Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:50:06.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Third Factors in Language Design: Some Suggestions from Quantum Field Theory

from Part I - The Science of Language: Recent Change and Progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2017

By
Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini  and
Giuseppe Vitiello
Edited by
James McGilvray
James McGilvray
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky , pp. 134 - 152
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfinito, E., Viglione, R. G., and Vitiello, G. 2001. “The Decoherence Criterion.” Modern Physics Letters B 15:127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beige, A., Knight, P. L., and Vitiello, G.. 2005. “Cooling Many Particles at Once.” New Journal of Physics. 7(9):96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasone, M., Jizba, P., and Vitiello, G.. 2011. Quantum Field Theory and Its Macroscopic Manifestations. London: Imperial College Press/World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., and Nunes, J.. 2007. “Overt Copies in Reflexive and Control Structures: A Movement Analysis.” In Conroy, A., Jing, C., Nakao, C., and Takahashi, E., eds. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 15:1–46.Google Scholar
Boolos, G. 1993. The Logic of Provability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. 2006. “Formal Semantics.” In Brown, E. K., Asher, R. E., and Simpson, J. M. Y., eds. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 564–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G., and McConnell-Ginet, S.. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding (The Pisa Lectures). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger Scientific.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2013a. “Problems of Projection.” Lingua 130:33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2013b. “Notes on Denotation and Denoting.” In Caponigro, I. and Cecchetto, C., eds. From Grammar to Meaning: The Spontaneous Logicality of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2013c. “What Is Language” (First lecture of Dewey Lectures 2013: “What Kind of Creatures Are We?” The Journal of Philosophy 110(12): 645–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2015. “Problems of Projection: Extensions.” In Di Domenico, E., Hamann, C. and Matteini, S., eds. Structures, Strategies and Beyond. Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2017. “Puzzles about Phases.” In Franco, L. and Bellucci, G., eds., Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation – A Festschrift in Honour of M. Rita Manzini. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and McGilvray, J., 2012. The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, F. 2011. The Infinity Puzzle: Quantum Field Theory and the Hunt for an Orderly Universe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A. M. 2005. Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A. M., and Williams, E., 1978. Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., Kitahara, H., and Seely, D.. 2012. “Structure Building That Can’t Be.” In Uribe-Etxebarria, M. and Valmala, V., eds. Ways of Structure Building. Oxford University Press. 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, R. P. and Hibbs, A. R.. 1965. Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. New York: McGraw-Hill Co.Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., and Sands, M.. 1963. The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. D. 1980. Semantics: Theories of Meaning in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z.. 2015. Minds without Meanings: An Essay on the Content of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, W. J., and Vitiello, G.. 2006. “Nonlinear Brain Dynamics as Macroscopic Manifestation of Underlying Many-Body Dynamics.” Physics of Life Reviews 3:93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, W. J., and Vitiello, G.. 2008. “Brain Dynamics, Dissipation, and Spontaneous Breakdown of Symmetry.” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41 (30): 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, R. 1994. Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Some of Their Applications. Malabar FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heim, I. and Kratzer, A.. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J. T. 1985. “On Semantics.” Linguistic Inquiry 16(4):547–593.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., and Grohmann, K. K.. 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idsardi, W. J., and Uriagereka, J.. 2009. “Metrical Combinatorics and the Real Half of the Fibonacci Sequence.” Biolinguistics 3(4):404–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGilvray, J. 1998. “Meanings Are Syntactically Individuated and Found in the Head.” Mind and Language 13:225–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGilvray, J. 1999/2014. Chomsky: Language, Mind and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Second extensively revised edition (2014).Google Scholar
Medeiros, D. P. 2008. “Optimal Growth in Phrase Structure.” Biolinguistics 2(3):152–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, D. P. 2012. Economy of Command. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Medeiros, D. P., and Piattelli-Palmarini, M. 2016. “The Golden Phrase: Steps to the Physics of Language.” In Gallego, A. and Martin, R., eds. Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moro, A. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moro, A. 2013. “Rethinking Symmetry: A Note on Labeling and the EPP.” The Equilibrium of Human Syntax. Symmetries in the Brain. New York: Routledge. 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M., and Uriagereka, J.. 2008. “Still a Bridge Too Far? Biolinguistic Questions for Grounding Language on Brains.” Physics of Life Reviews 5(4):207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M., and Vitiello, G.. 2015. “Linguistics and Some Aspects of its Underlying Dynamics.” Biolinguistics 9: 96–115. See also arXiv:1506.08663 at http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietroski, P. M. 2005. “Meaning Before Truth.” In Preyer, G. and Peters, G., eds. Contextualism in Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 225–300.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. 1955. Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I., and Glandsorff, P.. 1971. Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. 2006. “Lexical Semantics: Overview.” In Keith, B., ed. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier. 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, M. N., Umezawa, H., and Vitiello, G.. 1974. “Relation Among Spin Operators and Magnons.” Physical Review B 10:4724–4736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umezawa, H. 1993. Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro and Thermal Concepts. New York: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Vitiello, G. 1974. “Dynamical Rearrangement of Symmetry,” Dissertation Abstract International 36–02, Section B:0769.Google Scholar
Vitiello, G. 2001. My Double Unveiled. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, K., and Matthewson, L.. 2008. “Universals in Semantics.” The Linguistic Review 25:139–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wybourne, B. G. 1974. Classical Groups for Physicists. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Zee, A. 2010. Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (2nd ed.). Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×