glatzer, N. N. (Madison, wi: University of Wisconsin Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, F., Philosophical and Theological Writings, ed. and trans. Franks, P. W. and Morgan, M. L. (Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 2000).Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, F., The Star of Redemption, trans. Galli, B. E. (Madison, wi: University of Wisconsin Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Ross, T., Expanding the Palace of Torah: Orthodoxy and Feminism (Hanover and London: Brandeis University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Saiman, Ch., “Legal Theology: The Turn to Conceptualism in Nineteenth Century Jewish Law,” Journal of Law and Religion 21:1 (2006), 39–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrempf, C., Die Christliche Weltanschauung und Kant’s Sittlicher Glaube: Eine Religiöse Untersuchung (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1891).Google Scholar
Solomon, N., The Analytic Movement: Hayyim Soloveitchik and His Circle (Atlanta, ga: Scholars Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Soloveitchik, J. B., Halakhic Man, trans. Kaplan, L. (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1983).Google Scholar
Soloveitchik, J. B., The Halakhic Mind: An Essay on Jewish Tradition and Modern Thought (New York: Seth Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Solowiejczyk, J., “Das reine Denken und die Seinskonstituierung bei Hermann Cohen [The Pure Thought and the Constitution of Being according to Hermann Cohen],” unpublished dissertation, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin (1932).Google Scholar
Spinoza, B., Theological-Political Treatise, trans. Shirley, S. (Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 2001).Google Scholar
Sufrin, C. E., “Telling Stories: The Legal Turn in Jewish Feminist Thought,” in Kaplan, M. A. and Moore, D. D. (eds.), Gender and Jewish History (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2011), pp. 233–48.Google Scholar
Yardeni, M., “La Vision des Juifs et du Judaisme dans l’Oeuvre de Pierre Bayle,” in Yardeni, M. (ed.), Les Juifs dans L’Histoire de France (Leiden: Brill, 1980), pp. 86–95.Google Scholar